Motivaciones de los investigadores académicos en Colombia, para generar y transferir conocimiento al sector productivo usando análisis de correlación canónica

Viana Barcelo, Rafael Antonio

doi:10.1016/S0123-5923(12)70219-X

Información del artículo

Resumen

Bibliografía

Descargar PDF

Estadísticas

Resumen

En el presente documento se presenta evidencia empírica acerca de las motivaciones que tienen los investigadores académicos en Colombia, así como también, la disponibilidad de los mismos para generar y transferir conocimiento al sector productivo en el marco de la relación universidad-empresa. Los datos utilizados en el estudio se recopilaron a través de una encuesta aplicada a los investigadores académicos que aparecen registrados en la base de datos del Departamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (colciencias). Losdatos fueron analizados a través de análisis de regresiones canónico y se logro determinar que las actividades de transferencia de conocimiento objeto del estudio (consultorías y comercialización de tecnología) son complementarias.

Palabras clave:

Transferencia de conocimiento

análisis de regresiones canónico

investigadores

universidad-industria

Keywords:

Knowledge transfer

canonical regression analysis

researchers

university-industry

Abstract

This document presents empirical evidence about the motivations of academic researchers in Colombia, and their availability to generate and transfer knowledge to the productive sector within the framework of the relation between universities and companies. The data used in the study was collected through a survey of academic researchers listed in the database of the Administrative Department of Science, Technology and Innovation (colciencias).The data was examined by means of an analysis of canonical regressions. The analysis revealed that the knowledge transfer activities object of the study (consultancies and technology marketing) are complementary.

Resumo

No presente documento se apresenta a evidência empírica acerca das motivações dos investigadores acadêmicos na Colômbia, bem como da disponibilidade dos mesmos para gerar e transferir conhecimentos ao setor produtivo no âmbito da relação universidade-empresa. Os dados usados no estudo foram coletados através de uma pesquisa aplicada aos investigadores acadêmicos que aparecem registrados no banco de dados do Departamento Administrativo de Ciências, Tecnologia e Inovação (colciencias). Osdados foram analisados através da análise de regressão canônica e se conseguiu determinar que as atividades de transferência do conhecimento que foram objeto do estudo (consultorias e comercialização de tecnologia) são complementares.

Palavras-chave:

Transferência do conhecimento

análise de regressão canônica

investigadores

universidade-indústria

El Texto completo está disponible en PDF

Referencias bibliográficas

[Anderson et al., 2007]

T. Anderson, T. Daim, E. Lavoie.

Measuring the efficiency of university technology transfer.

Technovation, 27 (2007), pp. 306-318

[Arrow, 1974]

K. Arrow.

Limited Knowledge and Economic Analysis.

American Economic Review, 64 (1974), pp. 1-10

[Bessant and Rush, 1995]

J. Bessant, H. Rush.

Building bridges for innovation: the role of consultants in technology transfer.

Research Policy, 24 (1995), pp. 97-114

[Bercovitz and Feldman, 2006]

J. Bercovitz, M. Feldman.

Entre-preneurial Universities and Technology Transfer: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Knowledge-Based Economic Development.

The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31 (2006), pp. 175-188

[Blumenthal et al., 1996]

D. Blumenthal, E. Campbell, N. Causino, L. Seashore.

Participation Of Life-Science Faculty In Research Relationships With Industry.

The New England journal of Medicine, 355 (1996), pp. 1734-1739

[Bozeman, 2000]

B. Bozeman.

Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory.

Research Policy, 29 (2000), pp. 627-655

[Bozeman and Gaughan, 2007]

B. Bozeman, M. Gaughan.

Impacts of grants and contracts on academic researchers interactions with industry.

Research Policy, 36 (2007), pp. 694-707

[Daza and Slaughter, 1999]

T. Daza, S. Slaughter.

Faculty and Administrators Attitudes toward Potential Confiicts of Interest Commitment, and Equity in University-Industry Relationships.

The Journal of Higher Education, 70 (1999), pp. 309-352

[D’este and Perkmann, 2010]

P. D’este, M. Perkmann.

Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivation.

Journal of Technology Transfer, 36 (2010), pp. 316-339

[Diamant et al., 2007]

Diamant, R. & Pugatch, M. (2007). Measuring Technology Transfer Performance in Public-Private Partnerships. Prepared for the ipAcademy in Israel, Meeting of the Tech Transfer Group. Recuperado de: http://www.stockholm-network.org/downloads/publications/ip/Measuring_ TT_Performance.pdf. in press.

[Fridh and Carlsson, 2002]

F. Fridh, B. Carlsson.

Special issue: Technology transfer in United Sta-tes universities.

Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12 (2002), pp. 199-232

[Gulbrandsen and Smeby, 2005]

M. Gulbrandsen, J. Smeby.

Industry funding and university professors’ research performance.

Research Policy, 34 (2005), pp. 932-950

[Gutiérrez et al., 2008]

Gutiérrez, A., Manjarrés, L. & Vega, J. (2008). University-Industry Relations And Academic Research: Coexistence Or Something Else. ingenioWorking Paper Series 2008-05. Recuperado de:http://hdl.handle.net/10261/5217

[Hair et al., 2006]

J. Hair, W. Black, B. Babin, R. Anderson, R. Tatham.

Multivariate data analysis.

6th, Pearson, (2006),

[Heisey and Adelman, 2011]

P. Heisey, S. Adelman.

Research expenditures, technology transfer activity, and university licensing revenue.

The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36 (2011), pp. 38-60

[Helm and Mauroner, 2007]

Helm, R. & Mauroner, O. (2007). Innovation and market characteristics and success of new research-based spin-off products. Jena Research Papers in Business and Economics –Working and Discussion Papers 04/2007, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, School of Economics and Business Administration.

[Jacobson et al., 2005]

N. Jacobson, D. Butterill, P. Goering.

Consulting as a Strategy for Knowledge Transfer.

The Milbank Quarterly, 83 (2005), pp. 299-321

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00348.x | Medline

[Jain and George, 2007]

S. Jain, G. George.

Technology transfer offices as institutional entrepreneurs: the case of Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation and human Embryonic stem cells.

Industrial and Corporate Change, 16 (2007), pp. 535-567

[Jensen et al., 2010]

Jensen, R., Thursby, J. & Thursby, M. (2010). University-Industry Spillovers, Government Funding, and Industrial Consulting. National Bureau of Economic Research- NBER Working Papers. Recuperado de:http://www.nber.org/papers/w15732.pdf?new_window=1

[Lach and Schankerman, 2004]

S. Lach, M. Schankerman.

Royalty sharing and technology licensing in universities.

Journal of The European Economic Association, 2 (2004), pp. 252-264

[Landry et al., 2006]

R. Landry, N. Amara, M. Ouimet.

Determinants of knowledge transfer: evidence from Canadian university researchers in natural sciences and engineering.

Journal of Technology Transfer, 32 (2006), pp. 561-592

[Levy et al., 2009]

R. Levy, P. Roux, S. Wolff.

An analysis of science-industry collaborative patterns in a large European University.

The Journal of Technology Transfer, 34 (2009), pp. 1-23

[Link and Siegel, 2005]

A. Link, D. Siegel.

Generating science-based growth: an econometric analysis of the impact of organizational incentives on university-industry technology transfer.

European Journal of Finance, 11 (2005), pp. 169-181

[Link et al., 2007]

A. Link, S. Siegel, B. Bozeman.

An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to Engage in informal university technology transfer.

Industrial and Corporate Change, 16 (2007), pp. 641-655

[Lockett et al., 2003]

A. Lockett, M. Wright, S. Franklin.

Technology Transfer and Universities’ Spin-Out Strategies.

Small Business Economics, 20 (2003), pp. 185-201

[Mansfield, 1975]

E. Mansfield.

International Technology Transfer: Forms Resource Requirements, and Policies.

The American Economic Review, 65 (1975), pp. 372-376

[Marlow, 1983]

M. Marlow.

A Canonical Correlation Analysis of Savings and Loan Association Performance.

Applied Economics, 15 (1983), pp. 815-820

[Pack and Todaro, 1969]

H. Pack, M. Todaro.

Technological Transfer Labor Absorption, and Economic Development.

Oxford Economic Papers, 21 (1969), pp. 395-403

[Rodríguez, 2005]

A. Rodríguez.

Un modelo integral para evaluar el impacto de la transferencia de conocimiento interorganizacional en el desempeño de la firma.

Estudios Geren-ciales, 96 (2005), pp. 37-50

[Rodríguez, 2007]

A. Rodríguez.

Transferencia de conocimiento en relaciones inter-organi-zacionales: Su efecto sobre el desempeño de la firma receptora.

Estudios Gerenciales, 103 (2007), pp. 12-35

[Roy, 1972]

R. Roy.

University-Industry Interaction Patterns.

Science, 178 (1972), pp. 955-960

http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.178.4064.955 | Medline

[Shane, 2002]

S. Shane.

Executive Forum: University technology transfer to entrepre-neurial companies.

Journal of Business Venturing, 17 (2002), pp. 537-552

[Siegel et al., 2004]

Siegel, D. & Phan, P. (2004). Analyzing the effectiveness of university technology transfer: implications for entrepreneurs-hip education. Rensselaer Working Papers in Economics 0426. Recuperado de: http://www.economics.rpi.edu/workingpapers/rpi0426.pdf.

[Teece, 1977]

D. Teece.

Technology Transfer by Multinational Firms: The Resource Cost of Transferring Technological Know-How.

The Economic Journal, 87 (1977), pp. 242-261

*

Esta investigación contó con el apoyo económico de la dirección de la Escuela de Economía y administración de la Universidad Industrial de Santander.

Indexada en:

Síguenos:

Indexada en:

Síguenos:

Suscríbase a la newsletter