Resultados de la conización cervical con asa

Andía, D.; Castro, N. Ruiz-López de; Villegas, I.; Marqués, M.; Rui-Wamba, M.J.; Juarros, B.

doi:10.1016/S0210-573X(01)77114-6

Información del artículo

Resumen

Bibliografía

Descargar PDF

Estadísticas

Resumen

Objetivos

Evaluar los resultados de la técnica de conización con asa en nuestro servicio, las complicaciones y el seguimiento de esas pacientes.

Material y métodos

Se han estudiado 77 pacientes que requieren conización con asa por lesión escamosa intraepitelial de alto grado (SILAG), SIL BG persistente, discordancia citologíabiopsia, sospecha de carcinoma microinvasor o de adenocarcinoma endocervical. Evaluamos las complicaciones y el seguimiento citológico a los 6 meses

Resultados

El 74% de las pacientes presentaba SIL en la pieza de conización, en el 20,7% no se observólesión, en el 2,6% se localizó carcinoma microinvasor y en el 1,35% carcinoma invasor y endocervical

Conclusión

La concordancia es mayor cuando se trata de lesiones de alto grado. Las complicacionesson escasas, destacando un 7,6% de hemorragia. El seguimiento citológico muestra, a los 6 meses, una persistencia de lesión del 11,4%

Summary

Objectives

To evaluate the results of the technique of conization with a loop in our service, the complications and follow-up of these patients.

Material and methods

A study of 77 patients who required loop conization for high grade intraepithelial squamous lesions (HG SIL), and persistent LG SIL, cytology-biopsy discordance, suspicions of microin-vasive carcinoma or endocervical adenocarcinoma. We evaluate complications and follow-up at 6 months.

Results

A 77% of the patients had SIL in the coni-zation specimen, in 20,7% no lesion was seen, in 2,6% there was a microinvasive carcinoma, and in 1,35% invasive and endocervical carcinoma.

Conclusion

Concordance is greater when the lesions are high grade. Complications are scarce, only a 7,6% rate of haemorrhage being found. Cytological follow-up at 6 months showing a lesion persistence of 11,4%.

El Texto completo está disponible en PDF

Bibliografía

[1.]

R. Cartier.

Practical colposcopy en2.

pp. 139-156

[2.]

W. Prendiville, J. Cullimore, S. Norman.

Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ). A new method of management for women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 96 (1989), pp. 1054-1060

Medline

[3.]

W. Prendiville.

Ablación de la zona de transformación con un asa grande.

Clin Obstet Ginecol, 3 (1995), pp. 597-612

[4.]

B.D. Duggan, J.C. Felix, L.T. Mudersfach, J.A. Gebhardt, S. Gros-hen, C.D. Morrow, et al.

Gold-knife conization versus conization by the loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a randomized, prospective study.

Am J Obstet Gynecol, 100 (1999), pp. 276-282

[5.]

A. Ferenczy, D. Choukroun, T. Falcone, F. Franco.

The effect of cervical loop electrosurgical excision on subsequent pregnancy outcome: North American experience.

Am J Obstet Gynecol, 172 (1995), pp. 1246-1250

Medline

[6.]

M.R. Prevost, M.F. Fung, M. Sentermon, W. Faught.

Should endocervical excision and curettage be done during LEEP?.

Eur J Gynaecol Oncol, 18 (1997), pp. 104-107

Medline

[7.]

A. Ferenczy, D. Choukroun, J. Arsenean.

Loop electrosurgical excision procedure for squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix: advantages and potential pitfalls.

Obstet Gy-necol, 87 (1996), pp. 332-337

[8.]

G. Flannelly, H. Langhan, L. Jandial, E. Mann, M. Campbell, H. Kitchener.

A study of treatment failures following large loop excision of the transformation zone for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 104 (1997), pp. 718-722

Medline

[9.]

M.C. Solares, R. Fanjul, A. Maestre, s. Velasco.

Persistencia de infección por virus del papiloma humano tras conización cervical con asa de diatermia.

Prog Obstet Ginecol, 42 (1999), pp. 501-505

[10.]

S.P. Dobbs, T. Asmussen, D. Nunns, J. Hollingworth, LJR Brown, D. Ireland.

Does histological incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia following large loop excision of transformation zone increase recurrence rates? A six year cytological follow up.

Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 107 (2000), pp. 1298-1301

[11.]

G. Hulman, C.J. Pickles, C.A. Gie.

Frequency of cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia followin large loop excision of the transformation zone.

J Clin Pathol, 51 (1998), pp. 375-377

Medline

[12.]

E. Paraskevaidis, E. Lolís, G. Koliopoulos, Y. Alamams, S. Fotian, H. Kitchener.

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia outcomes after large loop excision with Clean Margins.

Obstet Ginecol, 95 (2000), pp. 828-831

[13.]

J.J. Baldauff, M. Dreyfuss, J. Ritter, C. Cuenin, I. Tissier, P. He-yer.

Cytology and colposcopy after loop electrological excision: implications for follow-up.

Obstet Gynecol, 92 (1998), pp. 124-130

Medline

[14.]

M.F. Mitchell, Luna G Tortolero, E. Cook, L. Whittaker, H. Rho-des-Morris, F. Silva.

A randomized clinical trial of cryotherapy Laser vaporization and loop alectrosurgical excision for treatment of squamous intraepithelial lesions if the cervix.

Obstet Gynecol, 42 (1998), pp. 737-744

[15.]

REJ Howells, F.O. O’Mahony, H. Tucker, J. Millinship, P.W. Jones, CWE. Redman.

How can the incidence of negative specimens resulting from large loop excision of the cervical transformation zone (LLETZ) be reduced?An analysis of negative LLETZ specimens and development of a predictive model.

pp. 1075-1082

[16.]

M.K. Dodson, H.T. Sharp.

Uso y abuso de la exéresis con asa electroquirúrgica (LEEP.

Clín Obstet Ginecol, 4 (1999), pp. 833-837

[17.]

A.B. Chin, R.E. Bristow, L.M. Korst, A. Walts, L.D. Lagasse.

The significance of atypical glandular cells on routine cervical cytologic testing in a community-based population.

Am J Obstet Gynecol, 182 (2000), pp. 1278-1282

http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mob.2000.106537 | Medline

[18.]

preinvasoras de cuello uterino. Lesiones.