metricas
covid
Buscar en
Cirugía Española
Toda la web
Inicio Cirugía Española Estomas de protección en cirugía colorrectal. ¿Cuándo y cómo realizarlos?
Información de la revista
Vol. 74. Núm. 5.
Páginas 251-255 (noviembre 2003)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 74. Núm. 5.
Páginas 251-255 (noviembre 2003)
Acceso a texto completo
Estomas de protección en cirugía colorrectal. ¿Cuándo y cómo realizarlos?
Protective stomas in colorectal surgery. When and how should they be performed?
Visitas
21019
Eduardo García-Granero1, Juan García-Armengol, Stephanie García-Botello, Salvador Lledó
Unidad de Coloproctología. Servicio de Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo. Hospital Clínico. Universidad de Valencia. Valencia. España
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Resumen
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Resumen

En los últimos años, el empleo de estomas de protección en cirugía colorrectal se ha incrementado, y tiene fundamentalmente tres grandes indicaciones: 1) traumatismos ano-recto-cólicos graves; 2) enfermedad de Crohn con importante afectación anorrectal y perineal, y 3) prevención de complicaciones derivadas del fracaso anastomótico, fundamentalmente tras resección anterior baja por neoplasia de recto y tras proctocolectomía restauradora por colitis ulcerosa o poliposis cólica familiar.

En cuanto al tipo de estoma a realizar, en los casos de enfermedad o traumatismo anorrectal, lo habitual será realizar una sigmoidostomía en asa, por lo que la derivación se sitúa inmediatamente proximal a la zona lesionada. En los casos de enfermedades y procedimientos en el colon izquierdo o recto, permanece la controversia entre realizar una ileostomía en asa o una colostomía transversa en asa, por lo que se debe analizar la facilidad en la confección y cierre, y su posible morbilidad, sin olvidar la percepción del paciente con respecto a su manejo.

Palabras clave:
Estoma de protección
Ileostomía
Colostomía

In the last few years, the use of protective stomas in colorectal surgery has increased. This type of surgery has three main indications: 1. Severe ano-rectocolonic injury. 2. Crohn’s disease with significant anorectal and perineal involvement. 3. Prevention of complications due to anastomotic failure, mainly after low anterior resection for rectal neoplasm and after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis or familial colic polyposis.

Concerning the type of stoma to construct, loop sigmoidostomy is usually performed in cases of anorectal disease or injury and consequently the diversion is located immediately proximal to the affected area. When the location is the left colon or rectum, the choice between loop ileostomy or loop transverse colostomy remains controversial and therefore the ease of construction and closure, as well as possible morbidity, should be analyzed. Patients’ perceptions should also be taken into consideration.

Key words:
Protective stoma
Ileostomy
Colostomy
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
R. Alós.
Traumatismos ano-recto-cólicos..
pp. 423-439
[2.]
D.W. Dietz, J.W. Milsom, V.W. Fazio.
Crohn’s anorectal disease..
pp. 394-408
[3.]
A. Vignali, V.W. Fazio, I.C. Lavery, J.W. Milsom, J.M. Church, T.L. Hull, et al.
Factors associated with the ocurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomosis: a review of 1014 patients.
J Am Coll Surg, 185 (1997), pp. 105-113
[4.]
E. Rullier, C. Laurent, J.L. Garrelon, P. Michel, J. Saric, M. Parneix.
Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer.
[5.]
A.M. Akyol, J.R. McGregor, D.J. Galloway, G.D. Murray, W.D. George.
Anastomotic leaks in colorectal cancer surgery: a risk factor for recurrence?.
Int J Colorectal Dis, 6 (1991), pp. 179-183
[6.]
S. Petersen, M. Freitag, G. Hellmich, K. Ludwig.
Anastomotic leakage: impact on local recurrence and survival in surgery of colorectal cancer.
Int J Colorectal Dis, 13 (1998), pp. 160-163
[7.]
H. Graffner, P. Fredlund, S-A. Olsson, J. Oscarson, B-G. Peterson.
Protective colostomy in low anterior resection of the rectum using the EEA stapling instrument: a randomized study.
Dis Colon Rectum, 26 (1983), pp. 87-90
[8.]
T.E. Pakkastie, P.E. Luukkonen, H.J. Jarvinen.
A randomised study of colostomies in low colorectal anastomoses.
Eur J Surg, 163 (1997), pp. 929-933
[9.]
N. Dehni, R.D. Schlegel, C. Cunningham, M. Guiguet, E. Tiret, R. Parc.
Influence of a defunctioning stoma on leakage rates after low colorectal anastomosis and colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis.
Br J Surg, 85 (1998), pp. 1114-1117
[10.]
R.T. Poon, K.W. Chu, J.W. Ho, C.W. Chan, W.L. Law, J. Wong.
Prospective evaluation of selective defunctioning stoma for low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision.
World J Surg, 23 (1999), pp. 463-467
[11.]
W.I. Law, K.W. Chu, J.W. Ho, C.W. Chan.
Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision.
Am J Surg, 179 (2000), pp. 92-96
[12.]
F. Marusch, A. Koch, U. Schmidt, S. Geibler, H. Dralle, H-D. Saeger, et al.
Value of protective stoma in low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Dis Colon Rectum, 45 (2002), pp. 1164-1171
[13.]
J.A. Grabham, B.J. Moran, R.H. Lane.
Defunctioning colostomy for low anterior resection: a selective approach.
Br J Surg, 82 (1995), pp. 1331-1332
[14.]
N.D. Karanjia, A.P. Corder, P.J. Holdsworth, R.J. Heald.
Risk of peritonitis and fatal septicaemia and the need to defunction the low anastomosis.
Br J Surg, 78 (1991), pp. 196-198
[15.]
B.J. Moran, R.J. Heald.
Anastomotic leakage after colorectal anastomosis.
Semin Surg Oncol, 18 (2000), pp. 244-248
[16.]
J.T. Mäkelä, H. Kiviniemi, S. Laitinen.
Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after left-sided colorectal resection with rectal anastomosis.
Dis Colon Rectum, 46 (2003), pp. 653-660
[17.]
J.H. Pemberton, K.A. Kelly, R.W. Beart, R.R. Dozois, B.G. Wolff, D.M. Ilstrup.
Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis: longterm results.
Ann Surg, 206 (1987), pp. 504-513
[18.]
V.W. Fazio, Y. Ziv, J.M. Church, J.R. Oakley, I.C. Lavery, J.W. Milsom, et al.
Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis complications and function in 1005 patients.
Ann Surg, 222 (1995), pp. 120-127
[19.]
J.J. Tjandra, V.W. Fazio, J.W. Milsom, I.C. Lavery, J.R. Oakley, J.M. Fabre.
Omission of temporary diversion in restorative proctocolectomy: is it safe?.
Dis Colon Rectum, 36 (1993), pp. 1007-1014
[20.]
S. Galandiuk, B.G. Wolff, R.R. Dozois, R.W. Beart.
Ileal pouch anal anastomosis without ileostomy.
Dis Colon Rectum, 34 (1991), pp. 870-873
[21.]
S.P. Grabler, K.B. Hosie, M.R.B. Keighley.
Randomized trial of loop ileostomy in restorative proctocolectomy.
Br J Surg, 79 (1992), pp. 903-906
[22.]
S.R. Gorfine, I.M. Gelernt, J.J. Bauer, M.T. Harris, I. Kreel.
Restorative proctocolectomy without diverting ileostomy.
Dis Colon Rectum, 38 (1995), pp. 188-194
[23.]
M.E.R. Williamson, W.G. Lewis, P.M. Sagar, P.J. Holdsworth, D. Johnston.
One-stage restorative proctocolectomy without temporary ileostomy for ulcerative colitis.
Dis Colon Rectum, 40 (1997), pp. 1019-1022
[24.]
H.J. Sugerman, E.L. Sugerman, J.G. Meador, H.H. Newsome, J.M. Kellum, E.J. DeMaria.
Ileal pouch anal anastomosis without ileal diversion.
Ann Surg, 232 (2000), pp. 530-541
[25.]
P.M. Mowschenson, J.F. Critchlow, M.A. Peppercorn.
Ileoanal pouch operation. Long-term outcome with or without diverting ileostomy.
Arch Surg, 135 (2000), pp. 463-466
[26.]
K. Gullberg, L. Liljeqvist.
Stapled ileoanal pouches without loop ileostomy: a prospective study in 86 patients.
Int J Colorectal Dis, 16 (2001), pp. 221-227
[27.]
M.L. Prasad, R.K. Pearl, H. Abcarian.
End-loop colostomy.
Surg Gynecol Obstet, 158 (1984), pp. 381-382
[28.]
N.S. Williams, D.G. Nasmyth, D. Jones, A.H. Smith.
De-functioning stomas: a prospective controlled trial comparing loop ileostomy with loop transverse colostomy.
Br J Surg, 73 (1986), pp. 566-570
[29.]
G.A. Khoury, M.C. Lewis, L. Meleagros, A.A. Lewis.
Colostomy or ileostomy after colorectal anastomosis?: a randomised trial.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 69 (1987), pp. 5-7
[30.]
J. Rutegard, S. Dahlgren.
Transverse colostomy or loop ileostomy as diverting stoma in colorectal surgery.
Acta Chir Scand, 153 (1987), pp. 229-232
[31.]
A.W. Gooszen, R.H. Geelkerken, J. Hermans, M.B. Lagaay, H.G. Gooszen.
Temporary decompression after colorectal surgery: randomized comparison of loop ileostomy and loop colostomy.
[32.]
D.P. Edwards, A. Leppington-Clarke, R. Sexton, R.J. Heald, B.J. Moran.
Stoma-related complications are more frequent after transverse colostomy than loop ileostomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial.
[33.]
E. Rullier, N. LeToux, C.H. Laurent, J-L. Garrelon, M. Parneix, J. Saric.
Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for defunctioning low anastomosis during rectal cancer surgery.
World J Surg, 25 (2001), pp. 274-278
[34.]
Y. Sakai, H. Nelson, D. Larson, L. Maidl, T. Young-Fadok, D. Ilstrup.
Temporary transverse colostomy vs loop ileostomy in diversion. A case-matched study.
Arch Surg, 136 (2001), pp. 338-342
[35.]
S. Bhalerao, M.W. Scriven, A. da Silva.
Stoma related complications are more frequent after transverse colostomy than loop ileostomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial.
[36.]
W.L. Law, K.W. Chu, H.K. Choi.
Randomized clinical trial comparing loop ileostomy and loop transverse colostomy for faecal diversion following total mesorectal excision.
Copyright © 2003. Asociación Española de Cirujanos
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos

Quizás le interese:
10.1016/j.ciresp.2021.04.008
No mostrar más