ESTUDIO Y ANÁLISIS DE LAS LISTAS DE DISTRIBUCIÓN EN PROYECTOS DE SOFTWARE DE CÓDIGO ABIERTO COMO MEDIO PARA COMPARTIR CONOCIMIENTO

Martínez Torres, M.R.; Toral Marín, S.L.; Barrero García, F.J.

doi:10.1016/S1135-2523(12)60068-9

Información del artículo

Resumen

Bibliografía

Descargar PDF

Estadísticas

RESUMEN

Este trabajo explora el papel desempeñado por las listas de distribución en proyectos de software de código abierto como herramienta para compartir conocimiento y resolver problemas. Uno de los principales beneficios que las empresas pueden obtener del uso de software de código abierto es la colaboración informal en desarrollo de aplicaciones. La herramienta más importante para esa colaboración y coordinacion son las listas de correo, seguido por los foros de discusión asíncronos, informes de bugs y chat. Uno de los argumentos principales a la hora de decidirse por una distribución de Linux embebido es el soporte proporcionado a los desarrolladores. Pero generalmente, es difícil tomar una decisión a priori sin conocer si el soporte proporcionado será lo suficientemente bueno durante todo el futuro desarrollo del proyecto. Para ayudar en esta tarea, este trabajo se centra en analizar el comportamiento y la actividad de las listas de correo para extraer una serie de parámetros que puedan aportar información sobre la calidad y la evolución de la lista. Esta información resultaría relevante para analizar y decidir sobre la mejor distribución de Linux embebido a utilizar.

PALABRAS CLAVE:

Software de Código Abierto

Listas de Distribución

Linux embebido

Análisis Factor

Sistemas de Información

ABSTRACT

This research explores the role of mailing lists in open source software projects as a tool for knowledge sharing and problem resolution. One of the benefits that firms can derive from using Open Source Software (OSS) is informal development collaboration. The primary tool for collaboration and coordination are group mailing lists, followed by asynchronous discussion forums, bug reports, and chat. One of the main arguments when deciding about an embedded Linux distribution is the support provided to developers. However, it is usually difficult to decide a priori if the provided support will be good enough for the future development of the project. Particularly, the behaviour and activity of mailing list are analyzed to extract a set of parameters that could inform about the quality and the evolution of the list. This information could be useful to decide the best embedded distribution to be implemented.

KEYWORDS:

Open Source Software

Mailing Lists

Embedded Linux

Factor Analysis

Information Systems

El Texto completo está disponible en PDF

BIBLIOGRAFÍA

[ABBOTT, 2003]

D. ABBOTT.

Linux for Embedded and Real Time Applications, Newnes, Elsevier Science, (2003),

[APPLEWHITE, 2003]

A. APPLEWHITE.

“Should governments go Open Source?”.

IEEE Software, 20 (2003), pp. 88-91

[BOLAND and TENKASI, 1995]

R. BOLAND, R. TENKASI.

“Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing”.

Organization Science, 6 (1995), pp. 350-372

[BONACCORSI and & ROSSI, 2003]

A. BONACCORSI, C. ROSSI.

“Why Open Source Software can succeed”.

Research Policy, 32 (2003), pp. 1243-1258

[BROWN and DUGUID, 1998]

J.S. BROWN, P. DUGUID.

“Organizing knowledge”.

California Management Review Spring, 40 (1998), pp. 90-106

[DAHLANDER and MAGNUSSON, 2005]

L. DAHLANDER, M.G. MAGNUSSON.

“Relationships between open source software companies and communities: Observations from Nordic firms”.

Research Policy, 34 (2005), pp. 481-493

[FREE SOFTWARE FOUNDATION, 2001]

FREE SOFTWARE FOUNDATION: GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE (2001): http://www.fsf.org/licenses/gpl.html, [on line] con acceso 2006-12-14.

[GAMBARDELLA and MAY, 2006]

A. GAMBARDELLA, B.H. MAY.

“Proprietary versus public domain licensing of software and research products”.

Research Policy, 35 (2006), pp. 875-892

[GANSSLE, and MICHAEL, 2003]

JACK GANSSLE, BARR MICHAEL.

Embedded Systems Dictionary, CMP Books, (2003),

[GARRETY et al., 2004]

K. GARRETY, P.L. ROBERTSON, R. BADHAM.

“Integrating communities of practice in technology development projects”.

International Journal of Project Management, 22 (2004), pp. 351-358

[GRUBER and HENKEL, 2006]

M. GRUBER, J. HENKEL.

“New ventures based on open innovation – an empirical analysis of start-up firms in embedded Linux”.

International Journal of Technology Management, 33 (2006), pp. 356-372

[GUTWIN et al., 2004]

GUTWIN, C., PENNER, R., SCHNEIDER K. (2004): “Group awareness in distributed software development”, Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Chicago, pp. 72-81.

[HENKEL, 2003]

HENKEL, J. (2003): “Software development in embedded Linux – informal collaboration of competing firms”, Proceedings der 6. Internationalen Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik, Dresden, pp. 1-20.

[HENKEL, 2006]

J. HENKEL.

“Selective revealing in open innovation processes: The case of embedded Linux”.

Research Policy, 35 (2006), pp. 953-969

[HERTEL et al., 2003]

G. HERTEL, S. NIEDNER, S. HERRMANN.

“Motivation of software developers in Open Source projects: An Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel”.

Research Policy, 32 (2003), pp. 1159-1177

[JOHNSON, 2006]

J.P. JOHNSON.

“Collaboration, peer review and open source software”.

Information Economics and Policy, 18 (2006), pp. 477-497

[KOGUT and & METIU, 2001]

B. KOGUT, A. METIU.

“Open Source Software and distributed innovation”.

Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 17 (2001), pp. 248-264

[KROGH et al., 2003]

G. KROGH, S. SPAETH, K. LAKHANI.

“Community, joining, and specialisation in open source software innovation: a case study”.

Research Policy, 32 (2003), pp. 1217-1241

[LAKHANI and HIPPEL, 2003]

K. LAKHANI, E. HIPPEL.

“How open source software works: ‘free’ user to user assistance”.

Research Policy, 32 (2003), pp. 923-943

[LI et al., 2006]

X. LI, A.R. MONTAZEMI, Y. YUAN.

“Agent-based buddy-finding methodology for knowledge sharing”.

Information & Management, 43 (2006), pp. 283-296

http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnu005 | Medline

[MCDONALD, et al., 2003]

C.J. MCDONALD, G. SCHADOW, M. BARNES, P. DEXTER, J.M. OVERHAGE, B. MAMLIN.

“Open Source Software in medical informatics—why, how and what”.

International Journal of Medical Informatics, 69 (2003), pp. 175-184

Medline

[MOCKUS et al., 2002]

A. MOCKUS, R.T. FIELDING, J.D. HERBSLEB.

“Two Case Studies of Open Source Software Development: Apache and Mozilla”.

ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 11 (2002), pp. 309-346

[PAN and LEIDNER, 2003]

S.L. PAN, D.E. LEIDNER.

“Bridging communities of practice with information technology in pursuit of global knowledge sharing”.

Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 12 (2003), pp. 71-88

[PERENS, 1997]

B. PERENS.

The Open Source definition.

(1997)http://www.opensource.org/docs/definition.php

[RAGHAVAN et al., 2006]

P. RAGHAVAN, A. LAD, S. NEELAKANDAN.

Embedded Linux System Design and Development, Auerbach Publications, (2006),

[RAYMOND, 1999]

E.S. RAYMOND.

The cathedral and the bazaar.

(1999)Available at http://www.tuxedo.org/Uesr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/

[RENCHER, 2002]

A.C. RENCHER.

Methods of Multivariate Analysis, 2nd ed. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, John Wiley & Sons, (2002),

[SOWE et al., 2006]

S. SOWE, I. STAMELOS, L. ANGELIS.

“Identifying knowledge brokers that yield software engineering knowledge in OSS projects”.

Information and Software Technology, 48 (2006), pp. 1025-1033

[SPINELLIS and & SZYPERSKI, 2004]

D. SPINELLIS, C. SZYPERSKI.

“How is Open Source affecting software development?”.

IEEE Software, 21 (2004), pp. 28-33

[SPINELLIS, 2006]

D. SPINELLIS.

“Open Source and Professional Advancement”.

IEEE Software, 23 (2006), pp. 70-71

[VALIMAKI, and OKSANEN, 2005]

M. VALIMAKI, V. OKSANEN.

“The impact of free and open source licensing on operating system software markets”.

Telematics and Informatics, 22 (2005), pp. 97-111

[WARING and MADDOCKS, 2005]

T. WARING, P. MADDOCKS.

“Open Source Software implementation in the UKpublic sector: Evidence from the field and implications for the future”.

International Journal of Information Management, 25 (2005), pp. 411-428

[WENGER, 1998]

E. WENGER.

Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity, Cambridge University Press, (1998),

[YAGHMOUR, 2003]

K. YAGHMOUR.

Building Embedded Linux Systems, O'Reilly, (2003),

[ZÁRRAGA OBERTY and SAÁ PÉREZ, 2005]

C. ZÁRRAGA OBERTY, P. SAÁ PÉREZ.

“Comunidades de práctica: equipos de trabajo para la gestión del conocimiento”.

Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 14 (2005), pp. 145-158

Indexada en:

Síguenos:

Indexada en:

Síguenos:

Suscríbase a la newsletter