metricas
covid
Buscar en
Annals of Hepatology
Toda la web
Inicio Annals of Hepatology Relationship between sarcopenia and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic l...
Journal Information
Vol. 29. Issue 6. (In progress)
(November - December 2024)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Visits
151
Vol. 29. Issue 6. (In progress)
(November - December 2024)
Original article
Full text access
Relationship between sarcopenia and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD): A systematic review and meta-analysis
Visits
151
Adnan Malika,
Corresponding author
, Sadia Javaidb, Muhammad Imran Malikc, Shahbaz Qureshia
a Mountain Vista Medical Center, Mesa Arizona, USA
b Medigan Army Medical Center WA, USA
c Airedale general hospital, West Yorkshire, England
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (6)
Show moreShow less
Tables (2)
Table 1. Summary of the included studies.
Table 2. Baseline characteristics of the included studies.
Show moreShow less
Additional material (1)
Abstract
Introduction and Objectives

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) formerly known as Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a common chronic disease. Identifying MASLD risk factors could help early intervention and reduce the burden of the disease. Previous studies investigated the association between sarcopenia and NAFLD. Several trials were published after the last meta-analysis with indecisive results. This is an updated meta-analysis which aims to assess the association between sarcopenia, MASLD, and MASLD-related fibrosis.

Materials and Methods

Relevant trials published on PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases until October 2022 were included. We included studies in which skeletal mass index (SMI) or sarcopenia was compared between patients with and without NAFLD now MASLD. Also, studies comparing fibrosis between MASLD patients with and without sarcopenia were included. Data were pooled as odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) using Review Manager Software.

Results

A total of 25 studies were included. The incidence of sarcopenia was significantly higher in MASLD than controls (OR, 1.25; 95 % CI, 1.08-1.44; P = 0.003). SMI odds showed no significant difference between MASLD patients and controls (OR, 1.02; 95 % CI, 0.91-1.15; P = 0.7). MASLD patients with sarcopenia had higher odds of fibrosis than MASLD patients without sarcopenia (OR, 1.49; 95 % CI, 1.03-2.14; P = 0.03).

Conclusions

Sarcopenia increased MASLD's probability and was associated with a higher probability of liver fibrosis in MASLD patients. However, SMI had no predictive value of MASLD occurrence.

Keywords:
NAFLD
Fatty liver
Sarcopenia
SMI
Fibrosis
Abbreviations:
Metabolic Dysfunction Associated Steatotic Liver Disease
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis
Odds Ratio
body mass index
skeletal muscle index
Aspartate aminotransferase
Alanine aminotransferase
and gamma-glutamyl transferase
and confidence interval
are all
Full Text
1Introduction

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) formerly known as non alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) occurs due to excessive hepatic fat accumulation in obese patients in the absence of alcohol use [1–4]. It is associated with insulin resistance and other metabolic disorders including diabetes, dyslipidemia and hypertension [1]. NAFLD is diagnosed when fatty changes in the liver occur in the absence of heavy alcohol consumption. In the United States, it is observed in 31 % of adults as well as in 33 % of potential live liver donors noted on liver biopsy [4].

MASLD's pathophysiology is influenced by diet, lifestyle, and inflammation, which directly affects the severity of MASLD's clinicopathologic outcome [5]. The precise pathophysiology and factors causing progressive hepatocellular damage after triglyceride accumulation are unknown; however, it appears that changes in local and systemic factors (particularly insulin resistance) regulate the balance between hepatic lipid influx or synthesis and their export or oxidation, leading to hepatic triglyceride accumulation [1,6]. The pathophysiology of MASLD is influenced by circulating lipids and the various compounds released from adipose, muscle, and liver tissues, as well as pancreatic and gut hormones [5].

MASLD therapy's main aim is to slow the disease's development and prevent liver-related illness and death [7]. There is currently no cure for MASLD, but a variety of medications−including the treatment of high blood pressure, high cholesterol, type 2 diabetes, and obesity−can help slow down the disease progression [8]. Some measures for lowering MASLD risk include losing weight, maintaining a healthy diet, exercising regularly, and quitting smoking [8].

Sarcopenia is a disorder characterized by a widespread progressive loss of skeletal muscle mass and strength, leading to physical and psychological deterioration and, eventually death. Although sarcopenia is more likely to affect the elderly, its onset can occur early in association with other disorders affecting younger patients [9].

Multiple combined factors, including age, gender, and level of physical activity, predispose to sarcopenia development [9]. Its prevalence ranges from 5–13 percent in people 60–70 years old, while the prevalence ranges from 11 to 50 percent in people >80 years old [9].

Sarcopenia's etiopathogenesis is not well understood. Resistance exercise is particularly effective at slowing the age-related loss of skeletal muscle, and age, gender, and level of physical activity are all well-known risk factors for sarcopenia. Obesity, osteoporosis, type 2 diabetes, and insulin resistance are all serious sarcopenia co-morbidities [9].

MASLD and sarcopenia have several risk factors in common [10], of which suggest a possible association between the two conditions. By revising the current literature, we noticed some conflict between the different studies’ results regarding the relationship between sarcopenia and MASLD and the impact of MASLD on the skeletal mass of patients with sarcopenia [11–34]. The exact relation between MASLD and sarcopenia is not fully established yet. Hence we aimed to assess the association between sarcopenia, MASLD, and MASLD-related fibrosis by summarizing the data of 25 studies.

2Materials and methods

This study was conducted in strict accordance with the “Preferred items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses” (PRISMA) guidelines [35].

2.1Search strategy and data collection

We conducted our search on four electronic databases: PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science (WOS), and Scopus, for all published clinical trials till October 2022. The search was conducted using the following keywords: “Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver,” “NAFLD,” “Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver,” “Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver,” “Nonalcoholic Fatty Livers,” “Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis,” “Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitides,” “Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis,” “non-alcoholic steatohepatitis,” “NASH,” “Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver,” “Skeletal Muscle,” “Skeletal Muscles,” “Sarcopenia.” We removed the duplicates using Endnote software, and then we screened all retrieved citations for eligibility in two steps; titles and abstracts screening and full texts screening, and studies that matched our criteria were included in our study. We manually screened the references of the included studies for any missed relevant papers.

2.2Selection criteria

We included prospective and retrospective studies and cross-sectional that assessed the association between sarcopenia and NAFLD or NAFLD-related fibrosis (now MASLD). No restrictions for age, sex, site, or publication date were applied. We excluded animal studies, non-English studies, non-available studies, thesis, reviews, and if the abstract only is available.

2.3Data extraction

At least two independent reviewers did the data extraction and any discrepancies were solved by discussion. The extracted data were related to the following [1]: Summary of the included trials, including study arms, patients’ number, total sample, method of MASLD diagnosis, and the study conclusion [2]; baseline characteristics of the enrolled population, including the number of patients in each group, age, body mass index (BMI), percentage of sarcopenic patients, skeletal muscle index (SMI), smoking percentage in the study population, total cholesterol level, triglyceride level, and aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) levels [3]; outcomes [4]; quality assessment domains.

2.4Study outcomes

We compared the odds of both sarcopenia and low SMI in MASLD patients with non-MASLD controls. In addition, we compared the odds of MASLD-related fibrosis in MASLD patients with and without sarcopenia. While extracting data, crude analysis results were extracted when available. Otherwise, model-one-adjusted results were extracted.

2.5Quality assessment

We used the NIH tool for observational and cross-sectional studies to assess the quality of included studies [36]. The tool includes 14 questions for the judgment of each study. These questions comprise judgment of the research question clarity, study population specification, participation rate, pre-specification and application of the study inclusion and exclusion criteria, sample size justification and power, measurement of the exposures prior to the outcomes, sufficient timeframe, examination of different levels of exposures, reliability, and consistency of exposure measurements, multiple exposure assessments overtime, reliability, and consistency of outcome measurements, blinding of the outcome assessor, loss of follow-up percentage, and statistical adjustment of the critical potential confounding variables between exposures and outcomes.

2.6Statistical analysis

Analyses were conducted using the Review Manager Software (version 5.4). Outcomes were pooled as odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) using the generic inverse-variance method under the random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed by chi-square and I-Square tests. If I-Square: 0 % to 40 %, it may not be important, 30 % to 60 % show moderate heterogeneity, 50 % to 90 % show substantial heterogeneity, and 75 % to 100 % show a considerable level of heterogeneity. Also, we considered heterogeneity to be significant if at chi-square P-value <0.1 and I2 >50 % [37]. Heterogeneity was solved, when possible, by performing a sensitivity analysis. We also used Review Manager Software (version 5.4) to do the sensitivity analysis according to the definition of sarcopenia in each study. According to Egger's funnel-plot-based methods, publication bias was assessed for outcomes reported by more than ten studies [38]. Publication bias was assessed by visual inspection of the funnel plot.

3Results3.1Literature search results

Our search results retrieved 1941 records from all searched databases. After removing duplications, 1756 records were identified. By title and abstract screening, we excluded 1673 records, and the remaining 83 were eligible for full-text screening. We finally included 25 prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional studies in the analysis. Figure 1 shows the flow of data collection and screening process (PRISMA flow diagram).

Fig. 1.

The PRISMA flow chart summarizing the literature search, and study selection process.

(0.42MB).
3.2Characteristics of the included studies

The included studies varied in their design and patients' age, gender distribution, BMI, lipid profile, and liver enzymes. Mean age ranged from 10 to 70 years, mean BMI ranged from 21 to 34 kg/m2, and male percentage ranged from less than 1 % to 94 %. The mean total cholesterol level went from 175 to 225 mg/dl; the mean triglyceride level ranged from 95 to 224 mg/dl, the mean AST level ranged from 20 to 72 IU/L; the mean ALT level ranged from 13 to 63 IU/L, and mean GGT ranged from 21.2 to 98 IU/L. Ultrasonography was used for MASLD diagnosis in most studies. A summary of the included studies and baseline characteristics of enrolled subjects are shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectively.

Table 1.

Summary of the included studies.

ID  Design  NAFLD diagnosis  Sample size  Conclusion 
Alferink 2019  Cross sectional  499  SMI was associated with less NAFLD in normal weight women. 
Bhanji 2019  Retrospective Cohort  Biopsy  265  Sarcopenia and frailty occur with differing prevalence, with variable impact on outcomes in waitlisted patients with NASH and ALD 
Choe 2018  Cross sectional  US  487  Low skeletal muscle mass, which was precisely measured by CT, is independently associated with NAFLD, suggesting that sarcopenia is a risk factor for NAFLD. 
Chung 2019  Retrospective cohort  US  5989  Sarcopenia was significantly associated with the presence and the severity of ultrasonography graded NAFLD in our study population independent of visceral fatness and another metabolic confounder. 
Gan 2019  Prospective cohort  3536  Low muscle mass and low muscle strength were positively and independently associated with NAFLD. 
Golabi 2020  Prospective cohort  FLI > 60  4611  Inactivity is associated with presence of sarcopenia, whilst sarcopenia is associated with increased mortality amongst NAFLD patients. Sarcopenia should be a part of clinical assessment of patients with NAFLD. 
Hashimoto 2016  Cross sectional  Electrography  79  SMI was negatively associated with hepatic steatosis in men with type 2 diabetes. 
Hong 2014  Prospective cohort  US  452  Individuals with lower muscle mass exhibited increased risk of NAFLD. This result may provide a novel insight into the mechanism linking between sarcopenia and NAFLD 
Hong 2020  Cross sectional  US  850  Sarcopenia was associated with an increased risk for NAFLD in patients with COPD, independent of age, sex, lung function, and metabolic factors. 
Hsieh 2020  Prospective cohort  US  521  Muscle alterations and visceral adiposity assessed by CT are associated with significant fibrosis in NAFLD 
Kang 2019  Cross sectional  CT  10711  Low skeletal muscle mass is associated with advanced fibrosis in NAFLD patients independent of metabolic risk factors. 
Kang 2020  Cross sectional  US  443  The prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver in inflammatory bowel disease patients was 11.1 % and sarcopenia was an independent risk factor. 
Kim 2016  Cross sectional  CT  1184  Low SMI is associated with the risk of fatty liver index (FLI) defined NAFLD independent of other well-known metabolic risk factors in both genders. 
Koo 2017  Prospective cohort  Biopsy  309  Sarcopenia was significantly associated with NASH and significant fibrosis. 
Kwon 2020  Cross sectional  US  126  NAFLD is significantly associated with relatively low SMM in non-obese children and adolescents. Increasing SMM, such as weight training, can be suggested as one of the treatment strategies in pediatric NAFLD without obesity. 
Lee 2015  Cross sectional  NFS  10479  Sarcopenia is associated with increased risks of NAFLD and advanced fibrosis, independent of obesity or metabolic control. 
Lee 2016  Retrospective cohort  NFS  2761  Sarcopenia is associated with significant liver fibrosis in subjects with NAFLD, and the association is independent of obesity and insulin resistance. 
Lee 2021  Longitudinal cohort  NFS  9691  LSMI and NAFLD showed a relationship. Maintaining muscle mass should be emphasized in the management of NAFLD. 
Pacifico 2020  Longitudinal cohort  US  159  There was an association between low muscle mass and NAFLD/NASH in overweight/obese youths. 
Peng 2019  Cross sectional  US  1949  NAFLD is associated with a lower risk of sarcopenia when using the height adjusted SMI. In contrast, it showed the opposite result when using the weight adjusted SMI. 
Petta 2017  Prospective cohort  US  225  In Western patients with NAFLD, with high prevalence of metabolic disorders and advanced liver disease, sarcopenia was associated with the severity of fibrosis and steatosis, independently of hepatic and metabolic risk factors. 
Seo 2019  Cross sectional  US  2160  Sarcopenia is independently associated with NAFLD in men with T2DM, which suggests that sarcopenia may be a risk factor for NAFLD in men with T2DM 
Su 2019  Cross sectional  US  236  T2DM patients who have lower SVR levels are associated with higher risks of developing the NAFLD-related complications. Besides, SVR shows independent correlation with NAFLD in female T2DM patients, suggesting that SVR may be a useful index to predict the high risk of hepatic steatosis in T2DM. 
Wang 2021  Cross sectional  US  486  The occurrence of sarcopenia was associated with a higher risk of NAFLD, especially in men, as demonstrated by lower muscle mass and lower muscle strength. 
Wijarnpreecha 2019  Cross sectional  Biopsy  11325  Sarcopenia was independently associated with increased odds of NAFLD and NAFLD-associated advanced fibrosis independent of well-defined risk factors. 

Ultrasonography (US), Fatty liver index (FLI), Computerized tomography (CT), NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS), systemic vascular resistance (SVR)

Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD), Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH), Alcoholic Liver diseases (ALD)

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D), Skeletal Muscle Mass Index (SMI), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases (COPD)

Table 2.

Baseline characteristics of the included studies.

ID  Arms  Number of the patient  Sarcopenic patients (%)  Age in years Mean (SD)  Male (%)  BMI (Kg/m2) Mean (SD)  SMI (Kg/m2)  Smoking, n (%)  Total cholesterol, mg/dL  Triglycerides, mg/dL  Aspartate aminotransferase (IU/L) Mean (SD)  Alanine aminotransferase (IU/L)Mean (SD)  Gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) (IU/L)Mean (SD) 
Alferink 2019NAFLD (+)  67  16.70 %  7.43 (0.74) 
NAFLD (-)  432  20.90 %  7.41 (0.69)   
Bhanji 2019NAFLD (+)  136  22 %  60.2 (7.8)  52 %  34.9 (8.0) 
NAFLD (-)  129  47 %  53.7 (10.1)  69 %  27.6 (5.1) 
Choe 2018NAFLD (+)  184  58.1 (9.2)  73.40 %  27.0 (1.8)  7.4 (0.7)  11%  191.3 (33.7)  95.7 (55.4)  25.4 (8.6)  30.7 (16.3)  42.5 (36.1) 
NAFLD (-)  303  53.5 (9.0)  94.10 %  26.6 (1.5)  9.3 (0.8)  4.10%  200 (36.9)  109 (65.3)  25.4 (19.3)  29.8 (23.0)  43.4 (39.6) 
Chung 2019NAFLD (+)  315  69.50 %  57.1 (11.4)  73.00 %  27.8 (3.6)  28.8 (13.4)  35.9 (23.5)  48.1 (42.7) 
NAFLD (-)  5674  36.50 %  53.0 (9.2)  56.40 %  23.2 (2.8)  25.1 (30.3)  25.8 (35.3)  34.5 (38.7) 
Gan 2019NAFLD (+)  1088  22.61 %  55.20 (11.48)  32.90 %  25.91 (2.86)  26.44 (3.32)  3.12 (0.26)a  3.07 (0.44)a  3.12 (0.62)a 
NAFLD (-)  2448  4.86 %  51.72 (13.66)  26.88 %  22.05 (2.51)  28.47 (3.75)  3.03 (0.26)a  2.74 (0.44)a  2.68 (0.54)a 
Golabi 2020NAFLD (+)  1351  5.10 %  49.04 (0.61)  1.97 %  32.05 (0.22)  – 
NAFLD (-)  3260  3.90 %  43.02 (0.50)  0.92 %  25.63 (0.11) 
Hashimoto 2016NAFLD (+)  58  63.2 (11.7)  58 %  25.7 (4.2)  29.7 (20.7)  36.2 (32.6)  53.1 (53.0) 
NAFLD (-)  21  70.0 (8.4)  21 %  21.4 (2.4)  20.0 (4.3)  16.0 (5.3)  25.3 (16.0) 
Hong 2014NAFLD (+)  128  60 (52.7)  75 %  25.9  33.2  20  18 
NAFLD (-)  324  51 (38, 61)  58.00 %  23.5  40.3  20  17 
Hong 2020NAFLD (+)  124  34.70 %  63.0 (10.2)  66.90 %  27.0 (2.6)  19.6 (4.4)  25.0 (10.8)  33.1 (18.0) 
NAFLD (-)  726  18 %  65.4 (9.5)  68.60 %  22.9 (2.4)  17.8 (3.9)  22.8 (8.0)  19.0 (9.4) 
Hsieh 2020NAFLD (+)  178  58.7 (13.7)  36 %  27.7 (3.9)  47.29 (9.56)  19%  174.9 (40.6)  149.5 (82.5)  71.6 (57.4)  63.8 (47.6)  98.2 (150.5) 
NAFLD (-)  343  49.3 (15.2)  59 %  27.8 (3.8)  50.95 (9.11)  23%  187.6 (39.8)  162.5 (83.5)  41.7 (29.7)  59.9 (56.4)  54.1 (56.3) 
Kang 2019NAFLD (+)  615  52.5 (14.1)  69.90 %  29.1 (3.6)  31.8 (14.4)  41.5 (29.6)  42.51 (40.98) 
NAFLD (-)  10096  47.6 (11.5)  51.80 %  23.6 (2.9)  25.0 (12.8)  26.2 (20.7)  30.0 (33.8) 
Kang 2020NAFLD (+)  49  51.00 %  45.1 (13.6)  63.30 %  23.0 (2.7)  36.70% 
NAFLD (-)  394  33 %  38.6 (15.7)  64.20 %  20.8 (3.3)  7.40% 
Kim 2016NAFLD (+)  208  44.0 (1.1)  28.0 (0.3)  29.8 (0.2)  203.5 (3.1)  224.3  26.8  36.1  58.1 
NAFLD (-)  976  43.2 (0.8)  23.3 (0.1)  32.4 (0.1)  180.7 (1.4)  100.9  20.9  20.5  25.7 
Koo 2017NAFLD (+)  70  54.9 (17.0)  44.30 %  30.2 (4.0)  21.40%  178.6 (35.3)  121  36  41  53 
NAFLD (-)  239  52.5 (13.2)  47.70 %  26.0 (3.0)  23%  187.5 (40.7)  133  32  34  41 
Kwon 2020NAFLD (+)  53  10.8 (1.3)  62.30 %  21.5 (1.3)  33.7 (19.2)  45.6 (42.9) 
NAFLD (-)  73  -  10.8 (1.4)  54.80 %  21.0 (1.5)  19.5 (3.4)  13.3 (4.2) 
Lee 2015NAFLD (+)  2004  56.7 (16.3)  65 %  22.8 (1.6)  26.5 (3.3)  193.3 (36.4)  134.3 (85.9)  21.5 (7.5)  19.9 (12.1) 
NAFLD (-)  8475  47.9 (16.8)  65 %  21.6 (2.1)  31.1 (4.1)  182.8 (34.0)  20.7 (9.2)  17.9 ± 11.5 
Lee 2016NAFLD (+)  337  65.5 (11.8)  61 %  27.1 (3.3)  25.7 (11.1)  27.8 (18.6)  46.8 (52.8) 
NAFLD (-)  2424  54.5 (14.1)  54 %  25.7 (3.1) 
Lee 2021NAFLD (+)  4168  51.2 (11.5)  65.50 %  26.1 (3.5)  22.70%  208.3 (41.2)  141  27  29 (20, 41) 
NAFLD (-)  5523  47.4 (13.1)  37.60 %  22.5 (3.0)  13.30%  201.8 (36.3)  88  24  18 (13, 25) 
Pacifico 2020NAFLD (+)  78  55.20 %  11.3 (2.3)  48.70 %  28.3 (4.5)  25  25 
NAFLD (-)  81  33.30 %  12.5 (3.0)  75.30 %  24.6 (3.3)  23  20 
Peng 2019NAFLD (+)  480  66.63 (4.31)  49.80 %  30.80%  225.20 (42.4) 
NAFLD (-)  1469  66.74 (4.34)  46.70 %  43.30% 
Petta 2017NAFLD (+)  98  52.5 (12.4)  40.80 %  33.4 (5.1)  196.3 (45.7)  146.0 (69.7) 
NAFLD (-)  127  45.0 (13.3)  34.60 %  27.8 (3.8)  200.3 (44.4)  139.8 (75.3) 
Seo 2019NAFLD (+)  1475  56.6 (11.1)  68.30 %  23.9 (2.7)  29.1 (20.6)  29.2 (22.6)  29.2 (22.1) 
NAFLD (-)  685  53.1 (11.7)  31.70 %  26.6 (3.1)  148 (40)  204 (160)  29 (20)  29 (22)  29.2 (22.1) 
Su 2019NAFLD (+)  89  59.4 (9.8)  37.7 %  26.2 (3.4)  43.80%  177.9 (54.1)  203.7 (194.9)  25.4 (11.5)  28.5 (18.2) 
NAFLD (-)  147  57.6 (9.4)  62.30 %  23.0 (2.9)  44.20%  162.4 (42.5)  124 (79.7)  22.6 (10.5)  24.2 (14.5) 
Wang 2021NAFLD (+)  124  0.153 %  67.5 (10.1)  24.7 (2.8)  26.1 (7.2)  24.5 (14.6)  28.4 ± 18.4 
NAFLD (-)  362  0.08 &  62.9 (12.1)  22.5 (2.6)  21.3 (6.0)  17.6 (10.2)  21.2 ± 16.8 
Wijarnpreecha 2019NAFLD (+)  4188  48.30 %  45.4 (0.43)  50.40 %  28.98 (0.22)  29.80%  208.7 (1.45)  179.5 (3.60)  23.0 (0.28)  21.6 (0.59) 
NAFLD (-)  7137  10.30 %  41.3 (0.45)  45.40 %  25.49 (0.11)  22.50%  201.5 (0.88)  118.1(2.13)  15.4 (0.29)  19.8 (0.17) 
a

These data are log transformed.

3.3Quality assessment results

According to the NIH tool for quality assessment, the overall risk of bias revealed a fair quality of most included studies and a good quality of four included studies. Details of each study domain judgment are shown in supplementary Table 1.

3.4Outcomes3.4.1Sarcopenia (Fig. 2)

The total estimate showed that MASLD was significantly associated with sarcopenia (OR = 1.25; 95 % CI [1.08, 1.44]; P = 0.003) [11–13,15,16,18,21,23,25–27,29,32,33]. The pooled studies were heterogenous (P < 0.00001, I2 = 63 %). The heterogeneity was best resolved by conducting subgroup analysis according to the definition of sarcopenia in each study, whether depending on body weight, height, body mass index (BMI), or other variables.

Fig. 2.

A forest plot comparing the odds of sarcopenia in NAFLD patients with the controls.

(0.79MB).

In the subgroup defining sarcopenia depending on body weight, MASLD was significantly associated with sarcopenia (OR = 1.29; 95 % CI [1.07, 1.56]; P = 0.007 [11,13,15,21],) and the pooled studies were homogenous (P = 0.99, I2 = 0 %). While MASLD was not associated with sarcopenia in the subgroup defining sarcopenia depending on height (OR = 0.92; 95 % CI: [0.81, 1.03], P = 0.15) [13,21], The pooled studies were homogenous (P = 0.66, I2 = 0 %). Also, MASLD was not associated with sarcopenia in the subgroup defining sarcopenia depending on BMI (OR = 1.31; 95 %CI: [0.99, 1.73], P = 0.06). The pooled studies were homogenous (P = 0.99, I2 = 0 %) [11,15,21]. For publication bias assessment, visual inspection of the funnel plot showed an asymmetrical distribution of the included studies around the effect estimate in the direction of large SE, suggesting the presence of publication bias (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

A funnel plot for publication bias assessment in sarcopenia.

(0.07MB).
Fig. 4.

A forest plot comparing the odds of low skeletal mass index in NAFLD patients with the controls.

(0.42MB).
3.4.2Skeletal mass index (SMI) (Fig. 4)

The pooled estimate from nine studies [13,15,17,19,20,24,26,30,31] showed no significant relationship between low SMI and MASLD (OR = 1.02; 95 % CI [0.91, 1.15]; P =0.7). The pooled studies were heterogenous (P < 0.00001; I2 = 70 %). Heterogeneity cannot be solved. The asymmetrical distribution of the included studies around the effect estimate in the direction of large SE in the funnel plot suggests a significant publication bias (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5.

A funnel plot of publication bias assessment in skeletal mass index.

(0.05MB).
Fig. 6.

A forest plot comparing the odds of liver fibrosis in sarcopenic NAFLD patients with the control NAFLD patients.

(0.22MB).
3.4.3Fibrosis (Fig. 6)

The total estimate showed higher odds of liver fibrosis in MASLD patients who had sarcopenia than in NAFLD patients with no sarcopenia (OR = 1.49; 95 % CI [1.03, 2.14]; P = 0.03) [11,14,16,22,25,27,30]. The pooled studies were homogenous (P = 1.00; I2 = 0 %).

4Discussion

Our analysis showed that sarcopenia is associated with a higher probability of developing MASLD. Also, MASLD patients with sarcopenia had a higher probability of liver fibrosis than MASLD patients with no sarcopenia. On the other hand, there was no significant relationship between low SMI values and MASLD.

Multiple cross-sectional observational studies have shown that sarcopenia is linked to an increased risk of MASLD and MASLD-related advanced fibrosis in MASLD patients and that this association is independent of obesity, metabolic syndrome, and insulin resistance [10].

MASLD patients’ liver enzyme levels fluctuate, with typical values present in up to 78 percent of patients at any given time [39,40]. Although liver biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosing MASLD, ultrasonography, CT, and MRI scanning are valuable for detecting moderate to extreme fatty changes in the liver. The fatty liver appears darker and hypodense. The hepatic vessels appear lighter than the rest of the body, and this may be mistaken for contrast injection [41].

The discovery of a correlation between sarcopenia and MASLD could help prevent the disease from worsening. Sarcopenia and MASLD have been linked in several previous studies [42]. In Cruz et al.[43], an association was found between the sarcopenic index and non-alcoholic hepatic steatosis. Our results confirmed these findings after pooling different studies’ results. On the other hand, Gan et al.[26], reported in their cross-sectional that low muscle mass and low muscle strength are independently associated with MASLD. Despite their large sample size, the range of age patients varied from 18 to 80 years, which may have affected the quality of evidence of their study [26]. Also, in the previous meta-analysis by Tovo et al.[44], Sarcopenia was independently associated with MASLD and possibly with advanced fibrosis.

Fibrogenesis in MASLD is a critical process that affects clinical management [45]. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis clinical research network pathology committee developed a staging for MASLD [46]. Four out of 14 features in this staging system take a numerical score as follows: steatosis (0-3), lobular inflammation (0-2), hepatocellular ballooning (0-2), and fibrosis (0-4) [46]. Factors contributing to liver damage include direct cellular injury, cell degeneration and death through apoptosis and other forms of cell death, proinflammatory cytokine expression, hepatic stellate cell activation (HSCs), and irregular wound healing responses leading to fibrosis [47]. An imbalance between pro-oxidant species and antioxidant defense capacities causes oxidative stress. In the setting of hepatic steatosis, an overproduction of toxic lipid metabolites exacerbates oxidative damage to liver cells.

The role of sarcopenia in the development of MASLD may have significant therapeutic consequences in future research. Following our finding that sarcopenic MASLD patients have a higher risk for liver fibrosis, Yu et al.[48], linked sarcopenia to a higher risk of steatohepatitis or advanced liver fibrosis in patients with MASLD. In a biopsy-proven MASLD cohort studied by Koo et al.[11], sarcopenia was linked to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) and severe fibrosis. Besides, low muscle mass has been linked to the histological severity of MASLD [11]. Lee et al. [30] concluded that sarcopenia is associated with significant liver fibrosis.

Sarcopenic patients are evaluated using the skeletal muscle mass index (SMI), which is calculated by dividing the limb skeletal muscle mass (kg) by the square of the patient's height (m2). Men with an SMI < 7.0 kg/m2 and women with an SMI < 5.7 kg/m2 were identified as having low muscle mass [49]. Our analysis showed no significant relationship between the odds of MASLD and SMI values. However, SMI should be considered in the diagnosis of MASLD [50]. In Kim et al. [28] a low SMI was associated with a high risk of MASLD, independent of other well-known metabolic risk factors; however, this link may vary depending on age group or menopausal status. Our results interfere with that of the previous meta-analysis by Cai et al. [51] stating that people with MASLD have a lower SMI than healthy people. More well-designed prospective studies are needed to reinforce the claims and confirm this relationship.

In this meta-analysis, we included many studies with large sample sizes. Included studies were of fair to good quality. At the same time, limitations include the different designs of included studies, the significant heterogeneity that could not be solved in some outcomes, and different definitions of sarcopenia across included studies. Also, our search strategy include studies until October 2022 and the results of crude analyses were not reported by some studies. Also, an age based subgroup analysis was not conducted due to non-uniform age related data reported in included studies.

5Conclusions

In conclusion, sarcopenia raised the risk of MASLD and was linked to a higher risk of liver fibrosis in MASLD patients. However, SMI had no independent predictive value for developing NAFLD.

Authors contributions

Adnan Malik - Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal Analysis, Writing (Original Draft), and Review & Editing; Sadia Javaid - Conceptualization, Data Curation, Writing (Review and Editing); Muhammad Imran Malik - Methodology, Writing (Original Manuscript), and Review and Editing; Shahbaz Qureshi - Supervision, Writing, and Editing the manuscript.

Data availability statement

Data will be available to any researcher who contact the corresponding author.

References
[1]
LA Adams, P Angulo, KD. Lindor.
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
CMAJ, 172 (2005), pp. 899-905
[2]
BA Neuschwander-Tetri.
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
BMC Medicine, 15 (2017),
[3]
JD Browning, LS Szczepaniak, R Dobbins, P Nuremberg, JD Horton, JC Cohen, et al.
Prevalence of hepatic steatosis in an urban population in the United States: impact of ethnicity.
Hepatology, 40 (2004 Dec), pp. 1387-1395
[4]
CK Ryan, LA Johnson, BI Germin, A Marcos.
One hundred consecutive hepatic biopsies in the workup of living donors for right lobe liver transplantation.
Liver Transpl, 8 (2002 Dec), pp. 1114-1122
[5]
S Petta, A Gastaldelli, E Rebelos, E Bugianesi, P Messa, L Miele, et al.
Pathophysiology of non alcoholic fatty liver disease.
Int J Mol Sci, 17 (2016),
[6]
CP Day, OFW. James.
Steatohepatitis: a tale of two “Hits”?.
Gastroenterology, 114 (1998), pp. 842-845
[7]
SR. Mehta.
Review: advances in the treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab, 1 (2010), pp. 101-115
[8]
MD. Beaton.
Current treatment options for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.
Can J Gastroenterol, 26 (2012), pp. 353-357
[9]
V Santilli, A Bernetti, M Mangone, M. Paoloni.
Clinical definition of sarcopenia.
Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab, 11 (2014), pp. 177-180
[10]
AA Li, D Kim, A. Ahmed.
Association of Sarcopenia and NAFLD: An Overview.
Clini Liver Dis, 16 (2020 Aug), pp. 73-76
[11]
BK Koo, D Kim, SK Joo, JH Kim, MS Chang, BG Kim, et al.
Sarcopenia is an independent risk factor for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and significant fibrosis.
J Hepatol, 66 (2017), pp. 123-131
[12]
YH Lee, KS Jung, SU Kim, HJ Yoon, YJ Yun, BW Lee, et al.
Sarcopaenia is associated with NAFLD independently of obesity and insulin resistance: nationwide surveys (KNHANES 2008-2011).
J Hepatol, 63 (2015), pp. 486-493
[13]
TC Peng, LW Wu, WL Chen, FY Liaw, YW Chang, TW. Kao.
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and sarcopenia in a Western population (NHANES III): The importance of sarcopenia definition.
Clin Nutr, 38 (2019), pp. 422-428
[14]
S Petta, S Ciminnisi, V Di Marco, D Cabibi, C Cammà, A Licata, et al.
Sarcopenia is associated with severe liver fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 45 (2017), pp. 510-518
[15]
DH Seo, YH Lee, SW Park, YJ Choi, BW Huh, E Lee, et al.
Sarcopenia is associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in men with type 2 diabetes.
Diabetes Metab, 46 (2020), pp. 362-369
[16]
K Wijarnpreecha, D Kim, P Raymond, M Scribani, A. Ahmed.
Associations between sarcopenia and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and advanced fibrosis in the USA.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 31 (2019), pp. 1121-1128
[17]
YM Wang, KF Zhu, WJ Zhou, Q Zhang, DF Deng, YC Yang, et al.
Sarcopenia is associated with the presence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Zhejiang Province, China: a cross-sectional observational study.
BMC Geriatr, 21 (2021), pp. 1-9
[18]
GE Chung, MJ Kim, JY Yim, JS Kim, JW. Yoon.
Sarcopenia is significantly associated with presence and severity of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
J Obes Metab Syndr, 28 (2019), pp. 129-138
[19]
Y Hashimoto, T Osaka, T Fukuda, M Tanaka, M Yamazaki, M. Fukui.
The relationship between hepatic steatosis and skeletal muscle mass index in men with type 2 diabetes.
Endocr J, 63 (2016), pp. 877-884
[20]
HC Hong, SY Hwang, HY Choi, HJ Yoo, JA Seo, SG Kim, et al.
Relationship between sarcopenia and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: the Korean sarcopenic obesity study.
Hepatology, 59 (2014), pp. 1772-1778
[21]
KS Hong, MC Kim, JH. Ahn.
Sarcopenia is an independent risk factor for NAFLD in COPD: a nationwide survey (KNHANES 2008–2011).
Int J COPD, 15 (2020), pp. 1005-1014
[22]
YC Hsieh, SK Joo, Koo BK, HC Lin, W. Kim.
Muscle alterations are independently associated with significant fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
Liver Int, 41 (2021), pp. 494-504
[23]
MK Kang, JG Park, HJ Lee, MC. Kim.
Association of low skeletal muscle mass with advanced liver fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol (Australia), 34 (2019), pp. 1633-1640
[24]
LJM Alferink, K Trajanoska, NS Erler, JD Schoufour, RJ de Knegt, MA Ikram, et al.
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in the rotterdam study: about muscle mass, sarcopenia, fat mass, and fat distribution.
J Bone Miner Res, 34 (2019), pp. 1254-1263
[25]
E Choe, H Kang, B Park, J Yang, J Kim.
The Association between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and CT-measured skeletal muscle mass.
J Clin Med, 7 (2018), pp. 310
[26]
D Gan, L Wang, M Jia, Y Ru, Y Ma, W Zheng, et al.
Low muscle mass and low muscle strength associate with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
Clin Nutr, 39 (2020), pp. 1124-1130
[27]
P Golabi, L Gerber, JM Paik, R Deshpande, L de Avila, ZM. Younossi.
Contribution of sarcopenia and physical inactivity to mortality in people with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
JHEP Rep, 2 (2020),
[28]
HY Kim, CW Kim, CH Park, JY Choi, K Han, AT Merchant, et al.
Low skeletal muscle mass is associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in Korean adults: the fifth Korea national health and nutrition examination survey.
Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Dis Int, 15 (2016), pp. 39-47
[29]
Y Kwon, SJ. Jeong.
Relative skeletal muscle mass is an important factor in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in non-obese children and adolescents.
J Clin Med, 9 (2020), pp. 3355
[30]
YH Lee, SU Kim, K Song, JY Park, DY Kim, SH Ahn, et al.
Sarcopenia is associated with significant liver fibrosis independently of obesity and insulin resistance in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Nationwide surveys (KNHANES 2008-2011).
Hepatology, 63 (2016), pp. 776-786
[31]
L Pacifico, FM Perla, G Andreoli, R Grieco, P Pierimarchi, C. Chiesa.
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is associated with low skeletal muscle mass in overweight/obese youths.
Front Pediatr, 8 (2020), pp. 1-8
[32]
X Su, J Xu, C. Zheng.
The relationship between non-alcoholic fatty liver and skeletal muscle mass to visceral fat area ratio in women with type 2 diabetes.
BMC Endocr Disord, 19 (2019), pp. 1-7
[33]
RA Bhanji, P Narayanan, MR Moynagh, N Takahashi, M Angirekula, CC Kennedy, et al.
Differing impact of sarcopenia and frailty in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and alcoholic liver disease.
Liver Transpl, 25 (2019 Jan 1), pp. 14-24
[34]
JH Lee, HS Lee, BK Lee, YJ Kwon, JW. Lee.
Relationship between muscle mass and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
Biology, 10 (2021 Feb 1), pp. 1-14
[35]
A Liberati, DG Altman, J Tetzlaff, C Mulrow, PC Gøtzsche, JPA Ioannidis, et al.
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration.
PLoS Med, 6 (2009),
[36]
National Institutes of Health (2014). Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. Available online at: https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-pro/guidelines/in-develop/cardiovascular-risk-reduction/tools/cohort.
[37]
JPT. Higgins.
The Cochrane Collaboration, (2008),
[38]
M Egger, GD Smith, M Schneider, C. Minder.
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test.
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed), 315 (1997 Feb), pp. 629-634
[39]
SH Ipekci, M Basaranoglu, A. Sonsuz.
The fluctuation of serum levels of aminotransferase in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis [3].
J Clin Gastroenterol, 36 (2003), pp. 371
[40]
E Yano, K Tagawa, K Yamaoka, M. Mori.
Test validity of periodic liver function tests in a population of Japanese male bank employees.
J Clin Epidemiol, 54 (2001), pp. 945-951
[41]
S Saadeh, ZM Younossi, EM Remer, T Gramlich, JP Ong, M Hurley, et al.
The utility of radiological imaging in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
Gastroenterology, 123 (2002), pp. 745-750
[42]
JA Kim, KM. Choi.
Sarcopenia and fatty liver disease.
Hepatol Int, 13 (2019), pp. 674-687
[43]
JF Cruz, YAC Ferrari, CP Machado, NN Santana, AVH Mota, SO. Lima.
Sarcopenia and severity of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
Arq Gastroenterol, 56 (2019 Oct), pp. 357-360
[44]
C V Tovo, SA Fernandes, C Buss, AA. De Mattos.
Sarcopenia and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: is there a relationship? A systematic review.
World J Hepatol, 9 (2017), pp. 326-332
[45]
P. Stål.
Liver fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease-diagnostic challenge with prognostic significance.
World J Gastroenterol, 21 (2015 Oct), pp. 11077-11087
[46]
DE Kleiner, EM Brunt, M Van Natta, C Behling, MJ Contos, OW Cummings, et al.
Design and validation of a histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
Hepatology, 41 (2005 Jun), pp. 1313-1321
[47]
B Kaufmann, A Reca, B Wang, H Friess, AE Feldstein, D. Hartmann.
Mechanisms of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and implications for surgery.
Langenbeck's Arch Surg, 406 (2021), pp. 1-17
[48]
R Yu, Q Shi, L Liu, L. Chen.
Relationship of sarcopenia with steatohepatitis and advanced liver fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a meta-analysis.
BMC Gastroenterol, 18 (2018 Apr),
[49]
Y Fukuoka, T Narita, H Fujita, T Morii, T Sato, MH Sassa, et al.
Importance of physical evaluation using skeletal muscle mass index and body fat percentage to prevent sarcopenia in elderly Japanese diabetes patients.
J Diabetes Investig, 10 (2019 Mar), pp. 322-330
[50]
Y Seko, N Mizuno, S Okishio, A Takahashi, S Kataoka, K Okuda, et al.
Clinical and pathological features of sarcopenia-related indices in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
Hepatol Res, 49 (2019 Jun), pp. 627-636
[51]
C Cai, X Song, Y Chen, X Chen, C. Yu.
Relationship between relative skeletal muscle mass and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hepatol Int, 14 (2020 Jan), pp. 115-126
Copyright © 2024. Fundación Clínica Médica Sur, A.C.
Descargar PDF
Article options
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos