Información del artículo
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
S. Tanenbaum.
What physicians know.
N Engl J Med, 329 (1993), pp. 1268-1271
[2.]
J. Gérvas, M. Pérez Fernández.
El diseño semi-experimental y experimental y la investigación evaluativa.
Aten Primaria, 8 (1991), pp. 567-576
[3.]
B. Starfield.
Quality of care research. Internal elegance and external relevance.
JAMA, 280 (1998), pp. 1006-1008
[4.]
T. Gosden, F. Forland, I.S. Kristiansen, M. Sutton, B. Leese, A. Giuffrida, et al.
Impact of payment method on behaviour of primary care physicians: a systematic review.
J Health Serv Res, 6 (2001), pp. 44-55
[5.]
W.S. Harris, M. Gowda, J.W. Kolb, C.P. Strychacz, J.L. Vacek, P.G. Jones, et al.
A randomized, controlled trial of the effects of remote, intercessory prayer on outcomes in patients admited to the coronary care unit.
Arch Intern Med, 159 (1999), pp. 2273-2278
[6.]
Committee on the Conduct of Science.
On being a scientist.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 86 (1989), pp. 9053-9074
[7.]
C.D. Naylor.
Clinical decisions: from art to science and back again.
Lancet, 358 (2001), pp. 523-524
[8.]
G. Elwyn, A. Edwards, M. Eccles, D. Rovner.
Decision analysis in patient care.
Lancet, 358 (2001), pp. 571-574
[9.]
J. Gérvas, M. Pérez Fernández.
Las hiperlipemias y la prevención primaria de la cardiopatía isquémica.
Med Clín (Barc), 109 (1997), pp. 549-552
[10.]
T.A. Furukawa, D.L. Streiner, S. Hori.
Discrepancies among megatrials.
J Clin Epidemiol, 53 (2000), pp. 1193-1199
[11.]
A.L. Cochrane.
Eficacia y eficiencia. Reflexiones al azar sobre los servicios sanitarios.
[12.]
G.B. Hill.
Archie Cochrane and his legacy. An internal challange to physicians' autonomy.
J Clin Epidemiol, 53 (2000), pp. 1189-1192
[13.]
S. Barton.
Which clinical studies provide the best evidence?.
BMJ, 321 (2000), pp. 255-266
[14.]
N.A. Desbiens.
Lessons learned from attemps to establish the blind in placebo-controlled trials of zinc for the common cold.
Ann Intern Med, 133 (2000), pp. 302-303
[15.]
D.L. Sackett.
Why randomized controlled trial fail but needn't: 1.Failure to gain “coal-face” commitment and to use the uncertainty principle.
CMAJ, 162 (2000), pp. 1311-1314
[16.]
The ALLHAT Officers.
Mayor cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients randomized to diaxazosin versus chlortalidone. The Antihypertensive and Likpid Lowering Treatment to Prevent Haerth Attack Trial (ALLHAT).
JAMA, 283 (2000), pp. 1967-1975
[17.]
F.C. Taylor, H. Cohen, S. Ebrahim.
Systematic review of long term anticoagulant or antiplatelet treatment in patients with non-rheumatic atrial fibrilation.
BMJ, 322 (2001), pp. 321-326
[18.]
The Digitalis Investigators Group.
The effect of digoxin on mortality and morbidity in patients with heart disease.
N Engl J Med, 336 (1997), pp. 525-533
[19.]
B.F.Y.J. Uretsky, F.E. Shahidi, L.G. Yellen, M.C. Harrison, M.K. Jolly.
Randomized study assesing the effect of withdrawal in patients with mild to moderate chronic congestive heart failure: results of the PROVED trial.
J Am Coll Cardiol, 22 (1993), pp. 955-962
[20.]
R.P. Graham, P.A. James, T.M. Cowan.
Are clinical practice guidelines valid for primary care?.
J Clin Epidemiol, 53 (2000), pp. 949-954
[21.]
S. Hollis, F. Campbell.
What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials.
BMJ, 319 (1999), pp. 670-674
[22.]
F. Borrel.
Aforismos que me ayudan.
Jano, 61 (2001), pp. 34
[23.]
S.J. Pocock, D.R. Elbourne.
Randomised trials or observational tribulations?.
N Engl J Med, 342 (2000), pp. 1907-1909
[24.]
L. Palomo.
Ensayos clínicos en atención primaria, o la investigación a ras de suelo.
SEMERGEN, 27 (2001), pp. 466-468
Se presentó una versión previa de este texto en el 1er. Congreso de Atención Primaria de Castilla-León (SCLMFyC, SEMERGEN C/L), en Burgos, en marzo de 2001.
Copyright © 2002. Elsevier España, S.L. y Sociedad Española de Medicina Rural y Generalista (SEMERGEN)
