Información del artículo
Las infecciones causadas por grampositivos son en la actualidad un problema terapéutico debido a la aparición y la diseminación de cepas con resistencia múltiple a los antibióticos utilizados como primera elección. Los glucopéptidos, considerados como fármacos alternativos, tienen una eficacia limitada para el tratamiento de las infecciones graves causadas por estos microorganismos, incluidas las bacteriemias y las infecciones endovasculares. Entre los nuevos antimicrobianos aprobados recientemente para su uso terapéutico, la daptomicina ofrece un perfil de eficacia clínica superior a linezolid y tigeciclina para el tratamiento de este tipo de infecciones. Su actividad bactericida y su potencial sinérgico con otros antibióticos, betalactámicos, rifampicina o aminoglucósidos, la sitúan entre los tratamientos de elección para las infecciones causadas por estafilococos y enterococos con resistencia múltiple a los antibióticos. La daptomicina ofrece, además, un excelente perfil de seguridad y una tasa muy reducida de resistencias. Se necesitan nuevos estudios en los que se incluya a numerosos pacientes con bacteriemia e infecciones endovasculares para establecer con precisión la eficacia clínica de estos fármacos. Los nuevos antimicrobianos, actualmente en desarrollo, presentan unas características similares a las de los glucopéptidos, con la excepción del ceftobiprole, y por ello su papel en el tratamiento de las infecciones graves por grampositivos multirresistentes aún está por determinar.
Palabras clave:
Bacteriemia
Endocarditis infecciosa
Tratamiento antimicrobiano
Nuevos antibióticos
Gram-positive infections currently constitute a therapeutic problem, caused by the emergence and spread of strains with multiple resistance to the antibiotics used as the first-line therapeutic option. Glycopeptides, considered as alternative drugs, have limited effectiveness in the treatment of severe infections, including bacteremias or vascular infections. Among the new antimicrobial agents recently licensed for use in humans, daptomycin offers a clinical efficacy profile superior to those of linezolid or tigecycline for the treatment of this type of infection. Because of its bactericidal activity and synergistic action with other antimicrobial agents, such a beta-lactams, rifampicin or aminoglycosides, daptomycin is a potential first-line therapeutic option for infections caused by multiresistant Gram-positive organisms. Moreover, daptomycin has an excellent safety profile, and the frequency of resistance is very low. New clinical trials including a substantial number of patients with bacteremia and vascular infections are needed to establish the potential clinical efficacy of these new antimicrobial agents. Antimicrobial agents currently in development have similar characteristics to those of glycopeptides, with the exception of ceftobiprole. Consequently, their role in the treatment of severe multiresistant Gram-positive infections remains to be determined.
Key words:
Bacteremia
Infective endocarditis
Antimicrobial therapy
New antibiotics
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
G.S. Martin, D.M. Mannino, S. Eaton, M. Moss.
The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000.
N Engl J Med, 348 (2003), pp. 1546-1554
[2.]
A. Esteban, F. Frutos-Vivar, N.D. Ferguson, O. Peñuelas, J.A. Lorente, F. Gordo, et al.
Sepsis incidence and outcome: contrasting the intensive care unit with the hospital ward.
Crit Care Med, 35 (2007), pp. 1284-1289
[3.]
Y. Siegman-Igra, B. Fourer, R. Orni-Wasserlauf, Y. Golan, A. Noy, D. Schwartz, et al.
Reappraisal of community-acquired bacteremia: a proposal of a new classification for the spectrum of acquisition of bacteremia.
Clin Infect Dis, 34 (2002), pp. 1431-1439
[4.]
H. Wisplinghoff, T. Bischoff, S.M. Tallent, H. Seifert, R.P. Wenzel, M.B. Edmond.
Nosocomial bloodstream infections in US hospitals: analysis of 24,179 cases from a prospective nationwide surveillance study.
Clin Infect Dis, 39 (2004), pp. 309-317
[5.]
National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004. Am J Infect Control. 2004;32:470-85.
[6.]
N.D. Friedman, K.S. Kaye, J.E. Stout, S.A. McGarry, S.L. Trivette, J.P. Briggs, et al.
Health care-associated bloodstream infections in adults: a reason to change the accepted definition of community—acquired infections.
Ann Intern Med, 137 (2002), pp. 791-797
[7.]
P. Moreillon, Y.A. Que.
Infective endocarditis.
Lancet, 363 (2004), pp. 139-149
[8.]
E. Mylonakis, S.B. Calderwood.
Infective endocarditis in adults.
N Engl J Med, 345 (2001), pp. 1318-1330
[9.]
V.G. Fowler Jr, J.M. Miro, B. Hoen, C.H. Cabell, E. Abrutyn, E. Rubinstein, et al.
Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis: a consequence of medical progress.
JAMA, 293 (2005), pp. 3012-3021
[10.]
D. Horstkotte, F. Follath, E. Gutschik, M. Lengyel, A. Oto, A. Pavie, et al.
Guidelines on prevention, diagnosis and treatment of infective endocarditis. Executive summary.
Rev Esp Cardiol, 57 (2004), pp. 952-962
[11.]
L.M. Baddour, W.R. Wilson, A.S. Bayer, V.G. Fowler Jr, A.F. Bolger, M.E. Levison, et al.
Infective endocarditis: diagnosis, antimicrobial therapy, and management of complications: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Committee on Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, and the Councils on Clinical Cardiology, Stroke, and Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, American Heart Association: endorsed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.
Circulation, 111 (2005), pp. e394-e434
[12.]
J.M. Cisneros-Herreros, J. Cobo-Reinoso, M. Pujol-Rojo, J. Rodríguez-Baño, M. Salavert- Lletí.
Guía para el diagnóstico y tratamiento del paceinte con bacteriemia. Guías de la Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin, 25 (2007), pp. 111-130
[13.]
L.A. Mermel, B.M. Farr, R.J. Sherertz, I.I. Raad, N. O’Grady, J.S. Harris, et al.
Guidelines for the management of intravascular catheter-related infections.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 22 (2001), pp. 222-242
[14.]
J. Gavaldá, O. Len, J.M. Miró, P. Muñoz, M. Montejo, A. Alarcón, et al.
Brief communication: treatment of Enterococcus faecalis endocarditis with ampicillin plus ceftriaxone.
Ann Intern Med, 146 (2007), pp. 574-579
[15.]
B. Knoll, I.M. Tleyjeh, J.M. Steckelberg, W.R. Wilson, L.M. Baddour.
Infective endocarditis due to penicillin-resistant viridans group streptococci.
Clin Infect Dis, 44 (2007), pp. 1585-1592
[16.]
M.N. Jeffres, W. Isakow, J.A. Doherty, P.S. McKinnon, D.J. Ritchie, S.T. Micek, et al.
Predictors of mortality for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus health-care-associated pneumonia: specific evaluation of vancomycin pharmacokinetic indices.
Chest, 130 (2006), pp. 947-955
[17.]
G. Sakoulas, P.A. Moise-Broder, J. Schentag, A. Forrest, R.C. Moellering Jr, G.M. Eliopoulos.
Relationship of MIC and bactericidal activity to efficacy of vancomycin for treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.
J Clin Microbiol, 42 (2004), pp. 2398-2402
[18.]
J.F. Mohr, B.E. Murray.
Point: vancomycin is not obsolete for the treatment of infection caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Clin Infect Dis, 44 (2007), pp. 1536-1542
[19.]
R.C. Moellering.
Linezolid: the first oxazolidinone antimicrobial.
Ann Intern Med, 138 (2003), pp. 135-142
[20.]
R.N. Jones, J.E. Ross, T.R. Fritsche, H.S. Sader.
Oxazolidinone susceptibility patterns in 2004: report from the Zyvox Annual Appraisal of Potency and Spectrum (ZAAPS) Program assessing isolates from 16 nations.
J Antimicrob Chemother, 57 (2006), pp. 279-287
[21.]
M.C. Birmingham, C.R. Rayner, A.K. Meagher, S.M. Flavin, D.H. Batts, J.J. Schentag.
Linezolid for the treatment of multidrug-resistant, gram-positive infections: experience from a compassionate-use program.
Clin Infect Dis, 36 (2003), pp. 159-168
[22.]
T.E. Dobbs, M. Patel, K.B. Waites, S.A. Moser, A.M. Stamm, C.J. Hoesley.
Nosocomial spread of Enterococcus faecium resistant to vancomycin and linezolid in a tertiary care medical center.
J Clin Microbiol, 44 (2006), pp. 3368-3370
[23.]
Kainer MA, Devasia RA, Jones TF, Simmons BP, Melton K, Chow S, et al. Response to emerging infection leading to outbreak of linezolid-resistant enterococci. Emerg Infect Dis [serial on the Internet] [accedido Jul 2007]. Disponible en: http://www.cdc.gov/EID/content/13/7/1024.htm
[24.]
J.C. Sánchez-Gómez, F. Fraile-Malmierca, E.D. Valverdé-Romero, M. Sánchez, J.A. García-Rodríguez, J.E. García-Sánchez.
Linezolid-resistant Enterococcus faecalis: first report in Spain.
J Chemother, 18 (2006), pp. 440-442
[25.]
A.F. Shorr, M.J. Kunkel, M. Kollef.
Linezolid versus vancomycin for Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: pooled analysis of randomized studies.
J Antimicrob Chemother, 56 (2005), pp. 923-929
[26.]
J.P. Cannon, C.T. Pachucki, C.O. Aneziokoro, J.R. Lentino.
The effectiveness and safety of oral linezolid as primary or secondary treatment of bloodstream infections. A retrospective observational analysis.
Infect Dis Clin Pract, 14 (2006), pp. 221-226
[27.]
C.F. Dailey, C.L. Dileto-Fang, L.V. Buchanan, M.P. Oramas-Shirey, D.H. Batts, C.W. Ford, et al.
Efficacy of linezolid in treatment of experimental endocarditis caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 45 (2001), pp. 2304-2308
[28.]
F.Y. Chiang, M. Climo.
Efficacy of linezolid alone or in combination with vancomycin for treatment of experimental endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 47 (2003), pp. 3002-3004
[29.]
C. Jacqueline, D. Navas, E. Batard, A.F. Miegeville, V. Le Mabecque, M.F. Kergueris, et al.
In vitro and in vivo synergistic activities of linezolid combined with subinhibitory concentrations of imipenem against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 49 (2005), pp. 45-51
[30.]
C. Jacqueline, J. Caillon, O. Grossi, V. Le Mabecque, A.F. Miegeville, D. Bugnon, et al.
In vitro and in vivo assessment of linezolid combined with ertapenem: a highly synergistic combination against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 50 (2006), pp. 2547-2549
[31.]
C. Jacqueline, E. Batard, L. Perez, D. Boutoille, A. Hamel, J. Caillon, et al.
In vivo efficacy of continuous infusion versus intermittent dosing of linezolid compared to vancomycin in a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus rabbit endocarditis model.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 46 (2002), pp. 3706-3711
[32.]
A. Del Rio, J.M. Miró.
¿Podemos mejorar el pronóstico de la endocarditis estafilocócica?.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin, Monogr, 5 (2006), pp. 58-70
[33.]
M.E. Falagas, K.G. Manta, F. Ntziora, K.Z. Vardakas.
Linezolid for the treatment of patients with endocarditis: a systematic review of the published evidence.
J Antimicrob Chemother, 58 (2006), pp. 273-280
[34.]
M.J. Peeters, J.C. Sarria.
Clinical characteristics of linezolid-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections.
Am J Med Sci, 330 (2005), pp. 102-104
[35.]
S. Tsiodras, H.S. Gold, G. Sakoulas, G.M. Eliopoulos, C. Wennersten, L. Venkataraman, et al.
Linezolid resistance in a clinical isolate of Staphylococcus aureus.
Lancet, 358 (2001), pp. 207-208
[36.]
S.J. Sperber, J.F. Levine, P.A. Gross.
Persistent MRSA bacteremia in a patient with low linezolid levels.
Clin Infect Dis, 36 (2003), pp. 675-676
[37.]
E. Bishop, S. Melvani, B.P. Howden, P.G. Charles, M.L. Grayson.
Good clinical outcomes but high rates of adverse reactions during linezolid therapy for serious infections: a proposed protocol for monitoring therapy in complex patients.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 50 (2006), pp. 1599-1602
[38.]
J. Curtin, M. Cormican, G. Fleming, J. Keelehan, E. Colleran.
Linezolid compared with eperezolid, vancomycin, and gentamicin in an in vitro model of antimicrobial lock therapy for Staphylococcus epidermidis central venous catheter-related biofilm infections.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 47 (2003), pp. 3145-3148
[39.]
J.M. Rodríguez-Martínez, S. Ballesta, I. García, M.C. Conejo, A. Pascual.
Actividad y permeabilidad de linezolid y vancomicina en biocapas de Staphylococcus epidermidis.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin, 25 (2007), pp. 425-428
[40.]
E. Senneville, L. Legout, M. Valette, Y. Yazdanpanah, E. Beltrand, M. Caillaux, et al.
Effectiveness and tolerability of prolonged linezolid treatment for chronic osteomyelitis: a retrospective study.
Clin Ther, 28 (2006), pp. 1155-1163
[41.]
M.E. Falagas, I.I. Siempos, P.J. Papagelopoulos, K.Z. Vardakas.
Linezolid for the treatment of adults with bone and joint infections.
Int J Antimicrob Agents, 29 (2007), pp. 233-239
[42.]
A. Soriano, J. Gómez, L. Gómez, J.R. Azanza, R. Pérez, F. Romero, et al.
Efficacy and tolerability of prolonged linezolid therapy in the treatment of orthopedic implant infections.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 26 (2007), pp. 353-356
[43.]
C.F. Carpenter, H.F. Chambers.
Daptomycin: another novel agent for treating infections due to drug-resistant gram-positive pathogens.
Clin Infect Dis, 38 (2004), pp. 994-1000
[44.]
J.N. Steenbergen, J. Alder, G.M. Thorne, F.P. Tally.
Daptomycin: a lipopeptide antibiotic for the treatment of serious Gram-positive infections.
J Antimicrob Chemother, 55 (2005), pp. 283-288
[45.]
P.I. Hair, S.J. Keam, P.I. Hair, S.J. Keam.
Daptomycin : a review of its use in the management of complicated skin and soft-tissue infections and Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia.
Drugs, 67 (2007), pp. 1483-1512
[46.]
R. Cha, M.J. Rybak.
Daptomycin against multiple drug-resistant staphylococcus and enterococcus isolates in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model with simulated endocardial vegetations.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 47 (2003), pp. 539-546
[47.]
G.M. Thorne, J. Alder.
Daptomycin: a novel lipopeptide antibiotic.
Clin Microbiol Newsl, 24 (2002), pp. 33-40
[48.]
J. Alder, T. Li, D. Yu, L. Morton, J. Silverman, X.X. Zhang, et al.
Analysis of daptomycin efficacy and breakpoint standards in a murine model of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium renal infection.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 47 (2003), pp. 3561-3566
[49.]
K. Smith, G. Cobbs, R. Dill, D. Lyon, A. Graves, K. Avent.
Daptomycin versus vancomycin treatment for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in a murine model.
Chemotherapy, 36 (1990), pp. 428-434
[50.]
V.G. Fowler, H.W. Boucher, G.R. Corey, E. Abrutyn, A.W. Karchmer, M.E. Rupp, et al.
Daptomycin versus standard therapy for bacteremia and endocarditis caused by Staphylococcus aureus.
N Engl J Med, 355 (2006), pp. 653-665
[51.]
M.E. Falagas, K.P. Giannopoulou, F. Ntziora, K.Z. Vardakas.
Daptomycin for endocarditis and/or bacteraemia: a systematic review of the experimental and clinical evidence.
J Antimicrob Chemother, 60 (2007), pp. 7-19
[52.]
D.D. Poutsiaka, S. Skiffington, K.B. Miller, S. Hadley, D.R. Snydman.
Daptomycin in the treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bacteremia in neutropenic patients.
J Infect, 54 (2007), pp. 567-571
[53.]
G. Sakoulas, G.M. Eliopoulos, J. Alder, C.T. Eliopoulos.
Efficacy of daptomycin in experimental endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 47 (2003), pp. 1714-1718
[54.]
G.P. Voorn, J. Kuyvenhoven, W.H. Goessens, W.C. Schmal-Bauer, P.H. Broeders, J. Thompson, et al.
Role of tolerance in treatment and prophylaxis of experimental Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis with vancomycin, teicoplanin, and daptomycin.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 38 (1994), pp. 487-493
[55.]
L. Cantoni, M.P. Glauser, J. Bille.
Comparative efficacy of daptomycin, vancomycin, and cloxacillin for the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis in rats and role of test conditions in this determination.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 34 (1990), pp. 2348-2353
[56.]
G.W. Kaatz, S.M. Seo, V.N. Reddy, E.M. Bailey, M.J. Rybak.
Daptomycin compared with teicoplanin and vancomycin for therapy of experimental Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 34 (1990), pp. 2081-2085
[57.]
S. Kennedy, H.F. Chambers.
Daptomycin (LY146032) for prevention and treatment of experimental aortic valve endocarditis in rabbits.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 33 (1989), pp. 1522-1525
[58.]
G.M. Eliopoulos, S. Willey, E. Reiszner, P.G. Spitzer, G. Caputo, R.C. Moellering.
In vitro and in vivo activity of LY 146032, a new cyclic lipopeptide antibiotic.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 30 (1986), pp. 532-535
[59.]
D.R. Snydman, L.A. McDermott, N.V. Jacobus.
Evaluation of in vitro interaction of daptomycin with gentamicin or beta-lactam antibiotics against Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococci by FIC index and timed-kill curves.
J Chemother, 17 (2005), pp. 614-621
[60.]
F. Cilli, S. Aydemir, A. Tunger.
In vitro activity of daptomycin alone and in combination with various antimicrobials against Gram-positive cocci.
J Chemother, 18 (2006), pp. 27-32
[61.]
K.H. Rand, H.J. Houck.
Synergy of daptomycin with oxacillin and other betalactams against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 48 (2004), pp. 2871-2875
[62.]
B.T. Tsuji, M.J. Rybak.
Short-course gentamicin in combination with daptomycin or vancomycin against Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model with simulated endocardial vegetations.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 49 (2005), pp. 2735-2745
[63.]
K.L. LaPlante, M.J. Rybak.
Impact of high-inoculum Staphylococcus aureus on the activities of nafcillin, vancomycin, linezolid, and daptomycin, alone and in combination with gentamicin, in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 48 (2004), pp. 4665-4672
[64.]
M. Torres-Tortosa, F.J. Caballero-Granado, J. Canueto.
Therapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
N Engl J Med, 355 (2006), pp. 2153-2154
[65.]
J. Vouillamoz, P. Moreillon, M. Giddey, J.M. Entenza.
Efficacy of daptomycin in the treatment of experimental endocarditis due to susceptible and multidrug-resistant enterococci.
J Antimicrob Chemother, 58 (2006), pp. 1208-1214
[66.]
F. Caron, M.D. Kitzis, L. Gutmann, A.C. Cremieux, B. Maziere, J.M. Vallois, et al.
Daptomycin or teicoplanin in combination with gentamicin for treatment of experimental endocarditis due to a highly glycopeptide-resistant isolate of Enterococcus faecium.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 36 (1992), pp. 2611-2616
[67.]
M.C. Ramos, M.L. Grayson, G.M. Eliopoulos, A.S. Bayer.
Comparison of daptomycin, vancomycin, and ampicillin-gentamicin for treatment of experimental endocarditis caused by penicillin-resistant enterococci.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 36 (1992), pp. 1864-1869
[68.]
R.G. Hindes, S.H. Willey, G.M. Eliopoulos, L.B. Rice, C.T. Eliopoulos, B.E. Murray, et al.
Treatment of experimental endocarditis caused by a beta-lactamaseproducing strain of Enterococcus faecalis with high-level resistance to gentamicin.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 33 (1989), pp. 1019-1022
[69.]
L.M. Bush, J.A. Boscia, D. Kaye.
Daptomycin (LY146032) treatment of experimental enterococcal endocarditis.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 32 (1988), pp. 877-881
[70.]
K.H. Rand, H. Houck.
Daptomycin synergy with rifampicin and ampicillin against vancomycin-resistant enterococci.
J Antimicrob Chemother, 53 (2004), pp. 530-532
[71.]
K.H. Rand, H.J. Houck, J.A. Silverman.
Daptomycin-reversible rifampicin resistance in vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium.
J Antimicrob Chemother, 59 (2007), pp. 1017-1020
[72.]
C.E. Edmiston, M.P. Goheen, G.R. Seabrook, C.P. Johnson, B.D. Lewis, K.R. Brown, et al.
Impact of selective antimicrobial agents on staphylococcal adherence to biomedical devices.
Am J Surg, 192 (2006), pp. 344-354
[73.]
N. Fernández-Hidalgo, B. Almirante, R. Calleja, I. Ruiz, A.M. Planes, D. Rodríguez, et al.
Antibiotic-lock therapy for long-term intravascular catheter-related bacteraemia: results of an open, non-comparative study.
J Antimicrob Chemother, 57 (2006), pp. 1172-1180
[74.]
J. Fortún, F. Grill, P. Martín-Dávila, J. Blázquez, M. Tato, J. Sánchez-Corral, et al.
Treatment of long-term intravascular catheter-related bacteraemia with antibiotic-lock therapy.
J Antimicrob Chemother, 58 (2006), pp. 816-821
[75.]
K.L. Laplante, L.A. Mermel.
In vitro activity of daptomycin and vancomycin lock solutions on staphylococcal biofilms in a central venous catheter model.
Nephrol Dial Transplant, (2007),
[76.]
P. Vaudaux, P. Francois, C. Bisognano, D. Li, D.P. Lew, J. Schrenzel.
Comparative efficacy of daptomycin and vancomycin in the therapy of experimental foreign body infection due to Staphylococcus aureus.
J Antimicrob Chemother, 52 (2003), pp. 89-95
[77.]
B.A. Cunha, N. Hamid, H. Kessler, S. Parchuri.
Daptomycin cure after cefazolin treatment failure of methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) tricuspid valve acute bacterial endocarditis from a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line.
Heart Lung, 34 (2005), pp. 442-447
[78.]
F. Weis, A. Beiras-Fernández, I. Kaczmarek, R. Sodian, C. Vicol, B. Reichart, et al.
Daptomycin for eradication of a systemic infection with a methicillin-resistant-Staphylococcus aureus in a biventricular assist device recipient.
Ann Thorac Surg, 84 (2007), pp. 269-270
[79.]
H.S. Sader, R.N. Jones.
The activity of daptomycin against wild-type Staphylococcus aureus and strains with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin.
Clin Infect Dis, 43 (2006), pp. 798-799
[80.]
M.K. Hayden, K. Rezai, R.A. Hayes, K. Lolans, J.P. Quinn, R.A. Weinstein.
Development of daptomycin resistance in vivo in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
J Clin Microbiol, 43 (2005), pp. 5285-5287
[81.]
D.J. Skiest.
Treatment failure resulting from resistance of Staphylococcus aureus to daptomycin.
J Clin Microbiol, 44 (2006), pp. 655-656
[82.]
F.M. Marty, W.W. Yeh, C.B. Wennersten, L. Venkataraman, E. Albano, E.P. Alyea, et al.
Emergence of a clinical daptomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolate during treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and osteomyelitis.
J Clin Microbiol, 44 (2006), pp. 595-597
[83.]
A. Mangili, I. Bica, D.R. Snydman, D.H. Hamer.
Daptomycin-resistant, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.
Clin Infect Dis, 40 (2005), pp. 1058-1060
[84.]
P.G. Mariani, H.S. Sader, R.N. Jones.
Development of decreased susceptibility to daptomycin and vancomycin in a Staphylococcus aureus strain during prolonged therapy.
J Antimicrob Chemother, 58 (2006), pp. 481-483
[85.]
L. Cui, E. Tominaga, H.M. Neoh, K. Hiramatsu.
Correlation between reduced daptomycin susceptibility and vancomycin resistance in vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 50 (2006), pp. 1079-1082
[86.]
W.E. Rose, M.J. Rybak, G.W. Kaatz.
Evaluation of daptomycin treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacterial endocarditis: an in vitro and in vivo simulation using historical and current dosing strategies.
J Antimicrob Chemother, 60 (2007), pp. 334-340
[87.]
G.E. Stein, W.A. Craig.
Tigecycline: a critical analysis.
Clin Infect Dis, 43 (2006), pp. 518-524
[88.]
A.K. Meagher, P.G. Ambrose, T.H. Grasela, E.J. Ellis-Grosse.
The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of tigecycline.
Clin Infect Dis, 41 (2005), pp. S333-S340
[89.]
D.L. Paterson.
Clinical experience with recently approved antibiotics.
Curr Opin Pharmacol, 6 (2006), pp. 486-490
[90.]
T.M. Murphy, J.M. Deitz, P.J. Petersen, S.M. Mikels, W.J. Weiss.
Therapeutic efficacy of GAR-936, a novel glycylcycline, in a rat model of experimental endocarditis.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 44 (2000), pp. 3022-3027
[91.]
S.W. Lin, P.L. Carver, D.D. DePestel.
Dalbavancin: a new option for the treatment of gram-positive infections.
Ann Pharmacother, 40 (2006), pp. 449-460
[92.]
I. Raad, R. Darouiche, J. Vázquez, A. Lentnek, R. Hachem, H. Hanna, et al.
Efficacy and safety of weekly dalbavancin therapy for catheter-related bloodstream infection caused by gram-positive pathogens.
Clin Infect Dis, 40 (2005), pp. 374-380
[93.]
A.G. Madrigal, L. Basuino, H.F. Chambers.
Efficacy of telavancin in a rabbit model of aortic valve endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 49 (2005), pp. 3163-3165
[94.]
J.M. Miró, C. García-de-la-Maria, Y. Armero, E. De-Lazzari, D. Soy, A. Moreno, et al.
Efficacy of telavancin in the treatment of experimental endocarditis due to glycopeptide-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, (2007),
[95.]
G.W. Kaatz, S.M. Seo, J.R. Aeschlimann, H.H. Houlihan, R.C. Mercier, M.J. Rybak.
Efficacy of LY333328 against experimental methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 42 (1998), pp. 981-983
[96.]
T. Bogdanovich, L.M. Ednie, S. Shapiro, P.C. Appelbaum.
Antistaphylococcal activity of ceftobiprole, a new broad-spectrum cephalosporin.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 49 (2005), pp. 4210-4219
[97.]
H.F. Chambers.
Evaluation of ceftobiprole in a rabbit model of aortic valve endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant and vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 49 (2005), pp. 884-888
Copyright © 2008. Elsevier España S.L.. Todos los derechos reservados
