metricas
covid
Buscar en
Cirugía Española (English Edition)
Toda la web
Inicio Cirugía Española (English Edition) Simultaneous treatment: Liver transplantation and median arcuate ligament syndro...
Información de la revista
Vol. 101. Núm. 8.
Páginas 581-584 (agosto 2023)
Vol. 101. Núm. 8.
Páginas 581-584 (agosto 2023)
Scientific letter
Acceso a texto completo
Simultaneous treatment: Liver transplantation and median arcuate ligament syndrome
Tratamiento simultaneo: trasplante hepático y síndrome de ligamento arcuato mediano
Visitas
150
Tamara Viñasa, Paola Melgara,b,
Autor para correspondencia
paomelgar@hotmail.com

Corresponding author at: Servicio de Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Calle Pintor Baeza 11, 03010 Alicante, Spain.
, Cándido Alcázara,b, Gonzalo Rodriguez-Laiza,b, Jose M. Ramiaa,b,c
a Unidad HPB y Trasplante Hepático, Servicio de Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital General Universitario Dr. Balmis, Alicante, Spain
b ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain
c Universidad Miguel Hernández, Spain
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Figuras (1)
Tablas (2)
Table 1A. Characteristics of the patients treated.
Table 1B. Published series.
Mostrar másMostrar menos
Texto completo

Median arcuate ligament (MALS) syndrome involves extrinsic compression of the celiac artery by the fibrous bands of the median arcuate ligament (MAL).1 It was first described in 1917 by Lipshutz et al.,1,2,5 but it was not until 1963 when Harjola et al. performed the first surgeries to treat MALS.1,3 In 1972, Colapinto et al. used CT for the first time for the diagnosis of MALS, and since then it has become the best diagnostic method.4

MALS is usually asymptomatic because collateral circulation develops, but in 10%–25% of cases some type of functional ischemia may occur.1 Symptomatic patients may present abdominal pain with no obvious cause, which may be postprandial or triggered by exercise, as well as weight loss, nausea and vomiting.1,5

MALS that is not correctly evaluated or treated can cause serious complications after supramesocolic surgeries, especially pancreaticoduodenectomy.7 However, the number of publications on patients with MALS undergoing liver transplantation (LT) is very limited, and no internationally accepted recommendations have been published about the best therapeutic strategy to follow.1 It has been suggested that MALS can cause postoperative dysfunction of the liver graft by decreasing the mean flow velocity of the hepatic artery, thereby hindering flow to the graft, which can lead to hepatic artery thrombosis and biliary complications.5 We present our experience in the synchronous treatment of MALS and LT.

Using a prospective database, we have conducted a retrospective observational study of all patients who had undergone LT from September 2012 to December 2021. Patients with preoperative CT scan diagnosis of MALS were selected (Fig. 1). We performed a temporary portacaval shunt and divided the MAL after completing total hepatectomy.

Figure 1.

CT (red arrow) of stenosis of the celiac trunk due to MALS.

(0.07MB).

Within 24 h of LT, Doppler ultrasound was used to confirm the permeability of the arterial flow. The following clinical variables were studied: preoperative (age, sex, etiology of liver disease, MELD, preoperative hemoglobin, and donor risk index [DRI]); intraoperative (cold ischemia time, blood loss, arterial and portal flow pre/post-transplantation, and operative time); and postoperative (complications defined by Clavien-Dindo classification,8 especially vascular, hospital stay, graft and patient survival).

We have operated on 4 patients with MALS, representing an incidence in our series of 1.01% (4/394). There were no complications associated with the division of the MAL. All grafts presented good perfusion after performing the venous and arterial anastomoses, and no post-transplantation vascular or biliary complications were observed. Vascular grafts were not used in any of these patients. Patient data are summarized in Table 1A. The published series on LT and MALS that we reviewed are presented in Table 1B.

Table 1A.

Characteristics of the patients treated.

Data of patients with MALS and LT
Patient  Age  Cause for liver transplant  MELD  Pre-transplantation symptoms  CT scan findings  Pre-op Hb(g/dL)  DRI  Blood loss (mL)  Cold ischemia time(min)  Hepatic artery flow(mL/min)  Portal Flow (mL/min)  Immediate vascular complications  Months after LT  Complications  Resolution of complications  Clavien-Dindo  Hospital stay  IS  Mortality 
43  Alcohol  19  –  Compression of the CA by MAL  9.1  1.26  600  259  185  2920  No  106  Melenas  Endoscopic treatment  IIIA  CorticosteroidsTacrolimusMMF  No 
55  Alcohol  11  Abdominal pain  Significant stenosis of the segment proximal to the CAAneurisms in the gastroduodenal artery and SMA  11.7  1.28  300  284  114  2479  No  107  Deteriorated renal function/kidney failure Hyperglycemia  Insulin  II  Corticosteroids TacrolimusMMF  No 
45  Alcohol  16  Occasional vomitingPyrosis  Dilatation of common hepatic artery  11.6  2.17  620  278  122  1742  No  108  –  –  CorticosteroidsTacrolimusMMFAnti CD25  No 
46  Alcohol  15  –  Compression of the CA without notable collateral circulation; mild stenosis of SMA  9.4  1.96  1500  219  91  1316  No  107  Kidney failure OliguriaAscitesPleural effusion  PrismDrainage  IVA  34  CorticosteroidsTacrolimusMMFAnti CD25  No 

CT: computed tomography. CA: celiac artery. MAL: median arcuate ligament. SMA: superior mesenteric artery. Hb: hemoglobin. DRI: donor risk index. cc: cubic centimeters. LT: liver transplantation.

Table 1B.

Published series.

First author  Study type  PatientsMALS(n)/TH(n) %  Intraoperative variables studied  Treatments  Conclusions 
Fukuzawa et al.1993  Retrospective cohorts  5/307 (1.6%)  Hepatic artery flow 
  • MAL division 3/5(60%)

  • Aorto-hepatic reconstruction 2/5(40%)

 
CA compression reduces hepatic artery flow in the implant. 
Jurim et al.1993  Cohorts retrospective  17/164 (10%)  Hepatic artery flow 
  • MAL division 17/17 (100%)

  • Aorto-hepatic division after unsuccessful MAL division 2/17(12%)

 
The identification of MALS and the division of the MAL are important to prevent potential complications after LT. 
Agnes et al.2001  Cohorts retrospective  5/140(3.6%)  Blood pressureRadial pressureDifferential pressureClinical variation of pressures in respiratory phases. 
  • MAL division 5/5 (100%)

 
Compression of the CA by the MAL should be treated with its division to avoid acute and chronic complications. 
Lubrano et al.2008  Retrospective cohorts  10/168 (6%)  Not available 
  • Aorto-hepatic reconstruction 4/10 (40%)

  • MAL division 1/10 (10%)

 
The presence of MAL does not hinder classic arterial reconstruction. MAL can be divided if necessary. 
Czigany et al.2019  Retrospective cohorts  34/286 (12%)  Cold ischemia timeWarm ischemia timeBlood transfusion 
  • MAL division 26/34 (77%)

  • Reconstruction 4/34 (12%)

 
MAL division is safe and feasible and can be considered in patients with relevant stenosis of the celiac artery observed on preoperative CT scan. 
Gialamas E et al.2022  Retrospective case/control  19/57 (33.3%)  Cold ischemia timeWarm ischemia timeBlood transfusionsAnastomosis type 
  • Gastroduodenal artery preservation8/19 (42.1%)

  • MAL division 3/19 (15.8%)

  • Aorto-hepatic reconstruction 1/19 (5.3%)

  • No treatment 7/19(36.8%)

  • Controls: no treatment

 
No differences were found in the prevalence of biliary and arterial complications between the presence of MAL or no MAL in LT patients. 
Shu -Xuan Li et al.2022  Retrospective cohorts  8/288 (2.7%)  Cold ischemia timeWarm ischemia timeBlood lossBlood transfusionPlasma transfusionOperative timeHepatic artery flow 
  • No intervention 2/8 (25%)

  • Gastroduodenal preservation with splenic artery ligation 3/8 (37.5%)

  • Gastroduodenal artery preservation2/8 (25%)

  • Reoperation with MAL division 1/8 (12.5%)

 
The conservation of collateral circulation between the superior mesenteric artery and the celiac artery through the gastroduodenal artery with or without ligation of the splenic artery is a safe and feasible method for MAL division. 
Viñas et al.2023  Retrospective cohorts  4/394 (1.01%)  Operative timeCold ischemia timeWarm ischemia timeHepatic artery flowPortal flow 
  • MAL division 4/4 (100%)

 
No morbidity associated with MAL divisionNo vascular complications after LT 

MALS: median arcuate ligament syndrome. LT: liver transplant. MAL: median arcuate ligament. CA: celiac artery. CD: Clavien Dindo. CCI: comprehensive complications index.

MALS is an uncommon condition in the general population. According to published series,5 the reported incidence in post-LT patients ranges from 1.6%–33%, although our series had a slightly lower incidence (1%). The symptoms of MALS are non-specific; 2 of our patients presented abdominal pain, which was accompanied by vomiting in one case. The usual symptoms of MALS can be attributed to chronic liver disease.10 Therefore, its diagnosis is difficult and requires thorough radiological evaluation of the pre-transplantation CT scan, thus allowing the surgeon to establish an appropriate intraoperative surgical strategy.1,5,9,10

To date, there are no established treatment recommendations for MALS in patients undergoing LT.1,5 There is a classification of MALS in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy, and the treatment is adapted according to the percentage and length of the stenosis.10 However, it has not been determined whether this algorithm is applicable in LT. Surgical treatment is generally accepted as being required in symptomatic patients, but there is no consensus on treatment in cases with no obvious symptoms.1,5,9,10 Advocates of treating any MALS in patients undergoing LT argue that, if left untreated, the risk of post-LT vascular and biliary complications may increase, while treatment does not increase morbidity.1 Nevertheless, the few published series provide no data confirming a higher incidence of vascular and biliary complications after LT if there is asymptomatic MALS that is not treated.1,6

When treating MALS in patients undergoing LT, therapeutic options include: division of the MAL, preservation of the gastroduodenal artery, or more complex techniques, such as aorto-hepatic bypass or endovascular techniques.5,6,9,10 In our series, we performed division of the MAL in all cases, and no morbidity was observed associated with this technique. One of the possible complications indicated associated with the division of the MAL is that hemorrhage occurs due to the existence of varices and abundant collateral circulation in the area. We believe that the portacaval shunt that we perform in all of our patients minimizes this risk, facilitating division of the MAL.

In conclusion, MALS in patients undergoing LT is rare, usually asymptomatic, and requires a thorough pre-transplantation CT study. There are no therapeutic algorithms with high scientific evidence, but since its treatment does not increase morbidity, we believe that MAL division is advisable to avoid possible postoperative vascular and/or biliary complications.

References
[1]
Z. Czigany, J. Boecker, D.A. Morales, J. Bednarsch, F.A. Meister, I. Amygdalos, et al.
Median arcuate ligament compression in orthotopic liver transplantation: Result from a single-center analysis and a european survey study.
J Clin Med, 8 (2019), pp. 550
[2]
B. Lipshutz.
A composite study of the coeliac axis artery.
[3]
P.T. Harjola.
A rare obstruction of the coeliac artery. Report of a case.
Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn, 52 (1963), pp. 547-550
[4]
R.F. Colapinto, M.J. McLoughlin, L. Gordon.
The routine lateral aortogram and the celiac compression syndrome.
Radiology, 103 (1972), pp. 557-563
[5]
X. Sun, Z. Fan, W. Qiu, Y. Chen, C. Jiang, L.V. Guoyue.
Median arcuate ligament syndrome and arterial anastomotic bleeding inducing hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplantation.
Medicine, 97 (2018),
[6]
S. Agnes, A.W. Avolio, S.C. Magalini, F. Frongillo, M. Castagneto.
Celiac axis compression syndrome in liver transplantation.
Transpl Proc, 33 (2001), pp. 1438-1439
[7]
R.N. Whistance, V. Shah, E.R. Grist, C.P. Shearman, N.W. Pearce, A. Odurny, et al.
Management of median arcuate ligament syndrome in patients who require pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 93 (2011), pp. e4-11
[8]
D. Dindo, N. Demartines, P.A. Clavien.
Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.
[9]
E. Gialamas, M. Assalino, L. Elkrief, F. Apostolidou-Kiouti, A. Piveteau, G. Oldani, et al.
Impact of the presence of median arcuate ligament on biliary complications after liver transplantation.
Clin Transplant, (2022),
[10]
S.X. Li, Y.H. Fan, G.Y. Tian, G.Y. Lv.
Feasible management of median arcuate ligament syndrome in orthotopicliver transplantation recipients.
World J Gastrointest Surg, 14 (2022), pp. 976-985
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos