metricas
covid
Buscar en
Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica (English Edition)
Toda la web
Inicio Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica (English Edition) Species and biotypes of Streptococcus bovis causing infective endocarditis
Información de la revista
Vol. 41. Núm. 4.
Páginas 215-220 (abril 2023)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Visitas
253
Vol. 41. Núm. 4.
Páginas 215-220 (abril 2023)
Original article
Acceso a texto completo
Species and biotypes of Streptococcus bovis causing infective endocarditis
Especies y biotipos de Streptococcus bovis causantes de endocarditis infecciosa
Visitas
253
Juan Corredoiraa, Inma Graub, Jose Francisco Garcia-Rodriguezc, Eva Romaya,
Autor para correspondencia
eva.maria.romay.lema@sergas.es

Corresponding author.
, Guillermo Cuervob, Damaris Berbeld, Blanca Ayusoa, Mª José García-Paisa, Román Rabuñala, Fernando García-Garrotee, Mª Pilar Alonsoe, Román Pallarésb
a Infectious Disease Unit, Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti, Lugo, Spain
b Infectious Disease Unit, Hospital Bellvitge, Ciberes, Idibell, University of Barcelona, L’Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain
c Infectious Disease Unit, Hospital Ferrol “Arquitecto Macide”, Ferrol, Spain
d Microbiology Department, Hospital Bellvitge, Ciberes, Idibell, University of Barcelona, L’Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain
e Microbiology Department, Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti, Lugo, Spain
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Resumen
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Abstract
Introduction

Streptococcus bovis/equinus complex (SBEC) is a major cause of infective endocarditis (IE), although its incidence varies greatly depending on the geographical area. The characteristics of IE caused by Streptococcus gallolyticus susp. gallolyticus are well known; there are hardly any descriptions of IE caused by other species or biotypes.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study, from 1990 to 2019, of all SBEC IE in adults in three Spanish hospitals, Lugo (LH), Barcelona (BH) and Ferrol (FH) where the population is mainly rural, urban and mixed, respectively. The incidence of IE was analyzed in 3 areas. Clinical characteristics of IE (277 cases, 258 biotyped) were compared according to SBEC species and biotypes.

Results

There are significant differences between the incidence of SBEC IE in HL (27.9/106) vs. HF and HB (8.8 and 7,1, respectively, p<0.001). We found significant differences (SbI vs. SbII) in mean age (68.5 vs. 73 years; p<0.01), duration of symptoms before diagnosis (46.9±46.5 vs. 30.4±40.9 days; p<0.01), presence of comorbidities: 39.1% (78) vs. 54.2% (32; p<0.04), predisposing heart illness:62.3% (124) vs. 81.3% (48; p<0.006), particularly, prosthetic or intravascular devices IE: 24.6% (49) vs. 52.4% (31; p<0.001), bi-valve involvement:23.6% (47) vs. 11.8% (7; p<0.05) and heart failure: 24.6% (49) vs. 38.9% (23; p<0.03). There were no significant differences in embolic events, need for surgery or mortality. The association with CRC was high in both groups: 77.7% vs. 66.6%.

Conclusions

IE due to SBEC has geographical variations in incidence and different clinical characteristics among biotypes. The association with CRC was high.

Keywords:
Streptococcus bovis
Infective endocarditis
Biotypes
Species
Colorectal cancer
Resumen
Introducción

El complejo Streptococcus bovis/equinus (SBEC) es una de las principales causas de endocarditis infecciosa (EI), aunque su incidencia es muy variable según la zona geográfica. Las características de EI causada por Streptococcus gallolyticus subsp. gallolyticus son bien conocidas; apenas hay descripciones de EI causada por otras especies o biotipos.

Métodos

Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo, desde 1990 hasta 2019, de todas las EI por SBEC en adultos en 3 hospitales españoles, Lugo (LH), Barcelona (BH) y Ferrol (FH) donde la población es mayoritariamente rural, urbana y mixta, respectivamente. Se analizó la incidencia de EI en 3 áreas. Se compararon las características clínicas de EI (277 casos, 258 biotipados) según las especies y biotipos de SBEC.

Resultados

Existen diferencias significativas entre la incidencia de EI por SBEC en HL (27,9/106) vs. HF y HB (8,8 y 7,1, respectivamente, p<0,001). Encontramos diferencias significativas (SbI vs. SbII) en edad media (68,5 vs. 73 años; p<0,01), duración de los síntomas antes del diagnóstico (46,9±46,5 vs. 30,4±40,9 días; p<0,01); comorbilidades: 39,1 (78) vs. 54,2% (32; p<0,04); enfermedad cardíaca predisponente: 62,3 (124) vs. 81,3% (48; p<0,006), en particular, EI protésica o sobre dispositivos intravasculares: 24,6 (49) vs. 52,4% (31; p<0,001); afectación bivalva: 23,6 (47) vs. 11,8% (7; p<0,05) e insuficiencia cardiaca: 24,6 (49) vs. 38,9% (23; p<0,03). No hubo diferencias significativas en cuanto a eventos embólicos, necesidad de cirugía o mortalidad. La asociación con el CCR fue alta en ambos grupos: 77,7 vs. 66,6%.

Conclusiones

La EI por SBEC tiene variaciones geográficas en la incidencia y diferentes características clínicas entre los biotipos. La asociación con el CCR fue elevada.

Palabras clave:
Streptococcus bovis
Endocarditis infecciosa
Biotipos
Especies
Cáncer colorrectal
Texto completo
Introduction

Streptococcus bovis/equinus complex (SBEC) is a group of bacteria involving 7 species which colonize the gastrointestinal tract of animals, mainly birds and ruminants, and they can be transmitted to humans.1 The species causing human infections are: S. gallolyticus subsp. gallolyticus (former S. bovis biotype I), S. infantarius (former S. bovis biotype II/1, with two subspecies: S. infantarius subsp. coli (or S. lutetiensis) and S. infantarius subsp. infantarius) and S. gallolyticus subsp. pasteurianus (former S. bovis biotype II/2). The other 3 species: S. equinus, S. alactolyticus and S. gallolyticus subsp. macedonicus have rarely been implicated in human infections.1,2

SBEC causes different types of infection being bacteremia the most prevalent.3–13 A variable proportion of bacteremic cases have been associated with infectious endocarditis (IE) and colorectal cancer (CRC), depending mainly on the prevalence of S. gallolyticus subsp. gallolyticus (SGG), which is the species with strongest association to both entities.3,12–14

SBEC is the fifth leading cause of IE in the world,15 although its frequency varies among countries and geographic areas.12,17 Its prevalence is higher in Europe than in the USA, being a very frequent cause of IE in some areas of southern Europe.17

The clinical profile has been reported,16–19 but the lack of identification of species or biotypes of SBEC causing IE is of concern. For this reason, the information available is basically referred to biotype I,16,18,19 with only anecdotal case on IE caused by S. gallolyticus subsp. pasteurianus (SGP) or S. infantarius (SI).20,21

The objectives of our study were: (1) to analyze a series of patients with S. bovis IE, the incidence over time and their clinical/epidemiological characteristics in 3 different geographic areas, and (2) to carry out a comparative study between IE caused by SGG (former S. bovis biotype I) and the other species of SBEC, most of which were formerly included in S. bovis biotype II.

Methods

This is a retrospective observational IE study pulled out from a prospective protocol of all patients with bacteremia in adult patients who were admitted to three hospitals in Spain from 1/1990 to 12/2019. Hospital Universitario de Lugo (HL) and Hospital Universitario de Ferrol (HF), both located in Galicia county in the northwest of Spain, and Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge (HB) located in Barcelona, Catalonian county in the northeast of Spain. The Hospital Lugo (HL) is a teaching hospital with 690-beds serving an area of approximately 230,000 inhabitants, which is mainly a cattle production area. The Hospital Ferrol (HF) is a teaching hospital with 350-beds serving an area of approximately 200.000 inhabitants, which is mostly a fishing area; both institutions have no cardiac surgery or organ transplantation programs. The Hospital Bellvitge (HB) is a 900-bed university hospital, which serves an overall population of about one million people in an urban area, and it has an active program of organ transplantation and cardiac surgery. All three institutions have a prospective surveillance protocol of all patients with bacteremia since 1990s. In a previous study we described all cases of bacteremia caused by SBEC in our institutions.13

Study design

From 1990, in our institutions (HL, HF and HB) we have prospectively studied all patients with bacteremia. In a daily basis the Microbiology laboratory identify those cases with positive blood cultures and an Infectious Disease physician visited the patients. The microbiology and clinical data were included in a computerized database in each institution using the same protocol. From these databases we selected the cases with SBEC EI. In patients who had more than one episode of IE only the first episode was included in the present study.

Definitions and outcome

Definitive and probable IE were diagnosed applying modified Duke's criteria, and retrospectively before the year 2000.22 Transthoracic echocardiography was used in all patients with IE and transesophageal ultrasound was also used where the previous test was not conclusive.

Intravascular devices were defined as a permanent pacemaker and/or cardioverter-defibrillator.

Embolic events were defined as emboli in various parts of the body, such as the brain, lung, coronary artery, spleen, intestine, kidney, and large artery of the extremities. Symptomatic and asymptomatic cases were included, but we have not systematically performed imaging tests in the asymptomatic patient to detect emboli.

We tried to submit to colonoscopy to most patients with SBEC IE. The colon was examined up to the cecum by colonoscopic evaluation during the episode of IE in most cases, but in some others, colon examination had been performed earlier when the diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) was made. All visible polyps were removed and sent to the Pathology Department for histological examination. CRC included both adenoma and carcinoma; advanced adenoma was defined as an adenoma with a diameter of ≥1cm, or tubulovillous (25–75% of villous component) or villous (>75%) histology, or high-grade dysplasia. Carcinoma in situ was classified as adenoma with high-grade dysplasia, and the criterion for invasive cancer was the presence of malignant cells beyond the muscularis mucosa.

Microbiological studies

Blood cultures were performed according to standard criteria applied to all participating Microbiology laboratories of the three hospitals. Species identification was performed by the API 20 Strep system (BioMérieux, Marcy-l’Etoile, France), and with Vitek 2 system using the gram-positive (GP) identification card (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France). In recent years, Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization -time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) has been implemented as a first step for diagnosis. Additional confirmatory tests were performed by conventional methods.23 Analysis of the complete rRNA gene sequence6 and the polymorphism of manganese-dependent superoxide dismutase gene (sodA) according to the indications of Poyart24 were used for molecular identification. The sequences obtained were compared with those of the corresponding genes available in GenBank by using Blast sequence software (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out with the PASW-20. Categorical variables were expressed as proportions with binomial 95% confidence intervals and compared using two-sided Chi-square test or Fisher exact tests. Continuous variables were analyzed with Student's t test when normally distributed; otherwise, they were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U test. To determine the increase in the incidence, we considered two periods: 1990–2004 and 2005–2019. Variations in incidence rates among the three areas were determined by comparing incidence rate ratios with 95% confidence intervals using Poisson regression. The alpha level was set at .05 for all statistical tests. Denominators for the incidence rates calculation were extracted from the official census.25

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest - Ethical approval: All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

ResultsEpidemiological aspects

During the study period, we detected 277 cases of IE caused by SBEC. They accounted for 14.1% of the total IE (277/1952); this proportion ranged between 26.2% (134/511) in HL (1st cause of IE), 13.1% (41/312) in HF (3rd cause of IE) and 9.0% of all IE (102/1129) in HB (5th cause of IE). In addition, the incidence (1990–2004 vs. 2005–2019) ranged between 16.5 and 27.9 per million inhabitants/year in Lugo (HL); 6.1 and 8.8 in Ferrol (HF), and 4.0 and 7.1, respectively, in Barcelona (HB) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Incidence of Streptococcus bovis EI in three geographic areas in Spain.

  Area 1: Lugo  Area 2: Ferrol  Area 3: Barcelona 
Periods  No. of cases (cases/106 person-years)
1990–2004*  16.5  6.1 
2004–2019**  27.9  8.8  7.1 
*

p value Area 1 vs 2: p=0.05; Area 1 vs 3 p=0.03.

**

p value Area 1 vs 2: p=0.003; Area 1 vs 3 p<0.001.

The incidence rate ratio was higher in Lugo in the 1990–2004 period than in Ferrol (RR 2.67; 95%CI: 1.04–6.81, p=0.05) and in Barcelona (RR 4; 95%CI: 1.29–16.44, p=0.01), it was also higher in the 2005–2019 period: vs. Ferrol (RR 3.11; 95%CI: 1.47–6.59, p=0.003), and vs. (Barcelona RR 4; 95%CI: 1.75–9.16, p<0.001). Comparing 2005–2019 and 1990–2004 periods, the incidence of endocarditis increased in all three geographical areas, mostly in Lugo without being a significant increase (RR 1.75; 95%CI: 0.95–3.23, p=0.09).

Etiology

In 258 of the 277 (93.1%) IE cases the species or biotypes of SBEC could be determined. 199 IE caused by SbI (SGG) and 59 caused by SbII (S. gallolyticus subsp. pasteurianus 33, S. infantarius 17, S. equinus 2 and biotype II 7) were identified.

Although in the 3 medical centers SGG was the predominant species among IE caused by SBEC, there were important differences in their proportions. Thus in the HL and HF the SGG/SGP ratio was 11 times (HL: 117/10; HF: 34/3), in the HB this ratio was 2.4 times (48/20). This is because while in the two Galician hospitals (HL and HF) SGG was the predominant species in bacteremia cases, in the HB, SGP was the main species.

During the same period, 292 bacteremia cases of SbI and 429 of SbII were detected. The association with IE was greater for SbI: 68.1% (199/292) than for SbII: 13.7% (59/429; p<0.001). On the other hand, we analyzed the association of species and subspecies of SBEG with IE. According to other reports, in our series the association of SGG with IE was greater than that occurred with SGP and SI; this association was similar for SGP and SI: 18.1% vs. 14.0%, respectively (Table 3). However there was a great difference between the two subspecies of SI: S. lutetiensis and S. infantarius subsp. infantarius, while for the first subspecies only 7 of 96 bacteremia cases were associated with IES (7.2%), for the second this association was 60% (6/10).

Clinical characteristics

We compared the demographic and epidemiological/clinical characteristics between biotype I (199 cases) and biotype II (59 cases). There was a predominance of elderly men in both groups, but patients with Sb II IE were older, had more comorbidities, predisposing heart illness, particularly, prosthetic valves or intravascular devices.

IE had a subacute evolution, with significant differences in the duration of symptoms, being longer in the SbI group (46.9 (± 46.5) vs. 30.4 (± 40.9) days). Patients with IE due to SbII had less bivalvular involvement than those with IE due to SbI. Heart failure was more common in patients with SbII IE. Embolic events or discitis were high in both groups, but without statistical significance. Colonoscopy was performed in 77.1% of patients, with high rates of colorectal neoplasia in both groups, but without statistical significant differences. Likewise, there were no differences in the need for valve replacement or mortality between the two groups (Table 2).

Table 2.

Comparative between S. bovis biotype I and II infective endocarditis with regard to demographic characteristics, clinical features and outcome.

  S.bovis IN=199  S. bovis IIN=59  p value 
Percent of total endocarditis  10.1% (199/1952)  3.0% (59/1952)  <0.001 
Percent of total SBEC bacteremias  68.1% (199/292)  13.7% (59/429a<0.001 
Age, mean (±SD, years)  68.5 (±11.7)  73.0 (±12.5)  0.01 
Male sex  156 (78.3%)  40 (78.6%)  0.09 
Predisposing heart disease  124 (62.3%)  48 (81.3%)  0.006 
Prosthetic valve  42 (21.1%)  25 (42.3%)  0.001 
Degenerative valve disease  60 (30.1%)  11 (18.6%)  0.08 
Intravascular devices  7 (3.5%)  6(10.1%)  0.04 
Others  15 (7.5%)  6 (10.1%)  0.5 
Comorbidities  78 (39.1%)  32 (54.2%).  0.04 
Diabetes mellitus  41 (20.6%)  19 (32.2%)  0.06 
Liver cirrhosis  17 (8.5%)  8 (13.5%)  0.2 
Intravenous drug use  1(0.5%)  1 (1.7%)  0.3 
Non-colorectal neoplasm  24 (12.0%)  3 (5.0%)  0.1 
End stage renal failure  17 (8.5%)  11 (18.6%)  0.02 
Immunosuppressive condition  11 (5.5%)  6 (10.1%)  0.2 
Age adjusted Charlson  5±2.03  6.9±1.46  0.03 
Colorectalneoplasmb  122/157 (77.7%)  28/42 (66.6%)  0.14 
Adenomas  95 (47.7%)c  23 (38.9%)d  0.5 
Carcinomas  27 (17.9%)  5 (11.9%)  0.4 
Colonoscopy  157 (78.9%)  42 (71.2%)  0.2 
Symptoms duration in days, mean (±SD)  46.9 (± 46.5)  30.4 (± 40.9)  0.01 
Fever  166 (83.4%)  43 (72.8%)  0.06 
Number of positive blood cultures, mean (±SD)  4.1 (±1.8)  3.3 (± 1.6)  0.002 
Affected valve       
Mitral alone  52 (26.1%)  15 (25.4%)  0.9 
Aortic alone  78 (39.1%)  31 (52.5%)  0.06 
Aortic and mitral  47 (23.6%)  7 (11.8%)  0.05 
Tricuspid  2 (1.0%)  0.9 
Intravascular devices  7 (3.5%)  6 (10.1%)  0.04 
Others  2 (2.5%)  0.9 
Vegetations  137 (68.8%)  30 (50.8%)  0.01 
Heart failure  49 (24.6%)  23 (38.9%)  0.03 
Embolisms  70 (35.1%)  16 (27.1%)  0.2 
Vertebral osteomyelitis  22 (11.1%)  8 (13.5%)  0.6 
Septic arthritis  15 (7.5%)  5 (8.4%)  0.8 
Duke criteria       
Definite  155 (77.8%)  40 (67.7%)  0.11 
Possible  44 (22.2%)  19 (32.3%)  0.11 
Cardiac surgery during hospitalization  21 (10.5%)  4 (6.7%)  0.3 
In-hospital mortality  25 (12.5%)  9 (15.2%)  0.5 
a

121 S. infantarius, 182 S. pasteurianus, 126 SbII.

b

Patients undergoing colonoscopy.

c

53 were advanced adenomas.

d

15 were advanced adenomas.

Table 3.

Literature review. Reported cases of endocarditis among bacteremia cases caused by Streptococcus bovis-equinus complex.

First author/country (Ref.)  S. gallolyticus subsp. gallolyticusEndocarditis/Bacteremia  S. infantariusEndocarditis/Bacteremia  S. gallolyticus subsp. pasteurianusEndocarditis/Bacteremia 
Ruoff/USA (3)  16/17  1/10  2/7 
Claridge/USA (4)  1/1  1/2  3/10 
Tripodi/Italy (5)  18/20  0/1  4/4 
Beck/Germany (6)  9/21  4/14  0/11 
Gómez-Garcés/Spain (7)  10/15  2/5  2/24 
Romero/Spain (8)  1/14  0/7  6/24 
Vaska/Australia (9)  6/10  0/1  1/5 
Lazarovitch/Israel (10)  6/14  0/5  3/13 
Sheng/Taiwan (11)  16/31  0/15  17/126 
Marmolin/Denmark (12)  10/19  3/19  4/12 
Total (% endocarditis)  93/162 (57.4%)  11/79 (13.9%)  42/236 (7.7%) 
Our series/Spain  199/292 (68.1%)  17/121 (14.0%)  33/182 (18.1%) 
Discussion

Our study agrees with previous data on important regional differences in incidence and predominant species of SBEC causing IE.15,17,18 Although the reasons are not well known, a higher incidence of bacteremia and IE caused by SBEC has been described in rural areas.13 Thus, in a French study16 several differences were found in the incidence of SBEC IE between a rural region (Marne) and an exclusively urban region (Ille de France), (23.9 vs. 11.4 cases/million person-years, respectively). It was similar to those found in our study when comparing a predominantly rural area (HL) and an exclusively urban area (HB): 27.9 vs. 7.1/106. This incidence in the HL area is even higher than in any region of France, which is the country with the highest reported incidence of IE due to Sb.17 Recently, a case of IE with possible zoonotic transmission has been reported26 and there is evidence of increased intestinal colonization by SGG in people in contact with animals or manure.27 Likewise, in Galicia (where the HL and HF are located), a higher incidence of cases of bacteremia caused by SBEC has been found in areas with a high density of cattle.28 It should noted that this region is the largest producer of cattle and milk in Spain, and France is one of the largest producers of cattle in Europe.28

Our data also confirm that SGG has a greater association with IE than the other species, being most of SBEC IE cases due to SGG (3–12, Table 3). However, it should be noted that in those areas where S. gallolyticus pasteurianus is the predominant species causing bacteremia, the proportion of IE caused by this species can be significantly increased, as occurred in one of the centers participating in our study (HB) as well as in other institutions.4,8 We have also detected a high association of S. infantarius subsp. infantarius with IE, as have been suggested in a previous study,21 although more data are needed to confirm these results.

To our knowledge, there are no previous studies comparing the characteristics of IE caused by different species of SBEC. In our series, patients with IE caused by microorganisms included in the former Sb II are even older than patients with IE caused by Sb I, had more comorbidities and predisposing heart illness. The older age could partially explain why the former have a higher percentage of heart failure. However, despite being older and having a higher frequency of heart failure, and more comorbidities, they do not need a higher rate of valve replacement surgery or had greater mortality.

The presence of pre-existing valve disease is not a main characteristic of IE caused by SGG in some reports.16

Its ability to adhere to collagen in the colon and heart valves may explain its high association with CRC and IE, even on healthy valves. Although less known, the other Sb species do not have this ability to adhere to healthy valves. This could explain the high percentage of IE associated with prosthetic devices that we found in cases of IE caused by SGP and SI, which could illustrate a lower pathogenicity of these species compared to SGG.

Another relevant finding in our study was the high percentage of CRC found in IE caused by SGP and SI. Over the last years, the need to perform a colonoscopy in those patients with bacteremia or IE caused by SGG has been clearly established, because of the high frequency of occult neoplasms.3,14 However, in the case of Sb II bacteremia, its indication is controversial.29 A small preliminary study suggested the need to perform colonoscopy in these cases of IE caused by Sb II, due to the high frequency of neoplasms.13 Our study confirms these previous findings, although more studies are needed to confirm these results. In this line, recent studies have shown that SGG is found in a high percentage of tumor tissues in cancer patients (74%) but not S. pasteurianus (11%), the former being implicated in the development of colorectal cancer.30 However, a later study showed that not all SGG strains promoted the development of colorectal cancer.31 On the other hand, a study conducted in Africa showed that colorectal colonization by S. infantarius subsp. infantarius was associated with colorectal cancer.32

Strengths and weaknesses of our study. The present study includes a high number of patients with IE and a high percentage with a colon examination. Our series come from 3 centers, two of them without cardiac surgery, which eliminates referral bias, and describes the clinical characteristics of IE caused by Sb species other than SGG. Although it incorporates the new SBEC taxonomy, an important limitation of the study is that a molecular study was not carried out in all isolates. Although most species can be reasonably distinguished by conventional methods, certain species and subspecies such as S. equinus and those of the S. infantarius group require molecular methods for their proper identification.1,2,21 In recent years, MALDI-TOF MS has emerged as a fast and cost-effective methodology for identification of microorganisms but the high similarity in mass spectral patterns of some strains of the SBEC may hinder the differentiation at species/subspecies level.33 New studies are needed with greater number of patients and identification at molecular level to better define differences among species and subspecies of the former Sb biotype II causing IE.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References
[1]
C. Jans, L. Meile, C. Lacroix, M.J. Stevens.
Genomics, evolution, and molecular epidemiology of the Streptococcus bovis/Streptococcus equinus complex (SBSEC).
Infect Genet Evol, 33 (2015), pp. 419-436
[2]
J. Corredoira, R. Rabuñal, M.P. Alonso.
Streptococcus bovis: 100 years of an intriguing pathogen.
Clin Microbiol Newslett, 39 (2017), pp. 1-9
[3]
K. Ruoff, S.I. Miller, C.V. Garner, M.J. Ferraro, S.B. Calderwood.
Bacteremia with Streptococcus bovis and Streptococcus salivarius: clinical correlates of more accurate identification of isolates.
J Clin Microbiol, 27 (1989), pp. 305-308
[4]
J. Clardrige, S. Attori, Q. Zhang, J. Bartell.
16 S ribosomal DNA sequence analysis distinguishes biotypes of Streptococcus bovis: Streptococcus bovis biotype II/2 is a separate genospecies and the predominant clinical isolate in adult males.
J Clin Microbiol, 39 (2001), pp. 1549-1552
[5]
M. Tripodi, R. Fortunato, R. Utili, M. Triassi, R. Zarilli.
Molecular epidemiology of Streptococcus bovis causing endocarditis and bacteraemia in Italian patients.
Clin Microbiol Infect, 11 (2005), pp. 814-819
[6]
M. Beck, R. Frodl, G. Funke.
Comprehensive study of strains previously designated Streptococcus bovis consecutively isolated from human blood cultures and emended description of Streptococcus gallolyticus and Streptococcus infantarius subsp. coli.
J Clin Microbiol, 46 (2008), pp. 2966-2972
[7]
J.L. Gómez-Garcés, Y. Gil, A. Burillo, I. Wilhelmi, M. Palomo.
Diseases associated with bloodstream infections caused by the new species included in the old Streptococcus bovis group.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin, 30 (2012), pp. 175-179
[8]
B. Romero, M.I. Morosini, E. Loza, M. Rodríguez-Baños, E. Navas, R. Cantón, et al.
Reidentification of Streptococcus bovis isolates causing bacteremia according to the new taxonomy criteria: still an issue?.
J Clin Microbiol, 49 (2011), pp. 3228-3233
[9]
V.L. Vaska, J.L. Faoagali.
Streptococcus bovis bacteraemia: identification within organism complex and association with endocarditis and colonic malignancy.
Pathology, 41 (2009), pp. 183-186
[10]
T. Lazarovitch, M. Shango, M. Levine, et al.
The relationship between the new taxonomy of Streptococcus bovis and its clonality to colon cancer, endocarditis, and biliary disease.
Infection, 41 (2013), pp. 329-337
[11]
W.H. Sheng, Y.C. Chuang, L.J. Teng, P.R. Hsueh.
Bacteraemia due to Streptococcus gallolyticus subspecies pasteurianus is associated with digestive tract malignancies and resistance to macrolides and clindamycin.
J Infect, 69 (2014), pp. 145-153
[12]
E.S. Marmolin, G.N. Hartmeyer, J.J. Christensen, et al.
Bacteremia with the bovis group streptococci: species identification and association with infective endocarditis and with gastrointestinal disease.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 85 (2016), pp. 239-242
[13]
J. Corredoira, I. Grau, J.F. Garcia-Rodriguez, et al.
The clinical epidemiology and malignancies associated with Streptococcus bovis biotypes in 506 cases of bloodstream infections.
J Infect, 71 (2015), pp. 317-325
[14]
J. Corredoira, F. García-Garrote, R. Rabuñal, et al.
Association between bacteremia due to Streptococcus gallolyticus subsp. gallolyticus (Streptococcus bovis I) and colorectal neoplasia: a case–control study.
Clin Infect Dis, 55 (2012), pp. 491-496
[15]
D.R. ICE Murdoch, G.R. Corey, B. Hoen, et al.
Clinical presentation, etiology, and outcome of infective endocarditis in the 21st century: the International Collaboration on Endocarditis-Prospective Cohort Study.
Arch Intern Med, 169 (2009), pp. 463-473
[16]
E. Giannitsioti, C. Chirouze, A. Bouvet, et al.
Characteristics and regional variations of group D streptococcal endocarditis in France.
Clin Microbiol Infect, 13 (2007), pp. 770-776
[17]
B. Hoen, C. Chirouze, C.H. Cabell, et al.
Emergence of endocarditis due to group D streptococci: findings derived from the merged database of the International Collaboration on Endocarditis.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 24 (2005), pp. 12-16
[18]
J. Corredoira, M.J. García-País, A. Coira, et al.
Differences between endocarditis caused by Streptococcus bovis and Enterococcus spp. and their association with colorectal cancer.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 34 (2015), pp. 1657-1665
[19]
M. Tripodi, L. Adinolfi, E. Ragone, et al.
Clinical features of Streptococcus bovis endocarditis and its association with chronic liver disease: an underestimated risk factor.
Clin Infect Dis, 34 (2004), pp. 1394-1400
[20]
W. Nasomsong, V. Vasikasin, J. Traipattanakul, D. Changpradub.
Is echocardiography mandatory for all Streptococcus gallolyticus subs. pasteurianus bacteremia?.
Infect Drug Resist, 13 (2020), pp. 2425-2432
[21]
J. Corredoira Sánchez, F. García-Garrote, M.J. García-País, et al.
Endocarditis caused by Streptococcus infantarius subsp. infantarius: a report of two cases.
Int J Clin Pract, 68 (2014), pp. 653-654
[22]
J.S. Li, D.J. Sexton, N. Mick, et al.
Proposed modifications to the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis.
Clin Infect Dis, 30 (2000), pp. 633-638
[23]
Manual de clinical microbiology, 9th ed.,
[24]
C. Poyart, G. Quesne, P. Trieu-Cuot.
Taxonomic dissection of the Streptococcus bovis group by analysis of manganese-dependent superoxide dismutase gene (sodA) sequences: reclassification of ‘Streptococcus infantarius subsp. coli as Streptococcus lutetiensis sp. nov. and of Streptococcus bovis biotype II.2 as Streptococcus pasteurianus sp. nov.
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, 52 (2002), pp. 1247-1255
[25]
Censo 29. Instituto Galego de Estadística. Available from: http://www.ige.eu/igebdt/selector.jsp?COD=100&paxina=001&c=0201001002 [accessed 7.3.15].
[26]
J. Dumke, D. Hinse, T. Vollmer, J. Schulz, C. Knabbe, J. Dreier.
Potential transmission pathways of Streptococcus gallolyticus subsp. gallolyticus.
PLOS ONE, 10 (2015), pp. e0126507
[27]
J. Dumke, T. Vollmer, O. Akkermann, C. Knabbe, J. Dreier.
Case–control study: determination of potential risk factors for the colonization of healthy volunteers with Streptococcus gallolyticus subsp. gallolyticus.
PLOS ONE, 12 (2017), pp. e0176515
[28]
J. Corredoira, E. Miguez, L.M. Mateo, et al.
GESBOGA Correlation between Streptococcus bovis bacteremia and density of cows in Galicia, northwest of Spain.
Infection, 47 (2019), pp. 399-407
[29]
J.C. Corredoira-Sánchez, F. García-Garrote, A. Coira, H. López-Agreda, M.P. Alonso-García.
Colorectal neoplasia associated with Streptococcus gallolyticus subspecies pasteurianus.
Lancet Infect Dis, 14 (2014), pp. 272-273
[30]
R. Kumar, J.L. Herold, D. Schady, J. Davis, S. Kopetz, M. Martinez-Moczygemba, et al.
Streptococcus gallolyticus subsp. gallolyticus promotes colorectal tumor development.
PLoS Pathog, 13 (2017), pp. e1006440
[31]
R. Kumar, J.L. Herold, J. Taylor, J. Xu, Y. Xu.
Variations among Streptococcus gallolyticus subsp. gallolyticus strains in connection with colorectal cancer.
[32]
D.W. Kaindi, W. Kogi-Makau, G.N. Lule, B. Kreikemeyer, P. Renault, B. Bonfoh, et al.
Investigating the association between spontaneously fermentated dairy products, fecal carriage of Streptococcus infantarius subsp. infantarius and colorectal adenocarcinoma in Kenya.
[33]
D. Hinse, T. Vollmer, M. Erhard, et al.
Differentiation of species of the Streptococcus bovis/equinus complex by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry in comparison to sodA sequence analyses.
Syst Appl Microbiol, 34 (2011), pp. 5
Copyright © 2021. Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos