metricas
covid
Buscar en
Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica
Toda la web
Inicio Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica Ingresos, estancia y mortalidad de las neumonías adquiridas en la comunidad en ...
Información de la revista
Vol. 22. Núm. 2.
Páginas 64-69 (febrero 2004)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 22. Núm. 2.
Páginas 64-69 (febrero 2004)
Acceso a texto completo
Ingresos, estancia y mortalidad de las neumonías adquiridas en la comunidad en un hospital de agudos. Correlación entre el índice pronóstico de severidad y los criterios clínicos tradicionales de valoración de la gravedad
Hospital admission, duration of stay and mortality in community-acquired pneumonia in an acute care hospital. Correlation between a pneumonia prognosis index and conventional clinical criteria for assessing severity
Visitas
6892
Esther Calbo1
Autor para correspondencia
32700ecs@comb.es

Correspondencia: Dra. E. Calbo. Servicio de Medicina Interna. Hospital Mútua de Terrassa. Pl. Dr. Robert. 08221 Terrassa. Barcelona. España.
, Anna Ochoa de Echagüen, Mónica Rodríguez-Carballeira, Carles Ferrer, Javier Garau
Servicio de Medicina Interna. Hospital Mútua de Terrassa. Terrassa. Barcelona. España
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Resumen
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Introducción

Nuestro objetivo fue evaluar el tratamiento de la neumonía adquirida en la comunidad (NAC) según los criterios convencionales comúnmente aplicados, comparándolos con el índice pronóstico de severidad (IPS) y analizar los factores relacionados con la necesidad de ingreso en la categoría III del IPS

Métodos

Se incluyeron prospectivamente los pacientes adultos con NAC atendidos durante 1999. A su llegada se recopilaron los datos necesarios para el cálculo del IPS; al alta, los días de estancia, la ubicación y la mortalidad

Resultados

Se recogieron 447 casos de NAC. El 55,7% pertenecía a las categorías IV o V. Se produjeron 27 muertos (6,1%), el 97% en categorías IV y V. Hubo 362 ingresos, 302 (83%) pertenecían a las categorías III, IV y V. Se trataron de forma ambulatoria 85 pacientes (el 60% eran de categoría I o II). Se ha observado un aumento en la tasa de reingresos de forma proporcional a la categoría de riesgo que oscila del 4% en la categoría I al 18% en la categoría IV. En la categoría III (con 80 enfermos) se produjeron 63 ingresos (79%), con una estancia media de 7,89 días. En esta categoría, la presencia de alteraciones en la exploración física o analítica fue un factor asociado al ingreso (OR, 7,62 [1,5-35,2])

Conclusión

El IPS se ha mostrado útil en nuestra cohorte en la estratificación de enfermos por gravedad y como factor asociado a la necesidad de ingreso y de reingreso. En categoría III, la variable mejor relacionada con la hospitalización fue la gravedad de la NAC y no la presencia de comorbilidad

Palabras clave:
Neumonía
Gravedad
Hospitalización
Introduction

The objective of this study was to evaluate the management of community acquired pneumonia (CAP) according to conventional clinical criteria applied in the emergency room as compared to a pneumonia prognosis index (PPI) (Fine et al. NEJM 1997). We also analyzed which factors were associated with the need for inpatient treatment in PPI risk category III patients

Methods

We prospectively enrolled all adults with CAP seen in the emergency room during 1999. The data required to calculate the PPI were collected at admission. Mortality and length of stay were recorded at discharge

Results

A total of 447 patients with CAP were collected, 55.7% in the high-risk classes IV and V. Twenty-seven patients died (6.1%) and 97% of these were within the high-risk classes. There were 362 hospitalizations; 302 (83%) were classes III, IV and V. The readmission rate increased with increases in the risk class, with a range of 4% for class I to 18% for class IV. Eighty-five patients (19%) were treated on an outpatient basis

Risk class III included 80 patients; 63 (79%) were hospitalized, with a length of stay of 7.89 days. The factor most highly associated with hospitalization in this group was abnormal findings on physical examination or on laboratory testing and radiographic studies. (OR: 7.62 [1.5-35.2])

Conclusions

In our cohort, the PPI was effective for identifying low-risk patients with CAP who could be treated as outpatients. In risk class III patients, the severity of the disease was the strongest predictor of hospitalization, rather than the presence of comorbid conditions

Key words:
Pneumonia
Severity
Hospitalization
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
R.A. Garibaldi.
Epidemiology of community-acquired respiratory tract infections in adults: Incidence, etiology and impact.
Am J Med, 78 (1985), pp. 32-37
[2.]
1997 Medicare and Medicaid statistical supplement.
Health Care Financ Rev, 18 (1997), pp. 73
[3.]
V. Monge, A. González.
Hospital admissions for pneumonia in Spain.
Infection, 29 (2001), pp. 3-6
[4.]
D. Aronsky, N.C. Dean.
How should we make the admission decision in community-acquired pneumonia?.
Med Clin North Am, 85 (2001), pp. 1397-1411
[5.]
J.R. Lave, C.J. Lin, M.J. Fine, P. Hugues-Cromwick.
The cost of treating patients with community-acquired pneumonia.
Semin Resp Crit Care Med, 20 (1999), pp. 189-197
[6.]
M.S. Niederman, J.S. McCombs, A.N. Unger, A. Kumar, R. Popovian.
The cost of treating community-acquired pneumonia.
Clin Ther, 20 (1998), pp. 820-837
[7.]
M.J. Fine, L.J. Hough, A.R. Medsger, Y.H. Li, E.M. Ricci, D.E. Singer.
The hospital admission decision for patients with community-acquired pneumonia.
Arch Intern Med, 157 (1997), pp. 36-44
[8.]
M.J. Fine, A.R. Medsger, R.A. Stone, T.J. Marrie, C.M. Coley, D.E. Singer.
The hospital discharge decision for patients with community-acquired pneumonia.
Arch Intern Med, 157 (1997), pp. 47-56
[9.]
M.J. Fine, R.A. Stone, D.E. Singer, C.M. Coley, T.J. Marrie, J.R. Lave.
Processes and outcomes of care for patients with community-acquired pneumonia.
Arch Intern Med, 159 (1999), pp. 970-980
[10.]
D.C. Rhew, S. Weingarten.
Achiving a safe and early discharge for patients with community-acquired pneumonia.
Med Clin North Am, 85 (2001), pp. 1427-1440
[11.]
M.J. Fine, T.E. Auble, D.M. Yealy, B.H. Hanusa, L.A. Weissfeld, D.E. Singer.
A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia.
N Engl J Med, 336 (1997), pp. 243-250
[12.]
M.S. Niederman, J.r. Bass JB, G.D. Campbell, A.M. Fein, R.F. Grossman, L.A. Mandell.
Guidelines for the initial management of adults with community-acquired pneumonia: Diagnosis, assessment of severity, and initial antimicrobial therapy. American Thoracic Society. Medical Section fo the American Lung Association.
Am Rev Respir Dis, 148 (1993), pp. 1418-1426
[13.]
S. Ewig, T. Klinfeld, T. Bauer, K. Seifert, H. Schafer, N. Goke.
Comparative validation of prognostic rules for community-acquired pneumonia in an elderly population.
Eur Respir J, 14 (1999), pp. 370-375
[14.]
H. Conte, Y. Chen, W. Mehal, J.D. Scinto, V.J. Quagliarello.
A Prognostic rule for elderly patients admitted with community-acquired pneumonia.
Am J Med, 106 (1999), pp. 20-28
[15.]
S. Ewig, M. Ruiz, J. Mensa, M.A. Marcos, J.A. Martínez, F. Arancibia.
Severe community-acquired pneumonia.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 158 (1998), pp. 1102-1108
[16.]
N. Dean, M. Suchyta, K. Bateman, D. Aronsky, C.J. Hadlock.
Implementation of admission decision support for community-acquired pneumonia.
Chest, 117 (2000), pp. 1368-1377
[17.]
O. Leroy, P. Devos, B. Guery, H. Georges, C. Vandenbussche, C. Coffinier.
Simplified prediction rule for prognosis of patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia in ICUs.
Chest, 116 (1999), pp. 157-165
[18.]
G.D. Campbell.
Comentary on the 1993 ATS Guidelines.
Chest, 115 (1999), pp. 145
[19.]
R. Menéndez, D. Ferrando, J.M. Vallés, E. Martínez, M.l. erpiñá.
Initial risk class and length of hospital stay in community-acquired pneumonia.
Eur Respir J, 18 (2001), pp. 151-156
[20.]
R. Saitz, W.A. Ghali, A. Moskowitz.
Characteristics of patients with pneumonia who are discharged from hospitals against medical advice.
Am J Med, 107 (1999), pp. 507-509
[21.]
T.J. Marrie, C.Y. Lau, S.L. Wheeler, C.J. Wong, M.K. Vandervoort, B.G. Feagan.
A controlled trial of critical pathway for treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.
JAMA, 283 (2000), pp. 749-755
[22.]
S.J. Atlas, T.I. Benzer, L.H. Borowsky, H. Leila, Y.C. Chang, D.C. Burnham.
Safely increasing the proportion of patients with community-acquired pneumonia treated as outpatients: An interventional trial.
Arch Intern Med, 158 (1998), pp. 1350-1356
[23.]
E.A. Halm, A.S. Teirstein.
Management of community-acquired pneumonia.
N Engl J Med, 347 (2002), pp. 2039-2045
[24.]
B. Rosón, J. Carratalà, J. Dorca, A. Casanova, F. Manresa, F. Gudiol.
Etiology, reasons for hospitalization, risk classes, and outcomes of community-acquired pneumonia in patients hospitalized on the basis of conventional admission criteria.
Clin Infect Dis, 33 (2001), pp. 158-165
Copyright © 2004. Elsevier España, S.L.. Todos los derechos reservados
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos