was read the article
array:24 [ "pii" => "S2341192922000944" "issn" => "23411929" "doi" => "10.1016/j.redare.2021.09.003" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2022-06-01" "aid" => "1389" "copyright" => "Sociedad Española de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor" "copyrightAnyo" => "2021" "documento" => "simple-article" "crossmark" => 1 "subdocumento" => "cor" "cita" => "Revista Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación (English Version). 2022;69:374-6" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "es" => array:19 [ "pii" => "S0034935621002681" "issn" => "00349356" "doi" => "10.1016/j.redar.2021.09.009" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2022-06-01" "aid" => "1389" "copyright" => "Sociedad Española de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor" "documento" => "simple-article" "crossmark" => 1 "subdocumento" => "cor" "cita" => "Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2022;69:374-6" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "es" => array:11 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Carta al Director</span>" "titulo" => "Efecto de la primera ola de la pandemia COVID-19 en la aplicación de los protocolos de recuperación intensificada perioperatoria según la percepción de los profesionales sanitarios" "tienePdf" => "es" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "es" "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "374" "paginaFinal" => "376" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "en" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Effect of the first wave of COVID-19 on the implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols based on perceptions of healthcare professionals" ] ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "es" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "es" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Figura 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 1532 "Ancho" => 2083 "Tamanyo" => 87978 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "es" => "<p id="spar0005" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Percepción de los encuestados sobre la adherencia a los protocolos ERAS antes y después de la pandemia (mínimo: 1; máximo: 10).</p>" ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "J.V. Lorente, J. Ripollés-Melchor, C. Aldecoa, A. Abad-Motos" "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "J.V." "apellidos" => "Lorente" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "J." "apellidos" => "Ripollés-Melchor" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "C." "apellidos" => "Aldecoa" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "A." "apellidos" => "Abad-Motos" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "en" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S2341192922000944" "doi" => "10.1016/j.redare.2021.09.003" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2341192922000944?idApp=UINPBA00004N" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S0034935621002681?idApp=UINPBA00004N" "url" => "/00349356/0000006900000006/v1_202205240628/S0034935621002681/v1_202205240628/es/main.assets" ] ] "itemSiguiente" => array:19 [ "pii" => "S2341192922000993" "issn" => "23411929" "doi" => "10.1016/j.redare.2022.06.005" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2022-06-01" "aid" => "1353" "copyright" => "Sociedad Española de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor" "documento" => "simple-article" "crossmark" => 1 "subdocumento" => "cor" "cita" => "Revista Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación (English Version). 2022;69:377-8" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "en" => array:10 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Letter to the Director</span>" "titulo" => "Clinical and organizational opportunities in the management of critical patients in pandemic COVID-19" "tienePdf" => "en" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en" "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "377" "paginaFinal" => "378" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Oportunidades clínicas y organizativas en el manejo de pacientes críticos en la pandemia COVID-19" ] ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "M. Varela-Durán, M. Martínez-Pillado" "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "M." "apellidos" => "Varela-Durán" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "M." "apellidos" => "Martínez-Pillado" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "es" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S003493562100205X" "doi" => "10.1016/j.redar.2021.06.001" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S003493562100205X?idApp=UINPBA00004N" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2341192922000993?idApp=UINPBA00004N" "url" => "/23411929/0000006900000006/v1_202207050820/S2341192922000993/v1_202207050820/en/main.assets" ] "itemAnterior" => array:18 [ "pii" => "S2341192922001019" "issn" => "23411929" "doi" => "10.1016/j.redare.2021.11.002" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2022-06-01" "aid" => "1404" "documento" => "simple-article" "crossmark" => 1 "subdocumento" => "cor" "cita" => "Revista Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación (English Version). 2022;69:373-4" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "en" => array:10 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Letter to the Director</span>" "titulo" => "“Letter to the Editor” response to Vives and Devereaux" "tienePdf" => "en" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en" "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "373" "paginaFinal" => "374" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "“Carta al Director” como comentario a la correspondiente de Vives y Devereaux" ] ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "R. Ferrandis, C. Cassinello, Pilar Sierra, J.V. Llau" "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "R." "apellidos" => "Ferrandis" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "C." "apellidos" => "Cassinello" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Pilar" "apellidos" => "Sierra" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "J.V." "apellidos" => "Llau" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "es" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S0034935621003005" "doi" => "10.1016/j.redar.2021.11.003" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S0034935621003005?idApp=UINPBA00004N" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2341192922001019?idApp=UINPBA00004N" "url" => "/23411929/0000006900000006/v1_202207050820/S2341192922001019/v1_202207050820/en/main.assets" ] "en" => array:16 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Letter to the Director</span>" "titulo" => "Effect of the first wave of COVID-19 on the implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols based on perceptions of healthcare professionals" "tieneTextoCompleto" => true "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "374" "paginaFinal" => "376" ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "autoresLista" => "J.V. Lorente, J. Ripollés-Melchor, C. Aldecoa, A. Abad-Motos" "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => array:4 [ "nombre" => "J.V." "apellidos" => "Lorente" "email" => array:1 [ 0 => "juanvictor.lorente@gmail.com" ] "referencia" => array:2 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] 1 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">*</span>" "identificador" => "cor0005" ] ] ] 1 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "J." "apellidos" => "Ripollés-Melchor" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">b</span>" "identificador" => "aff0010" ] ] ] 2 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "C." "apellidos" => "Aldecoa" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">c</span>" "identificador" => "aff0015" ] ] ] 3 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "A." "apellidos" => "Abad-Motos" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">b</span>" "identificador" => "aff0010" ] ] ] ] "afiliaciones" => array:3 [ 0 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Anesthesia and Critical Care Department, Hospital Universitario Juan Ramón Jiménez, Huelva, Spain" "etiqueta" => "a" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] 1 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Anesthesia and Critical Care Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain" "etiqueta" => "b" "identificador" => "aff0010" ] 2 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain" "etiqueta" => "c" "identificador" => "aff0015" ] ] "correspondencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "cor0005" "etiqueta" => "⁎" "correspondencia" => "Corresponding author." ] ] ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Efecto de la primera ola de la pandemia COVID-19 en la aplicación de los protocolos de recuperación intensificada perioperatoria según la percepción de los profesionales sanitarios" ] ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:8 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Figure 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 1508 "Ancho" => 2091 "Tamanyo" => 96651 ] ] "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at0005" "detalle" => "Figure " "rol" => "short" ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0005" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Respondents' perception of adherence to ERAS protocols before and after the pandemic (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Minimum: 1, Maximum: 10</span>).</p>" ] ] ] "textoCompleto" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSections"><p id="par0005" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programmes have been shown to reduce postoperative complications, use of critical care units, and length of hospital stay without increasing readmission rates, and are also cost-effective<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0005"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1</span></a>. The number of declared ERAS centres in Spain has grown exponentially in recent years, but much work remains to be done. However, the spread of the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in the spring of 2020 created major challenges for healthcare systems. Non-urgent and non-cancer-related procedures, and even cancer-related procedures in some heavily affected hospitals, were cancelled worldwide to make way for COVID-19 patients, many of which were admitted to intensive care units, generating the so-called Post COVID-19 Surgical Backlog<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0010"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a>. Some ERAS preoperative interventions, such as anaemia correction or prehabilitation, might also have been curtailed due to lockdown travel rules and the restrictions imposed on hospital admissions for therapy.</p><p id="par0010" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Hospitals where ERAS is routine practice have had difficulties maintaining these programmes due to the high number of COVID-19 patients, and those that did not routinely apply ERAS before the pandemic have found it difficult to start introducing the protocols.</p><p id="par0015" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The objective of this study was to evaluate current ERAS practice in major surgery by means of a questionnaire sent to anaesthesiologists and surgeons after the first wave of the COVID19 pandemic in Spain.</p><p id="par0020" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The Spanish Perioperative Audit and Research Network (REDGERM), the Spanish Society of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care (SEDAR) and the Spanish Association of Surgeons (AEC) endorsed the survey after it had been approved by their respective scientific and research committees.</p><p id="par0025" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The target population of this study were members of REDGERM. The estimated size of the target population for our survey was about 1000 researchers. Using a study sample size calculator (total population 1000, 95% confidence interval), we calculated that a total sample size of 278 participants would be needed to obtain useful information.</p><p id="par0030" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">We contacted REDGERM researchers from more than 125 Spanish centres inviting them to voluntarily complete an open questionnaire on the Internet. The invitation included a link to the survey. The survey was not made public, so access to the questionnaire by uninvited people was unlikely. Participant responses were collected using Google forms. The survey was active for 1 month. Respondents implicitly gave their informed consent by opening, completing, and returning the online questionnaire. The questionnaire was a structured, web-based form with single and multiple response questions. All questions were mandatory. To prevent investigators completing multiple questionnaires, they were asked to provide their name and email, and duplicate entries in the database were eliminated before performing the analysis.</p><p id="par0035" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">A 44-item questionnaire was developed to determine the changes in the perioperative management of patients caused by the COVID pandemic. Participants were asked to answer the questions based on their personal clinical practice at the time the survey was launched — 15 June 2020 — and not on the changes introduced mid-way during the first wave of the pandemic. The questions were structured in blocks: in the first, the respondent's demographic characteristics were obtained; in the second, the change in each of the perioperative items was characterized based on the recommendations of the ERAS Society; and in the third, participants were asked to rate their adherence (from 0 [minimum] to 10 [maximum]) to a series of ERAS items. The face validity and content of the questionnaire were established and tested during the development phase by a panel of experts from REDGERM (JVL, JRM, AAM), SEDAR (CA) and AEC. Data were expressed as frequency (proportion) and median (IQR) and analysed according to the number of responses obtained for each item. Median adherence to each perioperative item was compared using Friedman’s test. To avoid incongruent answers, we eliminated comparisons made by respondents who had previously stated that a particular ERAS item was not implemented. We also eliminated answers where respondents had already stated that the pandemic did not change a particular item, but in the next question (which assessed the extent of adherence to that item), the respondent answered that the change in adherence before and after the pandemic was greater than half.</p><p id="par0040" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The questionnaire was completed by 30.3% of physicians contacted. We received a total of 320 completed questionnaires. Two hundred and fifteen questionnaire were completed by anaesthesiologists (67.2%), 99 by surgeons (30.9%) and 6 by other specialists (1.87%); 212 physicians (66.3%) worked in hospitals with up to 600 beds. More than half of the participants (58.8%) had been routinely tested for Coronavirus. Almost all respondents reported that in their centres, patients were screened for SARS-CoV-2 infection preoperatively (98.4%), with RT-PCR of nasopharyngeal swabs being the most common test (94.4%).</p><p id="par0045" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Of the total number of respondents, 37% stated that surgery for non-malignant diseases had been postponed in their centres, 18% stated that only oncologic surgeries were performed, and 2.82% that only emergency surgeries were performed in their hospital. Multidisciplinary meetings to decide on the surgical oncology programme were held frequently (38.4%) or had been reduced (23.8%). Respondents believed that in many cases the decisions have been influenced by the pandemic, prioritising neoadjuvant therapy over surgery (36.9%). Our survey has shown that post-operative care has been adapted to the pandemic, with shorter than usual stays in the Critical Care Unit (44.8%). In many cases, critical care beds were not available in the post-operative period, and patients were transferred directly to the ward (7.19%).</p><p id="par0050" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Respondents also stated that standard clinical pathways have been altered, with some patients being discharged home earlier than usual due to the workload and to avoid Coronavirus infection (31.6%)</p><p id="par0055" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Nearly all (83.4%) respondents stated that ERAS pathways were implemented in their centres. Despite this, before the pandemic, only 60% of respondents stated that ERAS patients attended a specific pre-operative visit in their hospitals, and in 44.1% of cases no regular specific multidisciplinary meetings were held to audit improvements and monitoring. A large number of respondents indicated that prehabilitation programmes had never been implemented in their centres (35.9%). In centres where prehabilitation was implemented (64.1%), there was a statistically significant decrease in the subjective perception of patients who underwent prehabilitation before versus after COVID (Friedman X<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> = 96.593, <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> < 0.05). Two-hundred and fifty-seven respondents (80.3%) performed preoperative nutritional assessment before the pandemic. There were significant differences among participants who believed that patient screening had changed before and after the COVID pandemic (Friedman X<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> = 61.357, <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> < 0.05).</p><p id="par0060" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Treatment of anaemia had not changed in the hospitals of 65.3% of respondents, but respondents observed differences in the number of patients who underwent preoperative assessment and treatment of anaemia. The administration of carbohydrate drinks 2 h before surgery had been slightly reduced due to the pandemic. Adherence to this measure remains very low (55.6%). Most surgical approaches were laparoscopic (88.4%), and epidural analgesia was usually used in open surgery (88.1%). Respondents observed that the use of multimodal analgesia (95.6%), thromboprophylaxis according to guidelines (97.2%), management of postoperative fluids, early oral intake (92.2%), treatment of postoperative malnutrition (85.3%), and early mobilization (89.7%) have varied less than 5% following the outbreak of SARS CoV-2.</p><p id="par0065" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Hospital adherence to ERAS protocols, according to respondents, was lower than before the pandemic (Friedman X2 = 56,828, <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> < 0.05) <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0005">Fig. 1</a>.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0005"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0070" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">These results, which reflect the personal opinion of respondents, show a decline in adherence to ERAS items, particularly those involving preoperative optimization, including preoperative management of anaemia.</p><p id="par0075" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The latest estimates suggest that more than 28 million surgeries were cancelled or postponed during the first wave of the pandemic<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0010"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a>. In addition, many specialists involved in ERAS pathways have had to be relocated within their hospital to care for COVID-19 patients. Changes in these multidisciplinary teams may result in decreased adherence to ERAS items, and this has been associated with changes in postoperative outcomes<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0015"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">3</span></a>. Moreover, as our survey shows, adherence to ERAS protocols was already poor before the pandemic.</p><p id="par0080" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Our study has limitations: first, the questionnaire collected the respondent’s opinion, not objective data; second, being members of the REDGERM group, the respondents were already interested in ERAS programmes; third, we do not know whether some responders worked in the same centre as others. Furthermore, the dynamic of the questionnaire itself may result in responses that are not sufficiently rigorous, especially the ordinal assessment questions.</p><p id="par0085" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">This survey shows that the quality of perioperative management in patients who underwent surgery just after the first wave of the COVID pandemic declined significantly, particularly in terms of adherence to ERAS items.</p><p id="par0090" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Given the high number of cancelled and postponed surgeries, hospital staff should give priority to optimising healthcare resources. The application of ERAS protocols can be an important tool in the management of the Post COVID-19 Surgical Backlog<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0020"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">4</span></a>.</p><span id="sec0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0005">Funding</span><p id="par0095" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.</p></span><span id="sec0010" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0010">Declaration of interest</span><p id="par0100" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The authors have no conflict of interest to declare</p></span></span>" "textoCompletoSecciones" => array:1 [ "secciones" => array:3 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0005" "titulo" => "Funding" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0010" "titulo" => "Declaration of interest" ] 2 => array:1 [ "titulo" => "References" ] ] ] "pdfFichero" => "main.pdf" "tienePdf" => true "fechaRecibido" => "2021-04-14" "NotaPie" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "☆" "nota" => "<p class="elsevierStyleNotepara" id="npar0005">Please cite this article as: Lorente JV, Ripollés-Melchor J, Aldecoa C, Abad-Motos A. Efecto de la primera ola de la pandemia COVID-19 en la aplicación de los protocolos de recuperación intensificada perioperatoria según la percepción de los profesionales sanitarios. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2022;69:374–376.</p>" ] ] "multimedia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Figure 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 1508 "Ancho" => 2091 "Tamanyo" => 96651 ] ] "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at0005" "detalle" => "Figure " "rol" => "short" ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0005" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Respondents' perception of adherence to ERAS protocols before and after the pandemic (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Minimum: 1, Maximum: 10</span>).</p>" ] ] ] "bibliografia" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "References" "seccion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "bibs0005" "bibliografiaReferencia" => array:4 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0005" "etiqueta" => "1" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "The impact of enhanced recovery protocol compliance on elective colorectal cancer resection: Results from an international registry" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "A. Currie" 1 => "J. Burch" 2 => "J.T. Jenkins" 3 => "O. Faiz" 4 => "R.H. Kennedy" 5 => "O. Ljungqvist" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1097/SLA.0000000000001029" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Ann Surg" "fecha" => "2015" "volumen" => "261" "paginaInicial" => "1153" "paginaFinal" => "1159" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25671587" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 1 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0010" "etiqueta" => "2" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "The post COVID-19 surgical backlog: Now is the time to implement Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS)" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "O. Ljungqvist" 1 => "G. Nelson" 2 => "N. Demartines" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1007/s00268-020-05734-5" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "World J Surg" "fecha" => "2020" "volumen" => "44" "paginaInicial" => "3197" "paginaFinal" => "3198" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32803298" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 2 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0015" "etiqueta" => "3" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "We asked the experts: how do we maintain surgical quality standards for enhanced recovery programs after cancer surgery during the COVID-19 outbreak?" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "A. Doussot" 1 => "B. Heyd" 2 => "Z. Lakkis" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1007/s00268-020-05546-7" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "World J Surg" "fecha" => "2020" "volumen" => "44" "paginaInicial" => "2051" "paginaFinal" => "2052" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32335691" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 3 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0020" "etiqueta" => "4" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Prospects of ERAS (enhanced recovery after surgery) protocols in post pandemic era" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "A.S.D. Liyanage" 1 => "C. Weerasinghe" 2 => "K. Gokul" 3 => "B.H. Babu" 4 => "P. Ainsworth" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1002/bjs.11903" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Br J Surg" "fecha" => "2020" "volumen" => "107" "paginaInicial" => "e443" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32757269" "web" => "Medline" ] ] "itemHostRev" => array:3 [ "pii" => "S1535610821003950" "estado" => "S300" "issn" => "15356108" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "url" => "/23411929/0000006900000006/v1_202207050820/S2341192922000944/v1_202207050820/en/main.assets" "Apartado" => array:4 [ "identificador" => "66474" "tipo" => "SECCION" "en" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Letter to the Director" "idiomaDefecto" => true ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" ] "PDF" => "https://static.elsevier.es/multimedia/23411929/0000006900000006/v1_202207050820/S2341192922000944/v1_202207050820/en/main.pdf?idApp=UINPBA00004N&text.app=https://www.elsevier.es/" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2341192922000944?idApp=UINPBA00004N" ]
Year/Month | Html | Total | |
---|---|---|---|
2024 September | 2 | 0 | 2 |
2024 August | 3 | 0 | 3 |
2024 July | 4 | 0 | 4 |
2024 June | 3 | 0 | 3 |
2024 March | 1 | 0 | 1 |
2024 February | 2 | 0 | 2 |
2023 December | 1 | 0 | 1 |