covid
Buscar en
Revista Clínica de Periodoncia, Implantología y Rehabilitación Oral
Toda la web
Inicio Revista Clínica de Periodoncia, Implantología y Rehabilitación Oral Influencia del tiempo de tratamiento de superficie con ácido fluorhídrico de l...
Información de la revista
Vol. 5. Núm. 3.
Páginas 117-121 (diciembre 2012)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 5. Núm. 3.
Páginas 117-121 (diciembre 2012)
Open Access
Influencia del tiempo de tratamiento de superficie con ácido fluorhídrico de la porcelana VITA VM 13 en la resistencia de unión a cemento de resina frente a fuerzas de tracción. Estudio in vitro
Influence of surface treatment time with hydrofluoric acid of VITA VM13 porcelain on tensile bond strength to a luting resin cement. In vitro study
Visitas
1609
J.P. Guzmán Thoms1,
Autor para correspondencia
jp.guzman.t@gmail.com

Correspondencia autor.
, H. González Bustamante2, M. Salgado Montoya2
1 Cirujano Dentista. Especialista en Rehabilitación Oral. Universidad San Sebastián. Chile
2 Profesores Asociados. Facultad de Odontología, Universidad San Sebastián, Sede Santiago. Chile
Este artículo ha recibido

Under a Creative Commons license
Información del artículo
Resumen
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Resumen
Introducción

Los procedimientos restauradores indirectos son comunes en la clínica diaria actual. Se debe tener cuidado especial en la cementación, pues la gran mayoría de los fracasos ocurren en la interfase diente/restauración. Por esto es indispensable un adecuado tratamiento de superficie de la restauración para lograr una adhesión óptima a la superficie dentaria.

Materiales y Métodos

Treinta cilindros de porcelana VITA VM 13 con dimensiones de 5mm de altura y 7mm de diámetro fueron separadas aleatoriamente en 3 grupos (n=10) de acuerdo con los tratamientos recibidos. Grupo I (control) - sin acondicionamiento superficial; Grupo II - grabado con ácido fluorhídrico al 9.6% por 1 minuto; Grupo III - grabado con ácido fluorhídrico al 9.6% por 2 minutos. Estas fueron probadas en cuanto a su resistencia de unión a la tracción en una máquina universal para pruebas (INSTRON modelo 4411, 3M). Los valores, expresados en MPa, fueron analizados estadísticamente a un nivel de significación del 5%, usando el Análisis de la Varianza (ANOVA) de un factor.

Resultados

En relación con la prueba de resistencia de unión a la tracción, se encontraron los siguientes valores medios para cada grupo: Grupo I (control) - x=3.35 MPa; Grupo II - x=4.64 MPa; Grupo III - x=3.80 MPa.

Conclusiones

Según los resultados obtenidos, se puede concluir que el tratamiento de superficie con ácido fluorhídrico durante 1 minuto, promueve microrretenciones que aumentan significativamente los valores de resistencia a la tracción, que puede traducirse en un beneficio clínico mayor.

Palabras clave:
Porcelana feldespática
resistencia de unión
acondicionamiento de superficie
grabado con ácido fluorhídrico
Abstract
Aim

Indirect restorative procedures are common in the current daily practice. Special care must be taken in the cement, as the vast majority of failures occurs at the interface tooth /restoration. Therefore a proper surface treatment of the restoration is essential to achieve optimum adhesion to the tooth surface.

Materials and Methods

Thirty porcelain cylinders VITA VM 13 with dimensions of 5mm in height and 7mm in diameter were randomly divided into 3 groups (n=10) according to the treatments received. Group I (control) - no surface conditioning; Group II- recorded with 9.6% hydrofluoric acid for 1 minute; Group III - recorded with 9.6% hydrofluoric acid for 2 minutes. Their tensile bond strength was tested in a universal testing machine (Instron Model 4411, 3M). The values, expressed in MPa, were statistically analyzed at a level of significance of 5%, using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) of a factor.

Results

In relation to the bond strength test, tensile strength, revealed the following values for each group: Group I (control) - x=3.35 MPa, Group II - x=4.64 MPa, Group III - x=3.80 MPa.

Conclusions

According to the results, it can be concluded that the surface treatment with hydrofluoric acid for 1 minute promotes microretentions, which significantly increase the values of bond strength, tensile strength. This can result in a higher clinical benefit.

Key words:
Feldspathic porcelain
bond strength
surface conditioning
hydrofluoric acid etching
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Referencias bibliográficas
[1.]
M. Saravia.
Adhesión a sustratos no dentarios.
Gilberto Henostroza. Operatoria Dental y Biomateriales 2000, 1ra, Multi-impresos, (2000),
[2.]
M. Saavedra.
Procedimientos clínicos para carillas.
Gilberto Henostroza. Operatoria Dental y Biomateriales 2000, 1ra, Multi-impresos, (2000),
[3.]
G.C. Cho, T.E. Donovan, W.W. Chee.
Clinical experiences with bonded porcelain laminate veneers.
J Calif Dent Assoc, 26 (1998), pp. 121-127
[4.]
H. Dumfahrt, H. Schaffer.
Porcelain laminate veneers. A retrospective evaluation after 1 to 10 years of service: Part II-clinical results.
Int J Prosthodont, 13 (2000), pp. 9-18
[5.]
M.J. Friedman.
Ask the experts: Porcelain veneers.
J Esthet Restor Dent, 13 (2001), pp. 86-87
[6.]
M. Fradeani.
Six-year follow-up with empress veneers.
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 18 (1998), pp. 216-225
[7.]
M. Peumans, B. Van Meerbeek, P. Lambrechts, G. Vanherle.
Porcelain veneers: A review of the literature.
J Dent, 28 (2000), pp. 163-177
[8.]
M.B. Blatz.
Long-term clinical success of all-ceramic posterior restorations.
Quintessence Int, 33 (2002), pp. 415-426
[9.]
A. Felden, G. Schmalz, M. Federlin, K.A. Hiller.
Retrospective clinical investigation and survival analysis on ceramic inlays and partial ceramic crowns: Results up to 7 years.
Clin Oral Investig, 2 (1998), pp. 161-167
[10.]
J.W. van Dijken, C. Hoglund-Aberg, A.L. Olofsson.
Fired ceramic inlays: A 6-year follow up.
J Dent, 26 (1998), pp. 219-225
[11.]
M. Hayashi, Y. Tsuchitani, M. Miura, F. Takeshige, S. Ebisu.
6-year clinical evaluation of fired ceramic inlays.
Oper Dent, 23 (1998), pp. 318-326
[12.]
M. Fuzzi, G. Rappelli.
Ceramic inlays: Clinical assessment and survival rate.
J Adhesive Dent, 1 (1999), pp. 71-79
[13.]
J.F. Roulet.
Longevity of glass ceramic inlays and amalgam-results up to 6 years.
Clin Oral Invest, 1 (1997), pp. 40-46
[14.]
W. Mormann, I. Krejci.
Computer-designed inlays after 5 years in situ: Clinical performance and scanning electron microscopic evaluation.
Quintessence Int, 23 (1992), pp. 109-115
[15.]
U. Pallesen.
Clinical evaluation of CAD/CAM ceramic restorations: 6-year report.
CAD/CIM in aesthetic dentistry: CEREC 10 year anniversary symposium, pp. 241-253
[16.]
N.G. Berg, T. Derand.
A 5-year evaluation of ceramic inlays (CEREC).
Swed Dent J, 21 (1997), pp. 121-127
[17.]
G. Sjogren, M. Molin, J.W. van Dijken.
A 5-year clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays (Cerec) cemented with a dual-cured or chemically cured resin composite luting agent.
Acta Odontol Scand, 56 (1998), pp. 263-267
[18.]
O. el-Mowafy, M.H. Rubo.
Resin-bonded fixed partial dentures-a literature review with presentation of a novel approach.
Int J Prosthodont, 13 (2000), pp. 460-467
[19.]
G. Corrente, L. Vergnano, S. Re, D. Cardaropoli, R. Abundo.
Resin-bonded fixed partial dentures and splints in periodontally compromised patients: A 10-year followup.
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 20 (2000), pp. 628-636
[20.]
M. Behr, A. Leibrock, W. Stich, P. Rammelsberg, M. Rosentritt, G. Handel.
Adhesive-fixed partial dentures in anterior and posterior areas: Results ofan ongoing prospective study begun in 1985.
Clin Oral Investig, 2 (1998), pp. 31-35
[21.]
M. Kern, J.R. Strub.
Bonding to alumina ceramic in restorative dentistry: Clinical results over up to 5 years.
J Dent, 26 (1998), pp. 245-249
[22.]
K.A. Malament, S.S. Socransky.
Survival of Dicor glass-ceramic dental restorations over 14 years: Part I: Survival of Dicor complete coverage restorations and effect of internal surface acid etching, tooth position, gender, and age.
J Prosthet Dent, 81 (1999), pp. 23-32
[23.]
K.A. Malament, S.S. Socransky.
Survival of Dicor glass-ceramic dental restorations over 14 years. Part II: Effect of thickness of Dicor material and design of tooth preparation.
J Prosthet Dent, 81 (1999), pp. 662-667
[24.]
K.A. Malament, S.S. Socransky.
Survival of Dicor glass-ceramic dental restorations over 16 years. Part III: Effect of luting agent and tooth or tooth-substitute core structure.
J Prosthet Dent, 86 (2001), pp. 511-519
[25.]
T. Hooshmand, S. Parvizi, A. Keshvad.
Effect of surface acid etching on the biaxial flexural strength of two hot-pressed glass ceramics.
J Prosthodont, 17 (2008), pp. 415-419
[26.]
J.H. Chen, H. Matsumura, M. Atsuta.
Effect of etchant, etching period, and silane priming on bond strength to porcelain of composite resin.
Oper Dent, 23 (1998), pp. 250-257
[27.]
J.H. Chen, H. Matsumura, M. Atsuta.
Effect of different etching periods on the bond strength of a composite resin to a machinable porcelain.
J Dent, 26 (1998), pp. 53-58
[28.]
V. Jardel, M. Degrange, B. Picard, G. Derrien.
Surface energy of etched ceramic.
Int J Prosthodont, 12 (1999), pp. 415-418
[29.]
T.W. Yen, R.B. Blackman, R.J. Baez.
Effect of acid etching on the flexural strength of a feldspathic porcelain and a castable glass ceramic.
J Prosthet Dent, 70 (1993), pp. 224-233
[30.]
O. Addison, P.M. Marquis, G.J. Fleming.
The impact of hydrofluoric acid surface treatments on the performance of a porcelain laminate restorative material.
Dent Mater, 23 (2007), pp. 461-468
[31.]
J.C. Chang, D.A. Hart, A.W. Estey, J.T. Chan.
Tensile bond strenghts of five luting agents to two CAD-CAM restorative materials and enamel.
J Prosthet Dent, 90 (2003), pp. 18-23
[32.]
O. el-Mowafy.
The use of resin cements in restorative dentistry to overcome retention problems.
J Can Dent Assoc, 67 (2001), pp. 97-102
[33.]
J.A. Sorensen, S.K. Kang, S.P. Avera.
Porcelain-composite interface microleakagewith various porcelain surface treatments.
Dent Mat, 7 (1991), pp. 118-123
[34.]
M.E. Jensen, J.J. Sheth, D. Tolliver.
Etched-porcelain resin-bonded fullveneer crowns: In vitro fracture resistance.
Compendium, 10 (1989), pp. 336-338
[35.]
J.W. McLean, T.H. Hughes.
The reinforcement of dental porcelain with ceramic oxides.
Br Dent J, 119 (1965), pp. 251-267
[36.]
R.R. Seghi, J.A. Sorensen.
Relative flexural strength of six new ceramic materials.
Int J Prosthodont, 8 (1995), pp. 239-246
[37.]
M. Andersson, A. Oden.
A new all-ceramic crown: A dense-sintered, high-purity alumina coping with porcelain.
Acta Odontol Scand, 51 (1993), pp. 59-64
[38.]
K. Zeng, A. Oden, D. Rowcliffe.
Flexure tests on dental ceramics.
Int J Prosthodont, 9 (1996), pp. 434-439
[39.]
K. Zeng, A. Oden, D. Rowcliffe.
Evaluation of mechanical properties of dental ceramic core materials in combination with porcelains.
Int J Prosthodont, 11 (1998), pp. 183-189
[40.]
M. Ashizuka, H. Kiyohara, T. Okuno, Y. Kubota.
Fatigue behavior oftetragonal zirconia polycrystals (Y-TZP) containing 2 and 4 mol% Y2O3 (Part 2).
J Ceram Soc Jpn Inter Ed, 96 (1988), pp. 731-736
[41.]
M. Taira, Y. Nomura, K. Wakasa, M. Yamaki, A. Matsui.
Studies on fracture toughness of dental ceramics.
J Oral Rehabil, 17 (1990), pp. 551-563
[42.]
R.A. Giordano 2nd, L. Pelletier, S. Campbell, R. Pober.
Flexural strength of an infused ceramic, glass ceramic, and feldspathic porcelain.
J Prosthet Dent, 73 (1995), pp. 411-418
[43.]
I. Stangel, D. Nathanson, C.S. Hsu.
Shear strength of the composite bond to etched porcelain.
J Dent Res, 66 (1987), pp. 1460-1465
[44.]
G.C. Paffenbarger, W.T. Sweeney, R.L. Bowen.
Bonding porcelain teeth to acrylic resin denture bases.
J Am Dent Assoc, 74 (1967), pp. 1018-1023
[45.]
R. Newburg, C.H. Pameijer.
Composite resins bonded to porcelain with silane solution.
J Am Dent Assoc, 96 (1978), pp. 288-291
[46.]
M. Kern, M.J. Neikes, J.R. Strub.
Tensile strength of the bond to In-Ceram after varying modes of surface conditioning.
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z, 46 (1991), pp. 758-761
[47.]
M. Kern, V.P. Thompson.
Sandblasting and silica coating of a glassinfiltrated alumina ceramic: Volume loss, morphology and changes in surface composition.
J Prosthet Dent, 71 (1994), pp. 453-461
[48.]
J.F. Roulet, K.J.M. Soderholm, J. Longmate.
Efect of treatment and storage conditions on ceramic/composite bond strenght.
J Dent Res, 74 (1995), pp. 381-387
[49.]
R. van Noort.
Introduction to Dental Materials.
Mosby, (1994),
[50.]
H. Meiners, R. Herrmann, S. Spitzbarth.
ZurVerbundfestigkeitdesRocatec- Systems.
Dental Labor, 38 (1990), pp. 185-188
[51.]
K.B. May, J. Fox, M.E. Razzoog, B.R. Lang.
Silane to enhance the bond between polymethyl methacrylate and titanium.
J Prosthet Dent, 73 (1995), pp. 428-431
[52.]
G.P. Stewart, P. Jain, J. Hodges.
Shear bond strength of resin cements to both ceramic and dentin.
J Prosthet Dent, 88 (2002), pp. 277-284
[53.]
K. Klosa, S. Wolfart, F. Lehmann, H.J. Wenz, M. Kern.
The effect of storage conditions, contamination modes and cleaning procedures on the resin bond strength to lithium disilicate ceramic.
J Adhes Dent, 11 (2009), pp. 127-135
[54.]
S. Canay, N. Hersek, A. Ertan.
Effect of different acid treatments on a porcelain surface.
J Oral Rehabil, 28 (2001), pp. 95-101
[55.]
A. Della Bona, K.J. Anusavice, J.A. Hood.
Effect of ceramic surface treatment on tensile bond strength to a resin cement.
Int J Prosthodont, 15 (2002), pp. 248-255
[56.]
A.U. Guler, F. Yilmaz, M. Yenisey, E. Guler, C. Ural.
Effect of acidetching time and a self-etching adhesive on the shear bond strength of composite resin to porcelain.
J Adhes Dent, 8 (2006), pp. 21-25
[57.]
A. Della Bona, R. Van Noort.
Shear vs. tensile bond strength of resin composite bonded to ceramic.
J Dent Res, 74 (1995), pp. 1591-1596
[58.]
O. Addison, G.J. Fleming.
The influence of cement lute, thermocycling and surface preparation on the strength of aporcelain laminate veneering material.
Dent Mater, 20 (2004), pp. 286-292
[59.]
A. Della Bona, K.J. Anusavice.
Microstructure, composition, and etching topography of dental ceramics.
Int J Prosthodont, 15 (2002), pp. 159-167
[60.]
Y. Chaiyabutr, S. McGowan, K.M. Phillips, J.C. Kois, R.A. Giordano.
The effect of hydrofluoric acid surface treatment and bond strength of a zirconia veneering ceramic.
J Prosthet Dent, 100 (2008), pp. 194-202
[61.]
L.Z. Naves, C.J. Soares, R.R. Moraes, L.S. Gonçalves, M.A. Sinhoreti, L. Correr- Sobrinho.
Surface/interface morphology and bond strength to glass ceramic etched for different periods.
Oper Dent, 35 (2010), pp. 420-427
[62.]
D.M. Wolf, J.M. Powers, K.L. O’Keefe.
Bond strength of composite to etched and sandblasted porcelain.
Am J Dent, 6 (1993), pp. 155-158
[63.]
A. Della Bona, R. van Noort.
Ceramic surface preparations for resin bonding.
Am J Dent, 11 (1998), pp. 276-280
[64.]
I. Stangel, D. Nathanson, C.S. Hsu.
Shear strength of the composite bond to etched porcelain.
J Dent Res, 66 (1987), pp. 1460-1465
[65.]
D.M. Wolf, J.M. Powers, K.L. O’Keefe.
Bond strength of composite to etched and sandblasted porcelain.
Am J Dent, 6 (1993), pp. 155-158
Copyright © 2012. Sociedad de Periodoncia de Chile, Sociedad de Implantología Oral de Chile y Sociedad de Prótesis y Rehabilitación Oral de Chile
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo