metricas
covid
Buscar en
Journal of Innovation & Knowledge
Toda la web
Inicio Journal of Innovation & Knowledge Effect of supervisor-subordinate Guanxi on employees work behavior: An empirical...
Información de la revista
Vol. 8. Núm. 2.
(abril - junio 2023)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Visitas
880
Vol. 8. Núm. 2.
(abril - junio 2023)
Acceso a texto completo
Effect of supervisor-subordinate Guanxi on employees work behavior: An empirical dynamic framework
Visitas
880
Hira Salah ud din Khana, Yang Guangshengb,
Autor para correspondencia
gsyang@zafu.edu.cn

Corresponding author at: School of Humanities and Law, Zhejiang A & F University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 311300, China.
, Muhammad Salman Chughtaic, Matteo Cristofarod
a School of Management, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China
b School of Humanities and Law, Zhejiang A & F University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 311300, China
c Faculty of Management Sciences, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan
d Department of Management and Law, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Resumen
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Figuras (2)
Tablas (7)
Table 1. Confirmatory Factor Analysis.
Table 2. Measurement of the Model.
Table 3. Descriptive Statistics, Reliability, and Correlations.
Table 4. Direct Effects.
Table 5. Moderation Analysis.
Table 6. Indirect Effects.
Table 7. Conditional Indirect Effects and Index of Moderated Mediation.
Mostrar másMostrar menos
Abstract

Recently, the Chinese concept of guanxi (networks or business relationships) has drawn considerable attention and inspired researchers to explore its prevalence in diverse cultures. Accordingly, we examined the direct link between supervisor-subordinate guanxi and employee work behaviors (innovative work behavior and work engagement) by investigating the moderating effect of trust in the supervisor and the mediating effect of psychological empowerment. We collected data randomly from 510 employees (383 subordinates and 127 supervisors) working in China's manufacturing industry. The PROCESS macros operationalize the study constructs to test the presence of moderated mediation. All the hypothesized relationships are supported except the mediating role of psychological empowerment in the supervisor-subordinate guanxi and innovative work behavior relationships. The findings demonstrated that trust in supervisors strengthens the supervisor-subordinate guanxi's direct effect on psychological empowerment and its indirect impact on employees’ work behaviors. To promote positive employees and work behaviors, organizations can develop supervisor-subordinate guanxi that supports organizational goals.

Ethics statement

This study was carried out in accordance with the recommendations of the Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct by the American Psychological Association's (APA). All participants gave written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol was approved by the ethics committee of Jiangsu University, China.

Keywords:
Supervisor–Subordinate Guanxi
Trust in Supervisor
Psychological Empowerment
Innovative Work Behavior
Work Engagement
Texto completo
Introduction

“Alone, we can do so little; together, we can do so much.” (Helen Keller).

Employees’ behaviors in organizations influence work accomplishments and organizational success (Khan et al., 2018). Developing synergies is crucial to generating productive outcomes and enhancing organizational image (Khan et al., 2019). Monetary gains and market share typically measure organizational success and brand equity developed by top management (Li, Duverger & Yu, 2018). Even though these factors help realize organizational goals, employees’ attitudes and work behaviors are also crucial for organizational success (Zhang et al., 2017). Employees are key corporate resources (Khan et al., 2019), and employee retention has become a global challenge (Li et al., 2018). Mejia et al. (2018) have shown that a strong bond between supervisors and subordinates reduces employee turnover and improves work behaviors. As a result of high-quality relationships in the work environment, employees are able to access useful resources and support (Atitumpong & Badir, 2018). Influential leaders encourage employees to achieve mutual goals (Ali et al., 2019) and create a positive environment through communication with subordinates (Zhou et al., 2020). Substantial investigations have been carried out on the role of leaders in improving employees’ creativity and job performance (Atitumpong & Badir, 2018; Guan & Frenkel, 2019). However, few studies have investigated whether an informal exchange relationship between supervisors and subordinates enhances efficiency and fosters positive work behaviors (Guan & Frenkel, 2020).

Social interactions outside the workplace have been shown to affect employees’ performance (Ali et al., 2019). Research has explored the informal relationships embedded in the Chinese work culture, known as guanxi (Wang et al., 2016). Generally, guanxi applies to social/personal relationships through which employees build reciprocal and cordial links, achieving mutual benefits (Ali et al., 2019). This study focuses on supervisor-subordinate guanxi (SSG) based on social connections in work and non-work environments (Cheung et al., 2009). In Asia, on specific occasions or holidays, bosses and subordinates socialize outside the workplace (Mejia et al., 2018). In contrast, the Western leader-member exchange (LMX) concept is based on individualistic work values and formal ties (Cheung et al., 2009). Eastern work culture stands on collectivism and often extends to employees’ personal lives (Bari et al., 2020). This phenomenon has been studied extensively in China, where strong relationships between employers and employees are believed to increase productivity (Law et al., 2000). Based on social exchange theory (SET), in line with Saeed et al. (2019), this study contends that leaders’ encouragement, motivation, and incentives strengthen employee relationships. Numerous studies have found that SSG significantly affects employees’ work outcomes (Guan & Frenkel, 2020; Li et al., 2018). SSG influences innovative work behavior (IWB), recognized by scholars as extra-role behavior, ensuring long-term organizational survival (Jamil & Yukongdi, 2020). Liu, Wang and Chen (2019) have shown that a supportive leadership style facilitates IWB. Work engagement (WE) is reflected in the enthusiasm, zeal, and dedication to carry out the tasks at work (Agarwal et al., 2012; Schaufeli & Bakker, 2004). Devoted employees guarantee an organization's survival, productivity, and sustainability (Saeed et al., 2019). Hence, leaders need to push for high WE amongst employees to achieve organizational objectives (Lu, Xie & Guo, 2018). However, very few studies have assessed the impact of SSG on employees’ work behaviors (Ali et al., 2019; Miao et al., 2019). In business relationships, guanxi helps entrepreneurs expand their businesses, maintain a competitive edge (Chen, Chang & Lee, 2015), and develop creative and innovative industries (Chen et al., 2015). The manufacturing industry requires a new approach to satisfying stakeholders (Iqbal et al., 2020), and WE and IWB are essential to bridle the competitive market. Hence, this study investigates the influence of SSG on employee WE and IWB in the manufacturing industry.

Previous studies unveiled that trust in supervisor (TIS) facilitates guanxi between supervisors and subordinates (Wong, 2017; Yan, 2018). Trust in the leader results in positive behaviors and attitudes (Jamil & Yukongdi, 2020; Yan, 2018). The emotional bonds between employees and supervisors depend on their level of mutual trust (Han, Peng & Zhu, 2012). Psychological empowerment (PE) is an outcome of trust (Gill et al., 2019). The supervisor's quality and the subordinate relationship depend on the level of trust (Wong, 2017). Since the 1980s, empowerment-related studies have focused on organizational development (Agarwal et al., 2012; Liu et al., 2019). However, few studies have analyzed the association between PE and employees’ work behaviors (Agarwal et al., 2012; Saeed et al., 2019; Iqbal et, al.,2020). Psychologically empowered individuals exhibit higher WE and innovative behaviors (Saeed et al., 2019). Hence, this study investigates PE in the relationship between SSG, employee IWB, and WE.

By analyzing the SSG in Chinese cultural contexts, we aim is to investigate when and how SSG affects employee work behavior and what mechanisms play an essential role in the supervisor-subordinate relationship. We use SET by Blau (1964) as the conceptual framework to assess three key objectives. The first objective is to investigate the role of SSG among employees in the manufacturing industry in terms of the quality of the SSG that affects the employees' IWB and WE. Second, this study explores the mechanism that explains how high SSG between supervisors and subordinates might successfully develop IWB and WE. Based on the model of supervisor-subordinate relationships, this study employed TIS as a factor. Moderator evidence demonstrated in previous research has shown that when workers have a high level of confidence in their supervisor, they invest effort in performing their work efficiently. In addition, this study investigates whether PE can mediate the impact of SSG on employee work behaviors. Notably, the findings contribute to understanding the mechanism by which SSG can improve IWB and WE from diverse cultures. From a practical point of view, this study offers recommendations for the management of Chinese organizations to strengthen SSG and develop IWB and WE through PE and TIS. Lastly, this study provides new insights into the area by associating SET with the SSG concept, as shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Conceptual Model.

(0,11MB).
Literature reviewSupervisor subordinate Guanxi, innovative work behavior, and work engagement

Supervisor–subordinate guanxi is a trait that establishes appropriate behaviors and where each party cares for the other (Charoensukmongkol, 2022). Based on SET (Blau, 1964), when someone receives a favor, the receiver is expected to repay the favor at some point. According to some psychological and sociological studies that elucidate behaviors through exogenous social norms, social behavior is influenced by the give-and-take philosophy (Cohen & Blecher, 2022). The significance of social contacts at work varies depending on the private social lives of remote workers since those with weaker social networks outside of work may place a higher value on work relationships (Mergener & Trübner, 2022). Situating SSG in SET, supervisors can develop a culture that addresses employees’ personal needs such that they feel obligated to support the vision of their supervisor to maximize gains (Khalid & Ahmed, 2015).

According to the social exchange perspective, the leader encourages employees to respond with superior creativity and innovativeness. Leaders as supervisors foster IWB by encouraging employees to strive for common goals (Li et al., 2019). When strong SSG exists, subordinates are expected to have access to essential information, social assistance with the supervisor's referral, and the resources needed to implement positive change. Thus, employees work collectively through the social exchange, leading to increased IWB (Ratasuk & Charoensukmongkol, 2020).

Likewise, WE is termed a positive, fulfilling, and work-related mental state characterized by enthusiasm, commitment, and absorption (Schaufeli et, al.,2002). This suggests that a situation in which people are cognitively, emotionally, or physically committed to their work displays work engagement (Aboramadan et al., 2022). An engaged workforce is necessary in today's globalized competitive environment (Aboramadan et al., 2022). Work engagement is an emotional state positively associated with essential conclusions such as job performance, commitment, and health (Kartal, 2018). In the context of social exchange, SSG plays a vital role in employees' intrinsic motivation to do a good job (Agarwal, 2014). Employees who have good guanxi with their supervisors are more engaged in their work because high-quality leader-member relationships boost followers’ WE (Jiang, Xi & Tian, 2015). Furthermore, the SSG improves work behavior and performance (Guan & Frenkel, 2019). Employees who have a positive relationship with their managers are more likely to invest extra effort and be involved in organizational tasks (Aggarwal et al., 2020). Therefore, we expect SSG to relate positively to IWB and WE based on the above discussion. The following hypotheses are proposed,

  • H1a: SSG is positively related to IWB.

  • H1b: SSG is positively related to WE.

Moderating role of trust in supervisor

Trust is an important factor in collaboration. This represents the most direct, cost-efficient, and successful strategy for leaders to boost organizational effectiveness (Azizah, 2021). According to social exchange theory, employees typically reciprocate the treatment meted out by their employer in a way they believe to be fair (Blau, 1964). When workers view their boss favorably, it strengthens the social exchange connection and helps them build trust with him or her (Ahmad et al., 2019). As a result, workers feel obligated to repay the leader's actions with fruitful workplace outcomes. More particularly, interactions between employees and supervisors result in reciprocal exchanges based on the values of fairness and trust. (Aboramadan et, al., 2022). Researchers found a significant link between trust and citizenship behavior (Sokmen & Yasrebdoost, 2022), interpersonal trust (Chudzicka-Czupala et al., 2022), effective supervisory communication (Men, Qin & Jin, 2022) and performance feedback (Asad et al., 2021). Trust is often connected with innovation, organizational survival, and a number of critical employee perceptions and actions (Cao & Le, 2022). An employee's supervisor assessment measures TIS (Basit, 2017). Trust in the supervisor improves an employee's willingness to accept greater responsibilities inherent in an empowerment effort, as well as innovativeness and creativity (Ertürk, 2012). According to (Tzafrir et al., 2004), the only way for management to benefit from empowerment is through a high-trust culture. Employees feel psychologically empowered when they work in a trust-based environment, which leads to increased ownership (Gill et al., 2019).

In a social exchange relationship, the parties choose to be courteous in their reciprocation, and trust is generally rewarded with trust (Legood et al., 2021). As a result, employees should anticipate that their first motivated response will fulfill their commitment to their bosses by increasing their faith in reciprocation (Nazir et al., 2018). Thus, followers' trust is an immediate reaction to positive assessments of supervisors' socio-structural actions as benign organizational support that improves subordinates' fulfillment of their psychological needs. Moreover, Wong, Ngo and Wong (2003) have determined that SSG positively predicts TIS. Literature also shows a significant positive relationship between SSG and TIS, with SSG showing substantial overlap with leader-member exchanges (Ding & Yu, 2020). The strength of the relationship between the supervisor and the subordinate depends on the level of TIS (Wong, 2017). Therefore, based on the above discussion, it is hypothesized that,

  • H2 TIS moderates the relationship between SSG and PE.

Mediating role of psychological empowerment

PE is contextual, and individual meaning denotes various core processes and emotional conditions of the intellectual type, influencing people's perceptions of themselves (Permarupan et al., 2020). Internal task motivation that displays self-control in regard to one's active participation in the work role is called psychological empowerment (Joo & Galbraith, 2022). According to SET, when leaders and subordinates have good guanxi, it increases employees’ PE, increasing IWB, which is one of the most prominent characteristics of employees’ work behavior (Dedahanov et al., 2019; Khan et al., 2020). It also encourages innovative ideas pushing individuals to surpass the defined job description by increasing their PE.

Furthermore, PE contributes to a high WE and reduces withdrawal behavior (Aggarwal et al., 2020). It was determined that the social exchange interaction between the leader and the subordinate was critical in improving job outcomes and WE (Breevaart et al., 2015). Researchers found a strong link between LMX and employee empowerment. They also showed how PE could serve as a connection between LMX and job outcomes (Chiu et al., 2020). As a result, it is important to investigate the impact of SSG on IWB and WE through PE. Therefore, on the contention that SSG has a strong effect on employees’ IWB and WE, the following hypotheses are proposed when they feel psychologically empowered:

  • H3a: PE mediates the relationship between SSG and IWB

  • H3b: PE mediates the relationship between SSG and WE

The moderating-mediating role of trust in supervisor

It seems that employee job outcomes are positively affected by TIS (Men et al., 2022). Scholars found that TIS positively and significantly affects the supervisor-subordinate relationship at work (Yan, 2018). Trust is influenced by leadership style and the counterparty's trustworthiness and fairness (Afsar & Masood, 2018). In our study, TIS refers to the emotional ties that develop between a leader and a follower as they participate in the process of social exchange. On the other hand, the latter is based on reciprocity norms and SET (Blau, 1964), and it anticipates employees’ desire to reciprocate the leader's care and well-being. Thus, trustworthiness necessitates integrity (Afsar & Masood, 2018) and implies that trust boosts employees’ confidence in the leader. When subordinates feel psychologically empowered, they are more likely to participate in decision-making processes and take risks to achieve organizational success (Emery et al., 2019).

According to Kim (2022), TIS may also encourage employees to engage in extra-role behavior as a sign of their loyalty to the company and their jobs. Additionally, when TIS is present, subordinates are eager to accept more responsibilities because they feel psychologically empowered (Gill et al., 2019). Employees are then incentivized to invest more effort to improve their level of engagement and innovation. Hence, we expect a conducive work environment that psychologically empowers employees in decision-making would substantially increase IWB and WE. Therefore, it is hypothesized that,

  • H4a: TIS significantly moderates the indirect effect of PE on the relationship between SSG and IWB.

  • H4b: TIS significantly moderates the indirect effect of PE on the relationship between SSG and WE.

MethodsData collection and sample

The researchers of this study gathered information from manufacturing organizations (textiles, automobiles, and cement) in Jiangsu Province, China. Data for this study was collected from operational and administrative departments (i.e., marketing, sales, production/operations, quality, research and development, and information technology) of the respective manufacturing organizations. The manufacturing sector is a major contributor to every economy, especially in China. According to the world bank report of 2021, the manufacturing sector contributed 27.44% to the GDP of China. Data was collected using the simple random sampling technique, as this technique saves time and cost for data collection. Furthermore, the researchers of this study used the temporal separation method, as suggested by Podsakoff et al. (2003), to overcome the biasness of self-reporting opinions of the respondents. Two months' time lag was given between the first and second time lag. Data for this study was collected from a multi-level (supervisor-rated) process. This method increases the efficiency of the data and mitigates the data bias of respondents. Therefore, the researchers randomly collected data about the IWB of subordinates from their immediate officers/supervisors.

Researchers of this study contacted the human resource/administrative departments of the respective organizations which were chosen as the sample population for this study. Subsequently, researchers visited the respective organizations, and data was collected without any interference from the researchers. Immediate officers/supervisors and their subordinates were briefed before the distribution of the questionnaires in the context of the purpose of the study and data confidentiality, a description of the study's objective, and reassurance that they could quit the study at any time. A blank envelope was also given to the respondents with the questionnaire to ensure the confidentiality of their opinions, and researchers requested respondents (immediate officers/supervisors and their subordinates) to return the questions in the envelope to their respective human resource/administrative departments after filling in the questionnaires.

Before distributing questionnaires to subordinates and their immediate officers/supervisors, special coding was done on the survey questionnaires in order to match the questionnaires. Moreover, researchers collected the email addresses of the respondents on the questionnaires to ensure the pair accuracy of the questionnaires after populating it from the same respondents during the first and second phases; This also created an advantage for the researchers to pair their survey questionnaires at the end of data collection for the analysis process. The data was collected at two different times from immediate officers/supervisors and subordinates. In the first round (T1), the subordinates were asked to fill out the survey questionnaire and provide their opinions about SSG and PE. In the second phase (T2), subordinates’ views about TIS and WE levels were gathered. In parallel, in the second phase (T2), the data was also collected from immediate officers/supervisors of those employees who participated in both rounds to rate their IWB.

In the first round (T1), the opinions of subordinates were collected for SSG and PE. For this purpose, 580 questionnaires were disseminated, and at the end of this phase (T1), 495 questionnaires were received that were completed and filled. After an interval of two months, the second round (T2) began, with data being collected from subordinates and from immediate officers/supervisors; for that purpose, 495 questionnaires were distributed to the participants (subordinates who participated in the first round), and they were asked to give their opinions about TIS and WE. Furthermore, in this phase, the data was collected to obtain the opinions of the immediate officers/supervisors about the IWB of their subordinates. There were 170 supervisors that were supervising 495 subordinates that responded at T1. Of these, 127 questionnaires were received. Finally, we received 383 questionnaires from 495 subordinates and 127 questionnaires from 170 supervisors. These were completed in all aspects by matching using the special identification codes; a final sample of 510 sets was obtained (383 subordinates were supervised by 127 immediate officers/supervisors), constituting a response rate of 68%, which was ready for further statistical analysis.

Measurement scales

The measurement scales were adapted from previous studies. All responses were evaluated on a five-point Likert scale, ranging from “Strongly Disagree-1″ to “Strongly Agree-5.”

Supervisor-Subordinate guanxi was measured using an eight-item measure developed by Wong et al. (2003). The scale covers the questions from subordinates about their relationship with their supervisors in developing guanxi. Thus, subordinates were asked to answer questions based on the last one-year relationship with their supervisors. Three items were removed during the confirmatory analysis process, which could not meet the minimum threshold of the loading. Sample item comprised “I am quite willing to help my immediate supervisor after work”; “I have frequent interactions with my immediate supervisor after work.” The alpha value of the construct was α =0.79.

Psychological Empowerment was measured using a nine-item measure developed by Sprietzer (1995). Subordinates were asked to report their level of PE during the year. Three items were removed during the confirmatory analysis process, which cannot meet the minimum threshold of the loading. Sample of the measurement scale is “I am confident about my ability to do my job”; “I have significant autonomy in determining how 1 do my job." The alpha value of the construct was α =0.85.

Trust in Supervisor was measured using a four-item scale proposed by Podsakoff et al. (1990). Subordinates were asked to give their opinions about their level of trust in their immediate officers/supervisors. Sample items include “I have complete faith in the integrity of my supervisor"; “My supervisor would not try to gain an advantage by deceiving employees.” The alpha value of the construct was α =0.92.

Innovative Work Behavior was measured using a six-item scale developed by Scott and Bruce (1994). The employees’ immediate officers/supervisors were asked to rate the innovative behavior of their subordinates at the workplace during the year. Two items were removed during the confirmatory analysis process, which cannot meet the minimum threshold of the loading. Example of sample items includes “he/she develops adequate plans and schedules for the implementation of new ideas,” “he/she searches out new technologies, processes, techniques, and product ideas.” The alpha value of the construct was α =0.82.

Work Engagement was assessed through an 18-item scale developed by Schaufeli, Bakker and Salanova (2006). Subordinates were asked to report their level of WE during the year. Ten items were removed during the confirmatory analysis process, which cannot meet the minimum threshold of the loading. Sample items include "When I am working, I forget everything else around me.”; “I am proud of the work that I do.” The alpha value of the construct was α =0.89.

Control variables

We controlled age, education, gender, and experience, as previous studies have shown that these demographic constructs significantly affect the relationship between SSG and employees' work behaviors (Ding & Yu, 2020; Guan & Frenkel, 2019; Li et al., 2018). Therefore, these constructs were controlled during the hypotheses testing.

Analysis

Regression analysis was performed to assess the direct effect of a predictor variable on the criterion variable. Further, PROCESS macros were employed for the analysis of mediation and moderation. This software allows testing complex and contingency models; for instance, the moderated mediation model requires efficient and convenient computations (Preacher et al., 2007). Additionally, this software is popular in the management, marketing, and business fields (Hayes, 2013).

Demographics (Subordinates)

Demographically, 383 respondents were male, and 91.12% (349) and 8.87% (34) were female. In terms of age groups, 21.67% (83) of participants were 20–30 years old, 28.2% (108) were 31–40 years old, 44.13% (169) were 41–50 years old, and 6.01% (23) were 51–60 years old. Their educational qualification was 85.38% (327) undergraduate, 10.18% (39) graduate, and 4.44% (17) post-graduate. Earlier studies indicated that the higher-educational level of employees influences the innovation capability of the individuals and the research development level of the firms (Duan et al., 2022). Moreover, manufacturing sector organizations, such as pharmaceutical, textile, cement, and automobile industries, hire highly educated workforce for the attainment of competitive advantage through innovations (Khan et al., 2022; Li et al., 2022). Therefore, data for this study was also collected from the subordinates and immediate officers/supervisors who hold a graduation and post-graduation degree and work in different technical departments of manufacturing organizations. In terms of work experience, 44.65% (171) of participants worked 5–10 years, 29.77% (114) were employed for 11–15 years, 19.58% (75) worked 16–20 years, and 6.01% (23) were employed for 21–25 years.

Demographics (Supervisors)

Demographically, 127 respondents were male, of which 95.27% (121) and 4.72% (06) were female. In terms of age groups, 29.14% (37) of participants were 20–30 years old, 40.94% (52) were 31–40 years old, 18.11% (23) were 41–50 years old, and 11.81% (15) were 51–60 years old. Their educational qualification was 75.59% (96) undergraduate, 17.32% (22) graduate, and 7.09% (9) post-graduate. In terms of work experience, 22.83% (29) of participants worked 5–10 years, 37.8% (48) were employed for 11–15 years, 25.2% (32) worked 16–20 years, and 14.17% (18) were employed for 21–25 years.

Model measurement

A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was run to test the reliability and validity of the construct. Table 1 shows the values of CFA, where all indicators meet the minimum threshold 0.500–0.700 of factor loading (Kock, 2015). Moreover, the average variance extracted (AVE) values are above the minimum threshold (0.500) recommended by Fornell and Larcker (1981). The composite reliability (CR) values meet the minimum threshold (0.700) (Fornell & Larcker, 1981). The alpha values of all variables (in parenthesis) also exceed the minimum threshold (0.70) recommended by van Griethuijsen et al. (2014). To check the common method variance (CMV), we adopted several methods suggested by earlier researchers. CMV occurs simultaneously as data of study variables are collected from the respondents simultaneously, which can endanger the statistical results. According to, if there is a high correlation (0.900) between the study variables, then there is CMV; values of correlations about all study variables of this study are between 0.300 to 0.700, as shown in correlation table as well 3, so there is no chance of CMV. For further clarification about the CMV, we calculate the inner values of VIF (variance inflation factor). According to Kock (2015), if each construct item's inner value is less than or equal to 5, then there is no chance of CMV; VIF values of each item of this study are less than five and are between 1 and 5, as shown in Table 1. Finally, to cross-verify the problem of CMV, we ran the single factor analysis (cumulative percentage value) as suggested by Harman (1967) for the extracted sum of squared loadings, and we found it to be 37.13%, which is less than 50%, showing that no problem of CMV found in this data (Field, 2013).

Table 1.

Confirmatory Factor Analysis.

Variable  Measurement Items  Factor Loading  Alpha  CR  AVE  VIF 
Supervisor Subordinate Guanxi (Subordinate-Rated)SSG_04  0.783  0.79  0.859  0.553  2.642 
SSG_05  0.880        2.542 
SSG_06  0.690        2.315 
SSG_07  0.740        2.323 
SSG_08  0.595        1.980 
Psychological Empowerment (Subordinate-Rated)PE_02  0.819  0.85  0.891  0.579  3.197 
PE_03  0.667        1.857 
PE_04  0.833        2.394 
PE_05  0.708        3.474 
PE_06  0.744        3.432 
PE_08  0.782        2.637 
Trust in Supervisor (Subordinate -Rated)TIS_01  0.931  0.92  0.944  0.809  3.378 
TIS_02  0.968        1.032 
TIS_03  0.869        2.726 
TIS_04  0.824        2.264 
Innovative Work Behavior (Supervisor-Rated)IWB_03  0.694  0.82  0.902  0.700  1.519 
IWB_04  0.901        2.880 
IWB_05  0.851        2.587 
IWB_06  0.885        2.522 
Work Engagement (Subordinate -Rated)WE_04  0.692  0.89  0.913  0.602  2.840 
WE_05  0.700        3.830 
WE_06  0.828        3.876 
WE_08  0.644        4.152 
WE_16  0.886        3.232 
WE_17  0.798        4.297 
WE_18  0.850        3.875 

Moreover, we measured the structural model for the goodness of fit through AMOS. Table 2 shows the values of measurement of good fitness, and all fitness indicators meet the minimum thresholds as suggested by Hair, Gabriel and Patel (2014); Hu, Bentler and Hu (1999).

Table 2.

Measurement of the Model.

Fitness Criteria  Acceptable Range  Model Measurement  Structural Model 
CMIN/DF  1–3  2.849  1.927 
GFI  >0.90  .981  .946 
AGFI  >0.80  .903  .892 
CFI  >0.95  .980  .938 
TLI  >0.90  .932  .915 
NFI  >0.90  .976  .937 
RMR  <0.09  .009  .019 
REMSEA  <0.08  .024  .062 
P_CLOSE  >0.05  .006  .027 
Descriptive statistics and correlations

Table 3 shows the present study variables’ descriptive statistics and correlation values. All variables exhibit a positive and significant correlation between the study variables. Further, the mean, standard deviation, and correlation of control variables are reported as part of the research design (Carlson & Wu, 2012).

Table 3.

Descriptive Statistics, Reliability, and Correlations.

    Mean  SD  10 
Gender  1.18  0.383  −0.084  −0.332**  .002  .112*  −0.143**  .323**  .041  .176**  .308** 
Age  1.74  0.784    −0.505**  .013  .131*  .102*  .305**  .055  −0.055  .116* 
Edu  1.98  0.814        −0.022  −0.080  .047  −0.079  −0.007  .050 
Exp  4.43  0.734          .364**  .640**  .613**  .452**  .784** 
SSG  4.2136  .57834            .368**  .322*  .236**  .395** 
PE  4.1276  .51511              .463**  .406**  .484** 
TIS  4.5078  .49928                .171**  .392** 
IWB  3.9439  .67159                  .362** 
WE  4.2089  .48781                   

Note: SSG; supervisor subordinate guanxi, PE; psychological empowerment, TIS; trust in supervisor, IWB; innovative work behavior, WE; work engagement, **p < .05, *p<.01.

Direct effects

Table 4 illustrates the estimated direct effects. In Model-1, SSG positively and significantly influences PE (β=0.300, p<.001, t = 7.729), while in Model-2, SSG significantly and positively affects IWB (β=0.233, p<.001, t = 13.353), and in Model-3, PE significantly and positively influences IWB (β=0.317, p<.001, t = 8.676). Moreover, the results of Model-4 indicate that SSG positively and significantly affects WE (β=0.360, p<.001, t = 10.128), and Model-5 shows that PE significantly and positively influences WE (β=0.398, p<.001, t = 11.715). Hence, H1a and H1b are supported.

Table 4.

Direct Effects.

Direct Paths  β  SE  R2/R2 Change   
Model-1  SSG → PE  .300***  .04  7.729  .136 (0.133)  59.733*** 
Model-2  SSG → IWB  .233***  .03  13.353  .345 (0.340)  95.432*** 
Model-3  PE → IWB  .317***  .07  8.676  .265 (0.263)  98.172*** 
Model-4  SSG → WE  .360***  .03  10.128  .245 (0.243)  83.823*** 
Model-5  PE → WE  .398***  .03  11.715  .214 (0.210)  98.634*** 

Note: SSG; supervisor subordinate guanxi, PE; psychological empowerment, TIS; trust in supervisor, IWB; innovative work behavior, WE; work engagement, ***p<.001.

Moderation effects

Table 5 reports the moderation results. The moderation of TIS is tested using a bootstrapping sample of 5000 observations. In Model-1 (Hayes, 2018), the impact of the interaction (SSG x TIS) on PE is significant (β=0.36, p<.001), indicating that a high level of TIS strengthens the relationship between SSG and PE. Thus, H2 is supported.

Table 5.

Moderation Analysis.

Variable  Psychological Empowerment
  β  SE 
Intercept  2.581***  .20  12.892 
Gender  .351***  .04  10.034 
Age  −0.090***  .02  −4.214 
Marital Status  −0.053***  .01  −3.937 
Education  .023  .01  1.690 
Experience  .337***  .03  10.989 
SSG  .148***  .02  6.342 
TIS  .094**  .03  2.794 
SSG x TIS  .364***  .06  6.436 
R2  .803     
Adjusted R2  .799     
F  190.658***     

Note: SSG; supervisor subordinate guanxi, PE; psychological empowerment, TIS; trust in Supervisor, ***p < .001; ** p<.01.

The interaction (SSG x TIS) slope was plotted to further elaborate on the moderation results. Fig. 2 shows that a higher level of employees’ TIS strengthens the relationship between SSG and PE.

Fig. 2.

Interaction Effects.

(0,12MB).
Indirect effects

The indirect effect of PE is tested using the methods proposed by Hayes (2018) and (Sobel, 1982). Table 6 reports the results for the mediation effect of PE in the relationship between SSG and IWB (DV-I). The zero value is found between the lower and upper lower-level class intervals (β=0.05, LL&UL=−0.03; 0.07), which indicates a lack of PE mediation (Hayes, 2018). These results are further supported by Sobel (1982), as the p-values are greater than 0.05 (β=0.05, p>.05), indicating no significant mediation. Thus, H3a is not supported. Table 6 also reports the mediation effect of PE in the relationship between SSG and WE (DV-II). No zero is found between the lower and upper lower-level class intervals (β=0.19, LL&UL=0.14;.24), which indicates that PE mediates the association between SSG and WE (Hayes, 2018). These results are also in line with Sobel (1982). The p-values are lower than 0.001, demonstrating a significant PE mediation in the relationship between SSG and WE (β=0.19, p<.001). Thus, H3b is supported.

Table 6.

Indirect Effects.

Model  SSG → PE → IWB
  β  SE  LL/UL  z (p) 
Indirect Effect (Bootstrap)  .05  .01  −0.03, 0.07   
Indirect Effect (Normal theory test-Sobel)  .05  .01    3.59 (0.07) 
Model  SSG → PE → WE
  β  SE  LL/UL  z (p) 
Indirect Effect (Bootstrap)  .19***  .03  .14, 0.24   
Indirect Effect (Normal theory test-Sobel)  .19***  .02    7.50*** (0.00) 

Note: SSG= supervisor subordinate guanxi, PE= psychological empowerment, TIS= trust in supervisor, IWB; innovative work behavior, WE; work engagement, LL, lower limit; UL, upper limit, ***p < .001.

Moderated mediation effects

The significance of the indirect relationship between SSG and IWB, and WE via PE with low and high TIS levels are calculated with a 95% confidence interval using Model-7 (Hayes, 2018). Table 7 reports conditional indirect effects and moderated mediation index values. SSG is indirectly and positively related to IWB (DV-I) when employees exhibit higher TIS levels, as no zero is found between the values of the 95% CIs (Effect=0.01, LL &UL=0.05, 0.03). However, SSG is also indirectly and positively related to WE (DV-II) when employees exhibit a higher level of TIS as no CIs exhibit zero values (Effect=0.03, LL&UL=0.03, 0.09). The moderated mediation index indicates that a higher level of TIS is linked to a more significant positive indirect effect of SSG on IWB via PE (index=0.07, LL&UL=0.11, 0.04). In comparison, a higher level of TIS is linked to a more significant positive indirect effect of SSG on WE via PE (index=0.31, LL&UL=0.38, 0.23). Thus, H4a and H4b are supported.

Table 7.

Conditional Indirect Effects and Index of Moderated Mediation.

  (IWB as Dependent Variable)(WE as Dependent Variable)
Mediator  TIS (Moderator)  Effect (SE)  Boot LLCI/ULCI  TIS (Moderator)  Effect (SE)  Boot LLCI/ULCI 
PE (−1 SD)  −0.50  .08 (0.02)  .00, 0.12  −0.50  .33 (0.03)  −0.27, 0.40 
PE (+1 SD)  .50  .01 (0.01)  .05, 0.03  .50  .03 (0.03)  .03, 0.09 
Moderated Mediation Index (SSG as Independent Variable)
  (IWB as Dependent Variable)(WE as Dependent Variable)
Mediator  Index  Boot SE  Boot LLCI/ULCI  Index  Boot SE  Boot LLCI/ULCI 
PE (TIS as Moderator)  .07  .02  .11, 0.04  .31  .04  .38, 0.23 

Note: SSG; supervisor subordinate guanxi, PE; psychological empowerment, TIS; trust in supervisor, IWB; innovative work behavior, WE; work engagement, LL, lower limit; UL, upper limit; CI, Confidence Interval.

Discussion

In an attempt to resolve the puzzle caused by the ambiguous empirical findings on SSG and employees' work behaviors in the existing literature, this study assesses the moderating and mediating role of TIS and PE in the association between SSG and employees' work behaviors, namely, IWB and WE in the Chinese work environment. The results largely support our proposal that SSG has a positive on employees' work behaviors. Moreover, TIS serves as a moderating, and PE acts as a mediating construct that enhances the link between SSG and employee work behavior. The results of the H1 revealed, as expected that SSG had a significant direct impact on employee IWB and WE. The findings were supported (Zhang, Zhou & Kwan, 2017) and showed that SSG influences employee work behaviors by encouraging IWB and positive WE. Premised on SET, it is implied that staff members who have positive supervisor-subordinate relationships display highly positive behaviors that are advantageous to both leaders and the entity (Cropanzano et al., 2017). Subordinates are positively affected and motivated by their supervisors, which improves their performance, interpersonal interactions, and work behaviors (Ding & Yu, 2020; Guan & Frenkel, 2020; Liu et al., 2019). Moreover, the present study also looked into how important factors influence the relationship between SSG and employees' work behaviors. TIS demonstrated that the association between SSG and PE is strengthened when TIS is high, as hypothesized in H2 by moderating the relationship between PE and SSG. The findings supported (Javed et al., 2018; Wong, 2017) and showed that when supervisors gain employees' trust and comprehend their requirements, workers will respond positively to achieve organizational objectives. Additionally, SET claims that when two parties, such as subordinates and supervisors, exchange mutual benefits in order to further their individual or organizational interests, both parties gain advantageous resources, such as TIS, which strengthens the bond between SSG and PE. To put it another way, a high level of TIS would make the bonds between SSG and PE stronger.

Besides that, we did not find evidence to support the mediated effect of PE in the relationship between SSG and the employees' IWB in H3a. Unexpectedly, the findings were contradictory with previous studies on supervisors and subordinates, which supported the supervisors' and subordinates' role in developing positive work behaviors through PE (Dedahanov et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2019). The possible reason why this hypothesis was not supported as guanxi could be that an informal favor exchange occasionally prevents formal or standard procedures from making the best human resource management choices (Yang et al., 2019). Subordinates occasionally fail to put forth their best efforts because having good guanxi with their superiors ensures benefits. As a result, subordinates' capacity to develop and apply novel ideas is compromised. The results of the H3b were supported that indicated the mediating effect of PE on SSG and employees' WE. According to the findings, PE acts as a mediating variable in the association between SSG and WE of employees, which is consistent with earlier studies (Yang et al., 2019) demonstrating how relationships based on mutual benefit sharing encourage productivity and support WE. Finally, TIS moderated the mediated effect of PE in the association between SSG and employee work behaviors, supporting the findings of our final moderated mediation model, H4. The findings highlighted the critical factors (TIS and PE) that strengthen the ties between supervisor and subordinates and encourage employees' work behaviors.

Theoretical implications

This study makes several contributions to organizational psychology and leadership literature. The current investigation indicated the significant impact of SSG on employees’ work behaviors by employing SET theory. This theory, which originated in the western world, was employed to further understand the guanxi phenomena in Chinese organizations. The exchange-based relationship between supervisors and subordinates, that is, SSGs, assists the workforce in acquiring skills to achieve vested interests and structuring work relationships (Xian, Atkinson & Meng-Lewis, 2017). Corroborating this, the relationship between leaders and subordinates is key to organizational success and leads to higher productivity levels.

Moreover, the present study revealed SSG as a significant predictor of IWB and WE in Chinese organizations. The findings demonstrated that supervisors and subordinates’ high-quality exchange led to IWB and WE (Özsungur, 2019). Consequently, a dynamic framework offers a new empirical contribution to IWB and WE. Employees work autonomously to handle tasks, and this helps enhance self-motivated learning to find opportunities to develop and accomplish innovative ideas (Kim & Park, 2017).

Further, the study indicated how TIS intensifies the SSG-PE association. The results demonstrated that TIS is an essential factor that strengthens the bond between supervisors and subordinates. As a result, when subordinates have high degrees of cognition-based confidence in their leaders, work-related knowledge, direction, and guidance offered by leaders are viewed as more trustworthy and beneficial. This research expands the scope of investigation on TIS, ensuring productive work behaviors (Afsar & Masood, 2018).

Moreover, the mediating role of PE was examined in the SSG and employees’ work behaviors relationship. Consequently, when bosses develop high exchange quality with subordinates, the employees view their work as important and reciprocate with positive work behaviors. Organizational members are more willing to seek new technologies, working methods, procedures, techniques, and innovations if they have this feeling and perception and high WE. Research added to the existing studies that recommended exploring the impact of internal psychological or cognitive processes affecting the association between SSG and employee outcomes (Liu et al., 2017).

The holistic moderated mediation model of TIS and PE in the link between SSG- employee work behaviors were analyzed to further understand the interplay of relationships. The findings of this hypothesis provided new insights into how TIS and PE interplay affect the study variables’ direct relationship. The integrated model's findings added to the literature on how specific mechanisms may enhance or inhibit SSG effects on employee work outcomes.

Practical implications

SSG is an informal exchange of mutual benefits that helps employees achieve organizational goals, creating a win-win situation for both parties. Training programs should be designed to support skill-building, high-quality exchange relationships, participation, positive criticism, innovation, collaborative decision-making, and the unconstrained expression of emotions.

Leaders nurturing personal relationships with subordinates generate affective responses in the work environment (Ali et al., 2019). Hence, organizations should create opportunities for supervisors and subordinates to mingle informally on ceremonial occasions, official retreats, and outdoor meetings, building a family-like atmosphere at the workplace (Guan & Frenkel, 2019). Further, direct supervisors should develop a social bond by remembering important events or occasions for the workforce, such as birthdays and anniversaries. Building an environment that creates trust, and respect, and boosts employees’ confidence is crucial to encouraging learning, personal growth, and freedom of speech, thus promoting IWB and WE.

Additionally, supervisors communicate with their familiar subordinates more frequently to extend social and practical support (like coaching and feedback). Additionally, by being able to better recognize employees’ requirements and preferences, both at work and at home, managers are perceived as having a greater job-related fit. Strong guanxi ties and bosses who genuinely care for their staff members often encourage excellent workplace behaviors. Employees are more likely to view management as fair and feel that their work has a significant impact on the organization. They feel more integrated into the organization as a whole, which helps them succeed at work.

Social implications

In Chinese culture, guanxi allows for the growth of inter-business relationships and interactions between the government and companies. This is crucial to the shaping and growth of day-to-day business transactions in a nation where business relations are deeply ingrained in society. This fosters productivity and efficiency. Further, guanxi serves as a crucial informal governance tool assisting Chinese businesses in leveraging social and economic channels. Guanxi can also be used by businesses as a means of circumventing institutions in China because the structure of local governments and government policies may obstruct the expansion of business contacts. Furthermore, guanxi itself is a wide phenomenon that is not restricted to China. We posit that similar effects might also exist in other societies, particularly in collectivist countries that value interpersonal connections.

Likewise, PE is an important source of motivation that could lead to higher levels of enhanced employee engagement and IWB at the workplace. Thus, greater productivity is not only important for organizations but also helps to gain efficiency and improvement in the quality of products/services that impacts the overall progress of society. Additionally, innovation has a crucial role in economic growth as it enables businesses to remain competitive in the marketplace. New ideas are essential for the solution of difficult challenges and for the development of nations in particular, which require them now more than ever. Additionally, TIS has been identified as crucial as it has an effect on collaboration, interpersonal, group solidarity, and the facilitation of social infrastructure.

Limitations and future studies

This study only focused on Chinese organizations, limiting the generalizability of the results. Thus, future studies should address different sectors to validate the study's findings. Further, this study focused on IWB and WE. Hence, future research should explore the impact of SSG on other work behaviors, such as organizational citizenship behaviors.

Similarly, only TIS and PE were investigated as moderating and mediating factors. Thus, other SSG mechanisms and employees’ work behaviors, such as perceived organizational support and leadership styles, should be investigated. Lastly, this study invites research to focus on when and how employees’ work behaviors are affected by SSG in different work cultures (and countries).

Conclusion

The present study infused SET to highlight the impact of SSG and employees IWE and WE in the Chinese work environment. It was revealed that when supervisors and subordinates both exchange benefits through guanxi, the relationship between supervisors and subordinates strengthens, leading to increased IWB and WE. Further, TIS intensifies the link between SSG and PE so that employees feel more psychologically empowered. Moreover, good guanxi between supervisors and subordinates leads employees to feel more psychologically empowered, ultimately yielding positive employee work behaviors such as IWB and WE.

In a nutshell, our holistic model and findings added valuable insights about the contextual contribution (i.e., implications of mutual exchange-based relationships). This study focused on the importance of the SSG relationship leading to positive employee IWB and WE by unveiling the essential moderated mediated effect of TIS and PE in the current study. From this perspective, organizations should not count only on existing formal human resource management policies but also consider building personal guanxi among employees by creating an environment that enables workers to engage in social activities. Further, official retreats help supervisors and employees share work-related knowledge and build a new foundation for renewed motivation (Guan & Frenkel, 2019). In line with this, productive discussions between workers and supervisors are likely to foster mutual exchanges. Thus, it is expected that the present model and findings will invite researchers to focus on when and how employees’ work behaviors are affected by SSG in varied work cultures.

Data availability statement

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References
[Aboramadan et al., 2022]
M. Aboramadan, Z. Hamid, Y.M. Kundi, E. El Hamalawi.
The effect of servant leadership on employees' extra-role behaviors in NPOs: The role of work engagement.
Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 33 (2022), pp. 109-129
[Afsar and Masood, 2018]
B. Afsar, M. Masood.
Transformational leadership, creative self-efficacy, trust in supervisor, uncertainty avoidance, and innovative work behavior of nurses.
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 54 (2018), pp. 36-61
[Agarwal, 2014]
U.A. Agarwal.
Examining the impact of social exchange relationships on innovative work behaviour: Role of work engagement.
Team Performance Management, 20 (2014), pp. 102-120
[Agarwal et al., 2012]
U.A. Agarwal, S. Datta, S. Blake-Beard, S. Bhargava.
Linking LMX, innovative work behaviour and turnover intentions: The mediating role of work engagement.
Career Development International, 17 (2012), pp. 208-230
[Aggarwal et al., 2020]
A. Aggarwal, P.K. Chand, D. Jhamb, A. Mittal.
Leader–member exchange, work engagement, and psychological withdrawal behavior: The mediating role of psychological empowerment.
Frontiers in Psychology, 11 (2020), pp. 423
[Ali, Sheikh, Ali, Jinji, & Sumbal, 2019]
M. Ali, A.Z. Sheikh, I. Ali, P. Jinji, M.S. Sumbal.
The moderating effect of supervisor–subordinate Guanxi on the relationship between transformational leadership and organizational effectiveness.
Journal of East-West Business, 26 (2019), pp. 161-192
[Asad et al., 2021]
M. Asad, G. Dastgeer, N. Uz Zaman, Z. Khalid, M.A. Brohi, A. Bibi.
The role of authentic leadership in shaping performance feedback reactions: The mediating role of trust in leader.
South Asian Journal of Human Resources Management, 9 (2021), pp. 33-52
[Atitumpong and Badir, 2018]
A. Atitumpong, Y.F. Badir.
Leader-member exchange, learning orientation and innovative work behavior.
Journal of Workplace Learning, 30 (2018), pp. 32-47
[Azizah, 2021]
S.N. Azizah.
Trust in supervisor for frontline employee : Quality of relationship as moderator.
[Bari, Mahmood, Qurrah-tul-ain, Bashir, & Usman, 2020]
M.W. Bari, F. Mahmood, M. Qurrah-tul-ain, Bashir, M. Usman.
The role of instrumental guanxi in the relation between entrepreneurs’ social competence and firms’ financial performance: A comparative study.
Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 34 (2020), pp. 243-265
[Basit, 2017]
A.A. Basit.
Trust in supervisor and job engagement: Mediating effects of psychological safety and felt obligation.
Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 151 (2017), pp. 701-721
[Bin Saeed et al., 2019]
B. Bin Saeed, B. Afsar, A. Shahjehan, S. Imad Shah.
Does transformational leadership foster innovative work behavior? The roles of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement.
Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 32 (2019), pp. 254-281
[Blau, 1964]
P.M. Blau.
Justice in social exchange.
Sociological Inquiry, 34 (1964), pp. 193-206
[Breevaart et al., 2015]
K. Breevaart, A.B. Bakker, E. Demerouti, M. van den Heuvel.
Leader-member exchange, work engagement, and job performance.
Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30 (2015), pp. 754-770
[Cao and Le, 2022]
T.T. Cao, P.B. Le.
Impacts of transformational leadership on organizational change capability: A two-path mediating role of trust in leadership.
European Journal of Management and Business Economics, (2022),
[Carlson and Wu, 2012]
K.D. Carlson, J. Wu.
The illusion of statistical control: control variable practice in management research.
Organizational Research Methods, 15 (2012), pp. 413-435
[Charoensukmongkol, 2022]
P. Charoensukmongkol.
Supervisor-subordinate guanxi and emotional exhaustion: The moderating effect of supervisor job autonomy and workload levels in organizations.
Asia Pacific Management Review, 27 (2022), pp. 40-49
[Chen et al., 2015]
M.H. Chen, Y.Y. Chang, C.Y. Lee.
Creative entrepreneurs’ Guanxi networks and success: Information and resource.
Journal of Business Research, 68 (2015), pp. 900-905
[Cheung et al., 2009]
M.F.Y. Cheung, W.P. Wu, A.K.K. Chan, M.M.L. Wong.
Supervisor-subordinate guanxi and employee work outcomes: The mediating role of job satisfaction.
Journal of Business Ethics, 88 (2009), pp. 77-89
[Chiu et al., 2020]
W. Chiu, R.T.Y. Hui, D. Won, J.S. Bae.
Leader-member exchange and turnover intention among collegiate student-athletes: The mediating role of psychological empowerment and the moderating role of psychological contract breach in competitive team sport environments.
European Sport Management Quarterly, 22 (2020), pp. 609-635
[Chudzicka-Czupała et al., 2022]
A. Chudzicka-Czupała, D. Grabowski, A. Czerw, M. Stasiła-Sieradzka.
Assessment of worklife areas, trust in supervisor and interpersonal trust as conditions of severity of stress at work.
International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, 35 (2022), pp. 719-730
[Cohen and Blecher, 2022]
A. Cohen, L. Blecher.
The relationship between social exchange variables and in-role performance, organizational citizenship behavior, and commitment: Evidence from Israeli community centers.
International Journal of Psychological Studies, 14 (2022), pp. 1-13
[Cropanzano et al., 2017]
R. Cropanzano, E.L. Anthony, S.R. Daniels, A.V. Hall.
Social exchange theory: A critical review with theoretical remedies.
Academy of Management Annals, 11 (2017), pp. 479-516
[Dedahanov et al., 2019]
A.T. Dedahanov, F. Bozorov, S. Sung.
Paternalistic leadership and innovative behavior: Psychological empowerment as a mediator.
Sustainability (Switzerland), 11 (2019), pp. 1-14
[Ding and Yu, 2020]
H. Ding, E. Yu.
Subordinate-oriented strengths-based leadership and subordinate job performance: The mediating effect of supervisor–subordinate Guanxi.
Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 41 (2020), pp. 1107-1118
[Duan et al., 2022]
Y. Duan, M. Yang, L. Huang, T. Chin, F. Fiano, E. de Nuccio, L. Zhou.
Unveiling the impacts of explicit vs. tacit knowledge hiding on innovation quality: The moderating role of knowledge flow within a firm.
Journal of Business Research, 139 (2022), pp. 1489-1500
[Emery et al., 2019]
C. Emery, J.E. Booth, G. Michaelides, A.J. Swaab.
The importance of being psychologically empowered: Buffering the negative effects of employee perceptions of leader–member exchange differentiation.
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 92 (2019), pp. 566-592
[Ertürk, 2012]
A. Ertürk.
Linking psychological empowerment to innovation capability: Investigating the moderating effect of supervisory trust.
International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3 (2012), pp. 153-166
[Field, 2013]
A. Field.
Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics.
Sage, (2013),
[Fornell and Larcker, 1981]
C. Fornell, D.F. Larcker.
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.
Journal of marketing research, 18 (1981), pp. 39-50
[Gill et al., 2019]
H. Gill, S.A. Cassidy, C. Cragg, P. Algate, C.A. Weijs, J.E. Finegan.
Beyond reciprocity: The role of empowerment in understanding felt trust.
European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28 (2019), pp. 845-858
[Guan and Frenkel, 2019]
X. Guan, S.J. Frenkel.
Explaining supervisor–subordinate Guanxi and subordinate performance through a conservation of resources lens.
Human Relations, 72 (2019), pp. 1752-1775
[Guan & Frenkel, 2020]
X. Guan, S. Frenkel.
Supervisor-subordinate Guanxi and employee thriving at work: The key role of relation-generated resources.
Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 59 (2020), pp. 400-419
[Hair et al., 2014]
J.F. Hair, M.L.D. Gabriel, V.K. Patel.
Amos covariance-based structural equation modeling (cb-sem): Guidelines on its application as a marketing research tool.
Brazilian Journal Of Marketing, 13 (2014), pp. 44-55
[Han et al., 2012]
Y. Han, Z. Peng, Y. Zhu.
Supervisor-subordinate Guanxi and trust in supervisor: A qualitative inquiry in the People's Republic of China.
Journal of Business Ethics, 108 (2012), pp. 313-324
[Harman, 1967]
D. Harman.
A single factor test of common method variance.
Journal of Psychology, 35 (1967), pp. 359-378
[Hayes, 2013]
A. Hayes.
Integrating mediation and moderation analysis: Fundamentals using PROCESS.
Introduction to mediation, moderation and conditional process analysis. a regression-based approach, Guilford Press, (2013),
[Hayes, 2018]
A.F. Hayes.
Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated mediation: Quantification, inference, and interpretation.
Communication Monographs, 85 (2018), pp. 4-40
[Hu et al., 1999]
L. Hu, P.M. Bentler, L. Hu.
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.
Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6 (1999), pp. 1-55
[Iqbal et al., 2020]
Q. Iqbal, N.H. Ahmad, A. Nasim, S.A.R. Khan.
A moderated-mediation analysis of psychological empowerment: Sustainable leadership and sustainable performance.
Journal of Cleaner Production, 262 (2020), pp. 1-12
[Jamil and Yukongdi, 2020]
S. Jamil, V. Yukongdi.
Information systems workforce and innovative work behavior: The role of participatory management, affective trust and Guanxi.
International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, 16 (2020), pp. 146-165
[Javed et al., 2018]
B. Javed, M.Y.A. Rawwas, S. Khandai, K. Shahid, H.H. Tayyeb.
Ethical leadership, trust in leader and creativity: The mediated mechanism and an interacting effect.
Journal of Management and Organization, 24 (2018), pp. 388-405
[Jiang et al., 2015]
X. Jiang, Y. Xi, S. Tian.
Supervisory favors’ effect on Chinese employees’ work engagement and satisfaction with supervisor: What the full vs partial mediating role of supportive leadership implies.
2015 International Conference on Economics, Social Science, Arts, Education and Management Engineering, pp. 545-549
[Joo et al., 2022]
B.K. Joo, S.K. Yoon, D. Galbraith.
The effects of organizational trust and empowering leadership on group conflict: Psychological safety as a mediator.
Organization Management Journal, 20 (2022), pp. 4-16
[Kartal, 2018]
N. Kartal.
Evaluating the relationship between work engagement, work alienation and work performance of healthcare professionals.
International Journal of Healthcare Management, 11 (2018), pp. 251-259
[Khalid and Ahmed, 2015]
J. Khalid, J. Ahmed.
Perceived organizational politics and employee silence: Supervisor trust as a moderator.
Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 21 (2015), pp. 174-195
[Khan, Zhiqiang, Abubakari Sadick, & Ibn Musah, 2018]
H.S. Khan, M. Zhiqiang, M. Abubakari Sadick, A.A. Ibn Musah.
Investigating the role of psychological contract breach, political skill and work ethic on perceived politics and job attitudes relationships: A case of higher education in Pakistan.
Sustainability, 10 (2018), pp. 4737
[Khan, Zhiqiang, Musah, & Udimal, 2019]
H.S. Khan, M. Zhiqiang, A.A.I. Musah, T.B. Udimal.
Impact of perceived organisational politics on job attitudes in health sector of Pakistan: The moderating role of Islamic work ethic.
Middle East J. of Management, 6 (2019), pp. 767-791
[Khan et al., 2020]
M.A. Khan, F.B. Ismail, A. Hussain, B. Alghazali.
The interplay of leadership styles, innovative work behavior, organizational culture, and organizational citizenship behavior.
SAGE open, 10 (2020), pp. 1-16
[Khan, Siddiqui, & Khan, 2022]
M.Y. Khan, S.H. Siddiqui, H.S. Khan.
Factors affecting the turnover intentions and affective commitment of employees in the pharmaceutical industry of Pakistan: the role of psychological contract.
International Journal of Management Practice, 15 (2022), pp. 159-174
[Kim, 2022]
K. Kim.
Supervisor leadership and subordinates’ innovative work behaviors: Creating a relational context for organizational sustainability.
Sustainability (Switzerland), 14 (2022), pp. 1-15
[Kim and Park, 2017]
W. Kim, J. Park.
Examining structural relationships between work engagement, organizational procedural justice, knowledge sharing, and innovative work behavior for sustainable organizations.
Sustainability, 9 (2017), pp. 205
[Kock, 2015]
N. Kock.
Common Method Bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach.
International Journal of E-Collaboration, 11 (2015), pp. 1-10
[Law et al., 2000]
K.S. Law, C.S. Wong, D. Wang, L. Wang.
Effect of supervisor-subordinate Guanxi on supervisory decisions in China: An empirical investigation.
International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11 (2000), pp. 751-765
[Legood et al., 2021]
A. Legood, L. van der Werff, A. Lee, D. Den Hartog.
A meta-analysis of the role of trust in the leadership-performance relationship.
European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 30 (2021), pp. 1-22
[Li et al., 2019]
H. Li, N. Sajjad, Q. Wang, A.M. Ali, Z. Khaqan, S. Amina.
Influence of transformational leadership on employees’ innovative work behavior in sustainable organizations: Test of mediation and moderation processes.
Sustainability (Switzerland), 11 (2019), pp. 1-21
[Li et al., 2018a]
J. Li, W. Wang, G. Sun, Z. Jiang, Z. Cheng.
Supervisor–subordinate Guanxi and job satisfaction among migrant workers in China.
Social Indicators Research, 139 (2018), pp. 293-307
[Li, Khan, Chughtai, & Le, 2022]
M. Li, H.S. Khan, M.S. Chughtai, T.T. Le.
Innovation onset: A moderated mediation model of high-involvement work practices and employees’ innovative work behavior.
Psychology Research and Behavior Management, (2022), pp. 471-490
[Li et al., 2018b]
Z. Li, P. Duverger, L. Yu.
Employee creativity trumps supervisor-subordinate Guanxi: Predicting prequitting behaviors in China's hotel industry.
Tourism Management, 69 (2018), pp. 23-37
[Liu et al., 2017]
C.E. Liu, Y. Chen, S. YU, S. Hu, J. Huang, C. Ding.
Supervisor incivility, psychology safety and employee turnover intention: Does supervisor-subordinate Guanxi matter?.
International Journal of Business and Social Science, 8 (2017), pp. 79-90
[Liu et al., 2019]
Y. Liu, W. Wang, D. Chen.
Linking ambidextrous organizational culture to innovative behavior: A moderated mediation model of psychological empowerment and transformational leadership.
Frontiers in Psychology, 10 (2019), pp. 1-12
[Lu et al., 2018]
X. Lu, B. Xie, Y. Guo.
The trickle-down of work engagement from leader to follower: The roles of optimism and self-efficacy.
Journal of Business Research, 84 (2018), pp. 186-195
[Mejia et al., 2018]
C. Mejia, Y. Wang, X. Zhao.
The impact of personal and professional Guanxi relationships on leader–member exchange in the Chinese hotel industry.
International Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Administration, 21 (2018), pp. 65-91
[Men et al., 2022]
L.R. Men, Y.S. Qin, J. Jin.
Fostering employee trust via effective supervisory communication during the COVID-19 pandemic: Through the lens of motivating language theory.
International Journal of Business Communication, 59 (2022), pp. 193-218
[Mergener and Trübner, 2022]
A. Mergener, M. Trübner.
Social relations and employees' rejection of working from home: A social exchange perspective.
New Technology, Work and Employment, 37 (2022), pp. 469-487
[Miao, Qian, Banks, & Seers, 2019]
C. Miao, S. Qian, G.C. Banks, A. Seers.
Supervisor-subordinate Guanxi: A meta-analytic review and future research agenda.
Human Resource Management Review, 30 (2019), pp. 1-17
[Nazir et al., 2018]
S. Nazir, W. Qun, L. Hui, A. Shafi.
Influence of social exchange relationships on affective commitment and innovative behavior: Role of perceived organizational support.
Sustainability, 10 (2018), pp. 1-20
[Özsungur, 2019]
F. Özsungur.
Ethical leadership, intrapreneurship, service innovation performance and work engagement in chambers of commerce and industry.
Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 29 (2019), pp. 1059-1081
[Permarupan et al., 2020]
P.Y. Permarupan, A. Al Mamun, N.K. Samy, R.A. Saufi, N. Hayat.
Predicting nurses burnout through quality of work life and psychological empowerment: A study towards sustainable healthcare services in Malaysia.
Sustainability, 12 (2020), pp. 1-18
[Podsakoff et al., 2003]
P.M. Podsakoff, S.B. MacKenzie, J.Y. Lee, N.P. Podsakoff.
Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (2003), pp. 879-903
[Podsakoff et al., 1990]
P.M. Podsakoff, S.B. MacKenzie, R.H. Moorman, R. Fetter.
Relationship among leadership, organizational commitment, and OCB in Uruguayan.
Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 1 (1990), pp. 107-142
[Preacher et al., 2007]
K.J. Preacher, D.D. Rucker, A.F. Hayes.
Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses : Theory, methods, and prescriptions.
Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42 (2007), pp. 185-227
[Ratasuk and Charoensukmongkol, 2020]
A. Ratasuk, P. Charoensukmongkol.
Does cultural intelligence promote cross-cultural teams’ knowledge sharing and innovation in the restaurant business?.
Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 12 (2020), pp. 183-203
[Schaufeli and Bakker, 2004]
W.B. Schaufeli, A.B. Bakker.
Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study.
Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 25 (2004), pp. 293-315
[Schaufeli et al., 2006]
W.B. Schaufeli, A.B. Bakker, M. Salanova.
The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study.
Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66 (2006), pp. 701-716
[Schaufeli et al., 2002]
W.B. Schaufeli, M. Salanova, V. González-Romá, A.B. Bakker.
The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach.
Journal of Happiness Studies, 3 (2002), pp. 71-92
[Scott and Bruce, 1994]
S.G. Scott, R.A. Bruce.
Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace.
Academy of Management Jo, 37 (1994), pp. 580-607
[Sobel, 1982]
M.E. Sobel.
Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models.
Sociological Methodology, 13 (1982), pp. 290-312
[Sokmen and Yasrebdoost, 2022]
A. Sokmen, H. Yasrebdoost.
Comparing the mediation role of organizational trust on the effect of workplace spirituality on organizational citizenship behavior.
[Sprietzer, 1995]
G.M. Sprietzer.
Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurements, and validation.
Academy of Management Journal, 38 (1995), pp. 1442-1465
[van Griethuijsen et al., 2014]
R.A.L.F. van Griethuijsen, M.W. van Eijck, H. Haste, P.J. den Brok, N.C. Skinner, N. Mansour, et al.
Global patterns in students’ views of science and interest in science.
Research in Science Education, 45 (2014), pp. 581-603
[Wang et al., 2016]
H. Wang, W. Wu, Y. Liu, S. Hao, S. Wu.
In what ways do Chinese employees speak up? An exchange approach to supervisor–subordinate Guanxi and voice behavior.
International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30 (2016), pp. 479-501
[Wong, 2017]
Y.T. Wong.
Trust, job security and subordinate–supervisor Guanxi: Chinese employees in joint ventures and state-owned enterprises.
Asia Pacific Business Review, 24 (2017), pp. 638-655
[Wong et al., 2003]
Y.T. Wong, H.Y. Ngo, C.S. Wong.
Antecedents and outcomes of employees’ trust in Chinese joint ventures.
Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 20 (2003), pp. 481-499
[Xian et al., 2017]
H. Xian, C. Atkinson, Y. Meng-Lewis.
Guanxi and high performance work systems in China: Evidence from a state-owned enterprise.
International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30 (2017), pp. 2685-2704
[Yan, 2018]
P. Yan.
Supervisor-subordinate Guanxi and employee voice behavior: Trust in supervisor as a mediator.
Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 46 (2018), pp. 1169-1178
[Yang, Huang, Tang, Yang, & Wu, 2019]
F. Yang, X. Huang, D. Tang, J. Yang, L. Wu.
How Guanxi HRM practice relates to emotional exhaustion and job performance: The moderating role of individual pay for performance.
The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32 (2019), pp. 2493-2518
[Zhang et al., 2017]
X. Zhang, J. Zhou, H.K. Kwan.
Configuring challenge and hindrance contexts for introversion and creativity: Joint effects of task complexity and Guanxi management.
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 143 (2017), pp. 54-68
[Zhou et al., 2020]
J. Zhou, C. Zhang, L. Shen, K.Z. Zhou.
Interpersonal guanxi and partner extra-role behavior: Mediating role of relational and transactional governance strategy.
Industrial Marketing Management, 91 (2020), pp. 551-562
Opciones de artículo