Información de la revista
Vol. 20. Núm. 2.
Páginas 61-63 (diciembre 2014)
Vol. 20. Núm. 2.
Páginas 61-63 (diciembre 2014)
Open Access
Bringing added value to educational assessment: A shift from an audit mode of assessment to an assistence mode
Cómo aportar valor añadido a la evaluación: de la auditoría a una función asistencial en la educación
Visitas
3998
María J. Navas
Autor para correspondencia
mjnavas@psi.uned.es
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Maria J. Navas. Departamento de Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento. Facultad de Psicología. Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia. Juan del Rosal, 10. 28040 Madrid (España).
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Maria J. Navas. Departamento de Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento. Facultad de Psicología. Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia. Juan del Rosal, 10. 28040 Madrid (España).
Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, Spain
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
References
[Anastasi, 1986]
A. Anastasi.
Evolving concepts of test validation.
Annual Review of Psychology, 37 (1986), pp. 1-15
[Bennett, 2010]
R.E. Bennett.
Cognitively based assessment of, for, and as learning: A. preliminary theory of action for summative and formative assessment.
Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 8 (2010), pp. 70-91
[Brennan, 2001]
R.L. Brennan.
Some problems, pitfalls, and paradoxes in educational measurement.
Educational Measurement: Issues & Practice, 20 (2001), pp. 6-17
[Deane and Song, 2014]
P. Deane, Y. Song.
A Case Study in Principled Assessment Design: Designing assessments to measure and support the development of argumentative reading and writing skills.
Psicología Educativa, 20 (2014), pp. 99-108
[de la Torre and Minchen, 2014]
J. de la Torre, N. Minchen.
Cognitively diagnostic assessments and the cognitive diagnosis model framework.
Psicología Educativa, 20 (2014), pp. 89-97
[Ebel, 1961]
R. Ebel.
Must all tests be valid?.
American Psychologist, 16 (1961), pp. 640-647
[Embretson and Gorin, 2001]
S. Embretson, J.S. Gorin.
Improving construct validity with cognitive psychology principles.
Journal of Educational Measurement, 38 (2001), pp. 343-368
[Kane, 2013]
M.T. Kane.
Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores.
Journal of Educational Measurement, 50 (2013), pp. 1-73
[Kane and Bejar, 2014]
M. Kane, I. Bejar.
Cognitive frameworks for assessment, teaching, and learning: A validity perspective.
Psicología Educativa, 20 (2014), pp. 117-122
[Kingston, 2007]
Kingston, N. (2007). Future challenges to psychometrics: Validity, validity, validity. In. C. R. Rao & S. Sinharay (Eds.), Psychometrics. Boston, MA: North Holland.
[Leighton, 2013]
Leighton, J. (2013). Large-scale assessment design and development for the measurement of student cognition. In M. Simon, K. Ercikan, & M. Rousseau (Eds.), Improving large-scale assessment in education: Theory, issues, and practice (pp. 13-26). New York: Routledge.
[Messick, 1994]
S. Messick.
The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments.
Educational Researcher, 23 (1994), pp. 13-23
[Mislevy, 2006]
Mislevy, R.J. (2006). Cognitive psychology and educational assessment. In R. Brennan (Ed.), Educational Measurement. Westport, CT: Praeger and American Council on Education.
[Mislevy et al., 2003]
R. Mislevy, L. Steinberg, R. Almond.
On the structure of educational assessments.
Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 1 (2003), pp. 3-62
[National Research and Council, 2011]
National Research Council. (2011). Incentives and Test-Based Accountability in Education. Committee on Incentives and Test Based Accountability in Public Education. M. Hout and S.W. Elliott, Editors. Board on Testing and Assessment, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
[Nichols, 1994]
P.D. Nichols.
A framework for developing cognitively diagnostic assessment.
Review of Educational Research, 64 (1994), pp. 575-603
[Pellegrino, 2014]
J. Pellegrino.
Assessment as a Positive Influence on 21st Century Teaching and Learning: A systems approach to progress.
Psicología Educativa, 20 (2014), pp. 65-77
[Pellegrino et al., 2001]
Pellegrino, J. W, Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
[Reeves, 2006]
Reeves, D.B. (2006). Foreword. In L. B. Ainsworth & D. J. Viegut, Common formative assessment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
[The Gorden, 2013]
The Gordon Commission on the Future of Assessment in Education (2013). Report: Future K–12 Education Assessments Must Help Improve Teaching and Learning, Inform Accountability. Press release, March, 11.
[Van Rijn et al., 2014]
P.W. Van Rijn, E.A. Graf, P. Deane.
Empirical recovery of argumentation learning progressions in scenario-based assessments of english language arts.
Psicología Educativa, 20 (2014), pp. 109-115
[Zieky, 2014]
M.J. Zieky.
An introduction to the use of evidence-centered design in test development.
Psicología Educativa, 20 (2014), pp. 79-87
Copyright © 2014. Colegio Oficial de Psicologos de Madrid