metricas
covid
Buscar en
Cirugía Española (English Edition)
Toda la web
Inicio Cirugía Española (English Edition) Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the liver mimicking Klatskin tumor
Información de la revista
Vol. 101. Núm. 4.
Páginas 303-307 (abril 2023)
Vol. 101. Núm. 4.
Páginas 303-307 (abril 2023)
Scientific letter
Acceso a texto completo
Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the liver mimicking Klatskin tumor
Tumor miofibroblástico inflamatorio hepático que mimetiza un tumor de Klatskin
Visitas
170
Luis Carlos Hinojosa Arcoa,
Autor para correspondencia
luiscarlosha87@gmail.com

Corresponding author.
, Jorge Francisco Roldán de la Rúaa, Isabel Arranz Salasb, Rocío Gómez Péreza, Miguel Ángel Suárez Muñoza
a Servicio de Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain
b Servicio de Anatomía Patológica, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Figuras (1)
Texto completo

Cholangiocarcinoma is the most common malignant neoplasm of the bile duct. It is an aggressive cancer whose only potentially curative treatment is surgery. Depending on its location, cholangiocarcinoma is classified as intrahepatic, distal and perihilar or Klatskin tumor. Given the low cost-effectiveness of preoperative cytological studies, the indication for surgical treatment is usually based on clinical and radiological findings. Despite this, up to 15% of biliary strictures may be associated with other pathological processes, a fact that often cannot be corroborated until the definitive pathological study is completed1.

In this context, we present the case of a 37-year-old male patient who was admitted due to painless jaundice, pruritus and asthenia that had been progressing over the previous 2 weeks. His medical history of interest included a tobacco habit of 10 pack-years and laparoscopic surgery for acute appendicitis one year before the onset of the current symptoms. Lab work-up showed the following values: total bilirubin 3.8 mg/dL, direct bilirubin 3.1 mg/dL, GOT 87 U/L, GGT 356 U/L, alkaline phosphatase 227 U/L, slight leukocytosis, and negative tumor markers (CEA and CA 19.9). Imaging tests (thoracic-abdominal-pelvic CT scan and hepatic and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography [MRCP]) show a mass infiltrating the left hepatic duct with dilatation of the ipsilateral intrahepatic bile duct (Fig. 1, images A and B), with no distant disease. These findings suggested a type IIIb Klatskin tumor as the first possible diagnosis1. Surgical treatment was decided after evaluation by a multidisciplinary committee, involving left hepatectomy extended to the caudate lobe with resection of the main bile duct and the right hepatic duct up to the sectoral bifurcation, preserving the carina of both sectoral ducts. Biliary tract reconstruction was conducted with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. The postoperative period was uneventful except for a low-output biliary fistula, which was resolved with conservative management.

Fig. 1.

A) Hepatic magnetic resonance study showing a mass that is neoplastic in appearance (red arrow) in the perihilar area, infiltrating the left hepatic duct and causing dilation. B) Nuclear magnetic resonance cholangiography showing notable dilation of the left intrahepatic bile duct and, to a lesser degree, of the right bile duct. Radiological ‘silence’ is observed at the bifurcation of both hepatic ducts secondary to the tumor. The common bile duct presents a normal diameter. C) Macroscopic image of the hepatectomy piece. A 2.3 × 1.9 cm lesion (blue arrow) is observed, partially encompassing the bile duct (green arrow) with a surrounding inflammatory reaction. D) Microscopic image of the hepatectomy specimen. The mass is mainly formed by a loose stroma with epithelioid cells, evident nucleoli and areas of more fasciculated distribution. Both areas present an inflammatory infiltrate comprised of lymphocytes, eosinophils, and plasma cells. Tumor cells express ALK with a characteristic nuclear membrane pattern, typical of this type of tumor.

(0.28MB).

The pathological anatomy report indicated the presence of a lesion measuring 2.3 × 1.9 cm with free margins, formed by a lax stroma and epithelioid cells with evident nucleoli, areas of fasciculated distribution and inflammatory infiltrate, which were compatible with inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) (Fig. 1C). Tumor cells expressed ALK (anaplastic lymphoma kinase) (Fig. 1D). Other immunohistochemical markers related to rare neoplasms were negative, including CD34, CD21, CD117, CD23 and S100. With this information, we decided to complete follow-up without adjuvant treatment, and the patient was disease-free one year after the procedure.

IMT is a rare neoplasm that usually affects the lungs and abdominopelvic region. Although it has been related to other processes, such as inflammatory pseudotumor or plasma cell granuloma, it is recognized as a true soft tissue neoplasm of intermediate biological potential due to its ability to develop recurrence and metastasis2. Its appearance in the liver is rare and can lead to different forms of presentation, mimicking the behavior of other tumors. Therefore, it should be considered in the differential diagnosis of other tumors, such as hepatocarcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, sarcomas, and benign processes like adenomas, cystic echinococcosis, or liver abscesses2–5.

IMT has been related to infectious, inflammatory and other malignant diseases2, although its etiology has yet to be clarified. It seems to be more common in young men3, a fact that differentiates it from cholangiocarcinoma, in which the age of presentation is higher (except in cases of primary sclerosing cholangitis)1. IMT does not present clinical characteristics or specific analytical markers, and elevated acute phase reactants, such as leukocytes or C-reactive protein, are only observed in some patients. Radiologically, the suspicion arises when observing a soft tissue mass with heterogeneous enhancement that may invade neighboring structures2,3. When there is involvement of the extrahepatic bile duct, diagnosis is possible by ERCP and cholangioscopy4.

As for its histology, IMT is made up of areas of proliferation of myofibroblasts mixed with collagen fibers and infiltration of inflammatory cells2. Macroscopically, it is usually solitary, with a firm consistency, well defined, not encapsulated and with a yellowish-white2,3. As a differential finding, 50%–60% of cases are positive for ALK, a factor that is related with a lower incidence of metastasis6.

Depending on the symptoms, location and suspected diagnosis, different treatment options have been described, from surgery to conservative management. The studies by Tang7 and Yang8 describe the evolution of 74 patients treated surgically for hepatic IMT, all of whom were disease-free after a mean follow-up of 30 months. Yang even reported one case of tumor regression with no treatment8. In contrast, there also are reports of cases with only a few months of survival9,10 related to RANBP2-ALK gene rearrangement, metastatic hepatic presentation after excision of the primary pelvic tumor, and advanced age. Resections with free margins and ALK positivity are related with a better prognosis3. The attached Table 1 summarizes the evolution of the patients that appear in the bibliography used.

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics and evolution of the patients included in the bibliography used to support the present article and in additional articles.

Article  Age  Sex  Type of presentation  Treatment  Follow-up  Disease-free survival  Survival 
Watanabe et al.2  70  Female  Incidental after trauma injury  Right hepatectomy  7 months  No recurrence  Living 
Filips et al.3  32  Female  Right hypochondrium pain and fever 4 months post-partum  Segmentectomy (IVa and IVb)  1 year  No recurrence  Living 
Sekaran et al.4  17  Female  Melenas, jaundice and abdominal pain for 18 months  Left hepatectomy  6 weeks  No recurrence  Living 
Jim et al.5  42  Female  Fever and fatigue for 1 month  Right posterior sectionectomy  32 months  No recurrence  Living 
Khalil et al.6  Male  Liver metastasis 6 months after resection o < f IMT in the right iliac fossa  Crizotinib  6 months  No recurrence  Living 
Tang et al.774  Male  Fever  Segmentectomy V  Mean follow-up 30 monthsNo recurrence  Living 
45  Female  Fever  Segmentectomy VII  No recurrence  Living 
59  Male  Fever and Abdominal pain  Segmentectomy IV y VIII  No recurrence  Living 
53  Female  Abdominal pain  Segmentectomy V  No recurrence  Living 
45  Male  Abdominal pain  Segmentectomy VI  No recurrence  Living 
Chen et al.9  34  Male  Weight loss and abdominal pain in the right hypochondrium  Segmentectomy V-VI  6 months  Recurrence (5 months)  Exitus 
Shimodaira et al.10  81  Male  Pelvic IMT, treated with Miles procedure. Liver metastasis 2 months after surgery.  Surveillance  3 months  Recurrence (2 months)  Exitus 
Sinha et al.  36  Female  Inflammatory mass compromising the gall bladder, liver, pylorus and first part of the duodenum  Extended cholecystectomy with resection of the pylorus and first portion of the duodenum; Billroth II reconstruction  No  No information  No information 
Shang et al.  56  Female  Liver transplantation due to cirrhosis secondary to hepatitis B virus. 5 months after transplantation, she presented melena secondary to esophageal varices and a mass was detected in the porta hepatis; the biopsy confirmed IMT.  Conservative treatment: steroids, antibiotics, antiviral agents, immunosuppression and endoscopic ligation of varices  1 month  Recurrence (1 month)  Exitus 
Raad et al.  62  Female  History of endometrial carcinoma. Follow-up imaging study detected lesion in liver segment II compatible with metastasis. The anatomopathological study after resection showed it was IMT.  Subsegmentectomy II  No  No information  No information 
Nagarajan et al.  Male  Hepatomegaly and anemia; mass detected in left liver lobe  Initial follow-up (suspected hamartoma); after 8 months, surgical resection due to persistent symptoms and mass  12 months  No recurrence  Living 
Sürer et al.  48  Male  Pain in right hypochondrium, fever and weight loss  Surgical resection of 6-cm lesion in the right liver lobe  No  No information  Living 
Berumen et al.  13  Male  Painless jaundice, asthenia; mass in hepatic hilum invading the bifurcation of both hepatic ducts, hepatic artery, portal vein, extending to the duodenum and head of pancreas.  Transhepatic biliary drainage and chemotherapy with Crizotinib; hepatotoxicity, so change to Celecoxib.  12 months  No recurrence  Living 
        After 6 months, surgery is considered, but the mass is confirmed to be unresectable.       
        4 months later, liver transplantation is done with pancreaticoduodenectomy.       
Thavamani et al.  10  Female  Abdominal pain and fever; 5.6-cm mass in porta hepatis causing secondary portal hypertension (portal thrombosis, collateral circulation, splenomegaly)  Exploratory laparotomy, biopsy with diagnosis of IMT; treatment with Meloxicam and prednisone, with reduction of tumor size in 2 years.  2 years  Disease persists after diagnosis  Living 
Chablé-Montero et al.  23  Female  Right hypochondrium pain, fever; 7 cm mass in right liver lobe, suspected liver abscess  Antibiotic therapy; given the persistence of the lesion and symptoms, right hepatectomy is performed.  No  No information  No information 
Schnelldorfer et al.  18  Female  Right hypochondrium pain, vomiting, weight loss; liver lesion causes left biliary dilatation.  Left lateral sectionectomy  1 year  No recurrence  Living 
Solomon et al.  26  Male  Right hypochondrium pain, asthenia, weight loss  Partial left hepatectomy  No  No information  No information 

Note: The series by Yang et al.8 is not included in the table because it does not provide individual data for the patients in the original article.

Additional references to those present in the bibliography of the manuscript included in the table:

- Sinha et al. International Journal of Surgery Case Reports 31 (2017) 27–29.

- Shang et al. Medicine (2017) 96:49.

- Raad et al. Clin Nucl Med 2021;46: 47–48.

- Nagarajan et al. JPGN 2013;57: 277–280.

- Sürer et al. Turk J Gastroenterol 2009; 20 (2): 129-134.

- Berumen et al. Pediatric Transplantation 2016; 1–6.

- Thavamani et al. ACG Case Rep J 2019;6:1–4.

- Chablé-Montero et al. Ann Hepatol. Sep-Oct 2012;11(5):708-9.

- Schnelldorfer et al. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg (2007) 14:421–423.

- Solomon et al. Arch Pathol Lab Med (2006) 130 (10): 1548–1551.

In conclusion, whenever possible, surgical treatment seems preferable, given its intermediate biological potential. Long-term follow-up is recommended and, in case of recurrence, good response to treatment with crizotinib has been described, mainly in cases with ALK expression6.

References
[1]
B. Blechacz.
Cholangiocarcinoma: current knowledge and new developments.
Gut Liver., 11 (2017), pp. 13-26
[2]
J. Watanabe, S. Yamada, Y. Sasaguri, X. Guo, N. Kurose, K. Kitada, et al.
A surgical case of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the liver: potentially characteristic gross features.
Clin Med Insights Oncol., 13 (2019),
[3]
A. Filips, M.H. Maurer, M. Montani, G. Beldi, A. Lachenmayer.
Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the liver: a case report and review of literature.
World J Hepatol., 12 (2020), pp. 170-183
[4]
A. Sekaran, S. Lakhtakia, R. Pradeep, D. Santosh, R. Gupta, M. Tandan, et al.
Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of biliary tract presenting as recurrent GI bleed (with video).
Gastrointest Endosc., 63 (2006), pp. 1077-1079
[5]
Y.W. Jim, F.Y. Li, N.S. Cheng.
Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor: an unusual tumor mimicking livernabscess.
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol., 41 (2017), pp. 243-245
[6]
S. Khalil, T. Ghafoor, A.K.F. Raja.
Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor: a rare presentation and an effective treatment with crizotinib.
Case Rep Oncol Med., 2020 (2020),
[7]
L. Tang, E.C. Lai, W.M. Cong, A.J. Li, S.Y. Fu, Z.Y. Pan, et al.
Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the liver: a cohort study.
World J Surg., 34 (2010), pp. 309-313
[8]
X. Yang, R. Miao, H. Yang, T. Chi, C. Jiang, X. Wan, et al.
Retrospective and comparative study of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the liver.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol., 30 (2015), pp. 885-890
[9]
S.T. Chen, J.C. Lee.
An inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor in liver with ALK and RANBP2 gene rearrangement: combination of distinct morphologic, immunohistochemical, and genetic features.
Hum Pathol., 39 (2008), pp. 1854-1858
[10]
Y. Shimodaira, K. Sugawara, S. Fukuda, Y. Suzuki, N. Watanabe, S. Koizumi, et al.
Aggressive inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor without anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene rearrangement in the rectum with liver metastasis.
Intern Med., 59 (2020), pp. 495-499

Please cite this article as: Hinojosa Arco LC, Roldán de la Rúa JF, Arranz Salas I, Gómez Pérez R, Suárez Muñoz MÁ. Tumor miofibroblástico inflamatorio hepático que mimetiza un tumor de Klatskin. Cir Esp. 2023;101:303–307.

Copyright © 2022. AEC
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos