metricas
covid
Buscar en
Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica
Toda la web
Inicio Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica Comparative study of bacterial translocation control with nitric oxide donors an...
Información de la revista
Vol. 34. Núm. 8.
Páginas 490-498 (octubre 2016)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Visitas
3533
Vol. 34. Núm. 8.
Páginas 490-498 (octubre 2016)
Original article
Acceso a texto completo
Comparative study of bacterial translocation control with nitric oxide donors and COX2 inhibitor
Estudio comparativo del control de la translocación bacteriana con donadores de óxido nítrico e inhibidor de la COX2
Visitas
3533
María Begoña García-Cenadora,c, María Fernanda Lorenzo-Gómeza,c, María García-Morob, María Inmaculada García-Garcíac,d, María Pilar Sánchez-Condea,c, Francisco Javier García-Criadoa,c, Enrique García-Sánchezc,d, Francisco Lozano-Sáncheza,c, José Elías García-Sánchezc,d,
Autor para correspondencia
joegas@usal.es

Corresponding author.
a Departamento Cirugía, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
b Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
c Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain
d Departamento de Ciencias Biomédicas y del Diagnóstico, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Resumen
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Figuras (7)
Mostrar másMostrar menos
Tablas (1)
Table 1. Bacterial translocation: number of samples with BT.
Abstract
Objective and design

To evaluate the beneficial effects of exogenous NO and an inhibitor of the COX2, and their action levels in a model of SIRS/bacterial translocation (BT) induced by Zymosan A®.

Material and methods

Ninety Wistar rats were submitted to different treatments, and after 12h and 24h they were anaesthetized in order to collect blood, mesenteric lymph nodes, and kidney for subsequent biochemical analyses and microbiological examinations.

Treatments

A nitric oxide donor, Molsidomine®, was compared with a COX2 inhibitor, Celecoxib®.

Methods

Zymosan A® was administered to Wistar rats. The animals were divided into 6 groups: one group for survival study, Group (1) No manipulation (BASAL); Group (2) vehicle of Zymosan A® given intraperitoneally (SHAM); Group I (control), with Zymosan A® (0.6g/kg) intraperitoneally; Group II (Molsidomine), with Molsidomine® (4mg/kg) through the penis dorsal vein, 30min prior to administration of the Zy® (0.6g/kg); Group III (Celecoxib), with Celecoxib® (400mg/kg) orally through a stomach tube, 6h prior to administration of the Zy (0.6g/kg).

Determinations

The parameters survival, bacterial translocation, renal function, neutrophil accumulation, oxygen free radicals (OFR), detoxifying enzymes, and cytokines were measured at different times after Zymosan administration.

Results

The model established induced a mortality rate of 100% and generated BT and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) in all samples. It also significantly increased all variables, with p<.001 for MPO and all pro-inflammatory cytokines, and p<.01 for all OFR. Treatment with Molsidomine reduced mortality to 0%, decreased BT, MPO, pro-inflammatory cytokines and OFR (p<.001) significantly and increased IL-10 and IL-6 production. Moreover, the Celecoxib® showed a lower capacity for SIRS regulation.

Conclusions

The exogenous administration of NO prevented BT and controlled SIRS. Therefore these results suggest that Molsidomine could be used as a therapeutic strategy to protect against BT.

Keywords:
Nitric oxide
Bacterial translocation
Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS)
Multi-organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS)
Resumen
Objetivo y diseño

Evaluar los efectos beneficiosos del ON exógeno y de un inhibidor de la COX2 y sus niveles de acción en un modelo de síndrome de respuesta inflamatoria sistémica (SIRS)/traslocación bacteriana (TB) inducida por Zymosan A®.

Materiales y métodos

Noventa ratas Wistar fueron sometidas a diferentes tratamientos, y después de 12 y 24 horas fueron anestesiadas para recoger sangre, nódulos linfáticos mesentéricos y tejido renal, para analizarlos bioquímica y microbiológicamente.

Tratamientos

Un donador de óxido nítrico, Molsidomina®, fue comparado con Celecoxib®, inhibidor de la COX2.

Métodos

Se administró Zymosan A® a las ratas Wistar. Estas fueron divididas en CINCO grupos: grupo 1 (basal), sin manipulaciones; grupo 2 (sham), vehículo de Zymosan A® administrado intraperitonealmente; grupo I (control), con Zymosan A® (0,6 g/kg) intraperitoneal; grupo II (Molsidomina) con Molsidomina® (4 mg/kg) administrada a través de la vena dorsal del pene, 30 minutos antes de la administración de Zymosan® (0,6 g/kg); y grupo III (Celecoxib) con Celecoxib® (400 mg/kg) administrado oralmente por tubo esomacal, 6 horas antes de la administración de Zymosan A® (0,6 g/kg).

Determinaciones

Se midieron los parámetros supervivencia, traslocación bacteriana, función renal, acumulación de neutrófilos, radicales libres de oxígeno, enzimas detoxificantes y citoquinas, a diferentes tiempos después de la administración de Zymosan®.

Resultados

El modelo establecido inducía una tasa de mortalidad del 100%, y se generaba traslocación bacteriana y síndrome de respuesta inflamatoria sistémica en todas las muestras. También se incrementaban significativamente todas las variables, con p < 0,001 para mieloperoxidasa y todas las citokinas proinflamatorias, y p < 0,01 para todos los radicales libres de oxígeno. El tratamiento con Molsidomina reducía la mortalidad al 0%, disminuía la traslocación bacteriana, mieloperoxidasas, citokinas proinflamatorias y radicales libres de oxígeno (p < 0,001), e incrementaba la producción de IL-10 e IL-6. Además, Celecoxib® mostró una menor capacidad para la regulación del síndrome de respuesta inflamatoria sistémica.

Conclusiones

La administración exógena de óxido nítrico evita la traslocación bacteriana y controla el síndrome de respuesta inflamatoria sistémica. Estos resultados sugieren que Molsidomina podría usarse como estrategia terapéutica frente a la traslocación bacteriana.

Palabras clave:
Óxido nítrico
Translocación bacteriana
Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica (SRIS)
Síndrome de Disfunción Multiorgánica (SDMO)
Texto completo
Introduction

The underlying mechanisms of how and under what circumstances gastrointestinal bacteria translocate across the mucosal barrier have been extensively studied in several animal models.1–12 In fact, although bacterial translocation (BT) can be induced in a variety of animal models, it appears that at least one of three basic pathophysiologic factors must be present for it to occur:

  • 1.

    Disruption of the normal gut flora, resulting in a bacterial overgrowth with Gram-negative enteric bacteria.

  • 2.

    Physical disruption or impairment of the gut mucosal barrier.

  • 3.

    Impaired immune defenses of the host.

As clinical relevance, the same conditions documented to promote loss of gut barrier function and bacterial translocation in experimental models are commonly present in critically ill or injured patients. These patients frequently are immune suppressed. This situation may cause a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS),11,13–15 multiple organ failure (MODS),16–22 and even death.23–28 However, the exact nature of such relationships remains obscure.

In previous studies, it has been shown that SIRS could be crucial in the development of BT, and both SIRS and BT determine the progression to MODS if they are not well controlled.29–32

It is our aim to assess the SIRS and its consequences, due to BT and MODS with high mortality caused by Zymosan A® (Zy)® (protein–carbohydrate complex derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae),30–34 as well as its control with Molsidomine® (nitric oxide donor)35–42 and Celecoxib® (inhibitor of the COX2)43,44 treatments, with the intention of increasing knowledge about the pathophysiology of these processes.

MethodsAnimals, experimental groups, and treatments

All animal procedures were in accordance with the guidelines for animal use published by Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament, and with the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes and Spanish Government (B.O.E. No. 34, 08/02/2013, B.O.E. No. 268, 08/11/2007 and B.O.E. No. 140, 12/06/2013). The Bioethical Committee of the Salamanca University approved all experiments.

All adequate measures were taken to minimize animal pain or discomfort.

Healthy Wistar male rats (Charles River S.L, UK), weighing 250–275g, were fasted overnight but allowed free access to drinking water before surgery. Animals were anesthetized with ketamine hydrochloride (Parke-Davis, Morris Plains, NJ, USA) (75mg/kg)+diazepam (Valium, Roche, Spain) (50mg/kg)+atropine (Atropina, Braun, Spain) (20mg/kg) given intraperitoneally.

We develop an experimental model of MODS induced by inflammatory response and BT. Zy® (Sigma Chemical Co., St Louis, Missouri), according to Mainous et al.45 and other previous studies,30–32 promotes an unspecific and aseptic peritoneal systemic inflammation. We look for a dose of Zy® that causes a mortality between 80 and 90%.37,46–49 The dose of Zy® in this model was established in 600mg/kg diluted in 2mL of mineral oil and given intraperitoneally.

Subsequently, we evaluated the suitable doses of the treatments that should be used. Taking into consideration the previous experience of our group of investigation,30,50 we decide to use the clinical therapeutic doses of the above mentioned drugs: Molsidomine® 4mg/kg51 and Celecoxib® 400mg/kg.

Finally, we had to raise the most appropriate moment for the administration of the treatments. In light of the evolution of the inflammatory response in models of TB induced by Zy,27,52–55 and after assessing the survival of the animals previously studied, it was decided to apply the treatment at the following times:

Molsidomine® (4mg/kg), 30min prior to administration of Zy (600mg/kg) and Celecoxib® (400mg/kg), 6h before administration of Zy (600mg/kg).

Out of a total of ninety rats were randomly divided into 5 groups.

Under anesthesia and aseptic conditions shaved skin, sterile operative fields, and preparation with pavidone-iodine (Betadine®, Asta Médica), a medial laparotomy was carried out.

Group 1 (n=5): Basal. No manipulation. The rats were sacrificed to obtain the various tissues and blood samples.

Group 2 (n=5): Sham. Animals received 2mL of mineral oil (vehicle of Zy) intraperitoneally. After 12h, animals were anesthetized and samples of bacteriology mesenteric lymph nodes, kidney and blood were obtained.

Group I (n=10): Control. Animals received 2mL of mineral oil containing Zy 0.6g/kg, intraperitoneally. After 12 (moment of SIRS, according to previous studies) and 24h (situation of MODS, according to previous studies), animals were anesthetized and samples of bacteriology mesenteric lymph nodes, kidney and blood were obtained.

Group II (n=10): Molsidomine®. Animals received Molsidomine 4mg/kg body weight through the penis dorsal vein. After 30min, animals received 2mL of mineral oil containing Zy 0.6g/kg, intraperitoneally. After 12 and 24h animals were anesthetized and samples of bacteriology mesenteric lymph nodes, kidney and blood were obtained.

Group III (n=10): Celecoxib®. Animals received Celecoxib 400mg/kg body weight orally through a stomach tube. After 6h animals received 2mL of mineral oil containing Zy 0.6g/kg, intraperitoneally. After 12 and 24h animals were anesthetized and samples of bacteriology mesenteric lymph nodes, kidney and blood were obtained.

Animals having a delayed recovery from anesthesia or signs of hemorrhage were excluded from the study.

Variables, sample collection, and analysis

Under general anesthesia and aseptic conditions, the animals underwent a midline laparatomy. Samples of bacteriology mesenteric lymph nodes, kidney and blood were obtained.

Blood samples were collected by aortic puncture in heparinized sterile tubes containing EDTA, aprotinin (1.5mg/mL), and trypsin inhibitor (0.67units/mL). Plasma was separated by centrifugation at 10,000×g for 10min and stored at −80°C until measurements were performed.

Kidneys were removed and a portion of each rat's kidney was frozen in liquid nitrogen and conserved at −80°C. The remaining renal tissue was immediately used for superoxide anion (SOA) and myeloperoxidase activity (MPO) determination.

Microbiology

To evaluate the degree of BT, caecum and small bowel samples were taken from the Basal group. Once the flora had been identified in this group, mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN), blood (obtained by aortic puncture) and kidney samples from the other groups were examined to evaluate BT. All samples were labeled and immediately carried, at room temperature, to the laboratory. Aerobic and anaerobic (Gram-positive and Gram-negative) cultures were performed (Columbia blood agar; agar-chocolate supplied with isovitalex; Enterococcus agar supplemented with 10% biliary salts; salty manitol agar; Mac-Conkey campylosel cefoperazone, vancomycin and Amphotericin agar; HPA culture medium; vancomycin and nalidixic acid Wilkins-Chalgren blood agar; egg yolk agar and Sabouraud chloramphenicol gentamicin agar). Aerobic agar plates were incubated during 24–48h at 37°C, and anaerobic agar plates during 72ho at 37°C in anaerobic jars under the conditions of the GASPAK PLUS® anaerobic system (BBL Microbiology Systems, Becton-Dickinson and Co. Cockeyville, Maryland). Specific identification techniques (qualitative and quantitative) and graft sonication were performed.

Creatinine, creatinine clearance and ionic Na+, K+, Cl concentrations

In order to test renal function, animals were placed in metabolic cages and after 24h urine samples were collected. Blood was obtained from a cut in the tail tip of the heparinized capillaries. Ionic Na+, K+, Cl concentrations were measured in an automatic analyzer Hitachi 747-200 (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianápolis, IN).

Creatinine urinary and plasmatic concentrations were determined using an automatized method based in the Jaffé reaction (Hitachi 717 automatic analyzer, reactives from Boehringer Mannheim, Manheim, Germany). Creatinine clearance was calculated using the conventional formulae.

Measurement of myeloperoxidase activity

Myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity in kidney tissue was used as an index of renal neutrophil and macrophage infiltration. Renal samples obtained were processed, and MPO activity measured as previously described.51,56 Briefly, after tissue homogenization in 50mM Na-phosphate, 0.5% hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (Sigma, St. Louis, USA) and 0146% EDTA (Sigma) pH=6, samples were centrifuged during 30min at 15,000×g at 4°C. Supernatant was then incubated in a buffer containing 0.05% hydrogen peroxide, and MPO activity was measured at 460nm and 25°C. MPO activity (1 unit) was defined as the amount of protein able to degrade 1μmol of hydrogen peroxide/min at 25°C.

Renal tissue superoxide anion

Oxygen free radical (SOA) and detoxifying enzymes superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and glutathione peroxidase (GPX):

These parameters also reflect neutrophil activation through the NAD(P)H oxidase enzyme. Accordingly, together with the myeloperoxidase, the study of oxygen free radicals (OFRs) completed the evaluation of neutrophil activation/migration. Determination of the rate of synthesis of the free radical superoxide anion (SOA) was performed in liver and kidney using the modified Forman–Boveris technique.57 The activity of each defensive enzyme was also determined in liver and kidney using different techniques for SOD,51 CAT58 and GPX.59 Protein concentrations were measured spectrophotometrically by Bradford's method (reagents from Panreac and Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Missouri).

Plasma cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, INF-γ, IL-6 and IL-10)

Plasma levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interferon-γ (IFN-γ), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and interleukin-10 (IL-10) were measured using commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits (ELISA), according to the manufacturer's instructions (R&D systems, Rat cytokines).

Data statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the NCSS computer program.

Results are expressed as means±standard error of the mean (SEM). The exact Fisher test, Mann–Whitney U test, Kruskal–Wallis Z test and ANOVA (Student–Newman–Keuls) were used. Statistical significance was accepted for a value of p<0.05.

ResultsSurvival

In order to examine the protective effect of Molsidomine®and Celecoxib®, a survival study was performed during 7 days. Survival was higher in the group receiving Molsidomine®(100%) than in the Celecoxib®(20%) group. In the Sham group no deaths occurred, being the survival rate at 7 days 100%, whereas 2 days after Zy administration Control group showed 100% mortality.

Microbiologic study

Bacterial distribution in the caecum and small bowel in the Basal group (no injury) pointed to the constant presence of aerobic Gram-negative bacteria (Enterobacteriaceae). Escherichia coli was isolated systematically and some others only occasionally (Proteus mirabilis, Flavobacterium odoratum). Quantitatively, E. coli levels were between 0.01 and 5×105g−1 of feces. Gram-positive aerobic bacteria were also isolated systematically at levels of 0.2–6×106g−1 of feces, with a larger number of species (many species of Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Corynebacterium, etc.). Anaerobic bacteria, mainly Bacteroides ovatus (0.005–1×106g−1 of feces), were also isolated.

The Sham group did not exhibit any bacterial growth/contamination in the samples, showing that the mineral oil (Zymosan vehicle) had not induced BT and that our technique was correct. In the Zy group, a strong degree of affectation was observed, with BT affecting all samples collected from all animals and with statistical significance (p<0.001) with respect to the Sham animals. An increased presence of E. coli was noted in all tissues studied (Table 1). For the prophylactic treatment with Molsidomine® prevented BT, all samples were cultured with negative results, with statistical significance with respect to the Zy animals (p<0.001). For the prophylactic treatment with Celecoxib®, prevented BT, the significant differences with the Zy group animals (p<0.001) were confirmed (Table 1).

Table 1.

Bacterial translocation: number of samples with BT.

  Bacterial translocation in the different groups
  TB/SHAM  TB/Z-12  TB/Z-24  TB/MO-12  TB/MO-24  TB/Ce-12  TB/Ce-24 
Blood
Rat 1  –  –  – 
Rat 2  –  –  – 
Rat 3  –  –  – 
Rat 4  –  –  – 
Rat 5  –  –  –  –  – 
MLN
Rat 1  –  –  – 
Rat 2  –  –  – 
Rat 3  –  –  – 
Rat 4  –  –  – 
Rat 5  –  –  – 
Kidney
Rat 1  –  –  –  – 
Rat 2  –  –  – 
Rat 3  –  –  – 
Rat 4  –  –  – 
Rat 5  –  –  –  –  – 

MLN: mesenteric lymph nodes.

–: none.

+: Tb.

0: exitus.

Renal injury

The study of the renal function demonstrated a serious alteration of it in the groups Zy (especially at 12h), being observed significant differences (p<0.001) among all the groups in the detected values of plasma creatinine, plasma urea and creatinine clearance.

The Celecoxib® group presented a maintenance of the renal function according to the studied parameters. In case of the Molsidomine® group an improvement of the function (p<0.05) was observed with regard to the Zy group (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Survival.

(0,05MB).

In spite of the serious alterations detected in the renal function, the values observed of the ionic (Na+, K+, Cl) study did not present significant differences among the different studied groups (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Study of renal function: (A) plasma creatinine concentrations. (B) Creatinine clearance. (C) Plasma urea concentrations. Values are expressed as mean±SEM. *Zy vs Sham, Mo p<0.001. **Ce vs Sham, Mo p<0.01.

(0,2MB).
Myeloperoxidase (MPO)

As neutrophil and macrophage infiltration is a key step in the tissue inflammation induced by Zy, mieloperoxidase (MPO) activity was measured in renal tissue.

The aggressions in the Zy group promoted a remarkable increase in MPO renal levels (p<0.001) in comparison with the Sham animals, reflecting neutrophil infiltration.

In Molsidomine® group, these levels decreased significantly (p<0.05).

In Celecoxib® group, the levels of this enzyme detected higher than in the Molsidomine® group (p<0.01) (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Ionic concentrations of blood samples: (A) Na+ ion. (B) K+ ion. (C) Cl ion. Values are expressed as mean±SEM. pNS.

(0,19MB).
Superoxide anion (SOA) and defensive enzymes (SOD, CAT, GPX)

Renal levels of superoxide anion (SOA) after Zy administration were markedly higher in the Zy group than in the Sham, Molsidomine and Celecoxib groups (Fig. 4A).

Fig. 4.

Mieloperoidase. Results for MPO in kidney tissue. Note that maximum significance is reached at 24h post-Zymosan. The comparisons of other groups are also significative at each time, respectively. Values are expressed as mean±SEM. * indicates significant at p<.001 vs Sham group, ** indicates significant at p<.001 vs Zy group, and # indicates significant at p<.001 vs Molsidomine group.

(0,07MB).

Renal levels of Defensive Enzymes behaved in the same way, with a significant increase (p<0.01) in the Zy group as compared to the Sham animals being observed.

In the Molsidomine® group, defensive enzymes activity significantly decreased in comparison with the Zy animals (p<0.01). Treatment with Celecoxib® also showed decreases in these variables’ levels, although they were less prominent than those found for the Molsidomine® group (p<0.05) (Fig. 4B–D).

Inflammation markers (TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-10)

Plasma levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α), interferon-γ (IFN-γ), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), were significantly higher in the Zy group than in the Sham group. Treatment with Molsidomine® blocked the elevation of these three cytokines

Celecoxib® group also showed decreases, although they were much less prominent than those found for the Molsidomine® group (Fig. 5A–C).

Fig. 5.

Results for oxygen free radical and detoxifying enzymes: (A) superoxide anion (SOA). (B) Catalase. (C) Glutathione peroxidase. (D) SOD values are expressed as mean±SEM * vs Sham group, ** vs Zy group, # vs Molsidomine group.

(0,28MB).

Plasma levels of IL-6 and IL-10 were significantly higher in the group treated with Molsidomine® than those observed in the Sham, Zy and Celecoxib groups. No significant differences in IL-6 and IL-10 levels were observed between animals with Celecoxib and Zy (Fig. 6A and B).

Fig. 6.

Results for serum pro inflammatory cytokines: (A) TNF-α. (B) IL-1β. (C) IFN-γ. Values are expressed as mean±SEM * vs Sham group, ** vs Zy group, # vs Molsidomine group.

(0,22MB).
Discussion

It is known that BT is able to initiate SIRS, or more probably to enhance it (in a second phase).26,60 Being that translocated bacteria participate in SIRS, they are also likely to contribute to MODS and the consequent death of critically ill patients.27,61 However, the exact role of BT in the pathogenesis of MODS is not completely clarified.62 Many authors have advocated against such a relationship.53 Nevertheless, a clear relationship between BT, SIRS and MODS was observed in our model.

The aim of the present work was to attempt to modulate the systemic inflammatory response and to prevent BT in a situation of aggression. It is clear that SIRS, as an exaggerated and harmful inflammatory response of the organism to an aggression, promotes BT.63 SIRS can be defined as a physiological phenomenon characterized by a sepsis-like condition, present in many clinical and surgical complications, for which no infectious source can be demonstrated.64,65

Our data demonstrate that the administration of Molsidomine® to rats clearly improved animal survival compared with animals that received only Zy. In addition, renal function assessed by plasma (creatinina, urea) and creatinine clearance was better in the Molsidomine® group38–41 than in the Zy group.30 During an acute inflammatory response, a complex cascade of mediators is triggered to recruit neutrophils to the place of tissue injury.66,67 In many tissues a number of stimuli (such as shear stress, LPS, ischemia-reperfusion, immune complexes) may result in neutrophil recruitment/adhesion to endothelium surface, where they start to produce cytokines and oxygen free radicals.42,67 All variables determined increased in all samples, and death occurred in 100% of the animals in the Zy group. The model was based on sequential insults that, as in human clinical situations, lead precisely (due to the exacerbation of SIRS) to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). The effect of exogenous NO administration to that group resulted in a positive SIRS modulation in nearly all the variables studied, values that were not significantly different from those of the Sham group. Celecoxib® group also showed decreases, although they were much less prominent than those found for the Molsidomine® group. The mechanism involved in this protection is probably multifactorial, including a reduction of oxidative stress and the anti-inflammatory properties of Molsidomine®.39,68 The effect of downregulating pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-1-β and IFN-γ can also explain, at least in part, the decrease in OFRs, since these latter were stimulated by cytokine action. Furthermore, the plasma levels of IL-6 and IL-10, are higher in Molsidomine® and Celecoxib® groups than in Zy group. These higher levels of IL-6 and IL-10 could also participate in the protecting effect of Molsidomine® and Celecoxib®. These effects of Molsidomine seem to be mediated by a reduction in the oxygen-radical production, an attenuation of neutrophil and macrophage infiltration, a lower inflammation demonstrated by a decrease of plasma levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines secretion such as TNF-α, IL-1β and IFN-γ, and a higher IL-10 and IL-6 production (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7.

Results for serum anti-inflammatory cytokines: (A) IL-6. (B) IL-10. Values are expressed as mean±SEM * vs Sham group, ** vs Zy group, # vs Molsidomine group, + vs Celecoxib group.

(0,12MB).

In conclusion, our results demonstrate that the experimental model and design developed, was valid for the study aims. Zymosan induces a SIRS that induce BT and MODS with high mortality rate. The use of an exogenous NO donor (Molsidomine) reduces/eliminates translocated bacteria and modulates SIRS.42,67

Celecoxib® also showed control of BT and modulation of SIRS, although was much less prominent than those found for the Molsidomine group.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References
[1]
W. Manzanares, D.K. Heyland.
Pharmaconutrition with arginine decreases bacterial translocation in an animal model of severe trauma. Is a clinical studied justified? …. The time is now!.
Crit Care Med, 40 (2012), pp. 350-352
[2]
M.R. McVay, C. Boneti, C.M. Habib, J.E. Keller, E.R. Kokoska, R.J. Jackson, et al.
Formula fortified with live probiotic culture reduces pulmonary and gastrointestinal bacterial colonization and translocation in a newborn animal model.
J Pediatr Surg, 43 (2008), pp. 25-29
[3]
S. Samel, M. Keese, M. Kleczka, S. Lanig, N. Gretz, M. Hafner, et al.
Microscopy of bacterial translocation during small bowel obstruction and ischemia in vivo – a new animal model.
BMC Surg, 2 (2002), pp. 6
[4]
Y. Su, H. Pan, Z. Guo, W. Zhou, B. Zhang.
Bacterial translocation and endotoxemia after pringle maneuver in cirrhotic rats.
Dig Dis Sci, 60 (2015), pp. 414-419
[5]
C. Joly Condette, H. Khorsi-Cauet, P. Morliere, L. Zabijak, J. Reygner, V. Bach, et al.
Increased gut permeability and bacterial translocation after chronic chlorpyrifos exposure in rats.
[6]
A. Onder, M. Kapan, H. Yuksel, R. Tekin, A. Kele, O. Evliyaoglu, et al.
The effects of erythropoietin on bacterial translocation and inflammation in rats with obstructive jaundice.
Ann Ital Chir, 85 (2014), pp. 159-165
[7]
E. Sanchez, J.C. Nieto, A. Boullosa, S. Vidal, F.J. Sancho, G. Rossi, et al.
VSL#3 probiotic treatment decreases bacterial translocation in rats with carbon tetrachloride-induced cirrhosis.
Liver Int, 35 (2015), pp. 735-745
[8]
T. Eaves-Pyles, H.R. Wong, J.W. Alexander.
Sodium arsenite induces the stress response in the gut and decreases bacterial translocation in a burned mouse model with gut-derived sepsis.
Shock, 13 (2000), pp. 314-319
[9]
P. Anderlik, K. Antmann, Z. Banos.
Interaction of immunosuppressive drugs in mouse experiments with special regards to bacterial translocation.
Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung, 48 (2001), pp. 107-113
[10]
K.A. Kadaoui, B. Corthesy.
Secretory IgA mediates bacterial translocation to dendritic cells in mouse Peyer's patches with restriction to mucosal compartment.
J Immunol, 179 (2007), pp. 7751-7757
[11]
S. Betge, M. Stingl, W. Pfister, H.R. Figulla, C. Jung.
Investigation of bacterial translocation in chronic ischemic heart failure in the rat.
Clin Lab, 61 (2015), pp. 93-100
[12]
O. Topuz, Y.S. Ilhan, O. Dogru, E. Aygen, S. Sozen.
Effect of melatonin and misoprostol on bacterial translocation in portal hypertensive rats.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 27 (2012), pp. 562-565
[13]
C.B. Pearce, V. Zinkevich, I. Beech, V. Funjika, A.G. Ruiz, A. Aladawi, et al.
Using the polymerase chain reaction coupled with denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis to investigate the association between bacterial translocation and systemic inflammatory response syndrome in predicted acute severe pancreatitis.
World J Gastroenterol, 11 (2005), pp. 7142-7147
[14]
L.C. Weaver, F. Bao, G.A. Dekaban, T. Hryciw, S.R. Shultz, D.P. Cain, et al.
CD11d integrin blockade reduces the systemic inflammatory response syndrome after traumatic brain injury in rats.
Exp Neurol, 271 (2015), pp. 409-422
[15]
J. Ismail, J. Sankar.
Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and sepsis – an ever-evolving paradigm.
Indian J Pediatr, 82 (2015), pp. 675-676
[16]
Y. Peng, M. Gao, Y. Jiang, K. Wang, H. Zhang, Z. Xiao, et al.
Angiogenesis inhibitor endostatin protects mice with sepsis from multiple organ dysfunction syndrome.
Shock, (2015),
[17]
S.M. Lin, F.T. Chung, C.H. Kuo, P.C. Chou, T.Y. Wang, P.J. Chang, et al.
Circulating angiopopietin-1 correlates with the clinical course of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and mortality in patients with severe sepsis.
Medicine (Baltimore), 94 (2015), pp. e878
[18]
A. Mao, H. Huang, K. Ding, H. Xin, J. Zhong, J. Hu.
Modulation of endothelial progenitor cells by tumor necrosis factor-alpha in multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in swine.
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue, 27 (2015), pp. 494-497
[19]
G. Ristagno, T. Varpula, S. Masson, M. Greco, B. Bottazzi, V. Milani, et al.
Elevations of inflammatory markers PTX3 and sST2 after resuscitation from cardiac arrest are associated with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and early death.
Clin Chem Lab Med, (2015),
[20]
Xuebijing Injection Iii Clinical Group, J. Gao, S. Liu, Z. Feng, H. Shen, Q. Liu.
[A prospective multicenter clinical study of Xuebijing injection in the treatment of sepsis and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome].
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue, 27 (2015), pp. 465-470
[21]
M. Sanchez-Garcia, A. Prieto, A. Tejedor, A. Martin-Duce, F.J. Fernandez-Sanchez, J. Granell, et al.
Characteristics of thoracic duct lymph in multiple organ dysfunction syndrome.
Arch Surg, 132 (1997), pp. 13-18
[22]
L.C. Lemaire, J.B. van Lanschot, C.P. Stoutenbeek, S.J. van Deventer, J. Dankert, H. Oosting, et al.
Thoracic duct in patients with multiple organ failure: no major route of bacterial translocation.
Ann Surg, 229 (1999), pp. 128-136
[23]
E. Wazna, A. Gorski.
[Bacterial translocation and its clinical significance].
Postepy Hig Med Dosw (Online), 59 (2005), pp. 267-275
[24]
S. Sozen, O. Topuz, A.S. Uzun, S. Cetinkunar, K. Das.
Prevention of bacterial translocation using glutamine and melatonin in small bowel ischemia and reperfusion in rats.
Ann Ital Chir, 83 (2012), pp. 143-148
[25]
J. MacFie, C. O’Boyle, C.J. Mitchell, P.M. Buckley, D. Johnstone, P. Sudworth.
Gut origin of sepsis: a prospective study investigating associations between bacterial translocation, gastric microflora, and septic morbidity.
Gut, 45 (1999), pp. 223-228
[26]
O. Rosero, T. Kovacs, P. Onody, L. Harsanyi, A. Szijarto.
Bacterial translocation: gap in the shield.
Orv Hetil, 155 (2014), pp. 304-312
[27]
S.M. Alaish, A.D. Smith, J. Timmons, J. Greenspon, D. Eyvazzadeh, E. Murphy, et al.
Gut microbiota, tight junction protein expression, intestinal resistance, bacterial translocation and mortality following cholestasis depend on the genetic background of the host.
Gut Microbes, 4 (2013), pp. 292-305
[28]
Z.M. Earley, S. Akhtar, S.J. Green, A. Naqib, O. Khan, A.R. Cannon, et al.
Burn injury alters the intestinal microbiome and increases gut permeability and bacterial translocation.
PLOS ONE, 10 (2015), pp. e0129996
[29]
M. Porras, M.T. Martin, E. Teran, M. Mourelle, P. Vergara.
The nitric oxide donor LA-419 [S-(6-nitro-oxi-hexahydro-furo[3,2-b]furan-3-1-il)thioacetate] prevents intestinal dysmotility, bacterial translocation, and inflammation in a rat model of enteritis.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 324 (2008), pp. 740-748
[30]
F.S. Lozano, M.B. Barros, M.J. Fresnadillo, F.J. Garcia-Criado, A. Gomez-Alonso.
Nitric oxide prevents the bacterial translocation and inhibits the systemic inflammatory response produced by implantation of a vascular prosthesis followed by Zymosan A.
Inflamm Res, 54 (2005), pp. 261-270
[31]
F.S. Lozano, C. Cascajo, E. Garcia-Sanchez, M.B. Barros, F.J. Garcia-Criado, F. Parreno, et al.
Bacterial translocation as a source of dacron-graft contamination in experimental aortic operation: the importance of controlling SIRS.
Surgery, 140 (2006), pp. 83-92
[32]
F.J. Garcia-Criado, F.S. Lozano, M.B. Barros, F.C. Parreno, M.J. Fresnadillo, J.E. Garcia-Sanchez, et al.
P-and E-selectin blockade can control bacterial translocation and modulate systemic inflammatory response.
J Invest Surg, 18 (2005), pp. 167-176
[33]
D. Pietretti, N.I. Vera-Jimenez, D. Hoole, G.F. Wiegertjes.
Oxidative burst and nitric oxide responses in carp macrophages induced by zymosan, MacroGard((R)) and selective dectin-1 agonists suggest recognition by multiple pattern recognition receptors.
Fish Shellfish Immunol, 35 (2013), pp. 847-857
[34]
Y. Gao, R. Jiang, J. Qie, Y. Chen, D. Xu, W. Liu, et al.
Studies on the characteristic and activity of low-molecular fragments from zymosan.
Carbohydr Polym, 90 (2012), pp. 1411-1414
[35]
I.E. Quirino, V.N. Cardoso, R. Santos, W.P. Evangelista, R.M. Arantes, J.A. Fiuza, et al.
The role of l-arginine and inducible nitric oxide synthase in intestinal permeability and bacterial translocation.
J Parenter Enteral Nutr, 37 (2013), pp. 392-400
[36]
P. Zordan, C. Sciorati, L. Campana, L. Cottone, E. Clementi, P.R. Querini, et al.
The nitric oxide-donor molsidomine modulates the innate inflammatory response in a mouse model of muscular dystrophy.
Eur J Pharmacol, 715 (2013), pp. 296-303
[37]
S. Moncada, R.M. Palmer, E.A. Higgs.
Nitric oxide: physiology, pathophysiology, and pharmacology.
Pharmacol Rev, 43 (1991), pp. 109-142
[38]
L.G. Bongartz, B. Braam, M.C. Verhaar, M.J. Cramer, R. Goldschmeding, C.A. Gaillard, et al.
The nitric oxide donor molsidomine rescues cardiac function in rats with chronic kidney disease and cardiac dysfunction.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 299 (2010), pp. H2037-H2045
[39]
V. Chander, K. Chopra.
Renal protective effect of molsidomine and l-arginine in ischemia-reperfusion induced injury in rats.
J Surg Res, 128 (2005), pp. 132-139
[40]
V. Chander, K. Chopra.
Molsidomine, a nitric oxide donor and l-arginine protects against rhabdomyolysis-induced myoglobinuric acute renal failure.
Biochim Biophys Acta, 1723 (2005), pp. 208-214
[41]
V. Chander, K. Chopra.
Effect of molsidomine and l-arginine in cyclosporine nephrotoxicity: role of nitric oxide.
Toxicology, 207 (2005), pp. 463-474
[42]
O.M. Disli, E. Sarihan, M.C. Colak, N. Vardi, A. Polat, J. Yagmur, et al.
Effects of molsidomine against doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity in rats.
Eur Surg Res, 51 (2013), pp. 79-90
[43]
K.H. Li, L. Cheng, Y. Zhu, G.B. Deng, H.T. Long.
Effects of a selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor (celecoxib) on fracture healing in rats.
Indian J Orthop, 47 (2013), pp. 395-401
[44]
Z. Ashkavand, H. Malekinejad, A. Amniattalab, A. Rezaei-Golmisheh, B.S. Vishwanath.
Silymarin potentiates the anti-inflammatory effects of celecoxib on chemically induced osteoarthritis in rats.
Phytomedicine, 19 (2012), pp. 1200-1205
[45]
M.R. Mainous, P. Tso, R.D. Berg, E.A. Deitch.
Studies of the route, magnitude, and time course of bacterial translocation in a model of systemic inflammation.
Arch Surg, 126 (1991), pp. 33-37
[46]
R.M. Clancy, J. Leszczynska-Piziak, S.B. Abramson.
Nitric oxide, an endothelial cell relaxation factor, inhibits neutrophil superoxide anion production via a direct action on the NADPH oxidase.
J Clin Invest, 90 (1992), pp. 1116-1121
[47]
M.S. Finkel, C.V. Oddis, T.D. Jacob, S.C. Watkins, B.G. Hattler, R.L. Simmons.
Negative inotropic effects of cytokines on the heart mediated by nitric oxide.
Science, 257 (1992), pp. 387-389
[48]
K.D. Forsyth, A.C. Simpson, R.J. Levinsky.
CD15 antibodies increase neutrophil adhesion to endothelium by an LFA-1-dependent mechanism.
Eur J Immunol, 19 (1989), pp. 1331-1334
[49]
A.M. Lefer, X.L. Ma.
PMN adherence to cat ischemic-reperfused mesenteric vascular endothelium under flow: role of P-selectin.
J Appl Physiol (1985), 76 (1994), pp. 33-38
[50]
F. Lozano Sanchez, F.J. Garcia Criado, I. Garcia Garcia, B. Munoz de la Espada, E. Garcia Sanchez, V. Martin Vicente, et al.
An experimental model of bacterial translocation.
Nutr Hosp, 8 (1993), pp. 405-410
[51]
F.J. Garcia-Criado, N. Eleno, F. Santos-Benito, J.J. Valdunciel, M. Reverte, F.S. Lozano-Sanchez, et al.
Protective effect of exogenous nitric oxide on the renal function and inflammatory response in a model of ischemia-reperfusion.
Transplantation, 66 (1998), pp. 982-990
[52]
T.V. Cacciarelli, N.B. Sumrani, J.H. Hong, C.K. Chen, B.G. Sommer.
Influence of the timing of FK 506 (Tacrolimus) administration on recovery of renal function from warm ischemic injury in rats.
ASAIO J, 40 (1994), pp. 964-967
[53]
E.A. Deitch.
Bacterial translocation or lymphatic drainage of toxic products from the gut: what is important in human beings.
Surgery, 131 (2002), pp. 241-244
[54]
Y.J. Kim, K.H. Lim, M.Y. Kim, E.J. Jo, S.Y. Lee, S.E. Lee, et al.
Cross-reactivity to acetaminophen and celecoxib according to the type of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug hypersensitivity.
Allergy Asthma Immunol Res, 6 (2014), pp. 156-162
[55]
G. Fradet, A. Robin-Le Nechet, H. Huguenin, A. Chiffoleau.
Hypersensitivity to celecoxib.
Ann Med Interne (Paris), 154 (2003), pp. 181-182
[56]
H.S. Rosenkranz, G. Klopman.
New structural concepts for predicting carcinogenicity in rodents: an artificial intelligence approach.
Teratog Carcinog Mutagen, 10 (1990), pp. 73-88
[57]
H.J. Forman, J.A. Kennedy.
Role of superoxide radical in mitochondrial dehydrogenase reactions.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 60 (1974), pp. 1044-1050
[58]
I. Alican, P. Kubes.
A critical role for nitric oxide in intestinal barrier function and dysfunction.
Am J Physiol, 270 (1996), pp. G225-G237
[59]
R.D. Berg, A.W. Garlington.
Translocation of certain indigenous bacteria from the gastrointestinal tract to the mesenteric lymph nodes and other organs in a gnotobiotic mouse model.
Infect Immun, 23 (1979), pp. 403-411
[60]
E.N. Wardle.
Bacterial translocation in multiple organ failure: cause or epiphenomenon still unproven.
[61]
M.M. de Oca Arjona, M. Marquez, M.J. Soto, C. Rodriguez-Ramos, A. Terron, A. Vergara, et al.
Bacterial translocation in HIV-infected patients with HCV cirrhosis: implication in hemodynamic alterations and mortality.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr, 56 (2011), pp. 420-427
[62]
S.M. Steinberg.
Bacterial translocation: what it is and what it is not.
Am J Surg, 186 (2003), pp. 301-305
[63]
F.S. Lozano, F.J. Garcia-Criado, M.J. Fresnadillo, E. Garcia, J.E. Garcia, A. Gomez-Alonso.
Systemic inflammatory response induced by dacron graft and modulation by antimicrobial agents: experimental study.
J Surg Res, 107 (2002), pp. 7-13
[64]
R.C. Bone, R.A. Balk, F.B. Cerra, R.P. Dellinger, A.M. Fein, W.A. Knaus, et al.
Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine.
Chest, 136 (1992), pp. e28
[65]
R.C. Bone, C.L. Sprung, W.J. Sibbald.
Definitions for sepsis and organ failure.
Crit Care Med, 20 (1992), pp. 724-726
[66]
G.A. Nieuwenhuijzen, Y. Haskel, Q. Lu, R.D. Berg, N. van Rooijen, R.J. Goris, et al.
Macrophage elimination increases bacterial translocation and gut-origin septicemia but attenuates symptoms and mortality rate in a model of systemic inflammation.
Ann Surg, 218 (1993), pp. 791-799
[67]
T. Kilic, H. Parlakpinar, A. Polat, E. Taslidere, N. Vardi, E. Sarihan, et al.
Protective and therapeutic effect of molsidomine on bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis in rats.
Inflammation, 37 (2014), pp. 1167-1178
[68]
Q.Y. Lu, Y.Y. Zhou, J.B. Wang, L. Wang, L. Meng, J.K. Weng, et al.
Preparation of rat model of systemic inflammatory response syndrome induced by zymosan.
Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban, 40 (2011), pp. 641-646
Copyright © 2016. Elsevier España, S.L.U. and Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos