metricas
covid
Buscar en
Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología (English Edition)
Toda la web
Inicio Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología (English Edition) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Results of treatment with hybrid posterior inst...
Información de la revista
Vol. 53. Núm. 3.
Páginas 173-184 (mayo - junio 2009)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 53. Núm. 3.
Páginas 173-184 (mayo - junio 2009)
Original papers
Acceso a texto completo
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Results of treatment with hybrid posterior instrumentation
Resultados del tratamiento de la escoliosis idiopática del adolescente mediante instrumentación posterior híbrida
Visitas
1546
R. Navarro-Navarroa,
Autor para correspondencia
Ricnavarro2@yahoo.es

Corresponding author.
, F. Martín-Garcíaa, A. Chirino-Cabreraa, J.P. Rodríguez-Álvareza, R. Santana-Suáreza, J. Molina-Cabrillanab, R. Navarro-Garcíaa
a Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Gran Canaria University Hospital, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
b Department of Preventive Medicine, Gran Canaria University Hospital, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Resumen
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Abstract
Purpose

Report on the clinical and radiological results obtained by surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis by means of hybrid posterior instrumentation. The repercussions of surgery on the patients’ quality of life are also described.

Materials and methods

Retrospective study of 26 patients operated between 2001 and 2006, with a mean follow-up of 37.8 months. In terms of the Lenke classification, 42.3% of patients had type 1 curves, 46.2% type 3 curves, 7.7% type 5 curves, and one case of type VI curves. All patients were subjected to a hybrid posterior instrumentation with distal pedicular screws and proximal hooks. Transfusion needs and complications were duly recorded. A clinical assessment was performed by means of the SRS-22 questionnaire. A radiological assessment was conducted preoperatively, postoperatively and at the end of follow-up.

Results

There were three superficial infections, one hemothorax and one hook dislocation. The administration of the SRS-22 questionnaire produced the following mean scores: 4.41 for pain, 4.39 for activity, 3.91 for self-image, 3.98 for mental health and 3.81 for satisfaction. Mean post-surgical radiological correction for thoracic and lumbar curves was 58% and 60%, respectively, with a mean loss of 7 and 5.5 degrees at the end of follow-up. There were no cases of pseudarthrosis.

Discussion and conclusions

Hybrid posterior instrumentation and fusion is an efficient and safe technique, with a low rate of pseudoarthrosis and failure. Results were good as regards pain and activity, but fair in terms of self-image and personal satisfaction. We found no statistically significant association between the patients’ age, the degree of curve correction and the score on the SRS-22 questionnaire.

Keywords:
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
Hybrid posterior instrumentation
SRS-22 questionnaire
Resumen
Objetivos

Describir los resultados clínicos y radiológicos así como la repercusión en la calidad de vida del enfermo tras el tratamiento quirúrgico de la escoliosis idiopática del adolescente mediante instrumentación posterior híbrida.

Material y método

Estudio retrospectivo de 26 sujetos intervenidos desde 2001 hasta 2006, con un seguimiento medio de 37,8 meses. Se obtuvieron, mediante la clasificación de Lenke de las curvas, los siguientes resultados: el 42,3% fue de tipo I, el 46,2% fue de tipo III, el 7,7% fue de tipo V y 3,8% fue de tipo VI. Se intervino a todos los sujetos mediante instrumentación posterior híbrida con tornillos pediculares distales y ganchos proximales. Se registraron las necesidades transfusionales y las complicaciones. Se realizó una evaluación clínica mediante el cuestionario SRS-22 (Scoliosis Research Society ‘Sociedad de Investigación de la Escoliosis’). Asimismo, se realizó una evaluación radiológica prequirúrgica, posquirúrgica inmediata y al final del seguimiento.

Resultados

Se registraron 3 infecciones superficiales, un hemotórax y una luxación de gancho. Mediante el cuestionario SRS-22 se obtuvieron las siguientes puntuaciones medias: 4,41 en dolor; 4,39 en actividad; 3,91 en autoimagen; 3,98 en salud mental, y 3,81 en satisfacción. La corrección radiológica media posquirúrgica en las curvas torácicas fue del 58% y en las curvas lumbares fue del 60%, con una pérdida media de 5,51 a 71 al final del seguimiento. No hubo casos de seudoartrosis.

Discusión y conclusiones

La instrumentación y fusión posterior híbrida es una técnica eficaz y segura, con bajo índice de seudoartrosis y fracasos. Los resultados fueron buenos en cuanto al dolor y a la actividad, pero fueron discretos en cuanto a la autoimagen y a la satisfacción personal. No se encontró asociación estadísticamente significativa entre la edad de los sujetos, el grado de corrección de la curva y la puntuación del cuestionario SRS-22.

Palabras clave:
Escoliosis idiopática del adolescente
Instrumentación posterior híbrida
Cuestionario SRS-22
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
References
[1.]
Y.J. Kim, L.G. Lenke, K.H. Bridwell, Y.S. Cho, K.D. Riew.
Free hand pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine: Is it safe?.
Spine, 29 (2004), pp. 333-342
[2.]
P. Harrington, J. Dickson.
An eleven-year clinical investigation of Harrington instrumentation: A preliminary report of 578 cases.
Clin Orthop, 93 (1973), pp. 113-130
[3.]
T. Humke, D. Grob, H. Scheier, H. Siegrist.
Cotrell-Dubousset and Harrington instrumentation in idiopathic scoliosis: A comparison of long-term results.
Eur Spine J, 4 (1995), pp. 280-283
[4.]
R.D. Fitch, M. Turi, B.E. Bowman, W.T. Hardaker.
Comparison of Cotrell-Dubousset and Harrington rod instrumentations in idiopathic scoliosis.
Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics, 10 (1990), pp. 44-47
[5.]
U. Liljenqvist, U. Lepsien, L. Hackenberg, T. Niemeyer, H. Halm.
Comparative analysis of pedicle screw and hook instrumentation in posterior correction and fusion of idiopathic thoracic scoliosis.
Eur Spine J, 11 (2002), pp. 336-343
[6.]
V. Remes, I. Helenius, D. Schlenzka, T. Yrjonen, M. Ylikoski, M. Poussa.
Cotrell-Dubousset (CD) or Universal Spine System (USS) instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS): Comparison of midterm clinical, functional, and radiologic outcomes.
Spine, 29 (2004), pp. 2024-2030
[7.]
Y.J. Kim, L.G. Lenke, J. Kim, K.H. Bridwell, S.K. Cho, G. Cheh.
Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
[8.]
T.R. Kuklo, B.K. Potter, L.G. Lenke, D.W. Polly, B. Sides, K.H. Bridwell.
Surgical revision rates of hooks versus hybrid versus screws versus combined anteroposterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
[9.]
J.M. Climent, J. Bago, A. Ey, F.J. Perez-Grueso, E. Izquierdo.
Validity of the spanish version of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) patient questionnaire.
Spine, 30 (2005), pp. 705-709
[10.]
R. Padua, S. Padua, L. Aulisa, E. Ceccarelli, L. Padua, E. Romanini.
Patient outcomes after Harrington instrumentation for idiopathic scoliosis: A 15- to 28-year evaluation.
Spine, 26 (2001), pp. 1268-1273
[11.]
M. Asher, S. Min Lai, D. Burton, B. Manna.
Discrimination validity of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 patient questionnaire: Relationship to idiopathic scoliosis curve pattern and curve size.
[12.]
L.P. D’Andrea, R.R. Betz, L.G. Lenke, D.H. Clements, T.G. Lowe, A. Merola.
Do radiographic parameters correlate with clinical outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?.
Spine, 25 (2000), pp. 1795-1802
[13.]
A.J. Danielsson.
What impact does spinal deformity correction for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis make on quality of life?.
[14.]
M. Tones, N. Moss, D.W. Polly.
A review of quality of life and psychosocial issues in scoliosis.
[15.]
H.A. King, J.H. Moe, D.S. Bradford, R.B. Winter.
The selection of fusion levels in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 65 (1983), pp. 1302-1313
[16.]
L.G. Lenke, R.R. Betz, J. Harms, K.H. Bridwell, D.H. Clements, T.G. Lowe.
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 83-A (2001), pp. 1169-1181
[17.]
L.G. Lenke, K.H. Bridwell, K. Blanke, C. Baldus, J. Weston.
Radiographic results of arthrodesis with Cotrell-Dubousset instrumentation for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A five to ten-year follow-up study.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 80 (1998), pp. 807-814
[18.]
E. Nash, J.H. Moe.
A study of vertebral rotation.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 51A (1969), pp. 223-229
[19.]
L. Pérez-Millán, I. Martínez-Garrido, A. López-Sánchez, I. Escrivá.
Comparación de los resultados mediante técnica segmentaria con barra única y barra de apoyo a única en el tratamiento quirúrgico de la escoliosis idiopática.
Rev Ortop Traumat, 47 (2003), pp. 336-342
[20.]
G.L. Farber, H.M. Place, R.A. Mazur, D.E. Jones, T.R. Damiano.
Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in lumbar fusions by plain radiographs and computed tomography.
Spine, 20 (1995), pp. 1494-1499
[21.]
H. Halm, T. Niemeyer, T. Link, U. Liljenqvist.
Segmental pedicle screw instrumentation in idiopathic thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliosis.
Eur Spine J, 9 (2000), pp. 191-197
[22.]
C.L. Hamill, L.G. Lenke, K.H. Bridwell, M.P. Chapman, K. Blanke, C. Baldus.
The use of pedicle screw fixation to improve correction in the lumbar spine of patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Is it warranted?.
Spine, 21 (1996), pp. 1241-1249
[23.]
M. Asher, S. Min Lai, D. Burton, B. Manna.
Scoliosis Research Society-22 patient questionnaire: Responsiveness to change associated with surgical treatment.
[24.]
J. Bago, J.M. Climent, A. Ey, F.J. Pérez-Grueso, E. Izquierdo.
The spanish version of the SRS-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis: Transcultural adaptation and reliability analysis.
Spine, 29 (2004), pp. 1676-1680
[25.]
J. Bago, J.M. Climent, A. Ey, F.J. Pérez-Grueso, E. Izquierdo, J. Bago, J.M. Climent, A. Ey, F.J. Perez-Grueso, E. Izquierdo, M.A. Re: Asher, S.M. Lai, R.C. Glattes, et al.
Refinement of the SRS-22 questionnaire function domain.
[26.]
M.A. Asher, S.M. Lai, R.C. Glattes, D.C. Burton, A. Alanay, J. Bago.
Refinement of the SRS-22 health-related quality of life questionnaire function domain.
[27.]
M. Asher, S.M. Lai, D. Burton, B. Manna, A. Cooper.
Safety and efficacy of Isola instrumentation and arthrodesis for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Two- to 12-year follow-up.
Spine, 29 (2004), pp. 2013-2023
[28.]
M.B. Dobbs, L.G. Lenke, Y.J. Kim, G. Kamath, M.W. Peelle, K.H. Bridwell.
Selective posterior thoracic fusions for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Comparison of hooks versus pedicle screws.
[29.]
H.L. Shufflebarger, M.J. Geck, C.E. Clark.
The posterior approach for lumbar and thoracolumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Posterior shortening and pedicle screws.
Spine, 29 (2004), pp. 269-276
[30.]
S.K. Storer, M.G. Vitale, J.E. Hyman, F.Y. Lee, J.C. Choe, D.P. Roye.
Correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using thoracic pedicle screw fixation versus hook constructs.
Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics, 25 (2005), pp. 415-419
[31.]
S.I. Suk, C.K. Lee, W.J. Kim, Y.J. Chung, Y.B. Park.
Segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis.
Spine, 20 (1995), pp. 1399-1405
[32.]
V. Vora, A. Crawford, N. Babekhir, O. Boachie-Adjei, L. Lenke, M. Peskin.
A pedicle screw construct gives an enhanced posterior correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis when compared with other constructs: Myth or reality.
[33.]
J.E. Lowenstein, H. Matsumoto, M.G. Vitale, M. Weidenbaum, J.A. Gomez, F.Y. Lee.
Coronal and sagittal plane correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A comparison between all pedicle screw versus hybrid thoracic hook lumbar screw constructs.
[34.]
H.W. Albers, M.T. Hresko, J. Carlson, J.E. Hall.
Comparison of single- and dual-rod techniques for posterior spinal instrumentation in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Spine, 25 (2000), pp. 1944-1949
[35.]
O. Karatoprak, K. Unay, M. Tezer, C. Ozturk, M. Aydogan, C. Mirzanli.
Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery.
International Orthopaedics, (2007), pp. 1944-1949
[36.]
H.D. Been, C.J. Kalkman, H.S. Traast, B.W. Ongerboer de Visser.
Neurologic injury after insertion of laminar hooks during Cotrell-Dubousset instrumentation.
Spine, 19 (1994), pp. 1402-1405
[37.]
M. Rittmeister, K. Leyendecker, A. Kurth, E. Schmitt.
Cauda equina compression due to a laminar hook: A late complication of posterior instrumentation in scoliosis surgery.
Eur Spine J, 8 (1999), pp. 417-420
[38.]
S.D. Gertzbein, S.E. Robbins.
Accuracy of pedicular screw placement in vivo.
[39.]
N.A. Ebraheim, G. Jabaly, R. Xu, R.A. Yeasting.
Anatomic relations of the thoracic pedicle to the adjacent neural structures.
Spine, 22 (1997), pp. 1553-1556
[40.]
J. Bago, M. Ramírez, F. Pellise, C. Villanueva.
Survivorship analysis of Cotrell-Dubousset instrumentation in idiopathic scoliosis.
Eur Spine J, 12 (2003), pp. 435-439
[41.]
K. Watanabe, K. Hasegawa, T. Hirano, S. Uchiyama, N. Endo.
Evaluation of postoperative residual spinal deformity and patient outcome in idiopathic scoliosis patients in Japan using the Scoliosis Research Society outcomes instrument.
[42.]
K. Watanabe, L.G. Lenke, K.H. Bridwell, K. Hasegawa, T. Hirano, N. Endo.
Cross-cultural comparison of the Scoliosis Research Society outcomes instrument between american and japanese idiopathic scoliosis patients: Are there differences?.
[43.]
M. Asher, S. Min Lai, D. Burton, B. Manna.
The reliability and concurrent validity of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis.
[44.]
S.M. Lai, M. Asher, D. Burton.
Estimating SRS-22 quality of life measures with SF-36: Application in idiopathic scoliosis.
Copyright © 2009. Sociedad Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología (SECOT). All rights reserved
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos