metricas
covid
Buscar en
Cirugía Española (English Edition)
Toda la web
Inicio Cirugía Española (English Edition) The use of mixed reality in the preoperative planning of colorectal surgery: Pre...
Información de la revista
Vol. 102. Núm. S1.
Digital Surgery
Páginas S36-S44 (julio 2024)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Visitas
304
Vol. 102. Núm. S1.
Digital Surgery
Páginas S36-S44 (julio 2024)
Special article
Acceso a texto completo
The use of mixed reality in the preoperative planning of colorectal surgery: Preliminary experience with a narrative review
El uso de realidad mixta en la planificación preoperatoria de la cirugía colorrectal: Experiencia preliminar con una revisión narrativa
Visitas
304
Umberto Bracalea, Biancamaria Iaconeb,
Autor para correspondencia
biancamariaiacone@gmail.com

Corresponding author.
, Anna Tedescob, Antonio Gargiulob, Maria Michela Di Nuzzob, Daniele Sanninob, Salvatore Tramontanoa, Francesco Corcioneb
a Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84084 Salerno, Italy
b Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Resumen
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Figuras (5)
Mostrar másMostrar menos
Tablas (2)
Table 1. Details of the included studies.
Table 2. Our experience, patient characteristics.
Mostrar másMostrar menos
Suplemento especial
Este artículo forma parte de:
Vol. 102. Núm S1

Digital Surgery

Más datos
Abstract

New advanced technologies have recently been developed and preliminarily applied to surgery, including virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR) and mixed reality (MR). We retrospectively review all colorectal cases in which we used holographic 3D reconstruction from February 2020 to December 2022. This innovative approach was used to identify vascular anomalies, pinpoint tumor locations, evaluate infiltration into neighboring organs and devise surgical plans for both training and educating trainee assistants. We have also provided a state-of-the-art analysis, briefly highlighting what has been stated by the scientific literature to date. VR facilitates training and anatomical assessments, while AR enhances training and laparoscopic performance evaluations. MR, powered by HoloLens, enriches anatomic recognition, navigation, and visualization. Successful implementation was observed in 10 colorectal cancer cases, showcasing the effectiveness of MR in improving preoperative planning and its intraoperative application. This technology holds significant promise for advancing colorectal surgery by elevating safety and reliability standards.

Keywords:
Virtual reality
Augmented reality
Mixed reality
3D reconstructions
Surgical planning
Holograms
Colorectal surgery
Resumen

Recientemente, se desarrollaron nuevas tecnologías avanzadas que se aplicaron preliminarmente a la cirugía, como la realidad virtual (RV), la realidad aumentada (RA) y la realidad mixta (RM). Revisamos retrospectivamente todos los casos de cirugía colorrectal en los que utilizamos, desdefebrero de 2020 hasta diciembre de 2022, una reconstrucción holográfica en 3D. Este enfoqueinnovador tuvo como objetivo identificar anomalías vasculares, señalar ubicaciones de tumores, evaluar la infiltración en órganos vecinos y diseñar planes quirúrgicos tanto para el entrenamientocomo para la formación de asistentes en entrenamiento. También proporcionamos un análisis de última generación hasta ahora, resaltando brevemente lo que ha sido mencionado por la literaturacientífica hasta el momento. La RV facilita el entrenamiento y las evaluaciones anatómicas, mientras que la RA mejora el entrenamiento y las evaluaciones del rendimiento laparoscópico. La RM, impulsada por HoloLens, enriquece el reconocimiento anatómico, la navegación y la visualización. Se observó una implementación exitosa en 10 casos de cáncer colorrectal, demostrando la efectividad de la RM en la mejora de la planificación preoperatoria y su aplicaciónintraoperatoria. Esta tecnología tiene un gran potencial para avanzar en la cirugía colorrectal al elevar los estándares de seguridad y confiabilidad.

Palabras clave:
Realidad virtual
Realidad aumentada
Realidad mixta
Reconstrucciones en 3D
Planificación quirúrgica
Hologramas
Cirugía colorrectal
Texto completo
Introduction

Elective gastrointestinal surgery is usually performed using a minimally invasive approach, by experienced surgeons. Several advantages have been attributed to laparoscopy in terms of postoperative morbidity and length of hospital stay.1 In malignant disease, a preoperative plan based on clinical, radiological, and endoscopic assessments is needed to better understand the vascular anatomy, tumor location or node involvement and to facilitate the surgical procedure. As laparoscopy has some inherent drawbacks compared to open surgery, such as limited tactile feedback and the inability to perform transillumination tests, a comprehensive evaluation of the patient’s condition can decrease intraoperative complications and improve surgical planning.2

For instance, the vascular anatomy of the right colon varies considerably among patients.3,4 Similarly, there is a non-negligible discrepancy between preoperative diagnostic procedures and intraoperative findings.2,5 Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are considered the gold standard for preoperative planning. However, they provide 2D visualization of patient anatomy, causing possible inconsistencies between what is preoperatively observed and what is found intraoperatively.5 Furthermore, these images can be difficult to interpret, especially for surgical trainees.

Recently, advances made in image analysis technology have led to the development of various surgical simulations and navigation systems based on 3-dimensional (3D) image construction. Patient-specific virtual models are generated from cross-sectional imaging studies, such as CT and MRI scans.6

These models can be visualized using virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), and mixed reality (MR). This technology has found extensive use in medical disciplines, such as orthopedics, urology, and hepato-pancreatic surgery.7–11 However, its utilization in colorectal surgery still remains limited.

The visualization of 3D models could provide more information regarding vascular anatomy, tumor location and infiltration, aiding young and inexperienced surgeons to plan their interventions.12,13 Additionally, 3D reconstructions can be used for intraoperative navigation, providing real-time assessment.

The aim of the present study is to describe our preliminary experience using preoperative holographic mixed reality, describing its potential applications and advantages in the setting of gastrointestinal surgery. We also provide a state-of-the-art analysis of the scientific literature to date (Table 1).

Table 1.

Details of the included studies.

Author  Year  Type of reality  Participants  Radiological modality  Tumor localization  Surgical procedure  Application  Main findings 
Andersen et al.  2021  VR  32  CT  Colorectal cancer  Right/left colectomy  MCA bifurcation anatomy  The wide range of possible MCA bifurcation positions makes 3D models valuable for surgeons, enabling precise identification of vascular structures. 
Maki et al.  2016  VR  331  CT  Colon cancer  Transverse colectomy  Preoperative planning  3DCTA is useful in evaluating the anatomic variants of the MCV in preoperative planning for laparoscopic surgery. 
Leblanc et al.  2010  AR  29  CT/MRI  Colorectal cancer  Laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy  Using AR to compare HAL approach with SL  The improved scores with the hand-assisted approach (HAL) suggest that, with this simulator. A hand-assisted model may be technically easier to perform. 
Guerriero et al.  2018  VR  CT  Diverticular disease and colon cancer  Left and right hemicolectomy  Assessment of vascular anatomy  Virtual reality can provide an enhanced understanding of crucial anatomical details, both preoperatively and intraoperatively, which could contribute to improve safety in colorectal surgery. 
Soriero et al.  2022  3D reconstruction/VR  14  CT/MRI/colonoscopy  Colorectal cancer  Colon resection  Colorectal lesion localization  The 3D models could present good potential to improve lesion localization and help surgical planning, especially in difficult cases. 
Leblanc et al.  2010  AR  38  CT/MRI  Colorectal cancer  Laparoscopic sigmoid colectomies  Using AR to compare HAL approach with SL  A HAL approach for sigmoid colectomy accelerated colonic mobilization and anastomosis. 
Ryu et al.  2022  MR  13  CT/holograms  Colorectal cancer  Laparoscopic surgery  Preoperative anatomical study  The use of mixed reality, compared to preoperative 3D reconstruction alone, in complex colorectal surgery has resulted in improved surgical performance, enhanced anatomical clarity, reduced cognitive demand, maintained sterility and 3D visualization. 
Luzon et al.  2019  VR  24  CT  Colon cancer  Right colectomy  Preoperative anatomical study  The vast majority of SAM did not contain all SMAV branches relevant to the surgeon performing right colectomy with extended D3 mesenterectomy. 
Nepal et al.  2021  VR  167  CT  Colorectal cancer  Left colectomy  Preoperative anatomical study  3D-CT angiography is useful for the preoperative assessment of vascular anatomical variations of the IMV and IMA for safe intraoperative navigation and prevention of complications during laparoscopy-assisted left-sided colorectal surgery. 
Matsuhashi et al.  2022  VR  CT  Rectal cancer  Lateral lymph node dissection  Images of pelvic anatomy (especially vascular anatomy)  SYNAPSE VINCENT aids in the identification of vascular anomalies and aids in lymph node dissection. 
Horie et al.  2018  VR  10  CT  Rectal cancer  Laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLD)  Anatomic reconstruction for preoperative planning  Preoperative 3D simulation may be useful to safely perform laparoscopic LPLD, especially for surgeons with limited prior experience. 
Raghupathi et al.  2004  VR  None  Computer modelling  Colorectal cancer  None  Training  The novel anatomical model greatly simplifies the problem of simulating a complex deformable organ in real time. 
Luzon et al.  2020  MR  CT/holograms  Colorectal cancer  Open right colectomy with CME  Vascular anatomy and extended lymphadenectomy  The effective on precision can be evaluated based on the surgeon’s sightline, which improves when it is perpendicular in all directions (smaller TED). 
Fletcher et al.  2021  3D reconstruction/VR  15  CT  Colorectal cancer  Right colectomy and CME  Vascular anatomy and extended lymphadenectomy  Higher scores of anatomical and vascular understanding for young surgeons performing right hemicolectomy and complete mesocolic excision (CME). 
Huber et al.  2019  MR  CT  Colorectal cancer  Robotic TaTME  Training and preoperative planning   
Methods

We have retrospectively reviewed all colorectal cases in which we used holographic 3D reconstruction for preoperative planning of patients with colorectal tumors from February 2020 to December 2022. We used Virtual Reality Exploration, a technology that has been previously used by others for gastrointestinal tract surgery.14 The aim of our study was to identify any vascular anomalies, locate the tumor, assess its infiltration to surrounding organs, and evaluate surgical plans for training and educational purposes for trainee assistants. We have also provided a state-of-the-art analysis that briefly highlights what has been published in the scientific literature to date.

We used ARTICOR® software, which was developed to generate pre- and intra-operative simulations of patient-specific 3D models with mixed reality interaction technologies. In our specific case, the images were acquired from CT scans and processed through an experimental semi-automatic procedure, enabling 3D reconstruction of the patient’s anatomy and resulting in a three-dimensional holographic model.15,16

ARTICOR® also allows for multi-user sessions of holographic models to be shared for the discussion of clinical cases, utilizing a simulation tool — in our case, the HoloLens 217 — which enables interaction with holograms through instinctive gestures, like manipulating real-world objects. All of this is made possible using a Time of Flight (ToF) depth sensor, coupled with integrated artificial intelligence and semantic understanding. The presence of Windows Hello authentication recognition further facilitates sharing the viewer among multiple operators. This type of viewer allows for 2 types of interaction: augmented reality (AR) and mixed reality (MR), thanks to the powerful Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 processor it is equipped with. The optics feature transparent holographic lenses with a resolution of 2K, allowing for a holographic density of 47 pixels per degree of vision, which doubles the field of view compared to its previous version. It is equipped with head and eye tracking, an accelerometer, gyroscope, magnetometer, an 8 MP camera, as well as Wi-Fi 802.11 ac, Bluetooth 5.0, and USB-C connectivity.

ResultsDefinition and description of VR, AR and MR with a narrative review3D virtual reality

VR is an all-enveloping artificial and fully immersive experience, which completely integrates the user into a computer-generated environment.7 A fundamental role of VR is its training function, and 2 studies delve into this aspect.18,19 VR is increasingly playing a crucial role in medical schools and specialized training as a means of education and training. Vertemati et al.18 has stated that VR training was better than none. The comparison between VR and video trainers was statistically in favor of VR; likewise, Raghupathi et al.19 have also stated that VR simulator platforms can significantly help young surgeons and medical residents acquire the necessary surgical skills in a low-cost manner. The training function of VR is further emphasized as it is useful both in anatomical assessment, particularly for identifying vascular abnormalities, and in surgical planning. Other authors12,20,21 have reported the importance and advantages of VR in the preoperative identification of vascular anomalies concerning the ascending and transverse colon. Andersen et al.20 have discussed the utility of VR in preoperatively identifying anatomical variations involving the middle colic artery. As highlighted in previous articles,20,21 the positive contribution of 3D reconstruction is emphasized when used for anatomical understanding (particularly vascular) in patients with ascending colon carcinoma undergoing right hemicolectomy and complete mesocolic excision (CME). The same is reported for left colon anatomy, in which Nepal and Guerriero et al.12,14 emphasize that 3D-CT angiography is useful for the preoperative assessment of vascular anatomical variations of the IMV and IMA. They concluded that this technology seems to be useful for safe intraoperative navigation and prevention of complications during laparoscopy in left colorectal surgery.11,13 Other studies reported the utility of VR in preoperative planning and tailoring lymphadenectomy based on the specific anatomy of each patient.22–24 Also, Soriero et al.25 reported that the use of 3D models could present good potential to improve tumor localization and help surgical planning, especially in difficult cases.

Augmented reality

AR refers to a concept of superimposing visual information onto the user’s field of vision using, for instance, head-mounted displays (HMD) or glasses.7

Leblanc et al. have employed augmented reality (AR) in 2 distinct studies.26,27 In both studies, the trainees were asked to perform 2 laparoscopic sigmoid colectomies on an AR simulator (ProMIS 2.5, Haptica, Dublin, Ireland), randomly starting with either the straight laparoscopic (SL) or hand-assisted laparoscopic (HAL) approach. In the first study, the utilization of AR was able to assess differences between the 2 techniques in terms of errors and operative time, demonstrating how the HAL approach can expedite the mobilization and anastomosis of the colon. In the second study, they highlighted the need for a period of adaptation to the simulator to enhance simulated laparoscopic performance. However, only 2 articles were identified regarding the use of AR in colorectal surgery. This is likely attributed to the widespread utilization of AR for training purposes among trainees, who primarily use augmented reality simulators for performing simple exercises.

Mixed reality

MR takes the AR concept one step further compared to VR and AR by spatially correlating the real environment with digital objects.7 In the case of HoloLens, it overlays images onto a scene or object behind the display, which are referred to as “holograms”.16 HoloLens is operated with hand gestures and voice commands, enabling surgeons to view 3D holographic images of a patient’s anatomy created from X-rays or other scans, for example CT. Surgeons can move those virtual images around to see them from different angles.

To date, MR with the introduction of HoloLens has gained more attention in various surgical fields as it is commercially available and capable of adding new layers of information regarding surgical anatomy. At the same time, some studies are interested in evaluating its accuracy and precision. Luzon et al.22 have assessed this aspect, evaluating the use of mixed reality navigator for open surgery (MRNOS) by 6 surgeons during right colectomy with extended lymphadenectomy, introducing an important perceptual variable for evaluating surgical accuracy and precision: the surgeon’s sightline. The surgeon’s line of sight is an imaginary line between the surgeon’s eye and the target/hologram. The efficacy and performance were assessed in terms of target error distance (TED), measured in millimeters. A TED value between 0 and 0.5 mm was considered to have hit the bullseye. In the results, if the surgeon was able to maintain a perpendicular position relative to the operating table in both steps and along all axes, the TED was lower, indicating higher accuracy and precision, while also indicating the perpendicular position as the optimal position. Ryu et al.28 investigated the feasibility and potential of holograms for intraoperative navigation in colorectal cancer, comparing this with 3D reconstruction alone. The study included 13 patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery. The surgical outcomes were found to be comparable in both groups. In all cases, laparoscopic surgery was performed safely while observing the hologram, which the surgeon could manipulate and still maintain sterility. This approach provided better visualization, particularly in patients undergoing right hemicolectomy, where there was greater anatomical variability. Senior surgeons exhibited significantly lower scores compared to junior surgeons in terms of workload, mental demands, time required, and effort. However, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of physical exertion, performance, and frustration scores. Similarly, Huber et al.29 reported how the use of MR facilitates the surgical field in a patient undergoing robotic transanal total mesorectal excision. This applies to both experienced surgeons and surgeons-in-training, improving surgical precision, spatial awareness, intraoperative navigation, personalized surgical planning, and enhancing interaction among the surgical team. Additionally, the perceived workload (NASA TLX) was reported to be very low for all participants.

Our preliminary experience

We used holographic 3D reconstruction and MR visualization in 10 complex cases of colorectal cancer, utilizing the HoloLens MD System (Table 2).

Table 2.

Our experience, patient characteristics.

Year  Patient  Age  Pathology  Type of surgery  Use  Year 
2021  53  Colorectal cancer  Anterior resection  Vascular anomalies  2021 
2022  81  Colorectal cancer  Extended left hemicolectomy  Vascular anomalies  2022 
2021  59  Colorectal cancer  Extended left hemicolectomy  Vascular anomalies  2020 
2021  71  Colorectal cancer  Rectum anterior resection  Vascular anomalies  2021 
2022  70  Colorectal cancer  Left hemicolectomy  Vascular anomalies  2022 
2021  39  Colorectal cancer  Right hemicolectomy  Tumor localization  2020 
2021  48  Colorectal cancer  Right hemicolectomy  Tumor localization  2021 
2022  64  Colorectal cancer  Left hemicolectomy  Tumor localization  2022 
2022  46  Colorectal cancer  Right hemicolectomy  Locoregional invasion  2022 
2021  57  Colorectal cancer  Anterior resection  Locoregional invasion  2020 

In 3 of these cases, it was used to identify vascular anomalies, including one of the first colorectal cases in which we used mixed reality. The holograms were very useful to identify the lack of left colic artery and very high splenic flexure, which we have observed in another 2 cases. This information changed our surgical approach, preserving the inferior mesenteric artery during left colectomy for diverticular disease. In 3 other cases, it was used for the accurate localization of a tumor. In one patient, the initial tumor location indicated by CT was in the descending colon, but 3D reconstruction later confirmed the location in the splenic flexure, which resulted in a change of surgical approach from left hemicolectomy to splenic flexure resection. In 2 cases, we used the technique to evaluate locoregional invasion of rectal cancer, and in a young male patient, it was used to evaluate the extent of mesorectal invasion, which was not clearly visible on MRI (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

3D reconstruction of rectal adenocarcinoma.

(0.33MB).

In another case, a patient with right colon adenocarcinoma, on CT scan appeared to be invading the liver; with the assistance of mixed reality, subtracting the surrounding organs, it was then observed and demonstrated that it was not involved (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

3D reconstruction of right adenocarcinoma.

(0.3MB).
Discussion

The analysis of images and pre/intraoperative surgical navigation are continuously evolving, and their application fields have expanded beyond medical disciplines to include surgical branches such as urology, orthopedics, and maxillofacial surgery. However, for digestive surgery, this technology is still under development. It has gained increasing recognition in the surgery of the parenchymal organs, such as the liver, but its role in colorectal surgery, specifically its potential benefits in oncologic surgery of the colon and rectum, has still not been defined. We have identified the current fields of application for these new technologies, and this can be helpful to all surgeons. The use of 3D reconstruction and 3D printers has been well documented in the literature.5,7,28 However, these methods have specific limitations, including the cost of materials and the inability of surgeons to interact with the reconstructions. This limitation is easily overcome by MR, particularly compared to the 2 other possible visualizations, VR and AR. MR allows the surgeon to interact with the 3D model while maintaining sterility and without leaving the surgical field. Using the HoloLens MD system, the surgeon can modify the hologram, viewing only what they want to see, subtracting, moving, and changing their perspective (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Hologram superimposed on the patient in the operation room.

(0.24MB).

The application of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer has expanded to complex and challenging cases. These new technologies are easy to use and do not increase the workload.28,29 They have been found to play an increasingly important role in preoperative planning, better and accurate tumor localization, assessment of actual invasiveness, and identification of defined surgical dissection planes (Fig. 4). They enhance training and education for younger and inexperienced surgeons, providing a deeper understanding of anatomy, particularly vascular anatomy, in regions where there is a higher incidence of vascular anomalies, such as the ascending colon.11,13,28 Furthermore, the hologram and the modifications made by the surgeon can be shared wirelessly with multiple individuals, making them useful in conferences among surgical teams and in the training of young doctors, providing in-depth understanding prior to the procedure, tailored to each patient. In our experience, we have used MR visualization in complex cases and before certain live surgeries to identify vascular anomalies, obtain more accurate localization of a tumor, and assess tumor extension. We can affirm that all the listed applications have proven to be effective, making surgery safer and more reliable. In addition, preoperative identification of vascular anomalies, which are quite common, especially in the right colon, facilitates safer vascular dissection and reduces the risk of bleeding.

Fig. 4.

Hologram visualization for preoperative planning.

(0.13MB).

Moreover, preoperative information about splenic flexure configuration and descending colon length could change the surgical strategy, for example, in surgeons with different strategies during anterior resection of the rectum.

In conclusion, the use of 3D models and holograms enable better preoperative planning and could potentially be used during the intraoperative phase. In our opinion, the application of these technologies in colorectal surgery could be promising.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Use generative artificial intelligence (AI) and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process

None.

Financial support

None.

References
[1]
L. Lorenzon, M. La Torre, V. Ziparo, F. Montebelli, P. Mercantini, G. Balducci, et al.
Evidence based medicine and surgical approaches for colon cancer: evidences, benefits and limitations of the laparoscopic vs open resection.
World J Gastroenterol, 20 (2014), pp. 3680-3692
[2]
Y.B. Cho, W.Y. Lee, H.R. Yun, W.S. Lee, S.H. Yun, H.K. Chun.
Tumor localization for laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
World J Surg, 31 (2007), pp. 1491-1495
[3]
M. Haywood, C. Molyneux, V. Mahadevan, N. Srinivasaiah.
Right colic artery anatomy: a systematic review of cadaveric studies.
Tech Coloproctol, 21 (2017), pp. 937-943
[4]
R. Peltrini, G. Luglio, G. Pagano, M. Sacco, V. Sollazzo, L. Bucci.
Gastrocolic trunk of Henle and its variants: review of the literature and clinical relevance in colectomy for right-sided colon cancer.
Surg Radiol Anat, 41 (2019), pp. 879-887
[5]
J.G. Solon, D. Al-Azawi, A. Hill, J. Deasy, D.A. McNamara.
Colonoscopy and computerized tomography scan are not sufficient to localize right-sided colonic lesions accurately.
Colorectal Dis, 12 (2010), pp. e267-e272
[6]
M.M. Maher, M.K. Kalra, D.V. Sahani, J.J. Perumpillichira, S. Rizzo, S. Saini, et al.
Techniques, clinical applications and limitations of 3D reconstruction in CT of the abdomen.
Korean J Radiol, 5 (2004), pp. 55-67
[7]
I.M. Sauer, M. Queisner, P. Tang, S. Moosburner, O. Hoepfner, R. Horner, et al.
Mixed reality in visceral surgery: development of a suitable workflow and evaluation of intraoperative use-cases.
Ann Surg, 266 (2017), pp. 706-712
[8]
C. Du, J. Li, B. Zhang, W. Feng, T. Zhang, D. Li.
Intraoperative navigation system with a multi-modality fusion of 3D virtual model and laparoscopic real-time images in laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: a preclinical study.
[9]
Y. Saito, M. Sugimoto, S. Imura, Y. Morine, T. Ikemoto, S. Iwahashi, et al.
Intraoperative 3D hologram support with mixed reality techniques in liver surgery.
Ann Surg, 271 (2020), pp. e4-e7
[10]
J.T. Verhey, J.M. Haglin, E.M. Verhey, D.E. Hartigan.
Virtual, augmented, and mixed reality applications in orthopedic surgery.
Int J Med Robot, 16 (2020), pp. e2067
[11]
P. Sparwasser, M. Haack, L. Frey, A. Haferkamp, H. Borgmann.
Virtual und augmented reality in der urologie [Virtual and augmented reality in urology].
Urologe A, 61 (2022), pp. 133-141
[12]
P. Nepal, S. Mori, Y. Kita, K. Tanabe, K. Baba, K. Sasaki, et al.
Anatomical study of the inferior mesenteric vein using three-dimensional computed tomography angiography in laparoscopy-assisted surgery for left-sided colorectal cancer.
Surg Today, 51 (2021), pp. 1665-1670
[13]
Y. Maki, M. Mizutani, M. Morimoto, T. Kawai, M. Nakagawa, Y. Ozawa, et al.
The variations of the middle colic vein tributaries: depiction by three-dimensional CT angiography.
Br J Radiol, 89 (2016), pp. 20150841
[14]
L. Guerriero, G. Quero, M. Diana, L. Soler, V. Agnus, J. Marescaux, F. Corcione.
Virtual reality exploration and planning for precision colorectal surgery.
Dis Colon Rectum, 61 (2018), pp. 719-723
[15]
O. Pappalardo, M. Pasquali, A. Maltagliati, G. Rossini, G. Italiano, L. Fusini, et al.
A platform for real-3D visualization and planning of left atrial appendage occlusion through mixed reality.
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 22 (2021), pp. 2047-2404
[16]
G. Butera, F. Sturla, F.R. Pluchinotta, A. Caimi, M. Carminati.
Holographic augmented reality and 3D printing for advanced planning of sinus venosus ASD/partial anomalous pulmonary venous return percutaneous management.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 12 (2019), pp. 1389-1391
[17]
A. Palumbo.
Microsoft HoloLens 2 in medical and healthcare context: state of the art and future prospects.
Sensors (Basel), 22 (2022), pp. 7709
[18]
M. Vertemati, S. Cassin, F. Rizzetto, A. Vanzulli, M. Elli, G. Sampogna, et al.
A virtual reality environment to visualize three-dimensional patient-specific models by a mobile head-mounted display.
Surg Innov, 26 (2019), pp. 359-370
[19]
L. Raghupathi, L. Grisoni, F. Faure, D. Marchal, M.P. Cani, C. Chaillou.
An intestinal surgery simulator: real-time collision processing and visualization.
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph, 10 (2004), pp. 708-718
[20]
D. Andersen, V. Popescu, M.E. Cabrera, A. Shanghavi, G. Gomez, S. Marley, et al.
Medical telementoring using an augmented reality transparent display.
Surgery, 159 (2016), pp. 1646-1653
[21]
J. Fletcher, R. Ilangovan, G. Hanna, D. Miskovic, P. Lung.
The impact of three-dimensional reconstruction and standardised CT interpretation (AMIGO) on the anatomical understanding of mesenteric vascular anatomy for planning complete mesocolic excision surgery: a randomised crossover study.
Colorectal Dis, 24 (2022), pp. 388-400
[22]
J.A. Luzon, B.V. Stimec, A.O. Bakka, B. Edwin, D. Ignjatovic.
Value of the surgeon’s sightline on hologram registration and targeting in mixed reality.
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg, 15 (2020), pp. 2027-2039
[23]
N. Matsuhashi, Y. Sato, J.Y. Tajima, S. Kiyama, T. Takahashi, M. Kuno, et al.
Evaluation of the SYNAPSE VINCENT for lateral lymph node dissection in rectal cancer with robotic surgery: a preliminary report.
World J Surg Oncol, 20 (2022), pp. 56
[24]
H. Horie, K. Koinuma, H. Ito, A. Sadatomo, D. Naoi, Y. Kono, et al.
Utility of preoperative 3-D simulation of laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for advanced rectal cancer: surgical outcomes of 10 initial cases.
Asian J Endosc Surg, 11 (2018), pp. 355-361
[25]
D. Soriero, P. Batistotti, R. Malinaric, D. Pertile, A. Massobrio, L. Epis, et al.
Efficacy of high-resolution preoperative 3D reconstructions for lesion localization in oncological colorectal surgery-first pilot study.
Healthcare (Basel), 10 (2022), pp. 900
[26]
F. Leblanc, C.P. Delaney, P.C. Neary, J. Rose, K.M. Augestad, A.J. Senagore, et al.
Assessment of comparative skills between hand-assisted and straight laparoscopic colorectal training on an augmented reality simulator.
Dis Colon Rectum, 53 (2010), pp. 1323-1327
[27]
F. Leblanc, C.P. Delaney, C.N. Ellis, P.C. Neary, B.J. Champagne, A.J. Senagore.
Hand-assisted versus straight laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy on a training simulator: what is the difference? A stepwise comparison of hand-assisted versus straight laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy performance on an augmented reality simulator.
World J Surg, 34 (2010), pp. 2909-2914
[28]
S. Ryu, T. Kitagawa, K. Goto, A. Okamoto, R. Marukuchi, K. Hara, et al.
Intraoperative holographic guidance using virtual reality and mixed reality technology during laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery.
Anticancer Res, 42 (2022), pp. 4849-4856
[29]
T. Huber, E. Hadzijusufovic, C. Hansen, M. Paschold, H. Lang, W. Kneist.
Head-mounted mixed-reality technology during robotic-assisted transanal total mesorectal excision.
Dis Colon Rectum, 62 (2019), pp. 258-261
Copyright © 2024. The Author(s)
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos