covid
Buscar en
Revista Colombiana de Anestesiología
Toda la web
Inicio Revista Colombiana de Anestesiología Educación en reanimación básica: Qué tanto y cómo se aprende
Información de la revista
Vol. 36. Núm. 1.
Páginas 33-38 (febrero - abril 2008)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 36. Núm. 1.
Páginas 33-38 (febrero - abril 2008)
ARTICULO DE REFLEXIÓN
Open Access
Educación en reanimación básica: Qué tanto y cómo se aprende
Visitas
3076
William F. Amaya Zúñiga*, Luisa F. cepeda Pinzón**, Alexandra chaves Vega***
* Anestesiólogo, miembro del comité de Reanimación de la Sociedad Colombiana de Reanimación, Bogotá, D.C.
** Residente de Anestesiología, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, Bogotá, D.C.
*** Anestesióloga, jefe, Sección de Educación y Docencia Departamento de Anestesia Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogotá, D.C.
Este artículo ha recibido

Under a Creative Commons license
Información del artículo
Resumen

Las guías en Reanimación propuestas por la Sociedad Americana del Corazón enfatizan en la necesidad del correcto aprendizaje e implementación de las técnicas, habilidades y conocimientos en reanimación cardiocerebropulmonar básica como base fundamental y como determinante principal en las tasas de morbimortalidad de los pacientes que se presentan con paro cardiorrespiratorio. De igual manera plantea un verdadero reto para el personal lego y personal relacionado con el área de la salud que actúan como primeros respondientes en la atención de estos pacientes, y que hace necesario que se conozcan y se apliquen de manera optima los procedimientos propuestos por la Sociedad Americana del Corazón. Esto a su vez implica que este personal debe tener un adecuado entrenamiento para la adquisición de habilidades y destrezas correctas y además, que perduren en el tiempo, y es allí, donde la educación en reanimación juega un papel muy importante a través de la formación teórica y practica, mediante grupos operativos de trabajo que guíen el aprendizaje, y el uso de tecnología en simulación que permite la retroalimentación de los procedimientos aprendidos. Es indispensable entonces, el conocimiento y evaluación de las tasas de efectividad de los diferentes cursos en Reanimación diseñados, y de especial interés el ofrecido por el comité de Reanimación de la Sociedad Colombiana de Anestesiología y Reanimación en donde actualmente se lleva a cabo un estudio en investigación para determinar la efectividad en el aprendizaje e identificar las posibles debilidades que puedan mejorarse y ofrecer así educación de alta calidad.

Palabras claves:
educación en CCPR básica
técnicas
habilidades
morbimortalidad
Summary

The resuscitation guidelines proposed by the American Heart Association (AHA) emphasize the need for a proper learning and implementation of techniques, skills and knowledge regarding basic cerebral cardiopulmonary resuscitation as a fundamental basis and principal determinant of morbidity and mortality rates of patients presenting with cardio respiratory arrest. Likewise, the AHA`s guidelines state a truly challenge for the non expert (lego or non health care professional) persons and health care related workers, who are the first responders in the medical care process of these patients; this situation generates the need for the knowledge and optimal implementation of the procedures proposed by the American Heart Association.

This in turn implies that these personnel must have adequate training to acquire correct skills and abilities, which endure over time, and it is there, where the education in resuscitation plays a very important role across the theoretical and practical training, working through task forces that guide the learning and the use of simulation technology that allows a feedback process of the procedures learned.

It is essential then, the knowledge and assessment of the effectiveness rates in the different designed courses of Resuscitation, and the special interest offered by the committee of Resuscitation of the Colombian Society of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation where is currently carrying out a study of investigation to determine the effectiveness in learning and identifying the potential weaknesses that can be improved and so provide high quality education.

Key Words:
CCPR Education
techniques
skills
morbility
mortality
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
REFERENCIAS
[1.]
M. Hazinski, V. Nadkarni.
Major changes in the 2005 AHA guidelines for CPR and ECC: reaching the tipping point for change.
Circulation, 112 (2005), pp. 206-211
[2.]
2005 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Part 4: Adult Basic Life Support.
[3.]
2005 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Part 3: Overview of CPR.
[4.]
J.W. Heidenreich, A.B. Sanders.
Uninterrupted chest compression CPR is easier to perform and remember than standard CPR.
Resuscitation, 63 (2004), pp. 123-130
[5.]
H. Kuhnigk, P. Sefrin.
Skills and self-assessment in cardiopulmonary resuscitation of the hospital nursing staff.
Eur J Emerg Med, 1 (1994), pp. 193-198
[6.]
J.W. Heidenreich, T.A. Higdon.
Single-rescuer cardiopulmonary resuscitation: ‘two quick breaths’--an oxymoron.
Resuscitation, 62 (2004), pp. 283-289
[7.]
T.P. Aufderheide, R.G. Pirrallo.
Incomplete chest wall decompression: a clinical evaluation of CPR performance by EMS personnel and assessment of alternative manual chest compression-decompression techniques.
Resuscitation, 64 (2005), pp. 353-362
[8.]
L. Wik, H. Myklebust.
Twelve-month retention of CPR skills with automatic correcting verbal feedback.
[9.]
L. Wik, H. Myklebust.
Retention of basic life support skills 6 months after training with an automated voice advisory manikin system without instructor involvement.
Resuscitation, 52 (2002), pp. 273-279
[10.]
C.F. Babbs, K.B. Kern.
Optimum compression to ventilation ratios in CPR under realistic, practical conditions: a physiological and mathematical analysis.
Resuscitation, 54 (2002), pp. 147-157
[11.]
T.A. Higdon, J.W. Heidenreich.
Single rescuer cardiopulmonary resuscitation: can anyone perform to the guidelines 2000 recommendations?.
[12.]
J. Nyman, M. Sihvonen.
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills in nurses and nursing students.
Resuscitation, 47 (2000), pp. 179-184
[13.]
I. Buck-Barrett, I. Squire.
The use of basic life support skills by hospital staff; what skills should be taught?.
Resuscitation, 60 (2004), pp. 39-44
[14.]
C. Gasco, M. Avellanal.
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation training for students of odontology: skills acquisition after two periods of learning.
Resuscitation, 45 (2000), pp. 189-194
[15.]
V. Leah, M. Whitbread.
Resuscitation training for medical students.
Resuscitation, 39 (1998), pp. 87-90
[16.]
G. Perkins, J. Hulme.
Basic life support training for health care students.
Resuscitation, 41 (1999), pp. 19-23
[17.]
D. Chamberlain, A. Smith.
Trials of teaching methods in basic life support (3): comparison of simulated CPR performance after first training and at 6 months, with a note on the value of re-training.
Resuscitation, 53 (2002), pp. 179-187
[18.]
S. Coopera, E. Johnstona.
Immediate life support (ILS) training Impact in a primary care setting?.
[19.]
V. Wenzel, P. Lehmkuhl.
Poor correlation of mouth-to-mouth ventilation skills after basic life support training and 6 months later.
Resuscitation, 35 (1997), pp. 129-134
[20.]
Tok D., G.T. Keles.
Basic Life Support Skills of Doctors in a Hospital Resuscitation Team.
Tohoku J Exp Med, 203 (2004), pp. 123-128
[21.]
B.B. Spooner, J.F. Fallaha.
An evaluation of objective feedback in basic life support (BLS) training.
Resuscitation, 73 (2007), pp. 417-424
[22.]
M. Connolly, P. Toner.
The ‘ABC for life’ programme - Teaching basic life support in schools.
Resuscitation, 72 (2007), pp. 270-279
[23.]
O. Robak, J. Kulnig.
CPR in medical schools: learning by teaching BLS to sudden cardiac death survivors - a promising strategy for medical students?.
BMC Medical Education, 6 (2006), pp. 27
[24.]
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Improving patient safety through simulation research.
[25.]
D.M. Gaba.
The future vision of simulation in health care.
Qual Saf Health Care, 13 (2004), pp. 2-10
[26.]
E.H. Sinz.
Anesthesiology National CME Program and ASA Activities in Simulation.
Anesthesiology Clin, 25 (2007), pp. 209-223
[27.]
M.A. DeVita, J. Schaefer, J. Lutz.
Improving medical emergency team (MET) performance using a novel curriculum and a computerized human patient simulator.
Qual. Saf. Health Care, 14 (2005), pp. 326-331
[28.]
A. Nishisaki, R. Keren.
Does Simulation Improve Patient Safety?: Self-Efficacy, Competence, Operational Performance, and Patient Safety.
Anesthesiology Clin, 25 (2007), pp. 225-236
[29.]
C. Graham, N. Lewis.
A scoring system for the assessment of basic life support ability.
Resuscitation, 43 (2000), pp. 111-114
[30.]
J. Jansen, H. Berden.
Evaluation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills of general practitioners using different scoring methods.
Resuscitation, 34 (1997), pp. 35-41
[31.]
C.A. Lester, C.L. Morgan.
Assessing with CARE: An innovative method of testing the approach and casualty assessment components of basic life support, using video recording.
Resuscitation, 34 (1997), pp. 43-49
[32.]
E.A. Hunt, N.A. Shilkofski.
Simulation: Translation to improved team Performance.
Anesthesiology Clin, 25 (2007), pp. 301-319
[33.]
M. Vasco.
Cambios en el manejo de la vía aérea en eventos no traumçaticos durante la reanimación cardiopulmonar.
Rev. Col. Anest, 35 (2007), pp. 59-66
Copyright © 2008. Revista Colombiana de Anestesiología
Opciones de artículo