metricas
covid
Buscar en
Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica (English Edition)
Toda la web
Inicio Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica (English Edition) Pseudomonas putida bacteremia in pediatric patients: A case series study
Información de la revista
Vol. 41. Núm. 4.
Páginas 221-224 (abril 2023)
Visitas
1334
Vol. 41. Núm. 4.
Páginas 221-224 (abril 2023)
Original article
Acceso a texto completo
Pseudomonas putida bacteremia in pediatric patients: A case series study
Bacteriemia por Pseudomonas putida en niños: serie de casos
Visitas
1334
Micaela Picolloa,
Autor para correspondencia
micaelapicollo@gmail.com

Corresponding author.
, Daiana Karina Ferraroa, Guadalupe Péreza, Vanesa Reijtmanb, Sandra Gomeza, Maria Eva Garciab, Alejandra Mastroiannib, María Teresa Rosanovaa
a Epidemiological Control and Infectious Disease Service, Hospital Nacional de Pediatría SAMIC Prof. Dr. Juan P. Garrahan, Buenos Aires, Argentina
b Microbiology Laboratory, Hospital Nacional de Pediatría SAMIC Prof. Dr. Juan P. Garrahan, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Resumen
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Abstract
Introduction

Bacteria of the genus Pseudomonas act as opportunistic pathogens. Pseudomonas putida has been considered a pathogen of low virulence and susceptible to multiple antibiotics, but in recent years resistant strains have emerged. The objective of this study is to describe the clinical characteristics, evolution and antibiotic resistance of P. putida bacteremia documented in pediatric hospitalized patients.

Methods

Retrospective cases series. Pediatric patients admitted to the Prof. Dr. Juan P. Garrahan Hospital of Buenos Aires City, Argentina, with isolation in blood cultures of P. putida were included, between August 2015 and August 2020.

Results

Sample consisting of 13 patients. Median age: 81 months (IQR 15−163). Ten of the patients were immunocompromised (77%), 11 (85%) had a central venous catheter, 2 (15%) received transfusions prior to the episode of bacteremia, and 6 (46%) had had an invasive procedure within the previous 30 days. Three patients (23%) presented bacteremia secondary to clinical focus and 10 (77%) had central venous catheter-associated bacteremia. All presented fever, 62% (8) evolved with sepsis and 15% (2) with septic shock. Two patients required admission to the intensive care unit (15%), and in 7 (54%) the central venous catheter was removed. None died. The median days of treatment was 14 (IQR 10−14). Resistance to carbapenems was 30%.

Conclusion

All children had underlying comorbidities, most of them immunocompromised. Catheter-associated infection predominated. The sensitivity to antibiotics was variable. Given the emergence of multi-resistant strains, it is essential to know the local epidemiology.

Keywords:
Pseudomonas putida
Bacteremia
Central venous catheter
Nosocomial infection
Resumen
Introducción

Las bacterias del género Pseudomonas actúan como patógenos oportunistas. Pseudomonas putida se ha considerado un patógeno de baja virulencia y sensible a múltiples antibióticos, pero en los últimos años han emergido cepas resistentes. El objetivo de este estudio es describir las características clínicas, la evolución y la resistencia antibiótica de episodios de bacteriemia por P. putida en pacientes pediátricos internados.

Métodos

Serie de casos retrospectiva. Se incluyeron pacientes pediátricos internados en el Hospital Prof. Dr. Juan P. Garrahan de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina, con aislamiento en hemocultivos de P. putida, entre agosto de 2015 y agosto de 2020.

Resultados

Muestra formada por 13 pacientes. Mediana de edad: 81 meses (RIC 15−163 meses). Diez pacientes eran inmunodeprimidos (77%), 11 (85%) tenían catéter venoso central, 2 (15%) recibieron transfusiones antes del episodio de bacteriemia y 6 (46%) habían tenido algún procedimiento invasivo en los 30 días previos. Tres pacientes (23%) presentaron bacteriemia secundaria a foco clínico y 10 (77%) bacteriemia asociada a catéter venoso central. Todos presentaron fiebre, el 62% (8) evolucionó con sepsis y el 15% (2) con shock séptico. Dos pacientes requirieron ingreso en la unidad de cuidados intensivos (15%), y en 7 (54%) se retiró el catéter venoso central. Ninguno falleció. La mediana de días de tratamiento fue de 14 (RIC 10−14). La resistencia a carbapenémicos fue del 30%.

Conclusión

Todos los niños tuvieron comorbilidades subyacentes, en su mayoría inmunodepresión. Predominó la infección asociada a catéter. La sensibilidad a los antibióticos fue variable. Ante la emergencia de cepas multirresistentes, es fundamental conocer la epidemiología local.

Palabras clave:
Pseudomonas putida
Bacteriemia
Catéter venoso central
Infección nosocomial
Texto completo
Introduction

Pseudomonas putida has been documented as the causal agent of several infections in humans. It was previously considered to be a pathogen with low virulence and sensitive to multiple antibiotics1. However, in recent years the emergence of carbapenem resistance through the production of metallo-β-lactamases has been described. Fluoroquinolone-resistant isolates have also been reported2. There are few publications on bacteraemia due to P. putida in paediatrics. A retrospective study of cases of bacteraemia due to P. putida identified at the Hospital Nacional de Pediatría Prof. Dr. Juan P. Garrahan, in Buenos Aires, Argentina, and a literature review was conducted with the aim of describing patients' clinical and evolutionary characteristics. The antimicrobial resistance pattern was also evaluated.

Methods

An observational, retrospective study of a case series was conducted. The Hospital Prof. Dr. Juan P. Garrahan is a tertiary care centre with more than 600 hospital beds and five ICUs and is a referral centre for the entire country.

Patients with documentation in P. putida blood cultures between August 2015 and August 2020 were identified from the hospital's Microbiology Service register. All patients with identification in P. putida blood cultures with clinical relevance in the period studied were included. Patients in whom P. putida was identified on a withdrawn catheter tip without bacteraemia (catheter colonisation) or in whom sample contamination was considered were excluded. Clinical and evolutionary data were recorded: age; sex; underlying disease; immunosuppression; carrier of and type of catheter; invasive procedures in the last month; transfusions prior to the bacteraemia episode; clinical presentation; microbiological categorisation in accordance with the Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines according to: primary bacteraemia, catheter-associated bacteraemia, secondary bacteraemia3; evolution: requirement for ICU, infection relapse, mortality; empiric and targeted antibiotic treatment, removal of central venous catheter (CVC), days of treatment; microbiological data: antimicrobial sensitivity and coinfection.

Blood samples were inoculated in aerobic (BacT/ALERT® PF Plus, bioMérieux, Argentina) and anaerobic (BacT/ALERT® FN Plus, bioMérieux, Argentina) paediatric bottles and incubated in the BacT/ALERT® 3D (bioMérieux, Argentina) system for a period of 5 and 7 days, respectively. Bacterial identification was performed by mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) with VITEK® MS (bioMérieux, Argentina). To predict susceptibility, the minimum inhibitory concentrations were determined with the VITEK®2 Compact (bioMérieux, Argentina) automated method and by diffusion using the epsilometric method; cut-off points from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute were considered for other non-Enterobacteriaceae4. The detection of metallo-β-lactamases was carried out with phenotypic methods by diffusion through imipenem-meropenem-ethylenediaminetetraacetic (EDTA) disk synergy.

Continuous variables are summarised as median and interquartile range (IQR) and categorical variables as frequency and percentage. Stata® 16 was used for the statistical analysis.

The identity of the patients and their families was protected during the review of the medical records and the data. The publication of the work was approved by the hospital’s Ethics Committee.

Results

During the study period, 13 patients who met the inclusion criteria were identified. The median age was 81 months (IQR 15−163 months), and 9 of the patients (69%) were male. All of them had underlying disease. The comorbidities were: 7 patients (54%) with oncohaematological disease, 2 patients with intestinal failure secondary to visceral myopathy and short bowel syndrome, respectively (15%), 1 liver transplant patient (8%), another one (8%) with primary immunodeficiency (agranulocytosis), another one with bone marrow aplasia (8%) and finally one patient with complex uropathy (8%). 77% of patients in this series (n = 10) were immunocompromised hosts (Table 1).

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics of the 13 patients with isolation of Pseudomonas putida.

Variable  n (%) 
Median age in months (IQR)  81 (15−163) 
Male sex  9 (69) 
Immunosuppression  10 (77) 
Solid tumour  4 (40) 
Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia  2 (20) 
Lymphoma  1 (10) 
Primary immunodeficiency  1 (10) 
Bone marrow aplasia  1 (10) 
Liver transplant  1 (10) 
Use of CVC  11 (85) 
Types of bacteraemia   
CVC-associated  10 (77) 
Secondary  3 (23) 
Clinical focus  3 (23) 
Gastrointestinal  2 (66) 
Renal abscess  1 (33) 
Sepsis  8 (62) 
Septic shock  3 (23) 
ICU admission  2 (15) 
Median days of treatment (IQR)  14 (10−14) 
CVC removal  7 (54) 
Coinfection  3 (23) 
Klebsiella pneumoniae  1 (33) 
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia  1 (33) 
Staphylococcus aureus  1 (33) 

CVC: central venous catheter; ICU: intensive care unit; IQR: interquartile range.

11 patients (85%) had a CVC at the time of bacteraemia. The type of CVC was: a semi-implantable catheter in 5 patients, a totally implantable catheter in 4 patients and a short-term catheter in 2 patients. Six (6) patients (46%) had undergone surgery in the 30 days prior to bacteraemia, while 2 patients (15%) had a history of transfusion in the 48 h prior to it. Polymicrobial infection was recorded in 3 patients (Table 1).

Regarding clinical presentation, all the patients had fever at the time of bacteraemia, 8 (62%) evolved with sepsis and 2 (15%) with septic shock. In 10 patients (77%) it was categorised as CVC-associated bacteraemia. Two (2) patients required admission to the ICU for the infection. The CVC was removed from 7 patients (54%). The reasons for removing the CVC were: in 2 patients (15%) due to infection associated with a short-term catheter, in 2 patients (15%) due to septic shock, in 1 patient (8%) as venous access was not required, in another patient (8%) due to the persistence of CVC-associated bacteraemia by P. putida and in the last patient (8%) due to polymicrobial infection.

The median length of antibiotic treatment was 14 days (IQR 10−14 days).

Empiric treatment was monotherapy in 5 patients (38%) and combined with aminoglycosides in 8 patients (62%).

Carbapenem resistance was documented in 4 isolates of P. putida. All 4 were resistant to meropenem, and resistance to imipenem was also documented in 2 of them. In 2strains, the resistance mechanism was the production of metallo-β-lactamases. Resistance to ciprofloxacin and amikacin was not documented in any of the strains.

Definitive treatment was tailored according to documented susceptibility to antimicrobials (Table 2). In carbapenem-resistant isolates, combined treatment was indicated according to the antibiogram (ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin or piperacillin-tazobactam with amikacin). The definitive treatments are summarised in Table 3. There were no infection-related patiet deaths.

Table 2.

Resistance profiles of the Pseudomonas putida isolates.

  Sensitive  Non-sensitivea 
Imipenem 
Meropenem  4b 
Ceftazidime  11 
Colistin 
Gentamicin  11  – 
Ciprofloxacin  13  – 
Piperacillin/tazobactam  11 
Cefepime 
Amikacin  13  – 
a

Resistant strains and strains with intermediate sensitivity.

b

The 2 imipenem-resistant strains were also resistant to meropenem.

Table 3.

Definitive antibiotic treatment.

Treatment  n (%) 
Monotherapy   
Piperacillin/tazobactam  4 (31) 
Combined treatment   
Piperacillin/tazobactam + amikacin  3 (23) 
Piperacillin/tazobactam + ciprofloxacin  1 (8) 
Ceftazidime + amikacin  2 (15) 
Ciprofloxacin + amikacin  1 (8) 
Ciprofloxacin + colistin  1 (8) 
Meropenem + ciprofloxacin  1 (8) 
Discussion

P. putida is an aerobic gram-negative bacillus belonging, together with Pseudomonas fluorescens and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, to the fluorescent group of the Pseudomonas genus. They are environmental microorganisms with a predilection for humid environments. They are reported in outbreaks from contaminated solutions such as distilled water, disinfectants and transfusions, among others1,5,6. Unlike P. aeruginosa, which is associated with enteritis, sepsis and serious skin and soft tissue infections in patients with comorbidities, P. putida generally presents as bacteraemia associated with endovascular devices.

Since the first reports of bacteraemia due to P. putida, this opportunistic pathogen has played a major role, causing infections in hospitalised patients, with underlying diseases, mainly immunosuppressed, post-surgical and CVC carriers, similar to the patients in this series5,7–9.

In a literature review published in 2011, Yoshino et al. described 28 adult patients with bacteraemia due to P. putida. Of 21 cases in which the site of infection was identified, 12 were CVC-associated bacteraemia. In the aforementioned review, coinciding with the characteristics of the patients in our series, immunocompromised patients predominated8. More recently, Tan et al. reported 44 infections with identification of P. putida in different samples (blood, urine, sputum). Immunocompromised patients and patients with endovascular devices also predominated. Only 4 patients in that series were paediatric9.

As in other catheter-associated infections, the recommended treatment is antibiotic therapy with or without removal of the prosthetic material or catheter3. In the published series, both patients with bacteraemia due to P. putida in which the CVC was removed and cases in which antibiotic treatment was performed without its removal and with a good response were reported7,10. In our series, the indication to remove the CVC was individualised, taking each patient's clinical and microbiological aspects into account and the catheter was maintained in half of the patients without any complications.

In recent years, multiresistant strains of P. putidahave been reported11,12. The resistance mechanisms described for the Pseudomonas genus are: hyperproduction of efflux pumps, reduced expression of porins in its outer membrane, chromosomal mutations in topoisomerase genes and acquisition of resistance-transmitting plasmids, among others. In most cases, carbapenem resistance is due to the VIM and IMP enzymes13. Identification of KPC-2 and resistance to all antimicrobial agents except polymyxin B in a child with bacteraemia has also been reported14. P. putida could act as a reservoir and dispersal vector for these resistance mechanisms, representing a serious public health problem15. Depending on each strain's resistance mechanisms, different profiles of antibiotic sensitivity are observed. The hyperproduction of efflux pumps can be associated with selective resistance to carbapenems, without other β-lactam antibiotics such as ceftazidime or piperacillin-tazobactam being affected. In the series presented, the search for resistance mechanisms using molecular methods was not performed systematically16.

However, the different resistance profiles to different β-lactams in this series could be explained by resistance mediated by efflux pumps and impermeability.

In our experience, patient evolution was favourable with antibiotic treatment, with or without the removal of the central venous catheter (CVC). Infection relapse was documented in a single patient, who evolved favourably following removal of the CVC.

The exact mortality rate is unknown. Adults have a good prognosis9.

Although the series presented is the largest in the paediatric population available to date, the work's main weak point is the lack of data on antimicrobial sensitivity and resistance mechanisms in some of the P. putida isolates, which is related to the research's retrospective nature.

Conclusions

In this series of children with bacteraemia due to P. putida, all the patients had underlying comorbidities, and catheter-associated infection predominated. The CVC was maintained in half of the patients. There were no infection-related patiet deaths. In our series, the sensitivity to antibiotics was variable. The emergence of multiresistant strains makes it difficult to standardise an empiric treatment, hence it is essential to understand each institution's epidemiology.

Funding

This study received no external funding.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References
[1]
R. Araos, E. D’Agata.
Chapter 2019: Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other Pseudomonas species.
Mandell, Douglas and Benett’s principles and practice of infectious diseases, 9th ed., pp. 2686-2699
[2]
M. Radice, M. Marin, M. Giovanakis, C. Vay, M. Almuzara, A. Limansky, et al.
Criterios de ensayo, interpretación e informe de las pruebas de sensibilidad a los antibióticos en los bacilos gram negativos no fermentadores de importancia clínica: recomendaciones de la Subcomisión de Antimicrobianos de la Sociedad Argentina de Bacteriología, Micología y Parasitología Clínicas. Asociación Argentina de Microbiología.
Rev Arg Microbiol, 43 (2011), pp. 136-153
[3]
L.A. Mermel, M. Allon, E. Bouza, D.E. Craven, P. Flynn, N.P. O’Grady, et al.
Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related infection: 2009 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.
Clin Infect Dis, 49 (2009), pp. 1-45
[4]
M.P. Weinstein, J.S. Lewis 2nd, A.P. Bobenchik, S. Campeau, S.K. Cullen, M.F. Galas, et al.
Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
30th ed, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, (2020),
[5]
O. Bouallegue, R. Mzoughi, F.X. Weill, N. Mahdhaoui, Y.B. Salem, H. Sboui, et al.
Outbreak of Pseudomonas putida bacteraemia in a neonatal intensive care unit.
J Hosp Infect, 57 (2004), pp. 88-91
[6]
J.F. Perz, A.S. Craig, C.W. Stratton, S.J. Bodner, W.E.Jr. Phillips, W. Schaffner.
Pseudomonas putida septicemia in a special care nursery due to contaminated flush solutions prepared in a hospital pharmacy.
J Clin Microbiol, 43 (2005), pp. 5316-5318
[7]
E. Anaissie, V. Fainstein, P. Miller, H. Kassamali, S. Pitlik, G.P. Bodey, et al.
Pseudomonas putida. Newly recognized pathogen in patients with cancer.
Am J Med, 82 (1987), pp. 1191-1194
[8]
Y. Yoshino, T. Kitazawa, K. Kamimura, K. Tatsuno, Y. Ota, H. Yotsuyanagi.
Pseudomonas putida bacteremia in adult patients: five case reports and a review of the literature.
J Infect Chemother, 17 (2011), pp. 278-282
[9]
G. Tan, Y. Xi, P. Yuan, Z. Sun, D. Yang.
Risk factors and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Pseudomonas putida infection in Central China, 2010– 2017.
Medicine, 98 (2019), pp. e17812
[10]
C. Aumeran, C. Paillard, F. Robin, J. Kanold, O. Baud, R. Bonnet, et al.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Pseudomonas putida outbreak associated with contaminated water outlets in an oncohaematology paediatric unit.
J Hosp Infect, 65 (2019), pp. 47-53
[11]
G. Lombardi, F. Luzzaro, J.D. Docquier, M.L. Riccio, M. Perilli, A. Colí, et al.
Nosocomial infections caused by multidrug-resistant isolates of Pseudomonas putida producing VIM-1 metallo-beta-lactamase.
J Clin Microbiol, 40 (2002), pp. 4051-4055
[12]
H.S. Sader, R.N. Jones.
Antimicrobial susceptibility of uncommonly isolated non-enteric Gram-negative bacilli.
Int J Antimicrob Agents, 25 (2005), pp. 95-109
[13]
S.E. Kim, S.-H. Park, H.B. Park, K.-H. Park, S.-H. Kim, S.-I. Jung, et al.
Nosocomial Pseudomonas putida bacteremia: high rates of carbapenem resistance and mortality.
Chonnam Med J, 48 (2012), pp. 91-95
[14]
A.C.S. Almeida, M.A. Vilela, F.L.S. Cavalcanti, W.M.B.S. Martins, M.A. Morais Jr., M.M.C. Morais.
First description of KPC-2-producing Pseudomonas putida in Brazil.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 56 (2012), pp. 2205-2206
[15]
S. Peter, P. Oberhettinger, L. Schuele, A. Dinkelacker, W. Vogel, D. Dörfel, et al.
Genomic characterisation of clinical and environmental Pseudomonas putida group strains and determination of their role in the transfer of antimicrobial resistance genes to Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
BMC Genomics, 18 (2017), pp. 859
[16]
C.J. Nicolau, A. Oliver.
Carbapenemasas en especies del genero Pseudomonas.
EnfermInfecc Microbiol Clin, 28 Suppl 1 (2010), pp. 19-28
Copyright © 2021. Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos