metricas
covid
Buscar en
Annals of Hepatology
Toda la web
Inicio Annals of Hepatology Sensitivity and Specificity of Biochemical Tests for Diagnosis of Intrahepatic C...
Información de la revista
Vol. 16. Núm. 4.
Páginas 569-573 (julio - agosto 2017)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Visitas
2036
Vol. 16. Núm. 4.
Páginas 569-573 (julio - agosto 2017)
Open Access
Sensitivity and Specificity of Biochemical Tests for Diagnosis of Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy
Visitas
2036
Kondrackiene Jurate
,
Autor para correspondencia
kondrackiene@gmail.com

Correspondence and reprint request:
, Zalinkevicius Rimantas**, Sumskiene Jolanta*, Gintautas Vladas***, Kupcinskas Limas****
* Department of Gastroenterology. Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
** Institute of Endocrinology. Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
*** Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
**** Institute for Digestive Research. Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
Este artículo ha recibido

Under a Creative Commons license
Información del artículo
Resumen
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Tablas (4)
Table 1. Clinical, biochemical characteristics of patients with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and healthy pregnant women.
Table 2. Area under the curve (AUC) of all significant biochemical parameters.
Table 3. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive value and likelihood-ratio of total and individual bile acids for the diagnosis of ICP.
Table 4. Validity of new cut- off levels of transaminases for diagnosis of ICP.
Mostrar másMostrar menos
Abstract
Background and aim

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is linked with increased risk of fetal complications. An accurate diagnostic test is needed to diagnose this disorder on time. We aimed to assess sensitivity and specificity of laboratory tests used for diagnosis of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and determine more reliable cut-off values of transaminases.

Material and methods

Sixty one symptomatic patients with ICP and 29 healthy pregnant women were included in the retrospective analysis.

Results

ICP patients had higher total bile acids (TBA) levels than healthy women (32 vs. 6; P < 0.0001) due to increase in cholic acid (CA) and chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA). CA/CDCA ratio was significantly higher in ICP patients compared to healthy pregnant women (1.13 vs. 0.68; P < 0.00002). TBA, CA, CDCA and CA/CDCA ratio demonstrate the following sensitivity (94%, 96%, 89%, 71.9%) and specificity (63%, 63%, 59%, 79.3%, respectively) for ICP diagnosis. Lowering cut-off values for ALT (31 U/ L) and AST (30 U/L) resulted only in minimal increase of sensitivity to 92.2% vs. 90.1% for ALT and to 92.2%, vs. 90.6% for AST.

Conclusion

The present study did not reveal any single specific and sensitive marker for reliable diagnosis of ICP. Establishment of lower cut-off values for transaminases activity might only minimally increase the accuracy of diagnosing ICP.

Keywords:
Intrahepatic cholestasis
Pregnancy
Diagnostics
Serum bile acids
Transaminases
Texto completo
Introduction

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is a liver disorder unique to pregnancy. Pruritus with abnormal serum liver tests is the classical presentation of this disease.

ICP predominantly occurs during the third trimester of pregnancy and disappears after delivery.1-3 The cause of ICP remains unknown. Current research on the pathogenesis of ICP focuses on genetic and hormonal factors.4,5 While maternal prognosis is benign, there is a clear association between ICP and higher frequency of fetal distress, preterm delivery, and sudden intrauterine fetal death.6-12 An accurate test is needed to make timely diagnosis of this high-risk disorder. Serum bile acid measurement is considered the most sensitive laboratory abnormality in ICP; however, the levels of bile acids can fluctuate depending on the fasting state or gestational age.7-15 In addition, the turnaround time for receiving the laboratory results may be 1 or 2 weeks, making it difficult to await the results when deciding on induction of labour to reduce potential fetal complications. Serum liver enzymes are an important component for diagnosis but they may be normal in up to one third of cases. The upper normal limit of transaminases normal range was recently challenged, because possible modulators are often ignored in determining normal range.16 Reference ranges for transaminases also require re-evaluation in pregnancy. No single reliable test can currently unequivocally distinguish all cases of ICP and other liver diseases or dermatoses of pregnancy. New diagnostic autotaxin test with high specificity and sensitivity was recently suggested; however, it may be hardly accessible in clinical practice.17,18

The aim of our study was to estimate sensitivity and specificity of total and individual bile acids and to determine a more reliable cut-off value of transaminases activity for diagnosing ICP.

Material and Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 61 pregnancies complicated by ICP. Inclusion criteria were: skin pruritus starting in the second or third trimester of pregnancy, and elevation of fasting serum total bile acids (TBA) > 10 μmol/L. Exclusion criteria were: chronic liver disease, hepatic viral infections (HAV, HBV, HCV, cytomegalovirus, Herpes simplex virus, Epstein-Barr virus), skin disease, allergic disease, symptomatic cholelithiasis. Patients with ICP were compared with 29 healthy consecutive pregnant women in the second or third trimester of pregnancy. Serum samples were collected prospectively from healthy pregnant and ICP patients. This patients’ cohort is a subgroup of our previously described cases.19 In contrast to the previous study, in the actual retrospective analysis we include only patients having elevation of fasting serum total bile acids (TBA) > 10 μmol/L and control group of healthy pregnant women.

All serum samples were processed in the same laboratory using the same methods and the same reference values: ALT- 5-45 U/L, AST- 5-40 U/L, alkaline phosphatase (AP)- 80- 290 U/L, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (γ-GT)- 5-35 U/L, total bilirubin 2.0-22.0- μmol/L, direct bilirubin- 0-6.8 μmol/L. Serum liver tests were determined using routine laboratory techniques. Fasting serum bile acids and cholic acid (CA), chenodeoxycholic (CDCA), deoxycholic (DCA), lithocholic (LCA), ursodeoxycholic (UDCA) were analyzed by gasliquid chromatography as described previously.20 Fasting serum samples were stored at -20 °C until analyzed.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS software version 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, U.S.A.). Results are presented as median (range) or mean ± SD. The Mann-Whitney test for non-parametric data was used for comparison between groups. Cut-off levels for transaminases were determined. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) of all significant biochemical tests was calculated. The percentage of cases correctly classified by each diagnostic test as well as sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated by discriminant analysis. The likelihood - ratio was calculated according to the formula: positive (LR + ) = sensitivity/1-specificity and negative (LR-) = 1-sensitivity/ specificity. In all cases, tests of significance were two-tailed, with a significance level < 0.05.

Results

The clinical and biochemical characteristics of all patients are shown in the table 1. There were no differences between groups regarding age, gestational age, total bilirubin, γ-GT, DCA, LCA, UDCA levels. Significantly higher levels of ALT, AST, AP, direct bilirubin, TBA, CA, CDCA were found in ICP patients when compared with healthy pregnant women.

Table 1.

Clinical, biochemical characteristics of patients with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and healthy pregnant women.

Patient characteristics Age  28.59 ± 5.71  Healthy pregnant women (n = 29)  p value 0.723 
Gestational age  38.98 ± 2.99  34.07± 4.80  0.367 
ALT U/L  158 (15-7014  20 (11-31)  < 0.0001 
AST U/L  113 (18-554)  17 (10-30)  < 0.0001 
AP U/L  356 (150-900)  210 (156-245)  < 0.0001 
γ-GT U/L  21 (8-89)  23 (19-30)  0.490 
Bilirubin μmol/L  12 (4-94)  12 (9-16)  0.483 
Direct bilirubin μmol/L  5 (1-68)  2 (1-3)  < 0.0001 
TBA μmol/L  32 (11-151)  6 (3-24)  < 0.0001 
CA μmol/L  14 (0-98)  2 (1-7)  < 0.0001 
CDCA μmol/L  13 (1-568)  2 (1-10)  < 0.0001 
DCA μmol/L  3 (0-222)  2 (1-5)  0.792 
UDCA μmol/L  1 (0-6)  0 (0-1)  0.982 
LCA μmol/L  1 (0-4)  0 (0-1)  0.135 
CA/CDCA  1.13 (0.83-1.60)  0.68 (0.52- 0.81)  0.00002 
Values are median (range) or mean ± SD. ALT: alanine aminotransferase. AST: aspartate aminotransferase. AP: alkaline phosphatase. γ-GT: gammaglutamyl transpeptidase. TBA: total bile acid. CA: cholic acid. CDCA: chenodeoxycholic acid. DCA: deoxycholic acid. UDCA: ursodeoxycholic acid. LCA: lithocholic acid. ICP: cholestasis of pregnancy.

ICP patients had higher TBA levels than healthy women (32 vs. 6; p < 0.0001) due to increase in CA, CDCA. We observed TBA increase over upper normal limit (10 μmol/L) in 3 (10%) healthy women: 24.1, 10.8 and 10.7 μmol/L. CA was more elevated than CDCA in 41 (64%) ICP patients. In all healthy patients CDCA was higher than CA. Cholic/ chenodeoxycholic acid ratio was significantly higher in ICP patients compared to healthy pregnant women: 1.13 vs. 0.68; P < 0.00002. Calculation of the area under the curve (AUC) confirmed diagnostic accuracy of all significant biochemical parameters (Table 2). No significant difference was found between sensitivity and specificity of serum TBA, CA and CDCA (Table 3). CA/CDCA < 0.8 resulted in sensitivity 71.9% and specificity 79.3%.

Table 2.

Area under the curve (AUC) of all significant biochemical parameters.

Variable(s)  Area  95% CI 
ALT U/L  0.916  0.91-1.00  < 0.0001 
AST U/L  0.986  0.98-1.00  < 0.0001 
AP U/L  0.976  0.96-0.98  < 0.0001 
Direct bilirubin μmol/L  0.922  0.77-0.98  < 0.0001 
TBA μmol/L  0.853  0.78-0.93  < 0.0001 
CA μmol/L  0.789  0.61-0.95  < 0.0001 
CDCA μmol/L  0.692  0.58-0.8  0.003 
CA/CDCA  0.803  0.69-0.88  < 0.0001 
ALT: alanine aminotransferase. AST: aspartate aminotransferase. AP: alkaline phosphatise. TBA: total bile acid. CA: cholic acid. CDCA: chenodeoxycholic acid.
Table 3.

Sensitivity, specificity, predictive value and likelihood-ratio of total and individual bile acids for the diagnosis of ICP.

  Sensitivity %  Specificity %  Predictive value %    Likelihood-ratio   
      PPV  NPV  Positive  Negative 
TBA μmol/L  94.23  63.41  76.56  89.66  2.58  0.09 
CA μmol/L  96.00  62.79  75.00  93.10  2.58  0.06 
CDCA μmol/L  88.89  58.97  75.00  79.31  2.17  0.19 
PPV: positive predictive value. NPV: negative predictive value. TBA: total bile acid. CA: cholic acid. CDCA: chenodeoxycholic acid.

We intended to establish a more reliable cut-off value of transaminases (Table 4). A cut-off value of ALT 31 U/ L resulted in sensitivity 92.2%, specificity 100% (compared to current range of ALT 45 U/L- sensitivity 90.1%, specificity 100%), and accuracy with -LR of 0.078, a positive predictive value 100%; negative predictive value 85%. When cut-off value of AST 30 U/L was used, sensitivity 92.2%, specificity 100% (current range of AST 40 U/L -sensitivity 90.6%, specificity 100%), accuracy with LR- of 0.078, a positive predictive value 100%; negative predictive value 85%.

Table 4.

Validity of new cut- off levels of transaminases for diagnosis of ICP.

ALT U/L  New cut-off value 31  Sensitivity 92.2  95% CI 82.7-97.4  Specificity 100.0  95% CI 87.9-100.0  p < 0.0001 
AST U/L  30  92.2  82.7-97.4  100.0  87.9-100.0  < 0.0001 
ALT: alanine aminotransferase. AST: aspartate aminotransferase.
Discussion

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is associated with increased risk of fetal complications. Therefore it is important to determine sensitive biochemical parameters that aid in timely diagnosis of this disorder. The present study did not confirm any single specific and sensitive marker for early diagnosis of ICP despite of significantly higher serum TBA and CA levels in addition with markedly elevated CA/CDCA ratio in ICP patients. We also intended to show that adoption of lower limits for transaminases values might increase the effectiveness of case finding for ICP.

The biochemical parameter commonly used in the diagnosis of ICP is determination of the concentration of serum bile acids.1,3 In the large prospective study of perinatal out-comes in women with severe ICP, significant relationships were found between the maternal serum bile acid level and preterm delivery, spontaneous preterm delivery, stillbirth. In this study, the risk of fetal complications was statistically increased at bile acid levels ≥40 μmol/L.7 However, an unexplainable fetal death was reported at 39 weeks despite treatment with UDCA and low bile acid values.21 On the other hand, a study from Argentina showed that asymptomatic hypercholanemia of pregnancy does not necessarily lead to ICP.22 Recently, it has been reported that elevated autotaxin activity is a highly sensitive and specific diagnostic biomarker.17,18 In contrast to the current gold standard for diagnosis total fasting serum bile salt levels, autotaxin is not influenced by food intake.18

In our retrospective analysis we showed that TBA levels alone cannot serve as sensitive and specific marker of the disease. In agreement with other reports we found that the cholic acid level and cholic/chenodeoxycholic acid ratio were significantly higher in ICP patients compared to healthy pregnant women, indicating that CA and CA/ CDCA are more relevant in diagnosis of ICP. Huang, et al. assessed the addition of bile acid CA/CDCA ratio information in diagnosing ICP and found similar results that CA/CDCA ratio contributed little to the diagnosis of ICP. The use of total bile acid and transaminases without bile acid ratios decreased positive tests by less than 2%.14

It is difficult to diagnose ICP only by routine biochemical tests, however, activity of transaminases and direct bilirubin concentration were considerably higher in ICP patients.

Significant increase of AP also was noticed in ICP group compared to healthy patients, but AP is of poor diagnostic value due to placental and bone production. No difference was found in activity of γ-GT in both groups. Genes, et al. found that ALT has a significant, although weaker than level of serum bile acids, positive correlation with preterm delivery.8

The level of transaminases elevation that is considered abnormal varies widely and has recently been brought into question.16 The determination of a more reliable cut-off value for liver tests is very important for diagnosing liver disease. There is also a debate as to whether or not different cutoff's are indicated for normal ranges of liver enzymes. Recently, it has been suggested that the upper normal limit for ALT should be decreased to 30 IU/L for men and 19 IU/L for women.23 Liver function tests can be lower in normal pregnancy than the reference ranges currently used. Girling, et al. in a prospective, cross-sectional study determines reference ranges for liver function tests that allow more precise identification of abnormal liver function in women with pre-eclampsia. Using the new ranges, the prevalence of elevated liver function tests was significantly higher in the pre-eclampsia group (54%) than in those with pregnancy induced hypertension (14%) (P < 0.01).24 We evaluated significance of lower cut-off values for ALT (31 U/L) and AST (30 U/L) in our ICP patients. Decreasing the ULN values for transaminases levels only minimally increased the ability to diagnose ICP. There are some limitations to our retrospective analysis. Relatively small number of healthy controls was included into study and specificity of the test was likely to be lower if a larger control set was used. ICP is a diagnosis of exclusion. In our study we excluded patients with other hepatobiliary and skin diseases. However, in a real world situation there may be coexisting latent hepatobiliary diseases during pregnancy that could also affect the specificity of the tests.25,26

Conclusion

The present study did not reveal any single specific and sensitive marker for reliable diagnosis of ICP despite of significantly higher serum TBA and CA levels and CA:CDCA ratio in ICP patients in comparison to healthy pregnant woman. Establishment of lower cut-off values for transaminases activity might only minimally increase the accuracy of diagnosing ICP.

Abbreviations

  • ALT: alanine aminotransferase.

  • AP: alkaline phosphatase.

  • AST: aspartate aminotransferase.

  • CDCA: chenodeoxycholic acid.

  • CA: cholic acid.

  • DCA: deoxycholic acid.

  • γ-GT: gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase.

  • ICP: intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.

  • LCA: lithocholic acid.

  • TBA: total bile acids.

  • UDCA: ursodeoxycholic acid.

References
[1.]
Riely C.A., Bacq Y..
Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.
Clin Liver Dis, 8 (2004), pp. 167-176
[2.]
Beuers U., Kremer A.E., Bolier R., Elferink R.P..
Pruritus in cholestasis: Facts and fiction.
Hepatology, 60 (2014), pp. 399-407
[3.]
Kondrackiene J., Kupcinskas L..
Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy-current achievements and unsolved problems.
World J Gastroenterol, 14 (2008), pp. 5781-5788
[4.]
Dixon P.H., Wadsworth C.A., Chambers J., Donnelly J., Cooley S., Buckley R., Mannino R., et al.
A comprehensive analysis of common genetic variation around six candidate loci for intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.
Am J Gastroenterol, 109 (2014), pp. 76-84
[5.]
Sookoian S., Castaño G., Burgueño A., Gianotti T.F., Pirola C.J..
Association of the multidrug-resistance-associated protein gene (ABCC2) variants with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.
J Hepatol, 48 (2008), pp. 125-132
[6.]
Germain A.M., Kato S., Carvajal J.A., Valenzuela G.J., Valdes G.L., Glasinovic J.C..
Bile acids increase response and expression of human myometrial oxytocin receptor.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 189 (2003), pp. 577-582
[7.]
Glantz A., Marschall H-U, Mattsson L-A.
Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: relationships between bile acid levels and fetal complication rates.
Hepatology, 4 (2004), pp. 467-474
[8.]
Geenes V., Chappell L.C., Seed P.T., Steer P.J., Williamson C..
Association of severe intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy with adverse pregnancy outcomes: a prospective population-based case-control study.
Hepatology, 59 (2014), pp. 1482-1491
[9.]
Rook M., Vargas J., Caughey A., Bacchetti P., Rosenthal P., Bull L..
Fetal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy in a Northern California cohort.
[10.]
Oztekin D., Aydal I., Oztekin O., Okcu S., Borekci R., Tinar S..
Predicting fetal asphyxia in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.
Arch Gynecol Obstet, 280 (2009), pp. 975-979
[11.]
Kondrackiene J., Beuers U., Zalinkevicius R., Tauschel H.D., Gintautas V., Kupcinskas L..
Predictors of premature delivery in patients with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.
World J Gastroenterol, 13 (2007), pp. 6226-6230
[12.]
Silver R.M., Parker C.B., Goldenberg R., Reddy U.M., Dudley D.J., Saade G.R., Hogue C.J., et al.
Bile acids in a multicenter, population-based case-control study of stillbirth.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 210 (2014), pp. 460
[13.]
Chen J., Deng W., Wang J., Shao Y., Ou M., Ding M..
Primary bile acids as potential biomarkers for the clinical grading of intra-hepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 122 (2013), pp. 5-8
[14.]
Huang W.M., Gowda M., Donnelly J.G..
Bile acid ratio in diagnosis of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.
Am J Perinatol, 26 (2009), pp. 291-294
[15.]
Geenes V., Catherine Williamson C..
Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.
World J Gastroenterol, 15 (2009), pp. 2049-2066
[16.]
Kariv R., Leshno M., Beth-Or A., Strul H., Blendis L., Kokia E., Noff D., et al.
Re-evaluation of serum alanine aminotrans-ferase upper normal limit and its modulating factors in a large-scale population study.
[17.]
Kremer A.E., Martens J.J., Kulik W., Ruëff F., Kuiper E.M., van Bu-uren H.R., van Erpecum K.J., et al.
Lysophosphatidic acid is a potential mediator of cholestatic pruritus.
Gastroenterology, 139 (2010), pp. 1008-1018
[18.]
Kremer A.E., Bolier R., Dixon P.H., Geenes V., Chambers J., To-lenaars D., Ris-Stalpers C., et al.
Autotaxin Activity has a high Accuracy to diagnose Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy.
J Hepatol, 62 (2015), pp. 897-904
[19.]
Kondrackiene J., Beuers U., Kupcinskas L..
Efficacy and safety of ursodeoxycholic acid versus cholestyramine in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.
Gastroenterology, 129 (2005), pp. 894-901
[20.]
Stellaard F., Sackmann M., Sauerbruch T., Paumgartner G..
Simultaneous determination of cholic acid and chenodeoxycholic acid pool sizes and fractional turnover rates in human serum using 13C-labeled bile acids.
J Lipid Res, 25 (1984), pp. 1313-1319
[21.]
Sentilhes L., Verspyck E., Pia P., Marpeau L..
Fetal death in a patient with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.
Obstet Gynecol, 107 (2006), pp. 458
[22.]
Castano G., Lucangioli S., Sookoian S., Mesquida M., Lemberg A., Di Scala M., Franchi P., et al.
Bile acid profiles by capillary electrophoresis in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.
Clin Sci (Lond), 110 (2006), pp. 459-465
[23.]
Prati D., Taioli E., Zanella A., Della Torre E., Butelli S., Del Vec-chio E., Vianello L., et al.
Updated definitions of healthy ranges for serum alanine aminotransferase levels.
Ann Intern Med, 137 (2002), pp. 1-10
[24.]
Girling J.C., Dow E., Smith J.H..
Liver function tests in pre-ec-lampsia: importance of comparison with a reference range derived for normal pregnancy.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 104 (1997), pp. 246-250
[25.]
Ropponen A., Sund R., Riikonen S., Ylikorkala O., Aittomaki K..
Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy as an indicator of liver and biliary diseases: a population-based study.
Hepatology, 43 (2006), pp. 723-728
[26.]
Marschall H.U., Wikström Shemer E., Ludvigsson J.F., Stephansson O..
Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and associated hepatobiliary disease: a population-based cohort study.
Hepatology, 58 (2013), pp. 1385-1391
Copyright © 2017. Fundación Clínica Médica Sur, A.C.
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos