metricas
covid
Buscar en
Revista Colombiana de Reumatología
Toda la web
Inicio Revista Colombiana de Reumatología Validez y confiabilidad de la Escala de Tinetti para población colombiana
Información de la revista
Vol. 19. Núm. 4.
Páginas 218-233 (diciembre 2012)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 19. Núm. 4.
Páginas 218-233 (diciembre 2012)
Acceso a texto completo
Validez y confiabilidad de la Escala de Tinetti para población colombiana
Validity and reliability of Tinetti Scale for Colombian people
Visitas
29268
Camila Rodríguez Guevara1,
Autor para correspondencia
, Luz Helena Lugo2
1 Unidad de Medicina Física y Rehabilitación. Clínica Las Américas. Medellín. Colombia
2 Grupo de Rehabilitación en Salud, Universidad de Antioquia. Medellín. Colombia
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Resumen
Introducción

Las caídas, son el cuarto síndrome geriátrico con mayor prevalencia, incrementan la morbilidad y la mortalidad, disminuyen la funcionalidad, y aumentan prematuramente el ingreso a los hogares geriátricos. Las alteraciones de la marcha y el equilibrio son los principales factores que las generan, con un rango de valores ajustados de riesgo relativo entre 1.2–2.2 y 1.2–2.4, respectivamente. La escala de Tinetti de marcha y equilibrio ha demostrado ser una herramienta válida y confiable para la evaluación de la movilidad (r 0.74–0.93), además, tiene una alta fiabilidad inter-observador (0.95).

Objetivo

Validar la Escala de Tinetti, a partir de su versión original, para el uso en población colombiana.

Materiales y métodos

La escala de Tinetti en su versión en español fue aplicada por dos evaluadores a 90 adultos mayores, residentes de tres instituciones geriátricas de la ciudad de Medellín y dos municipios del Valle de Aburrá con diferentes grados de funcionalidad en la marcha y en el equilibrio. Posteriormente, se realizó la validación de contenido, constructo y criterio, así como fiabilidad inter e intraobservador.

Resultados

La validez de contenido, sugiere la reestructuración de los ítems del dominio del equilibrio con un alfa de Cronbach de 0.95 y una varianza de 13.89; en la validez de constructo, en 46 de las 48 respuestas de la escala se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en la capacidad de detectar cambios en un grupo sin alteraciones en la marcha y el equilibrio (sanos) comparado con el grupo con alteraciones (enfermos); la validez de criterio concurrente logró una alta correlación r:-0.82 con el test “Timed up and go”. La fiabilidad inter e intraobservador obtuvo un Kappa ponderado de 0.4 a 0.6 y 0.6 a 0.8, respectivamente; el alpha de Cronbach fue de 0.91.

Conclusiones

La escala de Tinetti es válida y confiable para utilizarla en adultos mayores en Colombia.

Palabras clave:
Adultos mayores
Caídas
Escala de Tinetti
Validación
Fiabilidad
Summary
Introduction

Falls are the fourth most prevalent geriatric syndrome which diminishes body functionality and increases morbidity, mortality, and early admission to nursing homes. Gait and postural balance alterations are the main generating factors with Risk Relative from 1.9 to 6-6 and from 1.2 to 2.2 respectively. The Tinetti Balance and Gait Assessment Scale has proved to be a valid and reliable tool to evaluate mobility (r 0.74–0.93) and also has high inter-observer reliability (0.95).

Objective

To validate the Tinetti Scale for its use in Colombian population, starting from its original version.

Materials and Methods

The Spanish version of the Tinetti Scale was applied by two evaluators to 90 elderly persons with different degrees of gait and balance functionality. All of the evaluated live in nursing homes located three in Medellin and two municipalities of the Aburrá Valley. Subsequently performed the statistical process of validation and reliability.

Results

The content validity suggests the re-structuring of the items in the domain of equilibrium with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.948 and a variance of 13,894, in the construct validity, 46 of the 48 responses of the scale differences statistically significant in the ability to detect changes in a group without alterations in gait and balance (healthy) and a group with these conditions (sick); the concurrent validity had a high correlation r = -0.82 with Timed up and go. The inter and intra–rater reliability was between 0.4 to 0.6 and 0.6 to 0.8, respectively. The Cronbach's alpha was 0.91.

Conclusions

The Tinetti Scale is valid and reliable for its use in Colombian population. Exploratory analysis of the validity of content suggests a restructuring of the scale items in one domain, since it represents a larger number of factors.

Key words:
Elderly people
Falls
Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA)
Reliability
Validity
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Referencias
[1.]
W.C. Graafmans, M.E. Ooms, H.M.A. Hofstee.
A prospective study of risk profiles.
Am J Epidemiol, 143 (1996), pp. 1129-1136
[2.]
J. Fabre, R. Ellis, M. Kosma, R. Wood.
Falls risk factors and a compendium of falls risk screening instruments.
J Geriatr Phys Ther, 33 (2010), pp. 184-197
[3.]
American Geriatric Society British Geriatrics Society and American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeon Panel on Falls Prevention.
Guideline for the prevention of falls in older people.
J Am Geriatr Soc, 49 (2001), pp. 664-672
[4.]
J.G. Buckley, K. Heasley, A. Scally, D.B. Elliott.
The effects of blurring vision on medio-lateral balance during stepping up or down to a new level in the elderly.
Gait Posture, 22 (2005), pp. 146-153
[5.]
M. Faber, R. Bosscher, V. Wieringen.
Clinimetric Properties of the Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment.
PHYS THER, 86 (2006), pp. 944-954
[6.]
M.E. Tinetti, D. Baker, M. King.
Effect of Dissemination of Evidence in Reducing Injuries from Falls.
New Engl J Med, 359 (2008), pp. 252-261
[7.]
M.E. Tinetti, C. Kumar.
The patient who falls “It's always a trade-off”.
JAMA, 303 (2010), pp. 258-266
[8.]
S. Lamb, E. Jorstad-Stein, K. Hauer, C. Becker.
Behalf of the Prevention of Falls Network Europe and Outcomes Development of a Common Outcome Data Set for Fall Injury Prevention Trials: The Prevention of Falls Network Europe Consensus.
J Am Geriatr Soc, 53 (2005), pp. 1618-1622
[9.]
C. Romero, J.M. Baena, M.C. De Hoyos.
Actividades preventivas en los mayores.
Aten Primaria, 32 (2003), pp. 102-120
[10.]
M.E. Tinetti.
Preventing Falls in Elderly Persons.
N Engl J Med, 348 (2003), pp. 42-49
[11.]
M. Mun San, J. Close, A. Kwok.
Falls Incidence Risk Factors, and Consequences in Chinese Older People: A Systematic Review.
J Am Geriatr Soc, 59 (2011), pp. 536-543
[12.]
S. Deprey.
Descriptive Analysis of Fatal Falls of Older Adults in a Midwestern County In the Year.
J Geriatr Phys Ther, 32 (2005), pp. 23-28
[13.]
F. Bloch, D. Thibaud, B. Dugué, C. Bréque, A.S. Rigaud.
Episodes of falling among elderly people: a systematic review and meta-analysis of social and demographic pre-disposing characteristics.
CLINICS, 65 (2010), pp. 895-903
[14.]
D. Wert, J. Talkowski, J. Brach, J. VanSwearingen.
Characteristics of Walking, Activity, Fear of Falling, and Falls in Community-Dwelling Older Adults by Residence.
J Geriatr Phys Ther, 33 (2010), pp. 41-45
[15.]
C. Persad, S. Cook, B. Giroadin.
Assessing falls in the elderly: should we use simple screening test or comprehensive fall risk evaluation?.
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med, 46 (2010), pp. 249-259
[16.]
M.E. Tinetti.
Preventing falls in elderly persons.
J Am Geriatr Soc, 34 (1986),
[17.]
T. Ser Quijano, J. Del Peña–Casanova.
Evaluación Neuropsicológica y funcional de la demencia.
Editores JR Prous, (1994),
[18.]
C. Curcio, J. Gómez, I. Galeano.
Validez y reproducibilidad de las medidas basadas en la ejecución.
Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol, 35 (2000), pp. 82-88
[19.]
R. Lam.
Office management of gait disorders in the elderly Care of the Elderly Series Clinical Review.
Can Fam Physician, 57 (2011), pp. 765-770
[20.]
D. Wrisley, A. Neeraj.
Funtional Gait Assessment: concurrent, discriminative and predictive validity in Community dwelling older adults, 90 (2010), pp. 761-773
[21.]
F. Franchignoni, F. Horak, M. Godi, A. Nardone, A. Giordano.
Using psychometric techniques to improve the Balance Evaluation System's Test: the mini-BESTest.
J Rehabil Med, 42 (2010), pp. 323-331
[22.]
R. Di Fabio, R. Seay.
Use of the “Fast Evaluation of Mobility Balance, and Fear” in Elderly Community Dwellers: Validity and Reliability.
Phys Ther, 77 (1997), pp. 904-917
[23.]
L. Panella, C. Tinelli, A. Buizza.
Towards objective evaluation of balance in the elderly: validity and reliability of a measurement instrument applied to the Tinetti test.
INT J REHABIL RES, 31 (2008), pp. 65-72
[24.]
D. Kegelmeyer, A. Kloos, K. Thomas.
Reliability and Validity of the Tinetti Mobility Test for Individuals With Parkinson Diseases.
Phys Ther, 87 (2007), pp. 1369-1378
[25.]
R. Sánchez, M. Ibañez, A. Pinzón.
Análisis Factorial de la revisión en español de la escala Bref Psychiatric Rating Scale en Colombia.
Biomédica, 25 (2005), pp. 120-128
[26.]
L.W. Chu, I. Chi.
Incidence and Predictors of Falls in the Chinese Elderly.
Ann Acad Med Singapore, 34 (2005), pp. 60-72
[27.]
C. Sterke, S. Huisman, E. Van Beeck.
Is the Tinetti performance oriented mobility assessment (POMA) a feasible and valid prector of short-term fall risk in nursing home residents with dementia?.
Int Psychogeriatr, 22 (2010), pp. 251-263
[28.]
Pérez A, Rodríguez MN, Gil JF, Ramírez GA. Tamaño de la muestra versión 1.1. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. Unidad de Epidemiología Clínica. http://hermes.javeriana.edu.co/tamamu.
[29.]
A. Donner, M. Eliasziw.
Sample Size Requirements for Reliability Studies.
Statistics in Medicine, (1987), pp. 441-448
[30.]
Beaton D, Bombardier C, Guillemin F. Guidelines for the Process of Cross –cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures. SPINE; 25:3186-91.
[31.]
P. Yim, L. Talbot.
Defining and Measuring Balance in Adults.
Biol Res Nurs, (2000), pp. 321-331
[32.]
V.P. Panzer, D.B. Wakefield, C.B. Hall, L.I. Wolfson.
Mobility assessment: sensitivity and specificity of measurement sets in older adults.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 92 (2011), pp. 905-912
[33.]
L.M. Cipriany-Dacko, D. Innerst, J. Johannsen, V. Rude.
Interrater reliability of the Tinetti Balance Scores in novice and experienced physical therapy clinicians.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 78 (1997), pp. 1160-1164
[34.]
J. Verghese, H. Buschke, L. Viola, M. Katz, C. Hall, G. Kuslansky, R. Lipton.
Validity of divided attention tasks in predicting falls in older individuals: a preliminary study.
J Am Geriatr Soc, 50 (2002), pp. 1572-1576
[35.]
M. Vassallo, R. Stockdale, J.C. Sharma, R. Briggs, S. Allen.
A comparative study of the use of four fall risk assessment tools on acute medical wards.
J Am Geriatr Soc, 53 (2005), pp. 1034-1038
[36.]
M.C. Richaud.
Desarrollos del análisis factorial para el estudio de ítem dicotómico y ordinales.
Interdisciplinaria, 22 (2005), pp. 237-251
[37.]
J.A. López.
Análisis psicométrico de la escala de marcha y equilibrio de Tinetti con el modelo de Rasch.
Fisioterapia, 31 (2009), pp. 192-202
[38.]
J. Thomas.
A Pilot Study to Explore the Predictive Validity of 4 Measures of Falls Risk in Frail Elderly Patients.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 86 (2005), pp. 1636-1640
[39.]
N. Harada, V. Chiu, J. Damron-Rodríguez.
Screening for Balance and Mobility Impairment in Elderly Individuals Living in Residential Care Facilities.
Physical Therapy, 75 (1995), pp. 462-469
[40.]
C. Romero, J.M. Baena, M.C. De Hoyos.
Actividades preventivas en los mayores.
Aten Primaria, 32 (2003), pp. 102-120
[41.]
C. Vass, O. Sahota, A. Drummond, D. Kendrik.
REFINE (Reducing Falls in In-patient Elderly) –a randomised controlled trial.
[42.]
M.R. Lin, H.F. Hwang, M.H. Hu, H.D. Wu, Y.W. Wang, F.C. Huang.
Psychometric comparisons of the timed up and go, one-leg stand, functional reach, and Tinetti balance measures in community-dwelling older people.
J Am Geriatr Soc, 52 (2004), pp. 1343-1348
[43.]
C. Roqueta, E. Jaime, R. Mirallesa.
Experiencia en la evaluación del riesgo de caídas Comparación entre el test de Tinetti y el Timed Up & Go.
Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol, 42 (2007), pp. 319-327
[44.]
I. Marín León, F. Pozo Rodríguez.
Validez de las pruebas diagnósticas y de detección: la incertidumbre en la práctica clínica.
Medicina Interna,
[45.]
J.A. Dewane.
Documenting balance and functional outcomes: tips from the clinic.
Top Geriatr Rehabil, 13 (1997), pp. 23-32
[46.]
K. Mitchell, R. Newton.
Performance-oriented mobility assessment (POMA) balance score indicates need for assistive device.
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol, 1 (2006), pp. 183-189
[47.]
J.T. Chang, S.C. Morton, L.Z. Rubenstein, W.A. Mojica, M. Maglione, M.J. Suttorp, et al.
Interventions for the prevention of falls in older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.
Br Med J, 328 (2004), pp. 1-7
[48.]
S. Conroy, D. Kendrick, R. Harwood, J. Gladman.
A multicentre randomised controlled trial ofday hospital-based falls prevention programme for a screened population of community-dwelling older people at high risk of falls.
Age and Ageing, 39 (2010), pp. 704-710
[49.]
W. Blank, E. Ellen Freiberger, M. Siegris.
An interdisciplinary intervention to prevent falls in community-dwelling elderly persons: protocol of a cluster-randomized trial [PreFalls].
BMC Geriatrics, 11 (2011), pp. 1-6
[50.]
O. De Vries, G. Peeters, P. Elders.
Multifactorial Intervention to Reduce Fallsin Older People at High Risk of Recurrent Falls.
Arch Intern Med, 170 (2010), pp. 1110-1117
[51.]
Beling J, Roller M. Multifactorial Intervention with Balance Training as a Core Component Among Fall-prone Older Adults. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 32:3-09.

Los autores declaran no presentar ningún conflicto de interés al momento de la redacción del manuscrito.

Copyright © 2012. Asociación Colombiana de Reumatología
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo