metricas
covid
Buscar en
Clinics
Toda la web
Inicio Clinics Chloroquine diphosphate: a risk factor for herpes zoster in patients with dermat...
Información de la revista
Vol. 68. Núm. 5.
Páginas 621-627 (mayo 2013)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Visitas
648
Vol. 68. Núm. 5.
Páginas 621-627 (mayo 2013)
CLINICAL SCIENCE
Open Access
Chloroquine diphosphate: a risk factor for herpes zoster in patients with dermatomyositis/polymyositis
Visitas
648
Gilmara Franco da Cunha, Fernando Henrique Carlos de Souza, Maurício Levy-Neto, Samuel Katsuyuki Shinjo
Autor para correspondencia
samuel.shinjo@gmail.com

Tel.: 55 11 3061-7176
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Rheumatology, São Paulo/SP, Brazil
Este artículo ha recibido

Under a Creative Commons license
Información del artículo
Resumen
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
OBJECTIVES

Herpes zoster has been widely described in the context of different systemic autoimmune diseases but not dermatomyositis/polymyositis. Therefore, we analyzed the prevalence, risk factors and herpes zoster outcomes in this population.

METHOD

A retrospective cohort study of herpes zoster infections in dermatomyositis/polymyositis patients was performed. The patients were followed at a tertiary center from 1991 to 2012. For the control group, each patient with herpes zoster was paired with two patients without herpes zoster. Patients were matched by gender and the type of myositis, age at myositis onset and disease duration.

RESULTS

Of 230 patients, 24 (10.4%) had a histories of herpes zoster (19 with dermatomyositis and five with polymyositis, two-thirds female). The mean age of the patients with herpes zoster was 44.6±16.8 years. No difference between the groups was found regarding cumulative clinical manifestations. Disease activity, autoantibody, muscle and leukogram parameters were also comparable between the groups. No differences in immunosuppressive (alone or in association with other immunosuppressive therapies) or glucocorticoid (current use, medium dose and cumulative dose in the last two months) therapies were found between patients with and without herpes zoster. However, a higher proportion of patients in the herpes zoster group received chloroquine diphosphate compared to the control group. All of the patients received acyclovir; 58.3% of patients had postherpetic neuralgia and no cases of recurrence were reported. Furthermore, individuals who were taking high prednisone doses at the time of the herpes zoster diagnosis had reduced levels of postherpetic neuralgia.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that chloroquine diphosphate could predispose patients with dermatomyositis/polymyositis to developing herpes zoster, particularly women and dermatomyositis patients.

KEYWORDS:
Antimalarial
Chloroquine Diphosphate
Dermatomyositis
Herpes Zoster
Inflammatory Myopathies
Polymyositis
Risk Factors
Texto completo
INTRODUCTION

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies encompass a heterogeneous group of systemic autoimmune diseases, including polymyositis (PM), which is characterized by symmetrical proximal and progressive muscle weakness of the limbs and dermatomyositis (DM), which, in addition to muscle involvement, includes skin abnormalities, such as heliotrope and Gottron's papules (1,2).

Viral infections, such as herpes zoster (HZ), have been increasingly reported in individuals with systemic autoimmune diseases. Among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, for instance, there is an HZ prevalence of 4.5% (3) and an incidence of 6.4–58.7 events/1,000 patient-years (3,4). Corticosteroids (3) and immunosuppressive agents (46), disease activity (58) and the presence of anti-Sm autoantibodies (8) number among the possible risk factors for HZ in this population. The incidence of HZ in rheumatoid arthritis is 9.96 cases/1,000 patient-years (9), and the risk factors in this cohort include older age (>45 years old), the presence of cancer, chronic lung disease, corticosteroid usage (10), exposure to immunosuppressive (10) and immunobiological therapies (11) and immune system dysregulation (12).

Through a few epidemiological studies, HZ in DM/PM has been investigated within the context of other opportunist infections or by examining a few myositis cases with HZ (1315). Thus, Fardet et al. (13) analyzed the incidence, risk factors, and severity of HZ in 121 patients with DM. However, these authors evaluated HZ and herpes simplex in DM patients with and without malignancy. Marie et al. (14) assessed several opportunistic and severe infections in 279 patients with DM/PM for a period of 13 years, but they found only three cases of HZ. Nagaoka et al. (15) analyzed the incidence of HZ in 22 patients with DM/PM over a period of 10 years. Five patients had histories of this viral infection, which predominantly occurred in the remission stage of the disease, showing no relationship with drug therapies.

Due to the dearth of publications on the topic, the aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence, risk factors and outcomes of HZ in our cohort of DM/PM patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODSStudy population, clinical assessment and data collection

Between January 1991 and January 2012, 230 consecutive patients with DM or PM and who fulfilled at least four of the five Bohan and Peter (2) criteria were followed at a tertiary hospital. Twenty-four subjects (10.4%) in this group had histories of HZ. Of the remaining patients without HZ, a control group of 48 patients (two controls for every HZ patient) was formed and matched by gender, disease type (DM or PM), age at the onset of myositis and disease duration. The study was approved by the local Research Ethics Committee.

Demographics, drug therapy and clinical and laboratory data were retrospectively obtained through a systematic review of all patient medical records. Drug therapy and laboratory data were based on the time of the DM/PM diagnosis and the season in which the HZ event occurred, while the clinical manifestations considered were those presenting during the follow-up of these patients.

Constitutional symptoms, skin changes (e.g., heliotrope, Gottron's papules, ulcers, photosensitive, calcinosis, and vasculitis), joint involvement (arthralgia and/or arthritis), and gastrointestinal (dysphagia) and respiratory (dyspnea on moderate exertion) manifestations were analyzed.

Creatine kinase (normal range 24–173 IU/L) and aldolase (1.0–7.5 IU/L) were determined using an automated kinetic assay. Leukocyte count, lactate dehydrogenase, alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase were also assessed. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein levels were evaluated using the Westergren and nephelometry methods, respectively. Autoantibodies against cellular components were determined with indirect immunofluorescence using Hep-2 cells as the substrate. Autoantibody anti-Jo-1 was determined using the Western blotting method.

All of the patients were first started on corticosteroids (prednisone 1 mg/kg/day, administered orally), which were tapered gradually according to clinical and laboratory stability. In cases of high disease severity (dysphagia with risk of aspiration pneumonia, cutaneous vasculitis, or being refractory to oral corticosteroids), intravenous corticosteroids were administered (methyl prednisolone 1 g/day for three consecutive days). The following drugs were used alone or in combination for corticosteroid sparing: azathioprine (2–3 mg/kg/day), methotrexate (20–25 mg/week), cyclosporine (2–3 mg/kg/day), mycophenolate mofetil (2–3 g/day), leflunomide (20 mg/day), cyclophosphamide (0.5–1.0 g/m2 of body surface), intravenous human immunoglobulin (1 g/kg/day for two consecutive days) and chloroquine diphosphate (3–4 mg/kg/day).

Herpes zoster information

HZ infection was clinically defined by the appearance of the typical vesicular eruption distributed in a dermatome. The potential complications of HZ, which were listed on the protocol form, included postherpetic neuralgia (persistence of pain for more than one month after the disappearance of the rash) (16) and cutaneous dissemination (vesicular lesions outside the primary and adjacent dermatomes) (17). All of the lesions were initially evaluated by rheumatologists and then by dermatologists from our service.

The disease status at the time of the HZ diagnosis was defined as (a) partial clinical response (evidence of disease activity within the last 6 months of disease); (b) complete clinical response (6-month continuous period with no evidence of disease activity while still receiving myositis therapy); and (c) clinical remission (6-month continuous period with no evidence of disease activity and no myositis therapy) (17). Disease activity was defined as an increase in muscle enzyme sera levels, with clinical evidence of limb muscle weakness at two consecutive medical evaluations.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables are expressed as the means±standard deviations (SDs), as medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs), or as percentages for categorical variables. Student's t-test or the Mann-Whitney U-test for continuous variables was employed to evaluate the differences between the DM/PM groups. The 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated using binomial distribution. All of the variables that significantly differed statistically in the univariable analysis (comparison between patients with and without HZ episodes or with and without neurological sequelae) were selected for adjustment. The sex- and age-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were calculated using an unconditional logistic model, and p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTSDemographic and clinical features of patients with and without herpes zoster

Over a 21-year follow-up period, 24 (10.4%) of 230 patients had HZ (19 DM cases and 5 PM cases, 3.8:1), and two-thirds were female. The clinical and demographic features of these patients are shown in Table 1. In general, these characteristics were comparable between the groups with and without HZ, except for a higher prevalence of DM in the group with HZ compared to the patients without HZ (p = 0.046).

Table 1.

Comparison of the general demographic and clinical features of the dermatomyositis/polymyositis patients with and without herpes zoster.

  HZ (+)  HZ (−)  p-value 
  (n = 24)  (n = 206)   
DM:PM ratio  19:5  113:87  0.046 
Sex at disease onset ± SD (years)  43.8±16.8  42.2±14.2  0.123 
Gender - female (%)  7 (71)  157 (97)  1.000 
Time between disease diagnosis and symptoms (IQR) (mo)  5.0 (2.0–9.0)  3.0 (2.0–6.0)  0.264 
Cumulative clinical manifestations       
Constitutional symptoms (%)  15 (63)  105 (51)  0.521 
Bedrest (%)  3 (13)  55 (27)  0.212 
Articular: arthralgia/arthritis (%)  12 (50)  88 (43)  0.521 
Gastrointestinal tract: dysphagia (%)  8 (34)  74 (36)  1.000 
Pulmonary: dyspnea (%)  5 (21)  56 (27)  0.766 

DM: dermatomyositis; HZ: herpes zoster; IQR: interquartile range; PM: polymyositis; SD: standard deviation.

The mean age of the patients with HZ was 44.6±16.8 years (range 21 to 84 years). Demographic and clinical variables of the 24 patients in the HZ group were compared with those of the 48 randomly selected and matched patients without HZ, as shown in Table 2. No differences were detected between the two groups regarding the cumulative clinical manifestations (Table 2). Furthermore, the two groups were comparable in terms of current disease status, laboratory parameters (initial and current) and autoantibodies (Table 3).

Table 2.

Demographic and clinical features of selected patients with dermatomyositis/polymyositis according to the presence of herpes zoster.

  HZ (+)  HZ (−)  p-value 
  (n = 24)  (n = 48)   
DM: PM ratio  19:5  38:10  1.000 
Age at disease onset ± SD (years)  43.8±16.8  44.1±15.3  0.935 
Gender - female (%)  7 (71)  14 (71)  1.000 
Time between disease diagnosis and symptoms (IQR) (mo)  5.0 (2.0–9.0)  3.0 (3.0–8.5)0.855 
Time between HZ and disease diagnosis (IQR) (mo)  13.0 (6.0–31.0)  9.5 (5.9–19.0)  0.190 
Cumulative clinical manifestations       
Constitutional symptoms (%)  15 (63)  24 (50)  0.393 
Bedrest (%)  3 (13)  11 (23)  0.290 
Cutaneous       
Heliotrope (%)  19 (79)  33 (69)  0.158 
Gottron's papules (%)  19 (79)  34 (71)  1.000 
Vasculitis (%)  6 (25)  6 (13)  0.325 
Calcinosis (%)  3 (13)  1 (2)  0.140 
Ulcers (%)  3 (13)  6 (13)  0.269 
Photosensitive (%)  12 (50)  20 (42)  1.000 
Articular: arthralgia/arthritis (%)  12 (50)  16 (33)  0.171 
Gastrointestinal tract: dysphagia (%)  8 (34)  22 (46)  0.310 
Pulmonary: dyspnea (%)  5 (21)  12 (25)  0.766 

DM: dermatomyositis; HZ: herpes zoster; IQR: interquartile range; PM: polymyositis; SD: standard deviation.

Comparable period for patients who developed herpes zoster.

Table 3.

Disease status and laboratory features of patients with dermatomyositis/polymyositis according to the presence of herpes zoster.

  HZ (+)  HZ (−)  p-value 
  (n = 24)  (n = 48)   
Disease status       
Complete clinical response  2 (8)  6 (13)  0.596 
Partial clinical response  20 (83)  37 (77)  0.538 
Clinical remission  2 (8)  7 (15)  0.450 
Laboratory features       
Creatine kinase (U/L)       
At diagnosis  761.1 (254.0–4300.0)  3031.0 (148.0–9015.0)  0.449 
At HZ event  178.5 (82.5–672.0)  14.0 (10.5–60.8)0.304 
Aldolase (U/L)       
At diagnosis  14.0 (7.5–49.5)  14.0 (10.5–60.8)  0.583 
At HZ event  6.3 (4.6–9.9)  5.6 (4.9–8.2)0.594 
Aspartate aminotransferase (U/L)       
At diagnosis  86.5 (42.0–238.0)  82.0 (39.0–184.0)  0.898 
At HZ event  45.9±46.5  51.9±59.20.641 
Alanine aminotransferase (U/L)       
At diagnosis  63.5 (32.0–120.0)  63.0 (29.0–177.0)  0.685 
At HZ event  42.4±36.4  64.5±118.30.241 
Lactate dehydrogenase (U/L)       
At diagnosis  639.0 (390.0–1506.0)  714.0 (456.0–1109.0)  0.605 
At HZ event  813.0 (386.5–736.0)  576.0 (450.0–623.0)0.926 
At HZ event       
Leukocytes (mm37689.9±3662.7  7161.5±3129.00.550 
Neutrophils (mm35875.0±3112.1  4874.3±2,759.00.193 
Lymphocytes (mm31554.2±960.5  1523.6±955.80.900 
C-reactive protein (mg/dL)  4.9 (1.5–14.7)  2.1 (1.0–9.3)0.080 
ESR (mm/1st hour)  18.4±12.2  21.4±19.60.448 
Antinuclear factor (%)  15 (63)  28 (58)  0.734 
Anti-Jo-1 antibody (%)  3 (13)  1 (2)  0.069 

ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate; HZ: herpes zoster; SD: standard deviation.

Comparable period for patients who developed herpes zoster. Results expressed as the means ± standard deviation or as median (interquartile ratios).

All of the HZ patients initially received intravenous acyclovir (30 mg/kg/day).

There was no difference between DM/PM with and without HZ with regard to glucocorticoid therapy (current use, medium dose and cumulative dose over the two previous months). Similarly, immunosuppressive therapy use was similar in both groups (Table 4). However, the patients using chloroquine diphosphate had a 5.98-fold (95% CI, 1.66–22.26) greater risk of developing HZ compared to the patients who did not receive chloroquine diphosphate treatment.

Table 4.

Drug use features of patients with dermatomyositis/polymyositis according to the presence of herpes zoster.

  HZ (+)  HZ (−)  p-value 
  (n = 24)  (n = 48)   
Corticosteroid       
Using (%)  21 (87.5)  37 (77.1)  0.292 
Mean±SD (mg/day)  26.5±20.0  30.3±27.1  0.515 
≥20 mg/day  14 (58.3)  26 (54.2)  0.805 
Cumulative dose∗ (g)  1.5±1.2  1.5±1.4  0.928 
Immunosuppressives       
Azathioprine (%)  12 (50.0)  18 (37.5)  0.310 
Mean±SD (mg/kg/day)  2.4±0.2  2.4±0.3  0.721 
Methotrexate (%)  6 (25.0)  19 (39.6)  0.220 
Mean±SD (mg/week)  23.0±2.7  22.5±2.6  0.727 
Cyclosporine (%)  1 (4.2)  1 (2.1)  0.612 
Mean±SD (mg/kg/day)  2.0  2.0  1.000 
IVIG (%)  1 (4.2)  3 (6.3)  0.716 
Mean±SD (g/kg)  2.0  2.0  1.000 
Leflunomide (%)  1 (4.2)  0.154 
Mean±SD (mg/day)  20.0  –  – 
Cyclophosphamide (%)  4 (4.2)  2 (2.1)  0.612 
Mean±SD (g/m2 body surface)  0.8±0.2  0.7±0.3  0.795 
Mycophenolate mofetil (%)  1 (4.2)  0.154 
Mean±SD (g/day)  3.0  –  – 
Chloroquine diphosphate (%)  9 (37.5)  5 (10.4)  0.006 
Mean±SD (mg/day)  3.2±0.2  3.3±0.3  0.814 
Corticosteroid + immunosuppressive (%)       
Using (%)  17 (70.8)  31 (64.6)  0.592 
Number of immunosuppressives       
One (%)  16 (66.7)  28 (58.3)  0.494 
Two (%)  1 (4.2)  9 (18.8)  0.154 
Three (%)  1(4.2)  0.131 

HZ: herpes zoster; IVIG: intravenous immunoglobulin; SD: standard deviation;

Cumulative dose: past two months.

Clinical evaluation and dermatome locations of herpes zoster

Table 5 shows the dermatome locations of HZ, as well as the clinical evaluations. Six cases had simultaneous involvement of two dermatomes. Neurological sequelae occurred in 14 (58.3%) of 24 patients, and no cases of HZ recurrence were reported. The duration of the neurological symptoms was 8.2±4.4 years.

Table 5.

Dermatomes and outcomes of herpes zoster.

Case  Localization  HZ evaluation with neurological sequelae 
Left dorsal area  Yes 
Nose, left lower limb (L5)  No 
Face, left lower limb (L5)  No 
Thoracic area, left upper limb  No 
Lower right limb (tibial nerve)  Yes 
Left dorsal (T11)  Yes 
Left upper limb  Yes 
Dorsal area  Yes 
Left upper limb  Yes 
10  Dorsal area  No 
11  Dorsal area  No 
12  Dorsal area, left lower limb  Yes 
13  Right dorsal area (T11)  Yes 
14  Left thoracic area  Yes 
15  Left thoracic area, abdomen  Yes 
16  Trigeminal nerve  Yes 
17  Right lower limb  No 
18  Gluteus (S1 and S2)  No 
19  Left thoracic area  Yes 
20  Left thoracic area  Yes 
21  Left lower limb (S1)  No 
22  Trunk  No 
23  Right thoracic area  No 
24  Left thoracic area (T4)  Yes 

HZ: herpes zoster.

The demographics, disease status and clinical and laboratory features were comparable in the patients with and without postherpetic neuralgia. However, the latter group used a higher prednisone dose at the time of the HZ diagnosis (median 40 mg/day [range 5-70]) than the former group (median 15 mg/day [range 0–40], p = 0.018, with OR of 0.93 and 95% CI of 0.86–0.99).

DISCUSSION

The present study identified chloroquine diphosphate as the primary risk factor for HZ in DM/PM. In our population, we noted a high HZ prevalence that predominantly affected women and individuals with DM.

An important aspect of this retrospective study's design was its large cohort of HZ cases and associated risk factors in the patients with DM and PM, which are both considered rare systemic autoimmune diseases. Additionally, the study and control groups were matched by age because there is a known HZ cluster disparity between young and elderly subjects. Moreover, gender, disease type (DM or PM), age at diagnosis and disease duration were also controlled for by sample matching to avoid a confounding bias.

Despite enrolling large samples, many authors have found few HZ cases in their DM/PM populations. Notably, Marie et al. (14) identified only three individuals with HZ in 279 cases and Yu et al. (18) detected two subjects with HZ among 192 cases of DM/PM, whereas Fardet et al. (13) found 16 HZ cases among 121 DM patients. In the present study, we evaluated 24 (10.4%) HZ cases among 230 patients who were clinically diagnosed with DM/PM over a 21-year follow-up period. Therefore, a considerable number of infected patients were identified in this population.

Based on other systemic autoimmune diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis, the major risk factors for developing HZ include older age, use of corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents, disease activity, female sex, cancer, lung disease and impaired cellular immunity (312,1921).

In our population, HZ predominantly affected adults with a mean age of 44 years (range 21 to 84 years), with no tendency toward affecting older individuals. Moreover, to avoid analysis bias, individuals with neoplasias were excluded.

In contrast with other systemic autoimmune diseases, in which impaired cellular immunity is considered a risk factor for HZ development (12), humoral immunity function might be considered relevant in inflammatory myopathies because the prevalence of HZ was higher in the DM patients compared to the PM patients. From an immunopathological standpoint, CD8 (+) lymphocyte and macrophage infiltrations are primarily found in PM muscle fibers (22), whereas in DM, B cells play important roles in the pathogenesis of the disease through the presence of autoantibodies, immune complex deposition in the dermoepidermal junction of skin lesions and the presence of B cells in inflamed muscles and perivascular areas (23,24). Additionally, deposition of complement and immunoglobulin in the perifascicular endothelium can lead to ischemia and muscle atrophy, underlining the importance of humoral immunity (25). Thus, disturbances in humoral immunity might increase HZ reactivation, as we found a higher prevalence of HZ in the DM patients compared to the PM patients.

Nagaoka et al. (15) analyzed five HZ cases among 22 DM/PM patients and noted that the infection affected more patients without disease activity; they found no correlation over time with corticosteroid use. Our results showed that HZ prevalence was independent of disease status and clinical and laboratory features, including cutaneous manifestations. Moreover, daily and/or cumulative dosages of corticosteroid and/or intravenous pulse methylprednisolone did not increase the risk for HZ development in our population. Likewise, using immunosuppressive therapy (methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, leflunomide and cyclophosphamide)—either alone or in combination—was not associated with HZ.

However, patients using chloroquine diphosphate had a fivefold greater risk of developing HZ compared to patients not receiving chloroquine diphosphate treatment. Chloroquine diphosphate and its analogue, hydroxychloroquine, are used to treat various rheumatic diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, sarcoidosis, dermatomyositis, Sjögren's syndrome, chronic juvenile arthritis and psoriatic arthritis; these drugs offer clinical benefits with acceptable safety profiles (2629). Further, these drugs have also been used to treat inflammatory myopathies, particularly for the cutaneous symptoms of DM (3034).

Chloroquine might also have antiviral activity (35). As a lysosomotropic weak base, it impairs the replication of some viruses by reducing the efficiency of endosome-mediated virus entry or by inhibiting low-pH–dependent proteases in trans-Golgi vesicles (35). Its antiviral activity against the human immunodeficiency virus (36) and the SARS coronavirus has also been demonstrated (37,38). However, chloroquine has also been shown to increase symptom severity and mortality (e.g., following Semliki Forest virus and encephalomyocarditis virus infection, as well as increasing viral titers in various organs) (39). Our results clearly showed that chloroquine was a risk factor for HZ development in subjects with DM/PM, independent of disease status, therapy and demographic features.

Regarding the clinical evaluation, at least half of our patients had neurological sequelae. Six patients had simultaneous involvement of two dermatomes, while no cases of HZ recurrence were reported. Postherpetic neuralgia can result in severe pain such that patients are often unable to wear clothing that comes in contact with the lesions or be exposed to wind because of high skin sensitivity in regions such as the thorax and face. The incidence of postherpetic neuralgia rises from 10% among individuals of all ages to as high as 40% among those aged 50 years and older (40). A large prospective study identified four independent predictors of postherpetic neuralgia: older age, severe, acute pain, severe rash and a shorter duration of rash before consultation (41). Although controversial, short-term use of corticosteroids can reduce the pain severity and improve patient quality of life in the acute phase (42). Note that high prednisone doses at the time of HZ diagnosis were found to decrease the incidence of postherpetic neuralgia in our patients.

In conclusion, our data showed a high prevalence of HZ in the DM/PM population studied and confirmed that chloroquine diphosphate is a risk factor for HZ development in this population, particularly women and DM patients. Further research is necessary to evaluate the possible molecular mechanism underlying the higher HZ prevalence in DM subjects compared to PM patient populations.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Cunha GF participated in the data collection and writing of the manuscript. Souza FH participated in the writing of the manuscript. Levy-Neto M participated in the manuscript revision. Shinjo SK contributed to the study design and participated in the data collection and manuscript revision.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was partially supported by the Federico Foundation.

REFERENCES
[1]
JP Callen .
Dermatomyositis.
Dermatological signs of internal disease, 2nd ed., pp. 13-20
[2]
A Bohan , JB Peter .
Polymyositis and dermatomyositis (first of two parts).
N Engl J Med, 292 (1975), pp. 344-347
[3]
I Moga , F Formiga , R Canet , M Pac , F Mitjavila , R Pujol .
Herpes zoster vírus infection in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.
Rev Clin Esp, (1995), pp. 530-533
[4]
EF Borba , AC Ribeiro , P Martin , LP Costa , LK Guedes , E Bonfa .
Incidence, risk factors, and outcome of herpes zoster in systemic lupus erythematosus.
J Clin Rheumatol, 16 (2010), pp. 119-122
[5]
S Manzi , LH Kuller , J Kutzer , GJ Pazin , J Sinacore , TA Medsger Jr , et al.
Herpes zoster in systemic lupus erythematosus.
J Rheumatol, 22 (1995), pp. 1254-1258
[6]
LE Kahl .
Herpes zoster infections in systemic lupus erythematosus: risk factors and outcome.
J Rheumatol, 21 (1994), pp. 84-86
[7]
PP Lee , TL Lee , MH Ho , WH Wong , YL Lau .
Herpes zoster in juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosus incidence, clinical characteristics and risk factors.
Pediatr Infect Dis J, 25 (2006), pp. 728-732
[8]
TY Kang , HS Lee , TH Kim , JB Jun , DH Yoo .
Clinical and genetic risk factors of herpes zoster in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.
Rheumatol Int, 25 (2005), pp. 97-102
[9]
JR McDonald , AL Zeringue , L Captan , P Ranganathan , H Xian , TE Burroughs , et al.
Herpes zoster risk factors in a national cohort of veterans with rheumatoid arthritis.
Clin Infect Dis, 48 (2009), pp. 1164-1171
[10]
AL Smitten , HK Choi , MC Hochberg , S Suissa , TA Simon , MA Testa , et al.
The risk of herpes zoster in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the United States and the United Kingdom.
Arthritis Rheum, 57 (2007), pp. 1431-1438
[11]
A Strangfeld , J Listing , P Herzer , A Liebhaber , K Rockwitz , C Richter , et al.
Risk of herpes zoster in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with anti-TNF-alpha agents.
JAMA, 301 (2009), pp. 737-744
[12]
K Koetz , E Bryl , K Spickschen , WM O'Fallon , JJ Goronzy , CM Weyand .
T cell homeostasis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 97 (2000), pp. 9203-9208
[13]
L Fardet , M Rybojad , M Gain , A Kettaneh , P Cherin , H Bachelez , et al.
Incidence, risk factors, and severity of herpes virus infections in a cohort of 121 patients with primary dermatomyositis and dermatomyositis associated with a malignant neoplasm.
Arch Dermatol, 145 (2009), pp. 889-893
[14]
I Marie , JF Ménard , E Hachulla , P Chérin , O Benveniste , K Tiev , et al.
Infectious complications in polymyositis and dermatomyositis: a series of 279 patients.
Semin Arthritis Rheum, 41 (2011), pp. 48-60
[15]
S Nagaoka , K Tani , Y Ishigatsubo , J Chiba , K Matsunaga , M Narita , et al.
Herpes zoster in patients with dermatomyositis-polymyositis.
Kansenshogaku Zasshi, 64 (1990), pp. 1394-1399
[16]
RG Kost , SE Straus .
Post herpetic neuralgia-pathogenesis, treatment, and prevention.
N Engl J Med, 335 (1996), pp. 32-42
[17]
ML McCrary , J Severson , SK Tyring .
Varicella zoster virus.
J Am Acad Dermatol, 41 (1999), pp. 1-14
[18]
KH Yu , YJ Wu , CF Kuo , LC See , YM Shen , HC Chang , et al.
Survival analysis of patients with dermatomyositis and polymyositis: analysis of 192 Chinese cases.
Clin Rheumatol, 30 (2011), pp. 1595-1601
[19]
A Arvin .
Aging, immunity, and the varicella-zoster virus.
N Engl J Med, 352 (2005), pp. 2266-2267
[20]
SL Thomas , AJ Hall .
What does epidemiology tell us about risk factors for herpes zoster.
Lancet Infect Dis, 4 (2004), pp. 26-33
[21]
F Wolfe , K Michaud , EF Chakravarty .
Rates and predictors of herpes zoster in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and non-inflammatory musculoskeletal disorders.
Rheumatology, 45 (2006), pp. 1370-1375
[22]
JC Botet , JM Grau , J Casademont , A Urbano-Marquez , C Rozman .
Characterization of mononuclear exudates in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.
Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol, 412 (1988), pp. 371-374
[23]
AM Emslie-Smith , AG Engel .
Microvascular changes in early and advanced dermatomyositis: a quantitative study.
Ann Neurol, 27 (1990), pp. 343-356
[24]
AG Engel , K Arahata .
Mononuclear cells in myopathies: quantitation of functionally distinct subsets, recognition of antigen specific cell-mediated cytotoxicity in some diseases, and implications for the pathogenesis of the different inflammatory myopathies.
Hum Pathol, 17 (1986), pp. 704-721
[25]
EH Noss , DL Hausner-Sypek , M Weinblatt .
Rituximab as therapy for refractory polymyositis and dermatomyositis.
J Rheumatol, 33 (2006), pp. 1021-1026
[26]
RI Fox , R Dixon , V Guarrasi , S Krubel .
Treatment of primary Sjögren's syndrome with hydroxychloroquine: a retrospective, open-label study.
Lupus, 5 (1996), pp. S31-S36
[27]
IM Meinao , EI Sato , LEC Andrade , MB Ferraz , E Atra .
Controlled trial with chloroquine diphosphate in systemic lupus erythematosus.
[28]
NY Olson , CB Lindsley .
Adjunctive use of hydroxychloroquine in childhood dermatomyositis.
J Rheumatol, 16 (1986), pp. 1545-1547
[29]
RI Ryes .
Antimalarial drugs in the treatment of rheumatological diseases.
Br J Rheumatol, 36 (1997), pp. 799-805
[30]
TY Woo , JP Callen , JJ Voorhees , DR Bickers , R Hanno , C Hawkins .
Cutaneous lesions of dermatomyositis are improved by hydroxychloroquine.
J Am Acad Dermatol, 10 (1984), pp. 592-600
[31]
GC Ang , VP Werth .
Combination antimalarials in the treatment of cutaneous dermatomyositis.
A Retrospective Study. Arch Dermatol, 141 (2005), pp. 855-859
[32]
MT Pelle , JP Callen .
Adverse cutaneous reactions to hydroxychloroquine are more common in patients with dermatomyositis than in patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus.
Arch Dermatol, 138 (2002), pp. 1231-1233
[33]
TY Woo , JP Callen , JJ Voorhees , DR Bickers , R Hanno , C Hawkins .
Cutaneous lesions of dermatomyositis are improved by hydroxychloroquine.
J Am Acad Dermatol, 10 (1984), pp. 592-600
[34]
JO Sato , AM Sallum , VP Ferriani , R Marini , SB Sacchetti , EM Okuda , et al.
Rheumatology Committee of the São Paulo Paediatrics Society.
A Brazilian registry of juvenile dermatomyositis: onset features and classification of 189 cases. Clin Exp Rheumatol, 27 (2009), pp. 1031-1038
[35]
A Savirno , JR Boelaert , A Cassone , G Majori , R Cauda .
Effects of chloroquine on viral infections: an old drug against today's diseases.
Lancet Infect Dis, 3 (2003), pp. 772-777
[36]
JR Boelaert , J Piette , K Sperber .
The potential place of chloroquine in the treatment of HIV-1-infected patients.
J Clin Virol, 20 (2001), pp. 137-140
[37]
E Keyaerts , L Vijgen , P Maes , J Neyts , M Van Ranst .
In vitro inhibition of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus by chloroquine.
Biochem Biophys Res Comm, 323 (2004), pp. 264-268
[38]
MJ Vincent , E Bergeron , S Benjannet , BR Erickson , PE Rollin , TG Ksiazek , al Seidah , et al.
Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.
[39]
GS Sidhu , JP Gaddipati , SN Vogel , RK Maheshwari .
Acceleraton of viral replication and up-regulation of cytokine levels by antimalarials: implications in malaria-endemic areas.
Am J Trop Med Hyg, 61 (1999), pp. 180-186
[40]
RH Dworkin , KE Schmader .
The epidemiology and natural history of herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia.
Herpes zoster and post - herpetic neuralgia, pp. 39-64
[41]
W Opstelten , NPA Zuithoff , GA van Essen , AM van Loon , AJ van Wijck , CJ Kalkman , et al.
Predicting postherpetic neuralgia in elderly primary care patients with herpes zoster: prospective prognostic study.
[42]
ME Ernst , JA Santee , TB Klepser .
Oral corticosteroids for pain associated with herpes zoster.
Ann Pharmacother, 32 (1998), pp. 1099-1103

No potential conflict of interest was reported.

Copyright © 2013. CLINICS
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos