covid
Buscar en
Angiología
Toda la web
Inicio Angiología By-pass distales a arterias perimaleolares en la isquemia crítica de las extrem...
Información de la revista
Vol. 56. Núm. 4.
Páginas 355-365 (enero 2004)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 56. Núm. 4.
Páginas 355-365 (enero 2004)
Acceso a texto completo
By-pass distales a arterias perimaleolares en la isquemia crítica de las extremidades inferiores
Bypasses that are distal to the perimalleolar arteries in critical ischemia of the lower limbs
By-pass distais as arterias perimaleolares na isquemia crítica das extremidades inferiores
Visitas
2315
J.M. Zaragozá-García*, A. Plaza-Martínez, J.I. Blanes-Mompó, J.L. Briones-Estebánez, F.J. Gómez-Palonés, I. Martínez-Perelló, I. Crespo-Moreno, E. Ortiz-Monzón
Servicio de Angiologia, Cirugía Vascular y Endovascular. Hospital Universitario Dr. Peset. Valencia España.
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Resumen
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Resumen

Objetivos. Analizar los resultados obtenidos a corto y largo plazo de las derivaciones distales en la región perimaleolar en la isquemia critica de las extremidades y estudiar qué factores influyen en la permeabilidad de éstas.

Pacientes y métodos

Desde noviembre de 1993 hasta mayo de 2002 se practicaron 125 by-pass distales en 114 pacientes con isquemia crítica (76 hombres y 38 mujeres) con una edad media de 71 años (intervalo: 47-93). El 74,4% presentaba lesión isquémica en el momento de la cirugía. La arteria femoral superficial fue la localización más frecuente de anastomosis proximal, y la pedia como distal. El injerto que más se utilizó fue la vena safena interna. Análisis estadístico: comparativo de permeabilidad (Kaplan-Meier y test de log-rank) y univariante (chi al cuadrado, t de Student) de los factores que pudieran influir en ella.

Resultados

El seguimiento medio fue de 36 meses (intervalo: 198 meses). La permeabilidad operatoria fue del 82%. La permeabilidad primaria a los 36 meses fue del 62% y la secundaria del 63%. La tasa de salvamento de la extremidad a los 12 y 36 meses fue del 68% y 63%. La permeabilidad a largo plazo fue mayor en pacientes diabéticos que en no diabéticos (p <0,05).

Conclusiones

El by-pass distal ha demostrado ser una buena técnica de salvamento de la extremidad. La permeabilidad primaria de las derivaciones es mayor en los pacientes diabéticos que en los no diabéticos.

Palabras clave:
Isquemia crítica
Revascularización femorodistal perimaleolar
Tratamiento quirúrgico
Salvamento de extremidad
Summary
Aims

The objective of this study was to analyse the short and long-term results offered by distal bypasses in the perimalleolar region in cases of critical ischemia of the limbs and to examine the factors that affect their patency.

Patients and methods

Between November 1993 and May 2002 125 distal bypasses were carried out on 114 patients with critical ischemia (76 males and 38 females) with a mean age of 71 years (interval: 47-93). Of these, 74.4% presented ischemic lesions at the time of the surgical intervention. The superficial femoral artery was the most frequent location of proximal anastomosis, and the dorsalis pedis was the most common in the case of distal anastomosis. The graft that was most often used was the internal saphenous vein. Statistical analysis: a comparison of patency (Kaplan-Meier and log-rank test) and univariate analysis (chi-squared, Student's t) of the factors that may influence it.

Results

Mean follow-up was 36 months (interval: 1-98 months). Operative patency was 82%. Primary patency at 36 months was 62% and secondary was 63%. Limb salvage rate at 12 and 36 months was 68% and 63% respectively. Long-term patency was higher in diabetic patients than in non-diabetics (p<0.05).

Conclusions

Distal bypass has proved to be a good limb salvage technique. Primary patency of the grafts is higher in diabetics than in non-diabetics.

Key words:
Critical ischemia
Limb salvage
Perimalleolar femorodistal revascularisation
Surgical treatment
Resumo

Objectivos. Analisar os resultados obtidos a curto e longo prazo das derivações distais na região perimaleolar na isquemia crítica das extremidades e estudar que factores influem na permeabilidade destas.

Doentes e métodos

Desde Novembro de 1993 até Maio de 2002 foram executados 125 by-pass distais em 114 doentes com isquemia crítica (76 homens e 38 mulheres) com uma idade media de 71 anos (intervalo: 47-93). 74,4% apresentavam lesão isquémica no momento da cirurgia. A artéria femoral superficial foi a localização mais frequente de anastomose proximal, e a pedial como distal. O enxerto que mais se utilizou foi a veia safena interna. Análise estatística: comparativo de permeabilidade (Kaplan-Meier e teste de log-rank) e univariante (chi ao quadrado, t de Student) dos factores que puderam influenciá-la.

Resultados

O seguimento médio foi de 36 meses (intervalo: 1-98 meses). A permeabilidade operatória foi de 82%. A permeabilidade primária aos 36 meses foi de 62% e a secundária de 63%. A taxa de salvamento da extremidade aos 12 e 36 meses foi de 68% e 63%. A permeabilidade a longo prazo foi maior em doentes diabéticos que em não diabéticos (p <0,05).

Conclusões

O by-pass distal demonstrou ser uma boa técnica de salvamento da extremidade. A permeabilidade primária das derivações é maior nos doentes diabéticos que nos não diabéticos.

Palavras chave:
Isquemia crítica
Revascularização femorodistal perimaleolar
Tratamento cirúrgico
Salvamento de extremidade
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC).
Management of peripheral arterial disease.
J Vasc Surg, 31 (2000),
[2.]
Rutherford R.B., Baker J.D., Ernst C., Jhonston K.W., Porter J.N., Ahn S..
Recommended standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia: revised version.
J Vasc Surg, 26 (1997), pp. 517-538
[3.]
Ascer E., Veith F.J., Flores S.A.W..
Infrapopliteal bypass to heavily calcified rock-like arteries.
Am J Surg, 152 (1986), pp. 220-223
[4.]
Ascer E., Veith F.J., Gupta S.K..
Bypasses to plantar arteries and other tibial branches: an extended approach to limb salvage.
J Vasc Surg, 8 (1988), pp. 434-441
[5.]
Corson J.D., Karmody A.M., Shah D.M., Young H.L., Leather R.P..
In situ vein bypasses to distal tibial, and limited outflow tracts for limb salvage.
Surgery, 96 (1984), pp. 756-780
[6.]
Ascer E., Veith F.J., Gupta S.K..
Tibiotibial vein bypass grafts: a new operation for limb salvage.
J Vasc Surg, 2 (1985), pp. 552-557
[7.]
Andros G., Harris R.W., Salles-Cunha S.X., Dulawa L.B., Oblath R.W., Apyan R.L..
Bypass grafts to the ankle and foot.
J Vasc Surg, 7 (1988), pp. 785-794
[8.]
Buchbinder D., Pasch A.R., Verta M.J..
Ankle bypass: should we go the distance?.
Am J Surg, 150 (1985), pp. 216-219
[9.]
Buchbinder D., Pasch A.R., Rollins D.L..
Results of arterial reconstruction to the foot.
Arch Surg, 121 (1986), pp. 673-677
[10.]
Hobson R.W., Lynch T.G., Jamil Z..
Results of revascularization and amputation in severe lower extremity ischemia: a five-year clinical experience.
J Vasc Surg, 2 (1985), pp. 174-185
[11.]
Hernández Osma E., Riera S., Maria-Simeón J., Romera A., Marti X., Cairols M.A..
Resultados de las derivaciones femordistales a tronco único en la cirugia para la salvación de una extremidad.
Angiologia, 3 (2000), pp. 111-116
[12.]
Davidson J.T., Callis J.T..
Arterial reconstruction of vessels in the foot and ankle.
Transactions of the Southern Surgical Association, CIV (1992), pp. 277-288
[13.]
Gutiérrez-Baz M., Rodriguez de la Calle J., Quintana-Gordon M., Cuenca-Manteca J., García-Martínez B., Veras-Troncoso M., et al.
By-pass femorodistal con vena safena autólogain situ: revisión a cinco años.
Angiología, 1 (1999), pp. 3-10
[14.]
Rutherford R.B., Jones D.N., Bergentz S.E..
Factors affecting the patency of infrainguinal bypass.
J Vasc Surg, 8 (1988), pp. 236
[15.]
Lambert G.E..
Management alternatives of infrainguinal arteriosclerosis obliterans in the elderly.
Surg Clin North Am, 66 (1986), pp. 293-303
[16.]
Nehler M.R., Peyton B.D..
Is revascularization and limb salvage always the treatment for critical limb ischemia?.
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino), 45 (2004), pp. 177-184
[17.]
Harris P.L., How T.V., Jones D.R..
Prospective randomized clinical trial to compare ‘in situ’ and reversed saphenous vein graft for femoropopliteal bypass.
Br J Surg, 74 (1987), pp. 252-267
[18.]
Wengerter K.R., Veith F.J., Gupta S.K., Ascer E., Rivers S.P..
Influence of vein size (diameter) of infrapopliteal reversed vein graft patency.
J Vasc Surg, 11 (1990), pp. 525-531
[19.]
Darling R.C., Shan D.M., Chang B.B..
Arterial reconstructions for limb salvage: is the terminal peroneal artery a disadvantaged outflow tract?.
Surgery, 118 (1995), pp. 763-767
[20.]
Raftery K.B., Belkin M., MacKey W., O'donell T.F..
Are peroneal artery bypass grafts hemodynamically inferior to other tibial artery bypass grafts?.
J Vasc Surg, 19 (1994), pp. 964-969
[21.]
Shah D.M., Leather R.P., Darling R.C., Chang B.B., Paty P.S.K., Lloyd W.B..
Long term results of using in situ saphenous vein bypass.
Adv Surg, 30 (1996), pp. 123-140
[22.]
Bergaminin T.M., George S.M., Massey H.T., Henke P.K., Klamer T.W., Lambert G.E..
Pedal or peroneal bypass: which is better when both are patent?.
J Vasc Surg, 20 (1994), pp. 347-356
[23.]
Donaldson M.C., Mannick J.A., Whittemore A.D..
Causes of primary graft failure after in situ saphenous vein: long-term results using the Mills valvulotome.
Ann Surg, 213 (1991), pp. 457
[24.]
Simms M.H., Garnham A.H..
Pontage au niveau des artéres de la cheville et du pied.
Ischémie critique des membres inférieurs, pp. 195-204
[25.]
Taylor L.M., Edwards J.M., Porter J.M..
Present status of reversed vein bypass grafting: five year results of a modern series.
J Vasc Surg, 11 (1990), pp. 193
[26.]
Bergan J.J., Veith F.J., Bernhard W..
Randomization of autogenus vein and polytetrafluo-roethylene grafts in femoral distal reconstruction.
Surgery, 92 (1982), pp. 921-930
[27.]
Hurley J.J., Auer A.I., Hershey F.B..
Distal arterial reconstruction: patency and limb salvage in diabetics.
J Vasc Surg, 5 (1987),
[28.]
Klamer T.W., Lambert G.E., Richardson J.D..
Utility of inframalleolar arterial bypass grafting.
J Vasc Surg, 11 (1990),
[29.]
Farah I., Penillon S., Sessa C., Bosson J.L., Marin M., Chichignoud B., et al.
Inframalleolar bypass in limb salvage. Late results.
Ann Chir, 125 (2000), pp. 450-456
[30.]
Tosenovsky P., Janousek L., Adamec M., Jirkovska, Klinika A..
Pedal bypass in the treatment of critical ischemia in the diabetic foot.
Vnitr Lek, 46 (2000), pp. 456-459
[31.]
Connors J.P., Walsh D.B., Nelson P.R., Powell R.J., Fillinger M.F., Zwolak R.M., et al.
Pedalbranch artery bypass: a viable limb salvage option.
J Vasc Surg, 32 (2000), pp. 1071-1079
[32.]
Panneton J.M., Gloviczki P., Bower T.C., Rhodes J.M., Canton L.G., Toomey B.J..
Pedal bypass for limb salvage: impact of diabetes on long-term outcome.
Ann Vasc Surg, 14 (2000), pp. 640-647
[33.]
Kalra M., Gloviczki P., Bower T.C., Panneton J.M., Harmsen W.S., Jenkins G.D., et al.
Limb salvage after successful pedal bypass grafting is associated with improved long-term survival.
J Vasc Surg, 33 (2001), pp. 6-16
[34.]
Dorweiler B., Neufang A., Schmiedt W., Oelert H..
Pedal arterial bypass for limb salvage in patients with diabetes mellitus.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 24 (2002), pp. 309-313
[35.]
Pomposelli F.B., Kansal N., Hamdan A.D., Belfield A., Sheahan M., Campbell D.R., et al.
A decade of experience with dorsalis pedis artery bypass: analysis of outcome in more than 1,000 cases.
J Vasc Surg, 37 (2003), pp. 307-315
Copyright © 2004. SEACV
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos