metricas
covid
Buscar en
Revista Iberoamericana de Micología
Toda la web
Inicio Revista Iberoamericana de Micología Filamentous fungi in the airway of patients with cystic fibrosis: Just spectator...
Información de la revista
Vol. 38. Núm. 4.
Páginas 168-174 (octubre - diciembre 2021)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Visitas
1242
Vol. 38. Núm. 4.
Páginas 168-174 (octubre - diciembre 2021)
Original article
Acceso a texto completo
Filamentous fungi in the airway of patients with cystic fibrosis: Just spectators?
Hongos filamentosos en la vía aérea de pacientes con fibrosis quística: ¿meros espectadores?
Visitas
1242
Clara Viñadoa,
Autor para correspondencia
cmvinnado@salud.aragon.es

Corresponding author.
, Rosa María Girónb, Elisa Ibáñezc, Alberto García-Ortegad, Inés Pérezd, Dinora Polancoe, Javier Pemánc, Amparo Soléd
a Servicio de Neumología del Hospital de Barbastro, Spain
b Unidad de Fibrosis Quística del Hospital Universitario de la Princesa de Madrid, Spain
c Servicio de Microbiología del Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe de Valencia, Spain
d Unidad de Fibrosis Quística y Trasplante Pulmonar del Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe de Valencia, Spain
e Servicio de Neumología del Hospital Universitario Arnau de Vilanova de Lleida, Spain
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Resumen
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Figuras (2)
Tablas (5)
Table 1. Baseline clinical characteristics of patients taken from their first consultation and the intravenous antimicrobial treatment received.
Table 2. Isolated species of fungi and bacteria.
Table 3. Values recorded throughout the study in the group of patients with repeated filamentous fungi isolation (with or without antifungal treatment) and in the group without fungal isolations.
Table 4. Impact of the different antifungal treatments and concomitant infections in functional respiratory evolution. FEV1: maximum expiratory volume in the first second (values in litres); FVC: volume of exhaled air during a maximal aspiration (values in litres).
Table 5. Scores on the CFQ-R and the statistical significance when comparing the group with repeated isolation of filamentous fungi that did not receive treatment and the group without fungal isolations. Each category is scored from 0 to 100, with higher scores corresponding to better quality of life.
Mostrar másMostrar menos
Abstract
Background

There are important advances in the management of bacterial infection in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF), but there are many gaps in the field of fungal infections.

Aims

The aim of this study was to analyse whether chronic respiratory filamentous fungal colonization had clinical impact and whether antifungal treatment can change the disease.

Methods

The prospective, bicentric and descriptive study was carried out within a 3-year follow-up period, with four-month periodicity medical controls. Adult patients from two CF units of tertiary hospitals were included. Clinical, microbiological, analytical and spirometric variables were collected. Quality of life was evaluated in a subgroup, using the Spanish version of the Revised Cystic Fibrosis Quality of Life Questionnaire (CFQ-R). To statistically analyze the evolution of forced expiratory along time (volume of air blown out in 1 second -FEV1-) and the forced vital capacity (FVC), mixed linear models were carried out.

Results

From the ninety-eight patients under study, 40 suffered chronic filamentous fungal colonization. The presence of filamentous fungi in airway was associated to an annual fall of FEV1 and FVC of 0.029 and 0.017 litres, respectively (p<0.001). In addition, worse quality of life based on CFQ-R, significant when concerning physical condition and emotional state, was also linked with the fungal colonization. Protocolized antifungal therapy, nebulized or oral, improved FEV1 in 0.023 and 0.024 litres per year, respectively (p<0.001).

Conclusions

Chronic filamentous fungal colonization in patients with CF is associated with a significant annual decline of lung function that persists over time. Chronic antifungal therapy slows down this progression, mainly in the patient with more advanced disease.

Keywords:
Cystic fibrosis
Moulds
Aspergillus spp.
Scedosporium apiospermum
Lomentospora prolificans
Antifungal therapy
Quality of life
CFQ-R
Resumen
Antecedentes

Existen avances importantes en el manejo de la infección bacteriana en pacientes con fibrosis quística (FQ), pero hay muchas lagunas en el campo de las infecciones fúngicas.

Objetivos

El objetivo del estudio fue analizar si la colonización respiratoria crónica por hongos filamentosos tenía impacto clínico y si el tratamiento antifúngico modificaba la enfermedad.

Métodos

Estudio prospectivo, bicéntrico y descriptivo con un seguimiento de 3 años y controles médicos cuatrimestrales. Se incluyeron pacientes adultos de dos Unidades de Fibrosis Quística de hospitales terciarios. Se recogieron datos de variables clínicas, microbiológicas, analíticas y espirométricas; en un subgrupo se evaluó la calidad de vida mediante el cuestionario específico para FQ (CFQ-R). Para analizar estadísticamente la evolución a lo largo del tiempo del volumen espiratorio máximo en el primer segundo (FEV1) y la capacidad vital forzada (FVC) se realizaron modelos lineales mixtos.

Resultados

De los 98 pacientes incluidos en el estudio, 40 presentaron colonización crónica por hongos filamentosos. La presencia de hongos filamentosos en la vía aérea se asoció a una caída anual del FEV1 y FVC de 0,029 y 0,017 litros, respectivamente (p<0,001), además de a una peor calidad de vida según el CFQ-R, significativa en cuestiones como la capacidad física y el estado emocional. La terapia antifúngica protocolizada, nebulizada u oral, mejoraron el FEV1 0,023 y 0,024 litros al año, respectivamente (p<0,001).

Conclusiones

La colonización crónica por hongos filamentosos en pacientes con FQ se asocia a una caída anual de la función pulmonar significativa que persiste en el tiempo. El tratamiento antifúngico protocolizado ralentiza este deterioro funcional, fundamentalmente en el paciente con enfermedad más avanzada.

Palabras clave:
Fibrosis quística
Hongos filamentosos
Aspergillus spp.
Scedosporium apiospermum
Lomentospora prolificans
Tratamiento antifúngico
Calidad de vida
CFQ-R
Texto completo

The presence of filamentous fungi in the airway of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) is a common occurrence because this population group is subjected to many antimicrobial31 treatments and have a particular airway (hyperviscosity of mucus, alteration of both the mucociliary transport and the local immune response). Despite this, its role in the pathogenesis of the pulmonary disease is unknown. The fungi most commonly isolated in the patient with CF are yeasts, followed by filamentous fungi.30Aspergillus fumigatus is the most common of the filamentous fungi,9,19 followed by Aspergillus terreus, Scedosporium apiospermum and Lomentospora prolificans, all of which are related to infectious18 or allergic2,26 responses in the host with CF, but with no specific pathogenic pattern or specific patient profile.6 Yeasts, such as Candida albicans, are isolated in 50%-75% of respiratory samples and are usually considered colonizers; their involvement in lung function impairment is unknown.17 After Aspergillus, Scedosporium and L. prolificans are the most common etiological agents and are a reason for concern in CF, given its intrinsic resistance to most antifungal agents.8

The aim of this study was to analyse the impact of chronic respiratory filamentous fungal colonization using clinical and functional parameters, and to analyse the efficacy of the antifungal treatment. We also tried to determine whether there is a patient profile with CF more proned to suffer these infections and, therefore, a candidate for treatment.

Patients and methods

A prospective, bicentric and descriptive study was carried out within a 3-year protocolized follow-up period, with adult patients who attended the CF units of the University Hospital La Fe (Valencia) and the Hospital de La Princesa (Madrid). The project was approved by the Ethics Committee of Clinical Research of the University Hospital La Fe, registered number 2011/0159. The patients were recruited consecutively from 1st April 2012. Inclusion criteria were as follows: patients over 14 years of age suffering from CF, with no transplants, and who carried chronically a filamentous fungus (three or more isolations in sputum culture or other respiratory secretions per year). Exclusion criteria included being in treatment with CFTR modulators (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator), solid organ transplant, and colonization by filamentous fungi when the study variables were not assessed at least twice a year during the three years of follow-up.

Clinical, microbiological, analytical and spirometric data were collected every 4 months throughout the 3 years of follow-up, together with information about the antifungal treatment received in those cases where it was prescribed.4The quality of life of a subgroup of patients was also quantified through a specific quality of life questionnaire for CF (CFQ-R).

The variables analyzed and evaluated in each consultation were age, sex, body mass index, associated comorbidities (hepatopathy and/or diabetes), identification of the filamentous fungus obtained in culture (species), concomitant infection/bronchial colonization (bacteria, mycobacteria, Nocardia) when the filamentous fungus was isolated, number of oral antibiotic cycles, number of hospital admissions, number of days of intravenous antimicrobial treatment during hospital admission, long-term treatment with azithromycin and/or ibuprofen, previous history of haemoptysis or pneumothorax, and allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis criteria at onset or developed during patient follow-up. The genetic study (mutation F508del in homozygosis) of all patients included in the study was obtained. For the evaluation of lung function, the following variables were recorded: absolute value and percentage of the maximum expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC) and FEV1/FVC index using a spirometry test performed in each consultation. Respiratory samples (direct sputum samples) were taken in sterile conditions from the patients with CF that were clinically stable at the time of consultation, and they were immediately processed using Sabouraud culture medium (in agar and liquid) with 2% chloramphenicol. The media were incubated at 37 ̊C. The yeasts and bacteria isolated were identified using mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF, bioMérieux), whereas filamentous fungi were identified by macro and microscopic morphology. Antifungal susceptibility tests were also performed.

Antimicrobial therapy was applied in case of respiratory exacerbations. This treatment was oral in the case of mild to moderate episodes, or intravenous in the severe ones. The drugs and doses used in the oral cycles were ciprofloxacin 750 mg/12 h or sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim 800/160 mg every 12 h for 14 days. In the intravenous cycles, drug combinations were used: one beta-lactam and one aminoglycoside, for example 4/0.5 g piperacillin/tazobactam every 8 h, 2 g/8 h ceftazidime or 2 g/8 h meropenem combined with 1 g/24 amikacin or 300 mg/24 h tobramicin (depending on plasma concentrations) for at least 14 days. In some cases linezolid (600 mg/12 h) was added.

Twenty six patients of the group with chronic filamentous fungus colonization (65%) received a protocolized long-term antifungal treatment during the three years of follow-up. The therapeutic protocol consisted in having inhaled amphotericin B lipid complex or azoles.15,23 The inhaled amphotericin B dose was 25 mg three times a week for two months, followed by a weekly dose for 6 months and, lastly, two doses per month until the end of the follow-up period. The voriconazole dose was 200 mg/12 h for 3 months each year throughout the 3 years of follow-up; the posaconazole dose was 300 mg/day, after a loading dose of 300 mg/12 h the first 24 h, for 3 three months each year throughout the 3 years of follow-up. Antifungal therapy selection was the choice of the physician responsible for the patient and the criterion to start it was the persistence of clinical and/or functional impairment even after the administration of the intravenous antibiotic therapy. Plasma concentrations of voriconazole were systematically monitored.7 Liver function was checked every six months through blood analyses in all patients, except for those under antifungal treatment (blood analyses were done monthly); blood analyses included alanine aminotransferasae, aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, gamma-glutamiltransferase, and direct and indirect billirubin.

Statistical analysis was performed using R software (version 3.6.0) and the R lmer (version 1.1-23) package. Data were summarized by median and standard deviation for quantitative variables and percentages for categorical variables. To evaluate the evolution of the FEV1 and the FVC over time in patients with different characteristics, lower-order interaction mixed lineal models were used. The information provided by the CFQ-R was also studied in each group using mixed lineal regression models for each of the 12 sections of the questionnaire. Statistical significance was considered at p<0.05.

Results

Ninety eight patients out of 200 patients with CF were finally considered for the study once the exclusion criteria were applied (Fig. 1). Out of these 98 patients, 40 presented with chronic fungal colonization (with three or more isolations of filamentous fungi per year), whilst from the remaining 58 patients no filamentous fungi were isolated during follow-up (control group). Of the 40 patients with fungal isolations, 26 were treated with long-term antifungal therapy and 14 were not. The clinical characteristics of the patients are described in Table 1 and the isolated fungi species are listed in Table 2.

Fig. 1.

Flowchart of patients recruitment and follow-up.

(0.22MB).
Table 1.

Baseline clinical characteristics of patients taken from their first consultation and the intravenous antimicrobial treatment received.

  Repeated isolation of filamentous fungi 
  Yes (n=40)No (n=58) 
  Antifungal treatment 
  Yes (n=26)  No (n=14)   
Age (years)  20.5±6.08  19±4.09  21.6±7.64 
FEV1(liters)  1.79±0.48  2.99±1.06  3.01±1.18 
FEV1(%)  58.9±15.23  63.34±16.78  95.7±18.36 
FVC (liters)  2.87±0.78  3.95±1.39  4±1.56 
FVC (%)  78.15±17.82  82.5±17.56  104.2±16.46 
FEV1/FVC  68.38±12.62  72.42±9.95  72.55±9.15 
IMC (kg/m2)  18.5±3.13  19±4.5  22±4.98 
Woman  12 (46.15%)  10 (71.43%)  31 (53.45%) 
Mutation F508del in homozygosis  7 (26.92%)  8 (57.14%)  20 (34.48%) 
Complications
Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis  3 (11.54%)  2 (14.29%)  0 (0%) 
Hemoptisis  6 (23.08%)  5 (35.71%)  0 (0%) 
Neumothrax  0 (0%)  0 (0%)  0 (0%) 
Drugs administered
Ibuprofen  13 (50%)  9 (64.29%)  22 (38.6%) 
Azithromycin  19 (73.08%)  14 (100%)  25 (43.1%) 
Amikacin (iv)  4 (15.38%)  4 (28.57%)  1 (1.72%) 
Piperacillin/tazobactam (iv)  3 (11.54%)  1 (7.14%)  1 (1.72%) 
Linezolid (iv)  7 (26.92%)  7 (50%)  6 (10.34%) 

BMI: body mass index; FEV1: maximum expiratory volume in the first second; FVC: volume of air exhaled during maximal expiration; iv: intravenous.

Table 2.

Isolated species of fungi and bacteria.

Isolation  Species  n (%) 
AspergillusAspergillus fumigatus  15 (37.5%) 
Aspergillus flavus  2 (5%) 
Aspergillus niger  2 (5%) 
Aspergillus terreus  3 (7.5%) 
Scedosporium-LomentosporaLomentospora prolificans  1 (2.5%) 
Scedosporium apiospermum  4 (10%) 
Isolation of two fungi speciesAspergillus fumigatus+Candida albicans  7 (17.5%) 
Aspergillus fumigatus+Candida parapsilosis  1 (2.5%) 
Lomentospora prolificans+Candida albicans  1 (2.5%) 
Aspergillus fumigatus+Scedosporium apiospermum  4 (10%) 
Combinations of fungus (fungi)+bacterium (bacteria)Aspergillus fumigatus+Pseudomonas aeruginosa  11 (27.5%) 
Aspergillus fumigatus+Staphylococcus aureus  3 (7.5%) 
Aspergillus fumigatus+Candida albicans+Staphylococcus aureus+Pseudomonas aeruginosa  7 (17.5%) 
Aspergillus fumigatus+Candida parapsilosis+Pseudomonas aeruginosa+Staphylococcus aureus  1 (2.5%) 
Aspergillus fumigatus+Scedosporium apiospermum+Staphylococcus aureus  2 (5%) 
Aspergillus flavus+Staphylococcus aureus  1 (2.5%) 
Aspergillus niger+Staphylococcus aureus  2 (5%) 
Aspergillus terreus+Staphylococcus aureus+Pseudomonas aeruginosa  3 (7.5%) 
Lomentospora prolificans+Candida albicans+Staphylococcus aureus+Pseudomonas aeruginosa  1 (2.5%) 

Regarding the concomitant bacterial infections, 23 patients (57.7%) from the group colonized by filamentous fungi presented with chronic infection by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, eight from the group with antifungal treatment and 15 from the group with no treatment, compared with eight patients (14.04%) from the control group. Chronic infection by Staphylococcus aureus was diagnosed in twenty patients (50%) from the group with fungal presence, in 10 patients from the group with antifungal treatment and in 10 from the group with no treatment, compared with 31 patients (53.45%) from the control group. Both the chronic concomitant infection by P. aeruginosa and by S. aureus had hardly any impact on the evolution of the FEV1 (annual loss of 0.03 and 0.01 litres), i.e. functional impairment was not linked to these bacterial infections. However, it is of note that the patients with a combination of A. fumigatus and P. aeruginosa required a larger number of oral cycles and a longer time of intravenous treatment compared with the other combinations. The patients with chronic colonization by filamentous fungi suffered a significantly higher number of exacerbations, hospital stays and days of intravenous antimicrobial treatment compared with the patients without isolations (Table 3), all linked with lower survival.12 Diagnoses of hepatopathy and diabetes related with CF and haemoptysis were more common in the group of patients with filamentous fungi than in the group without them.

