Validación del Cuestionario de metas de logro 2×2 en Educación Física

Article information

Resumen

El objetivo de este artículo es validar al castellano el Cuestionario de metas de logro 2×2 Achievement Goal in Physical Education Questionnaire (2×2 AGPEQ) de Wang, Biddle y Elliot (2007). Si bien existe otro cuestionario validado por Moreno, González-Cutre y Sicilia (2008) de la versión de Guan, Xiang, McBride y Bruene (2006), se han constatado ítems diferentes entre ambas versiones. Asimismo, este inventario aporta básicamente 2 novedades: una revisión de la validez de contenido de la subescala evitación-rendimiento para precisar su carácter interpersonal consecuente con el marco teórico, y una escala Likert de 5 puntos que simplifica las opciones de respuesta y se ajusta más a las referencias habituales en el contexto educativo español. Doscientos sesenta y nueve estudiantes adolescentes tomaron parte en el estudio. El análisis factorial confirmatorio apoyó la estructura factorial del marco de meta del logro 2×2 en el contexto de la educación física. La fiabilidad interna y la validez discriminante fueron apropiadas. El cuestionario presentó una alta validez concurrente para una serie de variables asociadas a las metas de logro como son las diferentes regulaciones motivacionales. Esta herramienta puede ser de gran utilidad para el estudio de la motivación de logro 2×2 al hacer más patentes las diferencias entre constructos.

Palabras clave:

Metas de logro

Educación física

Análisis factorial confirmatorio

Motivación

Abstract

The goal of this article is to validate the 2×2 Achievement Goal Questionnaire in Physical Education (2×2 AGPEQ) from Wang et al. (2007). There is another version of this questionnaire validated by Moreno et al. (2008), but these authors used the Guan, Xiang, McBride and Bruene (2006) version, and different items have been detected between the two original instruments. The questionnaire presented in this article introduces two innovations: a review of the content validity of the avoidance-performance subscale (its interpersonal character has been specified consistent with the theoretical framework), and a 5-point likert scale (it simplifies subjects’ response and it fits better the different references in the Spanish context). 269 adolescent students participated in the study. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the factor structure of the 2×2 goal achievement framework in the physical education context. Internal reliability and discriminant validity were appropriate. The questionnaire showed high concurrent validity regarding several variables associated to the achievement goals such as the different motivational regulations. This instrument can be of great help for the study of 2×2 goal motivation, because it makes more visible the differences among constructs.

Keywords:

Achievement goals

Physical education

Confirmatory factor analysis

Motivation

Full text is only aviable in PDF

Referencias

[Atkinson, 1957]

J.W. Atkinson.

Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior.

Psychological Review, 64 (1957), pp. 359-372

Medline

[Bentler, 1990]

P.M. Bentler.

Comparative fit indexes in structural models.

Psychological Bulletin, 107 (1990), pp. 238-246

Medline

[Byrne, 2001]

B.M. Byrne.

Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications and programming.

Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, (2001),

[Bollen and Stine, 1992]

K.A. Bollen, R.A. Stine.

Bootstrapping Goodness-of-Fit Measures in Structural Equation. Models.

Sociological Methods & Research, 21 (1992), pp. 205-229

http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006284 | Medline

[Cecchini et al., 2011]

J.A. Cecchini, C. González, A. Méndez-Giménez, J. Fernández-Río.

Achievement goals, social goals, and motivational regulations in physical education settings.

Psicothema, 23 (2011), pp. 51-57

Medline

[Chen, 2007]

L.H. Chen.

Construct validity of Chinese 2×2 achievement goal questionnairein physical education: Evidence from collectivistic culture.

Comunicación presentada en la 5. a conferencia de la Asian South Pacific Association of Sport Psychology, Bangkok, Tailandia,

[Conroy et al., 2003]

D.E. Conroy, A.J. Elliot, S.M. Hofer.

A 2×2 Achievement Goals Questionnaire for Sport: Evidence for factorial invariance, temporal stability, and external validity.

Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 25 (2003), pp. 456-476

[Conroy et al., 2006]

D.E. Conroy, M.P. Kaye, J.D. Coatsworth.

Coaching climates and the destructive effects of mastery-avoidance achievement goals on situational motivation.

Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 28 (2006), pp. 69-92

[Dweck, 1986]

C.S. Dweck.

Motivational processes affecting motivation.

The American Psychologist, 41 (1986), pp. 1040-1048

[Elliot, 1999]

A.J. Elliot.

Approach, avoidance motivation, achievement goals.

Educational Psychologist, 34 (1999), pp. 169-189

[Elliot, 2005]

A.J. Elliot.

A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct.

Handbook of competence and motivation, pp. 52-72

[Elliot and Church, 1997]

A.J. Elliot, M.A. Church.

A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation.

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72 (1997), pp. 218-232

[Elliot and Harackiewicz, 1996]

A.J. Elliot, J.M. Harackiewicz.

Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A meditational analysis.

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70 (1996), pp. 461-475

[Elliot and McGregor, 2001]

A.J. Elliot, H.A. McGregor.

A 2×2 achievement goal framework.

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80 (2001), pp. 501-519

Medline

[Elliot and Thrash, 2002]

A.J. Elliot, T.M. Thrash.

Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: Approach and avoidance temperaments and goals.

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82 (2002), pp. 804-818

Medline

[Fornell and Larcker, 1981]

C. Fornell, D.F. Larcker.

Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics.

Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1981), pp. 39-50

[Goudas et al., 1994]

M. Goudas, S.J.H. Biddle, K. Fox.

Perceived locus of causality, goal orientations and perceived competence in school physical education classes.

British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64 (1994), pp. 453-463

Medline

[Guan et al., 2006]

J. Guan, P. Xiang, R. McBride, A. Bruene.

Achievement goals, social goals, and students’ reported persistence and effort in high school physical education.

Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 25 (2006), pp. 58-74

[Guan et al., 2007]

J. Guan, R. McBride, P. Xiang.

Reliability and validity evidence for achievementgoal models in high school physical education settings.

Measurement in Physical Educationand Exercise Sciences, 11 (2007), pp. 109-129

[Hair et al., 2006]

J.F. Hair, W.C. Black, B.J. Babin, R.E. Anderson, R.L. Tatham.

Multivariate Data Analysis.

6.a, Pearson, (2006),

[Hambleton, 1996]

R.K. Hambleton.

Adaptación de test para su uso en diferentes idiomas y culturas: fuentes de error, posibles soluciones y directrices prácticas.

Psicometría,

[Harackiewicz et al., 2002]

J.M. Harackiewicz, K.E. Barron, P.R. Pintrich, A.J. Elliot, T.M. Thrash.

Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating.

Journal of Educational Psychology, 94 (2002), pp. 638-645

[Hu and Bentler, 1999]

L. Hu, P.M. Bentler.

Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariancestructure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.

Structural Equation Modeling, 6 (1999), pp. 1-55

[Janssen and Van Yperen, 2004]

O. Janssen, N.W. Van Yperen.

Employees’ goal orientations, the quality of leader-member exchange, and the outcomes of job performance and job satisfaction.

Academy of Management Journal, 47 (2004), pp. 368-384

[Linnenbrink and Pintrich, 2000]

E.A. Linnenbrink, P.R. Pintrich.

Multiple pathways to learning and achievement: The role of goal orientation in fosteringadaptive motivation, affect, and cognition.

Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance, pp. 195-227

[Marsh et al., 2004]

H.W. Marsh, K.T. Hau, Z. Wen.

In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralising Hu & Bentler's (1999) findings.

Structural Equation Modeling, 11 (2004), pp. 320-341

[Moreno et al., 2009]

J.A. Moreno, D. González-Cutre, M. Chillón.

Preliminary validation in Spanish of a scale designed to measure motivation in physical education classes: the Perceived Locus of Causality (PLOC) Scale.

The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 12 (2009), pp. 327-337

Medline

[Moreno et al., 2008]

J.A. Moreno, D. González-Cutre, A. Sicilia.

Metas de logro 2×2 en estudiantes españoles de educación física.

Revista de Educación, 347 (2008), pp. 299-317

[Nevitt and Hancock, 2001]

J. Nevitt, G.R. Hancock.

Performance of bootstrapping approaches to model test statistics and parameter standard error estimation in structural equation modeling.

Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8 (2001), pp. 353-377

[Nicholls, 1984]

J.G. Nicholls.

Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance.

Psychological Review, 91 (1984), pp. 328-346

[Nicholls, 1989]

J.G. Nicholls.

The competitive ethos and democratic education.

Harvard University Press, (1989),

[Nunnally, 1978]

J.C. Nunnally.

Psychometric theory.

McGraw-Hill, (1978),

[Papaioannou et al., 2007]

A.G. Papaioannou, D. Milosis, E. Kosmidou, N. Tsigilis.

Motivational Climate and Achievement Goals at the Situational Level of Generality.

Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 19 (2007), pp. 38-66

[Papaioannou et al., 2007]

A.G. Papaioannou, N. Tsigilis, E. Kosmidou, D. Milosis.

Measuring Perceived Motivational Climate in Physical Education.

Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 26 (2007), pp. 236-259

[Payne et al., 2007]

S.C. Payne, S.S. Youngcourt, J.M. Beaubien.

A metaanalytic examination of the goal orientation nomological net.

Journal of Applied Psychology, 92 (2007), pp. 128-150

http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.128 | Medline

[Rawsthorne and Elliot, 1999]

L.J. Rawsthorne, A.J. Elliot.

Achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A meta-analytic review.

Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3 (1999), pp. 326-344

http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0304_3 | Medline

[Satorra and Bentler, 2001]

A. Satorra, P.M. Bentler.

A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis.

Psychometrika, 66 (2001), pp. 507-514

[Van Yperen, 2006]

N.W. Van Yperen.

A novel approach to assessing achievement goals in the context of the 2×2 framework: Identifying distinct profiles of individuals with different dominant achievement goals.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32 (2006), pp. 1432-1445

http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167206292093 | Medline

[Van Yperen et al., 2011]

N.W. Van Yperen, M.R.W. Hamstra, M. Van der Klauw.

To win, or not to lose, at any cost: The impact of achievement goals on cheating.

British Journal of Management, 22 (2011), pp. S5-S15

[Van Yperen and Renkema, 2008]

N.W. Van Yperen, L.J. Renkema.

Performing great and the purpose of performing better than others: On the recursiveness of the achievement goal adoption process.

European Journal of Social Psychology, 38 (2008), pp. 260-271

[Wang et al., 2007]

C.K.J. Wang, S.J.H. Biddle, A.J. Elliot.