Información del artículo
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Biblografía
[1.]
J. Marión, S. Peiró, S. Márquez, R. Meneu.
Variaciones en la práctica médica: importancia, causas, implicaciones.
Med Clin (Barc), 110 (1998), pp. 382-390
[2.]
R. Meneu.
Variabilidad de las decisiones médicas y su repercusión sobre las poblaciones.
[3.]
J.A. Marqués Espí, S. Peiró, J. Medrano Heredia.
Variaciones en las tasas estandarizadas de intervenciones quirúrgicas en la provincia de Alicante.
[4.]
S. Peiró, R. Meneu.
Variaciones en la práctica médica: implicaciones para la práctica clínica y la política sanitaria.
Gac Sanit, 11 (1998), pp. 55-58
[5.]
J.E. Wennberg, A. Gittelsohn.
Small area variations in health care delivery. A population-based health information system can guide planning and regulatory decision-making.
Science, 18 (1973), pp. 1102-1108
[6.]
J.E. Wennberg, A.M. Gittelsohn.
Variations in medical care among small areas.
Sci Am, 264 (1982), pp. 100-101
[7.]
K. McPherson, J.E. Wennberg, O.E. Hovind, P. Clifford.
Smallarea variations in the use of common surgical procedures: an international comparison of New England, England, and Norway.
N Eng J Med, 307 (1982), pp. 1.310-1.314
[8.]
S. Peiró, R. Meneu, J.A. Marqués, J. Librero, R. Ordiñana.
La variabilidad en la práctica médica: relevancia, estrategias de abordaje y política sanitaria.
Papeles de Economía Española, 76 (1998), pp. 165-175
[9.]
J.E. Wennberg, B.A. Barnes, M. Zubkoff.
Professional uncertainty and the problem of supplier-induced demand.
Soc Sci Med, 16 (1982), pp. 811-824
[10.]
D.M. Eddy.
Variations in physician practice. The role of uncertainty.
Health Aff, 3 (1984), pp. 74-89
[11.]
K. McPherson.
The best and the enemy of the good: randomised controlled trials, uncertainty, and assessing the role of patient choice in medical decision making.
J Epidemiol Community Health, 48 (1994), pp. 6-15
[12.]
J.E. Wennberg.
Which rate is right?.
N Eng J Med, 314 (1986), pp. 310-311
[13.]
R. Meneu, V. Ortún, S. Peiró.
Medicina basada en la evidencia: posibilidades y limitaciones para la compra de servicios.
La contratación de servicios sanitarios, pp. 185-207
[14.]
S. Peiró.
Variaciones en la práctica médica y resultados de salud: informando las elecciones clínicas y de política sanitaria. En: Variaciones en la práctica médica, investigación en resultados y toma de decisiones compartidas.
[15.]
S. Peiró.
Limitaciones y autolimitaciones de la medicina basada en la evidencia para la práctica clínica y la atención sanitaria.
Med Clin (Barc), 118 (2002), pp. 49-56
[16.]
J.F. Kasper, A.G. Mulley, J.E. Wennberg.
Developing shared decisionmaking programs to improve the quality of health care.
Qual Rev Bull, 18 (1992), pp. 183-190
[17.]
J. Kassirer.
Incorporating Patient Preferences into Medical Decisions.
N Engl J Med, 330 (1994), pp. 1.895-1.896
[19.]
A. Coulter, V. Peto, H. Doll.
Patients' preferences and general practitioners' decisions in the treatment of menstrual disorders.
Fam Pract, 11 (1994), pp. 67-74
[20.]
A.B. Flood, J.E. Wennberg, R.F. Nease, F.J. Fowler, J. Ding, L.M. Hynes.
The importance of patient preference in the decision to screen for prostate cancer. Prostate Patient Outcomes Research Team.
J Gen Intern Med, 11 (1996), pp. 342-349
[21.]
A.A. Montgomery, T. Fahey.
How do patients' treatment preferences compare with those of clinicians?.
Qual Health Care, 10 (2001), pp. i39-i43
[22.]
J. Protheroe, T. Fahey, A.A. Montgomery.
The impact of patients' preferences on the treatment of atrial fibrillation: observational study of patient-based decision analysis.
BMJ, 320 (2000), pp. 1380-1384
[23.]
A.L. Kinmonth, A. Woodcock, S. Griffin, N. Spiegal, M.J. Campbell.
Randomised controlled trial of patient centred care of diabetes in general practice: impact on current wellbeing and future disease risk. The Diabetes Care From Diagnosis Research Team.
BMJ, 317 (1998), pp. 1.202-1.208
[24.]
R.J. Volk, A.R. Cass, S.J. Spann.
A randomized controlled trial of shared decision making for prostate cancer screening.
Arch Fam Med, 8 (1999), pp. 333-340
[25.]
R.B. Deber, H.A. Llewellyn-Thomas, P. Gladstone, R.J. Cusimano, K. O'Rourke, G. Tomlinson, et al.
Randomized, controlled trial of an interactive videodisc decision aid for patients with ischemic heart disease.
J Gen Intern Med, 15 (2000), pp. 685-693
[26.]
E. Murray, H. Davis, S.S. Tai, A. Coulter, A. Gray, A. Haines.
Randomised controlled trial of an interactive multimedia decision aid on benign prostatic hypertrophy in primary care.
BMJ, 323 (2001), pp. 493-496
[27.]
E. Murray, H. Davis, S.S. Tai, A. Coulter, A. Gray, A. Haines.
Randomised controlled trial of an interactive multimedia decision aid on hormone replacement therapy in primary care.
BMJ, 323 (2001), pp. 490-493
[28.]
T. Hope.
Evidence based patient choice.
[29.]
A. Coulter.
Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision making.
J Health Ser Res Policy, 2 (1997), pp. 112-121
[30.]
C. Charles, A. Gafni, T. Whelan.
Shared decision making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or, it takes at least two to tango).
Soc Sci Med, 44 (1997), pp. 681-692
[31.]
C. Charles, A. Gafni, T. Whelan.
Decision making in the physicianpatient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision making model.
Soc Sci Med, 49 (1999), pp. 651-661
[32.]
S. Moira.
Towards a global definition of patient centred care. The patient should be the judge of patient centred care.
BMJ, 322 (2001), pp. 444-445
[33.]
G.J. Elwyn, A. Edwards, R. Gwyn.
Towards a feasible model for shared decision making: focus group study with general practice registrars.
BMJ, 319 (1999), pp. 753-756
[34.]
C. Charles, A. Gafni, T. Whelan.
How to improve communication between doctors and patients.
BMJ, 320 (2000), pp. 1220-1221
[35.]
A. Edwards, G. Elwyn.
Developing professional ability to involve patients in their care: pull or push?.
Qual Saf Health Care, 10 (2001), pp. 129-130
Copyright © 2003. Elsevier España, S.L. y Sociedad Española de Medicina Rural y Generalista (SEMERGEN)