Table 3.

Values recorded throughout the study in the group of patients with repeated filamentous fungi isolation (with or without antifungal treatment) and in the group without fungal isolations.

  Presence of filamentous fungi and antifungal treatment  No fungal isolations  p value  Presence of filamentous fungi without antifungal treatment  No fungal isolations  p value 
Number of oral cycles  7±5.84  4±3.27  0.031  7±3.35  4±3.27  0.027 
Number of hospital admissions  1±2.3  0±1.27  <0.001  3±2.18  0±1.27   
Number of intravenous treatment days  30±49.53  0±18.65  <0.001  32±29.16  0±18.65  <0.001 
Hepatopathy  4 (15.38%)  1 (1.72%)  <0.001  6 (6.12%)  1 (1.72%)   
Diabetes  5 (19.23%)  0 (0%)  <0.001  7 (7.14%)  0 (0%)   
Haemoptysis  6 (23.08%)  0 (0%)  <0.001  7 (50%)  0 (0%)   

Regression analyses were used to study the evolution of FEV1 and FVC in the three groups (Table 4). In the group with no fungal colonization, we observed an annual increase in FEV1 of 0.005 litres, which was statistically significant, and an annual decrease of 0.001 litres of FVC, which was not statistically significant. In contrast, in patients with a presence of filamentous fungi in the airway who had not received antifungal treatment, an annual drop in FEV1 and FVC of 0.029 and 0.017 litres, respectively, was observed, which was statistically significant in both cases (Fig. 2). This means that the drop in FEV1 in patients colonised by filamentous fungi without antifungal treatment in our study was 1.34% per year, and 0.52% in the case of FVC. In the control group an increase of 0.18% per year in FEV1 and a drop in FVC of 0.027% was registered.

Table 4.

Impact of the different antifungal treatments and concomitant infections in functional respiratory evolution. FEV1: maximum expiratory volume in the first second (values in litres); FVC: volume of exhaled air during a maximal aspiration (values in litres).

  Annual variation with regard to mean±SD  95% Confidence limitP value 
    Lower limit  Upper limit   
Repeated isolation of filamentous fungi with antifungal treatment
Lipid amphoteracin B complex
FEV1  0.023±0.006  0.01  0.036  <0.001 
FVC  0.014±.008  −0.002  0.03  0.093 
Voriconazole
FEV1  0.024±0.005  0.015  0.033  <0.001 
FVC  0.011±0.006  0.022  0.049 
Posaconazole
FEV1  0.009±0.006  −0.004  0.021  0.161 
FVC  0.002±0.008  −0.014  0.017  0.816 
Repeated isolation of filamentous fungi with no antifungal treatment
FEV1  −0.029±0.003  −0.035  −0.023  <0.001 
FVC  −0.017±0.004  −0.025  −0.009  <0.001 
No fungal isolations
FEV1  0.005±0.003  0.011  0.04 
FVC  −0.001±0.003  −0.008  0.006  0.788 
FEV1 and presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa  −0.03±0.022  −0.073  0.012  0.159 
FEV1 and presence of Staphylococcus aureus  −0.01±0.017  −0.043  0.024  0.573 
Fig. 2.

Comparison of the FEV1 evolution (volume in litres of air exhaled in the first second) in two groups.

(0.16MB).

Regarding the group under antifungal treatment, five patients (12.5%) received inhaled amphotericin B lipid complex, 14 patients (35%) received oral voriconazole and seven patients (17.5%) oral posaconazole following the same therapeutic protocol schedule.28 In all treated cases a functional improvement was observed with regard to their baseline status, which was statistically significant in the cases treated with inhaled amphotericin B lipid complex and voriconazole (Table 3).

No relevant adverse effects took place during treatment administration, nor were there any major changes in liver function, and all the isolates were sensible to the antifungal treatment administered. The mean of plasma concentrations of voriconazole was 3.1 mg/ml. In 27 patients (20 from the group with chronic colonization by filamentous fungi who did not receive antifungal treatment and seven from the control group) the quality of life was measured through a questionnaire. A significant drop in quality of life was observed in the group of colonized patients in four sections out of the 12 in the questionnaire: “physical ability”, “limitations of role”, “emotional state” and “social isolation” (Table 5).

Table 5.

Scores on the CFQ-R and the statistical significance when comparing the group with repeated isolation of filamentous fungi that did not receive treatment and the group without fungal isolations. Each category is scored from 0 to 100, with higher scores corresponding to better quality of life.

Category  Repeated isolation of filamentous fungip 
  Yes (n=20)No antifungal treatment  No (n=7)   
Physical functioning  68.937±10.254  88.332±8.825  <0.0001 
Role functioning  81.560±7.889  98.001±6.79  0.047 
Energy  65.614±8.929  71.291±7.685  0.53 
Subjective health perception  63.106±8.032  79.345±6.913  0.053 
Emotional state  81.910±6.49  85.543±5.586  <0.001 
Social limitations  68.697±8.047  86.986±6.926  0.031 
Body image  79.865±6.552  95.686±5.639  0.022 
Eating disturbance  87.293±9.258  86.345±7.968  0.919 
Treatment burden  51.338±6.959  57.55±5.99  0.38 
Weight problems  75.598±12.083  86.813±10.4  0.361 
Respiratory symptoms  67.948±5.448  68.387±4.689  0.936 
Digestive symptoms  80.862±6.105  81.095±5.255  0.97 
Discussion

The study of respiratory infections in patients with CF has been focused for decades on bacterial infections, mainly P. aeruginosa, and on their impact in the natural evolution of the disease16; fungi remained secondary, generally considered as mere spectators of the chronic bronchial infection. Thanks to the development of molecular techniques, mostly metagenomics, it is possible to quickly and simply identify multiple pathogens comprising the microbiota of the airways of patients with respiratory diseases such as CF,29 and this is helpful in the therapeutic management of these patients. This study is a prospective and long-to-medium term analysis of the impact of colonization by filamentous fungi in the evolution of CF. The presence of filamentous fungi in patients with CF is associated with a significant, persistent drop in lung function in follow-up time.

Previous studies have already demonstrated an association between the presence of yeasts in the airway of CF patients and some respiratory impairment.10,13,21,27 Amin et al. also demonstrated the relationship between A. fumigatus and poorer lung function, although the association between A. fumigatus and P. aeruginosa were related to low lung function.3 In our series, concomitant bacterial infections themselves do not justify the loss of annual lung function, although patients infected by P. aeruginosa presented with a FEV1 which was lower at the start of the study. In our study, patients chronically colonized by filamentous fungi had a poorer lung function, a greater number of pulmonary exacerbations, more hospital stays and more oral antibiotic cycles. Furthermore, they suffered, with a higher frequency, diabetes, hepatopathy and a poorer nutritional status, comorbidities which led to the impairment of their immune system and increased the risk of the presence of fungi in the airway, which was associated with a poorer prognosis in CF evolution.25 In contrast, in one prospective series focused on the role of Scedosporium, no significant differences were found in either FEV1 or in the number of annual exacerbations among patients infected by this fungus, compared with those who were not, although this study did not have a three-year follow-up period.22 Co-infection with Pseudomonas could account for the higher number of exacerbations, hospital admissions and more prolonged intravenous treatment times. In fact, in regular clinical practice, when there is a functional respiratory impairment or clinical impoverishment along with bacterial isolation in sputum, treatment is usually directed against bacteria, even although a fungus is also isolated in the respiratory sample.11 For this reason, these patients may receive a greater number of antibiotic cycles without the expected clinical and/or functional improvement, since no treatment against the fungus that could be involved in the pulmonary exacerbation process is administered. Furthermore, the quality of life of these patients is impaired in “physical ability” and “emotional state” aspects, and these concepts are directly related to the survival of these patients.1,5,24

One relevant fact in this study is that it proved that chronic antifungal treatment slows down the annual drop in the pulmonary function of these patients. In fact, antifungal therapy leads to slight improvement of the FEV1 in patients who are chronically colonized. It is important to point out that both inhaled amphotericin B and azoles had a positive impact on lung function. This beneficial effect was less evident in patients treated with oral posaconazole, possibly because they were in a more serious condition (higher number of pulmonary exacerbations and intravenous antibiotic cycles), but this data should be interpreted with caution, as antifungal concentrations in blood were not monitored during follow-up.7,20

The strength of our study comes from its prospective, highly homogenous design in therapeutic protocols and with a follow-up of three years. However, the small sample size analyzed prevents us from extrapolating our findings to all patients with CF, being more studies to confirm our data necessary. Based on our findings we may state that the presence of a chronic filamentous fungus in the airway of a patient with CF steers the disease towards a more torpid evolution. In fact it is associated with factors of severity, such as the need for a higher number of intravenous antimicrobial treatment cycles, an increase in the number of hospital admissions, greater impairment of pulmonary function and poorer quality of life, all of which are related, per se, with poorer prognosis and higher mortality. Furthermore, strict follow-up is particularly important if the patient colonized by filamentous fungi suffers from diabetes, hepatopathy, haemoptysis or undernutrition.14 This study is supportive of the little existing evidence on the validity of establishing an antifungal treatment to slow down the annual drop in pulmonary function, particularly in the patient with a more advanced CF.

Financing

This study was partially financed by a grant awarded by the Spanish Society of Cystic Fibrosis in the year 2012.

Conflict of interests

The authors have no conflict of interests to declare directly or indirectly related to the contents of this manuscript.

References
[1]
Abbott J, Hart A, Morton AM, Dey P, Conway SP, Webb AK. Can health-related quality of life predict survival in adults with cystic fibrosis? Am J Respir Crit Care Med 179;54–8.
[2]
R. Agarwal, A. Chakrabarti, A. Shah, D. Gupta, J.F. Meis, R. Guleria, et al.
Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis: review of literature and proposal of new diagnostic and classification criteria.
Clin Exp Allergy, 43 (2013), pp. 850-873
[3]
R. Amin, A. Dupuis, S.D. Aaron, F. Ratjen.
The effect of chronic infection with Aspergillus fumigatus on lung function and hospitalization in patients with cystic fibrosis.
Chest, 137 (2010), pp. 171-176
[4]
A. Berlinski, M.J. Chambers, L. Willis, et al.
Redesigning care to meet national recommendation of four or more yearly clinic visits in patients with cystic fibrosis.
BMJ Qual Saf, 23 (2014), pp. i42-i49
[5]
M. Britto, U. Kotagal, R. Hornung, H. Atherton, J. Tsevat, R. Wilmott.
Impact of recent pulmonary exacerbations on quality of life in patients with cystic fibrosis.
Chest, 121 (2002), pp. 64-72
[6]
C. Castellani, A.J.A. Duff, S.C. Bell, H.G.M. Heijerman, A. Munck, F. Ratjen, et al.
ECFS best practice guidelines: the 2018 revision.
J Cyst Fibros, 17 (2018), pp. 153-178
[7]
J.L. Cendejas-Bueno, et al.
Indicaciones clínicas de la monitorización de azoles de uso sistémico Hacia la optimización del tratamiento de la infección fúngica.
Rev Esp Quimioter, 27 (2014), pp. 01-16
[8]
M. Chen, J. Zeng, G. Sybren De Hoog, B. Stielow.
The ‘species complex’ issue in clinically relevant fungi: a case study in Scedosporium apiospermum.
Fungal Biol, 120 (2016), pp. 137-146
[9]
D.W. Denning, J. Cadranel, C. Beigelman-Aubry, F. Ader, A. Chakrabarti, S. Blot, et al.
European Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases and European Respiratory Society. Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis: rationale and clinical guidelines for diagnosis and management.
Eur Respir J, 47 (2016), pp. 45-68
[10]
A. Hector, T. Kirn, A. Ralhan, U. Graepler-Mainka, S. Berenbrinker, J. Riethmueller, et al.
Microbial colonization and lung function in adolescents with cystic fibrosis.
J Cystic Fibros, 15 (2016), pp. 340-349
[11]
G. Hong, N. Lechtzin.
Cystic fibrosis: we see fungus among us, but should we care?.
[12]
Kerem E, Reisman J, Corey M, Canny GJ, Levison H. Prediction of mortality in patients with cystic fibrosis. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:1187–91.
[13]
C. Koch, M. Rainisio, U. Madessani, H. Harms, M. Hodson, G. Mastella, et al.
Presence of cystic fibrosis-related diabetes mellitus is tightly linked to poor lung function in patients with cystic fibrosis: data from the European Epidemiologic Registry of Cystic Fibrosis.
Pediatr Pulmonol, 32 (2001), pp. 343-350
[14]
M. Martín-Frías, L. Máiz, A. Carcavilla, R. Barrio.
Long-term benefits in lung function and nutritional status of strict metabolic control of cystic fibrosis-related diabetes.
Arch Bronconeumol (Engl Ed), 47 (2011), pp. 531-534
[15]
V. Monforte, A. López-Sánchez, F. Zurbano, P. Ussetti, A. Solé, C. Casals, et al.
Prophylaxis with nebulized liposomal amphotericin B for Aspergillus infection in lung transplant patients does not cause changes in the lipid content of pulmonary surfactant.
J Heart Lung Transplant, 32 (2013), pp. 313-319
[16]
M. Moreno, E. Quintana, L. Carrasco, E. Pérez, I. Delgado.
Mycobacterium lentiflavum en pacientes con fibrosis quística: ¿colonizante o patogénico?.
Arch Bronconeumol, 54 (2018), pp. 639-640
[17]
M. Muthig, A. Hebestreit, U. Ziegler, M. Seidler, F.M. Müller.
Persistence of Candida species in the respiratory tract of cystic fibrosis patients.
Med Mycol, 48 (2010), pp. 56-63
[18]
A. Paugam, M.T. Baixench, N. Demazes-Dufeu, P.R. Burgel, E. Sauter, R. Kanaan, et al.
Characteristics and consequences of airway colonization by filamentous fungi in 201 adult patients with cystic fibrosis in France.
Med Mycol, 48 (2010), pp. S32-S36
[19]
M. Pihet, J. Carrere, B. Cimon, D. Chabasse, L. Delhaes, F. Symoens, et al.
Occurrence and relevance of filamentous fungi in respiratory secretions of patients with cystic fibrosis—a review.
Med Mycol, 47 (2009), pp. 387-397
[20]
R.M. Rivosecchi, P. Samanta, M. Demehin, M.H. Nguyen.
Pharmacokinetics of azole antifungals in cystic fibrosis.
Mycopathologia, 183 (2018), pp. 139-150
[21]
H. Sanjay, Chotirmall, M. Catherine, N.G. Greene.
McElvaney, Candida species in cystic fibrosis: a road less travelled.
Med Mycol, 48 (2010), pp. S114-S124
[22]
C. Schwarz, C. Brandt, E. Antweiler, A. Krannich, D. Staab, et al.
Prospective multicenter German study on pulmonary colonization with Scedosporium/Lomentospora species in cystic fibrosis: epidemiology and new association factors.
[23]
A. Solé.
Invasive fungal infections in lung transplantation: role of aerosolised amphotericin B.
Int J Antimicrob Agents, 32 (2008), pp. S161-S165
[24]
A. Solé, A. Olveira, I. Pérez, et al.
Development and electronic validation of the revised Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire (CFQ-R Teen/Adult).
[25]
K. Staufer, E. Halilbasic, P. Hillebrand, et al.
Impact of nutritional status on pulmonary function after lung transplantation for cystic fibrosis.
United European Gastroenterol J, 6 (2018), pp. 1049-1055
[26]
D.A. Stevens, R.B. Moss, V.P. Kurup, A.P. Knutsen, P. Greenberger, M.A. Judson, et al.
Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in cystic fibrosis. State of the art: Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Consensus Conference.
Clin Infect Dis, 37 (2003), pp. S225-S264
[27]
A.J. Ullmann, M. Akova, R. Herbrecht, et al.
ESCMID* guideline for the diagnosis and management of Candida diseases 2012: adults with haematological malignancies and after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT).
Clin Microbiol Infect, 18 (2012), pp. 53-67
[28]
J.L. Wang, C.H. Chang, Y. Young-Xu, et al.
Systematic review and metaanalysis of the tolerability and hepatotoxicity of antifungals in empirical and definitive therapy for invasive fungal infection.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 54 (2010), pp. 2409-2419
[29]
S.D. Willger, et al.
Characterization and quantification of the fungal microbiome in serial samples from individuals with cystic fibrosis.
Microbiome, 2 (2014), pp. 40
[30]
S. Ziesing, S. Suerbaum, L. Sedlacek.
Fungal epidemiology and diversity in cystic fibrosis patients over a 5-year period in a national reference center.
Med Mycol, 54 (2016), pp. 781-786
[31]
A. Zolin, L. Naehrlich, J. van Rens, et al.
ECFSPR Annu Rep, (2015),
Copyright © 2021. Asociación Española de Micología
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo