Información del artículo
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Referencias Bibliográficas
[1.]
Phillips R, Ball C, Sackett D, Badenoch D, Straus S, Haynes B, Dawes M. Levels of Evidence and Grades of Recommendations. Disponible en: http://minerva.minervation.com/cebm/docs/levels.html [consultado: 26/11/2002]
[2.]
C.A. Silagy.
An analysis of review articles published in primary care journals.
Fam Pract, 10 (1993), pp. 337-341
[3.]
D.G. Altman.
Statistics in medical journals: some recent trends.
Stat Med, 19 (2000), pp. 3275-3289
[4.]
G.V. Glass.
Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research.
Educ Res, 5 (1976), pp. 3-8
[5.]
G. Andrews, B. Guitar, P. Howie.
Meta-analysis of the effects of stuttering treatment.
J Speech Hear Disord, 45 (1980), pp. 287-307
[6.]
C. Mulrow, D. Cook.
Systematic Reviews. Synthesis of Best Evidence for Health Care Decisions.
[7.]
F. Davidoff, K. Case, P.W. Fried.
Evidence-Based Medicine: Why all the fuss? [Editorial].
Ann Intern Med, 122 (1995), pp. 727
[8.]
M. Egger, G.D. Smith, A.N. Phillips.
Meta-analysis: Principles and procedures.
BMJ, 315 (1997), pp. 1533-1537
[9.]
V. Abraira.
Medidas del efecto de un tratamiento (II): odds ratio y número necesario para tratar.
SEMERGEN, 27 (2001), pp. 418-420
[10.]
V. Abraira.
Estimación: intervalos de confianza.
SEMERGEN, 28 (2002), pp. 84-85
Copyright © 2003. Elsevier España, S.L. y Sociedad Española de Medicina Rural y Generalista (SEMERGEN)
