Información del artículo
Resumen
Se estudia el significado pronóstico de los patrones radiológicos de las lesiones no palpables de la mama. Se analiza de forma retrospectiva un grupo de 263 pacientes clínicamente asintomáticas,diagnosticadas mediante mamografía de lesión radiológicamente sospechosa. Se describen cuatro patrones radiológicos y se relacionan con el resultado de la biopsia.
La incidencia de cáncer en los patrones cálcico,nodular,nodular estrellado y distorsionante fue de 36/132 (27,3%),6/41 (14,6%),33/48 (68,7%) y 4/15 (26,7%),respectivamente. La incidencia en el grupo de mujeres premenopáusicas y posmenopáusicas de estos patrones fue la siguiente:nodular,del 7% frente al 22%; nodular estrellado,del 13% frente al 22%; cálcico,del 66% frente al 41%,y distorsionante,del 7% frente al 5%.
El patrón radiológico de peor pronóstico fue el nodular estrellado,seguido del cálcico. Tanto en las mujeres premenopáusicas como en las posmenopáusicas los patrones más frecuentes fueron el cálcico,seguido del nodular estrellado.
Abstract
We study the prognostic significance of different radiological patterns in non-palpable breast lesions.
We make a retrospective analysis of a group of 263 asymptomatic patients with suspicious radiological non-palpable breast lesions. We consider four radiological patterns, and their relationship with biopsy results.
The incidence of cancer in the microcalcifications, nodular mass, spiculated mass, and distortion patterns were: 36/132 (27.3%), 6/41 (14.6%), 33/48 (68.7%), and 4/15 (26.7%), respectively. The incidence of these patterns in the pre and post menopausal women groups were: nodular mass 7% vs 22%, spiculated mass 13% vs 22%, microcalcifications 66% vs 41%, and distortion 7% vs 5%.
The pattern with the worst prognosis was the spiculated mass followed by microcalcifications. In both pre and post menopausal women the most frequent pattern was microcalcifications followed by spiculated mass.
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
G. Hermann, I. Schwartz, P. Tartter.
Non palpable breast cancer.
[2.]
V. Nirchio, I. Carosi, M. Bisceglia, R. Bellantuono, F. Fiorentino, F. Guiliani, et al.
Radio-surgical-histological procedure in the diagnosis and management of non palpable breast lesions suspected from mammography: experience of «Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza» di San Giovanni Rotondo.
Patho-logica, 90(5 (1998), pp. 437-450
[3.]
G.F. Swartz, S.A. Feig.
Nonpalpable breast lesions: biopsy methods and patients management.
Obst Gynecol Clin North Am, 29 (2002), pp. 137-157
[4.]
American College of Radiology..
Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS.
2,
[5.]
L.W. Basset.
Standartdized reporting for mammography: BI-RADS.
Breast J, 3 (1997), pp. 207-210
[6.]
C.J. D’Orsi.
American College of Radiology mammography lexicon: an initial attempt to standardize terminology.
Am J Radiol, 166 (1996), pp. 779-780
[7.]
P.B. Beaute, M. Thibodeau, G. Newstead.
Improving the yield of biopsy from nonpalpable lesions of the breast.
Surg Gy-necol Obstet, 174 (1992), pp. 93-96
[8.]
P.O. Hasselgren, R.P. Hummel, M.A. Fieler.
Breast biopsy with needle localization: influence of age and mammographic feature on the rate of malignancy in 350 nonpalpable breast lesions.
Surgery, 110 (1991), pp. 623-628
[9.]
T.L. Bauer, S.M. Pandelidis, J.E. Rhoads, R.S. Owens.
Mammo-graphically detected carcinoma of the breast.
Surg Gynecol Obstet, 173 (1991), pp. 482-486
[10.]
B.R. McCreery, G. Frenkle, D.B. Frost.
An anatysis of the results of mammographically guided biopsies of the breast.
Surg Gynecol Obstet, 172 (1991), pp. 223-226
[11.]
J.A. Hall, D.C. Murphy, B.R. Hall, K.A. Hall.
Mammographic abnormalities and the detection of carcinoma of the breast.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 168 (1968), pp. 1677-1680
[12.]
G. Le Bouedec, P. Kuffman, J.M. Pingeon, C. Pomel, J. Dauplat.
Clinically occult invasive breast cancer. A series of 136 cases.
Ann Chir, 48 (1994), pp. 607-612
[13.]
S. Ciatto, M.R. Del Turco, R. Bonardi, L. Cataliotti, V. Distante, G. Cardona, et al.
Non palpable lesions of the breast detected by mammography: review of 1182 consecutive histologically confirmed cases.
Eur J Cancer, 30 (1994), pp. 40-44
[14.]
G. Pastore, M. Constantini, V. Valentín, M. Romani, D. Terribile, P. Belli.
Clinically non palpable breast tumors: global critical review and second look on microcalcifications.
Rays, 27 (2002), pp. 233-239
[15.]
T. Franquet, C. De Miguel, R. Cozcolluela, L. Donoso.
Spiculated lesions of the breast: Mammographic-pathologic correlation.
Radiographics, 13 (1993), pp. 841-852
[16.]
W. Hoeffken, M. Lanyi.
Diagnóstico diferencial de las sombras mamarias en forma de estrella.
pp. 289-299
[17.]
J.G. Azzopardi.
Problems in breast pathology, (1979), pp. 174-184
[18.]
E.R. Fisher, A.S. Palekar, N. Kotwal, N.A. Lipana.
A non-encapsulated sclerosing lesion of the breast.
Am J Clin Pathol, 71 (1979), pp. 240-246
[19.]
R.R. Rickeert, L. Kalisher, RVP. Hutter.
Indurative mastho-paty: a benign sclerosing lesion of the breast with elastosis which may simulated carcinoma.
Cancer, 47 (1981), pp. 561-571
[20.]
S. Ciatto, D. Morrone, S. Catarzi, M.R. Del Turco, S. Bianchi, D. Ambrogetti, et al.
Radical scars of the breast: review of 38 consecutive mammographic diagnoses.
Radiology, 187 (1993), pp. 757-760
[21.]
P.C. Stomper, S. Leibowich, J.E. Meyer.
The prevalence and distribution of well-circumscribed nodules on screening mammography. Analysis of 1500 mammograms.
Breast Dis, 4 (1991), pp. 197-203
[22.]
M. Velasco Romera.
Estudio radiológico del fibroadenoma.
Tesis doctoral,
[23.]
M. Moskowitz.
The predictive value of certain mammographic signs in screenning of breast cancer.
Cancer, 51 (1983), pp. 1007-1011
[24.]
M. Moskowitz.
Circumscribed lesions of the breast.
Syllabus diagnostic categorical course in breast imaging, pp. 31-33
[25.]
D.B. Kopans.
Analizing the mammograph.
pp. 59-114
[26.]
K.K. Linddfors, D.B. Kopans, K.A. McCarthy, et al.
Breast cancer metastasis to intrammamary lymph nodes.
Amer Journal Radiology, 146 (1986), pp. 133-136
[27.]
L.P. Marsteller, E.S. de Paredes.
Well defined masses in the breast.
Radiographics, 9 (1989), pp. 13-37
[28.]
S.A. Feig.
Breast masses: mammographic sonographic evaluation..
Radiol Clin North Am, 30 (1992), pp. 67-92
[29.]
F.M. Hall.
Statistics, opinions and controversies among experts mammographers.
Breast Dis, 6 (1993), pp. 173-175
[30.]
V.P. Jackson.
Circumscribed noncalcified mass with smooth margins.
Breast disease (second series) test and syllabus, pp. 81-87
[31.]
P.C. Stomper, S. Leibowich, J.E. Meyer.
The prevalence and distribution of well-circumscribed nodules on screening mammography. Analysis of 1500 mammograms.
Breast Dis, 4 (1991), pp. 197-203
[32.]
W. Webber, N. Boyd.
A critique of the methodology of studies of benign breast disease end breast cancer risk.
JNCI, 77 (1986), pp. 397-404
[33.]
W.B. Hutchinson, D.B. Thomas, W.B. Hamlin, et al.
Risk of breast cancer in woman with bening disease.
JNCI, 40 (1980), pp. 13-20
[34.]
W.D. Dupont, D.L. Page.
Risk factors for breast cancer in woman with proliferative breast disease.
N Engl J Med, 312 (1985), pp. 146-151
[35.]
Y. Grumbach.
Diagnostic des opacités circonscrites nonpal-pables.
Les lésions infracliniques du sein, pp. 40-60
[36.]
D. Raudant, M. Chomier, S. Laudrivon, R. Ecochard, O. Daville, F. Champion, et al.
Les microcalcificacions mammaires: existe-t-il un consensus sur I’interpretation et la conduite a tenir?.
Cancer, 79 (1992), pp. 451-458
[37.]
R.J. Choucair, B. Holcomb, R. Mathews.
Biopsy of nonpalpa-ble breast cancer.
Am J Surg, 156 (1988), pp. 453-456
[38.]
B. Lafontan, J.P. Daures, B. Salicru, F. Eynius, J. Nihura, P. Rouanet, et al.
Isolated clustered microcalcifications: diagnostic value of mammography. Series of 400 cases with surgical verification.
Radiology, 190 (1994), pp. 479-483
[39.]
M. Le Gal, G. Chavanne, D. Pellier.
Valeur diagnostique de microcalfications groupées découvertes par mammographie à propos de 227 cas avec vérification histologique et sans tumeur du sein palpable.
Bull Cancer, 71 (1984), pp. 57-74
[40.]
D.M. Hansll, I.C. Cooke, C.A. Parsons, et al.
A quantitative analysis of the spatial relationships of grouped microcalcifications demonstrated on xeromammography in benign and malignant breast disease.
Br J Radiol, 61 (1988), pp. 21-25
[41.]
W.A. Murphy.
Isolated clustered microcalcifications in the breast: Radiologic-pathologic correlation.
Radiology, 27 (1978), pp. 335-341
[42.]
R. Millis, R. Davis, A.J. Stacey.
The detection and significance of calcifications in the breast; a radiological and pathological study.
Brit J Radiol, 49 (1976), pp. 12-26
[43.]
Jl Price, N.M. Gibbs.
The relationship between microcalcifications and in situ carcinoma of the breast.
Clin Radiol, 29 (1978), pp. 447-452
[44.]
O.T. Anastassiades, V. Bouruppoulu, G. Kotogeorgos, M. Rach-manides, I. Gogas.
Microcalcifications in benign breast diseases. A histological and histochemical study.
Pathol Res Pract, 178 (1984), pp. 327-342
[45.]
M.J. Homer, H. Safaii, T.J. Smith, D.J. Marchant.
The relationships of mammographic microcalcification to histologic malignancy: radiologic-pathologic correlation.
Am J Roentge-nol, 153 (1989), pp. 1187-1189
[46.]
A. Ahmed.
Calcifications in human breast carcinomas: ultra-estructural observations.
J Pathol, 117 (1975), pp. 247-251
[47.]
D.G. Shepard, D. Cooper, B. Eaton.
Mammography: an aid in treatment of carcinoma of the breast.
Ann Surg, 179 (1974), pp. 749-752
[48.]
R.L. Eganv, M.B. McSweeney, C.W. Sewell.
Intramammary calcifications without an associated mass in benign and malignant diseases.
Radiology, 137 (1980), pp. 1-7
[49.]
H.S. Gallagher, J.E. Martin.
The detection and diagnosis of early occult and minimal breast cancer.
Curr Probl Cancer, 3 (1979), pp. 25-28
[50.]
U.J. Colbassani.
Mammographic and pathologic correlation of microcalcification in disease of the breast.
Surg Gynecol Obstet, 155 (1982), pp. 689-696
[51.]
R.E. Snyder.
Specimen radiography and preoperative localization of non palpable breast cancer.
Cancer, 46 (1980), pp. 950-956
[52.]
J.H. Chekk, A.D. Sears.
Results of breast biopsies for mammographic findigns.
Am J Surg, 136 (1978), pp. 726-729
[53.]
F. Rosesd, M.N. Harris, M.D. Gorstein.
Biopsy of microcalcifi-cations detected by mammography.
Surgery, 87 (1980), pp. 248-252
[54.]
E. Ferrero, A. García Villanueva, J.L. Salvador, R. Rojo, F. Gon-zález Palacios.
Biopsia de las microcalcificaciones en lesiones no palpables de mama para la detección precoz del cáncer.
Senología, 4 (1991), pp. 51-56
[55.]
G.T. Schwartz, D.L. Carter, E.F. Conant, F.H. Gannon, G.C. Finkel, S.A. Feig.
Mammographically detected breast cancer: non palpable is nonsynonym for inconsequential.
Cancer, 73 (1994), pp. 1660-1665
[56.]
de Yoldi G Coopmans, G. Viganotti, S. Bergonzi, C. Ferranti, G. Pirangine, E. Cassano, et al.
Microcalcifications in non-palpable breast carcinoma. Analysis of 427 cases.
Radiol Med (Torino, 85 (1993), pp. 611-614
[57.]
M.E. Berend, D.C. Sullivan, P.J. Kornguth, C.S. Skinner, A. Ost, I.D. Iglehart, et al.
The natural history of mammographic calcifications sujected to internal follow-up.
Arch Surg, 127 (1992), pp. 1309-1313
[58.]
D.B. Kopans.
Specific, non-especific and supporting signs of malignancy.
pp. 115-133
[59.]
L.A. Sickles.
Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably results in 3184 consecutive cases.
Radiology, 179 (1991), pp. 463-468
[60.]
A.S. Lev Toaff, S.A. Feig, V.L. Saitas, G.C. Finkel, G.F. Schwartz.
Stability of malignant breast calcifications.
Radiology, 192 (1994), pp. 153-156
[61.]
E. Sickles.
The role of magnification technique in modern mammography. Reccent results.
Cancer Res, 105 (1987), pp. 19-24
[62.]
E. Azavedo, G. Svane, G. Auer.
Stereotactic fine-needle biopsy in 2594 mammographically detected non palpable lesions.
Lancet, 13 (1989), pp. 1034-1036
[63.]
A. Gómez.
Lesiones ocultas de la mama.
Clin Invest Gin Obst, 20 (1993), pp. 9-19
Copyright © 2004. Elsevier España, S.L.. Todos los derechos reservados
