metricas
covid
Buscar en
Endocrinología, Diabetes y Nutrición (English ed.)
Toda la web
Inicio Endocrinología, Diabetes y Nutrición (English ed.) RECALSEEN 2021. Resources and quality in the Endocrinology and Nutrition units o...
Información de la revista
Vol. 70. Núm. 7.
Páginas 459-467 (agosto - septiembre 2023)
Visitas
351
Vol. 70. Núm. 7.
Páginas 459-467 (agosto - septiembre 2023)
Original article
Acceso a texto completo
RECALSEEN 2021. Resources and quality in the Endocrinology and Nutrition units of the National Health System of Spain
RECALSEEN 2021. La atención al paciente en las unidades de Endocrinología y Nutrición del Sistema Nacional de Salud
Visitas
351
Javier Santamariaa,1, Irene Bretónb,1, Alberto Fernándezc, Felicia Hanzud, Raúl Luquee, Pedro Pinésf, Cristina Tejerag, Ana Zugastih, Náyade del Pradoi, Javier Elolai,
Autor para correspondencia
fjelola@movistar.es

Corresponding author.
, Javier Escaladaj,1
a Vocal de la Sociedad Española de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario de Cruces, Barakaldo, Bizcaia, Spain
b Presidenta de la Fundación de la Sociedad Española de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
c Secretario de la Sociedad Española de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario de Móstoles, Madrid, Spain
d Vocal de la Sociedad Española de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
e Vocal de la Sociedad Española de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Universidad de Córdoba/Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain
f Vocal de la Sociedad Española de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete, Albacete, Spain
g Vocal de la Sociedad Española de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Ferrol, El Ferrol, Spain
h Vocal de la Sociedad Española de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
i Fundación Instituto para la Mejora de la Asistencia Sanitaria (IMAS), Madrid, Spain
j Presidente de la Sociedad Española de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
Ver más
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Resumen
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Tablas (6)
Table 1. Structure of the S-U_EyN in hospitals by hospital size (2020).
Table 2. S-U_EyN service portfolio (2020).
Table 3. Indicators of clinical activity by healthcare resource. RECALSEEN survey.
Table 4. Good practices in the S-U_EyN (2020).
Table 5. Comparison of indicators between health services of the autonomous communities (2020).
Table 6. Full service portfolio vs. RECALSEEN survey (2020).
Mostrar másMostrar menos
Material adicional (1)
Abstract
Objectives

RECALSEEN project aims to analyze the structure, activity, and outcomes of the departments of endocrinology and nutrition (S-U_EyN) of the Spanish National Health System (SNHS). Based on the results obtained, the challenges for the specialty are analyzed and proposals for improvement policies are made. In this paper 2021 survey data and activity data from the 2007–2019 from the Minimum Basic Data Set (MBDS) are presented.

Material and methods

Cross-sectional descriptive study of the S-U_EyN of acute general hospitals of the NHS in 2020. Data were obtained through: 1. an "ad hoc" survey answered by the S-U_EyN’ consultants; and 2. analysing the acute general hospital discharges from S-U_EyN and discharges with endocrine-metabolic comorbidities registered in the minimum basis data set (MBDS) of the SNHS.

Results

112 responses from S-U_EyN were obtained from a total of 154 general acute hospitals of the NHS (73%). The 2021 S-U_EyN sample includes 24 more centers than in 2017. 54% of the S-U_EyN were endocrinology departments. The median number of endocrinologists per S-U_EyN was 7. The estimated rate of endocrinologists was 2.5 per 100,000 inhabitants. S-U_EyN showed a high level of collaboration with primary care teams and other hospital units. Use of telemedicine by S-U_EyN experienced a high increase in 2020. Notable differences in resources and activity have been found between hospitals and Autonomous Communities. There was a wide margin for improvement in quality management.

Conclusions

RECALSEEN is a useful project for the analysis of S-U_EyN. The remarkable variability found in the indicators of structure, activity and management probably indicates a wide margin for improvement.

Keywords:
Endocrinology
Management
Efficiency
Quality
Resumen
Objetivos

RECALSEEN tiene por objetivo analizar la estructura, actividad y resultados de los Servicios y Unidades de Endocrinología y Nutrición (S-U_EyN) del Sistema Nacional de Salud español (SNS), así como, a partir de los resultados obtenidos, analizar los retos para la especialidad y realizar propuestas de políticas de mejora. En este artículo se presentan los datos de la encuesta de 2021 y datos de actividad procedentes del Conjunto Mínimo Básico de Datos (CMBD) de 2007–2019.

Material y métodos

Estudio descriptivo transversal de los S-U_EyN en hospitales generales de agudos del SNS en 2020. Se han utilizado datos obtenidos mediante RECALSEEN 2021, una encuesta “ad hoc” y de las altas dadas por los S-U_EyN registradas en el conjunto mínimo de datos (CMBD) del SNS (2019). La encuesta ha recogido datos de actividad de 2019 y 2020.

Resultados

Se obtuvieron 112 respuestas de S-U_EyN sobre un total de 154 hospitales generales de agudos del SNS (73%). La muestra de S-U_EyN incluyó 24 centros más que en 2017. El 54% de los S-U_EyN que respondieron eran servicios o unidades de gestión clínica. La mediana de endocrinólogos por S-U_EyN fue de 7, siendo la tasa estimada de endocrinólogos por cada 100.000 habitantes de 2,5. Los S-U_EyN tienen un elevado nivel de colaboración con unidades de atención primaria y hospitalarias. En 2020 se produjo un importante desarrollo de la telemedicina. Se encontraron notables diferencias en recursos y actividad entre centros y Comunidades Autónomas. En relación con la gestión de la calidad e implantación de buenas prácticas seguía existiendo un amplio margen de mejora.

Conclusiones

RECALSEEN es un proyecto que ofrece información relevante sobre los S-U_EyN. La notable variabilidad hallada en los indicadores de estructura, actividad y gestión probablemente indica un amplio margen de mejora.

Palabras clave:
Endocrinología
Gestión
Eficiencia
Calidad
Texto completo
Introduction

RECALSEEN is a Sociedad Española de Endocrinología y Nutrición [Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition] (SEEN) project that began in 2017 in the context of envisioning significant challenges arising from the increasing prevalence of health problems typical of the specialty and the progressive technification of diagnostic and therapeutic processes,1–3 framed within the SEEN’s commitment to professionalism.4,5 The need to provide information on the resources, activity and quality of endocrinology and nutrition services and units (S-U_EyN) in order to make health policy proposals based on data has become even more evident as a result of the effects that the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has had on the functioning of health services, including the need for their transformation and the impetus for “digitisation” of health.6,7 The RECALSEEN project, developed by the SEEN with the collaboration of the IMAS (Instituto para la mejora de la asistencia sanitaria [Institute for Health Care Improvement]) Foundation, aims to: (1) Gain information on healthcare in the S-U_EyN for endocrinology diseases and nutritional disorders; and (2) Develop proposals to improve the quality and efficiency of care for these conditions. The RECALSEEN project has two main sources of information: the RECALSEEN survey and the Spanish National Health System (SNHS) Minimum Basic Data Set (MBDS) database.

The RECALSEEN survey in 2017 received responses from 88 S-U_EyN hospitals with 600 ± 360 beds (median 500) and a population coverage of 58%. The most relevant conclusions included: predominantly outpatient activity of the S-U_EyN (consultation, interconsultation and day hospital); integration of nutrition units in the S-U_EyN, but with low staffing provision; progressive development of specialist units; greater participation of the S-U_EyN in multidisciplinary units, as well as the significant variability found in the indicators of structure, activity and management of the S-U_EyN.1

The aim of this article is to present the most relevant results obtained in 2021, as well as to analyse changes and progress since 2017. Finally, we suggest changes that the S-U_EyN should consider in order to offer an appropriate response to the challenges identified by the findings of the RECALSEEN project.3

Material and methods

This was a descriptive, cross-sectional study conducted with the S-U_EyN of the SNHS. The universe included S-U_EyN located in general acute care hospitals with 200 or more beds, whilst, as in 2017, surveys of S-U_EyN from hospitals with fewer than 200 beds were also included. The questionnaire used for data collection is shown in Appendix B additional material (Table 1, annex). The registration data were self-managed online by those responsible for the S-U_EyN. The management and debugging of the questionnaire have been described in other publications.1,8 The data collected through the survey referred to the year 2020, except for activity for which data were requested for the years 2019 and 2020. The survey opened on 1 May and closed on 1 October 2021. The MBDS data correspond to the period 2007–2019.

Statistical analysis

The qualitative variables are described with frequency distribution (number of cases and percentages) and the quantitative variables with the mean, median, standard deviation (SD) and interquartile range (IQR). The Chi-squared test was used to compare qualitative variables, and the Student's t-test to compare quantitative variables. Trend analyses were performed using Poisson regression. All comparisons rejected the null hypothesis with an alpha error <0.05. Statistical analyses were performed with STATA version 17.0.

Results

Out of a total of 154 general acute care hospitals of the SNHS, there were 112 responses (73%) from S-U_EyN (24 S-U_EyN more than in 2017). Nine S-U_EyN were from centres with fewer than 200 beds and one from a private hospital. One centre was exclusively paediatric. The number of beds in the hospitals where the S-U_EyN were located was 555 ± 297, not statistically different from the 2017 survey (602 ± 361; p = 0.332). All the data from the S-U_EyN that responded to the RECALSEEN survey were considered for the analyses. The distribution of responses by autonomous community is shown in Appendix B, Table 2 of the additional material (annex). The estimated population of the catchment areas of the S-U_EyN that responded to the survey represented 76% of the total Spanish population as of 1 July 2020 (INE [Instituto Nacional de Estadística (Spanish National Institute of Statistics)]). Fifty-seven (51%) of the S-U_EyN that responded were from hospitals with 500 or more beds.

Structure and resources

In total, 54% of the S-U_EyN that completed the survey were clinical management units or services, and 36%, sections. The Nutrition unit was integrated into the S-U_EyN in 89% of cases. The median number of affiliated endocrinologists was seven (mean: 8.1 ± 4.7). The rate of endocrinologists estimated by the survey was 2.5 per 100,000 inhabitants in the SNHS.

The S-U_EyN had 4.5 nurses (median; average: 5.4 ± 3.3) assigned to the service (including those assigned to functional tests and excluding hospitalisation); two nurses (median; mean: 2.8 ± 1.7) assigned to diabetes education; 73% of the S-U_EyN had nurses assigned to nutrition (median: 1.3); 63% of the S-U_EyN had nurses assigned to obesity education (median: 1) and 61%, dieticians-nutritionists (median: 2). On many occasions, educational roles are carried out by the same person, which is why the distribution between activities has been estimated in these cases. Important differences were found in relation to the structure and resources of the S-U_EyN depending on the complexity of the hospital (Table 1).

Table 1.

Structure of the S-U_EyN in hospitals by hospital size (2020).

S-U_EyN structure  <500 beds  ≥500 beds 
Number of beds (hospital)  311 ± 105  790 ± 223  – 
Population in the catchment area of the S-U_EyN  221,993 ± 124,009  422,299 ± 214,172  – 
Total number of endocrinologists assigned to the service  4.9 ± 2.8  11.2 ± 4.1  <0.001 
Endocrinologists per 100,000 inhabitants  2.3 ± 0.9  2.9 ± 0.9  0.005 
Ratio of endocrinologists per 100 beds at the centre  1.6 ± 0.7  1.5 ± 0.6  0.296 
Nutrition Unit integrated in the S-U_EyN  80%  98%  0.002 
No. of consultation rooms  4.1 ± 1.8  9.4 ± 4.6  <0.001 
S-U_EyN day hospitala  47%  47%  0.992 
% S-U_EyN with assigned beds  45%  91%  <0.001 
No. ultrasound machines in the S-U_EyN  1.3 ± 0.6  2.0 ± 1.1  <0.001 
No. diabetes nurse educatorsb  2.1 ± 1.3  3.4 ± 1.7  <0.001 
% of S-U_EyN with nurses dedicated to nutritionb  51%  98%  <0.001 
No. nurses dedicated to nutritionb  1.3 ± 0.8  2.0 ± 1.8  0.073 
% of S-U_EyN with obesity education nursesb  61.8%  64.9%  0.734 
No. obesity education nursesb  0.83 ± 0.38  1.2 ± 0.89  0.029 
% of S-U_EyN with food technologists  4%  12%  0.092 
% of S-U_EyN with dieticians-nutritionistsb  49%  72%  0.013 
% of S-U_EyN with nutrition technicians  11%  28%  0.022 

S-U_EyN, endocrinology and nutrition services and units; No., number.

a

The RECALSEEN 2021 survey did not specifically ask about diabetes day hospital.

b

The distribution of nurses in activities is partly conventional, since the overlapping of functions in nursing and also with dieticians-nutritionists is not uncommon.

Service portfolio

Some 97% of the S-U_EyN said that they had a structured relationship of some kind with primary care, while 70% of the S-U_EyN had developed an interconsultation service or unit with other hospital departments. Table 2 shows the service portfolio in specialist and technical units of the S-U_EyN in 2020. More than 50% of the S-U_EyN had units specifically for continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) (73%), morbid obesity (69%), thyroid cancer (66%), type 1 diabetes (64%), diabetes and pregnancy (64%), high-resolution thyroid nodule (63%) and telemedicine in diabetes mellitus (60%). In terms of techniques, in 2020 > 50% of the S-U_EyN performed CSII insertion (83%), thyroid ultrasound (82%), home nutrition (79%), bioelectrical impedance analysis (76%) and fine needle aspiration of the thyroid (54%).

Table 2.

S-U_EyN service portfolio (2020).

Service portfolio  Total  <500 beds  ≥500 beds  pa 
Specialist consultations
CSII  73%  55%  91%  <0.001 
Multidisciplinary morbid obesity  69%  47%  90%  <0.001 
Multidisciplinary thyroid cancer  66%  45%  86%  <0.001 
Type 1 diabetes  64%  55%  74%  0.035 
Multidisciplinary gestational diabetes  64%  53%  75%  0.012 
High-resolution thyroid nodule  63%  45%  79%  <0.001 
Diabetes telemedicine  60%  47%  72%  0.008 
Nutritional treatment of chronic diseases  46%  16%  75%  <0.001 
Multidisciplinary pituitary disorders  46%  22%  70%  <0.001 
Neuroendocrine tumours  42%  18%  65%  <0.001 
Oropharyngeal dysphagia  42%  27%  56%  0.002 
Diabetic foot  38%  29%  47%  0.047 
Gender identity disorders  35%  16%  53%  <0.001 
Lipids  33%  20%  46%  0.004 
Adrenal disorders  31%  18%  44%  0.003 
Multidisciplinary eating disorder  29%  16%  40%  0.005 
Bone metabolism  14%  9%  19%  0.123 
Inborn errors of metabolism  13%  0%  25%  <0.001 
Fertility  4%  2%  5%  0.326 
Techniques
CSII  83%  67%  98%  <0.001 
Parathyroid ultrasound  82%  71%  93%  0.002 
Home parenteral and enteral nutrition  79%  69%  88%  0.016 
Bioelectrical impedance analysis  76%  64%  88%  0.003 
Thyroid fine needle aspiration  54%  36%  70%  <0.001 
Peripheral Doppler ultrasound  45%  31%  58%  0.004 
Electroretinogram  35%  24%  46%  0.015 
Bone density scan (DEXA)  29%  15%  44%  0.001 
Thyroid nodule percutaneous ethanol injection  28%  15%  40%  0.002 
Carotid Doppler ultrasound  27%  11%  42%  <0.001 
Thyroid nodule radiofrequency ablation  17%  2%  32%  <0.001 
Calorimetry  15%  4%  26%  0.001 
Neurotester  14%  7%  21%  0.037 
Thyroid nodule laser ablation  3%  0%  5%  0.085 

CSII, continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion; DEXA, dual X-ray absorptiometry; S-U_EyN, endocrinology and nutrition services and units.

Blank answers were considered “No”.

a

Comparison between S-U_EyN in hospitals with <500 and ≥500 beds.

ActivityMBDS

A progressive decrease in hospital discharges from the S-U_EyN (MBDS) was observed in the period from 2007 to 2019 (10,617 discharges in 2007 and 8,269 in 2019; IRR: 0.981; p < 0.001). Attendances (annual discharges from the S-U_EyN per 100,000 inhabitants over 17 years of age) fell from a rate of 28 in 2007 to 21 in 2019 (−25%) (IRR: 0.981; p < 0.001). The decrease in hospital attendances was accompanied by a decrease in the average length of stay in the discharges from the S-U_EyN, from 7.4 days in 2007 to 6.1 days in 2019 (IRR: 0.981; p < 0.001).

Survey

Table 3 shows the clinical activity of the S-U_EyN in 2019 and 2020 collected from the RECALSEEN survey. Overall, 66% of the S-U_EyN who responded to the survey had assigned hospitalisation beds. No clinically relevant differences were found in the activity of the S-U_EyN, with the exception of the notable increase in attendances of remote consultations, which went from two (2019) to 12 (2020) consultations of this type per 1,000 inhabitants per year. In all the activity indicators there was a wide variability between S-U_EyN. In relation to the tests/activities performed by the S-U_EyN, significant record problems were detected, which is why they are not included in this article, and can be consulted in the RECALSEEN 2021 report.9

Table 3.

Indicators of clinical activity by healthcare resource. RECALSEEN survey.

Resource/indicator  2019  2020 
Conventional hospitalisation
% of S-U_EyN with ≥12 hospital discharges/year  72%  66% 
Average discharges/yeara  92 ± 74  87 ± 70 
Mean length of hospital staya  4.9 ± 2.3  5.1 ± 2.2 
Day hospital
Day hospital patients/year (median)  1,400  1,600 
Consultation and interconsultation
Average interhospital consultations/year  1,250  1,400 
First consultations/year (attendances: consultations per thousand inhabitants)  11  11 
Ratio of successive:first consultations (annual average)  3.7  4.3 ± 4 
Remote consultationsb/year (attendances: consultations per 1,000 inhabitants/year)  12 

S-U_EyN, endocrinology and nutrition services and units.

a

In the S-U_EyN that had hospital discharges.

b

Including first and successive.

Research and training

In total, 22% of the S-U_EyN had professionals dedicated to research, with a median for these units of 1.5 full-time professionals. Some 20% of the S-U_EyN that responded to the survey were integrated into a stable organisational structure (RETIC [REd Temática de Investigación Cooperativa (collaborative thematic research network)] or CIBER [Centro de Investigación Biomédica En Red (biomedical research centre network)]) promoted by the Instituto Carlos III [Carlos III Institute]. Overall, 60% of the S-U_EyN had, in 2020, active research projects from national or international, public or private competitive tenders. Fifty-one percent (51%) were involved in clinical trials, with a median of three trials for these units. In 67% of the units, at least one member of the service/unit had published in journals with an impact factor in the last two years. Some 56% of units participated in national disease registries.

Fifty-two percent (52%) of the S-U_EyN that responded to the survey were accredited for postgraduate training. Accredited units had a median of one resident in training per specialty year. In total, sixty percent of the units provided training to dieticians-nutritionists.

Thirteen percent of the S-U_EyN that responded to the survey had at least one professor, and 25%, at least one tenured professor, while 66% had at least one professor associated with the university.

Good practices

Table 4 shows the data on the implementation of good practices. In total, 45% of S-U_EyN had developed healthcare processes, with a median of three processes per unit, and 22% had quality certifications.

Table 4.

Good practices in the S-U_EyN (2020).

Good practice 
Healthcare team multidisciplinary meetings  86% 
Quality manager in the service/unit  33% 
Does the S-U_EyN hold clinical sessions?  88% 
Are these sessions accredited?  40% 
Periodic sessions with other hospital departments (neurosurgery, paediatrics, endocrine surgery, ENT, nuclear medicine, radiology, etc.)  87% 
Process management
Does the service/unit have a process map?  34% 
Has process management been implemented for the unit's most relevant processes?  39% 
No. of processes performed by the unit  45% units with a median of 3 processes 
Presence of S-U_EyN quality commission professionals  60% 
Presence of S-U_EyN safety manager  27% 
Certification of the S-U_EyN (ISO, EFQM, etc.)  22% 

S-U_EyN, endocrinology and nutrition services and units.

Differences between autonomous communities

The lower the percentage of S-U_EyN that responded, as well as their population coverage, the lower the reliability of the estimates from the health services of the autonomous communities based on the RECALSEEN survey data. In this respect, the estimates for Aragon and Extremadura, which are below 50%, are not reliable, and those for Andalusia, Catalonia, the Balearic Islands and Murcia, which are below 70%, should be regarded with caution. Even with the aforementioned precaution, notable differences in endocrinology resources and activity between the health services of the autonomous communities are evident (Table 5).

Table 5.

Comparison of indicators between health services of the autonomous communities (2020).

  No. of S-U_EyN/Totala  % Pop.b  Rate of endocrinologistsc  Rate of endocrinology bedsc  S-U_EyN attendancesc  Rate of interconsultationsc  Rate of first consultationsd  Mean consultation delaye  DHf  Ratio Suc:Firg  % Nutritional assessmenth 
Andalusia  10/15  72%  19.4  3.3  60.7  5.0  8.0  28.2  100%  2.6  90% 
Aragon  2/5  52%  29.0  14.5  401.4  13.9  13.7  22.3  0%  4.1  100% 
Asturias  3/4  62%  27.3  13.7  251.6  14.5  4.9  45.4  33%  2.9  100% 
Canary Islands  4/5  62%  31.6  8.0  153.9  7.9  5.7  37.9  25%  6.4  33% 
Cantabria  2/2  98%  28.0  8.7  255.2  4.5  7.8  50.0  50%  4.8  0% 
Castile and León  9/11  83%  26.0  10.5  299.9  5.4  9.7  18.7  33%  3.9  83.3% 
Castile-La Mancha  7/8  81%  27.0  4.8  165.0  8.1  10.5  25.1  0%  3.1  57% 
Catalonia  16/27  83%  19.9  3.9  116.5  5.2  5.0  49.5  88%  4.6  60% 
Valencian Community  17/22  85%  21.1  7.1  218.9  7.9  10.6  30.5  18%  6.3  41.1% 
Extremadura  2/6  34%  22.2  11.1          50%    10.0% 
Galicia  5/7  60%  35.6  19.6  356.5  5.2  11.8  32.8  80%  4.4  80% 
Balearic Islands  3/5  62%  21.5  10.7  354.7  3.3  5.2  39.6  33%  4.7  66.6% 
La Rioja  1/1  100%  22.3  12.8  271.1  3.1  8.5  40.0  100%  3.1  100% 
Madrid  19/22  82%  31.8  8.2  227.7  8.1  14.3  47.4  56%  2.8  66.6% 
Navarre  3/3  100%  36.1  11.8  300.0  4.0  7.6  32.3  33%  3.1  66.6% 
Basque Country  6/6  87%  31.4  8.5  391.7  4.3  7.1  19.3  33%  7.2  50% 
Region of Murcia  3/5  67%  23.9  10.0  251.3  1.3  12.4  22.1  0%  2.9  100% 
Average      26.7  9.8  254.8  6.4  8.9  33.8  43%  4.2  65% 
Median      27.0  10.0  253.4  5.2  8.3  32.6  33%  4.0  67% 
SD      5.3  4.1  97.3  3.6  3.0  10.8  33%  1.4  31% 
Min.      19.4  3.3  60.7  1.3  4.9  18.7  0%  2.6  0% 
Max.      36.1  19.6  401.4  14.5  14.3  50.0  100%  7.2  100% 

DH, day hospital; SD, standard deviation; S-U_EyN, endocrinology and nutrition services and units.

a

Number of S-U_EyN that answered the survey out of the total universe selected.

b

% of the total population of the autonomous community in the catchment area of the hospitals' S-U_EyN that responded to the survey. Both indicators should be used to get closer to the reliability of the indicators.

c

Rate per 1,000,000 inhabitants.

d

Rate per 1,000 inhabitants and year; S-U_EyN attendances: calculated on the hospital discharges from the S-U_EyN.

e

As of 31/12/2020.

f

% of S-U_EyN with specifically assigned day hospital (DH) places.

g

Ratio of successive consultations:first consultations.

h

% of centres in each autonomous community that conduct nutritional assessment of hospitalised patients.

Discussion

The RECALSEEN 2021 survey provides relevant information on several aspects of the structure, resources and activities of the S-U_EyN. The most significant findings were as follows: (1) the notable inter-regional differences in provision of resources; (2) the significant interrelationship of the S-U_EyN with other departments and units in both primary and specialised care; (3) the remarkable impetus that the S-U_EyN have experienced regarding the prospect of the "hospital of the future"10: shifting processes to the outpatient setting and telemedicine; (4) the existing gap with the standards established by the SEEN; and (5) the acknowledgement of a long journey towards the implementation of good practices in the S-U_EyN.

There are notable inter-regional differences both in resources (endocrinologists per 1,000,000 inhabitants, assigned beds) and in the use of S-U_EyN (hospital admissions, outpatient consultations) (Table 5). The extent to which these differences may be associated with inequalities in health outcomes between health services in the autonomous communities should be investigated. Regarding the rate of endocrinologists, it should be noted that the estimate calculated through the RECALSEEN survey (2.5 per 100,000 inhabitants) tallies with the estimate from the Ministry of Health (2.6), which uses a different methodology.11

The concept of multidisciplinarity seems to be incorporated into the S-U_EyN. Practically all of the S-U_EyN have structured relationship systems with primary care, and 70% of the S-U_EyN have developed an interconsultation unit with other departments. Although progress should probably be made in the implementation of more structured interrelational models with other departments and with primary care, the role of endocrinology and nutrition in the provision of patient-focussed multidisciplinary care will probably be one of the challenges of future development.

The shift of endocrinological care to the outpatient setting is a trend in the S-U_EyN that was detected in the 2017 survey. The rate of hospital admissions in the S-U_EyN has decreased significantly throughout the period from 2007 to 2019, accompanied by a progressive decrease in length of hospital stay, in a context of admissions of progressively older or very elderly patients,12 with a notable increase in comorbidities, including diabetes and malnutrition.13,14 In the scenario of the "hospital of the future", the notable impetus that the S-U_EyN have given to the use of telemedicine in all its modalities is also noteworthy. The rate of remote consultations per 1,000 inhabitants per year was slightly higher in 2020 than the rate of first consultations, representing a six-fold increase on 2019 (Table 3). This can most probably be explained by adaptation to the healthcare overburden arising from the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, and is a trend that is likely to continue in the future. Developing quality "telemedicine", which involves the need to equip endocrinologists and the other healthcare professionals integrated in the S-U_EyN with digital skills, is probably going to be another future challenge for the specialty.15 In this sense, the development of instruments such as those created by the SEEN16 and other scientific-medical societies,17 shifting processes to the outpatient setting, multidisciplinarity and digitisation are just some of the relevant healthcare challenges for the immediate future.

In relation to the S-U_EyN portfolio of services, the information collected in the 2021 survey shows a considerable step forward compared to 2017. There are, however, meaningful gaps compared to the proposal prepared by the SEEN16 (Table 6). Where these gaps seem most significant is in the methodical performance of nutritional screening in hospitalised patients (13% in all patients; 42% in specific areas); the assignment of day hospitals to the S-U_EyN (47%), the day hospital having special relevance for diabetes; as well as in the provision of some specialist units, especially in more complex hospitals (500 or more beds). Adequate provision of resources for the S-U_EyN of referral centres (health or regional area) and, probably, the establishment of healthcare networks that integrate the units in centres of lower volume and complexity with the S-U_EyN of their referral centres18 are possible challenges that the S-U_EyN must face in the immediate future.

Table 6.

Full service portfolio vs. RECALSEEN survey (2020).

Service portfolioa  RECALSEEN surveyb 
Hospitalisation
Interconsultation  70% of the S-U_EyN have established an interconsultation unit 
Nutritional screening  62% of the S-U_EyN perform nutritional screening; 13% on all patients; 42% on all patients in specific areas (cancer, etc.) 
Day hospital  47% of S-U_EyN have specific day hospital places assigned 
Specialist consultations
Neuroendocrinology  42% of the S-U_EyN (65% in hospitals with ≥500 beds) 
Thyroid cancer  66% of the S-U_EyN (86% in hospitals with ≥500 beds) 
Thyroid nodule  63% of the S-U_EyN (81% in hospitals with ≥500 beds) 
Type 1 DM  64% of the S-U_EyN (74% in hospitals with ≥500 beds) 
DM and pregnancy  64% of the S-U_EyN (75% in hospitals with ≥500 beds) 
Complex type 2 DM  No RECALSEEN survey data 
Dyslipidaemia and vascular risk  33% of the S-U_EyN (46% in hospitals with ≥500 beds) 
Diabetic foot  38% of the S-U_EyN (47% in hospitals with ≥500 beds) 
Adrenal disorders  31% of the S-U_EyN (44% in hospitals with ≥500 beds) 
Calcium and bone disorders  14% of the S-U_EyN (19% in hospitals with ≥500 beds) 
Infertility  4% of the S-U_EyN (5% in hospitals with ≥500 beds) 
Adult metabolic disorders  13% of the S-U_EyN (25% in hospitals with ≥500 beds) 
Morbid obesity  69% of the S-U_EyN (91% in hospitals with ≥500 beds) 
Eating disorders  29% of the S-U_EyN (40% in hospitals with ≥500 beds) 
Gender identity  35% of the S-U_EyN (53% in hospitals with ≥500 beds) 
Home parenteral and enteral nutrition  79% of the S-U_EyN (88% in hospitals with ≥500 beds) 
Dysphagia  42% of the S-U_EyN (56% in hospitals with ≥500 beds) 
ALS  No RECALSEEN survey data 

S-U_EyN, endocrinology and nutrition services and units.

a

Source: Santamaría-Sandi et al.16

b

Blank answers were considered “No”.

The 2021 survey revealed no significant improvements in the implementation of good practices in the S-U_EyN compared to the 2017 survey, with still only a low proportion (39%) of S-U_EyN that have implemented process management for their most relevant processes, with considerable room for improvement in this area (38% in 2017).

The 2021 survey confirms the notable research activity of the S-U_EyN detected in 2017. Some 22% of the S-U_EyN had professionals dedicated to research versus 24% in 2017; 60% had active research projects versus 48% in 2017; 51% were involved in clinical trials versus 63% in 2017; and 67% had published at least one article in journals with an impact factor versus 59% in 2017.

Although falling outside the scope of this article, the information available from the RECALSEEN project could be used to analyse the possible association between the structure and activity of the S-U_EyN with health outcomes, and especially if the inequalities observed in health outcomes between autonomous communities19,20 are associated with differences in resources or activity.

Limitations

As with RECALSEEN 2017, the reliability of the estimates, which depend, among other factors, on the representativeness of the sample in each autonomous community and the types of centre and S-U_EyN, must be borne in mind. Given that the sample is large, however, it does not seem controversial to assert that the information gleaned from it is representative of the current situation of the S-U_EyN; although it cannot be defined as a statistically significant sample. As has been pointed out, the activity data from 2020 are surely influenced by the healthcare changes induced by the adaptation of hospitals to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Finally, although there are no statistically significant differences in the volume of S-U_EyN hospitals that responded to the survey in 2021 compared to 2017, the percentage of units that responded differs considerably, and not all the S-U_EyN that responded in 2017 did so in 2021, so the comparison of results between the two periods is merely an indication, without statistical comparisons being established.

Conclusions

The RECALSEEN 2021 survey provides relevant information on the resources and activity of the S-U_EyN. The data and information generated identify some of the most significant challenges for the specialty, the S-U_EyN and for the SEEN: the role of endocrinology and nutrition in providing patient-focussed multidisciplinary care; the development of quality "telemedicine"; adequate provision of resources for the S-U_EyN and the establishment of healthcare networks; the implementation of healthcare process management; and the reduction of possible inequalities in care for endocrine diseases and nutritional disorders between health centres and services.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A
Supplementary data

The following is Supplementary data to this article:

References
[1]
F. Botella-Romero, F.J. Elola Somoza, E. Navarro-González, C. Fernández-Pérez, J.L. Bernal-Sobrino, I.B. Lesmes.
RECALSEEN. La atención al paciente en las unidades de Endocrinología y Nutrición del Sistema Nacional de Salud.
Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr., 66 (2019), pp. 425-433
[2]
E. Cancer Minchot, F.J. Elola Somoza, C. Fernández Pérez, J.L. Bernal Sobrino, I. Bretón Lesmes, F. Botella Romero.
RECALSEEN. Subgrupo: la atención al paciente en las unidades de nutrición clínica del Sistema Nacional de Salud.
Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr, 68 (2021), pp. 354-362
[3]
Puig-Domingo, I. Bretón, I. Bernabeu, J.A. Gimeno, S. Azriel, F. Botella, et al.
Reflexión estratégica de la Sociedad Española de Endocrinología y Nutrición sobre el futuro de la especialidad en el periodo 2018-2022.
Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr, 66 (2019), pp. 654-662
[4]
Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physician charter.
Project of the ABIM Foundation, ACP–ASIM Foundation, and European Federation of InternalMedicine.
Eur J Intern Med, 136 (2002), pp. 243-246
[5]
T.G. Ferris, C. Vogeli, J. Marder, C.S. Sennett, E.G. Campbel.
Physician specialty societies and the development of physician performance measures.
HealthAffairs, 26 (2007), pp. 1712-1719
[6]
N. Batra, D. Betts, S. Davis.
The future of health.
[7]
E. Clark, S. Singhal, K. Weber.
The future of healthcare: Value creation through next-generation business models.
McKinsey&Company, (2021),
[8]
A. Cequier, H. Bueno, C. Macaya, V. Bertomeu, J.R. González-Juanatey, A. Íñiguez, et al.
Evolución de la asistencia cardiovascular en el Sistema Nacional de Salud en España. Datos del Proyecto RECALCAR 2011-2020.
[9]
Escalada J, Santamaría FJ, Lesmes I (Dir). RECALSEEN 2021. La atención al paciente en las unidades de Endocrinología y Nutrición del Sistema Nacional de Salud. [accessed 10 Ago 2022] Available from: https://www.seen.es/portal/documentos/registro-recalseen-2022.
[10]
R. Gómez-Huelgas, J. Díez-Manglano, J. Carretero-Gómez, R. Barba, X. Corbella, J. García Alegría, et al.
El hospital del futuro en 10 puntos.
Rev Clin Esp., 220 (2020), pp. 444-449
[11]
P. Barber, B. González-López-Valcárcel.
Informe Oferta-Necesidad de Especialistas Médicos 2021-2035. EcoSalud.
[12]
A. Zapatero-Gaviria, R. Barba-Martín, J. Canora Lebrato, C. Fernández-Pérez, R. Gómez-Huelgas, J.L. Bernal-Sobrino.
RECALMIN II. Ocho años de hospitalización en las Unidades de Medicina Interna (2007–2014). ¿Qué ha cambiado?.
[13]
J. Marco, R. Barba, A. Zapatero, P. Matía, S. Plaza, J.E. Losa, et al.
Prevalence of the notification of malnutrition in the departments of Internal Medicine and its prognostic implications.
Clin Nutr., 30 (2011), pp. 450-454
[14]
F. Botella Romero.
Abordaje integral del paciente desnutrido: buscando la continuidad en el apoyo nutricional.
NutrHosp., 35 (2018), pp. 34-39
[15]
Topol E (Chair). The Topol Review. An independent report on behalf of the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. February 2019. [accessed 16 Mar 2022]. Available from: https://topol.hee.nhs.uk/.
[16]
Santamaría-Sandi, E. Navarro-González, A. Herrero-Ruiz, O. Bandrés- Nivela, M. Ballesteros-Pomar, F.J. Escalada-San Martín, et al.
Cartera de servicios en Endocrinología y Nutrición. Actualización 2020.
Endocrinol Nutr., 68 (2021), pp. 577-588
[17]
J.J. Gorgojo-Martínez, A. Zugasti-Murillo, M.A. Rubio-Herrera, I. Bretón-Lesmes.
Teleconsulta en Endocrinología y Nutrición en tiempos de la pandemia COVID-19 y más allá.
[18]
V. Barrios, J. Cosín-Sales, M. Bravo, C. Escobar, J.M. Gámez, A. Huelmos, et al.
La consulta telemática para el cardiólogo clínico en tiempos de la COVID-19: presente y futuro. Documento de consenso de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología.
Rev Esp Cardiol, 73 (2020), pp. 910-918
[19]
E. Ferlie, S.M. Shortell.
Improving the quality of health care in the United Kingdom and the United States: a framework for change.
Milbank Q, 79 (2001), pp. 281-316
[20]
R. Reyes García, J.L. Bernal Sobrino, C. Fernandez Pérez, C. Morillas-Ariño, S. Azriel- Mira, F.J. Elola, et al.
Trends on Diabetes Mellitus’s healthcare management in Spain 2007–2015.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 156 (2019), pp. 107824

They have contributed equally to this work.

Copyright © 2023. SEEN and SED
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos