metricas
covid
Buscar en
Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría (English Edition)
Toda la web
Inicio Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría (English Edition) We have to talk about prevention and psychosis
Información de la revista
Vol. 51. Núm. 2.
Páginas 82-84 (abril - junio 2022)
Vol. 51. Núm. 2.
Páginas 82-84 (abril - junio 2022)
Letter to the Editor
Acceso a texto completo
We have to talk about prevention and psychosis
Tenemos que hablar sobre prevención, psicosis
Visitas
317
Scarlett Juliet Torres Saavedra
Autor para correspondencia
scarlettjts98@gmail.com

Corresponding author.
, Germán Víctor Martin Rossani Alatrista
Facultad de Medicina Humana, Universidad Ricardo Palma, Lima, Perú
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Texto completo
Dear Editor,

There are few psychiatric conditions more destabilising for the person who suffers from it and their family than psychosis. Therefore, having analysed the review article “Review of early intervention programmes for psychosis: implementation proposal in Peru” published in Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría,1 we can see that it is essential to establish an early intervention programme, but not only based on the early identification of psychotic symptoms themselves or the observation of first episodes of psychosis (FEP). We also need to be attentive to prodromal symptoms that serve as warning signs to identify patients with high-risk mental states (HRMS).

The Domínguez et al. study found significant differences between the HRMS and FEP groups (Table 1), including that the age at onset of nonspecific symptoms, the first specialised treatment, and prodromal symptoms were later in patients with FEP than in patients with HRMS; these patients also had higher scores in symptoms in general, mania and premorbid adjustment from early adolescence.2 This period of prepsychotic disturbance can be prolonged, with a mean duration of 1–5 years, and is often associated with substantial levels of psychosocial impairment and disability.2

Table 1.

Differences found in the Domínguez et al. study.2

  HRMS (n=43)a  FEP (n=40)b 
Main reason for consulting a mental health service  State of mood/depression/sadness/low self-esteem  Paranoid thoughts/suspiciousness or delusions 
Current psychiatric treatment  Antidepressant medication predominant  Antipsychotic medication predominant 
[0,1–3]History of current disorder
Age (years) at onset of nonspecific symptoms  14.5±4.1  21.6±7.0 
Age (years) at onset of prodromal symptoms  17.4±3.4  23.1±6.0 
Age (years) at onset of psychotic symptoms  N/A  24.1±6.2 
Age (years) at the first specialist psychiatry psychology visit  18.4±4.5  24.1±6.4 
Duration of untreated illness (DUI) (weeks)  94.1±185.4  72.1±144.9 
Duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) (weeks)  N/A  55.1±100.2 
[0,1–3]
[0,1–3]Symptom severity
General CGI  2.9±0.8  3.4±1.0 
General PANSS  36.8±9.0  31.5±8.2 
Prodromal symptoms (CAARMS)  Severity  Frequency  Severity  Frequency 
Positive symptoms  9.5±3.6  10.4±4.0  N/A  N/A 
Cognitive change  4.3±1.8  3.4±1.4  N/A  N/A 
Emotional disorder  5.1±2.9  6.7±4.3  N/A  N/A 
Negative symptoms  7.8±3.0  9.1±3.0  N/A  N/A 
Behavioural change  8.6±3.4  8.5±3.8  N/A  N/A 
Motor/physical changes  4.7±3.23  4.2±3.4  N/A  N/A 
General psychopathology  13.7±5.8  12.9±6.3  N/A  N/A 
[0,1–5]Affective symptoms
Mania (YMRS)  [0,2–3]4.8±4.8[0,4–5]2.6±3.8
Depression (CDS)  [0,2–3]6.7±4.9[0,4–5]5.2±4.8
Premorbid adjustment (PAS)c, n  [0,2–3]43[0,4–5]40
Childhood  [0,2–3]0.31±0.14[0,4–5]0.25±0.15
[0,2–3]43[0,4–5]40
Early adolescence  [0,2–3]0.41±0.16[0,4–5]0.30±0.18
[0,2–3]38d[0,4–5]36d
Late adolescence  [0,2–3]0.44±0.17[0,4–5]0.33±0.17
[0,2–3]30e[0,4–5]32e
Adulthood  [0,2–3]0.49±0.15[0,4–5]0.41±0.19
Quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF)f, n  [0,2–3]41[0,4–5]25g
Total quality of life score  [0,2–3]5.9±1.9[0,4–5]6.6±1.4

CAARMS: Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States interview; CDS: Calgary Depression Scale; CGI: clinical global impression scale; DUI: duration of untreated illness; DUP: duration of untreated psychosis; HRMS: high-risk mental states; N/A: not applicable; PANSS: Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale; PAS: premorbid adjustment scale; FEP: first-episode psychosis; WHOQOL-BREF: short version of the World Health Organisation quality of life questionnaire; YMRS: Young Mania Rating Scale.

Unless otherwise indicated, values are express mean±standard deviation.

a

Age 14–30 years.

b

Age 16–40 years.

c

A lower score indicates a “healthier” level of functioning.

d

The PAS late adolescence subscale was not applicable to patients under 15 years of age.

e

The PAS adult subscale was not applicable to patients under 18 years of age.

f

A higher score indicates a better quality of life.

g

The WHOQOL-BREF data were only collected from 25 patients with FEP because this questionnaire was not initially included in the assessment protocol for patients with FEP, but was included later.

In an analysis of the different factors in the affected person's own environment, Ortega et al., for example, found that one risk factor for psychosis accompanied by more severe positive psychotic symptoms is child abuse.3 An association was also found between sexual abuse and greater severity of hallucinatory symptoms and delusions, while an increase in the intensity of negative symptoms is associated with neglect.3

There is evidence that, in families with high degrees of expressed emotion, there is a higher rate of relapses.4 Betsen et al. found that single-parent families, such as single mothers who spent a lot of time with their schizophrenic son, fostered more anxiety and depression.5 Meanwhile, Anderson et al. report that there is a correlation between a very limited social network and the patient having had a much longer illness.6

This is just a small example of the fact that social environment and previous experiences have a fundamental influence on the development of psychosis and the severity of presentation. I completely agree that we live in a country with a high degree of stigmatisation around and discrimination against schizophrenia,1 and in fact against psychiatric disorder, so it is important to promote a culture of mental health free from any sense of shame or stigma. It is evident that we urgently need an early intervention programme. Whatever type of programme is established, it is essential that it also assesses family members and possible emotional precipitants. Such interventions must particularly be accompanied by awareness campaigns to remove prejudices about the different disorders and symptoms. This is important, as early detection can alert us and help prevent the chronic and disabling illness, the all-too-usual poor prognosis leading to increased mortality rates and high economic costs that stem from psychosis, and, from that, the quintessential psychosis which is schizophrenia.7

References
[1]
R. Valle.
Revisión de los programas de intervención temprana de psicosis: propuesta de implementación en Perú.
Rev Colomb Psiquiatr., 49 (2020), pp. 178-186
[2]
T. Domínguez-Martínez, P. Cristóbal-Narváez, R.T. Kwapil, N. Barrantes-Vidal.
Características clínicas y psicosociales de pacientes con estados mentales de alto riesgo y primeros episodios de psicosis de un programa de psicosis incipiente en Barcelona (España).
Actas Esp Psiquiatr., 45 (2017), pp. 145-156
[3]
L. Ortega, I. Montalvo, M. Solé, M. Creus, Á. Cabezas, A. Gutiérrez-Zotes, et al.
Relación entre el maltrato infantil y la adaptación social en una muestra de jóvenes atendidos en un servicio de intervención precoz en psicosis.
Rev Psiquiatría Salud Mental., 13 (2020), pp. 131-139
[4]
A. Perales.
Manual de Psiquiatría “Humberto Rotondo”.
[5]
H. Bentsen, B. Boye, O.G. Munkvold, T.H. Notland, A.B. Lersbryggen, K.H. Oskarsson, et al.
Emotional overinvolvement in parents of patients with schizophrenia or related psychosis: demographic and clinical predictors.
Br J Psychiatry., 169 (1996), pp. 622-630
[6]
C.M. Anderson, G. Hogarty, T. Bayer, R. Needleman.
Expressed emotion and social networks of parents of schizophrenic patients.
Br J Psychiatry., 144 (1984), pp. 247-255
[7]
A.S. Cabrera, C. Michel, L. Cruzado.
Estados clínicos de alto riesgo para esquizofrenia y otras formas de psicosis: una breve revisión.
Rev Neuropsiquiatr., 80 (2017),

Please cite this article as: Torres Saavedra SJ, Rossani Alatrista GVM. Tenemos que hablar sobre prevención, psicosis. Rev Colomb Psiquiat. 2022;51:82–84.

Copyright © 2020. Asociación Colombiana de Psiquiatría
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo