Stroke is a major global public health problem, affecting 13.7 million people worldwide. Previous studies have found a neuroprotective effect of hypothermia therapy and the efficacy and safety of combined hypothermia and mechanical thrombectomy or thrombolysis in the treatment of ischemic stroke have also attracted attention.
ObjectiveIn the present research, the authors conducted a meta-analysis to comprehensively assess the safety and efficacy of hypothermia combining mechanical thrombectomy or thrombolysis in the treatment of ischemic stroke.
MethodsArticles published from January 2001 to May 2022 were searched from Google Scholar, Baidu Scholar and PubMed to evaluate the clinical significance of hypothermia treatment in ischemic stroke. Complications, short-term mortality, and the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) in the full text was extracted.
Results89 publications were selected and 9 among them were included in this study with sample size of 643. All selected studies are in accordance with the inclusion criteria. Forest plot of clinical characteristics was as follows: complications (RR = 1.132, 95% CI 0.942‒1.361, p = 0.186, I2 = 37.2%), mortality within 3 months (RR = 1.076, 95% CI 0.694‒1.669, p = 0.744, I2 = 0.00%), mRS ≤ 1 at 3 months (RR = 1.138, 95% CI 0.829‒1.563, p = 0.423, I2 = 26.0%), mRS ≤ 2 at 3 months (RR = 1.672, 95% CI 1.236‒2.263, p = 0.001, I2=49.6%) and mRS ≤ 3 at 3 months (RR = 1.518, 95% CI 1.128‒2.043, p = 0.006, I2 = 0.00%). The funnel plot suggested that there was no significant publication bias in the meta-analysis on complications, mortality within 3 months, mRS ≤ 1 at 3 months and mRS ≤ 2 at 3 months.
ConclusionIn summary, the results showed that hypothermia treatment was correlated with mRS ≤ 2 at 3 months, but not linked with complications and mortality within 3 months.
Stroke is a major global public health problem, affecting 13.7 million people worldwide.1,2 In China, more than 2 million new cases occur each year, and stroke causes approximately 1.6 million deaths annually.3 It has been reported that stroke is the leading cause of disability in adults and about 90% of stroke patients are left with some residual deficit.4 Stroke is divided into ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke according to pathology and ischemic stroke patients account for about 85% of all stroke patients.5 A proportion of ischemic stroke patients will have varying degrees of sequelae due to limb dysfunction after treatment, which directly reduces the quality of life of patients and increases the burden on family members and society.6 In view of the high disability rate of ischemic stroke, improving the prognosis of patients is of great significance in the treatment of ischemic stroke.
The use of hypothermia as a therapeutic agent can be traced back over 5000 years to an ancient Egyptian document, the Edwin Smith Papyrus. In those times, hypothermia therapy, which involved using ice packs, was used to treat hemorrhage and was also widely employed for comatose patients and cardiac arrest, among other conditions.7 Hypothermia is the reduction of the whole body or local temperature to a target value by means of physical or pharmacological treatment to produce therapeutic or protective effects.8 Previous studies have found a neuroprotective effect of hypothermia therapy and have demonstrated this in the treatment of global cerebral ischemia after cardiac arrest and in neonatal ischemic and hypoxic encephalopathy.9–11 Recent research has shown that hypothermia can provide neuroprotection by reducing metabolism, limiting free radical production, improving inflammation, and inhibiting excitotoxicity and apoptosis. Additionally, the significance of cold-inducible proteins as a crucial component of hypothermic neuroprotection has been recognized.12 In recent years, the efficacy and safety of combined hypothermia and mechanical thrombectomy or thrombolysis in the treatment of ischemic stroke have also attracted attention. Some studies have found a higher rate of adverse effects in patients with ischemic stroke after hypothermia,13 while others have shown no difference in adverse effects between patients treated with hypothermia and conventional treatment.14 In addition, more studies have found that hypothermia treatment improves the prognosis of patients with ischemic stroke.15 However, the safety and efficacy of combined hypothermia thrombolysis as well as thrombolytic therapy in ischemic stroke are not fully understood. And some results in different studies show different trends.
In the present research, the authors conducted a meta-analysis to comprehensively assess the value of hypothermia combining mechanical thrombectomy or thrombolysis in the treatment of ischemic stroke. What's more, the authors analyzed the relationship between hypothermia treatment and post-treatment adverse effects, short-term mortality, and prognosis in patients with ischemic stroke. This study might give deeper insights into the clinical value of hypothermia in ischemic stroke treatment.
MethodsPublication search strategyAll the related literature from January 2001 to May 2022 were obtained from PubMed, Google Scholar, and Baidu Scholar on October 21, 2022. The following keywords were used in the search: ischemic stroke, AIS, cerebral artery occlusion, hypothermia, NPC, thrombectomy, thrombolysis and prognosis. English language and the human species were set as the restrictions. Review articles' and linked publications' reference lists were also looked through in an effort to find any possibly pertinent research. All publications' titles and abstracts were examined first, and then the complete texts of the surviving papers were assessed once again to make sure they still fit the selection criteria.
Inclusion and exclusion criteriaThe inclusion criteria for the studies were as follows: 1) Study published from 2001 to 2022; 2) Patients in the studies must be diagnosed with ischemic stroke by CT or MRI according to the latest guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute ischemic stroke; 3) Exploring the clinical efficacy and prognostic relevance of hypothermia treatment in ischemic stroke patients; 4) The data in the studies should be enough to calculate the Odds Ratio (OR); 5) Displaying outcomes in the form of Hazard Ratio (HR) with 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI); 6) The full text of the study could be achieved. The exclusion criteria were listed below 1) Animal experiments, cell studies, and other laboratory research; 2) Comments, reviews, letters, and conference abstracts; 3) Articles in non-English; 4) Insufficient data or information to obtain HR; 5) Studies using duplicated data. All patients included in these studies were older than 18 years and excluded patients with severe infections, severe liver, kidney, malignancy, ischemic cardiomyopathy, myocardial infarction, and unstable angina affecting the outcome of the trial.
Data extractionThe following data from the full text were extracted: name of the first author, publication year, study period, country of the patients, treatment method, the number of total cases, the number of patients with hypothermia and conventional treatment, complications, short-term mortality, and the modified Rankin Scale (mRS).
Statistical analysisAll of the HRs and associated 95% CIs were determined via Stata software 16.0 was used to conduct the statistical analysis (Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas, USA). Analysis was done on the relationship between clinical outcomes and hypothermia treatment. Q statistic p-value 0.10 or I2value >50% was used to establish significant heterogeneity. If there was no heterogeneity among the included studies, a fixed-effects model was employed; otherwise, a random-effects model was. The funnel plot and Egger's test were used to assess the publication bias; p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
ResultsSearch results and study characteristicsIn the initial stage, 89 publications were identified, of which 38 relevant publications were excluded for lacking sufficient data or not reporting ischemic stroke. In the remaining 41 articles, 29 articles with animal studies or incomplete were further excluded after evaluation of the full text. Among the rest 12 publications, three of them did not meet the inclusion criteria due to the lack of relevant clinical outcomes such as complications and prognosis. Therefore, 9 articles with 643 patients were included and data were extracted from them.13–21 All the included studies analyzed the safety and efficacy of combined clinical hypothermia therapy in ischemic stroke. Detailed search results are shown in Figure 1.
As shown in Table 1, 9 references were included published from 2001 to 2021. The total number of patients with gastric cancer in 9 studies was 643 ranging from 19 to 120. Six studies were randomized controlled trials while three studies were observational cohort trials. In addition, six studies reported post-treatment complications (intracranial hemorrhage, extracranial hemorrhage, pulmonary infection, etc.) and mortality within 3 months of treatment, six studies reported the number of people with mRS ≤ 1 at 3 months, five studies reported the number of people with mRS ≤ 2 at 3 months and four studies reported the number of people with mRS ≤ 3 at 3 months.
Clinical and histopathologic data of the patients.
H, Hypothermia Treatment; C, Conventional treatment; RCT, Randomized Controlled Trial; OCT, Observational Cohort Trial; N/A, Not Available.
An analysis was conducted on the correlation between hypothermia treatment and clinical outcomes of ischemic stroke patients. As shown in Figure 2, the results indicated that hypothermia treatment was not associated with complications (RR = 1.132, OR = 1.291, 95% CI 0.942‒1.361, p = 0.186, I2 = 37.2%), mortality within 3 months (RR = 1.076, OR = 1.091, 95% CI 0.694‒1.669, p = 0.744, I2 = 0.00%) and mRS ≤ 1 at 3 months (RR = 1.138, OR = 1.207, 95% CI 0.829‒1.563, p = 0.423, I2 = 26.0%). However, treatment with hypothermia combined and mechanical thrombectomy or thrombolysis was highly correlated with mRS ≤ 2 at 3 months (RR = 1.672, OR = 2.275, 95% CI 1.236‒2.263, p = 0.001, I2 = 49.6%) and mRS ≤ 3 at 3 months (RR = 1.518, OR = 2.260, 95% CI 1.128‒2.043, p = 0.006, I2 = 0.00%).
Publication bias
Subsequently, the authors conducted an analysis of publication bias of the articles included by using funnel plots and Egger's test for all the clinicopathological characteristics above. The funnel plot suggested that there was no significant publication bias in the meta-analysis on complications, mortality within 3 months, mRS ≤ 1 at 3 months and mRS ≤ 2 at 3 months (p > 0.05, Fig. 3). However, funnel plots showed significant publication bias in meta-analysis for mRS ≤ 3 at 3 months (p = 0.019).
Discussion
Even though intravenous thrombolysis and thrombectomy can effectively treat ischemic stroke, there are still many patients with poor prognoses during treatment and recovery. Due to various conditions such as time window and Cerebral Ischemia-Reperfusion (CI/R) injury after revascularization, there are still some stroke patients who cannot benefit from revascularization therapy after the onset of stroke, so cerebral protection therapy is crucial, and hypothermia therapy is an important one of the non-pharmacological cerebral protection strategies.22 However, the safety and efficacy of combined hypothermia thrombolysis as well as thrombolytic therapy in ischemic stroke treatment are still unclear. In the present study, the authors conducted a meta-analysis to investigate whether hypothermia treatment was correlated with clinical outcomes and prognosis of ischemic stroke patients by analyzing 9 references. The authors demonstrated that hypothermia treatment was associated with mRS ≤ 2 at 3 month in ischemic stroke patients.
Since ischemic stroke patients are generally elderly, an increasing number of studies have focused on the safety of patients with ischemic stroke after treatment. Some new methods were exploring ways to reduce adverse effects during patient treatment. Chung et al. indicated that mesenchymal stem cell treatment was feasible and safe for treating ischemic stroke patients but have no impact on patient prognosis.23 A meta-analysis by Xu et al. confirmed that DL-3-N-Butylphthalide (NBP), a drug that appears to have better efficacy in the treatment of ischemic stroke, is more detrimental to patients' liver function.24 Another meta-analysis of ischemic stroke treatment found that dual antiplatelet therapy was superior to mono antiplatelet therapy in terms of post-treatment complications and mortality (RR = 0.73; 95% CI 0.65‒0.82, p < 0.001).25 All studies were trying to find some new treatments to protect ischemic stroke patients. Given the protective effect of hypothermia in ischemia-reperfusion injury, several studies have attempted to explore the role of hypothermia in ischemic stroke.26,27 However, up to now, no more meta-analysis was reported on the safety of hypothermia combining mechanical thrombectomy or thrombolysis in the treatment of ischemic stroke. In the present meta-analysis, the authors found that hypothermia treatment was not associated with complications and mortality within 3 months. In other words, there is no difference between hypothermia treatment and conventional treatment in terms of safety.
Numerous studies have shown that hypothermia has a significant protective effect on the nervous system and is scientifically effective in improving neurological impairment.28 A randomized controlled trial by Catherine et al. showed a higher rate of normal survival at discharge in the hypothermia group (38%) than in the normothermic group of 84 Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy (HIE) infants (30%), with a rate of 1.29 (95% CI 0.84‒1.99).29 Another meta-analysis suggested that hypothermia treatment reduced mortality (RR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.99; p = 0.04) and poor outcomes (RR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.99, p = 0.04) in comatose patients after cardiac arrest.30 A meta-analysis by Crompton et al. on therapeutic hypothermia for adult and pediatric brain injury found that compared to adults kept at normal body temperature, those who received therapeutic hypothermia had an 18% lower mortality rate (RR = 0.82; 95% CI 0.70‒0.96; p = 0.01) and a 35% improvement in neurological outcomes (RR = 1.35; 95% CI 1.18‒1.54; p < 0.00001).31 However, another meta-analysis on therapeutic hypothermia for adult traumatic brain injury found that the therapeutic hypothermia group had a significantly higher mortality rate (RR = 1.26, 95% CI 1.04‒1.53, p = 0.02).32 In addition, some other studies have shown different results, concluding that hypothermia does not improve patient outcomes, suggesting that more trials are needed in the future to determine the efficacy of clinical hypothermia treatment.33,34
The effect of hypothermia treatment on ischemia-reperfusion injury had been extensively studied experimentally in animal studies. Overall, most studies had concluded that hypothermia has a protective effect on ischemia-reperfusion injury.35–37
But in clinical studies, some studies showed different conclusions on the prognosis of ischemic stroke patients. Krieger's study15 demonstrated ischemic stroke patients have significantly better outcomes (mRS ≤ 2 at 3 months) after hypothermia than conventional treatment while Piironen21 concluded that there was no difference in patient outcomes between the two treatment methods (64% vs. 64%). Thus, meta-analysis is necessary to further understand the role of hypothermia treatment in ischemic stroke patient's prognosis. Here, the authors demonstrated that hypothermia treatment was correlated with mRS ≤ 2 at 3 months and mRS ≤ 3 at 3 months, but not linked with mRS ≤ 1 at 3 month. However, Egger's test showed significant publication bias in meta-analysis for mRS ≤ 3 at 3 months, meaning that more studies need to be included in the future to verify this conclusion.
The present study also has some limitations. Firstly, the references included in the meta-analysis is limited. Secondly, no subgroup analysis was performed. Thus, more clinical research is still needed to confirm the results.
ConclusionIn conclusion, the authors conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the safety and efficacy of hypothermia combining mechanical thrombectomy or thrombolysis in the treatment of ischemic stroke patients. Results showed that hypothermia treatment was correlated mRS ≤ 2 at 3 months, but not linked with complications and mortality within 3 months. This study might provide a deeper understanding of the association of hypothermia on ischemic stroke treatment.
FundingDoctor of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Planned project in 2021 in Jiangsu Province (JSSCBS20211551).
Received 12 February 2023
Accepted 24 April 2023