metricas
covid
Buscar en
Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología
Toda la web
Inicio Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología Resultados del tratamiento conservador de las fracturas de cotilo
Información de la revista
Vol. 50. Núm. 2.
Páginas 111-116 (enero 2005)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 50. Núm. 2.
Páginas 111-116 (enero 2005)
Acceso a texto completo
Resultados del tratamiento conservador de las fracturas de cotilo
Results of the conservative treatment of acetabular fractures
Visitas
7998
R. Fernández-Fernández*, A. Foruria de Diego, M. Peleteiro-Pensado, E. Gil-Garay
Servicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología. Hospital Universitario La Paz. Madrid.
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Objetivos

Estudiar la evolución de pacientes con fracturas de cotilo tratadas de forma conservadora.

Material y método

Se recogieron de forma consecutiva 37 casos de fracturas de cotilo, tratados de forma conservadora con un seguimiento mínimo de 5 años. Las fracturas se trataron con reposo en cama y tracción seguido de un período de descarga y otro de carga parcial. Los pacientes se valoraron clínica y radiográficamente. El tipo de tratamiento fue evaluado según la tracción empleada, el tiempo de descarga y de carga parcial. Se evaluó el grado de desplazamiento y su relación con la evolución posterior.

Resultados

Veinte fracturas no presentaron desplazamiento, 8 un desplazamiento entre 2-5 mm y en 9 casos fue superior a 5 mm. Al final del seguimiento 8 pacientes presentaron dolor, 15 movilidad limitada y 8 signos radiográficos de artrosis. El grado de desplazamiento se correlacionó con el resultado final.

Conclusiones

El tratamiento conservador puede ser una indicación en las fracturas de cotilo cuando el estado del paciente, el tipo de fractura o la calidad de hueso no permitan una osteosíntesis.

Palabras clave:
fracturas
cotilo
tratamiento conservador
Purpose

To study the evolution of patients with acetabular fractures treated conservatively

Material and methods

A series of 37 consecutive cases treated conservatively was analyzed. The minimum follow-up was 5 years. Fractures were treated with bed rest and traction, which were followed by a non weight-bearing period and a partial weight period. Patients were clinically and radiographically assessed. The different kinds of treatment were evaluated on the basis of the type of traction used, the length of the non weight-bearing period and the duration of the partial weight bearing one. The degree of displacement was also considered, in particular as it related with the patients’ subsequent evolution.

Results

Twenty fractures did not undergo any sort of displacement, 8 had a displacement of 2-5 mm, with 9 cases having a displacement higher than a 5 mm. At the end of follow-up, 8 patients experienced pain, 15 limited mobility and 8 had radiographic signs of osteoarthritis. The degree of displacement was correlated with the final result obtained.

Conclusions

Conservative treatment can be an appropriate indication for acetabular fractures when the patient’s condition, the type of fracture or bone quality advise against performing an osteosynthetic procedure.

Key words:
fractures
acetabulum
conservative treatment
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
C.R. Rowe, J.D. Lowell.
Prognosis of fractures of the acetabulum.
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 43 (1961), pp. 30-59
[2.]
E. Letournel.
Acetabulum fractures: classification and management.
Clin Orthop, 151 (1980), pp. 81-106
[3.]
J.P. Stannard, J.E. Alonso.
Controversies in acetabular fractures.
Clin Orthop, 353 (1998), pp. 74-80
[4.]
A.S. Kebaish, A. Roy, W. Rennie.
Displaced acetabular fractures: long-term follow-up.
J Trauma, 31 (1991), pp. 1539-1542
[5.]
M. Heeg, H.J. Klasen, J.D. Visser.
Operative treatment for acetabular fractures.
J Bone Joint Surg Br, 72 (1990), pp. 383-386
[6.]
R.N. Brueton.
A review of 40 acetabular fractures: the importance of early surgery.
Injury, 24 (1993), pp. 171-174
[7.]
F.Y. Chiu, C.M. Chen, W.H. Lo.
Surgical treatment of displaced acetabular fractures 72 cases followed for 10 (6-14) years.
Injury, 31 (2000), pp. 181-185
[8.]
M. Heeg, N. Otter, H.J. Klasen.
Anterior column fractures of the acetabulum.
J Bone Joint Surg Br, 74 (1992), pp. 554-557
[9.]
B.R. Moed, S.E. WilsonCarr, J.T. Watson.
Results of operative treatment of fractures of the posterior wall of the acetabulum.
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 84 (2002), pp. 752-758
[10.]
J.M. Matta.
Fractures of the acetabulum accuracy of reduction and clinical results in patients managed operatively within three weeks after the injury.
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 78A (1996),
[11.]
P.D. Ruesch, H. Holdener, M. Ciaramitaro, J.W. Mast.
A prospective study of surgically treated acetabular fractures.
Clin Orthop, 305 (1994), pp. 38-46
[12.]
R. Wright, K. Barrett, M.J. Christie, K.D. Johnson.
Acetabular fractures: long term follow-up of open reduction and internal fixation.
J Orthop Trauma, 8 (1994), pp. 397-403
[13.]
V.A. Ridder, S. Lange, L. Kingma, M. Hogervorst.
Results of 75 consecutive patients with an acetabular fracture.
Clin Orthop, 305 (1994), pp. 53-57
[14.]
K.A. Mayo, E. Letournel, J.M. Matta, E.E. Johnson, C.L. Martimbeau.
Surgical revision of malreduced acetabular fractures.
Clin Orthop, 305 (1994), pp. 47-52
[15.]
M. Oransky, C. Sanguinetti.
Surgical treatment of displaced acetabular fractures: results of 50 consecutives cases.
J Orthop Trauma, 7 (1993), pp. 28-32
[16.]
M. Liebergall, R. Mosheiff, J. Low, M. Goldvirt, Y. Matan, D. Segal.
Acetabular fractures Clinical outcome of surgical treatment.
Clin Orthop, 366 (1999), pp. 205-216
[17.]
G. Fica, M. Cordova, L. Guzmán, D. Schweitzer.
Open reduction and internal fixation of acetabular fractures.
Int Orthop, 22 (1998), pp. 348-351
[18.]
K.A. Mayo.
Open reduction and internal fixation of fractures of the acetabulum Results in 163 fractures.
Clin Orthop, 305 (1994), pp. 31-37
[19.]
D.L. Helfet, J. Borrelli Jr., T. DiPascuales, R. Sanders.
Stabilization of acetabular fractures in elderly patients.
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 74 (1992), pp. 753-765
[20.]
E.E. Johnson, R.M. Kay, F.J. Dorey.
Heterotopic ossification prophylaxis following operative treatment of acetabular fracture.
Clin Orthop, 305 (1994), pp. 88-95
[21.]
P. Tornetta.
Non-operative management of acetabular fractures. The use of dynamic stress views.
J Bone Joint Surg Br, 81 (1999), pp. 67-70
[22.]
M.L. Jiménez, M. Tile, R.S. Schenk.
Total hip replacement after acetabular fracture.
Orthop Clin North Am, 28 (1997), pp. 435-446
[23.]
T. Harnroongroj.
The role of the anterior column of the acetabulum on pelvic stability: a biomechanical study.
Injury, 29 (1998), pp. 293-296
[24.]
S.A. Olson, B.K. Bay, A.N. Pollak, N.A. Sharkey, T. Lee.
The effect of variable size posterior wall acetabular fractures on contact characteristics of the hip joint.
J Orthop Thauma, 10 (1996), pp. 395-402
Copyright © 2006. Sociedad Española de Cirugia Ortopédica y Traumatología (SECOT)
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos