metricas
covid
Buscar en
Revista Iberoamericana de Micología
Toda la web
Inicio Revista Iberoamericana de Micología Incidencia de dermatofitosis en hospital público en la ciudad de São Bernardo ...
Información de la revista
Vol. 26. Núm. 2.
Páginas 118-120 (junio 2009)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 26. Núm. 2.
Páginas 118-120 (junio 2009)
Acceso a texto completo
Incidencia de dermatofitosis en hospital público en la ciudad de São Bernardo do Campo, São Paulo, Brasil
Incidence of dermatophytosis in a public hospital of São Bernardo do Campo, São Paulo State, Brazil
Visitas
4585
Andréia Pelegrinia, Juliana Possatto Takahashia, Carolina de Queiroz Moreira Pereiraa, Rosemeire Bom Pessonia, Marta Cristina Souzaa
a Núcleo de Pesquisas Biológicas, Universidade Metodista de São Paulo, São Bernardo do Campo, São Paulo, Brazil
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Resumen
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Figuras (2)
Actualmente los casos de dermatofitosis en dispensarios de dermatología están aumentando. El control de la fuente de infección es fundamental para evitar su propagación, por ello es necesario realizar un diagnóstico preciso de dichas infecciones, ya que se pueden confundir con otros procesos dermatológicos producidos por agentes no fúngicos. Nuestro objetivo fue evaluar la incidencia de las dermatofitosis y sus agentes etiológicos en pacientes de un dispensario de dermatología en São Bernardo do Campo. Entre febrero de 2005 y mayo de 2006 se recolectaron 273 muestras por medio de procedimientos habituales en micología clínica, basados en el examen directo y cultivo. De todas las muestras sospechosas de infección fúngica recolectadas, el 19% presentó cultivo positivo, con predominio de onicomicosis. El examen microscópico fue positivo para Candida spp. en un 61,6%, reflejando el predominio de levaduras. Estos datos concuerdan con estudios científicos actuales que indican la baja prevalencia de hongos filamentosos como Epidermophyton, Trichophyton y Microsporum en dermatomicosis.
Palabras clave:
Infecciones fúngicas
Dermatofitos
Levaduras
Hongos filamentosos no dermatofitos
Candida
The incidence of cases of dermatophytosis in dermatology outpatient departments has increased in recent years. Infection control is essential to prevent transmission, and accurate diagnosis of this type of infection is important to avoid confusion with other dermatological processes caused by non-fungal agents. The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of dermatophytosis and its etiological agents in a public hospital of São Bernardo do Campo, Brazil. From February 2005 to May 2006, 273 samples were collected from 191 patients in a public dermatology outpatient department. The samples were collected according to conventional methods used in clinical mycology and direct examinations and cultures were performed. Of the samples suspected of fungal infection, 19% produced positive cultures, and the largest number of samples was from female patients between 31 and 40 years old. The most commonly infected area was the toenails, and the most common infective agents according to microscopic analysis and biochemical tests were the Candida species, which were responsible for 61.6% of the infections. These data agree with findings reported in the literature indicating a lower prevalence of filamentous fungi, such as Epidermophyton, Trichophyton, and Microsporum, in dermatomycosis.
Keywords:
Fungal infections
Dermatophytes
Yeasts
Non-dermatophyte filamentous fungi
Candida
Texto completo

Mycological infections represent important public health disorders, and their incidence has increased in recent years to the extent that they are now a frequent cause of visits to dermatology outpatient departments13. Studies in this area have shown that the increase in the incidence of these infections may be due to a number of reasons, such as the increase in a susceptible population, which includes the elderly and immunodeficient individuals, social and cultural exchanges associated with sports, the use of shoes with poor ventilation, the use of swimming pools, sharing of manicure instruments, and an increasing awareness that these mycoses need to be correctly diagnosed and treated5. In immunodeficient individuals the lesions become more intense, and what are initially superficial lesions can result in disseminated and fatal forms6,19. It has thus become more urgent to raise awareness of these infections and their etiology in hospitals so that the magnitude of this increasingly common problem in Brazil can be determined14 and efficient measures established to avoid transmission and spread of this disease. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the incidence of dermatophytosis and their causative agents in patients of a public hospital of São Bernardo do Campo, a municipality of São Paulo State, Brazil.

Patients and methods

From February 2005 to May 2006, 273 samples were collected from 191 patients being seen in a public dermatology outpatient department suspected of having a fungal infection. Before the samples were collected, the patients completed a form with information regarding gender, age, location of the lesion, clinical features (such as color and aspect), and predisposing factors (such as contact with animals and handling soil). The use of antifungal therapy was considered as an exclusion criterion. Materials were collected and a direct microscopic examination using 40% potassium hydroxide was performed. The specimens were then inoculated on Sabouraud Agar Medium (Difco) with chloramphenicol alone and with both chloramphenicol and cycloheximide and incubated for 4 weeks at 37 °C and room temperature, respectively. Cultures were examined every 5 days. After this period, negative and inconclusive samples were inoculated on Sabouraud Agar Medium again for confirmation and second samples were collected. Positive samples were identified according to the macroscopic and microscopic characteristics of their colonies using a fungi identification key2,9. For this purpose, a subculture was made onto Potato Agar Medium (Difco) for filamentous fungi or onto Cornmeal Agar supplemented with Tween 80 for yeasts. Identification of both moulds and yeasts was based on two successive collections of samples and examination of the clinical features of the lesions. Additionally, carbohydrate assimilation tests, based on traditional methodologies16. were used to identify yeasts. The data obtained were encoded in a database and submitted to analysis with Epi Info version 3.3.2; p-values with Yate's correction were used.

Results

Fifty-two samples (19%) produced positive cultures, while 221 (81%) were negative. Forty patients had positive samples, 29 (72%) females and 11 (28%) males, and as 12 patients had the infection in more than one anatomical location, the total number of samples was 52. Infections were the most frequent in females between 31 and 40 years old and males between 61 and 70 years old. Direct examination of the samples showed that 37 (71%) were positive and 15 (29%) negative. In terms of the anatomical location of the lesions, the most common infection sites were the toenails, fingernails, and soles of the feet, as shown in Figure 1. The presence of lesions on the soles of the feet in males was statistically significant (p = 0.00797). Finally, the laboratory findings revealed that yeasts were the most frequent cause of infection (61.6%), followed by dermatophytes (32.7%) and non-dermatophytic filamentous fungi (NDFF; 5.7%), as shown in Table 1. Distribution of the species according to the age of the population revealed that infection by Candidaalbicans was most common in adults between 31 and 40 years old (11.5%) and between 71 and 80 years old (13.6%). However, only infection by Epidermophyton floccosum in adults between 71 and 80 years old was found to be statistically significant (p = 0.0413). Distribution of the species according to anatomical location showed that infection by C. albicans was the most frequent in toenails (28.9%), but only infection by C. albicans in fingernails was statistically significant (p = 0.0412). Of the samples whose cultures were positive for Candida spp., 60% were positive by direct examination (50.5% positive for C. albicans and 9.5% for Candida guilliermondii) and 40% negative by direct examination in two samples collected consecutively (of these 27.6% were positive for C. albicans, 6.2% for Candida krusei, 3.1% for C. guilliermondii, and 3.1% for Candida tropicalis). With regard to predisposing factors for infection, 20 patients (50%) cited contact with animals, and 5 (12.5%) had handled soil. However, no correlation was found between predisposing factors and the occurrence of infection.

Figure 1. Distribution by gender of the anatomical location of the infection.

Discussion

Based on the IBGE (Brazilian Institute for Geography and Statistics) estimate for the total population of São Bernardo in 2005 of 788,560, our population (191 patients) represents just 0.02% of this figure. We believe that this rate of fungal infection must be below the real rate because some patients do not seek medical assistance and others use different public or private health services13 (the present study was carried out in just one location). The finding of 52 positive samples (19%) correlates with other studies, in which incidences of 16.5%13, 20.8%12, and 22.8%3 of the study populations were reported. However, the frequency of exposure to predisposing factors and variations in population distribution over the years should be taken into account before establishing a relationship between gender and susceptibility to infection. It should be noted that 12 patients were infected in more than one anatomical location, a finding that can be accounted for by dissemination of the infection to different sites by self-inoculation or by the appearance of new lesions by repeated infections because of a permanent source of contamination10.

Of the samples that yielded positive cultures, 37 (71%) revealed fungal elements on direct examination. In a recent review of the literature, Siqueira et al17 found rates of 35.6%, 66.7%, and 70.4% cited for both a positive direct examination and a positive culture. It should be stressed that diagnosis based on direct microscopic observation of samples alone has a number of limitations, such as low sensitivity, the fact that it is nearly always impossible to identify the fungal species, and the inability to perform antifungal sensitivity testing15.

With regard to the anatomical localization of the lesions, the results agree with the results of studies by Crocco et al4, who considered the higher prevalence of onychomycosis in females to be the result of greater trauma, continued exposure to water, or irritation as a result of contact with chemical substances. In our study we also observed a higher rate of infection in toenails, a finding that can be explained by the slow growth of these nails compared to that of fingernails (fingernails: 3-4 mm/month vs. toenails: 1.5-2 mm/month) and their greater exposure to trauma1. Toenail onychomycosis can cause pain and discomfort, making it difficult to practice sports, walk, or even stand. This infection can also result in significant damage to general health, physical appearance, and social performance. In males, the higher prevalence of infection in the soles of the feet can also be attributed to the greater frequency with which males practice sports, greater occlusion by shoes, and a lack of attention to foot hygiene.

The predominance of yeasts (61.6%) followed by dermatophytes (32.7%) and NDFF (5.7%) in this study agrees with studies in which these three types of fungi were identified as the causative agents of many cutaneous mycoses in humans, particularly onychomycosis. However, there are striking geographic differences in the epidemiology and etiology of onychomycosis, especially the prevalence of the infections caused by each group of fungi7. Yeasts are often secondary pathogens4 and cause infections when they find conditions that favor growth, such as constant humidity, contamination that can occur when women are performing personal hygiene11 or the immunodeficiency16 that can follow hormonal variations in female patients. NDFF other than Scytalidium species are variously said to cause between 0% and 50% of all toenail onychomycoses, although most estimates are in the 2-5% range18.

Several studies on the efficacy of antifungal agents in onychomycosis have been published. These, together with the fact that different agents have different response rates to treatment, have led to increasing recognition of the importance of rigorous study design and reporting and the subsequent improvement in the quality of studies in this field7.

In conclusion, our findings showed that yeasts were the predominant cause of infection in our study population, and are in agreement with other studies that reported varying frequencies and prevalence according to the country or the regions in a particular country. Many studies on this subject have been carried out to date. The present study shows, however, that there is an increasing prevalence of yeasts as etiologic agents of dermatomycosis.

Acknowledgments

To Dr. Luiz G. Filho, Dra. Fátima T. Reis, Dra. Amélia R.M. Akabane, Dra. Lúcia Morilhara, Dr. Sebastião N. Travassos, Dr. Marcus V.G. Buissa, Dr. Willian Buissa, and the staff of the Clínica Municipal de Especialidades Médicas and the Universidade Metodista de São Paulo.


* Corresponding author.

E-mail address:marta.souza@metodista.br (M.C. Souza).

ARTICLE INFO

Article history:

Received November 6, 2007

Accepted December 2, 2008

Bibliography
[1]
Araújo AJ.G, Bastos OM.P, Souza MA.J, Oliveira JC..
Ocorrência de onicomicose em pacientes atendidos em consultórios dermatológicos da cidade do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
An Bras Dermatol, 78 (2003), pp. 299-308
[2]
Barnett HL, Hunter BB..
Illustrated genera of imperfect fungi, 4th ed.
, APS Press (St Paul Minnesota), pp. 1998
[3]
Costa M, Passos XS, Souza LK.H, Miranda AT.B, Lemos JA, Júnior JG.O, Silva MRR..
Epidemiologia e etiologia das dermatofitoses em Goiânia, GO, Brasil.
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop, 35 (2002), pp. 19-22
[4]
Crocco EI, Mimica LM.J, Muramatu LH, Garcia C, Souza VM, Ruiz LR.B, Zaitz C..
Identificação de espécies de Candida e susceptibilidade antifúngica in vitro: estudo de 100 pacientes com candidíases superficiais.
An Bras Dermatol, 79 (2004), pp. 689-697
[5]
Escobar ML, Carmona-Fonseca J..
Onicomicosis por hongos ambientales no dermatofíticos.
Rev Iberoam Micol, 20 (2003), pp. 6-10
[6]
Game MA, Owen WC, Mitchell DK..
Cutaneous manifestations of disseminated fungal infection in an immunocompromised child.
J Pediatr, 133 (1998), pp. 466-468
[7]
Godoy P, Nunes F, Silva V, Tomimori-Yamashita J, Zaror L, Fischman O..
Onychomycosis caused by Fusarium solani and Fusarium oxysporum in São Paulo, Brazil.
Mycopathology, 157 (2004), pp. 287-290
[8]
Gupta AK, Ryder JE, Bluhm R, Johnson A, Summerbell RC..
Onychomycosis: quality of studies.
J Cutan Med Surg, 7 (2003), pp. 312-316
[9]
Lacaz CS, Porto E, Martins JE.C, Vaccari EM.H, Melo NT..
Tratado de micologia médica. 9.
ª ed, 2002. p. 1104 (São Paulo: Sarvier),
[10]
Larruskain J, Pineiro L, Idigoras P, Pérez-Trallero E..
Dermatofitosis con lesiones concurrentes a distancia: importancia pronóstica y terapéutica.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin, 23 (2005), pp. 191-193
[11]
Luque AG, Ramos LL, Susana LA, Riccomi AE..
Estudio micológico de 100 casos de lesiones ungueales de la ciudad de Rosario - República Argentina.
Rev Iberoam Micol, 14 (1997), pp. 164-167
[12]
Mazón A, Salvo S, Vives R, Valcayo A, Sabalza MA..
Estudio etiológico y epidemiológico de las dermatofitosis en Navarra (España).
Rev Iberoam Micol, 14 (1997), pp. 65-68
[13]
Padilla A, Sampedro A, Sampedro P, Delgado V..
Estudio clínico y epidemiológico de las dermatofitosis en una Zona Básica de Salud de Jaén (España).
Rev Iberoam Micol, 19 (2002), pp. 36-39
[14]
Palacio A, Cuétara MS, Valle A, González A, Almondarain I, Castillo MJ.R, Vasallo AM, Miguens MP..
Cambios epidemiológicos observados en un decenio en las dermatofitosis del hospital universitario 12 de Octubre de Madrid: nuevas especies emergentes.
Rev Iberoam Micol, 16 (1999), pp. 101-106
[15]
Pontón J..
Diagnóstico microbiológico de las micosis.
Rev Iberoam Micol, 19 (2002), pp. 25-29
[16]
Sidrim JJ.C, Rocha MFG..
Micologia médica à luz de autores contemporâneos.
, 2004. p. 93-95 (Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan),
[17]
Siqueira ER, Ferreira JC, Maffei CM.L, Candido RC..
Ocorrência de dermatófitos em amostras de unhas, pés e mãos coletadas de estudantes universitários.
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop, 39 (2006), pp. 269-271
[18]
Summerbell RC, Cooper E, Bunn U, Jamieson F, Gupta AK..
Onychomycosis: a critical study of techniques and criteria for confirming the etiologic significance of nondermatophytes.
Med Mycol, 43 (2005), pp. 39-59
[19]
Virgili A, Zampino MR, Mantovani L..
Fungal skin infections in organ transplant recipients.
Am J Clin Dermatol, 3 (2002), pp. 19-35
Opciones de artículo