metricas
covid
Buscar en
Clinics
Toda la web
Inicio Clinics Evaluation of HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8 haplotypes in patients with endometriosis, A c...
Journal Information
Vol. 79.
(January - December 2024)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Visits
987
Vol. 79.
(January - December 2024)
Original articles
Full text access
Evaluation of HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8 haplotypes in patients with endometriosis, A case-control study
Visits
987
Marina P. Andresa,b,*, Alessandra Peloggiac, Henrique M. Abraob, Thais F. Magalhaesa, João Siufi Netob, Mauricio Simões Abrãoa,b,
Corresponding author
msabrao@mac.com

Corresponding author.
a Divisão de Clínica Ginecológica, Departamento de Obstetrícia e Ginecologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
b Divisão de Clínica Ginecológica, BP ‒ A Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
c Centro de Pesquisa em Saúde Reprodutiva de Campinas (CEMICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil
Highlights

  • Celiac disease and endometriosis share inflammatory markers and pathophysiology.

  • HLA-DQ2 and/or HLA-DQ8 were similar between the control and endometriosis groups.

  • Anti- transglutaminase igA was similar between the control and endometriosis groups.

  • HLA-DQ2 and DQ8 had no difference in age, symptoms, endometriosis stage or location.

This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Tables (4)
Table 1. Characteristics of women with and without endometriosis. Parametrical variables were compared using T-Student testa. Categorical variables were compared using Pearson's Chi-Squared testb or Fisher's Exact testc.
Table 2. Characteristics of women with endometriosis by HLA-DQ2 status. Parametrical variables were compared using T-Student testa. Categorical variables were compared using Pearson's Chi-Squared testb or Fisher's Exact testc.
Table 3. Characteristics of women with endometriosis by HLA-DQ8 status. Parametrical variables were compared using T-Student testa. Categorical variables were compared using Pearson's Chi-Squared testb or Fisher's Exact testc.
Table 4. Multiple regression analysis evaluating symptoms, the presence of endometriosis, and HLA-DQ2, HLA-DQ8, age, and Anti-tissue transglutaminase IgA.
Show moreShow less
Abstract
Objective

To evaluate the relationship between genetic haplotypes associated with celiac disease (Human Leucocyte Antigen [HLA] DQ2 and DQ8) with the diagnosis, clinical presentation, and location of endometriosis in Brazilian women.

Method

A retrospective cross-sectional study, was conducted in a Tertiary hospital.

Patients

Women aged 18–50 years who underwent HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8 haplotype analysis.

Intervention

The patients were divided into endometriosis and control groups and evaluated for symptoms; endometriosis location, American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) stage, and the presence of anti-tissue transglutaminase IgA (anti-TgA), HLA-DQ2, and HLA-DQ8 markers.

Results

A total of 434 consecutive patients with (n = 315) and without (n = 119) endometriosis were included. Pain and infertility were more frequent in the endometriosis group than in the control group. The presence of HLA-DQ2, HLA-DQ8, and anti-TgA was similar between both groups. The presence of HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8 markers did not differ based on age, pain symptoms, ASRM stage, or endometriosis location.

Conclusion

Although there are similarities in inflammatory markers and pathophysiology between celiac disease and endometriosis, this study found no significant associations in the presence of HLA-DQ2 or HLA-DQ8 haplotypes and endometriosis.

Keywords:
Endometriosis
Celiac Disease
HLA-DQ2
HLA-DQ8
Anti-tissue transglutaminase IgA
Full Text
Introduction

Celiac Disease (CD) is an autoimmune disorder caused by T-cell reactivity to gluten consumption. It is characterized by small intestine inflammation, villous atrophy, and crypt hyperplasia. CD can also cause systemic symptoms in approximately half of the affected patients.1,2 The pathophysiology of CD is complex and involves both environmental and intrinsic variables. Predisposing genetic factors, specifically certain Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) haplotypes, are necessary but not sufficient for the symptoms to appear.2 The HLA-DQ2 haplotype, coded by the genes HLA-DQA1*0501 and HLA-DQB1*0201, is strongly associated with CD and found in up to 95 % of patients. The remaining patients carry either HLA-DQ8 or a variant of HLA-DQ2.2–4

HLA-DQ molecules present gluten peptides to T-cells, leading to inflammation and cytokine production.5 Genome-wide association studies have observed that the HLA region, particularly the DQA1 and DQB1 genes, has the strongest risk of CD.6,7 These genetic loci have also been observed in several immune-mediated diseases, suggesting that CD shares common pathways with other chronic diseases such as endometriosis.6–8

The diagnosis of CD relies on a combination of clinical, laboratory, and anatomopathological findings. It is confirmed by alterations seen in duodenal biopsy samples alongside positive antibody testing for anti-endomysial, anti-tissue transglutaminase (anti-Tg), or anti-gliadin antibodies.9 The risk of CD in HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8 carriers ranges from 0.17 % to 12.8 %.1011 At the population level, disease prevalence can be estimated by the presence of high titles of anti-Tg, while the absence of specific HLA-DQ variants suggests a negative predictor of CD.12

Endometriosis is defined by the presence of endometrial tissue outside the uterine cavity and affects 10 %‒15 % of women of reproductive age.1314 The pathophysiology of endometriosis involves immunological, inflammatory, and genetic factors, some of which overlap with pathways seen in CD.2,14–16 Studies have shown a higher prevalence of CD in women with endometriosis compared to healthy controls, and gluten-free diets have been shown to alleviate endometriosis symptoms.17–19

To investigate the possible relationship between CD and endometriosis, this study aimed to assess the relation between HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8 haplotypes and the diagnosis, clinical presentation, and location of endometriosis in Brazilian women.

Material and methods

This case-control study was conducted following the STROBE Statement and included 434 consecutive women aged 18‒50 years from the Gynecologic Department of Beneficiência Portuguesa Hospital and Clinica Medicina da Mulher from 2010 to 2020 who underwent the evaluation of HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8 haplotypes. The patients were divided into two groups: women with endometriosis and women without evidence of endometriosis, as determined by transvaginal ultrasound since the group has a high level of expertise in diagnosing the disease through this exam. As this was a retrospective study and the first to investigate the relation between endometriosis and HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8, no sample size calculation was performed. The authors included all patients with HLA genotyping evaluated during the study period.

Data obtained from the medical records included age, pain symptoms (evaluated using the 0‒10 visual analogic scale), presence of anti-tissue transglutaminase IgA (anti-TgA), HLA-DQ2, and HLA-DQ8 markers and presence or absence of endometriosis according to transvaginal ultrasounds performed using the protocol defined by Goncalves et al.,2021 location of lesions, and stage of endometriosis according to the American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) classification.22 The exclusion criteria for patients were unavailability of data and the presence of other inflammatory bowel diseases, pregnancy, or pelvic malignancies.

Ethics

This study was approved by the Internal Review Board of the Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa of São Paulo (number 3340139/2019). Data for this study was obtained retrospectively and anonymously from medical charts. Written consent was not obtained for this study.

Statistical analysis

The results are expressed as mean and standard deviation for normally distributed variables and as numbers and percentages for categorical variables. The Kolgomorov-Smirno was performed to evaluate the distribution of the variables. The categorical data was compared using the Pearson Chi-Square or Fisher's exact tests. Unpaired Student's t-test was used to compare continuous parametric variables and the Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare non-parametric variables between different groups. Multiple logistic regression and odds ratio analysis were used to assess the combined relationship between symptoms and the presence of endometriosis with age, HLA-DQ2, HLA_DQ8, and Anti-tissue transglutaminase IgA. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

A total of 315 patients with endometriosis and 119 without endometriosis were included in this study. The patient characteristics and symptoms are summarized in Table 1. The mean age was 39.1 years in the control group and 36.9 years in the endometriosis group (p = 0.05). Patients in the endometriosis group presented with more dysmenorrhea (p < 0.001), deep dyspareunia (p < 0.001), non-cyclic pelvic pain (p < 0.001), cyclic dysuria (p < 0.001), and more infertility (58.0 % vs. 31.6 %; p < 0.001) than those in the control group.

Table 1.

Characteristics of women with and without endometriosis. Parametrical variables were compared using T-Student testa. Categorical variables were compared using Pearson's Chi-Squared testb or Fisher's Exact testc.

  Control(n = 119)  Endometriosis(n = 315)   
Characteristics  Mean ± SD  Mean ± SD  p 
Age (years)  39.1 ± 10.8  36.9 ± 7.3  0.05a 
Dysmenorrhea (VAS)  4.5 ± 3.9  7.1 ± 3.0  <0.001a 
Chronic pelvic pain (VAS)  1.9 ± 3.1  3.6 ± 3.8  <0.001a 
Deep dyspareunia (VAS)  2.3 ± 3.4  4.2 ± 3.6  <0.001a 
Cyclic dysuria (VAS)  0.4 ± 1.7  0.6 ± 2.0  0.132a 
Cyclic dyschezia (VAS)  1.0 ± 2.6  2.7 ± 3.7  <0.001a 
Control(n = 119)  Endometriosis(n = 315)  p
n (%)  n (%) 
Infertility  24 (31.6)  112 (58.0)  <0.001b 
ASRM stage       
Not Reported  ‒  84 (26.7)   
‒  75 (23.8)   
II  ‒  61 (19.3)   
III  ‒  33 (10.4)   
IV  ‒  62 (19.6)   
Endometriosis type  ‒     
Not reported  ‒  6 (1.9)   
Superficial  ‒  77 (24.4)   
Ovarian  ‒  17 (5.4)   
Deep  ‒  215 (68.2)   
Site of deep endometriosis:       
Retrocervical  ‒  201 (63.8)   
Bowel  ‒  137 (43.5)   
Bladder  ‒  12 (3.8)   
Anti-tissue transglutaminase IgA, n (%)  5 (5.2)  7 (2.9)  0.329c 
HLA-DQ2, n (%)  48 (40.3)  111 (35.4)  0.337b 
HLA-DQ8, n (%)  15 (12.6)  47 (15.0)  0.531b 
HLA-DQ2 or DQ8, n (%)  60 (50.4)  148 (46.9)  0.522b 

Data shown as mean ± Standard Deviation (SD); VAS, Visual Analogue Scale; ASRM, American Society for reproductive Medicine, 1996.

In the endometriosis group, the patients were classified according to the ASRM classification:22 Stage I in 32.5 % (n = 75), Stage II in 26.4 % (n = 61), Stage III in 14.3 % (n = 33), and Stage IV in 26.8 % (n = 62) of cases. The type of endometriosis was superficial in 24.4 % (n = 77), ovarian in 5.4 % (n = 17), and deep endometriosis in 68.2 % (n = 215) of patients. The main sites affected by deep endometriosis were the retrocervical (63.8 %, n = 201), bowel (43.5 %, n = 137), and bladder (3.8 %, n = 12).

Comparison of CD markers in the endometriosis and control groups showed no significant differences. Anti-tissue transglutaminase IgA was positive in 5.2 % of patients in the control group and in 2.9 % of patients in the endometriosis group (p = 0.329). There was no difference in the prevalence of HLA-DQ2 (40.3 % vs. 35.4 %; p = 0.0337) or HLA-DQ8 (12.6 % vs. 15.0 %; p = 0.531) between the control and endometriosis groups.

While analyzing the patients with endometriosis, the mean age was similar for those with and without HLA-DQ2 (37.4 ± 5.9 years vs. 36.8±7.5 years; p = 0.337, respectively) and HLA-DQ8 (37.4 ± 5.9 vs. 36.8 ± years; p = 0.477). Endometriosis symptoms such as dysmenorrhea, acyclic pain, deep dyspareunia, cyclical dysuria, cyclical dysphasia, and infertility were not significantly different between patients with or without HLA-DQ8 or HLA-DQ2. The location of endometriosis implants was also not associated with the presence or absence of HLA-DQ2 or HLA-DQ8 (Tables 2 and 3).

Table 2.

Characteristics of women with endometriosis by HLA-DQ2 status. Parametrical variables were compared using T-Student testa. Categorical variables were compared using Pearson's Chi-Squared testb or Fisher's Exact testc.

  HLA-DQ2+(n = 111)  HLA-DQ2-(n = 203)   
Characteristic  Mean ± SD  Mean ± SD  p 
Age (years)  36.0 ± 7.4  37.3 ± 7.2  0.181b 
Dysmenorrhea (VAS)  7.4 ± 2.7  6.9 ± 3.2  0.230b 
Acyclic pain (VAS)  3.9 ± 3.8  3.5 ± 3.8  0.469b 
Deep dyspareunia (VAS)  4.1 ± 3.8  4.2 ± 3.5  0.880b 
Cyclic dysuria (VAS)  0.8 ± 2.1  0.6 ± 1.9  0.766b 
Cyclic dyschezia (VAS)  2.9 ± 3.9  2.6 ± 3.6  0.488b 
  n (%)  n (%)   
Infertility  38 (62.3)  74 (56.1)  0.415a 
ASRM stage       
29 (33.0)  46 (32.4)  0.969a 
II  22 (25.0)  39 (27.5)   
III  12 (13.6)  20 (14.1)   
IV  25 (28.4)  37 (26.1)   
Endometriosis type       
Superficial  30 (39.0)  47 (61.0)  0.788a 
Ovarian  6 (35.3)  11 (64.7)   
Deep  74 (34.4)  140 (65.1)   
Site of deep endometriosis       
Retrocervical  68 (61.8)  132 (67.3)  0.329a 
Bowel  46 (42.2)  90 (46.4)  0.482a 
Bladder  5 (4.6)  7 (3.7)  0.762c 

Data shown as mean ± SD;

a

Chi-Squared test;

b

T-Student test; cFisher's Exact test; VAS, Visual Analogue Scale; ASRM, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, 1996.

Table 3.

Characteristics of women with endometriosis by HLA-DQ8 status. Parametrical variables were compared using T-Student testa. Categorical variables were compared using Pearson's Chi-Squared testb or Fisher's Exact testc.

CharacteristicHLA-DQ8+(n = 47)  HLA-DQ8-(n = 267)  p
Mean ± SD  Mean ± SD 
Age (years)  37.4 ± 5.9  36.8 ± 7.5  0.477b 
Dysmenorrhea (VAS)  6.9 ± 3.0  7.1 ± 3.1  0.453b 
Acyclic pain (VAS)  3.9 ± 4.1  3.6 ± 3.8  0.673b 
Deep dyspareunia (VAS)  3.8 ± 3.5  4.2 ± 3.6  0.434b 
Cyclic dysuria (VAS)  0.6 ± 1.9  0.7 ± 2.0  0.595b 
Cyclic dyschezia (VAS)  3.5 ± 3.9  2.5 ± 3.7  0.120b 
  n (%)  n (%)   
Infertility  16 (55.2)  96 (58.5)  0.735a 
ASRM stage       
11 (29.7)  64 (33.2)  0.970a 
II  10 (27.0)  51 (26.4)   
III  5 (13.5)  27 (14.0)   
IV  11 (29.7)  51 (26.4)   
Endometriosis type       
Superficial  12 (15.6)  65 (84.4)  0.599a 
Ovarian  1 (5.9)  16 (94.1)   
Deep  33 (15.3)  181 (84.7)   
Site of deep endometriosis       
Retrocervical  32 (69.6)  168 (64.6)  0.515a 
Bowel  23 (51.1)  113 (43.8)  0.363a 
Bladder  2 (4.4)  10 (3.9)  0.699c 

Data shown as mean ± SD;

a

Chi-squared test;

b

T-Student test;

c

Fisher's exact test; VAS, Visual Analogue Scale; ASRM, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, 1996.

Multiple logistic regression was performed (Table 4) and showed no significant relation between pain symptoms, infertility, presence of endometriosis with the presence of HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8 haplotypes, anti-tissue transglutaminase IgA, and age.

Table 4.

Multiple regression analysis evaluating symptoms, the presence of endometriosis, and HLA-DQ2, HLA-DQ8, age, and Anti-tissue transglutaminase IgA.

VariableCo-variableOR95% ICpa
Inferior  Superior 
DysmenorrheaAnti TGA  0.548  0.132  2.267  0.406 
HLA-DQ2  1.168  0.717  1.904  0.532 
HLA-DQ8  1.286  0.659  2.509  0.460 
Age  0.931  0.902  0.961  0.000 
DyspareuniaAnti TGA  0.902  0.255  3.186  0.872 
HLA-DQ2  0.740  0.456  1.203  0.224 
HLA-DQ8  0.793  0.407  1.546  0.496 
Age  0.992  0.963  1.023  0.621 
DyscheziaAnti TGA  347664436.454  0.000    0.999 
HLA-DQ2  0.995  0.542  1.830  0.988 
HLA-DQ8  0.663  0.302  1.455  0.305 
Age  0.971  0.936  1.008  0.128 
DysuriaAnti TGA  0.536  0.060  4.825  0.578 
HLA-DQ2  0.394  0.123  1.256  0.115 
HLA-DQ8  66677154.537  0.000    0.998 
Age  1.012  0.946  1.082  0.724 
Acyclic painAnti TGA  1.727  0.355  8.404  0.498 
HLA-DQ2  1.073  0.644  1.789  0.786 
HLA-DQ8  0.634  0.321  1.252  0.190 
Age  0.994  0.964  1.025  0.694 
InfertilityAnti TGA  1.988  0.463  8.534  0.355 
HLA-DQ2  1.067  0.589  1.931  0.831 
HLA-DQ8  0.720  0.328  1.582  0.414 
Age  0.963  0.926  1.002  0.062 
Presence of endometriosisAnti TGA  2.047  0.594  7.058  0.256 
HLA-DQ2  1.303  0.795  2.134  0.294 
HLA-DQ8  0.771  0.372  1.600  0.485 
Age  0.975  0.947  1.004  0.091 
a

Multiple regression analysis. Anti TGA, Anti-tissue Transglutaminase IgA; OR, Odds Ratio; CI, Confidence Interval.

Discussion

The aim of this study was to evaluate the relation of HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8 haplotypes that may predispose to CD with endometriosis, its clinical presentation, and the locations of endometriotic implants. Consistent with previous research, there were significant differences between the endometriosis and control groups in terms of symptoms, as pain is a defining characteristic of the disease. A previous study conducted by Fuldeore et al reported similar outcomes in regard to symptoms comparing patients with endometriosis to those without endometriosis.23

Although several studies compared endometriosis with HLA-G and HLA-C,24–26 and some studies compared endometriosis to anti-tissue transglutaminase IgA,1819 there have been no reports so far investigating the relation between endometriosis and HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8. On the other hand, studies compared the presence of HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8 markers with other inflammatory conditions, such as Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD).2327 In 2018, Bosca-Watts et al. conducted a study quantifying the frequency of CD-related haplotypes in the IBD population, and their findings showed that these haplotypes were not more common in this specific group.27 In accordance, these results showed no relation between these markers (analyzed separately or together) with endometriosis, when compared to the control group.

The authors chose the antigens HLA-DQ2 and DQ8 for this study because they represent the antigen presentation for gluten in CD.5 The authors hypothesized that CD might have an influence on bowel endometriosis, based on the results of a study that showed the benefits of a gluten-free diet in the progression and symptoms of the disease.17 This way, if HLA-DQ2 and DQ8 when expressed, can start an inflammatory chain with gluten as the trigger point,11 this hypothesis may be valid. However, the present results showed no statistical relation between HLA-DQ2 and DQ8 and the site or symptoms of endometriosis.

A limitation of this study was the lack of a histopathological diagnosis of CD. Although the present results showed no significant relation between endometriosis and CD, it is still possible that there is a connection between the two that could be confirmed by a histopathological diagnosis. Additionally, the small number of subjects with available anti-tissue transglutaminase IgA results associated with HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8 in the presumptive diagnosis of CD could weaken the statistical analysis. Another possible limitation of this study was its retrospective design. Therefore, a prospective study that evaluates the diagnosis of both CD and endometriosis would provide more reliable results. The strength of this study is its large sample size, which would be difficult to achieve in a prospective cohort.

Conclusion

This study showed no significant differences in HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8 haplotypes between patients with endometriosis and those without. These haplotypes were not associated with pain symptoms, stage, or site of endometriosis. Further studies with histologically confirmed CD diagnosis are necessary to achieve more accurate conclusions.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Authors’ contributions

Marina P. Andres: Manuscript writing, data collection, data analysis, study design.

Alessandra Peloggia: Manuscript writing, data analysis.

Henrique M. Abrao: Manuscript writing, data collection, data analysis, study design.

Thais F. Magalhaes: Data collection, study design.

João Siufi Neto: Manuscript writing, study design.

Mauricio S. Abrão: Manuscript writing, study design.

References
[1]
JF Ludvigsson, DA Leffler, JC Bai, F Biagi, A Fasano, PHR Green, et al.
The Oslo definitions for coeliac disease and related terms.
[2]
KE Lundin, C. Wijmenga.
Coeliac disease and autoimmune disease-genetic overlap and screening.
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 12 (2015), pp. 507-515
[3]
H Joda, V Beni, N Alakulppi, J Partanen, K Lind, L Strömbom, et al.
Medium-high resolution electrochemical genotyping of HLA-DQ2/DQ8 for detection of predisposition to coeliac disease.
Anal Bioanal Chem, 406 (2014), pp. 2757-2769
[4]
MM Pietzak, TC Schofield, MJ McGinniss, RM. Nakamura.
Stratifying risk for celiac disease in a large at-risk United States population by using HLA alleles.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 7 (2009), pp. 966-971
[5]
G Bodis, V Toth, A. Schwarting.
Role of human leukocyte antigens (HLA) in autoimmune diseases.
Rheumatol Ther, 5 (2018), pp. 5-20
[6]
V Kumar, C Wijmenga, S. Withoff.
From genome-wide association studies to disease mechanisms: celiac disease as a model for autoimmune diseases.
Semin Immunopathol, 34 (2012), pp. 567-580
[7]
V Kumar, C Wijmenga, RJ. Xavier.
Genetics of immune-mediated disorders: from genome-wide association to molecular mechanism.
Curr Opin Immunol, 31 (2014), pp. 51-57
[8]
M Parkes, A Cortes, DA van Heel, MA. Brown.
Genetic insights into common pathways and complex relationships among immune-mediated diseases.
Nat Rev Genet, 14 (2013), pp. 661-673
[9]
JF Ludvigsson, JC Bai, F Biagi, TR Card, C Ciacci, PJ Ciclitira, et al.
Diagnosis and management of adult coeliac disease: guidelines from the British Society of Gastroenterology.
Gut, 63 (2014), pp. 1210-1228
[10]
G Abraham, JA Tye-Din, OG Bhalala, A Kowalczyk, J Zobel, M. Inouye.
Accurate and robust genomic prediction of celiac disease using statistical learning [published correction appears in PLoS Genet. 2014;10(4):e1004374].
PLoS Genet, 10 (2014),
[11]
M Galatola, D Cielo, C Panico, P Stellato, B Malamisura, L Carbone, et al.
Presymptomatic diagnosis of celiac disease in predisposed children: the role of gene expression profile.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, 65 (2017), pp. 314-320
[12]
JG Muniz, VL Sdepanian, U Fagundes Neto.
Prevalence of genetic susceptibility for celiac disease in blood donors in São Paulo, Brazil.
Arq Gastroenterol., 53 (2016), pp. 267-272
[13]
JP Christ, O Yu, R Schulze-Rath, J Grafton, K Hansen, SD. Reed.
Incidence, prevalence, and trends in endometriosis diagnosis: a United States population-based study from 2006 to 2015.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 225 (2021), pp. 500.e1-500.e9
[14]
TM Gruber, S. Mechsner.
Pathogenesis of endometriosis: the origin of pain and subfertility.
Cells., 10 (2021), pp. 1381
[15]
N Shigesi, M Kvaskoff, S Kirtley, Q Feng, H Fang, JC Knight, et al.
The association between endometriosis and autoimmune diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hum Reprod Update, 25 (2019), pp. 486-503
[16]
LGC Riccio, EC Baracat, C Chapron, F Batteux, MS. Abrão.
The role of the B lymphocytes in endometriosis: a systematic review.
J Reprod Immunol, 123 (2017), pp. 29-34
[17]
M Marziali, T. Capozzolo.
Role of gluten-free diet in the management of chronic pelvic pain of deep infiltranting endometriosis.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 22 (2015), pp. S51-S52
[18]
L Santoro, S Campo, F D'Onofrio, A Gallo, M Covino, V Campo, et al.
Looking for celiac disease in Italian women with endometriosis: a case control study.
Biomed Res Int, 2014 (2014),
[19]
FM Aguiar, SB Melo, LC Galvão, JC Rosa-e-Silva, RM dos Reis, RA. Ferriani.
Serological testing for celiac disease in women with endometriosis. A pilot study.
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol, 36 (2009), pp. 23-25
[20]
MO Goncalves, J Siufi Neto, MP Andres, D Siufi, LA de Mattos, MS Abrao.
Systematic evaluation of endometriosis by transvaginal ultrasound can accurately replace diagnostic laparoscopy, mainly for deep and ovarian endometriosis.
Hum Reprod, 36 (2021), pp. 1492-1500
[21]
MO Goncalves, S Podgaec, JA Dias Jr, M Gonzalez, MS. Abrao.
Transvaginal ultrasonography with bowel preparation is able to predict the number of lesions and rectosigmoid layers affected in cases of deep endometriosis, defining surgical strategy.
Hum Reprod, 25 (2010), pp. 665-671
[22]
Revised American society for reproductive medicine classification of endometriosis: 1996.
Fertil Steril, 67 (1997), pp. 817-821
[23]
MJ Fuldeore, AM. Soliman.
Prevalence and symptomatic burden of diagnosed endometriosis in the United States: national estimates from a cross-sectional survey of 59,411 women.
Gynecol Obstet Invest, 82 (2017), pp. 453-461
[24]
Y-C Chou, C-H Chen, M-J Chen, C-W Chang, P-H Chen, M-H Yu, et al.
Killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIR) and human leukocyte antigen-C (HLA-C) allorecognition patterns in women with endometriosis.
[25]
MR Rached, V Coelho, MLC Marin, K Pincerato, A Fujita, JE Kalil, et al.
HLA-G is upregulated in advanced endometriosis.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 235 (2019), pp. 36-41
[26]
B Santoso, A Sa'adi, SR Dwiningsih, A Tunjungseto, MYA Widyanugraha, AF Mufid, et al.
Soluble immune checkpoints CTLA-4, HLA-G, PD-1, and PD-L1 are associated with endometriosis-related infertility.
Am J Reprod Immunol, 84 (2020), pp. e13296
[27]
MM Bosca-Watts, M Minguez, D Planelles, S Navarro, A Rodriguez, J Santiago, et al.
HLA-DQ: Celiac disease vs inflammatory bowel disease.
World J Gastroenterol, 24 (2018), pp. 96-103
Copyright © 2023. HCFMUSP
Download PDF
Article options
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos

Quizás le interese:
10.1016/j.clinsp.2022.100074
No mostrar más