Información de la revista
Vol. 20. Núm. 2.
Páginas 117-123 (diciembre 2014)
Vol. 20. Núm. 2.
Páginas 117-123 (diciembre 2014)
Open Access
Cognitive frameworks for assessment, teaching, and learning: A validity perspective
Marcos cognitivos para la evaluación, la enseñanza y el aprendizaje: una perspectiva centrada en la validez
Visitas
4328
Educational Testing Service, Princeton, New Jersey, U.S.A
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
References
[Bejar et al., 2007]
Bejar, I.I., Braun, H., & Tannenbaum, R. (2007). A prospective, predictive and progressive approach to standard setting. In R. W. Lissitz (Ed.), Assessing and modeling cognitive development in school: Intellectual growth and standard setting (pp. 31-63). Maple Grove, MN: JAM Press.
[Bennett, 2010]
R.E. Bennett.
Cognitively Based Assessment of, for, and as Learning (CBAL): A preliminary theory of action for summative and formative assessment.
Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspective, 8 (2010), pp. 70-91
[Briggs and Alonzo, 2012]
Briggs, D.C., & Alonzo, A.C. (2012). The psychometric modeling of ordered multiple- choice item responses for diagnostic assessment with a learning progression. In A. C. Alonzo & A. Wenk Gotwals (Eds.), Learning progressions in science (pp. 293-316). Boston, MA: Sense Publishers.
[Cizek and Bunch, 2007]
G.J. Cizek, M.B. Bunch.
Standard setting: a guide to establishing and evaluating performance standards on tests.
Sage Publications, (2007),
[Deane and Song, 2014]
P. Deane, Y. Song.
A case study in principled assessment design: Designing assessments to measure and support the development of argumentative reading and writing skills.
Psicología Educativa, 20 (2014), pp. 99-108
[de la Torre and Minchen, 2014]
J. de la Torre, N. Minchen.
Cognitively diagnostic assessments and the cognitive diagnosis model framework.
Psicología Educativa, 20 (2014), pp. 89-97
[Ercikan, 2002]
K. Ercikan.
Disentangling sources of differential item functioning in multi- language assessments.
International Journal of Testing, 2 (2002), pp. 199-215
[Ferrara et al., 2007]
Ferrara, S., Phillips, G.W., Williams, P.L., Leinwand, S., Mahoney, S., & Ahadi, S. (2007). Vertically articulated performance standards: An exploratory of inferences about achievement and growth. In R. W. Lissitz (Ed.), Assessing and modeling cognitive development in school: Intellectual growth and standard setting. Maple Grove: MN: Jam Press.
[Hambleton and Pitoniak, 2006]
Hambleton, R.K., & Pitoniak, M. (2006). Setting performance standards. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational Measurement (4th ed., pp. 433-470). Westport, CT: Praeger.
[Hansen and Mislevy, 2008]
Hansen, E.G., & Mislevy, R.J. (2008). Design patterns for improving accessibility for test takers with disabilities (Research Report 08-49). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
[Heritage, 2008]
M. Heritage.
Learning progressions: supporting instruction and formative assessment.
National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student, (2008),
[Testing, 2014]
Testing (CRESST). Retrieved from. http://www.k12.wa.us/assessment/ClassroomAssessmentIntegration/pubdocs/ FASTLearningProgressions.pdf.
[Kane, 2013]
M.T. Kane.
Validation as a pragmatic, scientific activity.
Journal of Educational Measurement, 50 (2013), pp. 115-122
[Kannan, 2014]
Kannan, P. (in press). Content and performance standard articulation practices across the states: Report summarizing the results from a survey of the state departments of education (Research Report). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
[Lewis and Haug, 2005]
D.M. Lewis, C. Haug.
Aligning policy and methodology to achieve consistent across-grade performance standards.
Applied Measurement in Education, 8 (2005), pp. 11-34
[Lissitz and Wei, 2008]
R.W. Lissitz, H. Wei.
Consistency of standard setting in an augmented state testing system.
Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 27 (2008), pp. 46-55
[Mislevy et al., 2010]
Mislevy, R.J., Bejar, I.I., Bennett, R.E., Haertel, G.D., & Winters, F.I. (2010). Technology supports for assessment design. In G. McGaw, E. Baker & P. Peterson (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (3rd ed., vol. 8, pp. 56-65). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
[Mislevy and Haertel, 2006]
R.J. Mislevy, G.D. Haertel.
Implications of evidence-centered design for educational testing.
Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 25 (2006), pp. 6-20
[Mislevy et al., 2014]
Mislevy, R.J., Oranje, A., Bauer, M.I., von Davier, A., Hao, J., Corrigan, S., … John, M. (2014). Psychometrics considerations in game-based assessment. GlassLab Research, Institute of Play. Retrieved from http://www.instituteofplay.org/wp-content/ uploads/2014/02/GlassLab_GBA1_WhitePaperFull.pdf.
[Pellegrino, 2014]
J. Pellegrino.
Assessment as a positive influence on 21st century teaching and learning: A systems approach to progress.
Psicología Educativa, 20 (2014), pp. 65-77
[Riconscente et al., 2005]
Riconscente, M.M., Mislevy, R.J., & Hamel, L. (2005). An introduction to PADI task templates (Technical Report 3). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved from http://padi.sri.com/downloads/TR3_Templates.pdf.
[Schmeiser and Welch, 2006]
Schmeiser, C.B., & Welch, C.J. (2006). Test development. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.),. Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 307-353). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
[Sheehan and O’Reilly, 2012]
Sheehan, K.M., & O’Reilly, T. (2012). The case for scenario-based assessments of reading competency. In J. Sabatini, E. Albro & T. O’Reilly (Eds.), Reaching an understanding: Innovations in how we view reading assessment (pp. 19-33). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
[Van Rijn et al., 2014]
P. Van Rijn, E.A. Graf, P. Deane.
Empirical recovery of argumentation learning progressions in scenario-based assessments of english language arts.
Psicología Educativa, 20 (2014), pp. 109-115
[West et al., 2012]
West, P., Wise Rustein, D., Mislevy, R.J., Liu, J., Levy, R., Dicerbo, K., & Beherens, J.T. (2012). A Bayesian appraoch to modeling learning progessions. In A. C. Alonzo & A. Wenk Gotwals (Eds.), Learning progressions in science (pp. 257-292). Boston, MA: Sense Publishers.
[Williamson et al., 2006]
Williamson, D.M., Mislevy, R.J., & Bejar, I.I. (2006). Automated scoring of complex tasks in computer-based testing. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
[Wilson, 2012]
Wilson, M. (2012). Responding to the challenge that learning progressions pose to measurement practice: Hypothesised links between dimensions of the outcome progression. In A. C. Alonzo & A. Wenk Gotwals (Eds.), Learning progressions in science (pp. 317-344). Boston, MA: Sense Publishers.
[Zieky, 2014]
M.J. Zieky.
An introduction to the use of evidence-centered design in test development.
Psicología Educativa, 20 (2014), pp. 79-87
Copyright © 2014. Colegio Oficial de Psicologos de Madrid