metricas
covid
Buscar en
Journal of Innovation & Knowledge
Toda la web
Inicio Journal of Innovation & Knowledge Sharing economy benefits and sustainable development goals: Empirical evidence f...
Información de la revista
Vol. 8. Núm. 1.
(enero - marzo 2023)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Visitas
2092
Vol. 8. Núm. 1.
(enero - marzo 2023)
Open Access
Sharing economy benefits and sustainable development goals: Empirical evidence from the transportation industry of Vietnam
Visitas
2092
Muhammad Sadiqa,b, Massoud Moslehpourc,d, Ranfeng Qiud, Vu Minh Hieue,
Autor para correspondencia
hieu.vm@vlu.edu.vn

Corresponding author.
, Khoa Dang Duongf, Thanh Quang Ngog,h
a School of Finance and Accounting, Fuzhou University of International Studies and Trade, P.R. China
b School of Accounting and Finance, Faculty of Business and Law, Taylor's University Malaysia
c Department of Business Administration, Asia University, 500, Lioufeng Rd., Wufeng, Taichung 41354, Taiwan
d Department of Management, California State University, San Bernardino, 5500 University Parkway, San Bernardino, CA 92407
e Faculty of Business Administration, Van Lang University, 69/68 Dang Thuy Tram Street, Ward 13, Binh Thanh District, Ho Chi Minh city, Vietnam
f Vo Truong Toan University, Vietnam, Highway 1A, Tan Phu Thanh, Chau Thanh A, Hau Giang Province, Vietnam
g School of Government, University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City (UEH), Ho Chi Minh City 72407, Vietnam
h Research Group Public Governance and Developmental Issues, University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City (UEH), Ho Chi Minh City 72407, Vietnam
Este artículo ha recibido

Under a Creative Commons license
Información del artículo
Resumen
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Figuras (2)
Suplemento especial
Este artículo forma parte de:
Achieving Sustainable Development and Energy Efficiency through Sharing Economy

Editado por: Marcin W. Staniewski

Más datos
Abstract

Sustainable development goals (SDGs) are the foremost requirement of the entire world, and a sharing economy is potentially the best way to achieve them, a phenomenon which needs to be emphasized. This study empirically investigates the impact of the environmental, social and economic benefits of a sharing economy on SDG achievement, along with the mediating impact of innovative culture on the association between these benefits of a sharing economy and SDG achievement. This study gathered primary data from sample of employees of transportation industry of Vietnam. The study employs PLS-SEM using Smart-PLS to analyse the association among the constructs. The findings show that the social and economic benefits positively and significantly relate to SDGs achievement. Additionally, the findings also indicate that in the presence of innovative culture as a mediator, the determinants of sharing economy benefits are significantly correlated with sustainable development goals. This study provides guidelines for regulators formulating regulations related to SDG achievement through a sharing economy.

Keywords:
Sharing economy
Social benefits
Environmental benefits
Economic benefits: SDG achievement
JEL codes:
Q01
Q56
I31
Texto completo
Introduction

The pressure on natural resources, such as soil, has increased with the expanding population and economic practice. Many social and environmental problems persist which can destroy the future growth of economies. Undoubtedly, many individuals and enterprises make efforts to remove social and economic issues and improve the situation, but these efforts are often unsatisfactory. Social, environmental, and economic development are a major concern for many scholars and reformers hoping to achieve sustainable development goals (SDGs) (Chien et al., 2022; Galkina & Sorokin, 2020; Xueying et al., 2021). Various policies show increasing environmental and social awareness, and campaigns are being carried out for social and environmental wellbeing as well as financial development. The presentation of the United Nations (UN) 17 SDGs is the outcome of environmental and social awareness among people worldwide and state initiatives in this regard.

The 17 SDGs represent humanity's most ambitious goals for the future. In September 2015, 193 countries agreed on these goals, and 169 sub-goals, which must be achieved by 2030 under the 2030 Agenda at the UN General Assembly, (Chien et al., 2021a; Vasylieva, Lyulyov, Bilan, & Streimikiene, 2019; Xiang et al., 2021). The SDGs are international guidelines that the global community must follow to address global challenges. They are designed to ensure that people can live in full dignity, peace and prosperity for future generations by better maintaining the natural world and life on the planet. The goals operate in three areas: social development, environmental development, and financial development, with consideration for the people, the planet, peace, prosperity and collaboration (Chien et al., 2021b; Kutan, Paramati, Ummalla, & Zakari, 2018; Tan et al., 2021).

The sharing economy is an economic concept that involves the practice of buying, providing or sharing access to goods and services between individuals or businesses, and sharing ideas, techniques, processes and information (Chien et al., 2021c; Çiftçioğlu & Sokhanvar, 2021; Ehsanullah et al., 2021; Sadiq et al., 2021c). The primary goal the sharing economy is to minimize the consumption of resources and services used to perform company operations, while achieving maximum outcomes. The undertaking of sharing economy practices contributes to the three types of SDGs, with many social benefits (increased social wellbeing of the stakeholders), environmental benefits (reduced negative environmental impacts of business practices) and economic benefits (reduced total costs, enhanced marketing and increased profits) (Zygmunt, 2020).

Vietnam is becoming established as a major manufacturer. The country's goal is to become an export-driven economy. The rapid increase in goods transportation has forced the expansion of the country's logistics business for manufacturing. The logistics industry saw a 12 per cent rise in 2018. According to the World Bank, the country is placed 39th out of 139, up 25 positions from 2016. In the first quarter of 2020, Vietnam's economic income hit $390 billion. Within two years, the industry rose from 53rd to 48th place (Cheba et al., 2020). Although this ranking began to decline over the next two years, Vietnam eventually hit 64th, with a quickly improving trend over the following two years, by the end of 2018, Vietnam was ranked 39th, demonstrating the importance of the industry. The logistics business contributes to the growth of the Vietnamese economy in a variety of ways (Bierwiaczonek et al., 2020). Despite a mixed contribution of the logistics industry to the GDP, with the overall contribution in 2015 being 2.73 per cent, dropping to 2.68 per cent the following year, followed by a 2.70 per cent increase in 2017, the industry continued to develop, generating 2.78 per cent of the country's GDP. Despite the recent worldwide epidemic, the industry makes up 2.48 per cent of the GDP (Richterová et al., 2021). These tendencies compel academics to investigate this sector. The transportation industry's contribution to Vietnam's GDP is given in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Contribution of the transport industry to Vietnam's GDP

(0.29MB).

The present study addresses some gaps that exist in the literature: (1) despite being an essential topic, research into the sharing economy and sustainable development has not reached its peak; (2) Lai, Chuang, Zhang and Nepal (2020), investigate the nexus between a sharing economy, sustainable development, and social responsibility, whereas the present study tests the relationship between a sharing economy and sustainable development by adding: (a) the moderating factor of innovative culture; (b) the sharing economy factors of economic, social and environmental benefits; and (c) a Vietnam perspective; 2) Karobliene and Pilinkiene (2021) test the sharing economy and sustainable development in the context of European Union countries whereas this study tests the model from a Vietnam perspective, adding the moderation effect of innovative culture; 3) Govindan, Shankar, and Kannan (2020), test sustainable goal achievement through a sharing economy from an Indian perspective, whereas this study adds the moderating effect and selects Vietnam's transportation sector; and 4) from a Vietnam perspective, there is less evidence regarding the relationship with the moderating effect of innovative culture.

The significance of the study is: 1) it highlights the importance of a sharing economy to achieving SDGs; 2) it helps professionals refine their policies for the best utilization of resources to achieve the goals of their organisations; and 3) it helps researchers identify the importance of a sharing economy for any economy or business. The structure of the study has several phases. The first phase is the introduction. The second deals with evidence regarding economic, social, and environmental sharing economy benefits, innovative culture and the achievement of SD goals from preceding literature. The third phase concerns the methodology applied, data collection, analysis, and validity. The fourth phase compares the study results to the findings of other authors and thus approves the results. The paper ends with the study's implications, conclusions, and future recommendations.

Theoretical background

The sharing economy is a phenomenon that supports sustainable economic activity. It combines information technology and management methods to develop a new culture in which resources are used more efficiently. As a result, it provides an innovative framework that may pave the way for long-term economic development and energy efficiency. The sharing economy offers a route to long-term development based on resource efficiency and stronger social links. This strengthens non-profit links and has an empowering influence on communities (Ciulli & Kolk, 2019; Huang, Sadiq & Chien, 2021a; Zhao et al., 2021). As noted in the literature, the emergence of the sharing economy has been received with enormous enthusiasm, owing to its potential to improve outcomes and lead to a more equitable and sustainable economy. It has changed the old manner of doing things, resulting in a new culture of sharing and transacting in digital spaces. The potential benefits include more efficient resource use, which leads to less overproduction and resource exploitation (Acquier, Daudigeos, & Pinkse, 2017; Huang, Sadiq & Chien, 2021b; Mahmood et al., 2021). One characteristic of the digital economy is the rise of the sharing economy in company models. In the intensely developed theory of the sharing economy, the topic of sustainable development is of special importance. To study the link between the sharing economy and sustainable development, methodological techniques need to be investigated. Economic models that allow for a quantitative assessment of the sharing economy's influence on achieving SDGs must be improved (Casado-Diaz, Casado-Díaz, & Hoogendoorn, 2020; Flores & Chang, 2020; Huang, Chien & Sadiq, 2021c).

Having a sharing economy means sharing economic resources. When resources are shared, there are many pros and cons. Economic activity is key to the achievement of development goals. In this context, van Zanten and van Tulder (2021) and Tabeikyna et al. (2021) explore the impact of economic activity on SDGs. A systematic review of 876 papers focused on agriculture, industry, and manufacturing, concludes that economic activity positively influences SDGs. Both Lyaskovskaya and Khudyakova (2021a) and Pérez-Pérez, Benito-Osorio, García-Moreno, and Martínez-Fernández (2021), explore the nexus between the sharing economy and SDGs, and reveal a positive association between them. Hao, Zhang, and Wei (2022) examine the impacts of the economic benefits of a sharing economy on financial flexibility and sustainable economic development through sustainable innovation. The China A-share market serves as the context for the analysis, and the data covers the period 2007 to 2019. A sustainable innovation model shows a positive relation between the economic benefits of a sharing economy and SDGs, as they enhance financial flexibility and sustainable innovation. Thus, the first hypothesis is derived:

  • H1: There is a positive association between the economic benefits of a sharing economy and SDG achievement.

The sharing economy is a new phenomenon that has received a lot of attention over the last five years and has the potential to transform how individuals and businesses interact. It is built on the concept of shared consumption and the monetization of spare capacity. Participating in the sharing economy has several benefits. The sharing economy is a social and economic movement that encourages people to share their leftover resources with others, reducing waste, and eventually leading to a greater degree of shared interest in society. Significant economic and social benefits can only be realized if the sharing economy is employed in a consistent and long-term manner (Apostoaie and Bilan, 2020). The idea of sustainable or continuous use differs from first-time use and is concerned with a person's user behaviour and engagement with systems over a longer time than the initial use behaviour. Sustainable use behaviour refers to the extension of an original usage and is an important component to consider when evaluating the advantages of the sharing economy(Méndez-Picazo et al., 2021). As a result, it is critical to represent and identify the elements that influence people's willingness to engage in sustainable purchasing via the sharing economy. In this context, Boateng, Kosiba, and Okoe (2019) and Heinrich, Blauuw & Pretorius (2020) explore the relationship between sharing economic factors and environmental and sustainable development. A review of 74 papers on the sharing economy and SDGs concludes that there is a positive association between sharing social and economic factors and SDGs. Gössling and Michael Hall (2019) and Wei et al. (2021) explore the nexus of a collaborative economy with SDGs in the tourism industry, conceptualizing the impact of the sharing economy on SDGs and concluding that the sharing economy impacts SDGs. Govindan et al. (2020) investigate the relationship between the achievement of SDGs by a sharing economy of SMEs in India. The study identifies 15 common barriers, including a lack of control, trust, and capital cost, which affect the achievement of SDGs. Among the most influential is capital cost. The costs associated with any project are key to the project's success. The economic benefits pivot towards achieving any related financial objective. Furthermore, Fuster Morell, Espelt, and Renau Cano (2020) and Koloba (2020), explore the nexus between the sharing economy and SDGs. Analysis of the data on 60 platforms reveals that the sharing economy impacts SDGs. In this context, Sapena, Almenar, Apetrei, Escrivá, and Gil (2018) and Sadiq et al. (2021b), investigate the sharing economy from a social perspective, i.e., poverty eradication and its impacts on SDGs, and show that a sharing economy reduces costs, enhances employment opportunities and thus, provides a source of poverty eradication, which is a SDG. Therefore, the second hypothesis is derived:

  • H2: There is a positive association between the social benefits of a sharing economy and SDG achievement.

The sharing economy is a fascinating phenomenon, in which people are increasingly granting each other access to existing resources (Bilan, Hussain, Haseeb, & Kot, 2020; Sharma, 2020). As a result, society's resources are being used more efficiently, encouraging a shift to a more sustainable form of consumption. Sustainable consumption has a common environmental effect, allowing human needs to be addressed, now and in the future. The environment is one of the key factors in the betterment of any country's life and economy. The UN SDGs are universally agreed-upon goals to eradicate poverty, safeguard the planet's natural resources, and ensure that all people live in peace and prosperity (Piligrimienė et al., 2021). The SDGs incorporate the three elements of sustainable development, economic, environmental, and social, apply to high-income and low-income nations, and include accountability measures. Firstly, a systems approach to future-proof health and social justice is required. Secondly, a research-based strategy must be implemented for improving communication, framing, and engagement. Thirdly, actions should have co-benefits (i.e., both immediate and long-term benefits to health, equity, and prosperity). The SDGs give public health professionals a critical chance to help society build the circumstances for a brighter future through concerted effort (Allen, Metternicht, & Wiedmann, 2017; Dong, Liu, & Bian, 2021; Kikulwe & Asindu, 2020; Li et al., 2021).

The UN has five environment-related goals: clean and water sanitation (SG # 6); affordable and clean energy (SG # 7); decent work and economic growth (SG # 8); responsible consumption and production (SG # 12); and life on land (SG # 15). In this context, Schroeder, Anggraeni, and Weber (2019) and Liu et al. (2021a) explore the nexus between the sharing economy and the environment-related UN SDGs. The results reveal that the sharing economy influences sustainable development and environment-related goals. The circular economy (CE) concept provides an innovative and systematic method to address various urban sustainability concerns by examining synergistic approaches to constructing circular urban systems and optimizing cities' material and energy metabolisms to reduce their environmental footprints. The SDGs published by the UN highlight urban sustainability as a significant issue, and a circular economy might offer a variety of ways to achieve SDGs in an urban context. As a trade-off, the circular economy may have negative consequences for the business-as-usual scenario, which are often overlooked. Dong et al. (2021) explore the nexus between a sharing economy and sustainable development in rural areas. The results reveal that the sharing economy impacts rural sustainability. One major threat to the environment is a lack of proper waste management. This has become a global issue and needs special attention. Dabbous and Tarhini (2021) and Dlalisa & Govender (2020) apply empirical research to the environmental benefits of a sharing economy on energy efficiency and sustainable economic development. A sample of 18 OECD countries, and data on the sharing economy, energy efficiency, and sustainable economic development from 2014 to 2018, show a positive association of the sharing economy with energy efficiency and sustainable economic development. The incorporation of a sharing economy reduces energy use without reducing productivity. The reduced use of energy contributes to the achievement of SDGs. Thus, the third hypothesis is derived:

  • H3: There is a positive association between the environmental benefits of a sharing economy and SDG achievement.

The world is seeing rapid technological change, which impacts every aspect of life. This change is the outcome of innovation, the basis for which is research and development, which requires strong support from organizations and nations. Developing countries are less focused on innovation culture, which plays a pivotal role in developing innovation, and this is considered one of the main differences between developed and developing countries (Al Mamun, Muniady, & Nasir, 2021; Al-Omoush, Simón-Moya, & Sendra-García, 2020). Governments and international organizations recognize the potential of science, technology, and innovation to facilitate and accelerate progress toward SDGs. To exploit the benefits, governmental policies and investments must be re-aligned and streamlined. Innovation does impact the achievement of SDGs and, in this context, Cordova and Celone (2019) explore the nexus between innovation and sustainable development goals from a business perspective. The results reveal that different business stakeholders respond in different ways to SDGs. Innovation acts as a driver toward achieving SDGs. Aibar-Guzmán, García-Sánchez, Aibar-Guzmán, and Hussain (2022) investigate the relationship between the sharing economy, innovative culture, and SDGs, revealing that, when there is an innovative culture, there is a tendency to adopt a sharing economy, which helps achieve SDGs. Michal, Mariana, and Paul (2019) test innovation-oriented policy from a sustainable development goals perspective. The results reveal that policy roadmaps can increase innovation policy coherence and establish synergies between public, commercial, and civil society activities and investments in high-impact mission-oriented technologies for sustainable development. Muñoz-La Rivera, Hermosilla, Delgadillo, and Echeverría (2020) and Othman, Nordin, and Sadiq (2020), explore SDGs from an innovative skills point of view in industry 4.0. The results reveal that employees’ innovative skills impact the achievement of firms’ SDGs. The present study views the sharing economy from an innovative cultural point of view. Liu, Feng, and Wang (2019) and Sadiq et al. (2021a) explore product innovation from a sharing economy perspective. The results reveal that a sharing economy influences innovative products in the market, as we live in a digital world. This digitalization has changed the concept of business across the world, as the sharing economy is about the privatization of economic resources. The best use of resources depends on the availability of the most advanced tool due to innovation. In this context, Shaikh, Sharma, and Karjaluoto (2020) explore digital innovation and the sharing economy, revealing that the existence of digital innovation supports the sharing economy. Ljungholm (2018) also explores the sharing economy, economic growth, and innovation, and reveals an association between the sharing economy and innovation. Shereni (2019) explores the sharing economy and SDGs in developing countries. Thus, the following hypotheses are derived:

  • H4: The relationship of economic benefits of a sharing economy and SDG achievement is mediated by innovative culture.

  • H5: The relationship of social benefits of a sharing economy and SDG achievement is mediated by innovative culture.

  • H6: The relationship of environmental benefits of a sharing economy and SDG achievement is mediated by innovative culture.

The current article applies social exchange theory, from which the framework is developed. Social exchange theory describes the social behaviour of collaboration between parties by implementing a cost-benefit analysis to determine the risks and benefits (Cropanzano, Anthony, Daniels, & Hall, 2017; Moslehpour et al.,2022b). The theory shows that, when people or organizations interact with each other, they exchange resources to reduce costs (Liu et al., 2021b; Moslehpour et al., 2022a; Wang, Xiang, Yang, & Ma, 2019). This study examines the impact of sharing economy benefits on SDG achievement using social exchange theory. Most previous articles also use social exchange theory to examine the benefits of a sharing economy to attain specific goals. For example, Lai et al. (2020) use social exchange theory to predict the sharing economy's benefits for organizational success, and Boateng et al. (2019) examine the sharing economy's role in achieving organizational goals using social exchange theory to develop their framework. This study uses social exchange theory to examine the impact of the benefits of a sharing economy for the achievement of SDGs, and develops its framework accordingly, given in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Theoretical framework

(0.09MB).
Research methods

This research investigates the impact of the economic benefits, social benefits, and environmental benefits of the sharing economy on SDG achievement and examines the mediating impact of innovative culture on the links between these economic, social, and environmental benefits and SDG achievement in the transportation industry in Vietnam. It employs the primary data collection method of questionnaires to gather data from selected employees. Transportation industry employees currently operating in Vietnam are the selected respondents. The researchers use purposive sampling to select the respondents, and only those employees related to SDG activities are selected. The researchers apply mail and personal visit methods to distribute surveys to the employees. The researchers sent out 535 surveys, and 290 were received and used for analysis, a 54.21 per cent response rate. The research uses three predictors: economic benefits of a sharing economy (EBSE); social benefits of a sharing economy (SBSE); and environmental benefits of a sharing economy (ENBSE), in addition to one mediation variable, innovative culture (IC), and one predictive variable, SDG achievement (SDGA). The measurement scales for the constructs under study are extracted from previous studies.

The measurement scale for SDG achievement is taken from Zamora-Polo, Sánchez-Martín, Corrales-Serrano, and Espejo-Antúnez (2019) and has 17 items, given Table 1, below.

Table 1.

Measures of SDG achievement

Construct  Item  Statement  Source 
SDG Achievement  SDGA1  “My organization takes part in poverty reduction.”  (Zamora-Polo et al., 2019
  SDGA2  “My organization plays a significant role in hunger reduction.”   
  SDGA3  “My organization is working for healthcare and wellness.”   
  SDGA4  “My company provides quality education to their employees and employees’ families.”   
  SDGA5  “My firm always works for gender equality.”   
  SDGA6  “I have access to clean water and sewerage.”   
  SDGA7  “My firm uses accessible and non-polluting energy.”   
  SDGA8  “My firm takes part in decent work and economic growth.”   
  SDGA9  “My firm has innovation and effective infrastructure.”   
  SDGA10  “My firm always works to reduce inequalities.”   
  SDGA11  “My firm is creating sustainable cities and communities.”   
  SDGA12  “My firm has the ability for responsible consumption and production.”   
  SDGA13  “My organization always considers weather care.”   
  SDGA14  “My firm always cares about underwater life.”   
  SDGA15  “My firm always cares for life in terrestrial ecosystems.”   
  SDGA16  “My firm participates in peacebuilding, justice, and corruption-free institutions.”   
  SDGA17  “My organization strives to build alliances to achieve the above goals.”   

Instrument for innovative culture is adapted from Khan, Hussain, Maqbool, Ali, and Numan (2019), and has eight items, given in Table 2, below.

Table 2.

Measures of innovative culture

Construct  Item  Statement  Source 
Innovative Culture  IC1  “My organization's culture is challenging.”  (Khan et al., 2019
  IC2  “My organization's culture is creative.”   
  IC3  “My organization's culture is enterprising.   
  IC4  “My organization's culture is stimulating.”   
  IC5  “My organization's culture is driving.”   
  IC6  “My organization's culture is risk-taking.”   
  IC7  “My organization's culture is results-oriented.”   
  IC8  “My organization's culture is pressurized.”   

The measures of the economic benefits of a sharing economy are taken from Jelinkova, Tetrevova, Vavra, and Munzarova (2021) and have four items, given in Table 3.

Table 3.

Measures of the economic benefits of a sharing economy

Construct  Item  Statement  Source 
Economic Benefits of Sharing Economy  EBSE1  “The sharing economy is beneficial to the economy of the country.”  (Jelinkova et al., 2021
  EBSE2  “The sharing economy is a way to ensure more efficient utilization of resources.”   
  EBSE3  “Use of services in the sharing economy saves users a significant amount of money.”   
  EBSE4  “The sharing economy may be an interesting source of income for providers of assets.”   

The social benefits of a sharing economy are taken from Jelinkova et al. (2021) with four items, shown in Table 4.

Table 4.

Measures of the social benefits of a sharing economy

Construct  Item  Statement  Source 
Social Benefits of Sharing Economy  SBSE1  “The sharing economy contributes to a greater level of employment and creates new jobs.”  (Jelinkova et al., 2021
  SBSE2  “Participation in the sharing economy simplifies work-life balance.”   
  SBSE3  “Use of services in the sharing economy is a source of unusual experiences.”   
  SBSE4  “Sharing via platforms saves users’ time.”   

Finally, the environmental benefits of a sharing economy are taken from Jelinkova et al. (2021) with two items, given in Table 5.

Table 5.

Measures of the environmental benefits of a sharing economy

Construct  Items  Statements  Source 
Environmental Benefits of Sharing Economy  ENBSE1  “Sharing is environmentally friendly thanks to saving resources.”  (Jelinkova et al., 2021
  ENBSE2  “Sharing limits the production of waste.”   

The research applies PLS-SEM using Smart-PLS to analyse the links among the constructs. Smart-PLS is an effective statistical tool that works with large sample sizes and complex frameworks (Hair et al., 2021; Moslehpour et al., 2021). The framework of the study is given in Figure 2, below.

Results

The study examines the content validity, using factor loading. The results show factor loading values bigger than 0.50, indicating content validity. The convergent validity is tested using average variance extracted (AVE). The results show AVE values bigger than 0.50, indicating convergent validity. The composite reliability (CR) is tested using Cronbach's alpha. The results show alpha values bigger than 0.70, indicating significant reliability. Table 6 shows these findings.

Table 6.

Validity (Convergent)

  Item  Loading  Cronbach  CR  AVE 
Economic Benefits of Sharing Economy  EBSE4  0.878  0.880  0.917  0.735 
  EBSE1  0.867       
  EBSE2  0.844       
  EBSE3  0.839       
Environmental Benefits of Sharing Economy  ENBSE1  0.971  0.779  0.885  0.795 
  ENBSE2  0.804       
Innovative Culture  IC1  0.802  0.920  0.935  0.642 
  IC2  0.784       
  IC3  0.837       
  IC4  0.811       
  IC5  0.832       
  IC6  0.819       
  IC7  0.793       
  IC8  0.729       
Social Benefits of Sharing Economy  SBSE1  0.967  0.955  0.968  0.882 
  SBSE2  0.921       
  SBSE3  0.903       
  SBSE4  0.964       
SDG Achievement  SDGA10  0.773  0.936  0.941  0.522 
  SDGA11  0.854       
  SDGA12  0.640       
  SDGA13  0.655       
  SDGA14  0.621       
  SDGA15  0.666       
  SDGA16  0.641       
  SDGA17  0.710       
  SDGA2  0.672       
  SDGA3  0.471       
  SDGA4  0.673       
  SDGA5  0.857       
  SDGA6  0.776       
  SDGA8  0.857       
  SDGA9  0.854       

The discriminant validity is tested using the Fornell Larcker criterion. The results show that the first value, the linkage with the construct itself, is larger than the other values in the column, the linkages with other constructs. These results show discriminant validity and low linkages among the variables, presented in Table 7.

Table 7.

Fornell Larcker validity

  EBSE  ENBSE  IC  SBSE  SDGA 
EBSE  0.857         
ENBSE  0.165  0.891       
IC  0.435  0.178  0.801     
SBSE  0.427  0.347  0.481  0.939   
SDGA  0.459  0.218  0.517  0.549  0.723 

The discriminant validity is tested using cross-loading. The results show that the values representing the linkage with the construct itself are larger than the other values in the rows, which represent the linkages with other constructs, showing discriminant validity and low linkages among the variables, presented in Table 8.

Table 8.

Cross-loadings

  EBSE  ENBSE  IC  SBSE  SDGA 
EBSE4  0.878  0.165  0.394  0.392  0.453 
EBSE1  0.867  0.138  0.368  0.343  0.365 
EBSE2  0.844  0.126  0.406  0.379  0.385 
EBSE3  0.839  0.134  0.315  0.344  0.360 
ENBSE1  0.163  0.971  0.208  0.331  0.235 
ENBSE2  0.125  0.804  0.056  0.293  0.118 
IC1  0.352  0.137  0.802  0.389  0.635 
IC2  0.340  0.179  0.784  0.379  0.638 
IC3  0.375  0.104  0.837  0.350  0.646 
IC4  0.350  0.072  0.811  0.317  0.588 
IC5  0.350  0.154  0.832  0.407  0.728 
IC6  0.331  0.206  0.819  0.440  0.743 
IC7  0.363  0.144  0.793  0.455  0.699 
IC8  0.332  0.129  0.729  0.317  0.515 
SBSE1  0.418  0.323  0.456  0.967  0.508 
SBSE2  0.370  0.316  0.437  0.921  0.525 
SBSE3  0.400  0.342  0.458  0.903  0.513 
SBSE4  0.414  0.321  0.454  0.964  0.514 
SDGA10  0.396  0.140  0.781  0.442  0.773 
SDGA11  0.333  0.176  0.782  0.454  0.854 
SDGA12  0.326  0.171  0.433  0.404  0.640 
SDGA13  0.317  0.141  0.371  0.307  0.655 
SDGA14  0.343  0.131  0.375  0.330  0.621 
SDGA15  0.340  0.157  0.413  0.334  0.666 
SDGA16  0.315  0.163  0.362  0.307  0.641 
SDGA17  0.330  0.140  0.455  0.393  0.710 
SDGA2  0.356  0.185  0.411  0.345  0.672 
SDGA3  0.239  0.178  0.247  0.344  0.471 
SDGA4  0.351  0.135  0.464  0.429  0.673 
SDGA5  0.332  0.182  0.786  0.456  0.857 
SDGA6  0.394  0.149  0.780  0.440  0.776 
SDGA8  0.333  0.180  0.775  0.459  0.857 
SDGA9  0.336  0.186  0.794  0.457  0.854 

The discriminant validity is tested using the heterotrait monotrait (HTMT) ratio. The results show values not bigger than 0.90, indicating discriminant validity and low linkages among variables, presented in Table 9.

Table 9.

Heterotrait monotrait ratio

  EBSE  ENBSE  IC  SBSE  SDGA 
EBSE           
ENBSE  0.191         
IC  0.481  0.175       
SBSE  0.463  0.400  0.508     
SDGA  0.507  0.232  0.808  0.573   

The results reveal that the economic benefits and social benefits of a sharing economy have positive and significant links with SDG achievement in the transportation industry in Vietnam, thus H1 and H2 are accepted. However, the environmental benefits of a sharing economy is not significantly correlated with SDG achievement in the transportation industry in Vietnam, hence H3 is rejected. The findings reveal that the relation of economic benefits of a sharing economy, the social benefits of a sharing economy and SDG achievement in the transportation industry in Vietnam is mediated by innovative culture, hence H4 and H5 are accepted. In contrast, innovative culture insignificantly mediates the link between the environmental benefits of a sharing economy and SDG achievement in the transportation industry in Vietnam, hence H6 is rejected. Table 10 shows these findings.

Table 10.

Path analysis

Relationship  Coeff  S.D.  t-Stats  P Value  L.L  U.L 
EBSE -> SDGA  0.079  0.042  1.854  0.033  0.002  0.133 
ENBSE -> SDGA  0.021  0.033  0.643  0.261  -0.033  0.078 
IC -> SDGA  0.695  0.035  19.903  0.000  0.638  0.757 
SBSE -> SDGA  0.173  0.052  3.300  0.001  0.071  0.253 
EBSE -> IC -> SDGA  0.195  0.048  4.088  0.000  0.118  0.287 
SBSE -> IC -> SDGA  0.249  0.045  5.522  0.000  0.174  0.310 
ENBSE -> IC -> SDGA  0.005  0.032  0.154  0.439  -0.043  0.067 
ConclusionDiscussion

The results reveal that the economic benefits of a sharing economy positively impact the achievement of SDGs. This implies that traditional energy resources are minimized in an energy-efficient economy, and cheaper energy resources are used. These low-cost energy resources save money and allow the economy to move towards economic growth, a source of social development. These results agree with Boar, Bastida, and Marimon (2020), that struggles to use the least amount of energy to maintain the work environment, by applying energy-efficient practices such as sealing cracks or using insulation, save about 10 per cent of the costs of heating or cooling, and that using sunshine for lighting and shades save running costs. These cost reductions improve business profitability and motivate the achievement of SDGs, representing a positive relationship between the economic benefits of a sharing economy and the achievement of SDGs. The results also align with Gössling and Hall (2019), who show that innovative processes or technologies which require expert personnel increase energy efficiency, firstly by increasing jobs opportunities, thereby reducing poverty and hunger, and secondly, by enhancing capital formation and addressing SDGs.

The results reveal that the social benefits of a sharing economy positively impact the achievement of SDGs. This means that the energy efficiency adoption has many social benefits, and the SDGs based on social wellbeing are made easier, sustaining development. These results confirms the empirical shreds of Lucas et al. (2021), who examine sharing economy benefits from a social perspective and their role in achieving SDGs. The adoption of energy efficiency improves the quality of life by reducing health risks, securing resources, increasing jobs, reducing poverty, and enhancing employment, all of which enhance sustainability and development. The positive relationship between the social benefits of a sharing economy and SDG achievement also support the findings of Chen, Cheng, Edwards, and Xu (2020), that energy efficiency has social benefits such as encouraging renewable energy from food and non-food crops and forests, promoting agriculture. Agricultural growth enhances the environment, provides raw materials and other resources, and helps achieve SDGs. The results also agree with Labbate et al. (2021), who analyse the role of the social benefits of a sharing economy in addressing SDGs. In countries where businesses follow regulations for energy efficiency, harmful gas emissions are minimal, and there is a clean environment for human beings where they can breathe easily and have healthy and nutritious food. The improved living of people indicates the achievement of SDGs.

The results reveal that the environmental benefits of a sharing economy have a positive but insignificant impact on SDG achievement. In Vietnam, energy efficiency is not effectively implemented and provides only weak environmental benefits. The low level of benefits weakens the country's ability to achieve SDGs, especially those based on environmental development. Therefore, the firms engaged in sharing economy practices must focus on its impacts on environmental quality so that SDGs can be achieved. The result of an insignificant positive relationship between the environmental benefits of a sharing economy and the achievement of SDGs is also presented by Lyaskovskaya and Khudyakova (2021b). They also find an insignificant relationship based on the idea that energy efficiency has many environmental benefits, which could help the country address SDGs. However, if entities fail to implement energy efficiency and attain environmental benefits effectively, it becomes difficult to achieve SDGs. This suggests that firms and individuals must implement a sharing economy and attain its environmental benefits and achieve SDGs.

The findings shows that economic benefits of sharing economy and SDG achievement both are related indirectly in the presence of innovation culture as a mediator. . This is supported by Boateng et al. (2019). When firms adopt sharing economy policies, reducing expenditure and removing the adverse impacts of energy consumption, the financial resources saved can bring innovation to the firms’ cultures as they adopt research and development practices and develop creativity in human resources. An innovative culture improves firms’ management and ability to address and achieve SDGs. So, innovative culture has a mediating effect on the relationship between the economic benefits of a sharing economy and SDG achievement. These results are in line with van Niekerk (2020), who shows that to adopt innovation, firms need resources, technologies, techniques, and information to enhance their innovative culture. The acquisition of these resources, technologies, information, and techniques is possible through the economic benefits of energy efficiency. When firms develop innovative culture, they can achieve the SDGs that relate to innovation, work improvement, and economic culture.

The results are similar in the case of social benefits too. This results show consistency with the work Fuster Morell et al. (2020), which show that one of the greatest social benefits of a firm adopting a sharing economy is the achievement of employee commitment, as employees want a clean environment that does not damage their health or that of their loved ones. Committed employees cooperatively develop an innovative culture, which provides a solution to many problems and clears the way for SDG achievement. This study shows innovative culture to be a mediator between the social benefits of a sharing economy and SDG achievement, in agreement with Parmentola, Petrillo, Tutore, and De Felice (2022), who show that an innovative culture is an environment in which employees can present their creative ideas to one another and people above their rank, and get their ideas implemented. Such a culture is developed when employees feel valued due to energy efficiency adoption. As the innovative culture is attained, the employees contribute to the organization's SDGs.

The results show innovative culture to be an insignificant mediator between the environmental benefits of a sharing economy and SDG achievement. Innovative culture links the environmental benefits of energy efficiency and SDG achievement, but this link is vulnerable because the level of energy efficiency has only few and insignificant environmental benefits because of the lack of effectiveness with which energy efficiency is implemented. It is not easy to achieve SDGs if the sharing economy is not implemented effectively and environmental benefits are not fully achieved through innovative culture. These results agree with Kuhzady, Seyfi, and Béal (2020), who also show an insignificant mediating role of innovative culture between the environmental benefits of a sharing economy and SDG achievement.

Implications, limitations & future recommendation

The current study has a great deal of theoretical significance. It is an addition to the sustainability literature addressing SDGs. It analyses the sharing economy's role in achieving SDGs and ensuring sustainable development. The study examines the economic, social, and environmental benefits of a sharing economy and their impact on SDG achievement. While sharing economy benefits for achieving SDGs have previously been addressed collectively, without dividing them into the subheadings of economic, social, and environmental benefits, this study looks deeply into the impacts of the economic, social, and environmental benefits. Innovative organizational culture relates to the economic, social and environmental benefits, and SDGs achievement, as shown by previous literature, but the present study adds to the literature by exploring the mediating role of innovative culture between the economic, social, and environmental benefits of a sharing economy and SDG achievement. The current study has several empirical implications. It is an essential guide for commissions established by governments for addressing SDGs, which must focus on implementing a sharing economy, especially with respect to its economic, social, and environmental benefits. Individual businesses can increase their contribution to SDG achievement, and this study guides regulators formulating regulations relating to SDG achievement through a sharing economy. Firms must effectively implement a sharing economy and gain its economic, social, and environmental benefits, so that an innovative culture comes into existence making it easier to contribute to SDG achievement. Business enterprises in the transportation industry, the focal point of the study, must adopt sharing economy principles to remove the adverse impacts of their activities based on energy consumption. This exploration of the social, economic, and environmental benefits of a sharing economy highlights how, with the incorporation of sharing economy practices, social wellbeing can be achieved, environmental issues can be resolved, the quality of environmental elements such as air, water, and soil can be maintained, the abundance of natural resources can be preserved, and financial resources can be saved. The prosperity of people in various social areas, environmental protection, and financial strength all contribute to countries’ sustainable development.

Vietnam is a lower-middle-income developing country which focuses on the need for sustainable development. Vietnam intends to achieve the SDGs presented by the UN General Assembly by 2030. Sustainable development goals are divided into social, economic, and environmental development, hence social, economic, and environmental practices are required. A sharing economy reduces energy consumption and has several other social, economic, and environmental benefits. This study leads the way to adopting a sharing economy for SDG achievement by examining the influences of sharing economy benefits. The study explores the role of innovative culture in the economic, social, and environmental benefits of a sharing economy and SDGs achievement. Using a survey conducted in Vietnam's transportation industry, the authors analyse sharing economy benefits and SDGs achievement. The findings show a positive relationship between the economic, social, and environmental benefits of a sharing economy and SDG achievement. The findings reveal many economic benefits such as job creation, increased income, affordable energy, reduced operational and production costs, and enhanced profit. The economic benefits of a sharing economy are helpful to achieving SDGs based on economic development. The results reveal that the social benefits of a sharing economy, including improved health, availability of resources, increased employment, and improved environment, are helpful to achieving SDGs. Likewise, if environmental benefits are successfully achieved by a sharing economy, the SDGs relating to environmental development can be achieved. The study concludes that sharing economic benefits, social benefits, and environmental benefits enhances innovative culture and helps achieve SDGs.

The study has some specific limitations, which must be addressed by future research to create a study for practical use. Firstly, this study addresses only the economic benefits, social benefits and environmental benefits of a sharing economy for achieving SDGs, while there are many other significant variables such as human resource management, green finance, eco-innovation, corporate governance, and human capital, which play a significant role in the achievement of SDGs aimed at sustainable development. The researchers suggest that future research covers the impact of these significant factors. Secondly, the study confirms the role of sharing economy benefits in SDGs achievement by the analysis of the practices and SDG contributions of transportation firms in a single country, Vietnam, which limits the study's validity and reliability, because of the limited information about the role of sharing economy benefits in SDG achievement. Future authors could select evidence from multiple countries and industries for better validity and reliability.

Acknowledgment

This research is partly funded by Van Lang University Vietnam. This research is also partly funded by University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City (UEH), Vietnam.

References
[Acquier et al., 2017]
A. Acquier, T. Daudigeos, J. Pinkse.
Promises and paradoxes of the sharing economy: An organizing framework.
Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 125 (2017), pp. 1-10
[Aibar-Guzmán et al., 2022]
B. Aibar-Guzmán, I.-M. García-Sánchez, C. Aibar-Guzmán, N. Hussain.
Sustainable product innovation in agri-food industry: Do ownership structure and capital structure matter?.
Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7 (2022), pp. 100-117
[Allen et al., 2017]
C. Allen, G. Metternicht, T. Wiedmann.
An iterative framework for national scenario modelling for the sustainable development goals (SDGs).
Sustainable Development, 25 (2017), pp. 372-385
[Al Mamun et al., 2021]
A. Al Mamun, R. Muniady, N.A.B.M. Nasir.
Effect of participation in development initiatives on competitive advantages, performance, and sustainability of micro-enterprises in Malaysia.
Contemporary Economics, 15 (2021), pp. 122-138
[Al-Omoush et al., 2020]
K.S. Al-Omoush, V. Simón-Moya, J. Sendra-García.
The impact of social capital and collaborative knowledge creation on e-business proactiveness and organizational agility in responding to the COVID-19 crisis.
Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5 (2020), pp. 279-288
[Apostoaie and Bilan, 2020]
C.M. Apostoaie, I. Bilan.
Macro determinants of shadow banking in Central and Eastern European countries.
Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 33 (2020),
[Bierwiaczonek et al., 2020]
K. Bierwiaczonek, G. Gawron, R. Pyka, M. Suchacka.
Innovation places: theoretical and methodological remarks for analysing metropolitan creativity and innovations.
Creativity Studies, 13 (2020), pp. 532-551
[Bilan et al., 2020]
Y. Bilan, H.I. Hussain, M. Haseeb, S. Kot.
Sustainability and economic performance: Role of organizational learning and innovation.
Engineering Economics, 31 (2020), pp. 93-103
[Boar et al., 2020]
A. Boar, R. Bastida, F. Marimon.
A systematic literature review. Relationships between the sharing economy, sustainability and sustainable development goals.
Sustainability, 12 (2020), pp. 6744-6754
[Boateng et al., 2019]
H. Boateng, J.P.B. Kosiba, A.F. Okoe.
Determinants of consumers’ participation in the sharing economy: A social exchange perspective within an emerging economy context.
International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31 (2019), pp. 718-733
[Casado-Diaz et al., 2020]
M.A. Casado-Diaz, A.B. Casado-Díaz, G. Hoogendoorn.
The home exchange phenomenon in the sharing economy: a research agenda.
Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 20 (2020), pp. 268-285
[Cheba et al., 2020]
K. Cheba, I. Bąk, K. Szopik-Depczyńska.
Sustainable competitiveness as a new economic category–definition and measurement assessment.
Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 26 (2020), pp. 1399-1421
[Chen et al., 2020]
G. Chen, M. Cheng, D. Edwards, L. Xu.
COVID-19 pandemic exposes the vulnerability of the sharing economy: a novel accounting framework.
Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 9 (2020), pp. 1-18
[Chien et al., 2021a]
F. Chien, M. Sadiq, M.A. Nawaz, M.S. Hussain, T.D. Tran, T. Le Thanh.
A step toward reducing air pollution in top Asian economies: The role of green energy, eco-innovation, and environmental taxes.
Journal of environmental management, (2021),
[Chien et al., 2022]
F. Chien, C.C. Hsu, I. Ozturk, A. Sharif, M. Sadiq.
The role of renewable energy and urbanization towards greenhouse gas emission in top Asian countries: Evidence from advance panel estimations.
[Chien et al., 2021b]
F. Chien, Y. Zhang, M. Sadiq, C.C. Hsu.
Financing for energy efficiency solutions to mitigate opportunity cost of coal consumption: An empirical analysis of Chinese industries.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, (2021),
[Chien et al., 2021c]
F. Chien, M. Sadiq, H.W. Kamran, M.A. Nawaz, M.S. Hussain, M. Raza.
Co-movement of energy prices and stock market return: environmental wavelet nexus of COVID-19 pandemic from the USA.
Europe, and China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, (2021),
[Çiftçioğlu and Sokhanvar, 2021]
S. Çiftçioğlu, A. Sokhanvar.
Can specialization in tourism enhance the process of sustainable economic development and investment in East Asia and the Pacific?.
International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Administration, 8 (2021), pp. 1-24
[Ciulli and Kolk, 2019]
F. Ciulli, A. Kolk.
Incumbents and business model innovation for the sharing economy: Implications for sustainability.
Journal of cleaner production, 214 (2019), pp. 995-1010
[Cordova and Celone, 2019]
M.F. Cordova, A. Celone.
SDGs and innovation in the business context literature review.
Sustainability, 11 (2019), pp. 11-28
[Cropanzano et al., 2017]
R. Cropanzano, E.L. Anthony, S.R. Daniels, A.V. Hall.
Social exchange theory: A critical review with theoretical remedies.
Academy of management annals, 11 (2017), pp. 479-516
[Dabbous and Tarhini, 2021]
A. Dabbous, A. Tarhini.
Does sharing economy promote sustainable economic development and energy efficiency? Evidence from OECD countries.
Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 6 (2021), pp. 58-68
[Dlalisa and Govender, 2020]
S.F. Dlalisa, D.W. Govender.
Challenges of acceptance and usage of a learning management system amongst academics.
International Journal Of Ebusiness And Egovernment Studies, 12 (2020), pp. 63-78
[Dong et al., 2021]
L. Dong, Z. Liu, Y. Bian.
Match Circular Economy and Urban Sustainability: Re-investigating Circular Economy Under Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
Circular Economy and Sustainability, 1 (2021), pp. 243-256
[Ehsanullah et al., 2021]
S. Ehsanullah, Q.H. Tran, M. Sadiq, S. Bashir, M. Mohsin, R. Iram.
How energy insecurity leads to energy poverty? Do environmental consideration and climate change concerns matters.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, (2021),
[Flores and Chang, 2020]
A. Flores, V. Chang.
Relación entre la demanda de transporte y el crecimiento económico: Análisis dinámico mediante el uso del modelo ARDL.
Cuadernos de Economía, 43 (2020), pp. 145-163
[Fuster Morell et al., 2020]
M. Fuster Morell, R. Espelt, M. Renau Cano.
Sustainable platform economy: Connections with the sustainable development goals.
Sustainability, 12 (2020), pp. 1-27
[Galkina and Sorokin, 2020]
E. Galkina, A. Sorokin.
Quality management and sustainable economic development.
Russian Engineering Research, 40 (2020), pp. 577-578
[Gössling and Hall, 2019]
S. Gössling, C. Michael Hall.
Sharing versus collaborative economy: how to align ICT developments and the SDGs in tourism?.
Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 27 (2019), pp. 74-96
[Govindan et al., 2020]
K. Govindan, K.M. Shankar, D. Kannan.
Achieving sustainable development goals through identifying and analyzing barriers to industrial sharing economy: A framework development.
International Journal of Production Economics, 227 (2020), pp. 10-29
[Hair et al., 2021]
J.F. Hair, C.B. Astrachan, O.I. Moisescu, L. Radomir, M. Sarstedt, S. Vaithilingam, C.M. Ringle.
Executing and interpreting applications of PLS-SEM: Updates for family business researchers.
Journal of Family Business Strategy, 12 (2021), pp. 1-12
[Hao et al., 2022]
Z. Hao, X. Zhang, J. Wei.
Research on the effect of enterprise financial flexibility on sustainable innovation.
Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7 (2022), pp. 104-119
[Heinrich et al., 2020]
N.E.L. Heinrich, D. Blaauw, A. Pretorius.
Investigating the Hungarian money demand function: Possible implications for monetary policy.
International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies, 12 (2020), pp. 71-87
[Huang et al., 2021a]
S.Z. Huang, M. Sadiq, F. Chien.
The impact of natural resource rent, financial development, and urbanization on carbon emission.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, (2021),
[Huang et al., 2021b]
SZ. Huang, M. Sadiq, F. Chien.
Dynamic nexus between transportation, urbanization, economic growth and environmental pollution in ASEAN countries: does environmental regulations matter?.
Environ Sci Pollut Res, (2021),
[Huang et al., 2021c]
S.Z. Huang, F. Chien, M. Sadiq.
A gateway towards a sustainable environment in emerging countries: the nexus between green energy and human Capital.
Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, (2021),
[Jelinkova et al., 2021]
M. Jelinkova, L. Tetrevova, J. Vavra, S. Munzarova.
The sharing economy in the context of sustainable development and social responsibility: The example of the czech republic.
Sustainability, 13 (2021), pp. 1-18
[Karobliene and Pilinkiene, 2021]
V. Karobliene, V. Pilinkiene.
The sharing economy in the framework of sustainable development goals: Case of European union countries.
Sustainability, 13 (2021), pp. 7-31
[Khan et al., 2019]
S.N. Khan, R.I. Hussain, M.Q. Maqbool, E.I.E. Ali, M. Numan.
The mediating role of innovation between corporate governance and organizational performance: Moderating role of innovative culture in Pakistan textile sector.
Cogent Business & Management, 4 (2019), pp. 1-23
[Kikulwe and Asindu, 2020]
E. Kikulwe, M. Asindu.
Consumer demand and prospects for commercialization of nutritionally enhanced GM bananas in Uganda.
AgBioforum, 22 (2020), pp. 13-24
[Koloba, 2020]
H.A. Koloba.
Purchase Intention Towards Environmentally Friendly Products Among Consumers In South Africa. Applying The Theory Of Planned Behaviour.
International Journal Of Business And Management Studies, 12 (2020), pp. 34-49
[Kuhzady et al., 2020]
S. Kuhzady, S. Seyfi, L. Béal.
Peer-to-peer (P2P) accommodation in the sharing economy: A review.
Current Issues in Tourism, 8 (2020), pp. 1-16
[Kutan et al., 2018]
A.M. Kutan, S.R. Paramati, M. Ummalla, A. Zakari.
Financing renewable energy projects in major emerging market economies: Evidence in the perspective of sustainable economic development.
Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 54 (2018), pp. 1761-1777
[Labbate et al., 2021]
R. Labbate, R.F. Silva, I.S. Rampasso, R. Anholon, O.L.G. Quelhas, W. Leal Filho.
Business models towards SDGs: the barriers for operationalizing Product-Service System (PSS) in Brazil.
International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 28 (2021), pp. 350-359
[Lai et al., 2020]
P.-H. Lai, S.-T. Chuang, M.-C. Zhang, S.K. Nepal.
The non-profit sharing economy from a social exchange theory perspective: A case from World Wide Opportunities on Organic Farms in Taiwan.
Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 28 (2020), pp. 1970-1987
[Li et al., 2021]
W. Li, F. Chien, H.W. Kamran, T., M. Aldeehani, M. Sadiq, V.C. Nguyen, F Taghizadeh-Hesary.
The nexus between COVID-19 fear and stock market volatility.
Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, (2021),
[Liu et al., 2019]
Z. Liu, J. Feng, J. Wang.
Effects of the Sharing Economy on Sequential Innovation Products.
Complexity, (2019), pp. 308-324
[Liu et al., 2021a]
Z. Liu, Y.M. Tang, K.Y. Chau, F. Chien, W. Iqbal, M. Sadiq.
Incorporating strategic petroleum reserve and welfare losses: A way forward for the policy development of crude oil resources in South Asia.
[Liu et al., 2021b]
Z. Liu, J. Lan, F. Chien, M. Sadiq, M.A. Nawaz.
Role of tourism development in environmental degradation: A step towards emission reduction.
Journal of environmental management, (2021),
[Ljungholm, 2018]
D.P. Ljungholm.
Sharing economy, regulatory arbitrage, and urban governance: How city space shapes economic growth and innovation.
Geopolitics, History, and International Relations, 10 (2018), pp. 174-180
[Lucas et al., 2021]
B. Lucas, R.E. Francu, J. Goulding, J. Harvey, G. Nica-Avram, B. Perrat.
A Note on Data-driven Actor-differentiation and SDGs 2 and 12: Insights from a Food-sharing App.
Research Policy, 50 (2021), pp. 1042-1065
[Lyaskovskaya and Khudyakova, 2021a]
E. Lyaskovskaya, T. Khudyakova.
Sharing Economy: For or against Sustainable Development.
Sustainability, 13 (2021), pp. 12-24
[Lyaskovskaya and Khudyakova, 2021b]
E. Lyaskovskaya, T. Khudyakova.
Sharing economy: For or against sustainable development.
Sustainability, 13 (2021), pp. 11056-11073
[Mahmood et al., 2021]
F. Mahmood, F. Qadeer, M. Saleem, H. Han, A. Ariza-Montes.
Corporate social responsibility and firms’ financial performance: A multi-level serial analysis underpinning social identity theory.
Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 34 (2021), pp. 2447-2468
[Méndez-Picazo et al., 2021]
M.T. Méndez-Picazo, M.A. Galindo-Martín, M.S. Castaño-Martínez.
Effects of sociocultural and economic factors on social entrepreneurship and sustainable development.
Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 6 (2021), pp. 69-77
[Michal et al., 2019]
Michal, M., Mariana, M., & Paul, E. (2019). A framework for mission-oriented innovation policy roadmapping for the SDGs: the case of plastic-free oceans. (IIPP WP 2019-03), 45-61. doi: https://doi.org/APO-252636
[Moslehpour et al., 2022]
M. Moslehpour, M.L. Chang, V.K. Pham, A. Dadvari.
Adopting the configurational approach to the analysis of job satisfaction in Mongolia.
European Research on Management and Business Economics, (2022),
[Moslehpour et al., 2022]
M. Moslehpour, A. Al-Fadly, S. Ehsanullah, et al.
Assessing Financial Risk Spillover and Panic Impact of Covid-19 on European and Vietnam Stock market.
Environ Sci Pollut Res, (2022),
[Moslehpour et al., 2021]
M. Moslehpour, T. Ismail, B. Purba, W.K. Wong.
What Makes GO-JEK Go in Indonesia? The Influences of Social Media Marketing Activities on Purchase Intention.
Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 17 (2021), pp. 89-103
[Muñoz-La Rivera et al., 2020]
F. Muñoz-La Rivera, P. Hermosilla, J. Delgadillo, D Echeverría.
The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as a Basis for Innovation Skills for Engineers in the Industry 4.0 Context.
Sustainability, 12 (2020), pp. 15-31
[Othman et al., 2020]
Z. Othman, M.F.F. Nordin, M. Sadiq.
GST fraud prevention to ensure business sustainability: A Malaysian case study.
Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies, 27 (2020), pp. 245-265
[Parmentola et al., 2022]
A. Parmentola, A. Petrillo, I. Tutore, F. De Felice.
Is blockchain able to enhance environmental sustainability? A systematic review and research agenda from the perspective of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
Business Strategy and the Environment, 31 (2022), pp. 194-217
[Pérez-Pérez et al., 2021]
C. Pérez-Pérez, D. Benito-Osorio, S.M. García-Moreno, A. Martínez-Fernández.
Is Sharing a Better Alternative for the Planet? The Contribution of Sharing Economy to Sustainable Development Goals.
Sustainability, 13 (2021), pp. 34-47
[Piligrimienė et al., 2021]
Ž. Piligrimienė, J. Banytė, A. Dovalienė, A. Gadeikienė, H. Korzilius.
Sustainable Consumption Patterns in Different Settings.
Engineering Economics, 32 (2021), pp. 278-291
[Richterová et al., 2021]
E. Richterová, M. Richter, Z. Sojková.
Regional eco-efficiency of the agricultural sector in V4 regions, its dynamics in time and decomposition on the technological and pure technical eco-efficiency change.
Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 16 (2021), pp. 553-576
[Sadiq et al., 2021a]
M. Sadiq, CC. Hsu, Y. Zhang, FS. Chien.
COVID-19 fear and volatility index movements: empirical insights from ASEAN stock markets.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, (2021),
[Sadiq et al., 2021b]
M. Sadiq, S. Nonthapot, O.C. Mohamad, Keong, S. Ehsanullah, N. Iqbal.
Does Green Finance Matters for Sustainable Entrepreneurship and Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility during Covid-19?.
China Finance Review International, (2021),
[Sadiq et al., 2021c]
M. Sadiq, S. Alajlani, M.S. Hussain, R. Ahmad, F. Bashir, S. Chupradit.
Impact of credit, liquidity, and systematic risk on financial structure: comparative investigation from sustainable production.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, (2021),
[Sapena et al., 2018]
J. Sapena, V. Almenar, A. Apetrei, M. Escrivá, M. Gil.
Some reflections on poverty eradication, true development and sustainability within CST.
Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 3 (2018), pp. 90-92
[Schroeder et al., 2019]
P. Schroeder, K. Anggraeni, U. Weber.
The Relevance of Circular Economy Practices to the Sustainable Development Goals.
Journal of Industrial Ecology, 23 (2019), pp. 77-95
[Shaikh et al., 2020]
A.A. Shaikh, R. Sharma, H. Karjaluoto.
Digital innovation & enterprise in the sharing economy: An action research agenda.
Digital Business, 1 (2020), pp. 100-126
[Sharma, 2020]
S.K. Sharma.
Financial Development and Economic Growth in Selected Asian Economies: A Dynamic Panel ARDL Test.
Contemporary Economics, 14 (2020), pp. 201-219
[Shereni, 2019]
N.C. Shereni.
The tourism sharing economy and sustainability in developing countries: Contribution to SDGs in the hospitality sector.
African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure, 8 (2019), pp. 1-10
[Tabeikyna et al., 2021]
E.K. Tabeikyna, G.T. Kamalova, E.L. Hasanov, K.V. Dzhumagaliyeva, N.K. Demeuova.
The place of intelligentsia in socio-economic development of society: the creative perspective.
Creativity Studies, 14 (2021), pp. 235-250
[Tan et al., 2021]
L.P. Tan, M. Sadiq, T.M. Aldeehani, S. Ehsanullah, P. Mutira, H.M. Vu.
How COVID-19 induced panic on stock price and green finance markets: global economic recovery nexus from volatility dynamics.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, (2021),
[van Niekerk, 2020]
A.J. van Niekerk.
Inclusive economic sustainability: SDGs and global inequality.
Sustainability, 12 (2020), pp. 5427-5439
[van Zanten and van Tulder, 2021]
J.A. van Zanten, R. van Tulder.
Towards nexus-based governance: defining interactions between economic activities and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 28 (2021), pp. 210-226
[Vasylieva et al., 2019]
T. Vasylieva, O. Lyulyov, Y. Bilan, D. Streimikiene.
Sustainable economic development and greenhouse gas emissions: The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption, GDP, and corruption.
Energies, 12 (2019), pp. 3289-3308
[Wang et al., 2019]
Y. Wang, D. Xiang, Z. Yang, S.S. Ma.
Unraveling customer sustainable consumption behaviors in sharing economy: A socio-economic approach based on social exchange theory.
Journal of Cleaner Production, 208 (2019), pp. 869-879
[Wei et al., 2021]
C. Wei, J. Wu, Y. Guo, G. Wei.
Green supplier selection based on CODAS method in probabilistic uncertain linguistic environment.
Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 27 (2021), pp. 530-549
[Xiang et al., 2021]
H. Xiang, P. Ch, M.A. Nawaz, S. Chupradit, A. Fatima, M. Sadiq.
Integration and economic viability of fueling the future with green hydrogen: An integration of its determinants from renewable economics.
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, (2021),
[Xueying et al., 2021]
Xueying, W., Sadiq, M., Chien, F., Ngo, T. Q., & Nguyen, A. T. (2021). Testing role of green financing on climate change mitigation: Evidences from G7 and E7 countries, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15023-w
[Zamora-Polo et al., 2019]
F. Zamora-Polo, J. Sánchez-Martín, M. Corrales-Serrano, L. Espejo-Antúnez.
What do university students know about sustainable development goals? A realistic approach to the reception of this UN program amongst the youth population.
Sustainability, 11 (2019), pp. 1-19
[Zhao et al., 2021]
L. Zhao, Y. Zhang, M. Sadiq, V.M. Hieu, T.Q. Ngo.
Testing green fiscal policies for green investment, innovation and green productivity amid the COVID-19 era.
Economic Change and Restructuring, (2021),
[Zygmunt, 2020]
J. Zygmunt.
The effect of changes in the economic structure on entrepreneurial activity in a transition economy: the case of Poland.
Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 15 (2020), pp. 49-62
Copyright © 2022. The Author(s)
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo