covid
Buscar en
Allergologia et Immunopathologia
Toda la web
Inicio Allergologia et Immunopathologia Prevalence of self-reported food allergy in Cartagena (Colombia) population
Información de la revista
Vol. 36. Núm. 6.
Páginas 320-324 (diciembre 2008)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Visitas
4928
Vol. 36. Núm. 6.
Páginas 320-324 (diciembre 2008)
Acceso a texto completo
Prevalence of self-reported food allergy in Cartagena (Colombia) population
Visitas
4928
J. Marrugo, L. Hernández, V Villalba
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Tablas (6)
Table I. The prevalence of self-reported food allergy (FA) in Cartagena population
Table II. Atopic diseases in subjects with self-reported food allergy (FA) vs. without self-reported food allergy
Table III. Most frequent symptoms in subjects with self-reported food allergy (FA) (n = 461)
Table IV. Most frequent foods reported as responsible for allergy symptoms (N = 461)
Table V. Relative frequency of seven food allergens according to age range
Table VI. The prevalence of self-reported plant food allergy in Cartagena population (3099)
Mostrar másMostrar menos
Texto completo
INTRODUCTION

Food allergy (FA) is a frequent and common health problem; however, there are few population-based studies. Prevalence studies based on self-reported symptoms associated to FA are generally imprecise, ranging from 1.4 % to 33 %1–5. The prevalence of FA in the population depends on factors such as eating habits, cultural influences as well as the genetic background and methodologies applied6–10. However, few studies have been conducted at the population level. Most researchers suggest that the public's belief in FA is much higher than prevalence data support. However, FA self-perception questionnairebased studies conducted on a diverse population serve as groundwork for further objective studies11–16.

In the last few years several studies have suggested that the prevalence of FA is increasing17–19. A recent meta-analysis enclosing more than fifty studies, showed great heterogeneity in reported FA prevalence among different populations, and concluded that this could be a result of both differences in study design or methodology and populations20. The same study recommends that measurements be made using standardised methods, if possible food challenge. Europreval, a European Union funded integrated project, is the first initiative towards delivering information and tools necessary to undertake such a problem. In order to obtain reliable FA prevalence estimates, standard protocols and questionnaires are used21,22. To date there are few studies in developing countries showing the real dimension of FA as a public health issue23,24. The present study was carried out on 3099 subjects using a questionnaire. Our objectives were: a) to establish the prevalence of self-perception of FA; b) which were the most important foods implicated; c) the frequency of the most referred symptoms; d) the prevalence in each age range; and e) the most frequent food implicated according with age range.

METHODSPopulation

This is a cross-sectional study. A total of 3099 individuals in a randomised selection, aged 1-83years, and living in neighbourhoods in Cartagena were questioned about personal and family history of allergies and food allergy. Ethnically, Cartagena population is defined as a mixture between Caucasoids (Spaniards) and Negroids (Africans) that are named mulattos25. The subjects answered a questionnaire applied door-to-door by trained medical students. The sample was calculated according to Cartagena population size, and a proportional scale was used in each neighbourhood related to the number of houses. A pilot test with 50 individuals was carried out in order to validate the questionnaire.

Questionnaire

The subjects were asked a questionnaire with ten questions in the following order: 1) personal data and occupation; 2) sex and age; 2) personal history of atopic diseases, rhinitis, asthma and eczema; 3) evaluation by allergist; 4) if yes, the result of the test; (5) the use of latex gloves; (6) if yes, tolerance to gloves. The following questions were designed to detect an allergic reaction after food or drink intake. In the case of positive reply, questions 9 and 10 were designed to establish the characteristics of reactions, and which, and how many foods, are implicated by the subjects.

Self-reported symptoms classification

We classified the reported symptoms according to affected organs after food intake: 1) skin reactions if individuals reported symptoms, such as rash, itching, and redness; 2) gastrointestinal symptoms if the adverse reactions were vomits or nauseas, diarrhoea, and stomach pain; 3) respiratory symptoms, if these were throat tightness, wheezing, coughing, shortness of breath, and nasal congestion; 4) and other symptoms such as headache, itch and swelling of lips or mouth, swelling of face, and anaphylactic shock.

Statistical analysis

The data obtained were stored in SPSS software version 13. Statistical analysis was performed using descriptive statistics and we carried out a Chi square test to compare groups according to personal history for atopy and FA. A t-student test was done to establish OR with a confidence intervals of 95 %. If p < 0.05 it was considered significant.

RESULTS

A total of 3099 individuals participated in the survey. Report of food allergy (FA) was 14.9 % (n = 461). The prevalence of self-reported FA was higher in females (16.4 %) than in males (12.8 %) (p < 0.05). According to the age range, self-reported prevalence in patients from 1–8years, was 10.1 %; from 9–16years, 12.6 %; from 17–24years, 17.5 %; from 25–32years, 15.8 %; from 33–40years, 17.4 %; from 41–48years, 15.6 %; from 49–56years, 15.4 %; from 57–64years, 14.1 %; from 65–72years, 10.3 %; from 73–80years, 11.9 %; and more than 81years, 10.5 % (Table I).

Table I.

The prevalence of self-reported food allergy (FA) in Cartagena population

Population  Total sample (N)  Self-reported FA (N [%]) 
All  3099  461 (14.9) 
Sex     
Female  1717  282 (16.4)* 
Male  1382  178 (12.8)* 
Age (years)     
1-8  334  34 (10.1) 
9-16  450  57 (12.6) 
17-24  657  115 (17.5) 
25-32  335  53 (15.8) 
33-40  345  60 (17.4) 
41-48  352  55 (15.6) 
49-56  310  48 (15.4) 
57-64  149  21 (14.1) 
65-72  106  11 (10.3) 
73-80  42  5 (11.9) 
> 81  19  2 (10.5) 

OR 1.33, CI 95 % (1.08-1.64), p < 0.05

Atopic diseases were more frequent in subjects with self-reported FA than in the non self-reported FA (62.9 % vs. 29.6 %, OR 3.97, CI 95 %, 3.21-4.91, p < 0.0001). Asthma was present in 15.4 %, rhinitis in 39.3 %, and dermatitis in 13.2 % of patients with self-reported FA (Table II).

Table II.

Atopic diseases in subjects with self-reported food allergy (FA) vs. without self-reported food allergy

Subjects  Asthma (%)  Rhinitis (%)  Dermatitis (%)  Atopic disease (%) 
With self-reported FA  461  15.4*  39.3*  18.9*  62.9* 
Sex
Female  283  14.8  44.5  21.6  68.2 
Male  178  16.3  30.9  14.6  54.5 
Without self-reported FA  2638  7.1  20.1  6.0  29.6 
Sex
Female  1434  7.0  21.4  7.0  31.6 
Male  1204  7.1  18.4  7.1  27.3 
*

χ2 test, p < 0.0001

The most frequent symptoms reported were skin reactions (61.4 %), gastrointestinal (29.1 %), and respiratory symptoms (8.6 %) (Table III). Fruit and vegetables were the most implicated foods (41.86 %) followed by seafood with 26.8 % and meats with 20.86 % (Table IV). The relative frequency of responsible foods by age showed that fruit and vegetables were the most reported food allergen in almost all age ranges, except in the age range of 9-16years (Table V). The prevalence of self-reported reactions to fruits and vegetables according to age shows that they are important contributors to the overall prevalence in all age ranges (Table VI).

Table III.

Most frequent symptoms in subjects with self-reported food allergy (FA) (n = 461)

Reported symptoms 
Skin reactions (Rash, itching, redness)  283  61.4 
Gastrointestinal symptoms (Vomiting or nausea, diarrhoea, stomach pain)  134  29.1 
Respiratory symptoms (Throat tightness, wheezing, coughing, shortness of breath, nasal congestion)  24  8.6 
Headache (Migraine)  40  8.6 
Itchy and swelling of lips, or mouth  22  4.7 
Swelling of face  1.7 
Anaphylactic shock  0.2 
Others  1.1 
Table IV.

Most frequent foods reported as responsible for allergy symptoms (N = 461)

Food 
Fruit/vegetables  193  41.86 
Seafood  123  26.68 
Meats  96  20.86 
Liquors  60  13.01 
Milk  44  9.54 
Eggs  14  3.03 
Preservatives/additives  13  2.81 
Table V.

Relative frequency of seven food allergens according to age range

Age range (years)Relative frequency of foods (%)
Vegetables/Fruit  Seafood  Milk  Meats  Egg  Liquors 
1 to 8  44.1  2.9  2.5  26.4  2.9 
9 to 16  26  28  11.1  22.7  5.2 
17 to 24  45.1  27.7  0.8  19.9  1.7  15.6 
25 to 32  33.9  28.2  5.6  20.6  3.7  18.8 
33 to 40  38.9  23.3  10  11.6  3.3  16.6 
41 to 48  39.4  34.5  3.6  16.2  1.8  16.3 
49 to 56  66.6  25  16.6  18.7  10.4 
57 to 64  72  33.3  4.7  14.2  4.7  4.7 
65 to 72  42.8  45.4  18.1  9.1  27.2 
73 to 80  42.8  42.8  14.2  28.2  14.2 
Table VI.

The prevalence of self-reported plant food allergy in Cartagena population (3099)

Age (years)  N/total  Self-reported prevalence in % 
1-8  19/334  5.6 
9-16  18/450  4.0 
17-24  50/657  7.6 
25-32  22/335  6.5 
33-40  23/345  6.6 
41-48  22/342  6.2 
49-56  18/310  5.8 
57-64  13/149  8.7 
65-72  8/106  7.5 
73->80  4/61  6.5 
DISCUSSION

The majority of studies related to FA have been carried out in European countries; to our knowledge, this is the first publication of a population-based study on FA in a Latin American country. In Colombia we do not have any epidemiological data related to this issue. This study is the first step in the knowledge about food allergy in order to identify if this condition is a public health problem in developing countries. The self-reported prevalence of FA was 14.9 %, which was higher in females than in males (16.4 % vs. 12.8 %). These results agree with other reports that used similar methodologies3,23. We believe that our prevalence is overestimated due to difficulties in conducting population-based studies with an objective assessment of FA. However, in a recent meta-analysis, where the authors reviewed fifty-one studies, they observed a high heterogeneity in the prevalence reports, even in studies of different countries following the same methodology26. Previous studies have shown less than 50 % of self-reported reactions being confirmed when controlled challenges are used5,11. The highest prevalence (17.5 %) was found between individuals with ages ranging from 17 to 24years, an interesting finding considering that the majority of studies report the highest prevalence among children4,27. The overall prevalence was higher among adults (> 16years) than children, possibly due to seldom reported child FA related symptoms by the parents as opposed to frequent adult reporting of their own symptoms. Questionnaire-based prevalence studies could overestimate data, but these are important tools for information about problems. Confirmation of these results will come only from further studies that include objective diagnostic tests.

FA prevalence was found to be more frequent among atopic individuals than in non-atopics (62.9 % vs. 29.6 %, p < 0.0001), as previously described by other studies. This result suggests that the atopic condition could be a risk factor to develop FA. Skin reactions were the most frequent symptoms related by the subjects (61.4 %), as reported in other populations1,2,28. A low frequency of anaphylactic shock related to FA was found in our study, in accordance with previous reports, probably due to the scarce reactions to nuts in our population1,20.

The most frequently implicated foods were fruit/vegetables with 41.86 % followed by seafood and meats with 26.8 % and 20.8 % respectively. In contradiction with other studies we found that fruit/vegetables were the most frequently related foods among the child population4,20, this profile could be due to the eating habits of our population. However, this study was questionnaire-based and reactions could be intoxications and other gastrointestinal conditions, hence these results should be confirmed by objective tests. It is very important to point out that this is the first population based study conducted in Latin America, and one of the first in a developing country. For this reason we conclude that this is the first step towards recognising FA as a public health issue in our population.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the University of Cartagena, Colombia. Special thanks to Dr. Luis Caraballo for his critical reading of the manuscript, and the University of Cartagena's medical school students for their assistance in the interviews.

REFERENCES
[1.]
G. Kanny, D.A. Moneret-Vautrin, J. Flabbee, E. Beaudouin, M. Morisset, F. Thevenin.
Population study of food allergy in France.
J Allergy Clin Immunol., 108 (2001), pp. 133-140
[2.]
T. Schafer, E. Bohler, S. Ruhdorfer, L. Weigl, D. Wessner, J. Heinrich, et al.
Epidemiology of food allergy/food intolerance in adults: associations with other manifestations of atopy.
Allergy., 56 (2001), pp. 1172-1179
[3.]
D. Altman, L.T. Chiaramonte.
Public perception of food allergy.
J Allergy Clin Immunol., 97 (1996), pp. 1247-1251
[4.]
F. Rance, X. Grandmottet, H. Grandjean.
Prevalence and main characteristics of schoolchildren diagnosed with food allergies in France.
Clin Exp Allergy., 35 (2005), pp. 167-172
[5.]
R.K. Woods, R.M. Stoney, J. Raven, E.H. Walters, M. Abramson, F.C. Thien.
Reported adverse food reactions overestimate true food allergy in the community.
Eur J Clin Nutr., 56 (2002), pp. 31-36
[6.]
Pei-Chi Shek L, Wah Lee, B Food allergy in Asia. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;6:197-201Roberto J. Rona.
[7.]
Sicherer SH. Clinical update on peanut allergy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2002;88:350–61; quiz 61–2, 94.
[8.]
S.H. Sicherer, T.J. Furlong, H.H. Maes, R.J. Desnick, H.A. Sampson, B.D. Gelb.
Genetics of peanut allergy: a twin study.
J Allergy Clin Immunol., 106 (2000), pp. 53-56
[9.]
B.L. Cohen, S. Noone, A. Munoz-Furlong, S.H. Sicherer.
Development of a questionnaire to measure quality of life in families with a child with food allergy.
J Allergy Clin Immunol., 114 (2004), pp. 1159-1163
[10.]
M.M. Amoli, S. Hand, A.H. Hajeer, K.P. Jones, S. Rolf, C. Sting, et al.
Polymorphism in the STAT6 gene encodes risk for nut allergy.
Genes Immun., 3 (2002), pp. 220-224
[11.]
T. Zuberbier, G. Edenharter, M. Worm, I. Ehlers, S. Reimann, T. Hantke, et al.
Prevalence of adverse reactions to food in Germany a population study.
[12.]
R.K. Woods, F. Thien, J. Raven, E.H. Walters, M. Abramson.
Prevalence of food allergies in young adults and their relationship to asthma, nasal allergies, and eczema.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol., 88 (2002), pp. 183-189
[13.]
C.C. Roehr, G. Edenharter, S. Reimann, I. Ehlers, M. Worm, T. Zuberbier, et al.
Food allergy and non-allergic food hypersensitivity in children and adolescents.
Clin Exp Allergy., 34 (2004), pp. 1534-1541
[14.]
B. Pereira, C. Venter, J. Grundy, C.B. Clayton, S.H. Arshad, T. Dean.
Prevalence of sensitization to food allergens, reported adverse reaction to foods, food avoidance, and food hypersensitivity among teenagers.
J Allergy Clin Immunol., 116 (2005), pp. 884-892
[15.]
I. Dalal, I. Binson, R. Reifen, Z. Amitai, T. Shohat, S. Rahmani, et al.
Food allergy is a matter of geography after all: sesame as a major cause of severe IgE-mediated food allergic reactions among infants and young children in Israel.
Allergy., 57 (2002), pp. 362-365
[16.]
C. Venter, B. Pereira, J. Grundy, C.B. Clayton, S.H. Arshad, T. Dean.
Prevalence of sensitization reported and objectively assessed food hypersensitivity amongst six-year-old children: a population-based study.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol., 17 (2006), pp. 356-363
[17.]
R. Gupta, A. Sheikh, D.P. Strachan, H.R. Anderson.
Burden of allergic disease in the UK: secondary analyses of national databases.
Clin Exp Allergy., 34 (2004), pp. 520-526
[18.]
R. Gupta, A. Sheikh, D.P. Strachan, H.R. Anderson.
Time trends in allergic disorders in the UK.
Thorax., 62 (2007), pp. 91-96
[19.]
J. Grundy, S. Matthews, B. Bateman, T. Dean, S.H. Arshad.
Rising prevalence of allergy to peanut in children: Data from 2 sequential cohorts.
J Allergy Clin Immunol., 110 (2002), pp. 784-789
[20.]
R.J. Rona, T. Keil, C. Summers, D. Gislason, L. Zuidmeer.
Sodergren E, et al.
A meta-analysis. J Allergy Clin Immunol, (2007),
[21.]
E.N. Mills, A.R. Mackie, P. Burney, K. Beyer, L. Frewer, C. Madsen, et al.
The prevalence, cost and basis of food allergy across Europe.
[22.]
de Blok BM, Vlieg-Boerstra BJ, Oude Elberink JN, Duiverman EJ, Dunngalvin A, Hourihane JO, et al. A framework for measuring the social impact of food allergy across Europe: a EuroPrevall state of the art paper. Allergy. 2007;62:733–7.
[23.]
N. Lunet, H. Falcao, M. Sousa, N. Bay, H. Barros.
Self-reported food and drug allergy in Maputo, Mozambique.
Public Health., 119 (2005), pp. 587-589
[24.]
R.K. Chandra.
Food hypersensitivity and allergic disease: a new threat in India.
Indian Pediatr., 40 (2003), pp. 99-101
[25.]
L.R. Caraballo, J. Marrugo, H. Erlich, M. Pastorizo.
HLAalleles in the population of Cartagena (Colombia).
Tissue Antigens., 39 (1992), pp. 128-133
[26.]
Zuidmeer LG, K.Rona, R. J. Gislason, D. Madsen, C. Summers, C. Sodergren, E. Dahlstrom, J. Lindner, T. Sigurdardottir, S. T.McBride, D. and Keil, T. The prevalence of plan food allergies: A systematic review. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008; 121:1210–8.
[27.]
T. Keil.
Epidemiology of food allergy: what's new? A critical appraisal of recent population-based studies.
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol., 7 (2007), pp. 259-263
[28.]
Woods RK, Abramson M, Bailey M, Walters EH. International prevalences of reported food allergies and intolerances. Comparisons arising from the European Community Respiratory Health Survey (ECRHS) 1991–1994. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2001;55: 298–304.
Copyright © 2008. Sociedad Española de Inmunología Clínica y Alergología Pediátrica y Elsevier España, S.L.
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos