was read the article
array:24 [ "pii" => "S2341192916300361" "issn" => "23411929" "doi" => "10.1016/j.redare.2016.07.002" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2016-12-01" "aid" => "700" "copyright" => "Sociedad Española de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor" "copyrightAnyo" => "2016" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Revista Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación (English Version). 2016;63:564-71" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 7 "formatos" => array:2 [ "HTML" => 5 "PDF" => 2 ] ] "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "es" => array:19 [ "pii" => "S0034935616300044" "issn" => "00349356" "doi" => "10.1016/j.redar.2016.03.006" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2016-12-01" "aid" => "700" "copyright" => "Sociedad Española de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2016;63:564-71" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 187 "formatos" => array:2 [ "HTML" => 151 "PDF" => 36 ] ] "es" => array:13 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">ORIGINAL</span>" "titulo" => "Calidad de la recuperación posquirúrgica tras cirugía de mama. Anestesia general combinada con bloqueo paravertebral versus bloqueo del espacio serrato-intercostal" "tienePdf" => "es" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "es" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "es" 1 => "en" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "564" "paginaFinal" => "571" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "en" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Quality of postoperative recovery after breast surgery. General anaesthesia combined with paravertebral versus serratus-intercostal block" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "es" => true "en" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "es" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "es" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Figura 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 971 "Ancho" => 1582 "Tamanyo" => 182351 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "es" => "<p id="spar0045" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Abordaje paravertebral torácico guiado por ultrasonidos. Imagen obtenida con el transductor situado tal como se explica en el texto. La flecha indica la diana de la colocación de la aguja para la inyección del anestésico local, tras lo que se debe observar un «abombamiento» de la pleura correspondiente.</p> <p id="spar0050" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">IICM: membrana del músculo intercostal interno; PL: pleura; PVS: espacio paravertebral; TP: apófisis transversa correspondiente a T.</p>" ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "M.A. Pérez Herrero, S. López Álvarez, A. Fadrique Fuentes, F. Manzano Lorefice, C. Bartolomé Bartolomé, J. González de Zárate" "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "M.A." "apellidos" => "Pérez Herrero" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "S." "apellidos" => "López Álvarez" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "A." "apellidos" => "Fadrique Fuentes" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "F." "apellidos" => "Manzano Lorefice" ] 4 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "C." "apellidos" => "Bartolomé Bartolomé" ] 5 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "J." "apellidos" => "González de Zárate" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "en" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S2341192916300361" "doi" => "10.1016/j.redare.2016.07.002" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2341192916300361?idApp=UINPBA00004N" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S0034935616300044?idApp=UINPBA00004N" "url" => "/00349356/0000006300000010/v1_201611170023/S0034935616300044/v1_201611170023/es/main.assets" ] ] "itemSiguiente" => array:19 [ "pii" => "S2341192916300397" "issn" => "23411929" "doi" => "10.1016/j.redare.2016.08.003" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2016-12-01" "aid" => "713" "copyright" => "Sociedad Española de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Revista Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación (English Version). 2016;63:572-6" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "en" => array:12 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Original article</span>" "titulo" => "Assessment of TruviewPCD videolaryngoscope for intubation in children" "tienePdf" => "en" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "en" 1 => "es" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "572" "paginaFinal" => "576" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Evaluación del videolaringoscopio TruviewPCD para la intubación de niños" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "en" => true "es" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "C. Añez Simón, L. Barbero Roldán, V. Serrano Gonzalvo, C.M. Holgado Pascual, V. Farre Nebot, M.I. de Molina-Fernández" "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "C." "apellidos" => "Añez Simón" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "L." "apellidos" => "Barbero Roldán" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "V." "apellidos" => "Serrano Gonzalvo" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "C.M." "apellidos" => "Holgado Pascual" ] 4 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "V." "apellidos" => "Farre Nebot" ] 5 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "M.I." "apellidos" => "de Molina-Fernández" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "es" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S003493561630038X" "doi" => "10.1016/j.redar.2016.04.008" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S003493561630038X?idApp=UINPBA00004N" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2341192916300397?idApp=UINPBA00004N" "url" => "/23411929/0000006300000010/v1_201611250118/S2341192916300397/v1_201611250118/en/main.assets" ] "itemAnterior" => array:19 [ "pii" => "S234119291630035X" "issn" => "23411929" "doi" => "10.1016/j.redare.2016.07.001" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2016-12-01" "aid" => "697" "copyright" => "Sociedad Española de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Revista Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación (English Version). 2016;63:556-63" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 2 "HTML" => 2 ] "en" => array:13 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Original article</span>" "titulo" => "Comparison of the Cortínez and the Schnider models with a targeted effect-site TCI of 3<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mcg/ml in biophase in healthy volunteers" "tienePdf" => "en" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "en" 1 => "es" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "556" "paginaFinal" => "563" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Comparación del modelo de Cortínez y de Schnider en perfusión de propofol controlada por objetivo de 3 mcg/ml, a biofase, en voluntarios sanos" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "en" => true "es" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0010" "etiqueta" => "Figure 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr2.jpeg" "Alto" => 1490 "Ancho" => 2673 "Tamanyo" => 344546 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0050" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">BIS changes over time in all volunteers.</p>" ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "C. Frederico Avendaño, L.I. Cortínez, C.R. Ramírez-Paesano" "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "C." "apellidos" => "Frederico Avendaño" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "L.I." "apellidos" => "Cortínez" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "C.R." "apellidos" => "Ramírez-Paesano" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "es" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S0034935616300019" "doi" => "10.1016/j.redar.2016.03.004" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S0034935616300019?idApp=UINPBA00004N" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S234119291630035X?idApp=UINPBA00004N" "url" => "/23411929/0000006300000010/v1_201611250118/S234119291630035X/v1_201611250118/en/main.assets" ] "en" => array:20 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Original article</span>" "titulo" => "Quality of postoperative recovery after breast surgery. General anaesthesia combined with paravertebral versus serratus-intercostal block" "tieneTextoCompleto" => true "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "564" "paginaFinal" => "571" ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "autoresLista" => "M.A. Pérez Herrero, S. López Álvarez, A. Fadrique Fuentes, F. Manzano Lorefice, C. Bartolomé Bartolomé, J. González de Zárate" "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => array:4 [ "nombre" => "M.A." "apellidos" => "Pérez Herrero" "email" => array:1 [ 0 => "mapeherrero@gmail.com" ] "referencia" => array:2 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] 1 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">*</span>" "identificador" => "cor0005" ] ] ] 1 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "S." "apellidos" => "López Álvarez" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">b</span>" "identificador" => "aff0010" ] ] ] 2 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "A." "apellidos" => "Fadrique Fuentes" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] ] ] 3 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "F." "apellidos" => "Manzano Lorefice" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] ] ] 4 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "C." "apellidos" => "Bartolomé Bartolomé" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] ] ] 5 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "J." "apellidos" => "González de Zárate" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] ] ] ] "afiliaciones" => array:2 [ 0 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain" "etiqueta" => "a" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] 1 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain" "etiqueta" => "b" "identificador" => "aff0010" ] ] "correspondencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "cor0005" "etiqueta" => "⁎" "correspondencia" => "Corresponding author." ] ] ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Calidad de la recuperación posquirúrgica tras cirugía de mama. Anestesia general combinada con bloqueo paravertebral versus bloqueo del espacio serrato-intercostal" ] ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Figure 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 972 "Ancho" => 1585 "Tamanyo" => 150569 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0045" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral approach. Image obtained with the transducer positioned as described in the text. The arrow shows the target local anaesthetic injection site, behind which the corresponding pleural “ballooning” should be observed. IICM: Internal intercostal membrane; PL: pleura; PVS: paravertebral space; TP: transverse process.</p>" ] ] ] "textoCompleto" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSections"><span id="sec0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0065">Introduction</span><p id="par0005" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Breast cancer surgery is one of the most common procedures performed in developed countries.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0155"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1</span></a> Conservative surgery, which is just as effective but more aesthetically acceptable, is now the most common approach. Along with advances in surgical techniques, spectacular progress has also been made in anaesthetic and analgesic management strategies that speed up recovery time and greatly improve post-operative well being.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0160"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2–6</span></a> A wide variety of procedures and approaches to breast cancer surgery have been described in the literature, including general, locoregional, and local anaesthesia, and even intravenous lidocaine perfusion.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0185"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">7</span></a> Although there is no evidence to show the superiority of any of these over others, most anaesthesiologists prefer combined techniques, given the complex innervation of the breast, the high rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting and acute and chronic pain, and the potential association between opioids and the appearance of metastasis and tumour recurrence.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0190"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8</span></a></p><p id="par0010" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The regional technique of choice for the thorax is still the paravertebral block (PVB). This approach has been shown to provide the best analgesia with the lowest rate of cancer recurrence.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0195"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">9</span></a> Although the incidence of complications in PVB is low, and can be reduced even further using ultrasound guidance,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0200"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">10</span></a> very few anaesthesiologists are entirely confident using the technique. Nevertheless, since the 2011 study published by Blanco et al., a number of ultrasound-guided interfascial nerve blocks using a peripheral instead of a paravertebral approach have been introduced. These new techniques are equally effective, but are safer and easier to perform.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0205"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">11,12</span></a> One of the most important of these peripheral blocks is the intercostal branches block in the midaxillary line (BRILMA, in its Spanish acronym), in which local anaesthetic is administered between the anterior serratus and external intercostal muscles. However, there is as yet insufficient evidence to support the effectiveness of this technique.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0190"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8,12</span></a></p><p id="par0015" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Technological advances, such as the introduction of intravenous (propofol and remifentanil) and inhalation (sevoflurane and desflurane) anaesthetic agents with an almost ideal pharmacokinetic profile,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0215"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">13</span></a> together with ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia techniques<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0175"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5,7–12</span></a> and the use of laryngeal masks for airway management,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0220"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">14</span></a> have improved both recovery rates and patient satisfaction, and precluded the need for opioids.</p><p id="par0020" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">As a result of these new developments in surgical and anaesthetic techniques, breast cancer surgery is increasingly being performed on an outpatient basis, or with an overnight hospital stay. In this new scenario, anaesthesiologists need to exercise management skills, and must maximise patient satisfaction while ensuring a high level of effectiveness and efficiency. To achieve this, indicators must be used to detect areas of improvement, decide when the patient is ready for discharge, and actively participate in follow-up.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0225"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">15</span></a></p><p id="par0025" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The Postoperative Quality Recovery Scale (PQRS)<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0230"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">16</span></a> has been validated to assess postoperative recovery. The questionnaire uses 6 domains (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0005">Table 1</a>) to assess complete patient recovery. It can be used to define immediate recovery, and more importantly, to establish when the patient is able to return to work, which is the ultimate goal of routine medical practice. As such, the scale is a good indicator of quality.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0005"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0030" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Mindful of the importance of measuring recovery after breast surgery, the primary objective of this study was to use the PQRS to quantify postoperative recovery from non-reconstructive breast surgery using general anaesthesia plus either PVB or BRILMA. The secondary objective was to compare the 2 locoregional analgesia techniques used in terms of recovery, and therefore safety, in all PQRS domains.</p></span><span id="sec0010" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0070">Materials and methods</span><p id="par0035" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Following approval from the hospital's ethics committee (authorisation no. PI 15-328), we conducted a prospective observational study over a period of 6 months. Subjects were women scheduled for non-reconstructive breast surgery for cancer. All subjects signed an informed consent form before taking part in the study. The inclusion criteria were: age ≥18 years, body mass index <25, ASA physical status I–III and ability to understand and complete the PQRS questionnaire (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0005">Table 1</a>) and rate their pain from 0 to 10 on a numeric scale (NRS). Exclusion criteria were: known difficult airway, difficulty in evaluating pain or unable to complete the questionnaire, allergy to any of the study drugs, contraindicated for regional anaesthesia (coagulation disorders, infection or haematoma in the proximity of the puncture site) or unwillingness to continue with the study.</p><p id="par0040" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">All patients received general anaesthesia and were randomised to the regional technique according to whether the date of their surgery fell on an even (PVB group) or uneven (BRILMA) date. All patients completed the PQRS questionnaire (baseline data) before anaesthesia. The locoregional block was performed prior to anaesthesia induction.</p><p id="par0045" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">A total of 60 patients were included in the study; all nerve blocks were performed on awake patients, using an ultrasound device (Siemens Acuson P300™) with a high frequency linear transducer (6–15<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MHz). A Stimuplex<span class="elsevierStyleSup">®</span> 22<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>G 100<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mm needle (B. Braun Medical) was used in the BRILMA group, and a Touhy 22 G (Perican<span class="elsevierStyleSup">®</span>, B. Braun Medical) in the PVB group. Once the tip of the needle had been inserted and confirmed by negative aspiration, 2<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ml of local anaesthetic was instilled to confirm correct placement of the needle under ultrasound vision. Following this, up to 20<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ml of 0.25% bupivacaíne was administered to patients in both groups.</p><p id="par0050" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Group PVB: a sterile field was created and the patient was placed in a seated position. The ultrasound transducer was positioned parallel to the spinal column and passed from cranial to caudal to locate thoracic vertebra T4. Once this had been identified, the transducer was placed horizontal to the spinal column to locate the paravertebral space ipsilateral to the breast of interest. Once this had been identified, the needle was inserted in plane from lateral to medial and advanced until it reached the paravertebral space, where the anaesthetic was administered and observed to spread within the space (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0005">Fig. 1</a>).</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0005"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0055" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">BRILMA group: The patient was placed in a supine position, with the arm ipsilateral to the breast of interest extended. The transducer was placed along the midaxillary line and the needle was inserted in plane from a cranial to caudal direction and carefully advanced under observation to the space between the anterior serratus and external intercostal muscles. Once it had been correctly positioned, the anaesthetic was administered while observing the spread of the solution in the target area (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0010">Fig. 2</a>).</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0010"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0060" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Both techniques were performed in the operating room following placement of a peripheral venous catheter, and with the patient under 3-lead electrocardiogram, non-invasive arterial pressure and peripheral arterial oxygen saturation monitoring. None of the study patients received premedication. After the corresponding locoregional nerve block had been administered, propofol (2–2.5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg/kg) was administered and hypnosis was monitored using a SedLine<span class="elsevierStyleSup">®</span> sensor and Radical-7<span class="elsevierStyleSup">®</span> hand held monitor (Masimo, Irvine, CA, USA) until a Patient State Index score (a numerical value obtained from 4 channels of encephalographic data) of 30–40 had been achieved. Following this, a Supreme<span class="elsevierStyleSup">®</span> laryngeal mask adjusted to the patient's weight was inserted. Anaesthesia was maintained with propofol TCI (2–5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>μg/ml) and ventilation was adjusted to maintain normocapnia. All patients received the same postoperative analgesia regimen: 1<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>g intravenous paracetamol, and 4<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg ondansetron 30<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>min before completion of surgery to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting. After completion of surgery and removal of the laryngeal mask, the patients were transferred to the post anaesthesia care unit (PACU).</p><p id="par0065" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The PQRS was administered again 15<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>min after transfer to the PACU. Patients were transferred from the PACU to the ward when they reported no pain (NPS score of less than 3), no nausea, and no other surgery-related complications. Patients reporting pain were given 2<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg morphine hydrochloride every 5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>min up to a maximum dose of 0.15<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg/kg until an NPS score of <3 was reported. The day after surgery, the patient was seen in the Breast Unit, where the PQRS was administered again.</p><p id="par0070" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In all cases, the questionnaire was administered by a trained nurse, who also noted any additional analgesia required after surgery (mg of morphine hydrochloride), the onset of adverse effects, such as postoperative nausea and/or vomiting, urinary retention, somnolence, the length of stay in the PACU, and patient satisfaction (rated as very satisfied, satisfied, neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, dissatisfied) at 24<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>h post surgery. Complications related to the regional anaesthesia technique and difficulties encountered during administration were rated by the anaesthesiologist on a verbal scale (easy, rather difficult, difficult).</p><p id="par0075" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">All patients followed up 1 month after the intervention, at which time the PQRS was again administered in order to evaluate postoperative recovery.</p><p id="par0080" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Study variables were first analysed using descriptive techniques. Continuous variables were defined using the mean as the measure of central tendency, and the standard deviation as the measure of dispersion. Qualitative variables were expressed as absolute number and percentage. Following this, study groups (PVB and BRILMA) were compared by means of a bivariant analysis. In the case of a continuous contrast variable, the independent samples t test was used, and in the case of a categorical contrast variable, the statistics were calculated by means of the chi-square test. A <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analysis was performed using PASW<span class="elsevierStyleSup">®</span> v17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).</p></span><span id="sec0015" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0075">Results</span><p id="par0085" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">A total of 60 female patients were included in the study. All had been scheduled for breast surgery under general anaesthesia, 25 received general anaesthesia combined with PVB, and 35 receive general anaesthesia combined with BRILMA. Patient demographics, physical status, surgical procedure, duration of surgery and length of stay in the PACU are summarised in <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0010">Table 2</a>. Both groups were homogeneous and comparable in terms of the study variables.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0010"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0090" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Based on the results of the PQRS, total recovery was achieved in 95.25% of patients in the immediate postoperative period (15<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>min PACU), in 99.07% at discharge, and in 99.25% at 1 month post surgery. No significant differences were observed between groups in the overall score or the scores recorded for each domain. The scores for each domain are shown in <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0015">Table 3</a>.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0015"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0095" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In all patients, recovery was sufficient to enable them to be discharged home directly from the PACU. In the nociceptive domain, scores were excellent, despite the fact that opioids were not administered in either group. The percentages of recovery with respect to baseline values in each PQRS domain are shown in <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0020">Table 4</a> (entire sample), and in <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0025">Table 5</a> (BRILMA vs PVB).</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0020"></elsevierMultimedia><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0025"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0100" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Overall patient perception was 3.5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>1.30 (4.1<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.8 in the BRILMA group and 3.2<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>1.2 in the PVB group) in the immediate postoperative period (in the PACU), 3.8<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.9 (4.2<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.7 in the BRILMA group and 3.9<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.8 in the PVB group) at the time of discharge (the day after the intervention), and 4.5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.5 (4.8<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.2 in the BRILMA group and 4.4<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.6 in the PVB group). No significant differences were observed between groups (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.01).</p><p id="par0105" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Six patients presented postoperative nausea and vomiting (4 BRILMA and 2 PVB), which resolved in all cases with the IV administration of a 4<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg bolus of ondansetron. In 5 patients (3 BRILMA and 2 PVB), postoperative pain was treated in the PACU with morphine (2<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg bolus every 5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>min until an NRS score of less than 3, up to a maximum dose of 0.15<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg/kg/h). In all cases, 2 boluses were required. With regard to locoregional anaesthesia-related complications, 1 case of suspected pneumothorax was reported (PVB group). The patient was admitted and the episode was resolved using a conservation approach. Another patient (BRILMA group) reported distal paresthesia in the right hand, which resolved spontaneously. Length of stay in the PACU did not differ significantly between groups (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0010">Table 2</a>).</p><p id="par0110" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In each case, the anaesthesiologist rated the difficulty involved in performing the technique as follows: easy, in 35 cases (25 in the BRILMA group and 10 in the PVB group), rather difficult in 15 cases (10 in the BRILMA group and 5 in the PVB group), and difficult in 10 cases (all in the BRILMA group). Patient satisfaction at 24<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>h post surgery was rated as very satisfied in 30 cases (20 in the BRILMA group and 10 in the PVB group), satisfied in 20 cases (10 in the BRILMA group and 10 in the PVB group), and neither satisfied nor dissatisfied in 10 cases (5 in the BRILMA group and 5 in the PVB group). None of the patients rated their experience as unsatisfied. When asked whether they would agree to the same anaesthesia technique if they had to undergo another intervention, all responses were affirmative.</p></span><span id="sec0020" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0080">Discussion</span><p id="par0115" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">All healthcare professionals involved in the field of surgery share a common goal: to maximise efficacy, safety and efficiency in all procedures in order to achieve the best possible outcome and optimise the patient's recovery and post surgery quality of life. In such multimodal teams, the anaesthesiologist's experience and ability to ensure the patient's well being and safety during the perioperative period are a fundamental part of the process of care.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0235"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">17–19</span></a> This is even more important in cancer surgery, in which the impact of anaesthetics and analgesics on the immunological and inflammatory systems and on angiogenesis has been well documented. However, due to the heterogeneity of studies on the impact of anaesthesia on cancer recurrence, no particular anaesthesia technique has been shown to be superior to any other.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0250"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">20,21</span></a></p><p id="par0120" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Most quality indicators for surgical outcomes consider factors such as the rate of admission, re-admission and cancellations, serious complications, postoperative nausea and vomiting, postoperative pain, and time to discharge home or transfer to the ward.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0225"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">15</span></a> Nevertheless, the quality of our work and its effect on the patient's life is best judged in scientific and technical terms by the complete recovery of our patients.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0260"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">22</span></a> In this study, we used the PQRS questionnaire–a validated, sensitive and practical clinical research and management instrument–to measure quality of recovery at various different levels.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0230"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">16</span></a> After comparing the means of the overall and domain-specific scores obtained from the PQRS, we obtained a far higher score than that reported for general anaesthesia. Our results confirm the quality of postoperative recovery after a multimodal anaesthesia strategy combining general anaesthesia with ultrasound-guided regional techniques (PVB or BRILMA). With this approach, full recovery in the immediate postoperative period was achieved in over 95% of cases. However, our results must be viewed in the context of our limited sample size, and the fact that the aim of the study was not to compare the multimodal approach against general anaesthesia, but rather to evaluate perioperative recovery following 2 ultrasound-guided combined anaesthesia techniques.</p><p id="par0125" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Most anaesthesiologists are primarily concerned with the physiological safety of their patients, and in most protocols this will determine when the patient is discharged home. However, our anaesthesia and analgesia strategy also determines other medium and long-term outcomes. Two clear examples of this are chronic acute postoperative pain<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0260"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">22–26</span></a> and the relationship between anaesthesia and tumour recurrence.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0250"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">20,21</span></a></p><p id="par0130" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Chronic pain after breast surgery, which occurs in between 17% and 57% of cases,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0275"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">25</span></a> is thought to be caused by several different factors, including age – it is more prevalent among young patients–anxiety and depression. However, the main causative factors are the type of surgery and the onset of acute postoperative pain.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0265"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">23–25</span></a> Multimodal analgesic techniques block central sensitisation secondary to the incision and resulting inflammation, thus providing effective pain management and preventing chronicity. Given the multitude of factors involved in chronic pain, however, it is important to approach this phenomenon from a comprehensive, perioperative perspective, instead of focussing on mere pain management. This means providing patient education and information, helping them control their anxiety, tailoring the multimodal anaesthesia–analgesia technique to the needs of each patient and the requirements of each procedure, and providing good postoperative follow-up.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0285"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">27</span></a></p><p id="par0135" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">On this basis, paravertebral or fascial blockade achieves excellent analgesia with minimal opioid administration in the perioperative, early and late postoperative period. This should improve scores in the nociceptive domain, which in turn hastens complete short-term recovery. Nevertheless, in our patients rapid recovery was not limited to pain, but was also observed in other short- and long-term domains. In other words, we achieved faster recovery rates than those reported by other authors using the same scale. In Royse et al.,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0230"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">16</span></a> recovery rates improved over time, with physiological recovery being achieved within 40<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>min en in 34% of cases. By the third postoperative day, comprehensive recovery (in all study domains) was only achieved in 11% of cases: 48.7% in the nociceptive domain, 81.3% in the emotional domain, 68.8% in the performance of activities of daily living, and only 33.5% in the cognitive domain. Despite these low recovery scores, 95.8% of patients were either satisfied or very satisfied with the anaesthesia technique used. In our study, recovery occurred earlier; we believe this was because our patients were not premedicated with benzodiazepines, and did not require intraoperative hypnotics or opiates due to the combined regional anaesthesia strategy.</p><p id="par0140" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">After analysing our results, we can conclude that, as pain is a complex symptom that is influenced by psychological, cognitive, emotional and sociocultural factors, effective pain management will have a positive effect not only on nociceptive recovery but also on the other domains studied. This effect is not limited to the immediate postoperative period, but continues over long-term follow-up, as shown by the results obtained at 1 month post surgery. This accelerated postoperative recovery is even more important in cancer surgery, as it will enable patients to start radiotherapy or chemotherapy at an earlier stage, and thus improve their long-term prognosis.</p><p id="par0145" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Locoregional analgesia techniques, either thoracic paravertebral block (considered the gold standard regional technique for breast surgery) or interfascial blocks, control pain and minimise the need for opioids. This is turn reduces the risk of the appearance of secondary effects both during and immediately after surgery. Although we, the authors, have considerable experience in interfascial blocks,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0190"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8,28</span></a> the technique is still in its infancy, and we acknowledge that well-designed multicentre clinical trials are needed to evaluate their advantages over PVBs. However, studies showing their usefulness as an analgesic technique in breast surgery should not be overlooked,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0295"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">29,30</span></a> and the results of this study have shown interfascial techniques to be on a par with paravertebral blockade from the perspective of complete patient recovery.</p><p id="par0150" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Our study has the following limitations: First, it was carried out at a single site, by a single research team. The anaesthesiologist performing the blockade was familiar with both paravertebral and interfascial block techniques, and with the use of ultrasound to guide target location. Despite this, the serratus-intercostal block used in this study was only introduced recently, and the concentration and volume of local anaesthetic administered are those recommended by Diéguez et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0190"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8</span></a>; we cannot be sure whether a different concentration or volume would have affected our results. Another drawback involves the limitation inherent to the assessment scales used in our study, in the sense that repeat administration of the same questionnaire could cause a “learning” bias that would affect our results. However, this same bias would be present in other studies using the PQRS.</p><p id="par0155" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In conclusion, both PVB and BRILMA, in the multimodal context of this study, achieve excellent analgesia that considerably reduces the need for opiates, and the scores obtained from the PQRS are far higher than those reported in the context of general anaesthesia. The good results obtained in the nociceptive domain lead in turn to higher scores in the physiological, emotional, functional, cognitive, and overall patient perspective domains.</p></span><span id="sec0025" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0085">Conflict of interest</span><p id="par0160" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.</p></span></span>" "textoCompletoSecciones" => array:1 [ "secciones" => array:10 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "xres762598" "titulo" => "Abstract" "secciones" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0005" "titulo" => "Introduction" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0010" "titulo" => "Material and methods" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0015" "titulo" => "Results" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0020" "titulo" => "Conclusions" ] ] ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec764110" "titulo" => "Keywords" ] 2 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "xres762597" "titulo" => "Resumen" "secciones" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0025" "titulo" => "Introducción" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0030" "titulo" => "Material y métodos" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0035" "titulo" => "Resultados" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0040" "titulo" => "Conclusiones" ] ] ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec764111" "titulo" => "Palabras clave" ] 4 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0005" "titulo" => "Introduction" ] 5 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0010" "titulo" => "Materials and methods" ] 6 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0015" "titulo" => "Results" ] 7 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0020" "titulo" => "Discussion" ] 8 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0025" "titulo" => "Conflict of interest" ] 9 => array:1 [ "titulo" => "References" ] ] ] "pdfFichero" => "main.pdf" "tienePdf" => true "fechaRecibido" => "2015-12-09" "fechaAceptado" => "2016-03-12" "PalabrasClave" => array:2 [ "en" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "clase" => "keyword" "titulo" => "Keywords" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec764110" "palabras" => array:5 [ 0 => "Breast cancer surgery" 1 => "General anaesthesia" 2 => "Total quality management" 3 => "Postoperative recovery" 4 => "Regional anaesthesia" ] ] ] "es" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "clase" => "keyword" "titulo" => "Palabras clave" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec764111" "palabras" => array:5 [ 0 => "Cirugía de cáncer de mama" 1 => "Anestesia general" 2 => "Gestión de calidad total" 3 => "Recuperación postanestésica" 4 => "Anestesia regional" ] ] ] ] "tieneResumen" => true "resumen" => array:2 [ "en" => array:3 [ "titulo" => "Abstract" "resumen" => "<span id="abst0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0010">Introduction</span><p id="spar0005" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">The quality of postoperative recovery is one of the most important among all the quality indicators used in clinical situations. This is even more important after cancer surgery. Our aim was to evaluate this after non-reconstructive breast surgery under general anaesthesia and paravertebral blockade or serratus–intercostal plane blockade, in the early and late post-operative period.</p></span> <span id="abst0010" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0015">Material and methods</span><p id="spar0010" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">A prospective observational study was conducted on 60 patients (25 paravertebral blockade group and 35 serratus–intercostal plane blockade group) scheduled for non-reconstructive breast surgery during a 6 month period. Every patient received general anaesthesia and were randomised to receive either paravertebral blockade or serratus–intercostal plane blockade. The quality of post-anaesthetic recovery was quantified by Postoperative Quality Recovery Scale, which is used to assess physiological, nociceptive, emotional, autonomy, cognitive and general state domains at different times: baseline (before surgery), 15<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>min after the end of surgery, at discharge to home, and one month after surgery.</p></span> <span id="abst0015" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0020">Results</span><p id="spar0015" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">A total recovery of 95.93% was achieved in the early postoperative period (15<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>min PACU), 99.07% at discharge to home, and 99.25% at one month after the intervention. No significant differences were found between groups in total score or in each evaluated area.</p></span> <span id="abst0020" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0025">Conclusions</span><p id="spar0020" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">A progressive improvement was observed in the scores assessed with the Postoperative Quality Recovery Scale, reaching values that would allow the discharge to home and early return to usual active life from the immediate postoperative period, with no significant differences between the 2 analgesic techniques. Savings in opioid use and the excellent recovery were observed in all measured domains observed.</p></span>" "secciones" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0005" "titulo" => "Introduction" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0010" "titulo" => "Material and methods" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0015" "titulo" => "Results" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0020" "titulo" => "Conclusions" ] ] ] "es" => array:3 [ "titulo" => "Resumen" "resumen" => "<span id="abst0025" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0035">Introducción</span><p id="spar0025" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">La cuantificación de la calidad de la recuperación posquirúrgica destaca entre los indicadores de calidad utilizados en clínica. Ello es más importante aún tras cirugía oncológica. Nuestro objetivo fue evaluar la calidad de la recuperación tras cirugía no reconstructiva de mama tras anestesia general combinada con bloqueo paravertebral versus bloqueo del espacio serrato-intercostal en el postoperatorio inmediato y tardío.</p></span> <span id="abst0030" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0040">Material y métodos</span><p id="spar0030" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Estudio observacional prospectivo en 60 pacientes programadas para cirugía no reconstructiva de mama en un periodo de 6 meses bajo anestesia combinada general y bloqueo paravertebral (25 pacientes) o bloqueo del espacio serrato-intercostal (35 pacientes). La calidad de la recuperación postanestésica se midió con la escala Postoperative Quality Recovery Scale, valorando los dominios fisiológico, nociceptivo, emocional, autonomía, cognitivo y estado general en diferentes momentos: basal (previo a cirugía), 15<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>min tras finalizar la intervención, al alta hospitalaria y al mes postintervención.</p></span> <span id="abst0035" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0045">Resultados</span><p id="spar0035" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Se consiguió una recuperación total del 95,93% en el postoperatorio inmediato (15<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>min unidad de recuperación postoperatoria [URPA]), del 99,07% al alta y del 99,25% al mes de la intervención. No se encontraron diferencias significativas entre ambos grupos ni en la puntuación total ni en las diversas áreas medidas por la escala.</p></span> <span id="abst0040" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0050">Conclusiones</span><p id="spar0040" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Con la técnica descrita se ha objetivado una alta puntuación de recuperación con la Postoperative Quality Recovery Scale, que posibilitaría el alta en el postoperatorio inmediato y la vuelta precoz a la vida activa habitual. En ambos grupos se observó un ahorro de opioides y una recuperación excelente de todos los dominios evaluados, sin diferencias significativas.</p></span>" "secciones" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0025" "titulo" => "Introducción" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0030" "titulo" => "Material y métodos" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0035" "titulo" => "Resultados" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0040" "titulo" => "Conclusiones" ] ] ] ] "NotaPie" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "☆" "nota" => "<p class="elsevierStyleNotepara" id="npar0025">Please cite this article as: Pérez Herrero MA, López Álvarez S, Fadrique Fuentes A, Manzano Lorefice F, Bartolomé Bartolomé C, González de Zárate J. Calidad de la recuperación posquirúrgica tras cirugía de mama. Anestesia general combinada con bloqueo paravertebral versus bloqueo del espacio serrato-intercostal. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2016;63:564–571.</p>" ] ] "multimedia" => array:7 [ 0 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Figure 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 972 "Ancho" => 1585 "Tamanyo" => 150569 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0045" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral approach. Image obtained with the transducer positioned as described in the text. The arrow shows the target local anaesthetic injection site, behind which the corresponding pleural “ballooning” should be observed. IICM: Internal intercostal membrane; PL: pleura; PVS: paravertebral space; TP: transverse process.</p>" ] ] 1 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0010" "etiqueta" => "Figure 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr2.jpeg" "Alto" => 1125 "Ancho" => 1502 "Tamanyo" => 120246 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0050" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">BRILMA or serratus–intercostal block. Image obtained with the transducer positioned on the midaxillary line, as described in the text. The left side of the image faces cranial and the right faces caudal. The arrows show the position of the needle. AL: local anaesthetic; MIc: intercostal muscles; M Serr: serratus muscle; pl: pleura; 4c: fourth rib; 5c: fifth rib.</p>" ] ] 2 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "tbl0005" "etiqueta" => "Table 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at1" "detalle" => "Table " "rol" => "short" ] ] "tabla" => array:1 [ "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Domain \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Parameters measured \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Observations \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">Physiologic</span><br>Score range: 9–27 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Arterial pressure, heart and breathing rate, temperature, and SpO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span>. Airway management, level of agitation, level of consciousness and activity on command relate to airway safety and emergence \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">The domain is tested in the immediate postoperative period to assess “home readiness” for day stay surgery \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">Nociceptive</span><br>Score range: 2–10 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Patient's subjective perception of pain and nausea at the time of testing \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Likert face scale (1–5) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">Emotional</span><br>Score range: 2–10 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Feelings of anxiety and depression at the time of testing \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Likert face scale (1–5) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">Activities of daily living</span><br>Score range: 4–12 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Recovery of activities of daily living Ability to stand, walk and dress without assistance, and ability to eat and drink \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Scale: 3<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>easily, 2<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>with difficulty and 1<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>not at all \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">Cognitive</span><br>Score range: 0–45 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Five test assess orientation, verbal memory, executive functioning, attention and concentration \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Derived from extensively used neurocognitive tests with their respective scales \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">Overall patient perspective</span><br>Score range: 4–20 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Patients rate their recovery with respect to their activities of daily living, clarity of thought, ability to work and satisfaction with anaesthetic care. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Five-point scale. Return to work is only applied to those who currently work and intend to return after surgery<br>Not included in the analysis as it does not measure recovery with respect to baseline \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab1259803.png" ] ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0055" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Postoperative Quality Recovery Scale domains.</p>" ] ] 3 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "tbl0010" "etiqueta" => "Table 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at2" "detalle" => "Table " "rol" => "short" ] ] "tabla" => array:2 [ "leyenda" => "<p id="spar0065" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">The PVB group received paravertebral block. No significant differences were observed between groups (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.05).</p>" "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><th class="td" title="table-head " align="" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">PVB (n<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>25) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">BRILMA (n<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>35) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Age (years) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">55<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>6 (31–87) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">54<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>10 (29–65) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Weight (kg) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">55<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>9 (45–98) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">50<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>18 (47–90) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Height (cm) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">1.57<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>5 (1.45–1.82) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">1.60<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>6 (1.54–1.85) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">ASA status \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">I (60%), II (40%) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">I (55%), II (35%), III (10%) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Procedure \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Tumorectomy<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>sentinel lymph node (15)<br>Tumorectomy<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>lymphadenectomy (6)<br>Mastectomy<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>lymphadenectomy (4)<br>Lymphadenectomy (0) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Tumorectomy<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>sentinel lymph node (21)<br>Tumorectomy<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>lymph node (6)<br>Mastectomy<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>lymph node (5)<br>Lymphadenectomy (0) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Location \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Left (15), right (10) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Left (22), right (13) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Duration of surgery (min) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">45<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>32.3 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">40<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>34.7 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Stay in PACU (min) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">65.4<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>15.32 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">55.34<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>16.12 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab1259806.png" ] ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0060" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Patient demographics, physical status, procedures and times.</p>" ] ] 4 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "tbl0015" "etiqueta" => "Table 3" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at3" "detalle" => "Table " "rol" => "short" ] ] "tabla" => array:2 [ "leyenda" => "<p id="spar0075" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">The table shows the means and standard deviations of the absolute numerical scores obtained in the physiologic, nociceptive, emotional, functional and cognitive domains of all study patients (first row in each subgroup: total), in the BRILMA group (second row) and the PVB group (third row); at different study time points: baseline or preoperative, in the PACU, at discharge, and at 1 month. No significant differences were observed between groups (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.01).</p>" "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><th class="td" title="table-head " align="" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Physiologic \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Nociceptive \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Emotional \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Functional \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Cognitive \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " rowspan="3" align="left" valign="top">Baseline</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Total \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">24.27<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>2.10 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">7.12<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>2.81 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">7.08<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>1.83 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">9.91<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>2.20 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">32<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>5.81 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">BRILMA \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">24.35<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>3.00 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">7.21<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>2.51 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">7.42<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>1.68 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">9.38<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>2.13 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">27.56<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>4.65 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">PVB \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">24.16<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>2.02 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">7.00<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>2.22 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">6.64<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>1.92 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">10.64<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>1.80 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">38.04<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>6.82 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " rowspan="3" align="left" valign="top">PACU</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Total \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">24.29<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>1.90 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">6.83<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>1.83 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">6.59<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>3.10 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">9.95<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>1.35 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">29.39<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>6.67 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">BRILMA \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">24.44<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>2.52 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">6.66<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>2.05 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">7.03<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>2.95 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">9.31<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>1.87 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">27.17<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>7.89 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">PVB \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">24.08<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>2.10 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">7.08<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>1.67 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">5.96<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>3.34 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">10.87<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>1.51 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">32.67<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>6.98 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " rowspan="3" align="left" valign="top">At discharge</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Total \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">24.25<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>2.21 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">7.07<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>2.45 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">6.90<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>2.81 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">9.76<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>1.37 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">31.59<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>5.98 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">BRILMA \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">24.35<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>2.19 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">7.15<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>2.53 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">7.03<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>2.67 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">9.21<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>1.56 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">27.26<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>6.17 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">PVB \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">24.14<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>2.17 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">6.96<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>2.34 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">6.72<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>2.98 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">10.52<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.83 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">37.48<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>5.87 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " rowspan="3" align="left" valign="top">At 1 month</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Total \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">24.22<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>2.68 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">7.10<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>2.82 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">6.93<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>2.8 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">9.91<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>1.80 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">31.76<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>6.50 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">BRILMA \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">24.26<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>2.67 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">7.20<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>2.63 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">7.23<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>2.65 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">9.41<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>2.31 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">27.46<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>7.65 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">PVB \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">24.16<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>2.56 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">6.96<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>2.91 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">6.52<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>2.97 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">10.6<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>1.38 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">37.88<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>4.58 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab1259805.png" ] ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0070" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Postoperative Quality Recovery Scale domain scores.</p>" ] ] 5 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "tbl0020" "etiqueta" => "Table 4" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at4" "detalle" => "Table " "rol" => "short" ] ] "tabla" => array:2 [ "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><th class="td" title="table-head " align="" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">PACU \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">At discharge \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">At 1 month \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Physiologic \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">100.08<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tblfn0005"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">99.92 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">99.79 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Nociceptive \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">96.93 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">99.3 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">99.72 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Emotional \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">93.08 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">97.46 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">97.88 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Functional \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">100.4<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tblfn0005"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">98.49 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">100 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Cognitive \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">91.84 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">98.72 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">99.25 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Total \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">95.93 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">99.07 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">99.25 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab1259804.png" ] ] ] "notaPie" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "tblfn0005" "etiqueta" => "a" "nota" => "<p class="elsevierStyleNotepara" id="npar0005">Values shown indicate percentage of recovery with respect to the means of the absolute numerical scores obtained with respect to baseline. Note the better scores with respect to baseline obtained in the PACU in the physiologic and functional domains. This is no doubt due to pre-operative anxiety (baseline time point) and the limitations of the PQRS.</p> <p class="elsevierStyleNotepara" id="npar0010">No significant differences were observed between groups (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.01).</p>" ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0080" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Percentage of patients showing total recovery according to the Postoperative Quality Recovery Scale.</p>" ] ] 6 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "tbl0025" "etiqueta" => "Table 5" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at5" "detalle" => "Table " "rol" => "short" ] ] "tabla" => array:2 [ "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><th class="td" title="table-head " align="" valign="top" scope="col"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " colspan="2" align="center" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">PACU</th><th class="td" title="table-head " colspan="2" align="center" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">At discharge</th><th class="td" title="table-head " colspan="2" align="center" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">At 1 month</th></tr><tr title="table-row"><th class="td" title="table-head " align="" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">BRILMA \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">PVB \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">BRILMA \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">PVB \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">BRILMA \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">PVB \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Physiologic \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">100.37<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tblfn0010"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">99.67 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">100 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">99.92 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">99.63 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">100 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Nociceptive \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">92.37 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">100.14<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tblfn0010"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">99.17 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">99.43 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">99.86 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">99.43 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Emotional \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">94.74 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">89.76 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">94.74 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">101.2<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tblfn0010"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">97.44 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">98.19 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Functional \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">99.25 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">102.16<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tblfn0010"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">98.19 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">98.87 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">100.32<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tblfn0010"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">99.62 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Cognitive \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">98.48 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">84.3 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">98.91 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">98.53 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">99.64 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">99.58 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Total \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">98.23 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">93.20 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">98.79 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">99.24 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">99.53 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">99.65 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab1259802.png" ] ] ] "notaPie" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "tblfn0010" "etiqueta" => "a" "nota" => "<p class="elsevierStyleNotepara" id="npar0015">Values shown indicate percentage of recovery with respect to the means of the absolute numerical scores obtained with respect to baseline. Note the better scores obtained in the PACU in the physiologic and functional domains in the BRILMA group and in the nociceptive and emotional domains in the PVB group. This is no doubt due to both preoperative anxiety (baseline time point), that affected all study domains, and the heterogeneity of the sample.</p> <p class="elsevierStyleNotepara" id="npar0020">No significant differences were observed between groups (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.01).</p>" ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0090" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Recovery percentage, BRILMA vs PVB.</p>" ] ] ] "bibliografia" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "References" "seccion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "bibs0005" "bibliografiaReferencia" => array:30 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0155" "etiqueta" => "1" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "comentario" => "Available from: <a class="elsevierStyleInterRef" id="intr0010" href="http://encr.eu/images/docs/factsheets/breast-factsheets.pdf">http://encr.eu/images/docs/factsheets/breast-factsheets.pdf</a> [accessed 02.09.15]" "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "J.E. Tyczynski" 1 => "F. Bray" 2 => "D.M. Parkin" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Libro" => array:2 [ "fecha" => "December 2002" "editorial" => "International Agency for Research on Cancer. ENCR Cancer Fact Sheets" ] ] ] ] ] ] 1 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0160" "etiqueta" => "2" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Paravertebral blocks in breast cancer surgery: is there a difference in postoperative pain, nausea, and vomiting?" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "R. Aufforth" 1 => "J. Jain" 2 => "J. Morreale" 3 => "R. Baumgarten" 4 => "J. Falk" 5 => "C. Wesen" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1245/s10434-011-1899-5" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Ann Surg Oncol" "fecha" => "2012" "volumen" => "19" "paginaInicial" => "548" "paginaFinal" => "552" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21769470" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 2 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0165" "etiqueta" => "3" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Brief reports: paravertebral block for anesthesia: a systematic review" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "P. Thavaneswaran" 1 => "G.E. Rudkin" 2 => "R.D. Cooter" 3 => "D.G. Moyes" 4 => "C.L. Perera" 5 => "G.J. Maddern" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181da82c8" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Anesth Analg" "fecha" => "2010" "volumen" => "110" "paginaInicial" => "1740" "paginaFinal" => "1744" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20448076" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 3 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0170" "etiqueta" => "4" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Does regional anaesthesia really improve outcome?" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "S.C. Kettner" 1 => "H. Willschke" 2 => "P. Marhofer" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1093/bja/aer340" "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "Br J Anaesth" "fecha" => "2011" "volumen" => "107" "numero" => "Suppl. 1" "paginaInicial" => "i90" "paginaFinal" => "i95" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22156274" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 4 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0175" "etiqueta" => "5" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Ultrasound-guided multilevel paravertebral blocks and total intravenous anesthesia improve the quality of recovery after ambulatory breast tumor resection" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "F.W. Abdallah" 1 => "P.J. Morgan" 2 => "T. Cil" 3 => "A. McNaught" 4 => "J.M. Escallon" 5 => "J.L. Semple" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1097/ALN.0000436117.52143.bc" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Anesthesiology" "fecha" => "2014" "volumen" => "120" "paginaInicial" => "703" "paginaFinal" => "713" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24071616" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 5 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0180" "etiqueta" => "6" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Efficacy and safety of paravertebral blocks in breast surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "S.U. Schnabel Reichl" 1 => "P. Kranke" 2 => "E.M. Pogatzki-Zahn" 3 => "P.K. Zahn" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1093/bja/aeq265" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Br J Anaesth" "fecha" => "2010" "volumen" => "105" "paginaInicial" => "842" "paginaFinal" => "852" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20947592" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 6 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0185" "etiqueta" => "7" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Effect of intravenous lidocaine on postoperative recovery of patients undergoing mastectomy: a double-bind, placebo-controlled randomized trial" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "A.S. Terkawi" 1 => "M.E. Durieux" 2 => "A. Gottschalk" 3 => "D. Brenin" 4 => "M. Tiouririne" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1097/AAP.0000000000000140" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Reg Anesth Pain Med" "fecha" => "2014" "volumen" => "39" "paginaInicial" => "472" "paginaFinal" => "477" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25275577" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 7 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0190" "etiqueta" => "8" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Abordaje guiado por ultrasonidos de los nervios intercostales en la línea media axilar para cirugía de mama no reconstructiva y de la axila" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "P. Diéguez" 1 => "M. Fajardo" 2 => "S. López" 3 => "P. Alfaro" 4 => "A. Pensado" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.redar.2013.04.002" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim" "fecha" => "2013" "volumen" => "60" "paginaInicial" => "365" "paginaFinal" => "370" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23742791" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 8 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0195" "etiqueta" => "9" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral blockade: a retrospective study of the incidence of complications" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "M.M. Pace" 1 => "B. Sharma" 2 => "J. Anderson-Dam" 3 => "K. Fleishmann" 4 => "L. Warren" 5 => "P. Stefanovich" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1213/ANE.0000000000001117" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Anesth Analg" "fecha" => "2016" "volumen" => "122" "paginaInicial" => "1186" "paginaFinal" => "1191" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26756911" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 9 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0200" "etiqueta" => "10" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Single injection paravertebral block for major cancer breast surgery" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "A. Kumar" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Anaesth Clin Pharmacol" "fecha" => "2009" "volumen" => "25" "paginaInicial" => "281" "paginaFinal" => "284" ] ] ] ] ] ] 10 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0205" "etiqueta" => "11" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Bloqueos guiados por ultrasonidos para cirugía mamaria" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "P. Diéguez" 1 => "P. Casas" 2 => "S. López" 3 => "M. Fajardo" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.redar.2015.11.003" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim" "fecha" => "2016" "volumen" => "63" "paginaInicial" => "159" "paginaFinal" => "167" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26776926" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 11 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0210" "etiqueta" => "12" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Serratus plane block: a novel ultrasound-guided thoracic wall nerve block" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "R. Blanco" 1 => "T. Parras" 2 => "J.G. McDonnell" 3 => "A. Prats-Galino" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1111/anae.12344" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Anaesthesia" "fecha" => "2013" "volumen" => "68" "paginaInicial" => "1107" "paginaFinal" => "1113" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23923989" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 12 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0215" "etiqueta" => "13" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Anestesia en cirugía ambulatoria. Anestesia fuera de quirófano" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "S. López Alvarez" 1 => "P. Diéguez García" 2 => "J. Juncal Díaz" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "LibroEditado" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Tomo I. Sección IV (Subespecialidades). Tratado de Anestesia" "serieFecha" => "2014" ] ] ] ] ] ] 13 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0220" "etiqueta" => "14" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Nuevas aportaciones de la mascarilla laríngea en cirugía ambulatoria. Contribución de la mascarilla laríngea Supreme" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "M. Zaballos García" 1 => "S. López Álvarez" 2 => "S. Agustí Martínez-Arcos" 3 => "T. Blanco Sánchez" 4 => "F. Bustos Molina" 5 => "P. Cabré Fabré" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Cir May Amb" "fecha" => "2012" "volumen" => "16" "paginaInicial" => "94" "paginaFinal" => "102" ] ] ] ] ] ] 14 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0225" "etiqueta" => "15" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Eficiencia en la utilización de bloques quirúrgicos. Definición de indicadores. Informes de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias. AIAQS Núm 2010/04" ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Libro" => array:1 [ "fecha" => "2012" ] ] ] ] ] ] 15 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0230" "etiqueta" => "16" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Development and feasibility of a scale to assess postoperative recovery: the post-operative quality recovery scale" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "C.F. Royse" 1 => "S. Newman" 2 => "F. Chung" 3 => "J. Stygall" 4 => "R.E. McKay" 5 => "J. Boldt" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181d960a9" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Anesthesiology" "fecha" => "2010" "volumen" => "113" "paginaInicial" => "892" "paginaFinal" => "905" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20601860" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 16 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0235" "etiqueta" => "17" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Quality and safety indicators in anesthesia: a systematic review" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "G. Haller" 1 => "J. Stoelwinder" 2 => "P.S. Mylkes" 3 => "J. McNeil" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181a1093b" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Anesthesiology" "fecha" => "2009" "volumen" => "110" "paginaInicial" => "1158" "paginaFinal" => "1175" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19352148" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 17 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0240" "etiqueta" => "18" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Long-term consequences of anesthetic management" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "D.I. Sessler" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181a913e1" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Anesthesiology" "fecha" => "2009" "volumen" => "111" "paginaInicial" => "1" "paginaFinal" => "4" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19512884" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 18 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0245" "etiqueta" => "19" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Calidad en anestesia" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "R.M. De Lille-Fuente" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Rev Mex Anesth" "fecha" => "2013" "volumen" => "36" "numero" => "Suppl. 1" "paginaInicial" => "S69" "paginaFinal" => "S74" ] ] ] ] ] ] 19 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0250" "etiqueta" => "20" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Impact of anesthesia on cancer recurrence" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "B.M. Lee" 1 => "J.P. Cata" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.redar.2015.04.003" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim" "fecha" => "2015" "volumen" => "62" "paginaInicial" => "570" "paginaFinal" => "575" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26026503" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 20 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0255" "etiqueta" => "21" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Can anesthetic technique for primary breast cancer surgery affect recurrence or metastasis?" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "A.K. Exadaktylos" 1 => "D.J. Buggy" 2 => "D.C. Moriarty" 3 => "E. Mascha" 4 => "D. Sessler" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Anesthesiology" "fecha" => "2006" "volumen" => "105" "paginaInicial" => "660" "paginaFinal" => "664" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17006061" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 21 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0260" "etiqueta" => "22" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Assessing recovery after ambulatory anaesthesia, measures of resumption of activities of daily living" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "J. Jakobsson" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1097/ACO.0b013e32834c3916" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Curr Opin Anaesthesiol" "fecha" => "2011" "volumen" => "24" "paginaInicial" => "601" "paginaFinal" => "604" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21945921" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 22 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0265" "etiqueta" => "23" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Regional anaesthesia to prevent chronic pain after surgery: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "M.H. Andreae" 1 => "D.A. Andreae" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1093/bja/aet213" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Br J Anaesth" "fecha" => "2013" "volumen" => "111" "paginaInicial" => "711" "paginaFinal" => "720" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23811426" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 23 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0270" "etiqueta" => "24" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Risk factors for chronic pain following breast cancer surgery: a prospective study" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "E.L. Poleshuck" 1 => "J. Katz" 2 => "C.H. Andrus" 3 => "L.A. Hogan" 4 => "B.F. Jung" 5 => "D.I. Kulick" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.jpain.2006.02.007" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Pain" "fecha" => "2006" "volumen" => "7" "paginaInicial" => "626" "paginaFinal" => "634" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16942948" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 24 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0275" "etiqueta" => "25" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Chronic post-surgical pain: 10 years on" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "W.A. Macrae" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Br J Anaesth" "fecha" => "2008" "volumen" => "101" "paginaInicial" => "7" "paginaFinal" => "86" ] ] ] ] ] ] 25 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0280" "etiqueta" => "26" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Persistent pain after breast cancer treatment: a critical review of risk factors and strategies for prevention" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "K.G. Andersen" 1 => "H. Kehlet" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Pain" "fecha" => "2011" "volumen" => "12" "paginaInicial" => "725" "paginaFinal" => "746" ] ] ] ] ] ] 26 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0285" "etiqueta" => "27" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Anestesia para cirugía de mama" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "S. López" 1 => "P. Diéguez" 2 => "R. Blanco" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "LibroEditado" => array:4 [ "titulo" => "Cirugía oncológica de la mama. Técnicas oncoplásticas y reconstructivas" "paginaInicial" => "355" "paginaFinal" => "363" "serieFecha" => "2013" ] ] ] ] ] ] 27 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0290" "etiqueta" => "28" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Abordaje ecoguiado de las ramas cutáneas de los nervios intercostales a nivel de la línea medio axilar para cirugía no reconstructiva de mama" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "M. Fajardo" 1 => "S. López" 2 => "P. Diéguez" 3 => "P. Alfaro" 4 => "F.J. García" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Cir May Amb" "fecha" => "2013" "volumen" => "18" "paginaInicial" => "3" "paginaFinal" => "6" ] ] ] ] ] ] 28 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0295" "etiqueta" => "29" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "comentario" => "[Japanese]" "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Serratus-intercostal plane block for breast surgery" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "Y. Ohgoshi" 1 => "M. Yokozuka" 2 => "K. Terajima" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Masui" "fecha" => "2015" "volumen" => "64" "paginaInicial" => "610" "paginaFinal" => "614" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26437549" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 29 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0300" "etiqueta" => "30" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Serratus anterior plane block: a new analgesic technique for post-thoracotomy pain" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "R. Madabushi" 1 => "S. Tewari" 2 => "S.K. Gautam" 3 => "A. Agarwal" 4 => "A. Agarwal" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Pain Physician" "fecha" => "2015" "volumen" => "18" "paginaInicial" => "E421" "paginaFinal" => "E424" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26000690" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "url" => "/23411929/0000006300000010/v1_201611250118/S2341192916300361/v1_201611250118/en/main.assets" "Apartado" => array:4 [ "identificador" => "34051" "tipo" => "SECCION" "en" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Original articles" "idiomaDefecto" => true ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" ] "PDF" => "https://static.elsevier.es/multimedia/23411929/0000006300000010/v1_201611250118/S2341192916300361/v1_201611250118/en/main.pdf?idApp=UINPBA00004N&text.app=https://www.elsevier.es/" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2341192916300361?idApp=UINPBA00004N" ]
Year/Month | Html | Total | |
---|---|---|---|
2023 March | 2 | 0 | 2 |
2019 April | 1 | 0 | 1 |
2018 November | 1 | 2 | 3 |
2018 March | 1 | 0 | 1 |
2016 December | 2 | 0 | 2 |