metricas
covid
Buscar en
Cirugía Española
Toda la web
Inicio Cirugía Española Resultados a medio plazo y calidad de vida del tratamiento laparoscópico de la ...
Información de la revista
Vol. 76. Núm. 6.
Páginas 382-387 (diciembre 2004)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 76. Núm. 6.
Páginas 382-387 (diciembre 2004)
Acceso a texto completo
Resultados a medio plazo y calidad de vida del tratamiento laparoscópico de la hernia de hiato paraesofágica
Medium-Term results and quality of life after laparoscopic treatment of paraesophageal hiatus hernia
Visitas
5568
José Novella,1
Autor para correspondencia
etargarona@hsp.santpau.es

Correspondencia: Dr. E.M. Targarona. Servicio de Cirugía. Hospital de Sant Pau. Sant Antoni Maria Claret 167. 08029 Barcelona. España.
, Eduardo M. Targaronaa, Sandra Velaa, Gemma Cerdána, Gali Bendahana, Sofía Torrubiab, Pere Rebasaa, Verónica Alonsoa, Carmen Balaguéa, Jorge Garrigaa, Manuel Triasa
a Servicio de Cirugía General. Hospital de Sant Pau. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Barcelona
b Servicio de Radiología. Hospital de Sant Pau. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Barcelona. España
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Resumen
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Resumen
Introducción

La reparación laparoscópica de las hernias paraesofágicas (HPE) y mixtas es factible, con excelentes resultados inmediatos y a corto plazo. De todas formas, se han observado tasas de recidiva de hasta el 40% en el seguimiento a medio plazo. La utilización de escalas de calidad de vida permite evaluar con más exactitud el impacto del tratamiento quirúrgico en el estado de salud global de los pacientes, pero no se dispone de información sobre la calidad de vida postoperatoria en relación con el tratamiento laparoscópico de las HPE y sus recidivas.

Objetivo

Evaluar prospectivamente la presencia de recidivas anatómicas y/o sintomáticas y su correlación con la calidad de vida en pacientes intervenidos de HPE o mixtas.

Material y método

Se revaluó a todos los pacientes intervenidos por laparoscopia de una HPE o mixta entre febrero de 1998 y marzo del 2003. A todos ellos se les practicó un esofagograma, se analizaron sus síntomas y se les efectuó una entrevista en la que respondieron a varios tests de calidad de vida: Short Form-36 (SF-36), Glasgow Dyspepsia Severity Score (GDSS) y Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Score (GIQLI).

Resultados

Durante el período de estudio se intervino a 46 pacientes, con una media de edad 68 años (rango, 22-81). En 37 fue posible realizar un seguimiento mínimo de 6 meses. Ocho pacientes (8/37, 21%) refirieron síntomas postoperatorios de origen gastrointestinal. Se practicó un esofagograma en 30 pacientes (30/37, 81%), que mostró una recidiva en 6 (20%). Los tests de calidad de vida tipo SF-36 y GDSS no mostraron diferencias significativas con los valores estándar de la población española con una edad y comorbilidad similares. Los pacientes sin recidiva alcanzaron valores con la escala GIQLI comparables a los de la población general. Los pacientes con recidiva clínica mostraron valores significativamente inferiores a los del grupo no recidivado o a los del grupo con recidiva sólo radiológica.

Conclusión

El tratamiento laparoscópico de la HPE y mixta es factible, seguro y ofrece una buena calidad de vida a medio plazo. Sin embargo, la incidencia de recidivas anatómicas y funcionales es elevada, por lo que es necesario identificar el subgrupo de pacientes con riesgo de fracaso y las técnicas alternativas para garantizar la durabilidad de la reparación quirúrgica.

Palabras clave:
Hernia paraesofágica
Laparoscopia
Calidad de vida
Recidiva
Introduction

Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal and mixed hernias is feasible, with excellent immediate- and short-term results. However, recurrence rates of up to 40% have been observed in the medium- term. The use of quality of life scales allows the impact of surgical treatment on patients’ global health status to be evaluated with greater precision but no information is available on quality of life after laparoscopic surgery for paraesophageal hernias or their recurrence.

Objective

To prospectively evaluate anatomical/and or symptomatic recurrences and their correlation with quality of life in patients who underwent surgery for paraesophageal or mixed hernias.

Material and method

All patients who underwent laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal or mixed hernias between February 1998 and March 2003 were reevaluated. All patients underwent an esophagogram. The patients’ symptoms were analyzed and all patients were interviewed with administration of several quality of life tests: Short Form-36 (SF-36), Glasgow Dyspepsia Severity Score (GDSS) and Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Score (GIQLI).

Results

During the study period, 46 patients underwent surgery. The mean age was 68 years (22-81). A minimum follow-up of 6 months was possible in 37 patients. Eight patients (8/37; 21%) reported postoperative gastrointestinal symptoms. Esophagogram was performed in 30 patients (30/37; 81%) and showed recurrence in six (20%). The quality of life scales, SF-37 and GDSS showed no significant differences with standard values for the Spanish population with similar age and comorbidity. Values of the GIQLI in patients without recurrence were similar to those in the general population. Patients with clinical recurrence showed significantly lower values than the group without recurrence and the group with radiological recurrence only.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic treatment of paraesophageal and mixed hernias is feasible and safe and provides good quality of life in the medium term. However, the incidence of anatomical and functional recurrence is high. Consequently, the subgroup of patients at risk for treatment failure should be identified and alternative techniques to guarantee the durability of surgical repair should be provided.

Key words:
Paraesophageal hernia
Laparoscopy
Quality of life
Recurrence
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
B.K. Oelschlager, C.A. Pellegrini.
Paraesophageal hernias. Open, laparoscopic, or thoracic repair.
Chest Surg Clin North Am, 11 (2001), pp. 589-603
[2.]
G. Perdikis, R.A. Hinder, C.J. Filipi, T. Walenz, P.J. McBride, S.L. Smith, et al.
Laparoscopic paresophageal hernia repair.
Arch Surg, 132 (1997), pp. 586-590
[3.]
M.B. Edye, J. Canin-Endres, F. Gattorno, B.A. Salky.
Durability of laproscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia.
Ann Surg, 228 (1998), pp. 528-535
[4.]
W.A. Gantert, M.G. Patti, M. Arcerito, C. Feo, L. Stewart, M. DePinto, et al.
Laproscopic repair of paraesophageal hiatal hernias.
J Am Coll Surg, 186 (1998), pp. 428-433
[5.]
D.I. Watson, N. Davies, P.G. Devitt, G.G. Jamieson.
Importance of dissection of the hernial sac in laparoscopic surgery for large hiatal hernias.
Arch Surg, 134 (1999), pp. 1069-1073
[6.]
J.S. Wu, D.L. Dunnegan, N.J. Soper.
Clinical and radiologic assessment of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair.
Surg Endosc, 13 (1999), pp. 497-502
[7.]
S. Horgan, T.R. Eubanks, G. Jacobsen, P. Omelanczuk, C.A. Pellegrini.
Repair of paraesophageal hernias.
Am J Surg, 177 (1999), pp. 354-358
[8.]
L.L. Swanstrom, B.A. Jobe, L.R. Kinzie, K.D. Horvath.
Esophageal motility and outcome following laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair and fundoplication.
Am J Surg, 177 (1999), pp. 359-363
[9.]
M. Hashemi, J.H. Peters, T.R. DeMeester, J.E. Huprich, M. Quek, J.A. Hagen, et al.
Laparoscopic repair of large type III hiatal hernia: objective follow up reveals high recurrence rate.
J Am Coll Surg, 190 (2000), pp. 553-561
[10.]
D.L. Peet, E.C. Klinkerberg-Knol, A. Alonso, C. Sietses, Q.A.J. Eijsbouts, M.A. Cuesta.
Laparoscopic treatment of large paraesophageal hernias.
Surg Endosc, 14 (2000), pp. 1015-1018
[11.]
P.S. Dahlberg, C. Deschamps, D.L. Miller, M.S. Allen, F.C. Nichols, P.C. Pairolero.
Laparoscopic repair of large paraesophageal hiatal hernia.
Ann Thor Surg, 72 (2001), pp. 1125-1129
[12.]
R.J. Wiechman, M.K. Ferguson, K.S. Naunheim, P. McKesey, S.J. Hazelrigg, T.S. Sanntucci, et al.
Laparoscopic management of giant paraesophageal herniation.
Ann Thorac Surg, 71 (2001), pp. 1080-1087
[13.]
V. Velanovich, R. Karmy-Jones.
Surgical management of praesophageal hernias: outcome and quality of life analysis.
Dig Surg, 18 (2001), pp. 432-438
[14.]
L. Khaitan, H. Houston, K. Sharp, M. Holzman, W. Richards.
Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair has an acceptable recurrence rate.
Am Surg, 68 (2002), pp. 546-551
[15.]
A.F. Pierre, J.D. Luketich, H.C. Fernando, N.A. Christie, P.O. Buenaventura, V.R. Litle, et al.
Results of laparoscopic repair of giant paraesophageal hernias: 200 consecutive patients.
Ann Thorac Surg, 74 (2002), pp. 1909-1916
[16.]
S.G. Mattar, S.P. Bowers, K.D. Galloway, C.D. Hunter, C.D. Smith.
Longterm outcome of laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia.
Surg Endosc, 16 (2002), pp. 745-749
[17.]
S. Diaz, M. Brunt, M.E. Klingensmith, P.M. Frisella, N.J. Soper.
Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair, a challenging operation: medium-term outcome of 116 patients.
J Gastroint Surg, 7 (2003), pp. 59-67
[18.]
P.C. Leeder, G. Smith, TCB. Dehn.
Laparoscopic management of large paraesophageal hiatal hernia.
Surg Endosc, 17 (2003), pp. 1372-1375
[19.]
J. Ponsky, M. Rosen, A. Fanning, J. Malm.
Anterior gastropexy may reduce the recurrence after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair.
Surg Endosc, 17 (2003), pp. 1036-1041
[20.]
B.A. Jobe, R.W. Aye, C.W. Deveney, J.S. Domreis, L.D. Hill.
Laparoscopic management of giant type III hiatal hernia and short esophagus. Objective follow up at three years.
J Gastrointest Surg, 6 (2002), pp. 181-188
[21.]
A. Keidar, A. Szold.
Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia with selective use of mesh.
Surg Laparosc Endosc, 13 (2003), pp. 149-154
[22.]
C. Jenkinson, H. McGee.
Generic single-index measures of health satatus.
Health Satus Measurement: a brief but clinical introduction,
[23.]
R.M. Kaplan.
Profile versus utility based measures of out-come for clinical trials.
Quality of Life Assessment in Clinical Trials,
[24.]
G.M. Eisen, G.R. Locke, D. Provenzale.
Health-Related Quality of Life: a primer for gastroeneterologists.
Am J Gastroenterol, 94 (1999), pp. 2017-2021
[25.]
J. Alonso, E. Regidor, G. Barrio, L. Prieto, C. Rodríguez, L. Fuente.
Valores poblacionales de referencia de la versión española del cuestionario de salud SF-36.
Med Clin (Barc, 111 (1998), pp. 410-416
[26.]
J. Camilleri-Brennan, R.J.C. Steele.
Measurement of quality of life in surgery.
J R Coll Surg Edinb, 44 (1999), pp. 252-259
[27.]
M.A. Testa, D.C. Simonson.
Assessment of quality of life outcomes.
N Engl J Med, 334 (1996), pp. 835-840
[28.]
J. Mones, A. Adan, J.S. López, M. Artes.
Validation of the Spanish version of the Glasgow Dyspepsia Severity Score.
Rev Esp Enf Dig, 93 (2001), pp. 170-175
[29.]
E. Eyspach, J.L. Williams, S. Wood-Dauphinee, B.M. Ure, E. Neugebauer, H. Troidl.
Gastrointestinal quality of life index development, validation an application of a new instrument.
Br J Surg, 82 (1995), pp. 216-222
[30.]
N. Stylopoulos, G.S. Gazelle, D.W. Rattner.
Paraesophageal hernias: operation or observation?.
[31.]
L.D. Hill.
Incarcerated paraesophageal hernia. A surgical emergency.
Am J Surg, 126 (1973), pp. 286-289
[32.]
Fh Jr Ellis, R.E. Crozier, J.A. Shea.
Paraesophageal hiatus hernia.
Arch Surg, 121 (1986), pp. 416-420
[33.]
D.B. Skinner, R.H. Belsey.
Surgical management of esophageal reflux and hiatus. Long-term results with 1.030 patients.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 53 (1967), pp. 33-54
[34.]
H.C. Fernando, P.R. Schauer, M. Rosenblat, A. Wald, P. Buenaventura, S. Ikramundin, et al.
Quality of life after antireflux surgery compared with non-operative management for severe gastroesophageal reflux disease.
J Am Coll Surg, 194 (2002), pp. 23-27
[35.]
V. Velanovich.
Laparoscopic versus open surgery: a preliminary comparison of quality of life outcomes.
Surg Endosc, 14 (2000), pp. 16-21
[36.]
C. Mobius, H.J. Stein, M. Feith, H. Feussner, J.R. Siewert.
Quality of life before and after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.
Surg Endosc, 15 (2001), pp. 353-356
[37.]
T.L. Trus, T. Bax, W.S. Richardson, G.D. Branum, S.J. Mauren, L.L. Swanstrom, et al.
Complications of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair.
J Gastrointest Surg, 1 (1997), pp. 221-228
[38.]
J.K. Champion, D. Rock.
Laparoscopic mesh cruroplasty for large paraesophageal hernias.
Surg Endosc, 17 (2003), pp. 551-553
[39.]
B.K. Oelschlager, M. Barreca, L. Chang, C.A. Pellegrini.
The use of small intestine submucosa in the repair of paraesophageal hernias: initial observations of a new technique.
Am J Surg, 186 (2003), pp. 4-8
[40.]
C.T. Frantzides, A.K. Madan, M.A. Carlson, G.P. Stavropoulos.
A prospective, randomized trial of laparoscopic polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) patch repair vs simple cruroplasty for large hiatal hernia.
Arch Surg, 137 (2002), pp. 649-652
Copyright © 2004. Asociación Española de Cirujanos
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos