metricas
covid
Buscar en
Clinics
Toda la web
Inicio Clinics Changes in fluconazole pharmacokinetics can impact on antifungal effectiveness i...
Información de la revista
Vol. 79. (En progreso)
(enero - diciembre 2024)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Visitas
214
Vol. 79. (En progreso)
(enero - diciembre 2024)
Original articles
Acceso a texto completo
Changes in fluconazole pharmacokinetics can impact on antifungal effectiveness in critically ill burn patients: a Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) approach
Visitas
214
Victor Kaneko Matsuno
Autor para correspondencia
victor.matsuno@usp.br

Corresponding author.
, Edvaldo Vieira de Campos, Elson Mendes da Silva Junior, João Manoel da Silva Junior, David de Souza Gomez, Silvia Regina Cavani Jorge Santos
Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
Highlights

  • Fluconazole pharmacokinetics is significantly altered in critically ill burn patients.

  • Half-life and total body clearance were correlated to volume of distribution decrease.

  • High-dose fluconazole may be necessary to guarantee coverage against Candida glabrata.

Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Resumen
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Figuras (2)
Tablas (1)
Table 1. Descriptive characteristics of critically ill severely burned patients.
Material adicional (1)
Abstract
Objectives

The Fluconazole pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship was investigated in a few clinical settings and only limited studies regarding burned patients are available. Thus, the authors aimed to investigate fluconazole pharmacokinetics changes and its impact on antifungal therapy coverage against dose-dependent Candida spp. applying the PK/PD approach in critically ill severely burned patients.

Methods

Fluconazole was administered as a one-hour intravenous infusion of 200 mg q12h. Doses were increased according to the coverage based on the PK/PD approach. Blood samples were collected at the end of the infusion (1st hour), two hours after (3rd hour), and before the next dose (12th or 24th hour). Serum concentrations were obtained by HPLC-UV. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by noncompartmental analysis and compared with data described in healthy subjects. The effectiveness predictive index was based on the AUCss0-24h/MIC ratio, with a target above 25.

Results

Every pharmacokinetic parameter was reduced throughout all three sets of the study. Compared to healthy subjects, the volume of distribution was decreased about 3‒7 times, biological half-life was 2‒3 times shorter and total body clearance was slightly altered but statistically significant. Both half-life and total body clearance were correlated to the volume of distribution. Consequently, an increase in fluconazole daily dose was necessary to improve empiric coverage.

Conclusions

Fluconazole pharmacokinetics is altered in critically ill severely burned patients, mainly related to the volume of distribution. Doses higher than usual may be necessary to reach the PK/PD target and guarantee antifungal coverage against dose-dependent Candida spp. up to MIC 32 mg/L.

Keywords:
Fluconazole
Pharmacokinetics
Candidiasis
Burn
Critical care
Texto completo
Introduction

Burn wounds are associated with high morbimortality and therefore have a markedly impact on economics and healthcare systems. The mortality rate is estimated at around 180,000 cases per year worldwide, with higher prevalence in developing countries since socioeconomic status is the main factor associated with poor outcomes.1,2

Burned patients are more susceptible to fungal infections as a result of skin barrier disruption and immune dysregulation induced by the burn and the tissue repair process.3-5

Candida spp. represents about 80% of nosocomial fungal infections and it is estimated around 2.5 cases per 1000 admissions along with mortality rates above 50% in critical care units. In addition, invasive fungal infection diagnosis can be challenging because of confounder factors and prolonged time to culture positivity.6-8

Sepsis-related mortality increases with partial effectiveness or inefficacy of the antimicrobial therapy, which depends on the interaction between the antimicrobial drug, pathogen, and host. In general, it can be outlined as the patient's clinical status and the antimicrobial therapy Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationship.9-11

Systemic inflammatory and metabolic responses to severe burns affect drug pharmacokinetics significantly. Haemodynamic impairment and shock, edema, and protein synthesis shift, among others, can lead to several changes in pharmacokinetic parameters.12,13

Few fluconazole studies regarding PK/PD approach are available, and even fewer considering severely burned patients. Hence, it is expected that fluconazole conventional doses may not guarantee appropriate coverage during septic shock in extensively burned patients, in the same way, that it has already been shown to other hydrophilic antimicrobial agents and patient populations.14-18

The authors hypothesize that critically ill burned patients present altered pharmacokinetics which may benefit from higher doses of fluconazole therapy to achieve adequate PK/PD effectiveness prediction index. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate fluconazole pharmacokinetics in burned patients and evaluate its impact on PK/PD target attainment against Candida spp. with dose-dependent susceptibility such as C. glabrata (MIC 16‒32 mg/L).

Materials and methodsStudy design

A prospective cohort investigation was conducted in a tertiary public hospital's 16-beds burn intensive care unit. Eight adult patients (> 18-years) severely burned (total body surface area burned > 15%), with documented C. glabrata infection, in septic shock requiring vasopressor therapy and receiving intravenous fluconazole as antifungal therapy for more than 72h were enrolled. Exclusion criteria at baseline were severe neutropenia (< 500 mm3), renal impairment (creatinine clearance < 50 mL/min, estimated by Cockcroft-Gault formula) or in renal replacement therapy, pregnant and lactating women, or patients with hypersensibility to fluconazole or any drug formulation excipient.

Fluconazole administration and therapeutic drug monitoring

Fluconazole was initiated at the recommended empirical dose, 200 mg twice daily (set 1), followed by 400 mg once daily (set 2), and afterward increased to 400 mg twice daily (set 3) for optimization of the antifungal therapy. Every dose was administered as a one-hour Intravenous (IV) infusion.

Blood samples of 2 mL were collected at the steady state (after at least 72h of fluconazole therapy), at the end of the one-hour infusion (1st hour), two hours after the end of the infusion (3rd hour) and before the next dose (12th or 24th hour depending on dose regimen).

Bioanalytical procedures including purification of blood samples followed by fluconazole extraction and quantification method were developed and validated in a previous study.19 Serum samples were obtained by centrifugation of the blood at 2800g at room temperature for 20 min. Fluconazole was extracted from serum by liquid-liquid chromatography with dichloromethane in an alkaline medium. After centrifugation (at 2800 g, 5°C), the aqueous phase was discarded, and the organic phase was cooled for decantation in an ice bath and then dried to residue under a nitrogen stream. Then the residue obtained after dichloromethane evaporation was redissolved in a mixture of acetonitrile and ultrapure water (6:4 v/v), transferred to an analytical microvial and inserted into the chromatograph autosampler rack, which also contained the calibration curve and internal quality controls. Quantification was performed by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detectors set at 210 nm (Shimadzu LC10 ADvp, Kyoto, Japan). The chromatographic system was a Shimpack CN column of 150 × 6.0 mm, 5 μm (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), and a binary mobile phase of acetonitrile and ultrapure water (6:4 v/v). A 15-min isocratic analytical run was performed to guarantee selectivity.

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic approach

Fluconazole pharmacokinetics was performed by a noncompartmental data analysis. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated based on a one-compartment open model by first-order linear equations as described in Supplementary Table 1. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) was integrated by the trapezoidal rule.20

Fluconazole effectiveness predictive index was calculated based on the area under the curve of 24h (AUCss24h) and the theoretical Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) for Candida spp. with dose-dependent susceptibility (MIC 16‒32 mg/L). An ASCss0-24h/MIC ratio above 25 was considered as the therapeutic target recommendation.21,22

To establish a reference range for each fluconazole pharmacokinetic parameter, data from healthy volunteers was extracted from the literature23-29 and a meta-analysis was performed considering mean values, variance/standard deviation, and sample size. Combined healthy volunteers' half-life, Volume of distribution (Vd), and total body Clearance (CLT) are 27.5 ± 9.3h, 48.70 ± 11.05 L and 1.18 ± 0.30 L/h, respectively, as described in Supplementary Table 2.

Statistical analysis

Pharmacokinetic data from the burned patients were expressed as median (interquartile range) and analyzed by GraphPad Prism for Windows v9.1.1, GraphPad Software Inc. (San Diego, California, USA) using a non-parametric comparative method for paired samples (Wilcoxon signed-rank test) with a significance level of 5% (p < 0.05). Data correlation was performed by Pearson linear correlation coefficient, considering a significance level of 5% (p < 0.05) and a 95% Confidence Interval.

Ethics

Protocol was registered and approved by the hospital ethics committee (CAEE 07525118.3.0000.0068). Every patient was presented with written informed consent. The signature of the patient or legal guardian was collected at the end of the orientation. This study was also conducted in accordance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles.

Results

Baseline patient characteristics are presented in Table 1. Eight critically ill burned patients (4 female and 4 male) in septic shock with invasive candidiasis were enrolled in the study.

Table 1.

Descriptive characteristics of critically ill severely burned patients.

Demographic characteristics   
Female/Male  4/4 
Age (years)  35.5 (31.2‒42.8) 
TBW (kg)  70.0 (61.2‒73.8) 
IBW (kg)  62.5 (52.0‒70.0) 
BSAa (m21.81 (1.66‒1.87) 
BMIa (kg/m224.2 (23.5‒25.9) 
Baseline/Admission characteristics   
TBSA burned (%)  46.0 (36.0‒53.8) 
Mechanical ventilation  7/8 
SAPS-3*  61.0 (55.0‒67.8) 
Urea (mg/dL)  29.0 (28.0‒31.8) 
SCr (mg/dL)  0.83 (0.71‒1.04) 
CLSCra (mL/min)  106.7 (94.7‒132.8) 
CRP (mg/L)  3.4 (2.4‒112.8) 
Lactate (mg/dL)  26.5 (19.0‒37.5) 
WBC (1,000/mm313.02 (10.78‒18.43) 
Neutrophils (1,000/mm39.84 (6.18‒15.80) 
Platelets (1,000/mm3274.0 (227.3‒361.8) 
Clinical/surgical characteristics during hospital stay   
Vasoactive drug  8/8 
Surgery  9.0 (4.2‒14.2) 
Escharotomy/grafting  5.5 (4.0‒8.0) 
Amputation and revision surgery  1.5 (0.0‒6.0) 
Microbiological cure  8/8 
ICU LOS (days)  49.0 (37.2‒93.0) 
Hospital LOS (days)  57.0 (37.2‒153.0) 
Death  4/8 

Values are presented as median (interquartile range) or as absolute count.

BMI, Body Mass Index; BSA, Body Surface Area; CLSCr, Creatinine clearance; CRP, C-Reactive Protein; IBW, Ideal Body Weight; ICU, Intensive Care Unit; LOS, Length of Stay; SAPS-3*, Simplified Acute Physiology Score (for Latin America); SCr, Serum Creatinine; TBSA, Total Body Surface Area; TBW, Total Body Weight; WBC, White Blood Cells.

The median age and weight were 36 years old and 70 kg, respectively. Only one of the patients was obese (body mass index of 35.3 kg/m2), but the dose regimen was estimated based on the ideal body weight for all of them. At admission, patients had a median SAPS-3* of 61 and a median Total Body Surface Area (TBSA) burned of 46%. Nearly all patients had inhalation injuries (7/8), requiring mechanical ventilation for airway protection.

All of the patients required vasoactive drugs due to hypotension and septic shock, maintaining it throughout all three treatment regimen sets. Several surgical procedures were performed, such as debridement, escharotomy, grafting, amputation, and revision surgery with a median of nine surgeries per patient. Patients were hospitalized for a median of 57 days with a median Length of Stay (LOS) in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of 49 days. All patients achieved microbiological cure from invasive candidiasis in spite of the death of half of them.

Patients received a median fluconazole dose of 5.71 mg/kg/day initially (set 1 and 2), then increased to 11.43 mg/kg/day in set 3 (based on ideal body weight). Fluconazole AUCss0-24h was directly proportional to the daily dose (Pearson r = 0.7685, p < 0.0001). Effectiveness predictive index of AUCss0-24h/MIC above at least 25 was achieved in all patients considering a MIC of 16 mg/L. In contrast, for a MIC of 32 mg/L, the target was reached only when the fluconazole dose was optimized (800 mg/day, set 3).

Fluconazole pharmacokinetic parameters and data correlations are presented in Figure 1. Every pharmacokinetic parameter was reduced in the burned patients compared with data described in healthy subjects, as shown in Figures 1A, 1B and 1C. Half-life reduction was proportionally related to Vd in all regimen sets (Pearson r = 0.9434, p < 0.001, Fig. 1D). Whilst CLT was lowered in a smaller magnitude and appears to be partially proportional to Vd (Pearson r = 0.8364, p < 0.001, Fig. 1E). However, there was no correlation between estimated Creatinine Clearance (CLSCr) and fluconazole CLT (p = 0.7904, Figs. 1F and 2).

Figure 1.

Fluconazole pharmacokinetic parameters in critically ill severely burned patients. (A) Volume of distribution, (B) Half-life, (C) Total body clearance, (D) Linear correlation of volume of distribution and half-life, (E) Linear correlation of volume of distribution and total body clearance, (F) Linear correlation of total body clearance and creatinine clearance. The reference range is presented as mean ± standard deviation. Data from this study is presented as median (interquartile range). Statistics: GraphPad Prism 9.1.1 (software); Wilcoxon signed-ranks test, a significance level of p < 0.05. TDM, Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.

(0.46MB).
Figure 2.

Fluconazole PK/PD target attainment in the critically ill severely burned patients. (A) AUCss0-24h/MIC. (B) fAUCss0-24h/MIC. Data from this study is presented as median (interquartile range). AUCss0-24h, Area Under the Concentration-time curve of 24h; fAUCss0-24h, Area Under the free Concentration-time curve of 24h; MIC, Minimum Inhibitory Concentration; TDM, Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.

(0.21MB).
Discussion

It is known that critically ill burned patients are more susceptible to invasive candidiasis and often experience changes in drug pharmacokinetics which can impact antifungal coverage and clinical outcome.4,5 However, there are insufficient fluconazole Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) studies to establish a universally accepted effectiveness predictor index. Only two studies included burned patients.30,31

Boucher and colleagues30 investigated fluconazole pharmacokinetics in ten patients with second and third-degree burns (mean TBSA burned 50±24%) who received 400 mg daily intravenous infusions. They described a slightly reduced half-life (25.8±6.1 h) and moderately augmented Vd and CLT (56±11 L and 1.65±0.40 L/h, respectively), which were opposed to this study. However, some significant differences can be acknowledged, for instance, patients with hemodynamic instability and vasopressor requirement were excluded.

Furthermore, Han and colleagues31 reported a pharmacokinetic model analysis of 60 burn patients who received 100 to 400 mg per day of fluconazole as a 10 to 40-min intravenous infusion. In spite of the fact that they do not describe every pharmacokinetic parameter, the data presented in the study implies that pharmacokinetic parameters were close to those reported in healthy volunteers. Again, the population enrolled did not include hemodynamically unstable patients. And, although APACHE II and SAPS-3* are not directly comparable, the reported mean APACHE II of 7.6 suggests a lower clinical severity and mortality risk than the patients here presented. In addition, the male proportion was considerably higher (50M/10F), which can impact population pharmacokinetics, since it has been already reported sex-related differences in half-life and Vd.32

Such differences can also be explained by other factors, such as the stage of the burn. Both studies described patients mainly in the early phase from the injury (< 30 days), whilst the patients started fluconazole around day 26 (median, range 14‒40 days). Therefore, to our knowledge, it is the first fluconazole pharmacokinetic description in critically ill severely burned patients in both the early and late phase of the burn, and also performing drug therapeutic monitoring in a three-set longitudinal analysis.

Fluconazole pharmacokinetic parameters were reduced throughout all three sets with a marked impact on Vd. The three to seven-fold reduction of Vd could be explained by the extensive burn lesions since prolonged half-life and high Vd of fluconazole are attributed to accumulation in epithelial tissue. It has been described that dermal-epidermal and stratum corneum concentrations are higher than serum concentration reaching up to 90-fold during prolonged fluconazole therapy.33-36

Additionally, stratum corneum concentration drops as soon as fluconazole is discontinued, however, dermal-epidermal concentration can remain stable for four to five days after the end of antifungal therapy, and even after 10 days fluconazole can be detected in considerable concentrations as fluconazole clearance from corneum stratum is about two to three times slower than plasma elimination half-life.36-38

On the other hand, the influence of Vd over CLT does not justify CLT decrease as it would be expected to be unaltered or even increased due to reduction of accumulation which would bring the serum concentration up and, thus, fluconazole would be more favorably cleared by the kidneys.

The reduction of CLT might reflect renal impairment associated with sepsis and hemodynamic instability. Besides that, protein-bound shift is well described in several clinical settings, including sepsis, cancer, chronic kidney disease, inflammatory conditions, and tissue injury/repairment processes.39-44

Alpha-1-acid glycoprotein is one of the acute-phase proteins that are upregulated during burn-induced tissue damage. It is associated with immunomodulation, fibroblast protection, and transport of inflammatory substances, as well as several drugs.39,40,45-48

Burn extent and tissue recovery time appear to be correlated to alpha-1-acid glycoprotein levels.49,50 Production starts rapidly in the initial 12 to 24 hours after the burn injury and can reach up to four-fold concentration in the next two weeks. After tissue recovery, alpha-1-acid glycoprotein concentration gradually decreases with a half-life of around two to five days but can remain significantly augmented over 20 days up to six weeks.45,48,49,51,52

Although there are no studies that evaluate fluconazole protein binding in burned patients, there is a significant correlation between alpha-1-acid glycoprotein serum concentration and fluconazole protein binding in chronic scenarios with an almost two-fold rise.41,42

Moreover, it would be likely to be even greater in burned patients since acute inflammatory conditions are associated with up to six times higher alpha-1-acid glycoprotein levels48 and, thus, its overexpression during burn-induced tissue injury/repairment and septic shock could explain the observed CLT reduction.

As exploratory data, it was noticed that every patient presented hypoalbuminemia during all three sets (mean 1.7 ± 0.6 g/dL) with a significant difference between the first and last measured serum albumin (2.8 ± 0.5 vs. 1.5 ± 0.4 g/dL, p < 0.0001), which is compatible to the expected shift on protein production. However, serum alpha-1-acid glycoprotein was not routinely monitored.

The authors estimated fAUCss0-24h/MIC assuming a 12% fluconazole protein binding as described in healthy subjects. Revising fluconazole coverage based on a higher protein binding of 22.9% as reported by Arredondo and colleagues,41,42fAUCss0-24h/MIC > 25 would be achieved only when MIC = 8 mg/L in the first set and when MIC = 32 mg/L only three patients of the last set would be covered.

There are some limitations regarding this study. This is a single-center experience with a small sample size and does not have a comparator group, therefore caution may be necessary when generalizing these results. The present study enrolled only enough patients to detect pharmacokinetics differences but not to elucidate those pharmacokinetic change mechanisms. Also, it was not the purpose of this study to assess clinical outcomes or compare treatment efficacy among those who reached or did not the therapeutic target. Therefore, further and larger studies are necessary to confirm these hypotheses and to better assess clinical outcomes and endpoints.

In addition, only patients without renal impairment were enrolled and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) was performed for all patients, which reduced toxicological concerning. In most clinical settings TDM is not feasible because there is not a commercial kit available for fluconazole TDM. Thus, kidney and liver function, as well as drug interactions, should be monitored during high-dose fluconazole treatment since it is expected to have a higher risk of kidney and liver impairment.

Finally, data reported by this study can contribute to better clinical decisions regarding fluconazole antifungal therapy in critically ill burned patients.

Conclusions

This is the first longitudinal fluconazole pharmacokinetic characterization study in critically ill severely burned patients at both the early and late phase of the burn and performed by PK/PD approach. Pharmacokinetic parameters differ significantly from healthy volunteers and these changes impact directly on antifungal therapy effectiveness predictive index. Consequently, higher than standard fluconazole doses are necessary in these clinical settings to guarantee empirical coverage against Candida spp. up to MIC 32 mg/L. Considering that most bedside and clinical settings where fluconazole therapeutic drug monitoring is not feasible, close monitoring of kidney and liver function should be granted before and throughout high-dose fluconazole treatment as it is expected to have a higher risk for toxicity.

Authors’ contributions

Victor Kaneko Matsuno: Conceptualization; Data curation; Formal analysis; Investigation; Methodology; Visualization; Writing - original draft; Writing - review & editing.

Edvaldo Vieira de Campos: Investigation; supervision; project administration.

Elson Mendes da Silva Junior: Investigation; supervision; project administration.

João Manoel da Silva Junior: Investigation; supervision; project administration.

David de Souza Gomez: Conceptualization; development and design, investigation; writing-review & editing; supervision; project administration.

Silvia Regina Cavani Jorge Santos: Conceptualization; Data curation; Formal analysis; Investigation; Methodology; Project administration; Supervision; Validation; Visualization; Writing - review & editing.

Funding

Master's degree scholarship (personal) ‒ CNPq / Mestrado ‒ GM (133851/2019-2) ‒ Victor Kaneko Matsuno.

Research Projects ‒ Thematic Grants (institutional) ‒ FAPESP (2018/05616-3) / “Farmacocinética clínica em doenças infecciosas” ‒ https://bv.fapesp.br/pt/auxilios/102788/farmacocinetica-clinica-em-doencas-infecciosas/.

References
[1]
C Smolle, J Cambiaso-Daniel, AA Forbes, P Wurzer, G Hundeshagen, LK Branski, et al.
Recent trends in burn epidemiology worldwide: A systematic review.
[2]
World Health Organization (WHO). Fact sheets – Burns. 2018. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/burns. [Accessed December 15th, 2019].
[3]
SA Bharwana, M Farid, S Ali, M Rizwan, M Nadeem, MW Haider, et al.
Mortality rate associated with hospital acquired infections among burn patients.
Biomed Res Ther, 3 (2016), pp. 790-799
[4]
W Norbury, DN Herndon, J Tanksley, MG Jeschke, CC. Finnerly.
Infection in Burns.
Surg Infect (Larchmt)., 17 (2016), pp. 250-255
[5]
CJ Walraven, RC Mercier, SA Lee.
Antifungal Pharmacokinetics and Dosing Considerations in Burn Patients.
Curr Fungal Infect Rep, 5 (2011), pp. 67-74
[6]
AL Colombo, M Nucci, BJ Park, SA Nouer, B Arthington-Skaggs, DA Da Matta, et al.
Epidemiology of candidemia in Brazil: A nationwide sentinel surveillance of candidemia in eleven medical centers.
J Clin Microbiol, 44 (2006), pp. 2816-2823
[7]
AL Colombo, T Guimaraes, LFA. Camargo, R Richtmann, F De Queiroz-Telle, MJC Salles, et al.
Brazilian guidelines for the management of candidiasis – a joint meeting report of three medical societies: Sociedade Brasileira de Infectologia, Sociedade Paulista de Infectologia and Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical.
Braz J Infect Dis, 17 (2013), pp. 283-312
[8]
PG Pappas, CA Kauffman, DR Andes, CJ Clancy, KA Marr, L Ostrosky-Zeichner, et al.
Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Candidiasis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.
CID, 62 (2016), pp. e1-50
[9]
SE Cain, J Kohn, PB Bookstaver, H Albrecht, MN Al-Hasan.
Stratification of the impact of inappropriate empirical antimicrobial therapy for Gram-negative bloodstream infections by predicted prognosis.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 59 (2015), pp. 245-250
[10]
E Asin-Prieto, A Rodriguez-Gascon, A. Isla.
Applications of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analysis of antimicrobial agents.
J Infect Chemother, 21 (2015), pp. 319-329
[11]
World Health Organization (WHO). Improving the prevention, diagnosis and clinical management of sepsis - Seventieth World Health Assembly. 2017. Available from: http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA70/A70_R7-en.pdf. [Accessed December 15th, 2019].
[12]
B Blanchet, V Jullien, C Vinsonneau, M. Tod.
Influence of burns on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs used in the care of burn patients.
Clin Pharmacokinet, 47 (2008), pp. 635-654
[13]
EA Bittner, E Shank, L Woodson, JAJ. Martyn.
Acute and perioperative care of the burn-injured patient.
Anesthesiology, 122 (2015), pp. 448-464
[14]
DS Gomez, EV Campos, RP Azevedo, JM Silva Jr, MC Ferreira, C Sanches-Giraud, et al.
Individualised vancomycin doses for paediatric burn patients to achieve PK/PD targets.
[15]
DS Gomez, CV Silva Jr, AM Oliveira, JM Silva Jr, R Gemperli, SR Santos.
Imipenem in burn patients: Pharmacokinetic profile and PK/PD target attainment.
J Antibiot (Tokyo), 68 (2015), pp. 143-147
[16]
SRCJ Santos, WV Guimaraes, DS. Gomez.
The Battle Against Nosocomial Pathogens for Sepsis Control in Paediatric Burn Patients: Vancomycin and Carbapenems Serum Monitoring for Target Attainment by PK/PD Analysis. In: The battle against microbial pathogens: Basic science, Technological Advances and Educational Programs. 1 ed.
Badajoz: Formatex Research Center, 2 (2015), pp. 806-821
[17]
JM Silva Jr, LVK Kupa, AMRR Oliveira, CV Silva Jr, SRCJ Santos, DS Gomez.
Meropenem effectiveness in septic burn patients by comparison of extended infusion versus fast infusion against susceptible strains based on drug plasma measurements done in a real time.
[18]
JM Silva Jr, LVK Kupa, AMRR Oliveira, CV Silva Jr, SRCJ Santos, DS Gomez.
Piperacillin effectiveness in septic burn patients by comparison of two empirical daily dose regimen recommended 12 versus 16g against susceptible strains based on drug plasma measurements done in a real time.
Crit. Care., 21 (2017), pp. 31
[19]
SRCJ Santos, EV Campos, C Sanches, DS Gomez, MC. Ferreira.
Fluconazole plasma concentration measurement by liquid chromatography for drug monitoring of burn patients.
Clinics, 65 (2010), pp. 237-243
[20]
JT Dipiro, WJ Spruill, WE Wade, RA Blouin, JM. Pruemer.
Concepts in Clinical Pharmacokinetics.
5th ed., American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, (2010),
[21]
A Louie, GL Drusano, PM Banerjee, QF Liu, W Liu, P Kaw, et al.
Pharmacodynamics of Fluconazole in a Murine Model of Systemic Candidiasis.
Antimicrobl Agents and Chemother, 42 (1998), pp. 1105-1109
[22]
D Andes, M. Van Ogtrop.
Characterization and Quantitation of the Pharmacodynamics of Fluconazole in a Neutropenic Murine Disseminated Candidiasis Infection Model.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 43 (1999), pp. 2116-2120
[23]
MJ Humphrey, S Jevons, MH. Tarbit.
Pharmacokinetic evaluation of UK-49,858, a metabolically stable triazole antifungal drug, in animals and humans.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 28 (1985), pp. 648-653
[24]
G Foulds, C Wajszczuk, DJ Weidler, DJ Garg, P. Gibson.
Steady state parenteral kinetics of fluconazole in man.
Ann N Y Acad Sci, 544 (1988), pp. 427-430
[25]
K Shiba, A Saito, T. Miyahara.
Safety and pharmacokinetics of single oral and intravenous doses of fluconazole in healthy subjects.
Clin Ther, 12 (1990), pp. 206-215
[26]
S Toon, CE Ross, R Goka, M. Rowland.
An assessment of the effects of impaired renal function and haemodialysis on the pharmacokinetics of fluconazole.
Br J Clin Pharmacol, 29 (1990), pp. 221-226
[27]
S Ripa, L Ferrante, M. Prenna.
Pharmacokinetics of fluconazole in normal volunteers.
Chemotherapy, 39 (1993), pp. 6-12
[28]
RA Yeats, M Ruhnke, G Pfaff, A Hartmann, M Trautmann, E. Sarnow.
The pharmacokinetics of fluconazole after a single intravenous dose in AIDS patients.
Br J Clin Pharmacol, 38 (1994), pp. 77-79
[29]
T Guo, WJ Sun, DY Xia, LS. Zhao.
The pharmacokinetics of fluconazole in healthy Chinese adult volunteers: influence of ethnicity and gender.
J Clin Pharm Ther, 35 (2010), pp. 231-237
[30]
BA Boucher, SR King, HL Wandschneider, WL Hickerson, SD Hanes, VL Herring, et al.
Fluconazole Pharmacokinetics in Burn Patients.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 42 (1998), pp. 930-933
[31]
S Han, J Kim, H Yim, J Hur, W Song, J Lee, et al.
Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Fluconazole To Predict Therapeutic Outcome in Burn Patients with Candida Infection.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 57 (2013), pp. 1006-1011
[32]
MC Carrasco-Portugal, FJ. Flores-Murrieta.
Gender differences in the oral pharmacokinetics of fluconazole.
Clin Drug Invest, 27 (2007), pp. 851-855
[33]
KW Brammer, R Farrow, JK. Faulkner.
Pharmacokinetics and Tissue Penetration of Fluconazole in Humans.
Rev Infect Dis, 12 (1990), pp. S318-S326
[34]
J Faergemann, H. Laufen.
Levels of fluconazole in serum, stratum corneum, epidermis-dermis (without stratum corneum) and eccrine sweat.
Clin Exp Dermatology, 18 (1993), pp. 102-106
[35]
J Faergemann, J Godleski, H Laufen, RH. Liss.
Intracutaneous Transport of Orally Administered Fluconazole to the Stratum Corneum.
Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh), 75 (1995), pp. 361-363
[36]
D. Debruyne.
Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Fluconazole in Superficial and Systemic Mycoses.
Clin Pharmocokinet., 33 (1997), pp. 52-77
[37]
J. Faergemann.
Pharmacokinetics of fluconazole in skin and nails.
J Am Acad Dermatol, 40 (1999), pp. S14-S20
[38]
E. Haneke.
Fluconazole levels in human epidermis and blister fluid.
Br J Dermatol, 123 (1990), pp. 273-274
[39]
BJ Moody, PG Shakespeare, GF. Batstone.
The Effects of Septic Complications upon the Serum Protein Changes Associated with Thermal Injury.
Ann Clin Biochem, 22 (1985), pp. 391-396
[40]
HZ Zokufa, LD Solem, KA Rodvold, KB Crossley, JH Fischer, JC. Rotschafer.
The influence of serum albumin and alpha 1-acid glycoprotein on vancomycin protein binding in patients with burn injuries.
J Burn Care Rehabil, 10 (1989), pp. 425-428
[41]
G Arredondo, R Martinez-Jorda, R Calvo, C Aguirre, E. Suarez.
Protein binding of itraconazole and fluconazole in patients with chronic renal failure.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther, 32 (1994), pp. 361-364
[42]
G Arredondo, R Calvo, F Marcos, R Martínez-Jordá, E Suarez.
Protein binding of itraconazole and fluconazole in patients with cancer.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther, 33 (1995), pp. 449-452
[43]
P De Paepe, FM Belpaire, WA. Buylaert.
Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Considerations When Treating Patients with Sepsis and Septic Shock.
Clin Pharmacokinet, 41 (2002), pp. 1135-1151
[44]
K Xiao, L Su, P Yan, B Han, J Li, H Wang, et al.
α-1-Acid glycoprotein as a biomarker for the early diagnosis and monitoring the prognosis of sepsis.
J Crit Care, 30 (2015), pp. 744-751
[45]
CK Svensson, MN Woodruff, JG Baxter, D. Lalka.
Free Drug Concentration Monitoring in Clinical Practice Rationale and Current Status.
Clin Pharmacokinet, 11 (1986), pp. 450-469
[46]
T Fournier, N Medjoubi, D. Porquet.
Alpha-1-acid glycoprotein.
Biochim Biophys Acta, 1482 (2000), pp. 157-171
[47]
F Ceciliani, C. Lecchi.
The Immune Functions of α 1 Acid Glycoprotein.
Curr Protein Pept Sci, 20 (2019), pp. 505-524
[48]
SA Smith, NJ. Waters.
Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Considerations for Drugs Binding to Alpha-1-Acid Glycoprotein.
[49]
ZF Xia, MI Coolbaugh, F He, DN Herndon, J. Papaconstantinou.
The effects of burn injury on the acute phase response.
[50]
Z Xia, G Wang, S Ge, J. Tian.
Alpha 1-antitrypsin and alpha 1-acid glycoprotein reduce the sensitivity of human dermal fibroblast to endotoxin.
Chin J Traumatol, 4 (2001), pp. 199-203
[51]
RA Zeineh, JC. Kukral.
The turnover rate of orosomucoid in burned patients.
[52]
PL. Bonate.
Pathophysiology and Pharmacokinetics Following Burn Injury.
Clin Pharmacokinet., 18 (1990), pp. 118-130
Copyright © 2024. HCFMUSP
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos