Información de la revista
Vol. 20. Núm. 6.
Páginas 363-365 (noviembre - diciembre 2013)
Vol. 20. Núm. 6.
Páginas 363-365 (noviembre - diciembre 2013)
Open Access
La presión no miente
The pressure does not lie
Visitas
1840
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
W. Wijns, P. Kolh, N. Danchin, C. Di Mario, V. Falk, T. Folliguet, et al.
Guidelines on myocardial revascularization.
Eur Heart J, 31 (2010), pp. 2501-2555
[2.]
E.J. Topol, S.E. Nissen.
Our preoccupation with coronary luminology. The dissociation between clinical and angiographic findings in ischemic heart disease.
Circulation, 92 (1995), pp. 2333-2342
[3.]
M.J. Kern.
Coronary physiology in the cath lab: beyond the basics.
Cardiol Clin, 29 (2011), pp. 237-267
[4.]
N. Gonzalo, J. Escaned, F. Alfonso, C. Nolte, V. Rodriguez, P. Jimenez-Quevedo, et al.
Morphometric assessment of coronary stenosis relevance with optical coherence tomography: a comparison with fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound.
J Am Coll Cardiol, 59 (2012), pp. 1080-1089
[5.]
P. Garrone, G. Biondi-Zoccai, I. Salvetti, N. Sina, I. Sheiban, P.R. Stella, et al.
Quantitative coronary angiography in the current era: principles and applications.
J Interv Cardiol, 22 (2009), pp. 527-536
[6.]
C.W. White.
Clinical applications of Doppler coronary flow reserve measurements.
Am J Cardiol, 71 (1993), pp. 10D-16D
[7.]
N.H. Pijls, P. van Schaardenburgh, G. Manoharan, E. Boersma, J.W. Bech, M. van’t Veer, et al.
Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study.
J Am Coll Cardiol, 49 (2007), pp. 2105-2111
[8.]
P.A. Tonino, B. De Bruyne, N.H. Pijls, U. Siebert, F. Ikeno, M. van’ t Veer, et al.
Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention.
N Engl J Med, 360 (2009), pp. 213-224
[9.]
B. De Bruyne, N.H. Pijls, B. Kalesan, E. Barbato, P.A. Tonino, Z. Piroth, et al.
Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease.
N Engl J Med, 367 (2012), pp. 991-1001
[10.]
S. Sen, J. Escaned, I.S. Malik, G.W. Mikhail, R.A. Foale, R. Mila, et al.
Development and Validation of a New Adenosine-Independent Index of Stenosis Severity From Coronary Wave-Intensity Analysis: Results of the ADVISE (ADenosine Vasodilator Independent Stenosis Evaluation) Study.
J Am Coll Cardiol, 59 (2012), pp. 1392-1402
Copyright © 2013. Sociedad Colombiana de Cardiología y Cirugía Cardiovascular