Información del artículo
RESUMEN
Este artículo presenta diferentes líneas de investigación para extender los actuales trabajos empíricos sobre el papel de las Oficinas de Transferencia de Resultados de Investigación (OTRI). Dichas líneas surgen de los nuevos avances en el análisis micro económico de las OTRIs y se plantean cuestiones cómo la justificación de su existencia, los incentivos de los científicos o la mejor forma de transferir tecnología, licencia o spin-off. Muchas de estas líneas permanecen todavía sin analizar y en las que se dispone de evidencia ésta proviene básicamente de EEUU y UK. La investigación empírica debe fomentar nuevos avances en el ámbito teórico.
PALABRAS CLAVE:
OTRI
Spin-off
Licenciar
Diseño de contratos
Universidad
ABSTRACT
The present paper presents different lines of work in order to extend the current empirical research about the role of the technology transfer offices (TTO). Those lines of research come from the new advances in the micro economic analysis of TTOs and focus on questions such as the economic reasons for the existence of TTOs, the incentives scheme of the scientist and the best way of transferring technology, licensing or spinning-off. Most of these lines still remain without analyzing and the existent evidence comes basically from US and UK. The empirical research should foment new advances in the theoretical approach.
KEYWORDS:
TTO
Spin-off
Licensing
Design of contracts
University
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
BIBLIOGRAFÍA
[AUDRESTSCH, et al., 2006]
D. AUDRESTSCH, E. STAM, J. MEIJAARD.
“Renascent Entrepreneurship”. Erim report series research in management. ERS-2006-017-ORG.
(2006)www.erim.eur.nl
[ARROW, 1962]
K.J. ARROW.
“Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for inventions”.
The rate and direction of economic activity, pp. 609-626
[BERCOVITZ et al., 2001]
J. BERCOVITZ, M. FREDMAN, I. FELLER, R. BURTON.
“Organizational structure as a Determinant of Academic Patent and Licensing Behaviour: An Explanatory Study of Duke, Johns Hopkins, and Pennsylvania State Universities”.
Journal of Technology Transfer, 26 (2001), pp. 21-35
[BIRLEY, 2002]
S. BIRLEY.
“Universities, academics, and spinout companies”.
International Journal of Entrepreneurship education, (2002),
[CHUKUMBA and JENSEN, 2005]
CHUKUMBA, C., JENSEN, R., (2005): “University Inventions, Entrepreneurship and Start-ups”. NBER Working Paper No. W11475.
[Estatuts de la Universitat]
Estatuts de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, May 2003.
[ETZKOWITZ, 1998]
H. ETZKOWITZ.
“The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages”.
Research Policy, 27 (1998), pp. 823-833
[DEL PALACIO et al., 2006]
I. DEL PALACIO, F. SOLÉ, H. MONTIEL.
“University spin-off programmes: How can they support the NBTF creation?”.
International Entrepreneurship Management Journal, 2 (2006), pp. 157-172
[DI GREGORIO and SHANE, 2003]
D. DI GREGORIO, S. SHANE.
“Why do some Universities generate more start-up than others?”.
Research Policy, 32 (2003), pp. 209-227
[DE COSTER and BUTLER, 2005]
R. DE COSTER, C. BUTLER.
“Assessment of proposals for new technology nature in the UK: Characteristics of University Spin-off companies”.
Technovation, 25 (2005), pp. 535-543
[GEUNA et al., 2003]
“Science and Innovation. Rethinking the rationales for funding and governance”, pp. 309-334
[GODFARB and HENREKSON, 2003]
B. GODFARB, M. HENREKSON.
“Bottom-up versus top down policies towards the commercialization of university intellectual property”.
Research Policy, 32 (2003), pp. 639-658
[HINDLE and YENCKEN, 2004]
K. HINDLE, J. YENCKEN.
“Public research commercialization, entrepreneurship and new technology based firms”.
Technovation, 24 (2004), pp. 793-803
[JENSEN and THURSBY, 2001]
R. JENSEN, M.C. THURSBY.
“Proofs and prototypes for sales: The licensing of University Investors”.
American Economic Review, 91 (2001), pp. 240-259
[JENSEN et al., 2001]
R. JENSEN, J.G. THURSBY, M.C. THURSBY.
“Objectives, characteristics and outcomes of university licensing: A survey of major U.S. universities”.
Journal of Technology Transfer, 26 (2001), pp. 59-72
[JENSEN et al., 2003]
R. JENSEN, J.G. THURSBY, M.C. THURSBY.
“Disclosure and licensing of university inventions: The best we can do with the s**t we get to work with”.
International Journal of Industrial Organizations, 21 (2003), pp. 1271-1300
[LACH and SCHANKERMAN, 2003]
LACH, S., SCHANKERMAN, M. (2003): “Incentives and invention in universities”. CEPR Discussion Paper 3916.
[LAZEAR, 2004]
E.P. LAZEAR.
“Balanced Skills and Entrepreneurship”.
American Economic Review, 94 (2004), pp. 208-211
[LAZEAR, 2005]
E.P. LAZEAR.
“Entrepreneurship.
Journal of Labor Economics”, 23 (2005), pp. 649-680
[Ley 11/1986, de 20 de Marzo, 1986]
Ley 11/1986, de 20 de Marzo. Ley de Patentes.
BOE del 26 de marzo de, (1986), pp. 11188-11208
[Ley 6/2001, de 21 de Diciembre, 2001]
Ley 6/2001, de 21 de Diciembre. Ley Orgánica de Universidades (L.O.U.).
BOE del 24 de Diciembre de, (2001), pp. 49400-49425
[LOCKETT et al., 2003]
A. LOCKETT, M. WRIGHT, S. FRANKLIN.
“Technology Transfer and Universities’ Spin-out Strategies”.
Small Business Economics, 20 (2003), pp. 185-200
[LOCKETT, et al., 2004]
A. LOCKETT, D. SIEGEL, M. WRIGHT, M.D. ENSLEY.
“The creation of spin-off firms at public research institutions: Managerial and policy implications”.
Research Policy, 34 (2004), pp. 981-993
[MACHO-STADLER et al., 2007]
I. MACHO-STADLER, D. PEREZ-CASTRILLO, R. VEUGELERS.
“Licensing of University Inventions: The role of a Technology Transfer Office”.
International Journal of Industrial Organization, 25 (2007), pp. 483-510
[MACHO-STADLER et al., 2008]
MACHO-STADLER, I., PEREZ-CASTRILLO, D., VEUGELERS, R., (2008). “Designing Contracts for university Spin-offs”. forthcoming in Journal of Economics and Management Strategy.
[MARTÍNEZ, 1995]
J.L. MARTÍNEZ.
“Información y documentación en el Plan Nacional de I+D”.
Boletín de la ANABAD, 45 (1995), pp. 107-143
[MOWERY et al., 2001]
D. MOWERY, R. NELSON, B. SAMPAT, A. ZIEDONIS.
“The growth of patenting and licensing by US universities: An assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980”.
Research Policy, 30 (2001), pp. 99-119
[MOWERY, 2005]
D.C. MOWERY.
“The Bayh-Dole Act and High-Technology Entrepreneurship in U.S. Universities: Chicken, Egg, Or something Else?”.
University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfers, pp. 38-68
[MURRAY, 2004]
F. MURRAY.
“The role of Academic Inventor in entrepreneurial firms: Sharing the Laboratory Life”.
Research Policy, 33 (2004), pp. 643-659
[NDONZUAU, et al., 2002]
F.N. NDONZUAU, F. PIRNAY, S. SURLEMONT.
“A stage model of academic spin-off creation”.
Technovation, 22 (2002), pp. 281-289
[NELSON, 2001]
R. NELSON.
“Observations on the Post-Bayh-Dole rise in patenting at American universities”.
The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26 (2001), pp. 13-19
[PÉREZ-PÉREZ and MARTINEZ-SÁNCHEZ, 2003]
M. PÉREZ-PÉREZ, A. MARTINEZ-SÁNCHEZ.
“The Development of University Spin offs: Early Dynamics of Technology Transfer and Networking”.
Technovation, 23 (2003), pp. 823-834
[SHANE and STUART, 2002]
S. SHANE, T. STUART.
“Organisational Endowment and Performance of University Start up”.
Management Science, 48 (2002), pp. 154-170
[SHANE, 2002]
S. SHANE.
“Selling University Technology: Patterns from MIT”.
Management Science, 48 (2002), pp. 122-137
[SIEGEL et al., 2003]
D. SIEGEL, D. WALDMAN, A. LINK.
“Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of University Technology Transfer offices: An exploratory study”.
Research Policy, 32 (2003), pp. 27-48
[SIEGEL and PHAN, 2006]
D. SIEGEL, P.H. PHAN.
“The Effectiveness of University Technology Transfer: Lessons Learned from Quantitative and Qualitative Research in the U.S. and the U.K.”.
[VOHORA et al., 2004]
A. VOHORA, M. WRIGHT, A. LOCKETT.
Critical Junctures in the development of university high-tech spin-out companies.
Research Policy, 33 (2004), pp. 147-175
Copyright © 2008. Academia Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa
