The prevalence of neoplastic diseases, as well as survival in patients with these diseases, have increased in recent years.1 The rise in life expectancy has been seen to be linked to a rise in the prevalence of morbidity and mortality due to cardiovascular diseases. Furthermore, a clear relationship between cardiovascular health and development of neoplastic diseases has been observed.2
Patients with cancer are also at higher risk of developing cardiovascular disease. This may be linked to concomitant risk factors for developing cancer and cardiovascular disease (CVD) (tobacco use) or due to treatments for different types of cancer (anthracyclines). Specifically, patients with lung cancer have a CVD prevalence of 43%, while patients with kidney or colon cancer have a CVD prevalence exceeding 20%. Patients with haematological neoplasms have a CVD prevalence of 33%, a prevalence of peripheral arterial disease of 20%, a prevalence of coronary disease of 16% and a prevalence of cerebrovascular disease and heart failure of 9%.3
With respect to these neoplasms, the increase in survival in some diseases has been very significant. The 10-year survival prognosis in chronic myeloid leukaemia has improved by 40% since the pre-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) era, and now is similar to that of the general population.4 In addition, patients who undergo haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for various haematological diseases have seen their survival increase by 10% each decade, up to 90% five years after transplantation and 80% 10 years thereafter at present.5 In these cases, CVD has been a leading cause of morbidity and mortality.5,6
There is a clear relationship between the presence of cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs) and the development of CVD, which is also seen in the population with cancer. Furthermore, in these patients in particular, many chemotherapy treatments result in CVD either directly or through the onset of CVRFs.
In the management of CVRFs in patients with cancer, certain characteristics are to be taken into account: pathophysiological mechanisms of CVRFs, clinical frailty and, above all, a high risk of drug-drug interactions, including chemotherapy agents and immunosuppressants.
Below, we report three clinical cases of patients with a history of haematological neoplastic diseases and dyslipidaemia to illustrate the complexity of these patients' follow-up and treatment. In all three cases, laboratory tests with a lipid profile were repeated after three and six months, and treatment outcomes were verified three months after they were started.
Case 1A 35-year-old man had a disease history of chronic myeloid leukaemia diagnosed in January 2017. He was initially treated with dasatinib 100 mg every 24 h, then switched to nilotinib 300 mg in April 2019 due to an incomplete cytogenetic response.
He came in with dyslipidaemia, with total cholesterol (TC) 246 mg/dl, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) 49 mg/dl, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) 185 mg/dl and triglycerides (TGs) 131 mg/dl. In his medical history, he denied signs and symptoms of ischaemic heart disease and peripheral arterial disease, and an electrocardiogram and ankle–brachial pressure index showed normal results. He weighed 80 kg and was 1.81 m tall. In his lipid profile prior to treatment, he had TC 179 mg/dl, HDL-C 46 mg/dl, LDL-C 110 mg/dl and TGs 115 mg/dl.
He was started on treatment with hygiene and dietary measures as well as rosuvastatin 10 mg; his lipid profile improved to TC 175 mg/dl, HDL-C 65 mg/dl, LDL-C 96 mg/dl and TGs 71 mg/dl.
Case 2A 33-year-old woman had a disease history of severe bone marrow aplasia treated with allogeneic HSCT from a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical sibling. She received induction therapy with a CPM-ATG (cyclophosphamide and antithymocyte globulin) protocol. She developed MAGIC II gastric graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) treated with ciclosporin 150 mg daily, beclometasone 6 mg daily and sirolimus 2 mg daily. She also developed iatrogenic hypothyroidism after radioactive iodine therapy for hyperthyroidism, managed with levothyroxine 88 mcg.
She came in on day + 82 of the post-transplant period with hypertension and mixed dyslipidaemia. She weighed 86.5 kg and was 1.78 m tall. Her hypertension was managed with olmesartan 40/hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg 1 pill in the morning. She had a lipid profile with TC 276 mg/dl, HDL-C 35 mg/dl, LDL-C 150 mg/dl and TGs 1,242 mg/dl. She was prescribed a low-fat diet and started on treatment with pitavastatin 4 mg and fenofibrate 160 mg daily, achieving improvement in her lipid profile with TC 247, HDL-C 63, LDL-C 121 and TGs 353. In subsequent follow-up, after her sirolimus dose was lowered, her TG levels dropped to 234 mg/dl.
Case 3A 55-year-old woman with a disease history of treated B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia who underwent allogeneic HSCT. She had previously received first-line treatment with oral fludarabine alone for three cycles and second-line treatment with fludarabine/rituximab for three cycles. She received a conditioning regimen with a protocol with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (FLUCY). She subsequently developed chronic mucosal and fascial GVHD, treated with beclometasone, sirolimus and topical tacrolimus. She also developed grade G3a2 chronic kidney disease due to nephroangiosclerosis and prior use of systemic tacrolimus.
After starting immunosuppressive therapy, the patient developed refractory hypertension and hypercholesterolaemia. The former was treated with a combination of olmesartan 40/amlodipine 10/hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg, with good management of blood pressure levels. As for her dyslipidaemia, the patient did not tolerate treatment with various statins and ezetimibe: she experienced muscle pain and hypertransaminasaemia with atorvastatin 40 mg, rosuvastatin 10 mg and ezetimibe 10 mg, and did not achieve her treatment objectives with pitavastatin 4 mg.
From a cardiovascular point of view, she showed no symptoms during consultation. She weighed 64 kg and was 1.70 m tall. Recent testing showed a lipid profile with TC 276 mg/dl, HDL-C 81 mg/dl, LDL-C 158 mg/dl and TGs 187 mg/dl.
Due to her high cardiovascular risk, a decision was made to start treatment with alirocumab 150 mg with one subcutaneous injection every two weeks. With this treatment and sustained 4-mg doses of pitavastatin, her lipid profile improved to TC 224 mg/dl, HDL-C 87 mg/dl, LDL-C 110 mg/dl and TGs 133 mg/dl.
DiscussionTreating dyslipidaemia in patients with haematological neoplasms can represent a challenge. Many drugs used as chemotherapy agents or immunosuppressants can cause metabolic and cardiovascular toxicity, with patients developing dyslipidaemia and other conditions and facing increased cardiovascular risk (Table 1).
Metabolic and cardiovascular side effects induced by chemotherapy and immunosuppressive therapy.
Drug | Type | Main indications | Therapeutic target/Mechanism of action | Metabolic and cardiovascular effects |
---|---|---|---|---|
TYROSINE KINASE INHIBITORS | ||||
Dasatinib | BCR-ABL TKI | ALL, Ph + CMLOff-label: GIST | Selective BCR-ABL kinase inh. SRC family (SRC; LKC, YES, FYN), c-KIT, EPHA2 and PDGFR-® inh. | Pleuropericardial effusionPulmonary hypertensionMyocardial conduction abnormalities |
Imatinib | BCR-ABL TKI | Ph + CML, Ph + ALL, GIST, severe systemic mastocytosis. | BCR-ABL inh. | Peripheral oedema |
Lenvatinib | VEGF inh. TKI | Unresectable HCC. Advanced kidney ca. MET differentiated thyroid ca. | VEGF multi-targeted TKI: VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2, VEGFR-3, FGF, FGFR-1, FGFR-2, FGFR-3, FGFR-4, PDGFR-〈, KIT and RET. | HypercholesterolaemiaHTNQT interval prolongation. HF. Arterial thromboembolism. |
Nilotinib | BCR-ABL TKI | Ph + CMLOff-label: Ph + ALL, GIST. | Selective BCR-ABL kinase, c-KIT and PDGFR inh. | HypercholesterolaemiaHTNHyperglycaemiaPAD. IHD. Stroke. QT interval prolongation |
Ponatinib | BCR-ABL TKI | ALL, CML | BCR-ABL TKI pan-inhibition (VEGFR, FGFR, PDGFR, EPG, SRC, KIT, RET, TIE2 and FLT3) | HTNHyperglycaemiaPAD. CVA. IHD. Arterial occlusive disease |
Ruxolitinib | IJC TKI | Myelofibrosis. Polycythaemia vera. Acute GVHD. | Selective inhibition of JAK1 and JAK2 | Hypercholesterolaemia, hypertriglyceridaemiaHypertension |
OTHER CHEMOTHERAPY AND IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE AGENTS | ||||
Glucocorticoids | Corticosteroids | – | – | (Dose >10 mg PRED)Hypertriglyceridaemia. HypercholesterolaemiaDiabetesHypertensionFluid retention. Premature atherosclerotic disease |
mTOR KINASE INHIBITORS | ||||
Sirolimus | IS. mTOR kinase inh. | GVHD, heart transplantation, lung transplantation | Inhibits T lymphocyte activation and proliferation in response to antigen stimulation and stimulation with cytokines and inhibits antibody production.Binds to FKBP-12, an intracellular protein, to form an immunosuppressant complex that inhibits the regulatory kinase mTOR (a mechanical target of rapamycin). | Hypertriglyceridaemia. HypercholesterolaemiaHTNDiabetes mellitusDVT. PTE |
Tacrolimus | IS. Calcineurin inh. | Kidney rejection, heart rejection, liver rejection.Off-label: GVHD | Suppresses cellular immunity (inhibits T lymphocyte activation) by binding to an intracellular protein, FKBP-12, and complexes with calcineurin-dependent proteins to inhibit calcineurin phosphatase activity. | HTNHeart failure. Arrhythmia |
Ciclosporin | Calcineurin inhibitor | Tx rejection prophylaxis, RA.Off-label: GVHD, lupus nephritis | Inhibits interleukin II production and release and inhibits interleukin II-induced activation of resting T lymphocytes. | Hypercholesterolaemia. HypertriglyceridaemiaHTNHypoglycaemia. Hyperglycaemia |
RADIATION-RELATED TOXICITY | ||||
Thoracic and mediastinal radiotherapy | Whole-body RT: DM, DL ≥60 Gy: microvascular and macrovascular endothelial damage. Accelerated atherosclerosis. Heart valve disease. Pericardial disease (constrictive/exudative pericarditis).REF heart failure (acute or chronic) |
ABL, ABL proto-oncogene; ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukaemia; Ca, cancer; CML, chronic myeloid leukaemia; CVA, cerebrovascular accident; DL, dyslipidaemia; DM, diabetes mellitus; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; FGF, fibroblast growth factor; FGFR, fibroblast growth factor receptor; FLT3, FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3; GIST, gastrointestinal stromal tumour; GVHD, graft-versus-host disease; Gy, Gray; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; HF, heart failure; HTN, hypertension; IHD, ischaemic heart disease; Inh, inhibitor; IS, immunosuppressant; JAK, janus kinase; KIT, KIT tyrosine kinase protein; MET, metastatic; PAD, peripheral arterial disease; PDGFR, platelet-derived growth factor receptor; PRED, prednisone; PTE, pulmonary thromboembolism; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; REF, reduced ejection fraction; RET, glial cell line-derived neurotrophic receptor factor; RT, radiotherapy; SRC, SRC proto-oncogene non-receptor tyrosine kinase; TIE2, TEK receptor tyrosine kinase; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor; Tx, transplantation; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; VEGFR, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor.
The prognosis for chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) changed radically in 2001 following the introduction of TKIs; imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, bosutinib and ponatinib are the TKIs that are currently available. Dasatinib, nilotinib and ponatinib sometimes cause metabolic and cardiovascular toxicity, while bosutinib and ponatinib are known to cause CVD. Nilotinib specifically has been linked to arterial vascular disease (ischaemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease and peripheral arterial disease) as well as hyperglycaemia and hyperlipidaemia.7 Although the mechanism by which elevation of LDL-C particles occurs is unknown, it was recently found that systemic inflammation due to increased oxidised LDL-C particles could additionally cause a pro-oxidative, pro-inflammatory state that would contribute to CVD risk.8 Another particular characteristic of these patients with dyslipidaemia treated with nilotinib (as seen in Case 1) is that treatment with statins metabolised by cytochrome P450 CYP 3A4 should be avoided, due to the increased risk of toxicity.
Regarding immunosuppressive therapy used in HSCT, sirolimus, a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, is known to cause lipid metabolism abnormalities in 40%–75% of treated subjects, mainly hypertriglyceridaemia, as in Case 2. In some cases, TG levels may be so high that they tend to cause acute pancreatitis. Metabolic abnormalities consist of increased lipolysis, decreased adipogenesis and decreased LDL-C blood clearance. Paradoxically, in animal models, sirolimus has been found to reduce the progression of atherosclerosis, thus improving endothelial function, inhibiting proliferation of smooth muscle cells, decreasing macrophage content in plaque and reducing monocyte recruitment.9
In the third case, the drug involved was ciclosporin, a calcineurin inhibitor, which interferes with LDL-C binding to the LDL receptor, with a decrease in LDL clearance. There may also be other additional mechanisms such as synthesis of ciclosporin-reducing bile acids, which lead to LDL receptor down-regulation and reduce cholesterol elimination. There may be synergistic effects in patients who are also on treatment with corticosteroids. Other calcineurin inhibitors, such as tacrolimus, cause dyslipidaemia by the same mechanism, although the answer to the question of why lipid levels are lower is unknown.10
Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors are drugs that have gained importance in recent years in the treatment of hypercholesterolaemia. Their main uses are in patients in whom metabolic targets are not achieved despite maximum tolerated doses of statins and/or ezetimibe. They have proven to be powerful reducers of LDL-C levels with few adverse effects (16). While their use is widely standardised in patients in secondary prevention therapy and in diseases such as the various forms of familial hypercholesterolaemia, there are no data on their use in HSCT. However, given these drugs' safe mechanism of action, there are no contraindications to their use in this population.
ConclusionsIn patients with cancer, dyslipidaemia should be treated according to the instructions of the different clinical guidelines, with strict monitoring of lipid levels. It should be borne in mind that many drugs used to treat neoplasms and manage rejection in transplant recipients can cause dyslipidaemia. Furthermore, potential drug-drug interactions should be avoided in these subjects, as they are often polymedicated. PCSK9 inhibitors are safe drugs that represent an option in the treatment of dyslipidaemia.
Conflicts of interestThe authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Please cite this article as: Roa-Chamorro R, Torres-Quintero L, González-Bustos P, Puerta-Puerta JM, Jaén-Águila F, Mediavilla-García JD. Dislipemia en pacientes con enfermedades onco-hematológicas. Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr. 2022;69:446–450.