metricas
covid
Buscar en
Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica
Toda la web
Inicio Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica Clonal diversity among Burkholderia cepacia complex isolates from cystic fibrosi...
Información de la revista
Vol. 31. Núm. 10.
Páginas 665-668 (diciembre 2013)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Visitas
3836
Vol. 31. Núm. 10.
Páginas 665-668 (diciembre 2013)
Brief report
Acceso a texto completo
Clonal diversity among Burkholderia cepacia complex isolates from cystic fibrosis patients in a reference unit
Diversidad clonal en aislamientos de Burkholderia cepacia complex de pacientes con fibrosis quística en una unidad de referencia
Visitas
3836
Laura Barradoa, M. Teresa Martinezb, Jennifer Villaa, M. Ángeles Orellanaa, Esther Viedmaa, Fernando Chavesa,
Autor para correspondencia
a Servicio de Microbiología Clínica, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
b Unidad de Fibrosis Quística, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Resumen
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Tablas (2)
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of patients with Burkholderia cepacia complex infection at time of acquisition and one year after the first isolation.
Table 2. Distribution of Burkholderia cepacia complex species according to the PFGE patterns, sequence types and antimicrobial resistance patterns.
Mostrar másMostrar menos
Abstract
Introduction

The epidemiology of Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) in cystic fibrosis (CF) is not widely known.

Methods

All CF patients with Bcc between 2002 and 2011 were reviewed, and a molecular analysis of isolates was performed.

Results

The prevalence of Bcc infection was 7.2% (18/250). Molecular analysis of 16 Bcc isolates showed 5 species (7 B. contaminans, 6 B. cepacia, 1 B. cenocepacia, 1 B. multivorans, and 1 B. stabilis) and 13 sequence types. There were no cases of cross-transmission.

Conclusion

A high diversity of Bcc species was found in infected CF patients.

Keywords:
Burkholderia cepacia complex
Cystic fibrosis
Molecular epidemiology
Resumen
Introducción

La epidemiología de Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) en fibrosis quística (FQ) no es bien conocida.

Métodos

Se revisaron todos los pacientes con Bcc entre 2002-2011. Se realizó análisis molecular de los aislamientos.

Resultados

La prevalencia fue de 7.2% (18/250). El análisis molecular de 16 aislamientos representativos mostró 5 especies (7 B. contaminans, 6 B. cepacia, 1 B. cenocepacia, 1 B. multivorans, and 1 B. stabilis), y 13 tipos de secuencia. No hubo casos de transmisión cruzada.

Conclusiones

Se encontró una alta diversidad de especies de Bcc causantes de infecciones en FQ.

Palabras clave:
Burkholderia cepacia complex
Fibrosis quística
Epidemiología molecular
Texto completo
Introduction

Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) is a closely related group of 17 bacterial species with similar phenotype but different genotype.1 Colonization with Bcc is associated with a constant and accelerated decline in lung function and increased risk of death in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. Particular species of the Bcc such as Burkholderia cenocepacia and Burkholderia multivorans have been associated with an increased transmission risk and virulence, and with a worse outcome following lung transplantation.2

In Spain, the prevalence of chronic Bcc infection in CF patients in 2009 was 3.5% (data collected from only 30% of the total CF population in Spain).3 The distribution of Bcc species for this population is not well established, except for a recent report stating that B. cenocepacia was the most prevalent genomovar found in patients with CF (19.1%).4 An increase in the number of CF Bcc cases in our center was identified during 2009–2010, for which, a decision was taken to investigate the clinical characteristics of CF patients with Bcc, the distribution of Bcc species, and the possibility of cross-transmission among the patients treated in our CF unit.

Methods

A retrospective study was performed on all CF patients colonized/infected with Bcc isolates from January 2002 to December 2011 treated in the CF unit of the Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre (Madrid). Clinical records were reviewed in order to collect demographic, clinical, and microbiology data. Stringent infection control measures were implemented to reduce cross-transmission, and included hand washing, use of gloves and masks, disposable mouthpieces and antimicrobial filters when a spirometry was performed.

Sputum samples were inoculated onto Columbia 5% blood, MacConkey, mannitol-salt, chocolate, and B. cepacia (BCSA) agar medium. The identification and the susceptibility to different antimicrobials were carried out using the microdilution method (Wider® System, Soria-Melguizo, Spain) and ¿-test strips (AB, Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) for ceftazidime (CAZ), meropenem (MER), levofloxacin (LVX), minocycline (MC), chloramphenicol (CLO) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT). The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were interpreted according to the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute.5

Bcc strains were genotyped by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) with the restriction enzyme XbaI.6 PCR amplification of recA7 gene was used to identify at species level. Multilocus sequence typing8 (MLST) was performed, besides to establish clonality, to confirm the identification. Sequencing reactions were run on an ABI Prism 3100 Genetic Analyzer, obtaining the taxonomic status by sequence analysis using GenBank and the B. cepacia MLST database (http://pubmlst.org/bcc/). Novel alleles and STs were submitted. Univariate analysis was performed by using the t test for continuous variables and the χ2 or Fisher exact tests for categorical variables.

Results

Over the 10-year period of study, 70 Bcc isolates putatively identified by phenotypic methods from 18 CF patients were recovered from a total of 250 patients treated in our CF unit. The prevalence of Bcc infection was 7.2%. Clinical isolates from two patients were not available, and therefore removed from the study. Nine patients were considered as chronically colonized (at least three positive cultures obtained in one year) and seven as sporadically colonized (less than three positive cultures). Ten (62.5%) cases were detected in 2009–2010, and 12 patients (75%) were older than 16 years. Clinical parameters for the 16 Bcc infected patients did not demonstrate any significant trends with body mass index, lung function, hospitalization and antimicrobial usage unchanged after one year of infection (Table 1). We also compared these clinical parameters between chronic and sporadic colonizers, and we could not establish a relationship between Bcc infection and a worse outcome in the lung function, probably because we only analyzed the outcome one year after the first isolation, and this limited the power of this analysis. It should be noted that one patient with chronic ST208 B. cenocepacia infection, had lung transplantation. Following this, the patient had two episodes of cepacia syndrome, and finally, died after 8 months.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of patients with Burkholderia cepacia complex infection at time of acquisition and one year after the first isolation.

Characteristics (n=16)  Time of acquisition  One year later  p 
Mean±SD age (year)  20 (±10.4)  –   
No. female (%)  9 (56.2)  –   
Body mass index (kg/m2)  19.8 (±2.4)  20.4 (±2.5)  0.52 
No. (%) with CF transmembrane regulator mutation type
F508del homozygote  7 (43.7)  –   
F508del heterozygote  6 (33.3)     
Other mutations (G542X/712-1G>T, 1811+1,6kBa, G1244E/1002-2A>G)  3 (16.6)     
No. (%) with:
Pancreatic insufficiency  15 (93.7)  –   
Diabetes mellitus  5 (31.2)  –   
Liver disease  4 (25)  –   
Mean±SD Pulmonary Function (%)a
FEV1  70.7 (±18.7)  68.6 (±3.3)  0.10 
FVC  81.8 (±16.9)  83.5 (±22.1)  0.62 
No. (%) of hospitalized patients  9 (56.2%)  4 (25%)  0.15 
No. (%) with antimicrobial exposure to:b
≥3 groups  8/16 (50)  4/16 (25)  0.27 
1 o 2 groups  7/16 (43.7)  11/16 (68.7)  0.28 
Tobramycin (Inhaled)  9/16 (56.2)  6/16 (37.5)  0.48 
Colistin (Inhaled)  10/16 (62.5)  6/16 (37.5)  0.29 
No. (%) coinfected with other microorganism(s)
Staphylococcus aureus  12 (75)  12 (75)   
Pseudomonas aeruginosa  7 (43.7)  9 (56.2)   
Other nonfermentative Gram-negative bacilli (S. maltophilia, A. xyloxoxidans2 (12.5)  1 (6.2)   
Aspergillus fumigatus  5 (31.2)  2 (12.5)   
Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare  1 (6.2)  1 (6.2)   
a

FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1s; FVC, forced vital capacity.

b

Antimicrobial exposure in the previous year of acquisition and one year after the first isolate. The groups of antimicrobial agents were: β-lactams, macrolides, fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and others.

A total of 41 Bcc isolates phenotypically identified were available for molecular studies: 34 isolates from 9 chronically colonized patients and 7 from 7 sporadically colonized patients. recA PCR-sequencing and MLST were performed in 16 Bcc isolates (one per patient) and showed 5 different species and 13 different sequence types (STs): 6 B. cepacia (ST9, ST717, ST718, ST719, ST720, ST721), 7 B. contaminans (ST102 [2], ST404 [2], ST482, ST716 [2]), 1 B. cenocepacia (ST208), 1 B. multivorans (ST712), and 1 B. stabilis (ST661) (Table 2). Six were novel STs (ST716, ST717, ST718, ST719, ST720, and ST721).

Table 2.

Distribution of Burkholderia cepacia complex species according to the PFGE patterns, sequence types and antimicrobial resistance patterns.

Species no. (%)  ID  Date of the first isolation  PFGE typea  Sequence type  Antimicrobial resistance patternb 
B. cepacia  BCS 15  2003  Oa  ST720  CLO 
6 (37.5%)  BCS 14  2004  Na  ST719  LVX 
  BCS 6  2009  Fa  ST9  CLO 
  BCS 16  2009  Pa  ST721  CLO 
  BCS 12  2010  ST717  – 
  BCS 13  2010  Ma  ST718  – 
B. contaminans  BCS 5  2008  Ea  ST102  – 
7 (43.7%)  BCS 4  2009  ST102  CAZ, MER, LVX, MIN, CLO 
  BCS 11  2009  ST716  LVX, CLO 
  BCS 1  2010  Aa  ST482  LVX 
  BCS 8  2010  ST404  MER, MIN, CLO 
  BCS 9  2010  ST404  MER, CLO 
  BCS 10  2010  ST716  CLO 
B. cenocepacia  BCS 7  2006  Ga  ST208  MER, LVX, SXT 
1 (6.25%)           
B. multivorans  BCS 2  2002  Ba  ST712  MER, LVX, CLO, SXT 
1 (6.25%)           
B. stabilis  BCS 3  2006  ST661  LEV, CLO 
1 (6.25%)           
a

This letter indicates isolates from chronically colonized patients.

b

CLO, chloramphenicol; LVX, levofloxacin; MER, meropenem; MIN, minocycline; CAZ, ceftazidime; SXT, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.

PFGE analysis of the 41 Bcc isolates showed 16 different pulsotypes. Furthermore, those belonging to the same species (B. cepacia and B. contaminans) had different DNA patterns (Table 2). Thirty-four sequential isolates recovered from 9 patients (range 10 months–4 years) were analyzed by PFGE, and all patients harbored the same strain over the time.

The percentages of resistance to antimicrobials were: CAZ (6.2%), MER (31.2%), LVX (37.5%), MC (12.5%), CLO (72.5%) and SXT (12.5%). The MICs were: CAZ (range 1–256μg/ml, MIC90%: 8μg/ml, MIC50%: 4μg/ml), MER (range 0.38–32μg/ml, MIC90%: >32μg/ml, MIC50%: 1.5μg/ml), LVX (range 0.38–32μg/ml, MIC90%: 6μg/ml, MIC50%: 1.5μg/ml), MC (range 0.19–32μg/ml, MIC90%: 6μg/ml, MIC50%: 3μg/ml), CLO (range 0.5–32μg/ml, MIC90%: 32μg/ml, MIC50%: 12μg/ml) and SXT (range 0.047–32μg/ml, MIC90%: 6μg/ml, MIC50%: 0.38μg/ml).

Discussion

This study detected a prevalence of 7.2% of Bcc infection in CF patients. Other European countries and United States have reported rates ranged between 0 and 11.5%.3,9 The most prevalent species were B. contaminans (43.7%) and B. cepacia (37.5%). B. cenocepacia and B. multivorans represented 12.5%. However, other European countries, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and United States, reported rates for B. cepacia between 0 and 11.2%, for B. cenocepacia between 45.1 and 91.8% and for B. multivorans between 0 and 51.6%.10–12 A high clonal diversity was also found in the two more frequent species, B. contaminans and B. cepacia. B. contaminans belonging to ST102 has been involved in a widespread outbreak in the United States and Brazil in non-cystic fibrosis patients.13 In Spain, ST102 has been reported as cause of an outbreak of subclinical mastitis in dairy sheep.1,13,14 The B. cenocepacia isolate of this study did not belong to either the epidemic ET12 strain (ST28) or the Czech strain (ST32), which have been associated with serious outbreaks among patients in Canada and Europe.10 Portugal seems to be the scenario where B. cepacia have been seen to be dominant in CF patients.15 Since the environment will be source of Bcc infection in the absence of strain transmission, then we could speculate that environmental sources of B. cepacia may be more common in Portugal and Spain, and hence lead to it being dominant in CF in these two close countries. Differences in the prevalence of Bcc species, at the regional and local level, may result from a combination of several factors, as genetic diversity among Bcc species living in the natural environment, predominance of epidemic strains (belonging mostly to B. cenocepacia), antimicrobial pressure, and adherence to infection control measures.10

Cases of cross-transmission among CF patients were not found although 62.5% of cases were detected in the last two years of study. Although the increase in 2009–2010 was remarkable, there were not changes in handling, processing or identification procedures in our laboratory that explained the increase in the number of Bcc cases. Probably, it could be related in part to having started to use inhaled colistin in our CF unit from 2005 (data not shown). We also investigated if the Bcc strains could persist in the same patient causing infection. In 9 patients, chronic infection involved a single strain. Bernhardt et al. found that replacement of the initial infecting strain occurred in 6.9% of patients infected with Bcc strains.16

Although our study refers only to a single CF unit, it illustrates the high diversity of Bcc species infecting CF patients. Given the great divergence in the different countries, it is important to know the local epidemiology due to the impact of this information on the clinical management of patients and on the implementation of appropriate infection control policies.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Joaquín R. Otero for reviewing the manuscript.

This study was supported by the Spanish Network for the Research in Infectious Diseases (RD06/0008) from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III and Fundación Mutua Madrileña (FMM 2011/0064).

References
[1]
E. Vanlaere, A. Baldwin, D. Gevers, D. Henry, E. De Brandt, J.J. LiPuma, et al.
Taxon K, a complex within the Burkholderia cepacia complex, comprises at least two novel species, Burkholderia contaminans sp. nov. and Burkholderia lata sp. nov..
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, 59 (2009), pp. 102-111
[2]
J.P. Lynch.
Burkholderia cepacia complex: impact on the cystic fibrosis lung lesion.
Semin Respir Crit Care Med, 30 (2009), pp. 596-610
[3]
Viviani L, Zolin A, Olesen HV. Annual data report 2008–2009 of European Cystic Fibrosis Society Patient Registry. http://www.ecfs.eu/projects/ecfs-patient-registry/annual-reports.
[4]
M.J. Medina-Pascual, S. Valdezate, P. Villalón, N. Garrido, V. Rubio, J.A. Saéz-Nieto.
Identification, molecular characterisation and antimicrobial susceptibility of genomovars of the Burkholderia cepacia complex in Spain.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 31 (2012), pp. 3385-3396
[5]
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS).
Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Twenty-first Informational Supplement. M100-S21.
NCCLS, (2011),
[6]
P. Wigley, N.F. Burton.
Genotypic and phenotypic relationships in Burkholderia cepacia isolated from cystic fibrosis patients and the environment.
J Appl Microbiol, 86 (2009), pp. 460-468
[7]
G.W. Payne, P. Vandamme, S.H. Morgan, J.J. Lipuma, T. Coenye, A.J. Weightman, et al.
Development of a recA gene-based identification approach for the entire Burkholderia genus.
Appl Environ Microbiol, 71 (2005), pp. 3917-3927
[8]
T. Spilker, A. Baldwin, A. Bumford, C.G. Dowson, E. Mahenthiralingam, J.J. LiPuma.
Expanded multilocus sequence typing for Burkholderia species.
J Clin Microbiol, 47 (2009), pp. 2607-2610
[9]
J.J. LiPuma.
The changing microbial epidemiology in cystic fibrosis.
Clin Microbiol Rev, 23 (2010), pp. 299-323
[10]
P. Drevinek, E. Mahenthiralingam.
Burkholderia cenocepacia in cystic fibrosis: epidemiology and molecular mechanisms of virulence.
Clin Microbiol Infect, 16 (2010), pp. 821-830
[11]
T.J. Kidd, J.M. Douglas, H.A. Bergh, C. Coulter, S.C. Bell.
Burkholderia cepacia complex epidemiology in persons with cystic fibrosis from Australia and New Zealand.
Res Microbiol, 159 (2008), pp. 194-199
[12]
D. Crowley, M. Daly, B. Lucey, P. Shine, J.J. Collins, B. Cryan, et al.
Molecular epidemiology of cystic fibrosis-linked Burkholderia cepacia complex isolates from three national referral centres in Ireland.
J Appl Microbiol, 292 (2002), pp. 992-1004
[13]
E. Mahenthiralingam, A. Baldwin, P. Drevinek, E. Vanlaere, P. Vandamme, J.J. LiPuma, et al.
Multilocus sequence typing breathes life into a microbial metagenome.
[14]
E. Berriatua, I. Ziluaga, C. Miguel-Virto, P. Uribarren, R. Juste, S. Laevens, et al.
Outbreak of subclinical mastitis in a flock of dairy sheep associated with Burkholderia cepacia complex infection.
J Clin Microbiol, 39 (2001), pp. 990-994
[15]
C.P. Coutinho, S.C. Dos Santos, A. Madeira, N.P. Mira, A.S. Moreira, I. Sá-Correia.
Long-term colonization of the cystic fibrosis lung by Burkholderia cepacia complex bacteria: epidemiology, clonal variation, and genome-wide expression alterations.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol, 1 (2011), pp. 12
[16]
S.A. Bernhardt, T. Spilker, T. Coffey, J.J. LiPuma.
Burkholderia cepacia complex in cystic fibrosis: frequency of strain replacement during chronic infection.
Clin Infect Dis, 37 (2003), pp. 780-785
Copyright © 2013. Elsevier España, S.L.. All rights reserved
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos