metricas
covid
Buscar en
Revista Iberoamericana de Micología
Toda la web
Inicio Revista Iberoamericana de Micología Molecular identification of Botrytis cinerea, Botrytis paeoniae and Botrytis pse...
Información de la revista
Vol. 33. Núm. 1.
Páginas 43-47 (enero - marzo 2016)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Visitas
7010
Vol. 33. Núm. 1.
Páginas 43-47 (enero - marzo 2016)
Note
Acceso a texto completo
Molecular identification of Botrytis cinerea, Botrytis paeoniae and Botrytis pseudocinerea associated with gray mould disease in peonies (Paeonia lactiflora Pall.) in Southern Chile
Identificación molecular de Botrytis cinerea, Botrytis paeoniae y Botrytis pseudocinerea asociadas a la pudrición gris de peonías (Paeonia lactiflora Pall.) en el sur de Chile
Visitas
7010
Gastón Muñoza,
Autor para correspondencia
gmunoz@unab.cl

Corresponding author.
, Felipe Camposa, Daisy Salgadob, Rafael Galdamesb, Lucy Gilchristb, Gabriela Chahinb, Orlando Andradec
a Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Andrés Bello, Talcahuano, Chile
b Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (INIA) Carillanca, Temuco, Chile
c Escuela de Agronomía, Facultad de Recursos Naturales, Universidad Católica de Temuco, Temuco, Chile
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Resumen
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Figuras (2)
Tablas (1)
Table 1. Origin, characterization and identification of Botrytis isolates collected from peonies in Chile.
Abstract
Background

In Chile, the peony is the most important ornamental flower exported from the country. Gray mould is a phytopathological problem of this crop. This disease is caused by Botrytis cinerea and Botrytis paeoniae.

Aims

We carried out the first survey of Botrytis species associated with peony gray mould in Southern Chile to estimate the diversity of these pathogens.

Methods

Diseased peony leaves were collected from seven locations in Southern Chile covering a distance of 300km. The Botrytis isolates obtained were studied by morphological and molecular methods. Finally, a PCR assay using primers based on the necrosis and ethylene-inducing protein gene (nep1) was used to specifically identify B. paeoniae.

Results

Seventeen isolates belonging to Botrytis genus were obtained, and all of them were pathogenic to peonies when inoculated in plants grown in a greenhouse. Morphological analyses showed that four isolates shared common characteristics, which distinguish them from the rest. Homology and phylogenetic analysis of G3PDH, as well as determination of the Bc-hch allele, allowed us to identify 12 isolates as B. cinerea, 4 as B. paeoniae and one isolate as Botrytis pseudocinerea. The PCR assay was found to be specific to B. paeoniae, amplifying a single band of 470bp.

Conclusions

Three Botrytis species involved in peony gray mould disease are present in Chile. This is the first time that both B. paeoniae and B. pseudocinerea have been reported to be present in the country and also that they affect peonies. Finally, to our knowledge, the PCR based method herein described is the first of its kind to be used to identify B. paeoniae.

Keywords:
Peony
Gray mould
Botrytis
Molecular identification
Resumen
Antecedentes

La peonía es la principal flor ornamental de exportación en Chile. La pudrición gris, causada por los hongos Botrytis cinerea y Botrytis paeoniae, es uno de los problemas fitopatológicos más importantes de su cultivo.

Objetivos

Realizar una primera estimación de la diversidad de especies del género Botrytis asociadas a la pudrición gris de la peonía en el sur de Chile.

Métodos

Se recogieron hojas de peonías con síntomas de pudrición gris en siete lugares del sur de Chile, cubriendo una distancia de 300km. Se estudiaron morfológica y molecularmente los aislamientos de Botrytis obtenidos. Finalmente, se desarrolló un ensayo de PCR específico para identificar B. paeoniae basado en el gen nep1.

Resultados

Se obtuvieron 17 aislamientos del género Botrytis; todos ellos causaron pudrición gris en plantas de peonía en ensayos de invernadero. Los análisis morfológicos mostraron que cuatro aislamientos compartían características comunes que los distinguen del resto. La homología y el análisis filogenético basado en el gen G3PDH y la determinación del alelo Bc-hch permitieron identificar 12 cepas como B. cinerea, 4 como B. paeoniae y un aislamiento como Botrytis pseudocinerea. Finalmente, el ensayo de PCR resultó específico para B. paeoniae al amplificar una sola banda de 470 pb.

Conclusiones

Tres especies de Botrytis están presentes en Chile asociadas a la pudrición gris de las peonías, y se describe por primera vez en este país la presencia de B. paeoniae y B. pseudocinerea como especies patógenas de los cultivos de esta planta. Hasta donde conocen los autores, se describe por primera vez un ensayo de PCR para identificar específicamente B. paeoniae.

Palabras clave:
Peonía
Pudrición gris
Botrytis
Identificación molecular
Texto completo

Peony (Paeonia lactiflora Pall.) is an ornamental plant, native to China, and due to its high ornamental value it has become popular and has gained attention around the world.25 In Chile, peonies were introduced as a new option of economic activity in the south of the country leading this commercial crop to represent 46% of the total income value of all exported flowers.2

Gray mould is one of the most important diseases of the peony and it is caused by two fungal species: the non-host specialized plant pathogen Botrytis cinerea and the peony-specific pathogen Botrytis paeoniae.3 Both species have been reported to be widely distributed around the world such as in the USA,3 Iran16 and China,26 but the relative importance of these pathogens is still unknown. Despite the availability of taxonomic guides, there is a lack of alternative, efficient and reproducible methods for the identification of Botrytis species.9,16 However, several genes have been used to evaluate the phylogeny and evolution of Botrytis and could be used for molecular identification.20,21,24 In the case of B. cinerea, the presence or absence of two transposons, Boty and Flipper, in the genome of the pathogen allows for the establishment of the genotypes named vacuma (isolates without either transposon) and transposa (isolates with both transposons).8 Both genotypes are associated with differences in their ecology and population biology, such as in their host range and their genetic diversity, despite being frequently found in sympatry.4,8,15,17–19 Studies based on multiple gene genealogies have shown that B. cinerea is in fact a complex of at least two genetically different groups, Group I and Group II, which were proposed to be phylogenetic species.6,7 Group I isolates belong exclusively to the vacuma genotype and were formally described as a new species called B. pseudocinerea.24 Group II isolates include both vacuma and transposa genotypes and are referred to as B. cinerea.6,7

Due to the exportation increase of this species, peony cultivation has become more intensive, which has increased the risk of phytosanitary problems. Therefore, we conducted the first survey of its pathogens to characterize and to identify the species involved in the peony gray mould found in the main production area of Southern Chile. For this study, infected peony plants were collected from November to March during 2008 to 2010 in seven commercial fields of peonies located at seven sites covering a distance of 300km between Collipulli and Pilmaiquen (Table 1). Leaves with gray mould symptoms were incubated in a humid chamber until profuse sporulation was observed. Conidia were collected and plated onto half strength PDA plates (Potato-Dextrose Agar, Gibco/BRL, 1.5% agar) in order to obtain monosporic isolates.

Table 1.

Origin, characterization and identification of Botrytis isolates collected from peonies in Chile.

Species identified  Locationc  Isolate code  Mycelium color  Mycelium aspectsd  Sporulation (days)e  Conidium size (μm)  Sclerotia formation (days)f  Number of sclerotiag  Sclerotium size (mm)  Genotypeh  Aggressivenessi 
Botrytis cinereaa,b  Collipulli  IBx8  Gray-greenish  Normal  9.1×7.2  3.5×1.8  Transposa 
  Collipulli  IBx14  Gray-brown  Normal  9.2×8.5  65  2.8×1.8  Flipper 
  Collipulli  IBx17  Gray-brown  Normal  10×7.9  53  3.7×3.2  Transposa 
  Cunco  IBx1  White  Sparce  7.6×6.9  70  2.8×2.1  Transposa 
  Freire  IBx3  Gray  Cottony  7.9×7.4  44  4.2×2.6  Flipper 
  Freire  IBx13  Gray-greenish  Normal  9.5×7.3  49  2.8×2.6  Transposa 
  Gorbea  IBx4  Gray  Normal  9.5×8.5  48  5.6×3.1  Flipper 
  Gorbea  IBx5  Gray  Normal  8.2×7.2  28  6.2×4.2  Flipper 
  Gorbea  IBx6  Gray-brown  Normal  12×10  4.2×1.9  Flipper 
  Gorbea  IBx10  Gray-greenish  Cottony  8.3×45  4.3×Flipper 
  Panguipulli  IBx2  Gray-brown  Normal  8.7×8.4  106  3.8×2.8  Boty 
  Panguipulli  IBx11  Gray-greenish  Normal  9.3×10  48  3.8×Flipper 
Botrytis paeoniaea  Vilcún  IBx16  White  Cottony  9.5×7.1  15  43  1.9×1.2  Transposa 
  Vilcun  IBx9  White  Cottony  12×9.6  15  17  2.3×2.2  Transposa 
  Panguipulli  IBx7  White  Cottony  9×15  37  2.2×Boty 
  Pilmaiquen  IBx12  White  Cottony  8.9×7.6  15  16  2.5×1.7  Transposa 
Botrytis pseudocinereaa,b  Gorbea  IBx15  White  Normal  8.8×182  1.6×1.3  Flipper 
a

Identification based on GPDH homology and phylogeny.

b

Identification based on Bc-hch allele determination.

c

Locations are listed from north to south.

d

Mycelium was considered as “normal” when white, gray or greenish aerial hyphae, sporulating or sclerotium were observed; “sparse” when a thin layer of mycelium stacked on the agar surface were observed, and “cottony” when abundant and dense white aerial mycelium was observed.

e

The time at which the first conidiophores with conidia were observed under the stereo microscope.

f

The onset of sclerotia formation was considered as the time at which a white or gray hyphae aggregated into small knots was observed.

g

Number of sclerotia formed per plate.

h

Determined by PCR-based detection of Boty and Flipper transposons.

i

0, absence of lesion; 1, less than 2mm lesion; 2, 2 to 3mm lesion; 3, 3 to 5mm lesion; and 4, over 5mm lesions.

To characterize the isolates morphologically, mycelium was inoculated in the center of half strength PDA plates and was cultivated at 25°C in darkness. Observations of three replicate plates per isolate were made daily considering mycelium color and texture, the beginning of sporulation (determined as the time at which it was possible to observe the first conidiophores with conidia under the stereo microscope), the onset of sclerotia formation (considered as the time at which it was possible to detect the initial stage of sclerotium, as white or gray hyphae aggregated into small knots), and conidia and sclerotia size (determined by recording length and width of 50 conidia and 20 sclerotia under a light microscope or a stereo microscope using a micrometer installed in one of the ocular lenses).

Pathogenic assays were carried out in a greenhouse using 3-month-old peony cv. “Boule de Neige” plants potted in natural fertile soil. Each isolate was inoculated into two peony plants. Three leaves per plant were punctured and inoculated with a 4mm diameter PDA disk containing conidia and mycelium of the isolate. The fourth leaf (control) was inoculated with a PDA disk without the fungus. Plants were immediately sprayed with sterile distilled water and then were covered with a transparent plastic bag for 72h and kept in a greenhouse at 22–26°C for nine days. Then, the diameter of the necrotic lesion formed around each PDA disk was measured. Aggressiveness was determined using a scale of 0–4 defined as: 0, absence of lesion; 1, less than 2mm lesion; 2, 2–3mm lesion; 3, 3–5mm lesion; and 4, over 5mm lesions.

All of the 17 isolates selected for this study produced the characteristic gray mould lesion in the peony leaves under greenhouse conditions (Table 1), demonstrating all of them were pathogenic to the host plant. The level of infection was high and fairly homogeneous among the isolates, most of them scoring an aggressiveness of 3–4. Morphologically, at least two groups were detected when cultivated on PDA plates (Table 1). One group composed of isolates IBx7, IBx9, IBx12 and IBx16 showed fairly similar phenotypes such as abundant white aerial mycelium, conidia produced after seven days, and sclerotia observed after 15 days. The remaining isolates presented a mycelium such as that observed in Botrytis species with sporulation developing after 4–7 days and sclerotia being produced after 6–9 days.

The identification of Botrytis species was done by sequencing and phylogenetic analysis. In this regard, genomic DNA was extracted from each isolate as previously described,18 and a fragment of the G3PDH gene was amplified by PCR20 and sequenced at Unidad de Secuenciamiento Automático de ADN (Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile). The obtained sequences (GenBank accession numbers KF015582 to KF015598, Fig. 1) were first analyzed for homology to known sequences with the BLAST program and the nucleotide databases.1 All sequences obtained showed corresponding matches to B. cinerea or B. paeoniae except for the isolate IB×15 that was homologous to B. pseudocinerea (JN692414). For the phylogenetic analysis, the corresponding G3PDH gene fragment of B. cinerea (AJ705005, AJ705006, AM231156 and AM231160), B. paeoniae (AJ705027, AJ705028, EF36130 and EF677131) and other Botrytis species (B. tulipae AJ705042; B. gladiorum AJ705020; B. squamosa AJ705038 and B. elliptica AM231166) were considered. Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (AF417110) and Monilinia fructigena (AJ705043) were used as out-group controls. For the phylogenetic analysis, the sequences were first aligned and then analyzed using the neighbor-joining method of the distance matrix with 1000 bootstrap replicates using the MEGA4.0 program.22 The dendrogram obtained (Fig. 1) showed that 12 isolates (IBx1, IBx2, IBx3, IBx4 IBx5 IBx6 IBx8 IBx10 IBx11 IBx13 IBx14 and IBx17) clustered with B. cinerea and four isolates (IBx7, IBx9, Bx12 and IBx16) formed a group with B. paeoniae. The species B. cinerea and B. pseudocinerea were confirmed by determination of the Bc-hch allele as previously described.7

Fig. 1.

Phylogenetic dendrogram constructed using neighbor-joining analysis of a GPDH fragments. The fungal species considered in this analysis and their corresponding GenBank accession numbers are indicated on the figure. The dendrogram was rooted with Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and Monilinia fructigena. Bootstrap values are given at each branch. The bar indicates the expected changes per site.

(0.22MB).

Despite being expected, the presence of B. paeoniae has not been previously described in Chile. These isolates were collected in three different locations including Vilcún, Panguipulli and Pilmaiquen, thus suggesting that this pathogen is widely distributed throughout the country. Because peony production is a very recent economic activity in Southern Chile, and also due to the host specialization of this species, it is highly probable that B. paeoniae was introduced to the country along with the plant.

Detection of B. pseudocinerea was an unexpected finding and to our knowledge this is the first time this species has been reported in peonies and also in Chile. As previously described for other crops in the rest of the world,5,10,11,13–15,19,24B. pseudocinerea seems to be infrequent in peonies in Chile. However, a more detailed study is needed to establish the real frequency of this species.

In order to make comparisons with Botrytis populations previously described in Chile, isolates were genotyped using PCR to detect the presence of Boty and Flipper transposons as previously described.17 Noteworthily, we found that the isolate IBx15 contained only the Flipper transposon (Table 1). In France, B. pseudocinerea populations have been described to be composed of only vacuma isolates.6,7,24 Our result agrees with those reported in Hungary5 and New Zealand,11 where a wide diversity of transposon types have been found in the B. cinerea populations. In addition, a high frequency of the Flipper genotype (7 out of 12 isolates) was found in the isolates identified as B. cinerea, while the other genotypes were mainly transposa (4 out of 12 isolates) and only one isolate was identified as Boty (Table 1). The Flipper genotype has been nearly absent in most commercial crops studied4,10,13,15,17 and has only been detected at significant levels in six plant hosts in Greece19 and in vineyards in Hungary.23 The particular distribution of these genotypes in the B. cinerea isolates suggests that the population of pathogens present in peonies might be different from those previously described in other crops in Chile.4,17,18

Finally, a specific PCR-based assay was established based on the necrosis and ethylene-inducing protein 1 gene (nep1).21Nep1 sequences corresponding to B. paeoniae (AM087032 and AM087033) were aligned with those corresponding to B. cinerea (AM087032, DQ211824 and JN672679) using the Clustal Omega program [http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/help]. Primers BpNP1-F41 (5′-GCTACAGTCCCTCACGATTCG-3′) and BpNP1-R510 (5′-TAAGGTGGGGTTGGGGAGGG-3′) were designed using the Fast-PCR program.12 DNA amplifications were done with GoTaq Hot Start Polymerase (Promega) under reaction conditions recommended by the manufacturer; primers were used at 200nM, DNA ranged from 5 to 20ng, and the final volume of the reaction was 20μl. The program cycles were 2min at 95°C followed by 35 cycles of 20s at 95°C, 20s at 58°C and 20s at 72°C, and a final extension step of 5min at 72°C. Reactions were carried out in My Cycler™ thermal cycler (BioRad). Amplified products were visualized on 1% agarose gels stained with SafeView nucleic acid stain (NBS Biologicals Ltd), illuminated under UV light and digitally recorded. Other Botrytis isolates included in these assays were Botrytis aclada 961, Botrytis allii 403, Botrytis byssoidea 94, Botrytis squamosa 1107, Botrytis tulipae 9701 and B. paeoniae strains 771 and 16084 (a donation from Jan Van Kan, Wageningen University). Our results showed that the designed primers amplified a single DNA band of the expected size specific to B. paeoniae isolates (470bp, Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

PCR identification of B. paeoniae using BpNP1-F41 and BpNP1-R510 primers. Lanes 1–5 correspond to the DNA samples of B. aclada, B. allii, B. byssoidea, B. squamosa and B. tulipae. Lanes 6–10 correspond to the DNA of B. paeoniae, isolates 1908, IBx7, IBx9, IBx12 and IBx16. Lane 11 corresponds to isolate IBx15 of B. pseudocinerea. Lanes 12–15 correspond to DNA samples of B. cinerea isolates IBx1, IBx2, IBx6 and IBx16. Lane 16 represents the 1kb ladder DNA.

(0.08MB).

In conclusion, B. cinerea, B. paeoniae and B. pseudocinerea, are present in Chile and are involved in peony gray mould disease. This study represents the first report of B. paeoniae and B. pseudocinerea existence and also that they affect peonies in this country. Finally, to our knowledge, the PCR-based method herein described is used for the first time to identify B. paeoniae.

Disclosure statement

Authors have nothing to declare.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

Authors kindly thank Dr. Jan Van Kan (Laboratory of Phytopathology, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands) for kindly providing the DNA samples included in this study. This work was partially supported by Fundación para la Innovación Agraria, project PIT-2007-0247 granted to G. Chahin.

References
[1]
S.F. Altschul, W. Gish, W. Miller, E.W. Myers, D.J. Lipman.
Basic local alignment search tool.
J Mol Biol, 215 (1990), pp. 403-410
[2]
Cortez P. Caracterización del mercado de las flores en Chile. OFICINA DE ESTUDIOS Y POLÍTICAS AGRARIAS. [web site document]. 2014. [visited 15-12-2014]. Available at: http://www.odepa.cl/wp-content/files_mf/1400271905Floresdecorte201404.pdf.
[3]
Compendium of flowering potted plant disease,
[4]
M. Esterio, G. Muñoz, C. Ramos, G. Cofré, R. Estévez, A. Salinas, et al.
Characterization of Botrytis cinerea isolates present in Thompson Seedless table grapes in Chile.
Plant Dis, 95 (2011), pp. 683-690
[5]
E. Fekete, L. Irinyi, L. Karaffa, M. Árnyasi, M. Asadollahi, E. Sándor.
Genetic diversity of a Botrytis cinerea cryptic species complex in Hungary.
Microbiol Res, 167 (2012), pp. 283-291
[6]
E. Fournier, T. Giraud, A. Albertini, Y. Brygoo.
Partition of the Botrytis cinerea complex in France using multiple gene genealogies.
Mycologia, 97 (2005), pp. 1251-1267
[7]
E. Fournier, C. Levis, D. Fortini, P. Leroux, T. Giraud, Y. Brygoo.
Characterization of Bc-hch the Botrytis cinerea homolog of the Neurospora crassa het-c vegetative incompatibility locus and its use as a population marker.
Mycologia, 95 (2003), pp. 251-261
[8]
T. Giraud, D. Fortini, C. Levis, P. Leroux, Y. Brygoo.
RFLP Markers show genetic recombination in Botryotinia fuckeliana (Botrytis cinerea) and transposable elements reveal two sympatric species.
Mol Biol Evol, 14 (1997), pp. 1177-1185
[9]
G.L. Hennebert.
Botrytis and Botrytis-like genera.
Persoonia, 7 (1973), pp. 183-204
[10]
D.A. Isenegger, W.J. Macleod, R. Ford, P.W.J. Taylor.
Genotypic diversity and migration of clonal lineages of Botrytis cinerea from chickpea fields of Bangladesh inferred by microsatellite markers.
Plant Pathol, 57 (2008), pp. 967-973
[11]
P.R. Johnston, K. Hoksbergen, D. Park, R.E. Beever.
Genetic diversity of Botrytis in New Zealand vineyards and the significance of its seasonal and regional variation.
Plant Pathol, 63 (2013), pp. 888-898
[12]
R. Kalendar, D. Lee, A.H. Schulman.
Java web tools for PCR in silico PCR and oligonucleotide assembly and analysis.
Genomics, 98 (2011), pp. 137-144
[13]
S. Karchani-Balma, A. Gautier, A. Raies, E. Fournier.
Geography plants and growing systems shape the genetic structure of Tunisian Botrytis cinerea populations.
Phytopathology, 98 (2008), pp. 1271-1279
[14]
M. Kretschmer, M. Hahn.
Fungicide resistance and genetic diversity of Botrytis cinerea isolates from a vineyard in Germany.
J Plant Dis Prot, 115 (2008), pp. 214-219
[15]
Z. Ma, T.J. Michailides.
Genetic structure of Botrytis cinerea populations from different host plants in California.
Plant Dis, 89 (2005), pp. 1083-1089
[16]
S. Mirzaei, E. Mohammadi-Goltapeh, M. Shams-Bakhsh, N. Safaie.
Identification of Botrytis spp. on Plants Grown in Iran.
J Phytopathol, 156 (2008), pp. 21-28
[17]
G. Muñoz, F. Campos.
Genetic characterization of Botrytis cinerea isolates collected from pine and eucalyptus nurseries in Bio-Bio Region Chile.
For Pathol, 43 (2013), pp. 509-512
[18]
G. Muñoz, P. Hinrichsen, Y. Brygoo, T. Giraud.
Genetic characterization of Botrytis cinerea populations in Chile.
Mycol Res, 106 (2002), pp. 594-601
[19]
S. Samuel, T. Veloukas, A. Papavasileiou, G.S. Karaoglanidis.
Differences in frequency of transposable elements presence in Botrytis cinerea populations from several hosts in Greece.
Plant Dis, 96 (2012), pp. 1286-1290
[20]
M. Staats, P. van Baarlen, J.A.L. van Kan.
Molecular phylogeny of the plant pathogenic genus Botrytis and the evolution of host specificity.
Mol Biol Evol, 22 (2005), pp. 333-346
[21]
M. Staats, P. van Baarlen, A. Schouten, J.A. van Kan, F.T. Bakker.
Positive selection in phytotoxic protein-encoding genes of Botrytis species.
Fungal Genet Biol, 44 (2007), pp. 52-63
[22]
K. Tamura, J. Dudley, M. Nei, S. Kumar.
MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0.
Mol Biol Evol, 24 (2007), pp. 1596-1599
[23]
K.Z. Váczy, E. Sándor, L. Karaffa, E. Fekete, E. Fekete, M. Árnyasi, et al.
Sexual recombination in the Botrytis cinerea populations in hungarian vineyards.
Phytopathology, 98 (2008), pp. 1312-1319
[24]
A.S. Walker, A.L. Gautier, J. Confais, D. Martinho, M. Viaud, P.L.P. Cheur, et al.
Botrytis pseudocinerea a new cryptic species causing gray mold in French vineyards in sympatry with Botrytis cinerea.
Phytopathology, 101 (2011), pp. 1433-1445
[25]
E.F. Waltona, H.L. Boldinghb, G.F. McLarenc, M.H. Williams, R. Jackman.
The dynamics of starch and sugar utilisation in cut peony (Paeonia lactiflora Pall) stems during storage and vase life.
Postharvest Biol Technol, 58 (2010), pp. 142-146
[26]
X.Y. Wang, L.X. Zhang, Z.Y. Zhang.
A new species of Botrytis and 5 known Botrytis species in China.
Acta Phytopathol Sin, 26 (1996), pp. 79-85
Copyright © 2014. Revista Iberoamericana de Micología
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo
Quizás le interese:
10.1016/j.riam.2024.04.003
No mostrar más